PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Neurosci. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 October 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3773220
NIHMSID: NIHMS471957

Content matters: neuroimaging investigation of brain and behavioral impact of televised anti-tobacco public service announcements

Abstract

Public service announcements (PSAs) are televised ads that are a key component of public health campaigns against smoking. Understanding the neurophysiological correlates of anti-tobacco ads is an important step towards novel objective methods of their evaluation and design. In the present study, we used Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to investigate the brain and behavioral effects of the interaction between content (“argument strength”) and format (“message sensation value”) of anti-smoking ads in human. Seventy-one non-treatment seeking smokers viewed a sequence of sixteen high or 16 low argument strength ads during a fMRI scan. Dependent variables were brain fMRI signal, the immediate recall of the ads, immediate change in Intentions to Quit Smoking and the urine levels of a major nicotine metabolite cotinine at a one-month follow-up. Whole brain ANOVA revealed that argument strength and message sensation value interacted in the inferior frontal, inferior parietal and fusiform gyri, the precuneus and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC). Regression analysis showed that the activation in the dMPFC predicted lower cotinine levels a month later. These results characterize the key brain regions engaged in the processing of persuasive communications and suggest that brain fMRI response to anti-smoking ads could predict subsequent smoking severity in non-treatment seeking smokers. Our findings demonstrate the importance of the quality of ad content for objective ad outcomes and suggest that fMRI investigation may aid the pre-release evaluation of televised public health announcements.

Introduction

Smoking is the most common preventable cause of death worldwide (WHO, 2012). Public service announcements (PSAs) are televised ads that are the key component of anti-smoking public health campaigns. Such campaigns have had variable outcomes suggesting the need to improve methods of ad evaluation (Cummings, 1999; Sly et al., 2001; Hersey et al., 2005; Wakefield et al., 2005; Durkin et al., 2012; Emery et al., 2012). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been highly informative in the study of the brain mechanisms underlying the processing of audiovisual stimuli, such as encoding of information (Gabrieli et al., 1998), feature films (Rao et al., 2007; Hasson et al., 2010; Whittingstall et al., 2010) and televised commercials (Morris et al., 2008). Recently, fMRI has been applied to the study of persuasive health messages and video ads (Langleben et al., 2009; Falk et al., 2010; Chua et al., 2011; Falk et al., 2011). In communication theories, content and format of ads are considered critical to change intentions and consequently behavior (Fishbein and Cappella, 2006). Content has been operationalized as argument strength (AS) and format as message sensation value (MSV) (Petty and Cacioppo, 1986; Kang et al., 2006; Park et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2011). AS is a measure of an audience’s perception of the quality and persuasiveness of ad arguments (Strasser et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2011) and MSV is a standard aggregate measure of audio and visual features of ads, such as cuts, special effects, intense images and music (Morgan, 2003).

Our previous study (Langleben et al., 2009) focused on format and found that ads low in MSV were better recalled, and associated with greater brain activation in the superior, middle and orbital frontal and middle temporal gyri, and less activation in the occipito-parietal cortex, than high MSV ads. Since that study did not manipulate the argument strength of ads and contained no long-term behavior outcome, it could not determine the effect of content on the brain or long-term behavioral correlates of ad processing. Health communication research shows that ads content is no less important to outcomes than the format (Fishbein et al., 2002a; Lee et al., 2011). Indeed, communication theories (Petty and Cacioppo, 1986; Donohew et al., 1998) concur that it is the interaction between content and format that ultimately affects outcomes, but differ on whether high message sensation value facilitates or impedes the processing of ad content (Strasser et al., 2009). Non-imaging experimental studies report content by format interactions on attention to televised ads (Geiger and Reeves, 1993), as well as smokers’ attitudes and intentions towards quitting (Strasser et al., 2009). The present study investigated the brain and behavioral effects of content and format interactions in non-treatment seeking smokers. We hypothesized that the brain regions mediating with cognitive processing will be activated by the content and format interaction and that this activation will predict cognitive and behavioral measures of smoking, indexed by intention to quit and delayed urinary levels of the nicotine metabolite cotinine.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Seventy-one (37 female, 38 Caucasian, 27 African American, 4 Asian and 2 Hispanic, 4 left-handed) non-treatment seeking participants who reported smoking an average of 14.4 ±7 cigarettes per day, aged from 18 to 49 yr (30.21 ±9.69 yr, mean ±SD), with an average of 14 ±2 years of education, were recruited by advertising. Participants gave written informed consent to participate in the protocol approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Screening exclusion criteria were 1) presence of DSM-4-TR Axis 1 psychiatric disorder (First, 2002), 2) urine drug screen (UDS) positive for illicit opioids, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine or methamphetamine, 3) baseline urinary cotinine levels less than 50 ng/ml (SRNT, 2002), 4) presence of medical or neurological disorder or treatment that may affect the cerebrovascular system, and 5) safety-related contraindications for MRI scanning. Once enrolled to the study, participants were randomly assigned to either a high AS or low AS group.

