Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Am J Hematol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 November 4.
Published in final edited form as:
Am J Hematol. 2010 February; 85(2): 10.1002/ajh.21585.
doi:  10.1002/ajh.21585
PMCID: PMC3816512

Heritability of Serum Iron Measures in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening (HEIRS) Family Study

Christine E. McLaren, Ph.D.,1 James C. Barton, M.D.,2 John H. Eckfeldt, M.D., Ph.D.,3 Gordon D. McLaren, M.D.,4 Ronald T. Acton, Ph.D.,5 Paul C. Adams, M.D.,6 Leora F. Henkin, M.S.,7 Victor R. Gordeuk, M.D.,8 Chris D. Vulpe, M.D., Ph.D.,9 Emily L. Harris, Ph.D.,10 Barbara W. Harrison, Ph.D.,11 Jacob A. Reiss, M.D.,12 and Beverly M. Snively, Ph.D.7


Heritability is the proportion of observed variation in a trait among individuals in a population that is attributable to hereditary factors. The HEIRS Family Study estimated heritability of serum iron measures. Probands were HFE C282Y homozygotes or non-C282Y homozygotes with elevated transferrin saturation (TS > 50%, men; TS > 45%, women) and serum ferritin concentration (SF > 300 μg/L, men; SF > 200 μg/L, women). Heritability (h2) was estimated by variance component analysis of TS, natural logarithm (ln) of SF, and unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC). Participants (N=942) were 77% Caucasians, 10% Asians, 8% Hispanics, and 5% other race/ethnicities. Average age (SD) was 49 (16) y; 57% were female. For HFE C282Y homozygote probands and their family members, excluding variation due to HFE C282Y and H63D genotype and measured demographic and environmental factors, the residual h2 (SE) was 0.21 (0.07) for TS, 0.37 (0.08) for ln SF, and 0.34 (0.08) for UIBC (all P < 0.0004 for comparisons with zero). For the non-C282Y homozygote proband group, residual h2 was significant with a value of 0.64 (0.26) for ln SF (p=0.0096). In conclusion, serum iron measures have significant heritability components, after excluding known genetic and non-genetic sources of variation.

Keywords: HFE, familial aggregation, transferrin saturation, serum ferritin concentration


Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) occurs in 0.2%–0.5% of US Caucasians [1,2]. Some persons with HH absorb excessive dietary iron and develop liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes mellitus, cardiomyopathy, and hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism [3]. Most persons with HH are homozygous for the C282Y mutation in the HFE gene on chromosome 6p21.3 [46]. H63D, another common HFE mutation, is infrequently associated with iron overload [79]. Other persons with hemochromatosis do not have either mutations C282Y or H63D [4]. Among HFE C282Y homozygotes, the spectrum of iron-related phenotypes is broad. Gender, age, diet, and blood loss account for some phenotypic variability [1012]. Mutations in known iron-related genes other than HFE explain phenotypic variability in a small proportion of cases [13]. Thus, much of the phenotypic variability among C282Y homozygotes is likely attributable to environmental or non-HFE heritable factors.

Heritability (h2) is defined as the proportion of total variance of a particular measurement in a population, taken at a particular time or age, that is attributable to variation in heritable factors [14]. Thus, heritability estimates are also affected by factors that may influence laboratory measurements used to assess iron phenotypes. Heritability analysis of a trait is performed using data from genetic relatives, incorporates data for an observed phenotype, and partitions observed variation into unobserved genetic and environmental factors [14]. Residual heritability is estimated after excluding variation in the trait due to measures included as covariates in the analysis.

The HEIRS Study is a multi-center, multi-ethnic study in which transferrin saturation (TS), serum ferrintin level (SF), unbound iron-binding capacity (UIBC), and HFE mutations were determined in 101,168 adults [15,16]. We hypothesized that genetic factors influence serum iron measures after excluding variation in these measures in HEIRS Study participants due to gender, age by gender interaction, C282Y and H63D genotype, and other clinical and demographic characteristics. Thus, we examined the heritability of serum iron phenotypes in participants in the HEIRS Family Study.


