Myeloid dendritic cells induce Th2 responses to inhaled antigen, leading to eosinophilic airway inflammation

doi:10.1172/JCI8107

J Clin Invest. 2000 August 15; 106(4): 551–559.

PMCID: PMC380243

Myeloid dendritic cells induce Th2 responses to inhaled antigen, leading to eosinophilic airway inflammation

Bart N. Lambrecht,^1,² Marijke De Veerman,³ Anthony J. Coyle,⁴ Jose-Carlos Gutierrez-Ramos,⁴ Kris Thielemans,³ and Romain A. Pauwels²

¹Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands²Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium³Department of Physiology, Free University Brussels, Jette, Belgium⁴Department of Biology, Inflammation Division, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Address correspondence to: Bart N. Lambrecht, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Room Ee2263, Dr. Molewaterplein 50, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-10-4087703; Fax: 31-10-4089453; E-mail: lambrecht/at/lond.azr.nl.

Received August 10, 1999; Accepted June 7, 2000.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether dendritic cells (DCs) can induce sensitization to aeroallergen in a mouse model of allergic asthma. Ovalbumin-pulsed (OVA-pulsed) or unpulsed myeloid DCs that were injected into the airways of naive mice migrated into the mediastinal lymph nodes. When challenged 2 weeks later with an aerosol of OVA, activated CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes, eosinophils, and neutrophils were recruited to the lungs of actively immunized mice. These CD4⁺ lymphocytes produced predominantly IL-4 and IL-5 but also IFN-γ, whereas CD8⁺ lymphocytes produced predominantly IFN-γ. Histological analysis revealed perivascular and peribronchial eosinophilic infiltrates and goblet cell hyperplasia. Studies in IL-4^–/– and CD28^–/– mice revealed that production of IL-4 by host cells and provision of costimulation to T cells by DCs were critical for inducing the response. Lung CD4⁺ T cells strongly expressed the Th2 marker T1/ST2, and signaling through this molecule via a ligand expressed on DCs was essential for the establishment of airway eosinophilia. These data demonstrate that DCs in the airways induce sensitization to inhaled antigen and that molecules expressed on the surface of these cells are critical for the development of Th2-dependent airway eosinophilia.

Introduction

Allergic asthma is now regarded as a T cell–mediated disorder in which sensitized individuals develop eosinophilic airway inflammation in response to inhalation of aeroallergen (1). T lymphocytes respond to antigen after it has been presented as immunogenic peptides in the context of MHC molecules. Naive T cells proliferate and differentiate in response to T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide-MHC only when accompanied by costimulatory signals (e.g., CD80 and CD86) provided on the surface of professional APCs. It is now clear that the dendritic cell (DC) is the most powerful antigen-presenting cell (APC) for inducing a primary immune response in vivo. It has potent antigen capturing and presenting capacity and readily expresses costimulatory ligands for naive T cells (2). The DC network within the epithelium of the conducting airways is ideally positioned to perform a surveillance role for inhaled antigens/allergens, and as the only resident cell population expressing surface MHC class II in normal (noninflamed) epithelium, the DCs are likely to play an important role in primary allergic sensitization to aeroallergens (3–5). After antigen uptake, airway DCs migrate to the paracortical T-cell zone of the draining lymph nodes (LNs) of the lung, where they interact with naive T cells (6). During this interaction with naive T cells, the DC becomes a reporter of its earlier microenvironment and has the potential to induce a polarized Th1 or Th2 type of response (7). The determining factors by which DCs will induce either a Th1 or a Th2 type of response are multiple and relate to the type of DC presenting the antigen (Ag) (8, 9), their capacity to produce polarizing cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-6 (10), the maturity of the DC network (11), the degree and type of costimulation provided to T cells (12), and the presence of inflammation during Ag encounter (11).

Despite the critical role that DCs might play in the polarization of Th responses in the airways, few studies have examined the contribution of DC to Th2-driven sensitization to aeroallergen. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether and under which conditions injection of Ag-pulsed DCs into the airways leads to sensitization to inhaled Ag and to the development of Ag-induced airway eosinophilia.

Methods

Experimental animals.

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan (Zeist, The Netherlands) and housed under specific pathogen–free conditions in sterile microisolator units. C57BL/6 mice with a targeted mutation of the IL-4 gene (IL4^tm1Cgn), with a targeted mutation of the CD28 gene (CD28^–/–), and control wild-type littermates were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA).

Culture and antigen loading of bone marrow DCs.

