PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jcinvestThe Journal of Clinical InvestigationCurrent IssueArchiveSubscriptionAbout the Journal
 
J Clin Invest. Jun 15, 2000; 105(12): 1827–1832.
PMCID: PMC378516
Two defects contribute to hypothalamic leptin resistance in mice with diet-induced obesity
Karim El-Haschimi, Dominique D. Pierroz, Stanley M. Hileman, Christian Bjørbæk, and Jeffrey S. Flier
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey S. Flier, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 99 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. Phone: (617) 667-2151; Fax: (617) 667-2927; E-mail: jflier/at/caregroup.harvard.edu.
Received March 13, 2000; Accepted May 9, 2000.
Obesity in humans and in rodents is usually associated with high circulating leptin levels and leptin resistance. To examine the molecular basis for leptin resistance, we determined the ability of leptin to induce hypothalamic STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription) signaling in C57BL/6J mice fed either low-fat or high-fat diets. In mice fed the low-fat diet, leptin activated STAT3 signaling when administered via the intraperitoneal (ip) or the intracerebroventricular (icv) route, with the half-maximal dose being 30-fold less when given by the icv route. The high-fat diet increased body-weight gain and plasma leptin levels. After 4 weeks on the diet, hypothalamic STAT3 signaling after ip leptin administration was equivalent in both diet groups. In contrast, peripherally administered leptin was completely unable to activate hypothalamic STAT3 signaling, as measured by gel shift assay after 15 weeks of high-fat diet. Despite the absence of detectable signaling after peripheral leptin at 15 weeks, the mice fed the high-fat diet retained the capacity to respond to icv leptin, although the magnitude of STAT3 activation was substantially reduced. These results suggest that leptin resistance induced by a high-fat diet evolves during the course of the diet and has at least two independent causes: an apparent defect in access to sites of action in the hypothalamus that markedly limits the ability of peripheral leptin to activate hypothalamic STAT signaling, and an intracellular signaling defect in leptin-responsive hypothalamic neurons that lies upstream of STAT3 activation.
Leptin, the protein product of the ob gene, is predominantly secreted from white adipose tissue, and acts on the brain to regulate food intake, energy expenditure, and neuroendocrine function (14). In genetically obese (ob/ob) mice that lack functional leptin, recombinant leptin is highly effective at reversing obesity (2, 3, 5). However, most cases of obesity in rodents (6) and humans (7) are associated with high circulating leptin levels; the resistance to leptin that characterizes these states has not yet been explained. Potential sites for leptin resistance include the blood-brain-barrier transport system (8, 9) and the leptin signaling mechanism in leptin-responsive neurons in the hypothalamus (10). Rodents with obesity induced by high-fat diet (diet-induced obesity, or DIO) become hyperleptinemic, and food intake and body weight are resistant to the effects of exogenous leptin administered peripherally, such as by an intraperitoneal (ip) route (11, 12). Such rodents do respond to leptin given by the intracerebrovascular (icv) route, consistent with a defect in the blood-brain barrier (11, 12). Upon peripheral administration of leptin to normal mice, leptin rapidly induces hypothalamic signaling through the STAT3 pathway, as evidenced by induction of a gel mobility shift using a STAT3 DNA element and hypothalamic nuclear extracts (10). The status of leptin signaling has not heretofore been assessed in mice during the course of development of DIO. We therefore examined hypothalamic STAT3 signaling induced by ip or icv leptin in mice fed diets containing 10% or 45% fat for either 4 or 15 weeks.
Animals and diets.
Male C57BL/6J mice (3 weeks old) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). The animals and procedures used were in accordance with the guidelines and approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Upon arrival, mice were fed a standard rodent chow for 1 week to acclimate, and were housed in groups of nine. Room temperature was maintained between 21–23°C, and a 12-hour light, 12-hour dark cycle was used. When mice were 4 weeks of age, they were divided into two groups. One group was given a high-fat diet containing 45% fat (D12451; Research Diets Inc., New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA), and the other group was given a low-fat diet (D12450; Research Diets Inc.) containing 10% fat. Body weight and food intake were measured weekly at the same time of day. Groups of mice were removed from these cohorts at specific timepoints. After central and peripheral injections, mice were deeply anesthetized by inhalation of Metofane (Mallinckrodt Veterinary Inc., Mundelein, Illinois, USA) and then decapitated. Hypothalami were quickly dissected and either used for electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) or frozen and used for RT-PCR.