Materials and design

One hundred ninety-nine 30 s long filmed anti-smoking PSAs targeting adult smokers were obtained from the Annenberg School of Communications collection (Strasser et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2011). The argument quality and format of the PSAs were evaluated using perceived Argument Strength (AS) and Message Sensation Value (MSV) measures respectively (Fishbein et al., 2002b; Morgan, 2003; Strasser et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2011). The study followed a 2×2 design, with AS as a between-subjects variable and MSV as a within-subject variable, to enable collecting the behavioral correlates (recall, intention to quit smoking and cotinine levels) as functions of High and Low AS separately.

The AS score for each PSA was generated following a previously reported procedure (Strasser et al., 2009). Briefly, explicit and implicit messages in each ad were transcribed independently by two trained raters. These transcripts were then reviewed by two different raters who chose a single statement (central argument) that best reflected the arguments in each ad (Strasser et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2011). These central arguments were then rated in a survey of 387 current smokers, who were asked to rate between 8 and 12 PSAs using a questionnaire with 11 questions (5-point scale, 1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree). A balanced design was used so that each ad was rated by an average of 38 smokers. The AS scores for each ad were created by summing each rater’s responses to the 11 questions, then an overall AS score for each ad was created by taking the mean of the individual ratings for that ad (Strasser et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2011).

MSV is a validated aggregate measure of audio and visual format features of PSAs.MSVvariables are visual (cuts, edits, special effects, motion change, vivid coloring), audio (sound saturation, sound level, music and voices), and narrative (cuts, edits, and surprise endings). (Morgan, 2003; Langleben et al., 2009; Strasser et al., 2009). Three trained raters independently viewed and rated each ad forMSVparameters. Inter-rater reliability of MSV scoring between pairs of raters was high (Kendall’s tau 0.906, p 0.001).

Finally, from the available 199 ads rated for MSV and AS, we selected 32 ads exceeding one standard deviation from the mean on each of the two dimensions (AS and MSV), thus yielding four ad categories: High AS/High MSV, High AS/Low MSV, Low AS/High MSV and Low AS/Low MSV. Each category comprised 8 videos. Participants were randomly assigned to either the high AS group, which viewed 16 high AS PSAs (8 High AS/High MSV and 8 High AS/Low MSV), or the low AS group, which viewed the 16 low AS PSAs (8 Low AS/High MSV and 8 Low AS/Low MSV). The topics of the central arguments of the 32 PSAs were: “Smoking causes disease and/or death (15); “Smoking is aversive to others” (9); “Smoking will harm your baby or child” (6); “Smoking harms others” (1); “Not smoking has health or other benefits” (5); “There are ways to help you quit” (2). Six ads had two topics. The number of ads that contained smoking cues was balanced between the groups: Six out of 16 PSAs in the high AS group and 6 out of 16 PSAs in the low AS group contained images of smoking.

PSA video task

Sixteen PSAs were presented in a random order and separated by 16-second inter-stimuli intervals (ISI, grey cross-hair fixation point on a homogenous black background). An additional 16-second baseline period with the same fixation point was presented at the beginning of the task. Each PSA was 30 seconds long and was presented only once. The task duration was 12 min and 36 sec.

Frame recognition task (FRT)

This task tested the memorability of the PSAs (Rossiter and Silberstein, 2001; Langleben et al., 2009) by measuring the correct recognition of frames extracted from PSAs viewed in the video task. Participants were asked to respond with a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to the question ‘Have you seen this ad?’ displayed on top of each frame, using a single axis scroll wheel (FORPTM, Current Design Inc., Philadelphia, PA). FRT contained a total of 96 still frames, 48 were targets that were extracted from 16 PSAs used in the PSA video task (three frames from each PSA, one from each 10 sec segment of each 30-sec PSA), and 48 were foils that were drawn from comparable anti-tobacco PSAs not shown in this study. All frames were presented in a pseudo-random order (Dale, 1999) with variable ISIs (i.e. black background with grey cross hair as fixation point) ranging from 1.5 to 9.5 sec. Each frame was displayed once, for 2.5 sec. The task duration was 10 min and 6 sec.