DCs were isolated as reported in detail previously (13, 14). Bone marrow was magnetically depleted of CD4⁺, CD8⁺, MHC class II⁺, B220⁺ and Gr-1⁺ cells. Lineage^– cells were grown in medium supplemented with 10 ng/mL of rhFlt3-ligand, 200 ng/mL rmGM-CSF and 1 × 10³ U/mL rmIL-4. For transfer experiments into IL-4–deficient animals, DCs were grown in the absence of exogenous IL-4. After 4 days of culture, cells were placed in serum-free medium (Optimem-1; N.V. Life Technologies SA, Merelbeke, Belgium). At day 9, nonadherent cells were collected and enriched by density centrifugation over metrizamide (14.5% wt/vol; 600 g for 20 minutes; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri, USA). After purification, FACS analysis (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, California, USA) revealed that almost all cells coexpressed MHC class II and the DC marker CD11c; greater than 95% expressed the costimulatory molecules CD86, HSA, CD44, and ICAM-1, and approximately 50% expressed CD80 as reported in detail previously (14).

In initial experiments, purified DCs were incubated for 2 hours with 100 μg/mL of ovalbumin (OVA) (grade V; Sigma Chemical Co.) or, as a control, with medium alone, followed by extensive washing to remove free OVA. In later experiments, the OVA-pulsing period was performed overnight, leading to enhanced immunostimulatory capacity (see later here).

Intratracheal injection of DCs.

Mice were anesthetized (avertin 2.5% wt/vol in PBS), and 80 μL of cell suspension was injected intratracheally, using the technique of Ho and Furst (15). To study the distribution of injected DCs, cells were labeled with the green fluorescent dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidylester (CFSE; Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, Oregon, USA), essentially as described elsewhere (6). A total of 1 × 10⁶ DCs were instilled intratracheally into naive mice and traced 12 hours, 36 hours, and 120 hours later in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue, and mediastinal and inguinal LNs. Lungs were first perfused via the right ventricle using PBS, followed by BAL (see later here). Excised tissues were minced, incubated for 90 minutes in 100 U/mL collagenase IV (N.V. Life Technologies SA) and 0.02 mg/mL DNaseI (Sigma Chemical Co.), and CFSE⁺ CD11c⁺ DC were enumerated using flow cytometry.

Immunization with antigen-pulsed DCs and secondary exposure to antigen aerosol.

On day 0, groups of mice (n = 6–8 per group) were immunized by intratracheal instillation of either 1 × 10⁶, 1 × 10⁵, or 1 × 10⁴ OVA-DCs. As a control, a group of mice received 1 × 10⁶ control PBS-DCs. From day 14 to day 20, mice were exposed either to seven OVA aerosols (10 mg/mL; grade III in PBS) or seven PBS aerosols, on consecutive days for 30 minutes daily (5).

Treatment with mAb’s.

To study the effect on sensitization of blocking the interaction of T1/ST2 with its ligand, 50 μg of purified rat mAb 3E10, recognizing the T1/ST2 molecule on Th2 cells (16) was injected intratracheally simultaneously with OVA-DCs at day 0. Rat IgG1 was used as a control. In separate experiments, mice received 30 μg of T1/ST2-Ig fusion protein that directly competes with membrane-bound T1/ST2 for binding with its putative ligand and hence blocks T1/ST2 signaling (16). Human Ig (hu-Ig) was used as control.

BAL.

Twenty-four hours after the last aerosol exposure, mice were killed and BAL was performed (5). The BALF was centrifuged, cells were counted, and supernatant was stored. Differential cell counts were performed on cytospin preparations stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa. Aliquots of 2 × 10⁵ cells were prepared for flow cytometry.

Flow cytometry.

The following antibodies were used to stain cells obtained from BALF and/or LNs: CD3ε-PECy5, CD4-FITC, CD8α-PE, CD25-PE, CD69-PE, T1/ST2 (3E10, rat IgG1). On bone marrow DC preparations, we used I-A^b,d-FITC, CD11c-bi, CD80-PE, CD86-PE, CD44-PE, HSA-PE, ICAM-1-PE, and B-cell mAb CD45R-PE (B220). Antibodies were obtained commercially from PharMingen (San Diego, California, USA) or were from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, USA). Biotinylated antibodies were detected using streptavidin-PECy5 (Quantum Red; Sigma Chemical Co.). Unconjugated rat mAb’s were detected by secondary goat anti-rat IgG-PE (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pennsylvania, USA). Expression of the T1/ST2-ligand on DC was demonstrated by binding of T1/ST2-Ig fusion protein, followed by anti-human IgG1-FITC (16). Samples were analyzed on a FACS-Vantage flow cytometer using Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems).

For the single-cell detection of intracellular cytokines, BALF cells were stimulated for 5 hours at 3 × 10⁶ cells/mL in plates coated with anti-CD3 antibody (2 μg/mL of 145-2C11 antibody), in the presence of anti-CD28 mAb to provide costimulation, or with PMA/ionomycin (17). After 2 hours, monensin (2 μM; PharMingen) was added. After washing, cells were incubated with 2.4G2, followed by surface staining for CD3-PECy5 and CD4-FITC. Fixation, permeabilization, and staining for intracellular cytokines was performed using anti–IFN-γ-allophycocyanin (XMG1.2), anti–IL-4-PE (11B11), and anti–IL-5-allophycocyanin (TRFK-5) mAb’s, according to PharMingen’s protocol. Samples were analyzed on a FACScalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems).

