PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2013 November 1; 288(44): 31477–31487.
Published online 2013 September 17. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M113.514984
PMCID: PMC3814744

Dhrs3 Protein Attenuates Retinoic Acid Signaling and Is Required for Early Embryonic Patterning* An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

All-trans-retinoic acid (atRA) is an important morphogen involved in many developmental processes, including neural differentiation, body axis formation, and organogenesis. During early embryonic development, atRA is synthesized from all-trans-retinal (atRAL) in an irreversible reaction mainly catalyzed by retinal dehydrogenase 2 (aldh1a2), whereas atRAL is converted from all-trans-retinol via reversible oxidation by retinol dehydrogenases, members of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. atRA is degraded by cytochrome P450, family 26 (cyp26). We have previously identified a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 3 (dhrs3), which showed differential expression patterns in Xenopus embryos. We show here that the expression of dhrs3 was induced by atRA treatment and overexpression of Xenopus nodal related 1 (xnr1) in animal cap assay. Overexpression of dhrs3 enhanced the phenotype of excessive cyp26a1. In embryos overexpressing aldh1a2 or retinol dehydrogenase 10 (rdh10) in the presence of their respective substrates, Dhrs3 counteracted the action of Aldh1a2 or Rdh10, indicating that retinoic acid signaling is attenuated. Knockdown of Dhrs3 by antisense morpholino oligonucleotides resulted in a phenotype of shortened anteroposterior axis, reduced head structure, and perturbed somitogenesis, which were also found in embryos treated with an excess of atRA. Examination of the expression of brachyury, not, goosecoid, and papc indicated that convergent extension movement was defective in Dhrs3 morphants. Taken together, these studies suggest that dhrs3 participates in atRA metabolism by reducing atRAL levels and is required for proper anteroposterior axis formation, neuroectoderm patterning, and somitogenesis.

Keywords: Development, Embryo, Gene Regulation, Retinal Metabolism, Retinoid, dhrs3, Retinoic Acid, Embryonic Patterning, Xenopus

Introduction

All-trans-retinoic acid (atRA)5 is a morphogen playing essential roles in various early developmental events, including neural differentiation, mesoderm and endoderm formation, anteroposterior (AP) patterning, and left-right asymmetry of axis formation. It has been implicated that RA signaling is also involved in later organogenesis of the heart (13), lung (4, 5), kidney (6, 7), and pancreas (8). Deficiency or an excess of atRA induces developmental defects in the limb, branchial arches, central nervous system, and internal organs, indicating that a balanced RA concentration is essential for normal embryonic development (9, 10).

atRA is synthesized by two groups of dehydrogenases mainly through two enzymatic steps. All-trans-retinol (atROL) is first reversibly oxidized into all-trans-retinal (atRAL) by retinol dehydrogenases, members of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. The reaction is followed by irreversible oxidation of atRAL to atRA, mediated by aldehyde dehydrogenases. At least three retinoic acid-related aldehyde dehydrogenases have been identified in the human, mouse, zebrafish, and Xenopus with different physiological functions (11). atRA directly regulates transcription of target genes via interaction with the heterodimer of retinoic acid receptor and retinoid X receptor (12). The degradation of atRA is mainly carried out by cytochrome P450, family 26 (cyp26) (9). All these atRA metabolic enzymes coordinate with each other in developing embryos to maintain a proper gradient of atRA along the axes (13). Mis-regulation of these atRA metabolic enzymes, and thus atRA, results in severe defects of vertebrate embryonic development (1416). For example, knockdown of rdh10 in Xenopus embryos down-regulated organizer gene expression and caused a ventralized phenotype and anteriorization of the brain. Overexpression of aldh1a2 inhibited the formation of the anterior axis, a phenotype that was also found in atRA-treated embryos. Mice lacking all three CYP26 genes showed duplication of the body axis because of the expansion of the Nodal expression domain (17).

We have previously identified a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 3 (dhrs3) through a gene profiling assay on different regions of early Xenopus gastrula, and we found that dhrs3 displayed differential expression in developing embryos (18). It was reported that human DHRS3 (previously also called retSDR1) is inducible by atRA and also acts as a retinal reductase that increased concentrations of retinyl ester by converting retinal to retinol in a neuroblastoma cell line (19). Zebrafish dhrs3 was also found to be essential for neural ectoderm patterning in zebrafish embryos (20).

In this study, we addressed the question of how Dhrs3 acted in atRA metabolism during embryonic development, and how Dhrs3 regulated embryonic patterning. We found that the expression of dhrs3 was induced by atRA treatment and overexpression of Xenopus nodal related 1 (xnr1). Its spatial expression showed a complementary pattern to aldh1a2 at the neurula stage. In embryos overexpressing aldh1a2 or rdh10 in the presence of their respective substrates, Dhrs3 counteracted the action of Aldh1a2 or Rdh10, suggesting that RA signaling was attenuated. Knockdown of Dhrs3 by antisense morpholino oligonucleotides indicated that Dhrs3 was required for proper anteroposterior axis formation, neuroectoderm patterning, and somitogenesis and that Dhrs3 played an important role in convergent extension movement.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Maintenance of Frogs, Embryo Collection, and Fixation

Adult frogs (Xenopus laevis) were purchased from NASCO. Embryos were staged according to Nieuwkoop and Faber (21), and fixed in 1× HEMFA (0.1 m HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mm EGTA, 1 mm MgSO4, 3.7% formaldehyde) for whole mount in situ hybridization.

Whole Mount in Situ Hybridization

The procedure was performed as described by Harland (22). Antisense RNA probes were synthesized by using DIG RNA labeling mix (Roche Applied Science) with T7, T3, or SP6 RNA polymerase (Promega). Lineage tracing was performed by lacZ staining as described previously (23).

RT-PCR

Total RNA from sample (5 whole embryos or 20 animal caps) was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse-transcribed by Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) following the manufacturers' protocol. PCR was performed by using GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega). The sequence of primers used for RT-PCR is listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Primer sequences used for RT-PCR in this study

Animal Cap Assay

Animal caps were excised from the animal pole of embryos at stage 8.5, followed by culturing in animal cap culture solution (67% L-15 medium, 7.5 mm Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mg/ml BSA). For retinoid treatments, culture solution was supplemented with retinoid dissolved in DMSO.