Hormone and hormone assays.
Recombinant mouse leptin (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) was dissolved in sterile PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.1% BSA before ip or icv injections. Plasma leptin levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (Linco Research Inc., St. Charles, Missouri, USA).
Leptin icv injection.
After mice were anesthetized with Metofane, the skull was exposed and the bregma was located. The right lateral ventricle (coordinates: 0.5 mm caudal and 1 mm lateral from bregma, depth 2.5 mm) was injected with 0.5 μg of leptin or buffer in a volume of 3 μL with an Exmire Microsyringe (Ito Corp., Fuji, Japan).
Microvessel isolation.
Microvessel isolation was performed as described earlier (13). Briefly, microvessels were isolated from each brain after removal of the cerebellum and brain stem. The forebrains were dissected, stripped of the pia-arachnoid, and homogenized in a solution containing 118 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, 5.5 mM D-glucose, 0.2% (wt/vol) fraction V albumin, and 28 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). The homogenates were filtered through nylon meshes (147 μm, 74 μm, and 37 μm). The microvessels were gently removed from the 74-μm and 37-μm meshes, washed with PBS three times, and centrifuged at 200 g for 20 minutes.
Quantitative RT-PCR.
The following primers were used for specific PCR amplification. SOCS-3 (suppressor of cytokine signaling): 5′-ACCAGCGCCACTTCTTCACG-3′ and 5′-GTGGAGCATCATACTGATCC-3′; PIAS-3 (a protein inhibitor of activated STAT): 5′-AGGAGAAACTGACTGCTGACC-3′ and 5′-AATCAGCGACTCATAGGGAGCC-3′; STAT3: 5′-TCCTCTATCAGCACAACCTTCG-3′ and 5′-AGCTGCTGCATCTTCTGTCTGG-3′; ObRa (short isoform of the leptin receptor): 5′-ACACTGTTAATTTCACACCAGAG-3′ and 5′-AGTCATTCAAACCATTAGTTTAGG-3′; ObRall forms (designed to detect all known forms of ObR): 5′-ACAGCGTGCTTCCTGGGTCTTC-3′ and 5′-CACAGTGCTTCCCACTAGTGATTGG-3′; ObRb (long form of the leptin receptor): 5′-GGGTAATACTTAAACAGTGACC-3′ and 5′-CTATCTGAAAATAAAAACTTCATG-3′; β-actin: 5′-CGTACCACGGGCATTGTGATGG-3′ and 5′-TTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTCCC-3′. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed as described earlier (14) with the following modifications. After initial denaturation at 96°C for 3 minutes, the samples were subjected to cycles of amplification: denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 55°C for 1 minute, and elongation at 72°C for 45 seconds. Preliminary PCR experiments showed that the rate of amplification was linear for a limited number of cycles, so the samples were subjected to 17 cycles of amplification for β-actin, 23 cycles for PIAS-3 and STAT3, 25 cycles for SOCS-3 and ObRb, and 29 cycles for ObRa and ObRall. Ten microliters of the reaction mixture were combined with 5 μL of sequencing stop solution and heated at 85°C for 3 minutes; 4 μL was loaded on to 4% urea-acrylamide gels. Results for ObRa and ObRall forms were normalized to β-actin.
Nuclear extraction and EMSA.
Nuclear extractions were done as described earlier (15). Briefly, animals were deprived of food overnight. Thirty minutes after icv or ip administration of leptin or buffer, the animals were anesthetized and then decapitated. The hypothalami were dissected and homogenized in 100:1 (vol/vol) buffer A (10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES at pH 7.9, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1× complete TM protease inhibitor from Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA). The samples were centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in a 4:1 ratio of buffer A and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in 2 volumes of buffer B (420 mM NaCl, 10 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1× complete TM protease inhibitor), and were extracted by vigorous rocking at 4°C for 30 minutes. The nuclear extracts were finally clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was diluted tenfold in buffer C (10 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 1× complete TM protease inhibitor) and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was concentrated on Microcon-50 ultrafiltration columns (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Massachusetts, USA), and the filtrate was stored at –80°C until use in the EMSA.