Cytokine measurements.

The cytokine content in unconcentrated BALF was determined using ELISA (IFN-γ Quantikine M; R&D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom; IL-4 from Biotrak, Life Science, Amersham, United Kingdom). Ex vivo production of cytokines by lymphocytes taken from mediastinal and inguinal LNs 24 hours after the last aerosol challenge was measured after restimulation at 2 × 10⁶ cells/mL in the presence or absence of 10 μg/mL of OVA, as described by others previously (18). After 96 hours of culture, supernatant was assayed for IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-γ content using ELISA (OptiEIA; PharMingen).

Airway histology.

After BAL was performed, fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in PBS) was gently infused through the lavage catheter under pressure and volume controlled conditions. The resected lungs were fixed for an additional 4 hours and paraffin embedded. Four-micrometer sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; ref. 5).

Measurement of serum OVA-IgE.

Blood was drawn by cardiac puncture for measurement of serum OVA-IgE by isotype-specific ELISA (5).

Statistical analysis.

Comparison of means between different groups was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired data using the Spreadware Statistics (Spreadware, Palm Desert, California, USA) statistical package. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Results

Injected DCs home to the mediastinal LNs.

At various time points after intratracheal injection, we studied the distribution of CFSE-labeled DCs. By 12 hours after instillation, CFSE⁺DCs could be detected in BALF (14.10 ± 2.99% of cells), digested lung tissue (0.17 ± 0.04% of cells), and draining mediastinal LNs (0.012 ± 0.005%). No CFSE⁺ DCs could be detected in inguinal LNs. As shown in Figure Figure1a,1a, by 36 hours DCs had further migrated to the mediastinal LNs (0.07 ± 0.01%) and gradually disappeared from the BALF (5.83 ± 0.88%). The number and kinetics of DC migrating into the draining LNs are shown in Figure Figure1b.1b. Although by 120 hours, a majority of injected cells had disappeared, some CFSE⁺ DCs could still be detected in all compartments (1.34 ± 0.15% of BAL; 0.04 ± 0.01% for lung; and 0.016 ± 0.006% for LN).

Figure 1

(a) Localization of CFSE⁺ DC 36 hours after intratracheal injection of 1 × 10⁶ DCs into naive mice. DC were identified in BALF, digested lung tissue, and mediastinal and inguinal LNs as CD3^–B220^– cells of low autofluorescence, (more ...)

Effect of aerosol exposure on airway inflammation in animals immunized with DCs.

Analysis on BALF cells revealed that seven OVA aerosol exposures induced a significant increase in total cell counts, mononuclear cells, eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes in mice that were immunized with 1 × 10⁶ OVA-DCs, compared with animals immunized with PBS-DC (Figure (Figure2a;2a; P < 0.05). Aerosolization with PBS in OVA-DC–immunized mice did not induce significant changes in BALF compared with PBS-DC/PBS–exposed animals or PBS-DC/OVA–exposed animals. Immunization with 1 × 10⁵ OVA-DC and subsequent exposure to OVA aerosol induced an increase in BALF lymphocytes only, whereas immunization with 1 × 10⁴ OVA-DC induced no significant response (data not shown). All subsequent immunizations were therefore performed using 1 × 10⁶ cells.

Figure 2

Effect of OVA exposure on the cellular composition of BALF in animals immunized with DCs. On day 0, mice were immunized by intratracheal administration of 1 × 10⁶ OVA-DCs or control PBS-DCs. On days 14–20, mice were exposed to 30 minutes (more ...)

As studied by flow cytometry and shown in Figure Figure2b,2b, exposure to OVA aerosol in OVA-DC mice induced a significant increase in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells compared with PBS exposure. In the absence of secondary OVA exposure, there was no difference in total CD3⁺ T-cells or T-cell subsets in animals immunized with OVA-DC compared with those immunized with PBS-DC. The early activation marker CD69 was expressed on 62.9 ± 3.2% of CD4⁺ T cells, and the late activation marker CD25 (IL-2R) was expressed on 34.0 ± 3.5% of CD4⁺ T cells in the OVA-DC/OVA group compared with 11.5 ± 0.9% and 5.4 ± 0.8%, respectively, in the PBS-DC/PBS group (P < 0.05).

Lung sections from OVA-DC mice exposed to PBS aerosol (data not shown) or PBS-DC mice exposed to OVA (Figure (Figure3a)3a) or PBS aerosol demonstrated no pathological changes. In contrast, histological analysis of lung tissue from OVA-DC/OVA–exposed mice revealed intense multifocal eosinophilic lesions localized mainly in the peribronchial submucosa, but also marked in the perivascular area (Figure (Figure3b).3b). The vascular wall was grossly edematous, and in some inflamed blood vessels, eosinophils were seen to adhere to vascular endothelium. Epithelial changes of goblet cell hyperplasia were readily seen (Figure (Figure33c).