Morpholino and mRNA Injection

A translation-blocking morpholino targeting Dhrs3 was used to knock down Dhrs3 (Dhrs3 MO-GCGTTCTGTCAGCCCTGTCACTCAT). Antisense morpholino was purchased from Gene Tools, LLC (Philomath, OR). Capped mRNA was synthesized from linearized plasmids by using mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 kit (Ambion).

In Vitro Translation of Protein, SDS-PAGE, and Western Blot Analysis

TnT® SP6-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (L4600, Promega) was used to translate dhrs3 in vitro. FLAG-tagged full-length dhrs3 construct was translated in vitro with Dhrs3 morpholino according to the manufacturer's instruction. The reaction product was separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blot using anti-FLAG M2 antibody (F1804, Sigma). The signals were detected and analyzed by using LI-COR® Odyssey® infrared imaging system (LI-COR® Biosciences).

Quantitative PCR

Gene expression level of en2, krox20, hoxb3, myoD, fgf8, and pax3 was assessed using quantitative PCR. Briefly, total RNA from embryos was extracted and reverse-transcribed to synthesize cDNA. PCRs were performed by using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Takara) and specific primers with ABI 7900HT fast real time PCR system (Applied Biosystem). Expression level of odc was used for normalization. All quantitative PCRs were performed in triplicate.

Comparative Measurement of Endogenous atRA Using Cell-based Luciferase Assay

The atRA concentration in Xenopus embryos was measured using the method described elsewhere (24). Briefly, the endogenous atRA was extracted by first homogenizing embryos in distilled water, followed by liquid-liquid extraction using a mixture of hexane and isopropyl alcohol (65:15 v/v). The organic phase was collected, vacuum-dried, and resuspended in DMSO. The embryo extracts containing endogenous atRA were diluted 500-fold in DMEM before applying to HEK293T cells transiently transfected with pRL-Renilla reporter plasmid and retinoic acid-responsive element-driven luciferase reporter plasmid by Lipofectamine (Invitrogen). After 48 h of atRA treatment, the transfected cells were subjected to Dual-Luciferase® reporter assay system according to the manufacturer's protocol (Promega). Serial dilutions of atRA were used to generate standard curve of log-log plot showing the relationship between the atRA standard and the corresponding luciferase activity. atRA concentration in Xenopus embryos was determined by using this standard curve. The atRA concentration of the injected embryos was normalized to that of control embryos to generate relative atRA concentration. All assays were performed in triplicate.

Measurement of Endogenous atRA with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)

Fifty stage 10 Xenopus laevis embryos were homogenized in 100 μl of 0.9% w/v sodium chloride solution, followed by liquid/liquid extraction using a mixture of hexane and isopropyl alcohol (65:15 v/v). The mixture was vortexed for 1 min, followed by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 1 min. The supernatant containing atRA was recovered, dried in vacuo, and resuspended in 25 μl of methanol containing 5 mm ammonium formate and 0.1% acetic acid.

For the LC-MS analysis, 2 μl of atRA sample was separated on a C18 column (Agilent Zorbax, 2.1 × 150 mm, 1.8 μm) using ultra-HPLC system (Agilent 1290) with a flow rate of 0.35 ml/min, in a linear gradient of 10% buffer A (0.1% acetic acid) to 95% buffer B (100% ACN containing 0.1% acetic acid). The eluate was sprayed using Agilent Dual Jet Stream source into a Q-TOF type mass spectrometer, operating at negative mode (Agilent 6550 Q-TOF MS). The relative amount of atRA was estimated from the peak area of m/z 299.2016 in the ion chromatogram.

RESULTS

dhrs3 Expression Was Up-regulated by All-trans-retinoic Acid

Previously, we have reported that dhrs3 was expressed in the neural plate and pronephros during early embryonic development (18), which prompted us to use the animal cap assay to examine the expression of dhrs3 after atRA treatments and overexpression of chordin. Both atRA and chordin are morphogens involved in the neuroectoderm patterning in Xenopus (10, 25). atRA is also an essential factor for pronephros development (7). We found that animal caps exposed to exogenous atRA showed an elevated dhrs3 expression, indicating that dhrs3 was atRA-responsive (Fig. 1A, lane 3). This observation is in line with previous research findings in retSDR1, the human homolog of DHRS3 (19). Moreover, the dhrs3 expression domain in neurulae was also intensified and expanded, covering almost the entire neural plate after the atRA treatment. Similarly, expanded expression domains of cyp26a1 were also observed after atRA treatment (Fig. 1B). By contrast, the expression of dhrs3 was not induced by injection of chordin mRNA in animal cap cells (Fig. 1A, lane 4).

FIGURE 1.
dhrs3 expression is induced by atRA. A, expression of dhrs3 in whole embryos and animal caps was induced in response to a 4-h treatment of 1 μm atRA or xnr1 overexpression. WE, whole embryos; AC, animal cap. B, expression patterns of dhrs3 and ...

We also found that during gastrulation dhrs3 expression was enriched in the dorsal blastopore lip, and its expression was localized in the involuting mesoderm during gastrulation (18). Various signaling pathways have been found to be involved in mesoderm formation during gastrulation, including Nodal, FGF, and Wnt signaling pathways (2629). We therefore activated these mesoderm-related signaling pathways in animal caps and investigated their effects on dhrs3 expression. We found that overexpression of xnr1, a ligand of nodal signaling pathway, induced dhrs3 expression (Fig. 1A, lane 6). The induction of dhrs3 by xnr1 was not due to the mesoderm induction as dhrs3 expression was not elicited by embryonic fibroblast growth factor (efgf) (Fig. 1A, lanes 6 and 7). Both xnr1 and efgf can induce the pan-mesoderm marker brachyury in animal cap assay (28, 30, 31). Ectopic wnt3a, however, had little effect on dhrs3 expression (Fig. 1A, lane 5). To demonstrate that these signaling pathways were indeed activated, we examined an array of markers, including hoxd1, for atRA and Wnt signaling (Fig. 1A, lanes 3 and 5) (32, 33), sox2 for chordin and FGF signaling (Fig. 1A, lanes 4 and 7) (34, 35), siamois for Wnt signaling (Fig. 1A, lane 5) (36), and brachyury for FGF and Nodal signaling (Fig. 1A, lanes 6 and 7) (28). As expected, all of these marker genes were up-regulated accordingly.