Study population

HEIRS Study participants ≥ 25 years old were recruited and screened as described in detail elsewhere cLaren, 2003 #195}. Participants with C282Y homozygosity or both TS and SF values above gender-specific thresholds (TS >50% and SF > 300 μg/L in men; TS > 45% and SF > 200 μg/L in women) participated in a clinical examination in which they completed personal and family medical history, and food frequency questionnaires. They received a brief physical examination, a blood draw, and appropriate genetic counseling. Based on results of the examination, a provisional diagnosis of iron overload was made (defined as confirmed elevations of both SF and TS with no evidence of inflammation, elevation of serum concentration of hepatic transaminases, or secondary iron overload defined as a lifetime history of anemia or more than 10 units of blood transfusion).

Participants categorized as having provisional iron overload, and all C282Y homozygotes, were defined as probands for the present study if a minimum number of first-degree relatives (biologic parents, full siblings, offspring) aged ≥ 19 years were also available for study. The HEIRS eligible family structures are described elsewhere; the minimum number of first-degree relative was two full siblings of the proband [17]. Family members and additional age-eligible first-degree relatives of eligible probands were invited for a similar clinical examination. Individual race/ethnicity was determined by self reports as described elsewhere [15]. Institutional review boards at each Study site reviewed and approved the Study.

Phenotypes and HFE genotypes

Serum iron concentration, TS, SF and UIBC were measured as previously reported [16]. SF values were transformed by natural logarithms for statistical analyses. C282Y and H63D genotypes were determined in probands and family members using a PCR-RFLP technique [4,18]. Lack of a detectable C282Y or H63D mutation is designated as HFE wild-type (wt/wt). Verification of reported familial relationships and integration of results from genome-wide linkage scan error checking were performed as described previously [17].

Statistical Analysis

Heritability analyses of TS, ln SF, and UIBC were performed using a variance component approach as implemented in Sequential Oligogenic Linkage Analysis Routines (SOLAR) software [19]. Stratified analyses were based on proband HFE genotype; families with a C282Y homozygote proband were analyzed separately from those with a non-C282Y homozygote proband. Models are described in the Supplementary Statistical Methods. Bivariate analyses were conducted to calculate estimates of genetic (rG) and environmental (rE) correlation between serum iron measures, after accounting for effects of HFE C282Y and H63D genotype and the additional covariates. For genetic correlations between serum iron measures, two-sided tests for the null hypothesis ρG = 0 versus the alternative hypothesis ρG ≠ 0 were conducted as well as tests for the null hypothesis ρG = 1 versus the alternative hypothesis ρG ≠ 1. To examine environmental correlations between serum iron measures, two-sided tests for the null hypothesis ρE = 0 were conducted.

Heritability (h2) and residual h2 were estimated using total additive genetic heritability under a polygenic model. Because non-C282Y homozygote proband families were ascertained through probands with elevated serum iron measures, all variance component analyses in the non-C282Y homozygote proband group included proband ascertainment correction as implemented in the SOLAR software [19]. P values ≤ 0.05 were defined to be statistically significant.


Characteristics of Study Subjects

The Study population included 174 families with a mean family size of 5.4 members per family for analysis. Characteristics of the 942 participants are displayed in Table 1. There were 77% whites, 10% Asians, 8% Hispanics, and 5% other race/ethnicities. Average age (SD) was 49 (16) y; 57% were female. The distribution of HFE genotypes was 22% C282Y/C282Y (31% in C282Y homozygote proband families), 7% (8%) C282Y/H63D, 2% (1%) H63D/H63D, 34% (43%) C282Y/wt, 8% (5%) H63D/wt, and 25% (12%) wt/wt.