Figure 3

Effect of OVA exposure on lung histology in animals immunized with DCs. Mice were treated as in Figure Figure2.2. At 24 hours after the last aerosol, lungs were fixed and processed for histological analysis. H&E staining. ×400. (more ...)

Effect of aerosol exposure on cytokine levels in animals immunized with DCs.

The type of Th response being induced by DCs was determined. As shown in Figure Figure4a,4a, OVA exposure in OVA-DC mice induced a specific twofold increase in the amount of IL-4 detected in BALF, compared with that detected in PBS-DC/PBS mice (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the amount of IFN-γ detectable in BALF. Levels of IL-5 were below the detection limit of our assay.

Figure 4

Measurement of cytokine levels in unconcentrated BALF and after in vitro restimulation of LN cells with specific antigen. Mice were treated as in Figure Figure2.2. Groups are coded as immunization/exposure. (a) BALF was taken 24 hours after the (more ...)

In vitro restimulation of LN cells (Figure (Figure4,4, b and c) with OVA demonstrated that mediastinal lymphocytes from OVA-DC/OVA mice produced 27 times more IL-4 (747.4 ± 16.9 vs. 27.2 ± 0.1 pg/mL; P < 0.05), 1.8 times more IL-5 (3,120.2 ± 13.3 vs. 1,698.6 ± 48.6 pg/mL; P < 0.05), and equal amounts of IFN-γ (580 ± 63.6 vs. 876.6 ± 172 pg/mL; P > 0.05) compared with those from PBS-DC/PBS mice. In nondraining LNs, levels of all cytokines were identical between OVA-DC/OVA and PBS-DC/PBS mice.

To investigate whether OVA exposure in OVA-DC mice led to selective infiltration of the lungs with lymphocytes producing either Th1- or Th2-type cytokines, intracellular staining for cytokines was performed on BALF cells (Figure (Figure5).5). Data on percentage expression on CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells in OVA-DC/OVA and PBS-DC/PBS mice are summarized in Table Table1.1. Simultaneous staining for IL-5 and IFN-γ was not performed in the PBS-DC/PBS group, due to lower cell yield in this group.

Figure 5

Intracellular detection of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-5 in lymphocytes from BALF of OVA-DC/OVA mice. As described in Methods, cells were stained for IFN-γ (a and b), IL-4 (a), IL-5 (b), and isotype controls (c). Dot plots shown were gated on (more ...)

Table 1

Intracellular staining for cytokines on T cells obtained from BAL

To study the functional role of IL-4 in this model, DCs were grown from wild-type donors in the absence of exogenous IL-4, and transferred into IL-4^+/+ or IL-4^–/– mice. Aerosolization with OVA after immunization with OVA-DC induced airway eosinophilia in IL-4^+/+ mice (47.7 ± 4.75% of BALF cells) but not in IL-4^–/– mice (0.2 ± 0.14% of cells). It should be noted that in this experiment, the percentage of BALF eosinophilia in the OVA-DC/OVA group was considerably higher than the 13.6 ± 1.9% in our initial experiments reported in Figure Figure2a.2a. This can be explained by a prolongation of the OVA-pulsing period, which was initially 2 hours before adoptive transfer and was subsequently prolonged to an overnight pulsing in our later experiments (see Methods). The analysis of BALF of wild-type mice immunized with OVA-DC obtained from IL4^–/– or IL4^+/+ donors revealed a similar degree of airway eosinophilia in both groups (data not shown).

Role of signaling through T1/ST2.

T1/ST2 is a surface marker known to be differentially expressed on Th2 cells (16, 19, 20). The expression of T1/ST2 on CD4⁺ T cells in BALF and in mediastinal and inguinal LNs was investigated after seven aerosol exposures in OVA-DC or PBS-DC mice. The frequency of T1/ST2-expressing CD4⁺ cells was highest in BALF (62.0 ± 3.8% in OVA-DC/OVA vs. 8.4 ± 1.5% in PBS-DC/PBS mice (Figure (Figure6a).6a). This decreased to 13.6% of CD4⁺ T cells in the mediastinal LNs of OVA-DC/OVA mice (versus 3.5% in PBS-DC/PBS mice). In nondraining inguinal LNs, the expression of T1/ST2 was the lowest and similar in both groups (2.9% vs. 2.7% respectively). T1/ST2 was only weakly expressed on CD3⁺CD4^– T cells (i.e., CD8⁺ T cells). We next determined the expression of a putative ligand for T1/ST2 on DC grown from our bone marrow cultures. As the ligand for murine T1/ST2 has not been cloned, no antibodies that directly stain the T1/ST2 ligand are available. We have previously cloned the extracellular domain of T1/ST2 into a vector containing the human IgG1 constant region, generating an expressed soluble T1/ST2-Ig fusion protein (16). As seen in Figure Figure6b,6b, DCs bound T1/ST2-Ig weakly but consistently, suggesting the expression of a ligand for T1/ST2.