Because we observed that dhrs3 was up-regulated by atRA in animal cap assay, we next compared the expression pattern of dhrs3 with those of aldh1a2 and cyp26a1, respectively. At stage 13, dhrs3 was localized in the dorsal midline, which corresponds to the notochord region, and two bilateral patches in the neural plate (18). cyp26a1 encoding an enzyme for atRA degradation was localized in the anterior-most region and the region surrounding the posterior blastopore. aldh1a2 encoding a major enzyme for atRA synthesis was expressed in presumptive presomitic and lateral plate mesoderm. At the tadpole stage (stage 35), dhrs3 expression pattern was mainly localized in the pronephros and central nervous system, whereas cyp26a1 was expressed in the branchial arches and the tail region, and aldh1a2 expression was mainly found in the pronephros region, a region where dhrs3 was also expressed (Fig. 1C). Considering the facts that 1) atRA is an important signaling molecule during neural tube patterning and pronephros formation, 2) two important atRA metabolizing enzymes, cyp26a1 and aldh1a2, were localized to these regions, and 3) human homolog of DHRS3 exerts functions in atRA metabolism, we therefore suggested that dhrs3 also played a role in atRA metabolism during embryonic development.

Dhrs3 Attenuated RA Signaling by Counteracting the Action of Aldh1a2 and Rdh10

We further questioned how dhrs3 regulated RA signaling. Because human DHRS3 acts as a retinal reductase that increases concentrations of retinyl ester by converting retinal to retinol in a neuroblastoma cell line (19), we then studied the effects of dhrs3 on the embryos overexpressing aldh1a2. As a major atRA-producing enzyme in embryos, Aldh1a2 can oxidize atRAL to atRA (37). It has been shown that overexpression of aldh1a2 together with an exogenous supply of atRAL can elevate atRA levels, resulting in phenotypes of repression of head and anterior axis similar to those induced directly by atRA treatment (38). Here, two-cell stage embryos were injected with aldh1a2 mRNA alone or in combination with dhrs3 mRNA, which was followed by the treatment with either atRAL or DMSO during gastrulation stages. Without atRAL, overexpression with 2 ng of aldh1a2 alone or in combination with dhrs3 did not induce obvious morphological effects on the embryos (Fig. 2A). With the presence of 0.5 μm atRAL, there were no visible abnormalities in the uninjected embryos (Fig. 2A, left panel). However, embryos overexpressing aldh1a2 exhibited a shortened body axis and a smaller head structure (Fig. 2A, middle panel), which are typical phenotypes induced by atRA treatment (Fig. 5D). This result suggested that atRAL was oxidized by aldh1a2 into atRA. Interestingly, these phenotypes were partially rescued by co-overexpression with dhrs3 (Fig. 2A, right panel). To assess the severity of the observed phenotypes, we quantified the relative head diameter of the embryos by measuring the distance between the cement gland and the anterior-most somite as the head diameter. As shown in Fig. 2B, in the presence of atRAL, overexpression of aldh1a2 alone induced about 20% reduction in the relative head diameter, which was significantly rescued by co-overexpression with dhrs3. This result suggested that Dhrs3 counteracted the action of aldh1a2 possibly through reducing atRA levels.

FIGURE 2.
Overexpression of dhrs3 counteracts the action of Aldh1a2. A, morphology of stage 35 embryos injected with 2 ng of aldh1a2 alone or in combination with 2 ng of dhrs3 at the two-cell stage, followed by treatment with either DMSO or 0.5 μm atRAL ...
FIGURE 5.
dhrs3 morphants exhibit shortened axis and reduced head structure. A, 25-base-long morpholino was designed to target the 5′-UTR region of dhrs3. The start codon ATG is underlined. B, Western blot shows that Dhrs3 MO inhibited in vitro translation ...

To verify our observation, we used the animal cap assay with a similar experimental design to examine the expression level of four atRA-responsive genes, including hoxd1, gbx2, cdx4, and lhx1 (39). The animal caps overexpressing aldh1a2 alone or in combination with dhrs3 were cultured in 0.25 μm atRAL or DMSO and were subsequently collected for RT-PCR analysis. In the absence of exogenous atRAL, we found that ectopic aldh1a2 alone only slightly induced the expression of the atRA-responsive genes (Fig. 2C, lane 4), possibly by oxidizing endogenous atRAL into atRA, although co-overexpression with dhrs3 suppressed such induction (Fig. 2C, lane 5). In the presence of atRAL, all atRA-responsive genes examined were slightly induced (Fig. 2C, lanes 2 and 6), possibly due to oxidation by endogenous enzymes. Overexpression of aldh1a2 further induced the expression of atRA-responsive genes (Fig. 2C, lane 7), implicating increased production of atRA by aldh1a2, although co-overexpression with dhrs3 attenuated this induction (Fig. 2C, lane 8, compare with lane 7). These results demonstrated that dhrs3 suppressed the expression of atRA-responsive genes induced by the combined effects of aldh1a2 and atRAL. This also suggested that Dhrs3 was involved in the reduction of atRA levels, possibly by competing with Aldh1a2 for the same substrate, atRAL (Fig. 2D).