Table 1
Characteristics of HEIRS Family Study participants*,

Phenotype analysis in HFE C282Y homozygote proband families

Mean (SD) TS and UIBC levels in these participants were 42.9% (22.4) and 172 μg/L (84), respectively (Table 1). The median and interquartile range for SF were 124.5 μg/L and 51.0–281.0 μg/L. Table 2 displays estimates of heritability (model A) and residual heritability (models B-D) for these measures. Heritability and residual heritability were significantly greater than zero (all P<1×10−3) for all of measures and h2 (SE) was 0.18 (0.07) for TS, 0.28 (0.07) for ln SF, and 0.34 (0.08) for UIBC. Residual heritability was similar using model B, consistent with the small proportion of variation due to these covariates (0.02 for TS, 0.18 for ln SF, and 0.02 for UIBC). In model C, residual heritability was greater for all measures than with model B: 0.28 (0.06) for TS, 0.34 (0.07) for ln SF, and 0.40 (0.07) for UIBC. As expected, C282Y (and H63D) genotype accounted for increased variability in serum iron measures. The proportion of variation due to age, gender, age by gender, and HFE genotype was 0.41 for TS, 0.36 for ln SF, and 0.45 for UIBC. Addition of interaction terms age × HFE genotype and gender × HFE genotype changed the model C results very slightly (data not shown). Under model D, after excluding variation in the iron measures due to many potential predictors, residual heritability was 0.21 (0.07) for TS, 0.37 (0.08) for ln SF, and 0.34 (0.08) for UIBC. Finally, the proportion of variation due to covariates consistently increased across models; the proportions under model D were 0.45 for TS, 0.41 for ln SF, and 0.50 for UIBC.

Table 2
Heritability analysis results for HFE C282Y homozygote proband families

Genetic and environmental correlations between iron measures under models C and D are presented in Table 3. As expected, all correlations were strongly negative between (inversely) related measures TS and UIBC. Furthermore, TS and ln SF had correlations >0, whereas, UIBC and ln SF had correlations <0. Genetic correlations with ln SF ranged from −0.61 to −0.54 for UIBC, and from 0.73 to 0.76 for TS. All genetic correlations were different from 0 and from 1 (P < 0.05).

Table 3
Genetic (rG), and environmental (rE) correlations between serum iron measures in families with HFE C282Y/C282Y probands

Phenotype analysis in HFE non-C282Y homozygote proband families

Mean (SD) TS and UIBC levels in participants were 44.5% (16.0) and 163 μg/L (63), respectively (Table 1). The median and interquartile range for SF were 208.5 μg/L and 83.0 – 370.5 μg/L, respectively, and h2 (SE), after correcting for proband ascertainment, was 0.10 (0.19) for TS, 0.41 (0.15) for ln SF, and 0.47 (0.19) for UIBC (Supplementary Table 4). Heritability for TS did not differ significantly from zero, and this finding persisted for residual heritability across models (all P ≥ 0.1 for TS, models A–D). Heritabilities and residual heritabilities for ln SF and UIBC were significantly different from zero (i.e., P ≤ 0.05) under all models except model D for UIBC. For ln SF and UIBC, residual heritability was similar to heritability, after accounting for variation due to age, gender, and age by gender (model B). After accounting for HFE C282Y and H63D genotype, residual heritability was consistently lower; residual heritability under model C was 0.04 (0.12) for TS, 0.42 (0.23) for ln SF, and 0.32 (0.19) for UIBC. This decrease in residual heritability was associated with greater proportions of variation due to covariates after inclusion of HFE genotype: 0.24 for TS, 0.40 for ln SF, and 0.24 for UIBC. Interaction terms, age × HFE genotype and gender × HFE genotype, altered the results from model C very slightly (data not shown). Under model D, after excluding variation in the iron measures due to many potential predictors, residual heritability was 0.01 (0.12) for TS, 0.64 (0.26) for ln SF, and 0.19 (0.18) for UIBC. The proportion of variation due to covariates consistently increased across models, with the proportion under model D equaling 0.32 for TS, 0.43 for ln SF, and 0.29 for UIBC. We did not report bivariate analyses for estimating genetic and environmental correlations between serum iron measures due to small sample limitations.