Figure 6

(a) T1/ST2 expression on BALF cells. Mice were immunized with OVA-DC and subsequently challenged with OVA as described in Methods. Control mice (PBS) were immunized with PBS-DC and challenged with PBS. Single-cell suspensions were surface stained with (more ...)

We investigated the functional contribution of T1/ST2 to the establishment of eosinophilic airway inflammation by giving either anti-T1/ST2 mAb (3E10) or T1/ST2-Ig during the period of intratracheal injection of DCs. Control animals received either rat IgG or hu-Ig. The intratracheal injection of either 3E10 (Figure (Figure7a)7a) or T1/ST2-Ig (Figure (Figure7b)7b) at the time of sensitization by OVA-DC blocked the development of OVA-induced airway eosinophilia. Moreover, total numbers of monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes were significantly reduced. These changes were also apparent on histological analysis (data not shown).

Figure 7

Effect of blocking the interaction of T1/ST2 with its ligand during sensitization by OVA-DC on the development of eosinophilic inflammation. (a) On day 0 of the experiment, mice received an intratracheal injection of 1 × 10⁶ OVA-DC simultaneously (more ...)

Role of costimulation through CD28 on T cells.

The development of Th2 responses has been shown to depend on strong costimulation provided by CD80/CD86 on APCs to CD28 on T cells (21). DCs were purified from CD28^+/+ donors and pulsed overnight with 100 μg/mL of OVA. As expected, immunization with 0.5 × 10⁶ OVA-DC and subsequent exposure to OVA aerosol induced an eosinophilic response in the airways of CD28^+/+ mice (32.2 ± 17.7 × 10⁴ eosinophils/lavage) (Figure (Figure8a).8a). However, this eosinophilic response was completely suppressed in CD28^–/– mice (1.13 ± 1.1 × 10⁴ eosinophils/lavage). The absence of eosinophilia in CD28^–/– mice was also apparent from histological analysis (data not shown). Despite these dramatic differences, the number of CD3⁺ T cells in BALF was identical between groups (0.6 ± 0.1 × 10⁵ in CD28^+/+ versus 0.4 ± 0.2 × 10⁵ in CD28^–/–). The number of CD4⁺ cells expressing CD25 and T1/ST2 was, however, markedly reduced (13.8 ± 1.9% vs. 4.0 ± 1.6% and 14.5 ± 4.6% vs. 2.0 ± 0.4%, respectively) in CD28^–/– mice. To determine the type of Th response induced in the absence of CD28, we measured cytokine levels after in vitro restimulation with OVA of T cells from draining LNs of OVA-DC/OVA mice. The levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 were significantly lower in CD28^–/– mice (1,050 ± 67.5 pg/mL and 32 ± 3 pg/mL, respectively) compared with CD28^+/+ mice (5,441 ± 1,742 pg/mL and 80 ± 44 pg/mL, respectively. The levels of IL-5 were lower in CD28^–/– (640 ± 60 pg/mL) than in CD28^+/+ mice (877 ± 354 pg/mL), but this did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, intracellular staining for cytokines after polyclonal activation with PMA/ionomycin revealed that individual CD4⁺ T cells obtained from BALF of OVA-DC/OVA mice produced either IFN-γ or IL-4 in CD28^+/+ mice and that the percentage expression of IL-4 in individual cells was not affected by knockout of the CD28 gene (Figure (Figure8b).8b). However, the percentage expression of IFN-γ in CD28^–/– T cells was almost twice as high compared with CD28^+/+ cells.

Figure 8

Effect of absence of CD28 on the development of OVA-induced eosinophilic airway inflammation. On day 0, CD28^+/+ and CD28^–/– mice received 5 × 10⁵ OVA-DC from wild-type mice. Mice were subsequently exposed to OVA (more ...)

Discussion

In an attempt to define the role of DCs in the regulation of lung mucosal immunity, we have injected antigen-pulsed myeloid DCs into the trachea of naive mice. During the afferent phase of the pulmonary immune response, Ag is deposited into the deeper airways and captured by endogenous APCs, which transport it into the draining LNs (3, 6, 22). In our system, CFSE-labeled DC could be traced in BALF and draining mediastinal LNs already 12 hours after injection into the trachea, but not in nondraining LN or spleen (data not shown). By 36 hours after injection, labeled DCs started to disappear from the BAL compartment, consistent with a further migration into the draining LNs. In agreement with data from subcutaneous injection of DCs, the majority of migrated DCs had disappeared from the draining LNs by 120 hours after injection, although significant numbers of cells were retained in all compartments of the lung studied (23). Using the same model of adoptive transfer of DCs into the trachea, we have recently demonstrated that migrated DCs interact with naive T cells in the mediastinal LNs during the so-called central processing phase of the adaptive pulmonary immune response, leading to lymphocyte division and generation of effector cells (6). The time course and distribution of this primary T-cell response are highly reminiscent of the kinetics and direction of migration of DCs, as T-cell division occurs before 48 hours and is restricted to the mediastinal lymph nodes. This restricted migration of DCs into the mediastinal LNs of the lung leads to a compartmentalized immune response (22).