To further test our hypothesis that Dhrs3 reduces the level of atRA oxidized from atRAL, we studied the effect of Dhrs3 on the embryos overexpressing rdh10, which catalyzes the oxidation of atROL to atRAL, thereby promoting the synthesis of atRA in the embryos (39). Animal cap assay indicated that in the presence of atROL, ectopic rdh10 strongly induced the expression of atRA-responsive genes, including hoxd1, gbx2, and cdx4 (Fig. 3A, lane 5), whereas co-overexpression with dhrs3 reduced the expression of these four genes (Fig. 3A, lane 6). These data suggested that Dhrs3 antagonized the action of Rdh10, resulting in a lower level of atRAL and thus atRA. This was further supported by a rescue experiment, in which the phenotypes induced by dhrs3 overexpression were reversed by the treatment with a sub-teratogenic dose of atRAL. Injection of dhrs3 mRNA resulted in a posterior axis truncation at stage 35, which was alleviated by a supplement of 0.5 μm of atRAL during gastrulation (Fig. 3, B and C). Thus, unlike Cyp26a1, which attenuates RA signaling through degrading atRA in embryos, Dhrs3 appeared to remove atRAL and thus reduced atRA production. We therefore proposed that Dhrs3 exerted its function in embryonic development through antagonizing Aldh1a2 (Fig. 2) and Rdh10 (Fig. 3, A and B).

FIGURE 3.
Overexpression of dhrs3 attenuates RA signaling. A, overexpression of dhrs3 counteracts the action of rdh10. Expression of atRA-responsive genes hoxd1, gbx2, and cdx4 in animal caps overexpressing rdh10 alone or in combination with dhrs3 in the presence ...

We also found that overexpression of dhrs3 resulted in a dose-dependent posterior truncation, which was similar to that induced by cyp26a1 overexpression (Fig. 3, D and E). Moreover, overexpression of dhrs3 enhanced the phenotype of excessive cyp26a1 (Fig. 3, D and E). We next examined the expression of en2, krox20, and hoxb3, which are midbrain and hindbrain markers of neuroectoderm patterning and are regulated by RA signaling (9). We found that overexpression of dhrs3 caused a posterior shift of the expression domain of these genes on the injection side of embryos (Fig. 3F), which was also similar to the effects exerted by the ectopic cyp26a1 (supplemental Fig. 1). Taken together, these data suggested that Dhrs3 negatively regulates RA signaling.

Overexpression of dhrs3 Reduced Concentration of atRA in Embryos

To assess the direct effect of dhrs3 on atRA metabolism, embryonic atRA was quantitated by using HEK293T cells transfected with the retinoic acid-responsive element-driven luciferase vector (24). In this measurement method, the elevation of the luciferase activity is directly correlated with the increase of atRA but not retinol (data not shown) (24). We were able to measure the changes within the range from 10−7 to 10−11 m of atRA (Fig. 4A). The atRA concentration in embryos overexpressing atRA-degrading enzyme cyp26a1 was lower compared with control (Fig. 4B), as we expected. Similarly, overexpression of dhrs3 also reduced the level of endogenous atRA (Fig. 4B). In contrast, overexpression of aldh1a or rdh10, both of which can enhance atRA synthesis, caused a significant increase of the atRA concentration in embryos compared with that in control embryos. We have observed a similar trend when we analyzed the content of endogenous atRA in embryos using the LC-MS method (Fig. 4C and supplemental Fig. 3), albeit less profound. Embryos overexpressing aldh1a2, or injected with Dhrs3 MO, showed a 2.02- or 4.01-fold increase of atRA compared with the control, respectively. This demonstrated that dhrs3 negatively regulates RA signaling by suppressing atRA synthesis.

FIGURE 4.
dhrs3 negatively regulates the synthesis of endogenous atRA. A, log-log plot showing the relationship between different concentrations of atRA standard applied to HEK293T cells and the respective luciferase activity. B, relative concentration of embryonic ...

dhrs3 Was Required for AP Axis Formation and Neuroectoderm Patterning

RA signaling pathway has been implicated in various developmental processes, including axis formation and neuroectoderm patterning (37, 40). Using an antisense MO targeting dhrs3 5′-UTR region, we carried out a loss-of-function study to further investigate the roles of dhrs3 during early embryonic development (Fig. 5A). The specificity of the Dhrs3 MO was confirmed by the inhibition of in vitro translation (Fig. 5B) of the full-length dhrs3-FLAG construct. In addition, when Dhrs3 MO and dhrs3-FLAG mRNA were co-injected into the Xenopus embryos at the two-cell stage, the Dhrs3 MO strongly suppressed the translation of Dhrs3-FLAG in vivo, further supporting the specificity of Dhrs3 MO (Fig. 5C). Embryos injected with Dhrs3 MO at the two-cell stage showed a severely shortened anteroposterior (AP) axis and reduced head structure when compared with the uninjected control embryos at stage 35 (Fig. 5D). This abnormal morphology resembled the phenotype of embryos exposed to 1 μm atRA at gastrulation stage, which also displayed a shortened AP axis and reduced head structure (Fig. 5D). Increasing injection doses of Dhrs3 MO at the two-cell stage induced more severe reduction of the head structure as revealed by the reduction of the relative head diameter (Fig. 5E), whereas co-injection with dhrs3 mRNA rescued the phenotype with the head diameter statistically larger than that of Dhrs3 MO alone (Fig. 5, D and E). We also tested the effect of Dhrs3 MO on atRA synthesis using cell-based luciferase assay. Knockdown of Dhrs3 increased the concentration of atRA in embryos, similar to the effects of overexpression of aldh1a2 and rdh10, but in a less significant manner (Fig. 4B). Together, these results confirmed the specificity of Dhrs3 MO and indicated that dhrs3 was required for the formation of the AP axis and head structure.