We modeled the total additive effects of heritable factors, i.e., the sum of average parental effects that yield mean values inherited in the offspring, in HFE C282Y and non-C282Y homozygote proband families. High heritability indicates that variation in an observed phenotype of the study population is caused by genotypic variation [14]. In the present study, we demonstrate that heritability estimates of TS, ln SF, and UIBC, were significantly greater than zero, after excluding variation in these phenotypes, due to gender, age, C282Y and H63D genotype, and other clinical and demographic characteristics. This implies that genetic variation plays a role in inter-individual differences in these measures. ln SF and UIBC had higher estimated heritability than TS. The genetic correlation between TS and UIBC was higher than that between either TS and ln SF or ln SF and UIBC. The latter results were expected because TS is calculated from the measured values of serum iron and UIBC. Results of this study complement those of the HEIRS Family Study genome-wide linkage scan in which evidence was reported for linkage of ln SF to chromosome 5q, of UIBC to chromosome 4p, and of TS, SF, and UIBC to the chromosome 6p region containing HFE. After adjustment for HFE genotype and other covariates, there was also evidence of linkage of SF to chromosome 16p and of UIBC to chromosomes 5q and 17q (P≤0.004 for all) [17]. In another HEIRS Study [20], denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) was used to detect mutations in 20 selected regions in six candidate genes known to influence iron metabolism in 789 participants. DHPLC analyses detected numerous mutations of HFE, SLC40A1, HAMP, HJV, TFR2, and FTL. Although the effect on iron metabolism of many of the missense mutations remains is unreported, their individual or cumulative allele frequencies do not account for most iron phenotype heterogeneity in HEIRS Study participant subgroups [20]. In the current study, probands without HFE C282Y homozygosity were ascertained because they had elevated values of SF and TS measured. Causes for these elevations may have been due to non-HFE iron overload or other reasons, but clinical assessment through liver biopsies or determination of phlebotomy-mobilizable iron was not available for all participants. The disparate results of analyses for the two family cohorts may reflect the fact that probands with C282Y homozygosity are genetically defined, whereas probands without C282Y homozygosity were defined using phenotype criteria. Thus, genetic differences may have contributed to the differences in heritability results for the two family cohorts. HFE hemochromatosis occurs predominantly in Caucasian populations [8,21,22]. In the present study, 96% of the participants in the families of probands with C282Y homozygosity reported Caucasian race/ethnicity. In families of probands without C282Y homozyogosity, only 29% reported Caucasian race/ethnicity.

There are extensive published data regarding strain-specific differences of iron phenotype in mice. For example, BMP6 has emerged as a key regulator of hepcidin expression through this pathway, and mice lacking BMP6 develop substantial iron loading [2325], as do Smad4-knockout mice [26]. In humans, multiple proteins are involved in iron metabolism and mutations in genes that encode transferrin receptor-2, hepcidin, hemojuvelin, and ferroportin cause different types of hemochromatosis [2729]. The high prevalence of elevated TS and SF values among Asians in the HEIRS Study led the investigators to hypothesize that this could be explained by HFE IVS5+1 G/A, splice site mutation previously reported in a Vietnamese man with iron overload [30,31]. A subsequent study indicated that this hypothesis was incorrect [31]. Asian patients from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Thailand with iron overload have been found to have mutations in HJV, HAMP, and SLC40A1; none had pathogenic HFE mutations. Nonetheless, it is likely that such cases are rare. Taken together, there observations suggest that presently unknown genes exert a significant influence on iron phenotypes [32].