During the effector phase of the immune response, effector T cells are recruited into the lung and again stimulated by DCs to release cytokines and orchestrate airway inflammation (5, 24). The occurrence and the nature of the secondary effector response reflects the character of the primary response and the development of polarized Th1 or Th2 responses during the central processing phase (25). Challenge with aerosolized OVA in mice that were immunized by intratracheal injection of OVA-DC, led to the accumulation of activated CD4⁺ T lymphocytes in the airways and to eosinophilic airway inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia, both characteristic of allergic asthma. As the development of goblet cell hyperplasia and eosinophilic airway inflammation is clearly dependent on IL-4 receptor signaling and local IL-5 production by CD4⁺ T cells, respectively (26), we speculated that a Th2-dominated response was induced by intratracheal injection of DCs. Supporting this hypothesis, we measured increased levels of Th2 but not Th1 cytokines in BALF of OVA-DC/OVA mice compared with PBS-DC/PBS mice. Moreover, when lymphocytes of the draining mediastinal LNs of OVA-DC/OVA mice were restimulated with specific Ag, they similarly produced increased levels of IL4 and IL-5 and identical levels of IFN-γ compared with controls. These high levels of Th2 cytokine production were mainly seen in the LNs draining the lung, again suggesting the presence of a very compartmentalized immune response. Intracellular staining for cytokines on individual BALF CD3⁺ T lymphocytes revealed that CD4⁺ lymphocytes were the predominant cellular source of IL-4 and IL-5. However, enhanced numbers of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells producing only IFN-γ were also clearly detected in BALF. This suggests that eosinophilic inflammation in mice is characterized by an expansion of CD4⁺ Th2 cells, without selectively abrogating Th1 cells. Similarly, in addition to an increased number of IL-4– and IL-5–producing cells, a population of IFN-γ–producing CD4⁺ T cells has been demonstrated in BALF from asthmatic subjects (27). A final argument for the induction of a specific Th2 response by DC was the total absence of the eosinophilic response in mice genetically lacking IL-4. By blocking IL-4 with antibodies at various time points of the response, we have previously shown that the absence of IL-4 mainly affects the development of Th2 responses during the central processing phase (i.e., sensitization), whereas the effector phase is not affected (28, 29).

Despite the high levels of IL-4 measured, we could not detect significant levels of OVA-specific IgE production in the serum of OVA-DC/OVA–exposed mice. This is not surprising, as we immunized the mice by injection of OVA-pulsed DCs, in the absence of free OVA antigen. As such, no free antigen was available for stimulation of naive B cells. Other protocols in which protein-specific Th2-dependent immunoglobulins were detected after injection of DCs included the injection of a booster of soluble protein (11, 30).

Despite the known functional dichotomy of murine Th responses into Th1- or Th2-cytokine–secreting subsets, few surface molecules can discriminate between them (16, 20). The T1/ST2 orphan receptor was found to be differentially expressed on Th2 clones and on recently differentiated Th2 cells in vitro (16, 20). The T1/ST2 belongs to the IL-1 receptor superfamily and does not bind to any of its known ligands (31). It was recently demonstrated that IL-4–, IL-5–, and IL-10–producing CD4⁺ T cells isolated from granulomas induced by Schistosoma mansoni eggs express T1/ST2 in vivo (19). Similarly, BALF and mediastinal CD4⁺ T cells expressed T1/ST2 in OVA-DC/OVA animals, whereas T cells from a distant site did not. This strongly suggested that T1/ST2 expression in vivo colocalized with the compartmentalized Th2-dominated immune response. In addition to its role as a marker for Th2 cells, we and others have recently described that signaling through T1/ST2 is critical for Th2 development and effector function in vitro and in vivo (16, 32, 33), although some controversy exists as to the exact role of T1/ST2 in Th development (34). To address this further, we analyzed whether DC-induced Th2 development in the airways was inhibited by blocking the interaction of T1/ST2 with its (unknown) ligand. By injecting blocking antibodies or T1/ST2-Ig fusion protein at the time of injection of DCs, the sensitization to inhaled antigen was completely suppressed. This strongly suggested the functional expression of a ligand for T1/ST2 on DCs, as shown by weak binding of the T1/ST2-Ig protein. A putative ligand has also been identified on other APC types such as B cells and follicular DCs (35). Definite molecular proof of expression on these cells, as well as studies on its regulation, will await molecular cloning of the ligand for murine T1/ST2.