Because overexpression of Dhrs3 caused posterior shift of hindbrain markers, next we used whole mount in situ hybridization to examine the expression of midbrain and hindbrain markers in Dhrs3 morphants. Consistent with the significant reduction of the head diameter (Fig. 5D), the expression of neuroectoderm marker genes en2, krox2, and hoxb3 in Dhrs3 morphants was abolished or suppressed on the injected side (Fig. 5, F and G), implicating that neuroectoderm patterning was defective. Because we were not able to observe reversed phenotypes of the hindbrain in Dhrs3 morphants compared with Dhrs3 overexpressed embryos, we reasoned that the inhibition of hindbrain markers might be due to defective mesoderm movements underneath the neural ectoderm. We then examined the mesoderm marker brachyury and the organizer markers lhx1 and goosecoid during gastrulation (Fig. 6). Compared with the control embryos, all Dhrs3 morphants showed a disruption of the brachyury expression ring at the dorsal blastopore lip (Fig. 6A2, arrow) and a reduction in the migration distance of goosecoid (Fig. 6, compare C2 with C1), suggesting that mesoderm formation and involution were defective at the stage examined. The expression of the atRA responsive gene, lhx1, however, was intensified and expanded in the dorsal blastopore lip to a moderate extent by Dhrs3 MO (Fig. 6, compare B2 with B1), suggesting an elevated atRA level. Notably, the brachyury and lhx1 phenotypes were similar to that induced by atRA treatment (Fig. 6, A4, arrow, and B4). It is also worth noting that the brachyury expression domain in the early neurulation stage was partially recovered (Fig. 7E), although the shape of expression domain was not normal. Co-injection of dhrs3 mRNA with Dhrs3 MO resumed the normal expression of brachyury, lhx1, and goosecoid (Fig. 6, A3, B3, and C3), which again indicated that the effect of Dhrs3 MO was specific. Collectively, these data indicated that dhrs3 was required for the normal formation of the AP axis at least in part by regulating the involution of the mesoderm during gastrulation.

FIGURE 6.
Expression patterns of mesoderm and organizer marker genes in Dhrs3 morphants and embryos treated with 1 μm atRA during gastrulation. Embryos were injected at the two-cell stage with either 30 ng of Dhrs3 MO or 30 ng of Dhrs3 MO plus 1 ng of ...
FIGURE 7.
Defective convergent extension movement induced by knockdown of Dhrs3. Expression of mesoderm and notochord marker genes brachyury (bra), not, and goosecoid (gsc), and CE marker gene papc in control embryos (A–D), in response to dhrs3 knockdown ...

Because the AP axis of developing embryos undergoes dramatic extension during gastrula and neurula stages, which is driven at least in part through cell movements called convergent extension (CE) (41), we also examined the expression patterns of the mesoderm markers brachyury, notochord homeobox (not), and goosecoid, which are expressed during the normal CE movements at the neurula stages (27). Compared with the corresponding control embryos (Fig. 7, A–C), the expression domains of brachyury and not in Dhrs3 morphants were clearly shortened along the dorsal midline (Fig. 7, E and F), indicating a defect of the CE movement at the neurula stages, and simultaneously the expression of goosecoid was reduced (Fig. 7G). The observed alterations of not and goosecoid expression in Dhrs3 morphants were consistent with those induced by atRA (Fig. 7, N and O), which also showed a reduction of brachyury expression (Fig. 7M). However, overexpression of dhrs3 had little effect on the expression of these three marker genes (Fig. 7, I–K). These data suggested that dhrs3 regulated the AP axis development through modulating the CE movement.

This notion was further supported by examining the expression of paraxial protocadherin (papc) in Dhrs3 morphants. papc is known to regulate the CE movement and axis formation (42, 43). Compared with the control (Fig. 7D), although dhrs3 overexpression had little effect on papc expression (Fig. 7L), depletion of Dhrs3 resulted in more diffuse papc signals in the dorsal midline region (Fig. 7H). These diffuse signals were not observed in control embryos (Fig. 7D). Similarly, atRA treatment also led to diffused and even more suppressed papc expression (Fig. 7P).

Because the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway has been implicated in the regulation of the CE movement, we also examined the expression of molecules involved in Wnt/PCP signaling, including wnt5a, wnt11, dishevelled, and frizzled7. However, we did not find obvious changes at the mRNA level of these genes in Dhrs3 morphants (data not shown). Taken together, these data indicated that Dhrs3 was required for neuroectoderm patterning, normal formation of AP axis during gastrulation, as well as AP axis extension during the CE movement.

dhrs3 Was Required for Somitogenesis

Apart from the CE movement, somitogenesis is another mechanism that extends the AP axis by forming sequential somite blocks along the AP direction. Therefore, we examined whether dhrs3 was necessary for somitogenesis. Immunohistochemical staining of the somites at stage 28 with antibody 12/101 showed that the formation of somite was disrupted in Dhrs3 morphants (Fig. 8B). The 12/101 signals in Dhrs3 morphants lacked the segmentation pattern compared with the control (Fig. 8, compare B with A). In addition, the staining of the somites was reduced (Fig. 8B′). Next, we examined expression of genes involved in the somite formation, including myoD, pax3, and fgf8 in Dhrs3 morphants (4446). In the control embryos (Fig. 8, C–E), the segmentation of somites was clearly shown by expression of myoD, pax3, and fgf8 (Fig. 8, C′–E′, arrow); however, in Dhrs3 morphants, this characteristic segmentation pattern was lost, and expressions of myoD, pax3 and fgf8 became diffuse (Fig. 8, F–H and F′–H′). Real time PCR indicated their expression levels were also suppressed compared with those of the control (Fig. 8I). These data indicated that Dhrs3 was required for normal somitogenesis.

FIGURE 8.
Knockdown of Dhrs3 interferes with somitogenesis. Dhrs3 MO (30 ng) was injected at the two-cell stage, and the morphants were collected at stage 28 for immunostaining and whole mount in situ hybridization analysis. A–B′, immunostaining ...