The present results are consistent with other reports that indicate that iron phenotypes are associated with attributes other than HFE genotype. For example, a study of HFE C282Y homozygotes and their families detected a residual heritability for serum ferritin of 0.35 and concluded that male sex is the major factor associated with hyperferritinemia in hemochromatosis [33]. In a genetically isolated population in the southwest of the Netherlands, there was evidence of heritability of serum iron, TS and SF, after adjustment for age, sex, and C282Y and H63D genotypes [34]. In a candidate gene study of 592 unrelated C282Y homozygotes, there was a significant association of serum ferritin with the common single-nucleotide polymorphism rs235756 in the region of BMP2, a gene on chromosome 20p12 that encodes bone morphogenetic protein-2 [35]. The results of two genome-wide association studies performed on samples from Australians of European descent revealed that three variants (rs3811647, rs1799852, rs2280673) in the transferrin gene TF, plus the HFE C282Y mutation, explained approximately 40% of genetic variation in serum transferrin [36]. In a study regarding adult male and female twins recruited from the Australian Twin Registry (562 monozygotic and 571 dizygotic twin pairs), significant sources of variation in iron measures included age, sex, age-sex interaction, body mass index, and both of the common HFE alleles, C282Y and H63D [37]. After correction for age and body mass index, 23% and 31% of the variance in serum iron level, 66% and 49% of the variance in transferrin levels, 33% and 47% of the variance in TS, and 47% and 47% of the variance in SF could be explained by additive genetic factors, for men and women, respectively. C282Y and H63D variation accounted for less than 5% of the corrected phenotypic variance, except for TS (12% in women and 5% in men) [37]. Taken together, these results provide substantial although indirect evidence that as-yet-unidentified genes have influence on serum iron measures, in addition to confirming the effects of HFE genotype [17,37]. Concordance of iron measures between same-sex siblings with C282Y homozygosity also suggests that the variable phenotype in C282Y homozygotes may be caused by non-HFE genetic factors [38].

In the present study, 8.6% of participants in families of probands with C282Y homozygosity and 1.5% of participants in families of probands without C282Y homozygosity reported that they had been treated by quantitative phlebotomy (Table 1). Thus, a covariate was added to model D for both participant groups. Some general limitations to the method of analysis include the following: rigorous assumptions about the model may be untestable; accuracy of a heritability estimate is dependent upon the sampling error, a function of sample size and pedigree structure; and heritability of a trait depends on the population. Nevertheless, the heritability parameter can be used successfully to compare traits within and across populations [14]. Because proband ascertainment differed across families, separate analyses were conducted in families with an HFE C282Y homozygote proband and in those with a non-C282Y homozygote proband. The pattern of heritability across different models was more consistent for C282Y homozygote proband families than for non-C282Y homozygote proband families, and may reflect the influence of ascertainment criteria. Although ascertainment corrections were implemented in families ascertained through probands with elevated TS and SF levels, selection of families in this manner may affect the external generalizability of heritability estimates. It is possible that genes that modulate iron accumulation in hemochromatosis patients may differ from those that control serum iron measures in the healthy population. Thus, it would be interesting to estimate heritability of serum iron values in a cohort of C282Y homozygotes. This issue was not explored because of the lack of families with C282Y alleles segregating at the HFE locus. In contrast, our approach to estimating heritability relied on the occurrence of multiple phenotypes within families. Regardless, the estimated heritability of TS, SF, and UIBC that we observed in the present study confirms and extends the results of studies of other diverse populations [3338].

We conclude that TS, SF, and UIBC phenotypes in HEIRS Family Study participants have significant heritability, even after excluding effects of C282Y and H63D genotypes and other known factors that influence these measures. This suggests that other genetic variants contribute to iron phenotype variability. Gene discovery studies could identify other genes or alleles that affect phenotype variations of iron absorption and metabolism.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table 1 (Statistical methods)

Supplementary Table 4. Heritability analysis results for HFE non-C282Y homozygote proband families


The HEIRS Study was initiated and funded by NHLBI, in conjunction with NHGRI. The study is supported by contracts N01-HC-05185 (University of Minnesota), N01-HC-05186 (Howard University), N01-HC-05188 (University of Alabama at Birmingham), N01-HC-05189 (Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research), N01-HC-05190 (University of California, Irvine), N01-HC-05191 (London Health Sciences Centre), and N01-HC-05192 (Wake Forest University). Additional support was provided grant R01 HL083328-01A1 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (C.E.M.), the University of Alabama at Birmingham General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) grant M01-RR00032, Southern Iron Disorders Center (J.C.B.), Howard University GCRC grant M01-RR10284, Howard University Research Scientist Award UH1-HL03679-05 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Office of Research on Minority Health (V.R.G.); and grant UC Irvine M01RR 00827-29 from the General Clinical Research Centers Program of the National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health. C.E.M, J.C.B, J.H.E, G.D.M, R.TA, P.C.A, V.R.G, E.L.H, B.M.S., and J.A.R, assisted with study design, data collection, and manuscript preparation. B.M.S. and L.F.H provided data base design and data analysis. C.D.V. contributed to manuscript preparation.