The strong expression of costimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86 is one of the features discriminating lung DCs from other APCs such as B cells and macrophages (36). It is controversial at present whether signaling through CD28 by either of these ligands affects the potential of T cells to develop into either Th1 or Th2 cells (37, 38). It has been suggested that the induction of Th2 responses in vitro and in vivo depends on the delivery of a strong costimulus by the APC to naive T cells (38). We therefore hypothesized that Th2 development and eosinophilia induced by DC would be absent in mice with a disrupted CD28 gene. Although we found that airway eosinophilia was completely abrogated, the number of BALF T cells induced by OVA aerosol was identical between CD28^–/– and wild-type mice. By analogy, recent work in a S. mansoni–induced model of airway inflammation has shown that CD28 deficiency abolishes airway eosinophilia but does not affect the initial recruitment of T cells into Ag-challenged airways (39). The absence of airway eosinophilia in CD28^–/– mice could be due to defective Th2 priming or to defective generation of effector function in Th2 cells during challenge of the airways. Studies using either CTLA-4Ig or blocking anti-CD80 and CD86 mAb’s have indeed shown that costimulation via the CD80/86-CD28 pathway is essential during both the central processing and the effector phases of the immune response leading to airway eosinophilia (39–41). To clarify this point, lung effector CD4⁺ T cells of CD28^–/– mice were restimulated in a costimulation-independent fashion using PMA/ionomycin and studied for single-cell expression of cytokines. We found a normal capacity of these cells to produce IL-4 with an increased tendency to produce IFN-γ, indicating that the priming of Th2 cells by DCs was unaltered in CD28^–/– mice. However, when LN T cells were restimulated with OVA in a costimulation-dependent assay, levels of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines were grossly diminished in CD28^–/– mice. We therefore favor the hypothesis that airway eosinophilia was abolished mainly by a defective activation of effector T cells in the lung of CD28^–/– mice. Consistent with this, we observed a reduced expression of the activation marker CD25 on CD4⁺ T cells in CD28^–/– mice.

In conclusion, DCs induce Th2-dominated sensitization to inhaled Ag, leading to eosinophilic airway inflammation. These results and our findings that DCs are essential for the maintenance of airway eosinophilia suggest that these cells are critical to the pathogenesis of asthma (5, 24). Therefore, interacting with DC function is a therapeutic option for this disease.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Concerted Research Initiative of the University of Ghent (G.O.A. 98-6) and by the Fund for Scientific Research Vlaanderen (G.0393.99). We gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of G. Barbier, K. De Saedeleer, M. Gosselin, and S. Lin. The Inflammation Division of Millenium Pharmaceuticals is supported by Astra Pharmaceuticals.

References

1. Robinson DR, et al. Predominant Th2-like bronchoalveolar T lymphocyte population in atopic asthma. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:298–304. [PubMed]

2. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392:245–252. [PubMed]

3. Holt PG, Schon-Hegrad MA, Oliver J. MHC class II antigen-bearing dendritic cells in pulmonary tissues of the rat (regulation of antigen presentation activity by endogenous macrophage populations) J Exp Med. 1988;167:262–274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

4. Schon-Hegrad MA, Oliver J, McMenamin PG, Holt PG. Studies on the density, distribution and surface phenotype of intraepithelial class II major histocompatibility complex antigen (Ia)–bearing dendritic cells (DC) in the conducting airways. J Exp Med. 1991;173:1345–1356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Lambrecht BN, Salomon B, Klatzmann D, Pauwels RA. Dendritic cells are required for the development of chronic eosinophilic airway inflammation in response to inhaled antigen in sensitized mice. J Immunol. 1998;160:4090–4097. [PubMed]

6. Lambrecht BN, Pauwels RA, Fazekas de St.Groth B. Induction of rapid T cell activation, division and recirculation by intratracheal injection of dendritic cells in a TCR-transgenic model. J Immunol. 2000;164:2937–2946. [PubMed]

7. Kalinski P, Schuitemaker JH, Hilkens CM, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML. Final maturation of dendritic cells is associated with impaired responsiveness to IFN-gamma and to bacterial IL-12 inducers: decreased ability of mature dendritic cells to produce IL-12 during the interaction with Th cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:3231–3236. [PubMed]

8. Maldonado-Lopez R, et al. CD8alpha+ and CD8alpha- subclasses of dendritic cells direct the development of distinct T helper cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 1999;189:587–592. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

9. Rissoan MC, et al. Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science. 1999;283:1183–1186. [PubMed]

10. Macatonia SE, et al. Dendritic cells produce IL-12 and direct the development of Th1 cells from naive CD4(+) T cells. J Immunol. 1995;154:5071–5079. [PubMed]

11. Stumbles PA, et al. Resting respiratory tract dendritic cells preferentially stimulate T helper cell type 2 (Th2) responses and require obligatory cytokine signals for induction of Th1 immunity. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2019–2031. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

12. De Becker G, et al. Regulation of T helper cell differentiation in vivo by soluble and membrane proteins provided by antigen-presenting cells. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:3161–3171. [PubMed]

13. De Veerman M, et al. Retrovirally transduced bone marrow-derived dendritic cells require cognate CD4+ T cell help to elicit protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 1999;162:144–151. [PubMed]

14. Lambrecht BN, et al. Endogenously produced substance P contributes to lymphocyte proliferation induced by dendritic cells and direct TCR ligation. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:3815–3825. [PubMed]