DISCUSSION

Retinoic acid is produced from retinol by two successive enzymatic reactions catalyzed by different sets of dehydrogenases (37, 40). The importance of the upstream metabolic pathway, including the redox reaction between atROL and atRAL, however, is less understood during the early embryonic development. Here, we have shown that Dhrs3 is inducible by atRA and plays an important role in attenuating RA synthesis and signaling. We also suggested that Dhrs3 regulated embryonic development by decreasing the atRAL supply and in turn reducing the atRA level. This suggestion is supported by the following observations. First, overexpression of dhrs3 induced similar phenotypes as did overexpression of cyp26a1, and the phenotypes induced by excessive cyp26a1 were further enhanced by dhrs3 overexpression (Fig. 3). Given that cyp26a1 negatively regulates RA signaling by degrading atRA, it is therefore very likely that dhrs3 also plays a negative role in the regulation of RA signaling. Second, in the cell-based luciferase assay, the endogenous atRA level in embryos was strongly reduced by dhrs3 overexpression, although the atRA level was elevated by Dhrs3 knockdown, as shown by LC-MS analysis (Fig. 4). Third, ectopic dhrs3 reduced the phenotypes of aldh1a2 overexpression in the presence of atRAL as well as rdh10 overexpression in the presence of atROL (Figs. 2 and and3).3). Although aldh1a2 and rdh10 catalyze different enzymatic reactions in the RA metabolism, both promote the synthesis of atRA (39). The reduction of aldh1a2- or rdh10-induced phenotype by dhrs3 suggested that dhrs3 functions by either removing atRAL or directly inhibiting aldh1a2 and/or rdh10. Considering that human DHRS3 has already been shown to act as a retinal reductase, which increases concentrations of retinyl ester by converting retinal to retinol in a neuroblastoma cell line (19), our own observations strongly suggest that Dhrs3 suppresses the effects of ectopic Aldh1a2 by competing with Aldh1a2 for the same substrate atRAL, the precursor of atRA, and that it reverses the effects of ectopic rdh10 by simply consuming the reaction product of rdh10, which is also atRAL. This is further supported by the finding that the effects of overexpression of dhrs3 were rescued by a sub-teratogenic dose of atRAL (Fig. 3). Fourth, knockdown of Dhrs3 by antisense morpholino oligonucleotides caused an increase of the atRA concentration in Dhrs3 morphants (Fig. 4). In line with this, knockdown of Dhrs3 induced an expansion of lhx1 in pronephros, whereas overexpression of dhrs3 inhibited the expression of lhx1 in the same region (supplemental Fig. 2). It has been known that the pronephros development is regulated by RA signaling (37, 47), and many genes related to the pronephros development are also induced by RA signaling, including lhx1, wt-1, and pteg (7, 4850). It has also been reported that an increase of RA signaling results in an expansion of the pronephric domain, and inhibition of RA signaling suppresses the formation of the pronephros (7). These data provided strong evidence that dhrs3 negatively regulated RA signaling by modulating RA metabolism. Further biochemical characterization of Dhrs3 on retinoid metabolism is required to determine the enzymatic specificity during embryonic development. It is also interesting to identify the protein that presents the substrate to Dhrs3, which also determines the substrate specificity of Dhrs3.

The loss-of-function assay indicated that dhrs3 was required for the AP axis formation. During gastrulation, the high expression of brachyury in the mesoderm was temporarily disrupted by dhrs3 knockdown, suggesting a regulatory role of Dhrs3 in the mesoderm formation that would subsequently affect the AP axis formation. However, at the neurula stages, the disrupted brachyury expression was partially recovered (Fig. 7), although the AP axis formation did not seem to catch up. These observations implicated that at this stage Dhrs3 may modulate the AP axis formation through interaction with other tissues. Indeed, at the early neurulation, we found that the notochord did not extend to its full length in Dhrs3 morphants, as shown by brachyury and not expression (Fig. 7). This phenotype was also observed in embryos with CE movement defects (27). Furthermore, Dhrs3 morphants also displayed changes in the expression domain and intensity of lhx1 and papc, both of which have been shown to participate in the regulation of the CE movement (51). These findings further supported that the shortened body axis was induced at least in part by the shortening of the notochord, which possibly resulted from the defects in the CE movement. Detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the defective CE movement when Dhrs3 is knocked down await further investigations. Thus far, information on how the CE movement is regulated in X. laevis is not yet completed. It has been reported that atRA can induce the expression of retinoic acid inducible genes, which then activate Rho small GTPase through binding to frizzled7 (52). Both Rho small GTPase and frizzled7 are required in the regulation of the CE movement (53). It is of special interest to determine how dhrs3 acts to regulate lhx1, papc, and the activity of CE effectors, namely Rho small GTPases.

RA signaling is also essential for somitogenesis. Studies have already shown that embryos with disrupted somitogenesis also display a shortened AP axis (54). In this study, abnormal somite formation was also observed after knockdown of dhrs3, suggesting that defective somitogenesis under the influence of altered RA signaling may also be attributed to the formation of the shortened body axis.

In summary, we have investigated the role of dhrs3 in RA signaling as well as in early embryonic development. We showed that dhrs3 attenuated RA signaling and that it was required for the normal anteroposterior axis formation through mediating mesoderm formation, convergent extension movement, and somitogenesis.

Acknowledgments

We thank the colleagues in our laboratories for helpful discussions on this project.

*This work was supported in part by Grants CUHK480709 and N_CUHK413/12 from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (to H. Z.), in part by Key Project of Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant KSCX2-YW-R-083 (to Y. L. C.), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 81270438 (to G. X.).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S3.

5The abbreviations used are:

atRA
all-trans-retinoic acid
atRAL
all-trans-retinal
aldh1a2
retinal dehydrogenase 2
atROL
all-trans-retinol
cyp26
cytochrome P450, family 26
RA
retinoic acid
AP
anteroposterior
MO
morpholino oligonucleotide
CE
convergent extension
AP
anteroposterior.