EMSA was performed as previously described (10, 16). The entire nuclear extract from each hypothalamus was added to binding buffer E (40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.9, 4% Ficoll (Pharmacia, Peapack, New Jersey, USA), 0.5 mM DTT, and 100 μg EGTA) containing 3 μg dI-dC (Pharmacia) that included 100,000 cpm of the 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probe. The final volume was 60 μL. The mixture was incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature, and was resolved by 5% native PAGE in 0.5× TBE at 4°C. The probe was generated by first annealing two oligonucleotides: 5′-CGCTCCATTTCCCGTAAATCAT-3′ and 5′-CGCTCATGATTTACGGGAAATG-3′ (STAT-inducible element mutant 67) (17). This step was followed by a fill-in reaction of the five base overhangs using T7 polymerase (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) and [32P]α-deoxynucleotide triphosphates (each 222 TBq/mmol, 740 MBq/mL; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed using a G25 Quick Spin column (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals Inc.). After drying, gels were placed in a PhosphorImager cassette (Molecular Dynamics Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA) for 12–16 hours.
Statistical analysis.
Individual variations were analyzed by Fisher analysis or Student’s t test.
The aim of this study was to examine the basis for the leptin resistance that develops when C57BL/6J mice are placed on a high-fat diet. Mice were studied after 4 weeks and 15 weeks of low-fat or high-fat diet. Leptin was administered by either the ip or icv route, after which leptin signaling to activate STAT3 in the hypothalamus was assessed. To better understand the characteristics of leptin signaling to STAT3 in the hypothalamus, we first performed a dose-response study for STAT3 activation by gel shift assay after ip vs. icv leptin in mice fed a normal chow diet (Figure (Figure1a).1a). STAT3 activation was dose dependent with both routes of administration. The dose-response curve for icv leptin was shifted 30-fold to the left. The half-maximal dose of leptin was 0.5 μg after icv administration, and approximately 15 μg after ip administration. A dose of 30 μg icv leptin was no more effective than 5 μg icv (data not shown). The maximal response was obtained 15–30 minutes after 0.5 μg icv leptin (Figure (Figure1b).1b). This is similar to the maximal-response timepoint observed after intravascular injection that was reported by Vaisse et al. (10).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Gel shift assays of dose response for STAT3 activation after ip (open circles) and icv (filled circles) leptin administration, and time course of STAT3 activation after icv leptin administration in 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice on a standard chow diet. Each (more ...)
Mice fed the high-fat diet had a measurable, significant weight increase after 4 days; after 15 weeks they weighed 24% more than those fed the low-fat diet (Figure (Figure2a).2a). Mice fed the high-fat diet also ingested more calories per day (Figure (Figure2b).2b). As expected, high-fat feeding and attendant obesity were associated with increased leptin levels (Figure (Figure2c).2c). The ability of leptin to induce STAT3 signaling was first studied after 4 weeks on the diets. After an overnight fast, mice were administered 100 μg recombinant mouse leptin by the ip route. Thirty minutes later, hypothalami were isolated, nuclear extracts were obtained, and STAT3 activation was assessed by EMSA. After 4 weeks on the diets, peripheral leptin treatment induced STAT3 DNA binding activity to an equivalent extent in hypothalami of mice fed low- and high-fat diets (Figure (Figure3,3, a and b). In contrast, after 15 weeks on the diets, the same dose of ip leptin that was effective in mice fed the low-fat diet was unable to induce detectable STAT3 DNA binding activity in hypothalami of mice fed the high-fat diet (Figure (Figure3,3, c and d). We obtained the same result in another independent experiment with six mice in each group (data not shown). Thus, prolonged high-fat feeding induced profound resistance to peripherally administered leptin as measured by STAT3 signaling in the hypothalamus. It is worth noting that even after 4 weeks on a high-fat diet, mice appear to be in positive energy balance, as suggested by early weight gain (Figure (Figure2),2), and they may therefore already have some degree of leptin resistance. We did not directly assess leptin resistance by evaluating the effects of leptin administration on food intake and body weight at 4 weeks in the current study. If leptin resistance exists at this point, our data suggest that the mechanism is different, or it is of much smaller magnitude than that seen after 15 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Physiological characteristics of male C57BL/6J mice fed high-fat (n = 22) and low-fat (n = 22) diets. Dietary treatment began when mice were 4 weeks old and lasted for 15 weeks. Filled circles represent a diet of 45% fat; open (more ...)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Leptin-induced STAT3 DNA-binding activity in hypothalami of mice on diets of 45% fat (HFD) and 10% fat (LFD). Mice were starved overnight and then received an ip or icv leptin injection. They were sacrificed 30 minutes later, and nuclear (more ...)