Participating Institutions and Principal Staff


Birmingham, AL--University of Alabama at Birmingham:

Dr. Ronald T. Acton (Principal Investigator), Dr. James C. Barton (Co-Principal Investigator), Ms. Deborah Dixon, Dr. Susan Ferguson, Dr. Richard Jones, Dr. Jerry McKnight, Dr. Charles A. Rivers, Dr. Diane Tucker and Ms. Janice C. Ware.

Irvine, CA--University of California, Irvine:

Dr. Christine E. McLaren (Principal Investigator), Dr. Gordon D. McLaren (Co-Principal Investigator), Dr. Hoda Anton-Culver, Ms. Jo Ann A. Baca, Dr. Thomas C. Bent, Dr. Lance C. Brunner, Dr. Michael M. Dao, Dr. Korey S. Jorgensen, Dr. Julie Kuniyoshi, Dr. Huan D. Le, Dr. Miles K. Masatsugu, Dr. Frank L. Meyskens, Dr. David Morohashi, Dr. Huan P. Nguyen, Dr. Sophocles N. Panagon, Dr. Chi Phung, Dr. Virgil Raymundo, Dr. Thomas Ton, Professor Ann P. Walker, Dr. Lari B. Wenzel and Dr. Argyrios Ziogas.

London, Ontario, Canada--London Health Sciences Center:

Dr. Paul C. Adams (Principal Investigator), Ms. Erin Bloch, Dr. Subrata Chakrabarti, Ms. Arlene Fleischhauer, Ms. Helen Harrison, Ms. Kelly Jia, Ms. Sheila Larson, Dr. Edward Lin, Ms. Melissa Lopez, Ms. Lien Nguyen, Ms. Corry Pepper, Dr. Tara Power, Dr. Mark Speechley, Dr. Donald Sun and Ms. Diane Woelfle.

Portland, OR and Honolulu, HI--Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Northwest and Hawaii, and Oregon Health and Science University:

Dr. Emily L. Harris (Principal Investigator), Dr. Mikel Aickin, Dr. Elaine Baker, Ms. Marjorie Erwin, Ms. Joan Holup, Ms. Carol Lloyd, Dr. Nancy Press, Dr. Richard D. Press, Dr. Jacob Reiss, Dr. Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Ms. Aileen Uchida, Dr. Thomas Vogt and Dr. Dwight Yim.

Washington, D.C.--Howard University:

Dr. Victor R. Gordeuk (Principal Investigator), Dr. Fitzroy W. Dawkins (Co-Principal Investigator), Ms. Margaret Fadojutimi-Akinsiku, Dr. Oswaldo Castro, Dr. Debra White-Coleman, Dr. Melvin Gerald, Ms. Barbara W. Harrison, Dr. Ometha Lewis-Jack, Dr. Robert F. Murray, Dr. Shelley McDonald-Pinkett, Ms. Angela Rock, Dr. Juan Romagoza and Dr. Robert Williams.


Minneapolis, MN --University of Minnesota and University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview:

Dr. John H. Eckfeldt (Principal Investigator and Steering Committee Chair), Ms. Susie DelRio-LaFreniere, Ms. Catherine Leiendecker-Foster, Dr. Ronald C. McGlennen, Mr. Greg Rynders, Dr. Michael Y. Tsai and Dr. Xinjing Wang.


Winston-Salem, NC--Wake Forest University:

Dr. David M. Reboussin (Principal Investigator), Dr. Beverly M. Snively (Co-Principal Investigator), Dr. Roger Anderson, Ms. Aarthi Balasubramanyam, Ms. Elease Bostic, Ms. Brenda L. Craven, Ms. Shellie Ellis, Dr. Curt Furberg, Mr. Jason Griffin, Dr. Mark Hall, Mr. Darrin Harris, Ms. Leora Henkin, Dr. Sharon Jackson, Dr. Tamison Jewett, Mr. Mark D. King, Mr. Kurt Lohman, Ms. Laura Lovato, Dr. Joe Michaleckyj, Ms. Shana Palla, Ms. Tina Parks, Ms. Leah Passmore, Dr. Pradyumna D. Phatak, Dr. Stephen Rich, Ms. Andrea Ruggiero, Dr. Mara Vitolins, Mr. Gary Wolgast and Mr. Daniel Zaccaro.


Bethesda, MD--Ms. Phyliss Sholinsky (Project Officer), Dr. Ebony Bookman, Dr. Henry Chang, Ms. Kristianne Cooper, Dr. Richard Fabsitz, Dr. Cashell Jaquish, Dr. Teri Manolio and Ms. Lisa O’Neill.


Bethesda, MD—Dr. Elizabeth Thomson.

Dr. Jean MacCluer, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, also contributed to the design of this study.


1. Edwards CQ, Griffen LM, Goldgar D, et al. Prevalence of hemochromatosis among 11,065 presumably healthy blood donors. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:1355–62. [PubMed]
2. Motulsky AG, Beutler E. Population screening in hereditary hemochromatosis. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:65–79. [PubMed]
3. Barton JC, McDonnell SM, Adams PC, et al. Management of hemochromatosis. Hemochromatosis Management Working Group. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:932–9. [PubMed]
4. Feder JN, Gnirke A, Thomas W, et al. A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nat Genet. 1996;13:399–408. [PubMed]
5. Feder JN, Penny DM, Irrinki A, et al. The hemochromatosis gene product complexes with the transferrin receptor and lowers its affinity for ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1472–7. [PubMed]
6. Beutler E. The significance of the 187G (H63D) mutation in hemochromatosis. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:762–4. [PubMed]
7. Adams P, Brissot P, Powell LW. EASL International Consensus Conference on Haemochromatosis. J Hepatol. 2000;33:485–504. [PubMed]
8. Merryweather-Clarke AT, Pointon JJ, Jouanolle AM, et al. Geography of HFE C282Y and H63D mutations. Genet Test. 2000;4:183–98. [PubMed]
9. Pietrangelo A. Hereditary hemochromatosis--a new look at an old disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2383–97. [PubMed]
10. Bothwell T, Charlton R, Cook J, et al. Iron Metabolism in Man. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1979.
11. Whitfield JB, Treloar S, Zhu G, et al. Relative importance of female-specific and non-female-specific effects on variation in iron stores between women. Br J Haematol. 2003;120:860–6. [PubMed]
12. Zacharski LR, Ornstein DL, Woloshin S, et al. Association of age, sex, and race with body iron stores in adults: analysis of NHANES III data. Am Heart J. 2000;140:98–104. [PubMed]
13. Beutler E. Penetrance of haemochromatosis. Gut. 2003;52:610–1. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Visscher PM, Hill WG, Wray NR. Heritability in the genomics era--concepts and misconceptions. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:255–66. [PubMed]
15. McLaren CE, Barton JC, Adams PC, et al. Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening (HEIRS) study design for an evaluation of 100,000 primary care-based adults. Am J Med Sci. 2003;325:53–62. [PubMed]
16. Adams PC, Reboussin DM, Barton JC, et al. Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1769–78. [PubMed]
17. Acton RT, Snively BM, Barton JC, et al. A genome-wide linkage scan for iron phenotype quantitative trait loci: the HEIRS Family Study. Clin Genet. 2007;71:518–29. [PubMed]
18. Jouanolle AM, Gandon G, Jezequel P, et al. Haemochromatosis and HLA-H. Nat Genet. 1996;14:251–2. [PubMed]
19. Almasy L, Blangero J. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:1198–211. [PubMed]
20. Barton JC, Lafreniere SA, Leiendecker-Foster C, et al. HFE, SLC40A1, HAMP, HJV, TFR2, and FTL mutations detected by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography after iron phenotyping and HFE C282Y and H63D genotyping in 785 HEIRS Study participants. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:710–4. [PubMed]
21. Rochette J, Pointon JJ, Fisher CA, et al. Multicentric origin of hemochromatosis gene (HFE) mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1056–62. Erratum, Am J Hum Genet 999;64:491. [PubMed]
22. Acton RT, Barton JC, Snively BM, et al. Geographic and racial/ethnic differences in HFE mutation frequencies in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening (HEIRS) Study. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:815–21. [PubMed]
23. Andriopoulos B, Jr, Corradini E, Xia Y, et al. BMP6 is a key endogenous regulator of hepcidin expression and iron metabolism. Nat Genet. 2009;41:482–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Camaschella C. BMP6 orchestrates iron metabolism. Nat Genet. 2009;41:386–8. [PubMed]
25. Meynard D, Kautz L, Darnaud V, et al. Lack of the bone morphogenetic protein BMP6 induces massive iron overload. Nat Genet. 2009;41:478–81. [PubMed]
26. Wang RH, Li C, Xu X, et al. A role of SMAD4 in iron metabolism through the positive regulation of hepcidin expression. Cell Metab. 2005;2:399–409. [PubMed]
27. Camaschella C, Roetto A, Cali A, et al. The gene TFR2 is mutated in a new type of haemochromatosis mapping to 7q22. Nat Genet. 2000;25:14–5. [PubMed]
28. Fernandes A, Preza GC, Phung Y, et al. The molecular basis of hepcidin-resistant hereditary hemochromatosis. Blood. 2009;114:437–43. [PubMed]
29. Goswami T, Andrews NC. Hereditary hemochromatosis protein, HFE, interaction with transferrin receptor 2 suggests a molecular mechanism for mammalian iron sensing. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28494–8. [PubMed]
30. Steiner M, Ocran K, Genschel J, et al. A homozygous HFE gene splice site mutation (IVS5+1 G/A) in a hereditary hemochromatosis patient of Vietnamese origin. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:789–95. [PubMed]
31. Steiner M, Leiendecker-Foster C, McLaren GD, et al. Hemochromatosis (HFE) gene splice site mutation IVS5+1 G/A in North American Vietnamese with and without phenotypic evidence of iron overload. Transl Res. 2007;149:92–5. [PubMed]
32. Lok CY, Merryweather-Clarke AT, Viprakasit V, et al. Iron overload in the Asian community. Blood. 2009;114:20–5. [PubMed]
33. Lazarescu A, Snively BM, Adams PC. Phenotype variation in C282Y homozygotes for the hemochromatosis gene. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:1043–6. [PubMed]
34. Njajou OT, Alizadeh BZ, Aulchenko Y, et al. Heritability of serum iron, ferritin and transferrin saturation in a genetically isolated population, the Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) Study. Hum Hered. 2006;61:222–8. [PubMed]
35. Milet J, Dehais V, Bourgain C, et al. Common variants in the BMP2, BMP4, and HJV genes of the hepcidin regulation pathway modulate HFE hemochromatosis penetrance. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:799–807. [PubMed]
36. Benyamin B, McRae AF, Zhu G, et al. Variants in TF and HFE explain approximately 40% of genetic variation in serum-transferrin levels. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:60–5. [PubMed]
37. Whitfield JB, Cullen LM, Jazwinska EC, et al. Effects of HFE C282Y and H63D polymorphisms and polygenic background on iron stores in a large community sample of twins. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1246–58. [PubMed]
38. Whiting PW, Fletcher LM, Dixon JK, et al. Concordance of iron indices in homozygote and heterozygote sibling pairs in hemochromatosis families: implications for family screening. J Hepatol. 2002;37:309–14. [PubMed]