REFERENCES

1. Mic F. A., Haselbeck R. J., Cuenca A. E., Duester G. (2002) Novel retinoic acid generating activities in the neural tube and heart identified by conditional rescue of Raldh2 null mutant mice. Development 129, 2271–2282 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Niederreither K., Vermot J., Messaddeq N., Schuhbaur B., Chambon P., Dollé P. (2001) Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for heart morphogenesis in the mouse. Development 128, 1019–1031 [PubMed]
3. Ryckebusch L., Wang Z., Bertrand N., Lin S. C., Chi X., Schwartz R., Zaffran S., Niederreither K. (2008) Retinoic acid deficiency alters second heart field formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2913–2918 [PubMed]
4. Chen F., Desai T. J., Qian J., Niederreither K., Lü J., Cardoso W. V. (2007) Inhibition of Tgfβ signaling by endogenous retinoic acid is essential for primary lung bud induction. Development 134, 2969–2979 [PubMed]
5. Esteban-Pretel G., Marín M. P., Renau-Piqueras J., Barber T., Timoneda J. (2010) Vitamin A deficiency alters rat lung alveolar basement membrane: reversibility by retinoic acid. J. Nutr. Biochem. 21, 227–236 [PubMed]
6. Wingert R. A., Selleck R., Yu J., Song H. D., Chen Z., Song A., Zhou Y., Thisse B., Thisse C., McMahon A. P., Davidson A. J. (2007) The cdx genes and retinoic acid control the positioning and segmentation of the zebrafish pronephros. PLoS Genet. 3, 1922–1938 [PubMed]
7. Cartry J., Nichane M., Ribes V., Colas A., Riou J. F., Pieler T., Dollé P., Bellefroid E. J., Umbhauer M. (2006) Retinoic acid signalling is required for specification of pronephric cell fate. Dev. Biol. 299, 35–51 [PubMed]
8. Chen Y., Pan F. C., Brandes N., Afelik S., Sölter M., Pieler T. (2004) Retinoic acid signaling is essential for pancreas development and promotes endocrine at the expense of exocrine cell differentiation in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 271, 144–160 [PubMed]
9. Hollemann T., Chen Y., Grunz H., Pieler T. (1998) Regionalized metabolic activity establishes boundaries of retinoic acid signalling. EMBO J. 17, 7361–7372 [PubMed]
10. Tanibe M., Michiue T., Yukita A., Danno H., Ikuzawa M., Ishiura S., Asashima M. (2008) Retinoic acid metabolizing factor xCyp26c is specifically expressed in neuroectoderm and regulates anterior neural patterning in Xenopus laevis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 893–901 [PubMed]
11. Duester G., Mic F. A., Molotkov A. (2003) Cytosolic retinoid dehydrogenases govern ubiquitous metabolism of retinol to retinaldehyde followed by tissue-specific metabolism to retinoic acid. Chem. Biol. Interact. 143, 201–210 [PubMed]
12. Gronemeyer H., Gustafsson J. A., Laudet V. (2004) Principles for modulation of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 950–964 [PubMed]
13. White R. J., Schilling T. F. (2008) How degrading: Cyp26s in hindbrain development. Dev. Dyn. 237, 2775–2790 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Sandell L. L., Sanderson B. W., Moiseyev G., Johnson T., Mushegian A., Young K., Rey J. P., Ma J. X., Staehling-Hampton K., Trainor P. A. (2007) RDH10 is essential for synthesis of embryonic retinoic acid and is required for limb, craniofacial, and organ development. Genes Dev. 21, 1113–1124 [PubMed]
15. Mendelsohn C., Lohnes D., Décimo D., Lufkin T., LeMeur M., Chambon P., Mark M. (1994) Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (II). Multiple abnormalities at various stages of organogenesis in RAR double mutants. Development 120, 2749–2771 [PubMed]
16. Abu-Abed S., Dollé P., Metzger D., Beckett B., Chambon P., Petkovich M. (2001) The retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme, CYP26A1, is essential for normal hindbrain patterning, vertebral identity, and development of posterior structures. Genes Dev. 15, 226–240 [PubMed]
17. Uehara M., Yashiro K., Takaoka K., Yamamoto M., Hamada H. (2009) Removal of maternal retinoic acid by embryonic CYP26 is required for correct Nodal expression during early embryonic patterning. Genes Dev. 23, 1689–1698 [PubMed]
18. Kam R. K., Chen Y., Chan S. O., Chan W. Y., Dawid I. B., Zhao H. (2010) Developmental expression of Xenopus short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase 3. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 54, 1355–1360 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Cerignoli F., Guo X., Cardinali B., Rinaldi C., Casaletto J., Frati L., Screpanti I., Gudas L. J., Gulino A., Thiele C. J., Giannini G. (2002) retSDR1, a short-chain retinol dehydrogenase/reductase, is retinoic acid-inducible and frequently deleted in human neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 62, 1196–1204 [PubMed]
20. Feng L., Hernandez R. E., Waxman J. S., Yelon D., Moens C. B. (2010) Dhrs3a regulates retinoic acid biosynthesis through a feedback inhibition mechanism. Dev. Biol. 338, 1–14 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Nieuwkoop P. D., Faber J. (1967) Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin), Garland Publishing Inc., New York
22. Harland R. M. (1991) In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 36, 685–695 [PubMed]
23. Zhao H., Cao Y., Grunz H. (2001) Isolation and characterization of a Xenopus gene (XMLP) encoding a MARCKS-like protein. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 45, 817–826 [PubMed]
24. Chen Y., Huang L., Solursh M. (1994) A concentration gradient of retinoids in the early Xenopus laevis embryo. Dev. Biol. 161, 70–76 [PubMed]
25. Wessely O., De Robertis E. M. (2002) Neural plate patterning by secreted signals. Neuron 33, 489–491 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Shen M. M. (2007) Nodal signaling: developmental roles and regulation. Development 134, 1023–1034 [PubMed]
27. Luxardi G., Marchal L., Thomé V., Kodjabachian L. (2010) Distinct Xenopus Nodal ligands sequentially induce mesendoderm and control gastrulation movements in parallel to the Wnt/PCP pathway. Development 137, 417–426 [PubMed]
28. Latinkić B. V., Umbhauer M., Neal K. A., Lerchner W., Smith J. C., Cunliffe V. (1997) The Xenopus Brachyury promoter is activated by FGF and low concentrations of activin and suppressed by high concentrations of activin and by paired-type homeodomain proteins. Genes Dev. 11, 3265–3276 [PubMed]