If the absence of leptin signaling after 15 weeks of high-fat diet was due to a defect in access of peripheral leptin to sites of action in the hypothalamus, then icv leptin administration should be able to overcome this defect. Consistent with this hypothesis, icv leptin given at a much lower dose than was given intraperitoneally (0.5 μg vs. 100 μg) clearly induced STAT3 activation in mice with 15 weeks of DIO (Figure (Figure3e).3e). Thus, one component of the leptin resistance in mice with 15 weeks of DIO can be attributed to a failure to deliver leptin to its sites of action in the hypothalamus, presumably by a defect in the blood-brain-barrier transport system. Importantly, however, whereas icv leptin can induce signaling in mice with DIO, the extent of this induction is 75% lower than that in mice fed the low-fat diet (Figure (Figure3f).3f). This finding was confirmed in an independent experiment with five mice in each group (data not shown). The results demonstrate that in addition to an apparent defect in leptin access to the hypothalamus, a signaling defect also exists upstream of STAT3 activation in leptin-responsive hypothalamic neurons in these DIO mice. To verify that the STAT3 DNA binding activity in the hypothalamus after leptin administration was dependent on the long form of the leptin receptor, we examined STAT3 DNA binding activity after administration of 100 μg ip leptin to db/db mice, which lack the long form of leptin receptor (18, 19). As expected, we found no leptin-induced STAT3 DNA binding activity in hypothalami of db/db mice, whereas controls showed a strong signal (data not shown).
These results suggest that at least two defects underlie the leptin resistance that develops during the course of high-fat feeding in C57BL/6J mice. A defect at the level of leptin access is inferred from the fact that icv administration of leptin at least partially overcomes the diminished signaling observed after peripheral administration in these mice. These findings are consistent with the data of Van Heek et al. (11), who found that icv, but not ip leptin could diminish food intake and reduce body weight in a similar obesity model. Our data extends those physiologic findings to the level of signal transduction by demonstrating that leptin-induced STAT3 activation is undetectable after ip leptin, but is present after icv leptin administration, after 15 weeks of high-fat diet. The molecular mechanism for the apparent defect in leptin access or transport remains unknown at present. Leptin transport into the brain may involve the ObRa isoform (short form) of the leptin receptor, which is highly expressed within the blood-brain barrier (13). In one study, expression of ObRa mRNA in cerebral microvessels of rats with DIO was increased (20). We therefore examined the expression of ObRa mRNA in cerebral microvessels of mice with 15–18 weeks of DIO, and observed that no change in the expression of ObRa mRNA was evident (Figure (Figure4b).4b). In addition, we found no significant difference in expression of leptin receptor mRNA using primers designed to detect all known forms of ObR (ObRall, Figure Figure4b).4b). Thus, the mechanism underlying what appears to be reduced leptin transport across the blood-brain barrier does not involve reduced expression of the mRNA encoding a putative leptin transporter within the blood-brain barrier. Further studies will be required to determine whether the protein expression or function of putative leptin transporters at the blood-brain barrier are impaired in DIO.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Hypothalamic mRNA expression of SOCS-3, PIAS-3, STAT3, and ObRb (long isoform of leptin receptor) after 18 weeks on a high-fat (white bars; n = 8) or low-fat (black bars; n = 5) diet. (b) Expression in brain microvessels of short-form (more ...)