15. Ho W, Furst A. Intratracheal instillation method for mouse lungs. Oncology. 1973;27:385–393. [PubMed]

16. Lohning M, et al. T1/ST2 is preferentially expressed on murine Th2 cells, independent of interleukin 4, interleukin 5, and interleukin 10, and important for Th2 effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6930–6935. [PubMed]

17. Harding FA, McArthur JG, Gross JA, Raulet DH, Allison JP. CD28-mediated signalling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T-cell clones. Nature. 1992;356:607–609. [PubMed]

18. Van Oosterhout AJ, et al. Allergen immunotherapy inhibits airway eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness associated with decreased IL-4 production by lymphocytes in a murine model of allergic asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;19:622–628. [PubMed]

19. Lohning M, et al. T1/ST2 expression is enhanced on CD4+ T cells from schistosome egg–induced granulomas: analysis of Th cell cytokine coexpression ex vivo. J Immunol. 1999;162:3882–3889. [PubMed]

20. Xu D, et al. Selective expression of a stable cell surface molecule on type 2 but not type 1 helper T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;187:787–794. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

21. Bluestone JA. New perspectives of CD28-B7–mediated T cell costimulation. Immunity. 1995;2:555–559. [PubMed]

22. Xia WJ, Pinto CE, Kradin RL. The antigen-presenting activities of Ia+ dendritic cells shift dynamically from lung to lymph node after an airway challenge with soluble antigen. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1275–1283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

23. Hermans IF, Ritchie DS, Yang J, Roberts JM, Ronchese F. CD8+ T cell–dependent elimination of dendritic cells in vivo limits the induction of antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 2000;164:3095–3101. [PubMed]

24. Lambrecht BN, Carro-Muino I, Vermaelen K, Pauwels RA. Allergen-induced changes in bone-marrow progenitor and airway dendritic cells in sensitized rats. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;20:1165–1174. [PubMed]

25. Lambrecht BN, Peleman RA, Bullock GR, Pauwels RA. Sensitization to inhaled antigen by intratracheal instillation of dendritic cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:214–224. [PubMed]

26. Hogan SP, Koskinen A, Matthaei KI, Young IG, Foster PS. Interleukin-5–producing CD4 T cells play a pivotal role in aeroallergen-induced eosinophilia, bronchial hyperreactivity, and lung damage in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:210–218. [PubMed]

27. Krug N, et al. T-cell cytokine profile evaluated at the single cell level in BAL and blood in allergic asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;14:319–326. [PubMed]

28. Brusselle GG, Kips JC, Joos GF, Bluethmann H, Pauwels RA. Allergen-induced airway inflammation and bronchial responsiveness in wild-type and interleukin-4-deficient mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1995;12:254–259. [PubMed]

29. Coyle AJ, et al. Interleukin-4 is required for the induction of lung Th2 mucosal immunity. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1995;13:54–59. [PubMed]

30. Sornasse T, et al. Antigen pulsed dendritic cells can efficiently induce an antibody response in vivo. J Exp Med. 1992;175:15–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

31. Mitcham JL, et al. T1/ST2 signaling establishes it as a member of an expanding interleukin-1 receptor family. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5777–5783. [PubMed]

32. Coyle AJ, et al. Crucial role of the interleukin 1 receptor family member T1/ST2 in T helper cell type 2–mediated lung mucosal immune responses. J Exp Med. 1999;190:895–902. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

33. Townsend MJ, Fallon PG, Matthews DJ, Jolin HE, McKenzie AN. T1/ST2-deficient mice demonstrate the importance of T1/ST2 in developing primary T helper cell type 2 responses. J Exp Med. 2000;191:1069–1076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

34. Hoshino K, et al. The absence of interleukin 1 receptor–related T1/ST2 does not affect T helper cell type 2 development and its effector function. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1541–1548. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

35. Gayle MA, et al. Cloning of a putative ligand for the T1/ST2 receptor. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5784–5789. [PubMed]

36. Masten BJ, Lipscomb MF. Comparison of lung dendritic cells and B cells in stimulating naive antigen-specific T cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:1310–1317. [PubMed]

37. Brown DR, et al. Limited role of CD28-mediated signals in T-helper subset differentiation. J Exp Med. 1996;184:803–810. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

38. Rulifson IC, Sperling A, Fields PE, Fitch FW, Bluestone JA. CD28 costimulation promotes the production of Th2 cytokines. J Immunol. 1997;158:658–665. [PubMed]

39. Mathur M, et al. CD28 interactions with either CD80 or CD86 are sufficient to induce allergic airway inflammation in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;21:498–509. [PubMed]

40. Harris N, et al. CD80 costimulation is essential for the induction of airway eosinophilia. J Exp Med. 1997;185:177–182. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

41. Tsuyuki S, Tsuyuki J, Einsle K, Kopf M, Coyle AJ. Costimulation through B7-2 (CD86) is required for the induction of a lung mucosal T helper cell 2 (TH2) immune response and altered airway responsiveness. J Exp Med. 1997;185:1671–1679. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Clinical Investigation