29. Caneparo L., Huang Y. L., Staudt N., Tada M., Ahrendt R., Kazanskaya O., Niehrs C., Houart C. (2007) Dickkopf-1 regulates gastrulation movements by coordinated modulation of Wnt/β catenin and Wnt/PCP activities, through interaction with the Dally-like homolog Knypek. Genes Dev. 21, 465–480 [PubMed]
30. Isaacs H. V., Pownall M. E., Slack J. M. (1994) eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation. EMBO J. 13, 4469–4481 [PubMed]
31. Jones C. M., Kuehn M. R., Hogan B. L., Smith J. C., Wright C. V. (1995) Nodal-related signals induce axial mesoderm and dorsalize mesoderm during gastrulation. Development 121, 3651–3662 [PubMed]
32. Kolm P. J., Sive H. L. (1995) Regulation of the Xenopus labial homeodomain genes, HoxA1 and HoxD1: activation by retinoids and peptide growth factors. Dev. Biol. 167, 34–49 [PubMed]
33. Janssens S., Denayer T., Deroo T., Van Roy F., Vleminckx K. (2010) Direct control of Hoxd1 and Irx3 expression by Wnt/β-catenin signaling during anteroposterior patterning of the neural axis in Xenopus. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 54, 1435–1442 [PubMed]
34. Mizuseki K., Kishi M., Matsui M., Nakanishi S., Sasai Y. (1998) Xenopus Zic-related-1 and Sox-2, two factors induced by chordin, have distinct activities in the initiation of neural induction. Development 125, 579–587 [PubMed]
35. Mansukhani A., Ambrosetti D., Holmes G., Cornivelli L., Basilico C. (2005) Sox2 induction by FGF and FGFR2 activating mutations inhibits Wnt signaling and osteoblast differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 168, 1065–1076 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Ishibashi H., Matsumura N., Hanafusa H., Matsumoto K., De Robertis E. M., Kuroda H. (2008) Expression of Siamois and Twin in the blastula Chordin/Noggin signaling center is required for brain formation in Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech. Dev. 125, 58–66 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Kam R. K., Deng Y., Chen Y., Zhao H. (2012) Retinoic acid synthesis and functions in early embryonic development. Cell Biosci. 2, 11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Chen Y., Jürgens K., Hollemann T., Claussen M., Ramadori G., Pieler T. (2003) Cell-autonomous and signal-dependent expression of liver and intestine marker genes in pluripotent precursor cells from Xenopus embryos. Mech. Dev. 120, 277–288 [PubMed]
39. Strate I., Min T. H., Iliev D., Pera E. M. (2009) Retinol dehydrogenase 10 is a feedback regulator of retinoic acid signalling during axis formation and patterning of the central nervous system. Development 136, 461–472 [PubMed]
40. Duester G. (2007) Retinoic acid regulation of the somitogenesis clock. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 81, 84–92 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Tada M., Heisenberg C. P. (2012) Convergent extension: using collective cell migration and cell intercalation to shape embryos. Development 139, 3897–3904 [PubMed]
42. Kim S. H., Yamamoto A., Bouwmeester T., Agius E., Robertis E. M. (1998) The role of paraxial protocadherin in selective adhesion and cell movements of the mesoderm during Xenopus gastrulation. Development 125, 4681–4690 [PubMed]
43. Kuroda H., Inui M., Sugimoto K., Hayata T., Asashima M. (2002) Axial protocadherin is a mediator of prenotochord cell sorting in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 244, 267–277 [PubMed]
44. Harvey R. P. (1992) MyoD protein expression in Xenopus embryos closely follows a mesoderm induction-dependent amplification of MyoD transcription and is synchronous across the future somite axis. Mech. Dev. 37, 141–149 [PubMed]
45. Williams B. A., Ordahl C. P. (1994) Pax-3 expression in segmental mesoderm marks early stages in myogenic cell specification. Development 120, 785–796 [PubMed]
46. Brent A. E., Tabin C. J. (2004) FGF acts directly on the somitic tendon progenitors through the Ets transcription factors Pea3 and Erm to regulate scleraxis expression. Development 131, 3885–3896 [PubMed]
47. Dequéant M. L., Pourquié O. (2008) Segmental patterning of the vertebrate embryonic axis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 370–382 [PubMed]
48. Lee S. J., Kim S., Choi S. C., Han J. K. (2010) XPteg (Xenopus proximal tubules-expressed gene) is essential for pronephric mesoderm specification and tubulogenesis. Mech. Dev. 127, 49–61 [PubMed]
49. Taira M., Otani H., Jamrich M., Dawid I. B. (1994) Expression of the LIM class homeobox gene Xlim-1 in pronephros and CNS cell lineages of Xenopus embryos is affected by retinoic acid and exogastrulation. Development 120, 1525–1536 [PubMed]
50. Bollig F., Perner B., Besenbeck B., Köthe S., Ebert C., Taudien S., Englert C. (2009) A highly conserved retinoic acid responsive element controls wt1a expression in the zebrafish pronephros. Development 136, 2883–2892 [PubMed]
51. Hukriede N. A., Tsang T. E., Habas R., Khoo P. L., Steiner K., Weeks D. L., Tam P. P., Dawid I. B. (2003) Conserved requirement of Lim1 function for cell movements during gastrulation. Dev. Cell 4, 83–94 [PubMed]
52. Harada Y., Yokota C., Habas R., Slusarski D. C., He X. (2007) Retinoic acid-inducible G protein-coupled receptors bind to frizzled receptors and may activate non-canonical Wnt signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 358, 968–975 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Lee Y. M., Lee J. O., Jung J. H., Kim J. H., Park S. H., Park J. M., Kim E. K., Suh P. G., Kim H. S. (2008) Retinoic acid leads to cytoskeletal rearrangement through AMPK-Rac1 and stimulates glucose uptake through AMPK-p38 MAPK in skeletal muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 33969–33974 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Aulehla A., Pourquié O. (2010) Signaling gradients during paraxial mesoderm development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000869. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Kolm P. J., Apekin V., Sive H. (1997) Xenopus hindbrain patterning requires retinoid signaling. Dev. Biol. 192, 1–16 [PubMed]
56. Taira M., Jamrich M., Good P. J., Dawid I. B. (1992) The LIM domain-containing homeo box gene Xlim-1 is expressed specifically in the organizer region of Xenopus gastrula embryos. Genes Dev. 6, 356–366 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology