PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Hepatol Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 October 17.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3798039
NIHMSID: NIHMS515571

Generation of a cholangiocyte-specific cDNA expression library for the identification of B and T cell autoantigens in murine biliary disease

Abstract

Aim

Several mouse models of inflammatory cholangiopathies exist, including biliary atresia, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. In an ongoing effort to identify the target antigens of both infiltrating autoreactive T cells and serum autoantibodies, we aimed to generate a cholangiocyte-derived cDNA library capable of expressing a wide variety of proteins.

Methods

mRNA was isolated from a normal mouse cholangiocyte cell line and reverse transcribed into cDNA. After initial cloning of the cDNA into a transfer vector (pDONR222), the entire library was shuttled into an Escherichia coli expression vector (pDEST160).

Results

The library contains 2.3 × 106 independent clones and expresses proteins up to 100 kD in molecular weight. Using a variety of techniques, including western blot analysis, mass spectrometry of individual clones, and direct DNA sequencing of plasmids, a number of both ubiquitously expressed and cholangiocyte-specific proteins (e.g. cytokeratin 19) have been identified within.

Conclusion

A comprehensive mouse cholangiocyte cDNA expression library has been generated and is available for use as a source of multiple cholangiocyte-specific antigens for immunological studies. The library can be used to screen for specificity of T cell lines or hybridomas. Furthermore, this library has potential uses in SEREX analysis of autoantibody reactivity. The cholangiocyte-specific cDNA library is a powerful tool for the identification of target antigens in murine inflammatory cholangiopathies and is available as a shared resource.

Keywords: autoimmune response, bile duct diseases, cDNA library, serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression libraries

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune diseases of the bile duct, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC),13 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC),1,4,5 and autoimmune cholangitis5 are likely to be the result of autoantigen-specific reactivities of T and/or B lymphocytes. Evidence exists that biliary atresia (BA) may also involve autoimmune-mediated bile duct injury.6,7 Recent investigations have demonstrated bile duct-targeted autoreactive T cells in BA mice8,9 and serum autoantibodies, including α-enolase autoantibodies.7 However, the exact cholangiocyte protein targets of the T cells and the many other serum autoantibodies has yet to be elucidated. The ability to determine what cholangiocyte proteins are targeted would greatly affect the ability of researchers to understand the progression of disease in BA as well as other inflammatory cholangiopathies.

A useful tool in identifying potential mouse cholangiocyte autoantigens would be an expression cDNA library representing multiple proteins present in cholangiocytes. These proteins could then be assayed for their reactivity to serum from antoantibody-producing mice by serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression libraries (SEREX).10 SEREX has emerged as a powerful tool in identification of novel autoantigens in both cancer and autoimmune disease.1113 In addition to tracking the humoral response, these proteins can also be used to identify T-cell antigens in autoimmune disease.14 Total murine liver cDNA libraries are currently commercially available, but as cholangiocytes are only 3% of the total mass of the liver,15 the overwhelming majority of antigens present in those libraries are not cholangiocyte specific. In order to ensure that cholangiocyte autoantigens would be adequately represented, we generated an expression cDNA library using a normal mouse cholangiocyte cell line as the source of mRNA.

METHODS

Isolation of cholangiocyte RNA and production of cDNA library

Mrna from an sv40 large T antigen-immortalized normal mouse cholangiocyte cell line (NMC, gift of Y. Ueno) was extracted with a Fast-Track 2.0 kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Purified mRNA was converted to cDNA following the protocol of the Clone-Miner cDNA library construction kit (Invitrogen). Following ligation of recombination adapters, cDNA was cloned into the Gateway vector pDONR222. The library was analyzed for average insert size by restriction enzyme digestion of individual clones with BsrG1 (New England Biolabs). Titer of initial library was determined by plating dilutions of library on LB plates containing carbenicillin (50 µg/mL) and performing colony counts.

Transfer of cDNA library to expression vector

Library was transferred via site-specific recombination to the Escherichia coli expression vector pET160-DEST following the protocol of the Champion pET Gateway Expression Kit (Invitrogen). Library was electroporated into E.cloni EXPRESS BL21 cells (Lucigen, Middleton, WI, USA). Library in pET160 was amplified in semisolid culture as follows. Two liters of 2xLB, 0.3%w/v SeaPrep agarose (FMC) was inoculated with 2 × 106 primary transformants and allowed to solidify in an ice bath. Media was transferred to 30° and incubated for 48 h. Bacteria-containing media was then centrifuged and the resulting cells were titered as above and frozen in 2x LB containing 12.5% glycerol.

Western blot analysis of library proteins

Protein expression from clones was induced by adding isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (1 mM) to exponentially growing cultures and harvesting cells 4 h later. Cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM KH2PO4, 400 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Triton X-100. Lysates were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 4–16% NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen) and visualized by staining with Lumio Detection Reagents (Invitrogen). Lysates were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane for western blot analysis. The following antibodies were used: TROMA (rat anti-mouse CK19) (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, IA, USA), rabbit anti-HNF4α (Assay Biotech, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and rabbit anti-OSTα (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rat IgG-HRP (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA) and goat anti-rabbit IgG-horse radish peroxidase (HRP) (Invitrogen). Bands were visualized using Western Lightning Plus ECL reagents (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).

DNA sequencing and mass spectrometry analysis of library clones

Individual NMC library clones were grown in LB media containing carbenicillin (50 µg/mL). Library proteins were isolated for mass spectrometry analysis by 4 h of IPTG induction of individual clones. Lysates were separated on a 4–16% NuPage gel and visualized with Lumio Detection reagents as above. Fluorescent bands were dissected from the gel and analyzed by the UC Denver Cancer Center Mass Spectrometry core facility. Plasmid DNA was purified using the QiaPrep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and sequenced using a T7 promoter primer by the UC Denver Cancer Center DNA sequencing core facility.

RESULTS

Assessment of cholangiocyte cDNA library quality

An expression cDNA library derived from a normal mouse cholangiocyte line was generated and assayed for average insert size and range of expressed protein size. Following restriction enzyme digestion of 35 individual clones, an average cDNA insert of 1.17 kb was determined with the insert size ranging from 0.3–3.5 kB. Eight representative samples are shown in Figure 1. Further analysis of the library was performed on bacterial cell lysates post-induction of protein expression by IPTG (Fig. 2). Fluorescent proteins were produced ranging in size from 10–100 kD. In order to determine if adequate coverage of the cholangiocyte transcriptome was present, a titer of the primary library was performed. It was determined that 4.5 × 106 independent clones were present ensuring greater than 100-fold coverage of genes expressed at 0.01% of the total transcript pool.

Figure 1
Molecular weight analysis of cDNA plasmid inserts. DNA from individual cDNA clones was subjected to restriction enzyme digestion using BsrGI. Samples were visualized on an agarose gel. The arrow indicates the pDONR222 plasmid at 2.5 kb. Other bands are ...
Figure 2
Molecular weight distribution of expressed proteins from cholangiocyte cDNA library. Bacterial cells containing cDNA clones were grown for 4 h in the present of IPTG. Resulting cell pellets were lysed and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide ...

Determination of cDNA library content

Before the cDNA library generated can be used in subsequent studies, it must first be verified that the proteins expressed by it are indeed cholangiocyte-derived. Three different methods were used for this aim. First, western blot analysis was performed using antibodies to proteins known to be expressed in bile ducts. Figure 3 demonstrates the presence of four such proteins: cytokeratin 19 (CK19),16 Annexin A1,17 hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a (HNF4a),18 and organic solute transporter α(Ostα).19 All of these proteins are expressed in the parental cell line for the library, NMC, and in the library post-transcriptional induction with IPTG. For CK19 and Ostα, expression is shown in the absence of induction, indicating that expression is leaky in some instances. A second method used to determine proteins present in the library is mass spectrometry of protein products from individual cDNA clones. Individual bacterial colonies were grown in the presence of IPTG, bacterial lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and fluorescent proteins were isolated and sequenced (Fig. 4). The last identification method used was direct DNA sequencing of individual cDNA-containing plasmids using a T7 promoter primer (data not shown). A summary of all proteins identified by the above methods is shown in Table 1. All but three of the revealed proteins have had confirmed expression in mouse cholangiocytes or total liver preparations. The three undetermined proteins have not been tested for expression in liver.