In addition to the defect in transport or availability of leptin, our data provide the first evidence that a second defect exists at the level of leptin signaling to activate STAT3 in DIO. Leptin activation of STAT3 requires the ObRb isoform (long form) of the leptin receptor, which associates with and activates Janus tyrosine kinase-2 (JAK2) in a ligand-dependent manner (2124). One potential mediator of reduced STAT3 activation in the hypothalamus of DIO mice is SOCS-3, a suppressor of cytokine signaling, whose expression we have shown previously to be acutely induced by leptin in neurons expressing ObRb in the hypothalami of normal rodents (14, 25). Forced expression of SOCS-3 in mammalian cells antagonizes proximal leptin signaling, probably by binding to and antagonizing JAK activity (26). PIAS-3 (protein inhibitor of activated STAT) is a recently described antagonist of STAT3 DNA binding activity (27), whose mRNA expression has not previously been examined in the hypothalamus of normal mice. Using quantitative RT-PCR, we examined the expression of SOCS-3 and PIAS-3 mRNA in hypothalami of mice fed low-fat or high-fat diets for 18 weeks. No significant differences were found (Figure (Figure4a).4a). In addition, we found no significant difference in hypothalamic STAT3 or ObRb mRNA expression between the two groups (Figure (Figure4a).4a). Thus, a molecular basis for the observed defect in leptin’s ability to activate STAT3 signaling remains to be determined.
Although C57BL/6J mice fed high-fat diets for 15 weeks fail to activate detectable hypothalamic STAT3 signaling in response to peripheral leptin, it is worth noting that these DIO mice are less obese than db/db mice that lack all receptor-dependent STAT signaling. Additionally, unlike db/db mice, DIO mice are fertile. Thus, despite our demonstration of severely impaired hypothalamic STAT3 activation after ip leptin, some important leptin signals are clearly reaching target neurons within the central nervous system in these mice. How does this conclusion relate to our inability to detect STAT3 activation either basally or after ip leptin administration in mice with 15 weeks of DIO? The leptin receptor ObRb isoform activates the JAK/STAT pathway, but is capable of activating the MAP kinase (23) or PI-3 kinase pathway (28) in certain mammalian cell lines as well. It is therefore possible that STAT3 pathways are selectively inhibited in key neural groups, but important signals via MAP kinase or PI-3 kinase pathways are effectively transmitted. Alternatively, there may be key receptor signals transmitted through sites other than the hypothalamus that we did not sample. Finally, our assay may not be sensitive enough to pick up STAT3 activation in a limited, but functionally important subpopulation of leptin-responsive hypothalamic neurons. Understanding the mechanism by which substantial resistance to leptin’s action on appetite and body weight coexists with persistent effects on neuroendocrine function should be an important goal of future research.
Leptin resistance is the hallmark of obesity induced by a high-fat diet in rodents, and occurs naturally in obese humans. If the factors limiting leptin action on appetite and body weight in human obesity are similar to those seen here in mice with DIO, then pharmaceutical development aimed at creating small-molecule leptin mimics with increased capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier might be effective in treating human obesity. On the other hand, a potential limitation of such an approach would be the factors that limit leptin signaling. It will be important in future studies to determine the precise molecular basis for this signaling defect.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (to J.S. Flier), Eli Lilly and Co. (to J.S. Flier), the Swiss National Scientific Research Foundation (to D.D. Pierroz), The Joslin Diabetes Center, DERC Pilot and Feasibility Study (to C. Bjørbæk), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to K. El-Haschimi).
Footnotes
Karim El-Haschimi and Dominique D. Pierroz contributed equally to this work.