Figure 3
Western blot analysis of cholangiocyte-derived cDNA library. Protein expression from the cDNA library was induced by 4 h in culture with 1 mM IPTG. Antibodies to cytokeratin 19 (a), Annexin A1 (b), HNF4a (c), and Ostα(d) were tested. The arrows ...
Figure 4
Representative sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel of individual cDNA clones. Individual bacterial colonies were grown in the presence of 1 mM IPTG, lysed and separated by SDS-PAGE. Fluorescent proteins were visualized ...
Table 1
Known proteins identified in the cholangiocyte library

DISCUSSION

This investigation led to the generation of a cholangiocyte-specific expression cDNA library. SEREX analysis has become an important tool in identifying autoantigens targeted in both spontaneous and induced autoimmune disease in rodents and humans.13,34,35 One such potential disease for study using this newly created expression cDNA library is the mouse model of BA. As work performed in our laboratory has established the presence of antibodies to at least one known autoantigen in this model,7 the generation of a panel of potential novel autoantigens for SEREX screening would be advantageous. To this end, we successfully constructed a cDNA library expressing mouse cholangiocyte antigens in E. coli. The size of the library, as measured by number of independent clones, ensures that the spectrum of proteins contained within is fully reflective of the cholangiocyte cell line. Presence of both cholangiocyte-specific and non-specific proteins has been confirmed by a variety of methods and this library is available for screening with autoantibody-containing serum. In addition, autoreactive T-cell clones may be screened for potential reactivity with proteins present in the library with the goal of identifying T-cell autoantigens in murine BA. Identification of antigens relevant to murine BA is a stepping stone to deciphering autoimmune mechanisms of biliary tract injury in human BA.

It is important to note, that as this library is derived from normal mouse cholangiocytes, this library will be of use to the study of the autoimmune response in many murine biliary disease models, including PBC, PSC and autoimmune cholangitis.3638 This opportunity to identify and characterize disease-relevant protein targets in a number of cholangiopathies may lead to insight into global mechanistic questions related to autoimmune-mediated liver diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Dr Yoshiyuki Ueno of Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan for the kind gift of the NMC cell line. Financial support is from The National Institutes of Health, NIDDK 1 R01 DK078195.

REFERENCES

1. Dienes HP, Lohse AW, Gerken G, et al. Bile duct epithelia as target cells in primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Virchows Arch. 1997;431:119–124. [PubMed]
2. Fickert P, Fuchsbichler A, Wagner M, et al. Regurgitation of bile acids from leaky bile ducts causes sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2 (Abcb4) knockout mice. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:261–274. [PubMed]
3. Trauner M, Fickert P, Baghdasaryan A, et al. New insights into autoimmune cholangitis through animal models. Dig Dis. 2010;28:99–104. [PubMed]
4. Selmi C, Invernizzi P, Zuin M, Podda M, Seldin MF, Gershwin ME. Genes and (auto)immunity in primary biliary cirrhosis. Genes Immun. 2005;6:543–556. [PubMed]
5. Ikuno N, Scealy M, Davies JM, et al. A comparative study of antibody expressions in primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune cholangitis using phage display. Hepatology. 2001;34:478–486. [PubMed]
6. Mack CL, Tucker RM, Lu BR, et al. Cellular and humoral autoimmunity directed at bile duct epithelia in murine biliary atresia. Hepatology. 2006;44:1231–1239. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Lu BR, Brindley SM, Tucker RM, Lambert CL, Mack CL. Alpha-enolase autoantibodies cross-reactive to viral proteins in a mouse model of biliary atresia. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1753–1761. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Mack CL, Tucker RM, Sokol RJ, Kotzin BL. Armed CD4+ Th1 effector cells and activated macrophages participate in bile duct injury in murine biliary atresia. Clin Immunol. 2005;115:200–209. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Shivakumar P, Sabla G, Mohanty S, et al. Effector role of neonatal hepatic CD8+ lymphocytes in epithelial injury and autoimmunity in experimental biliary atresia. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:268–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Krebs P, Kurrer M, Sahin U, Tureci O, Ludewig B. Autoimmunity seen through the SEREX-scope. Autoimmun Rev. 2003;2:339–345. [PubMed]
11. Tan HT, Low J, Lim SG, Chung MC. Serum autoantibodies as biomarkers for early cancer detection. FEBS J. 2009;276:6880–6904. [PubMed]
12. Jager D. Potential target antigens for immunotherapy identified by serological expression cloning (SEREX) Methods Mol Biol. 2007;360:319–326. [PubMed]
13. Uchida K, Akita Y, Matsuo K, et al. Identification of specific autoantigens in Sjogren’s syndrome by SEREX. Immunology. 2005;116:53–63. [PubMed]
14. Wong FS, Karttunen J, Dumont C, et al. Identification of an MHC class I-restricted autoantigen in type 1 diabetes by screening an organ-specific cDNA library. Nat Med. 1999;5:1026–1031. [PubMed]
15. Alpini GPR, LaRusso NF. The pathobiology of biliary epithelia. In: Arias IMBJ, Chisari FV, Fausto N, Jakoby W, Schachter D, Shafritz DA, editors. The Liver; Biology &Pathobiology. 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. pp. 421–435.
16. Hreha G, Jefferson DM, Yu CH, et al. Immortalized intrahepatic mouse biliary epithelial cells: immunologic characterization and immunogenicity. Hepatology. 1999;30:358–371. [PubMed]
17. Damazo AS, Flower RJ, Solito E, Oliani SM. Annexin-A1 gene expression during liver development and post-translation modification after experimental endotoxemia. Inflamm Res. 2008;57:97–103. [PubMed]
18. Glaser S, Wang M, Ueno Y, et al. Differential transcriptional characteristics of small and large biliary epithelial cells derived from small and large bile ducts. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;299:G769–g777. [PubMed]
19. Ballatori N, Li N, Fang F, Boyer JL, Christian WV, Hammond CL. OST alpha-OST beta: a key membrane transporter of bile acids and conjugated steroids. Front Biosci. 2009;14:2829–2844. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kim H, Lee J, Hyun JW, Park JW, Joo HG, Shin T. Expression and immunohistochemical localization of galectin-3 in various mouse tissues. Cell Biol Int. 2007;31:655–662. [PubMed]
21. Magin TM, Schroder R, Leitgeb S, et al. Lessons from keratin 18 knockout mice: formation of novel keratin filaments, secondary loss of keratin 7 and accumulation of liver-specific keratin 8-positive aggregates. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:1441–1451. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:1488–1493. [PubMed]
23. Carninci P, Kasukawa T, Katayama S, et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science. 2005;309:1559–1563. [PubMed]
24. Kiang A, Hartman ZC, Everett RS, et al. Multiple innate inflammatory responses induced after systemic adenovirus vector delivery depend on a functional complement system. Mol Ther. 2006;14:588–598. [PubMed]
25. Shi Q, Dong Z, Wei H. The involvement of heat shock proteins in murine liver regeneration. Cell Mol Immunol. 2007;4:53–57. [PubMed]
26. Ren S, Zhang F, Li C, et al. Selection of housekeeping genes for use in quantitative reverse transcription PCR assays on the murine cornea. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1076–1086. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Cogswell C, Price SJ, Hou X, Guay-Woodford LM, Flaherty L, Bryda EC. Positional cloning of jcpk/bpk locus of the mouse. Mamm Genome. 2003;14:242–249. [PubMed]
28. Riehle KJ, Campbell JS, McMahan RS, et al. Regulation of liver regeneration and hepatocarcinogenesis by suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. J Exp Med. 2008;205:91–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Lin J, Wu PH, Tarr PT, et al. Defects in adaptive energy metabolism with CNS-linked hyperactivity in PGC-1alpha null mice. Cell. 2004;119:121–135. [PubMed]
30. Schumacher B, van der Pluijm I, Moorhouse MJ, et al. Delayed and accelerated aging share common longevity assurance mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000161. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Newbery HJ, Loh DH, O’Donoghue JE, et al. Translation elongation factor eEF1A2 is essential for post-weaning survival in mice. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:28951–28959. [PubMed]
32. Sheehan TE, Kumar PA, Hood DA. Tissue-specific regulation of cytochrome c oxidase subunit expression by thyroid hormone. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;286:E968–E974. [PubMed]
33. Rogler LE. Selective bipotential differentiation of mouse embryonic hepatoblasts in vitro. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:591–602. [PubMed]
34. Waterman EA, Gawkrodger DJ, Watson PF, Weetman AP, Kemp EH. Autoantigens in vitiligo identified by the serological selection of a phage-displayed melanocyte cDNA expression library. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:230–240. [PubMed]
35. Takizawa S, Endo T, Wanjia X, Tanaka S, Takahashi M, Kobayashi T. HSP 10 is a new autoantigen in both autoimmune pancreatitis and fulminant type 1 diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;386:192–196. [PubMed]
36. Christen U, Holdener M, Hintermann E. Animal models for autoimmune hepatitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2007;6:306–311. [PubMed]
37. Haruta I, Kikuchi K, Hashimoto E, et al. Long-term bacterial exposure can trigger nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis associated with multifocal epithelial inflammation. Lab Invest. 2010;90:577–588. [PubMed]
38. Zhang W, Tsuda M, Yang GX, et al. Deletion of interleukin-6 in mice with the dominant negative form of transforming growth factor beta receptor II improves colitis but exacerbates autoimmune cholangitis. Hepatology. 2010;52:215–222. [PMC free article] [PubMed]