1. Zhang Y, et al. Positional cloning of the mouse obese gene and its human homologue. Nature. 1994;372:425–432. [PubMed]
2. Pelleymounter MA, et al. Effects of the obese gene product on body weight regulation in ob/ob mice. Science. 1995;269:540–543. [PubMed]
3. Halaas JL, et al. Weight reducing effects of the plasma protein encoded by the obese gene. Science. 1995;269:543–546. [PubMed]
4. Ahima RS, et al. Role of leptin in the neuroendocrine response to fasting. Nature. 1996;382:250–252. [PubMed]
5. Campfield LA, Smith FJ, Guisez Y, Devos R, Burn P. Recombinant mouse OB protein: evidence for a peripheral signal linking adiposity and central neural networks. Science. 1995;269:546–549. [PubMed]
6. Frederich RC, et al. Leptin levels reflect body lipid content in mice: evidence for diet-induced resistance to leptin action. Nat Med. 1995;1:1311–1314. [PubMed]
7. Considine RV, et al. Serum immunoreactive-leptin concentrations in normal-weight and obese humans. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:324–325. [PubMed]
8. Caro JF, et al. Decreased cerebrospinal-fluid/serum leptin ratio in obesity: a possible mechanism for leptin resistance. Lancet. 1996;348:159–161. [PubMed]
9. Schwartz MW, Peskind E, Raskind M, Boyko EJ, Porte D., Jr Cerebrospinal fluid leptin levels: relationship to plasma levels and to adiposity in humans. Nat Med. 1996;2:589–593. [PubMed]
10. Vaisse C, et al. Leptin activation of Stat3 in the hypothalamus of wild-type and ob/ob mice but not db/db mice. Nat Genet. 1996;14:95–97. [PubMed]
11. Van Heek MV, et al. Diet-induced obese mice develop peripheral, but not central, resistance to leptin. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:385–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Widdowson PS, Upton R, Buckingham R, Williams G. Inhibition of food response to intracerebroventricular injection of leptin is attenuated in rats with diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 1997;46:1782–1785. [PubMed]
13. Bjørbæk C, et al. Expression of leptin receptor isoforms in rat brain microvessels. Endocrinology. 1998;139:3485–3491. [PubMed]
14. Bjørbæk C, Elmquist JK, Frantz JD, Shoelson SE, Flier JS. Identification of SOCS-3 as a potential mediator of central leptin resistance. Mol Cell. 1998;1:619–625. [PubMed]
15. Schreiber E, Matthias P, Muller MM, Schaffner W. Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with ‘mini-extracts’, prepared from a small number of cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:6419. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Levy DE, Kessler DS, Pine RI, Darnell JE., Jr Cytoplasmic activation of ISGF3, the positive regulator of interferon-alpha stimulated transcription, reconstituted in vitro. Genes Dev. 1989;3:1362–1371. [PubMed]
17. Wagner BJ, Hayes TE, Hoban CJ, Cochran BH. The SIF binding element confers sis/PDGF inducibility onto the c-fos promoter. EMBO J. 1990;9:4477–4484. [PubMed]
18. Lee G, et al. Abnormal splicing of the leptin receptor in diabetic mice. Nature. 1996;379:632–635. [PubMed]
19. Chen H, et al. Evidence that the diabetes gene is the leptin receptor-identification of a mutation in the leptin receptor gene in db/db mice. Cell. 1996;84:491–495. [PubMed]
20. Boado RJ, Golden PL, Levin N, Padridge WM. Up-regulation of blood-brain barrier short-form leptin receptor gene products in rats fed a high fat diet. J Neurochem. 1998;71:1761–1764. [PubMed]
21. Ghilardi N, et al. Defective STAT signaling by the leptin receptor in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6231–6235. [PubMed]
22. Baumann H, et al. The full-length leptin receptor has signaling capacities of interleukin 6-type cytokine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8374–8378. [PubMed]
23. Bjørbæk C, Uotani S, da Silva B, Flier JS. Divergent signaling capacities of the long and short isoform of the leptin receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:32686–32695. [PubMed]
24. Ghilardi N, Skoda RC. The leptin receptor activates janus kinase 2 and signals for proliferation in a factor-dependent cell line. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:393–399. [PubMed]
25. Elias CF, et al. Leptin differentially regulates NPY and POMC neurons projecting to the lateral hypothalamic area. Neuron. 1999;23:775–786. [PubMed]
26. Bjørbæk C, El-Haschimi K, Frantz JD, Flier JS. The role of SOCS-3 in leptin signaling and leptin resistance. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:30059–30065. [PubMed]
27. Chung CD, et al. Specific inhibition of STAT3 signal transduction by PIAS3. Science. 1998;278:1803–1805. [PubMed]
28. Harvey J, et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in leptin-induced K (ATP) channel activation in the rat CRI-G1 insulinoma cell line. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4660–4669. [PubMed]
Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Clinical Investigation