Both tasks were programmed in the Presentation (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc., Albany, CA) stimulus presentation package. Stimuli were delivered through a rear projector system (Epson American, Inc., Long Beach, CA) that was viewed through a mirror mounted on the MRI scanner head coil. The video soundtrack was delivered through Silent Scan 2100 MRI-compatible headphones (Avotec Inc., Stuart, FL).

Procedure

Baseline assessments: Participants were screened for eligibility for fMRI, demographics and handedness (Oldfield, 1971). One hour prior to the fMRI session, participants provided urine samples for baseline cotinine levels and urine drug screen (UDS, Reditest, Redwood Toxicology Labs, Santa Rosa, CA), and completed the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), the average number of cigarettes per day (Sobell and Sobell, 1992), and baseline Intention to Quit Smoking (IQS) assessment (Gibbons et al., 1998; Fishbein et al., 2001). Cotinine levels were measured using the high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with a limit of detection of 2 ng/ml. FTND is a six-item, self report measure with a range of 0-10, where higher scores reflect greater nicotine dependence (Heatherton et al., 1991). The FTND has good internal consistency and high test-retest reliability (Pomerleau et al., 1994). IQS is a 2-item self-report measure of likelihood and certainty of one’s quitting smoking in the next 12 months, ranging from 1 (not likely) to 4 (very likely).

The study was comprised of a MRI session and a follow-up session one month later. Participants were randomly assigned to either the high AS group who watched High AS/High MSV and High AS/Low MSV PSAs, or the low AS group who watched Low AS/High MSV and Low AS/Low MSV PSAs. After completion of the baseline assessments and 30 to 45 minutes prior to the onset of the fMRI session, participants were escorted outdoors to smoke one of their own cigarettes under observation. All participants took the opportunity to smoke and consumed no more than one cigarette. Before the FRT task started, participants were instructed to attend to the video ads, and were told to that the video task will be followed by a memory test of how well they remembered the ads. IQS was repeated immediately after the MRI session. At the follow-up session approximately one month later (33 ±12 days, mean ±SD), a repeat urine sample for cotinine level was collected, and self-reported average number of cigarettes per day was recorded.

Image acquisition

Siemens Tim Trio 3T (Erlangen, Germany) system and 32-channel head coil were used for the MRI imaging. BOLD fMRI (Bandettini et al., 1992; Kwong et al., 1992) was performed, using a whole-brain, single-shot gradient-echo (GE) echoplanar (EPI) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE=2000/30 ms, FOV=220 mm, matrix=64×64, slice thickness/gap=3.4/0 mm, 32 slices, effective voxel resolution of 3.4×3.4×3.4 mm. After BOLD fMRI, 5-min magnetization-prepared, rapid acquisition gradient echo T1-weighted image (MPRAGE, TR/TE=1630/3.87 ms, FOV=250 mm, matrix=256×192, effective voxel resolution of 1×1×1 mm) was acquired for anatomic overlays of functional data and spatial normalization (Lancaster et al., 2000). An oblique acquisition, oriented along the AC-PC line allowed coverage of the entire brain with the exception of the lower cerebellum.

Behavioral and imaging data attrition and quality assessment

A total of eight datasets were excluded from the final analysis: three participants whose baseline cotinine levels were less than 50 ng/ml (SRNT, 2002); two participants whose performance on the FRT task was poor (Pr<0); three participants whose BOLD fMRI signal noise ratio (SNR) were poor and/or had excessive (≈ 0.23 mm, greater than 2 Standard Deviations from the mean) head motion, expressed in temporal SNR (tSNR) and the relative volume-to-volume displacement for all subjects. Thus, data from 33 subjects in the high AS group and 30 subjects in the low AS group were included in the final analyses. The follow-up urine sample for cotinine level was obtained from 52 participants (28 in high and 24 in the low AS group) who returned for the follow-up session.

Behavioral data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM Statistical Package of the Social Science (IBM SPSS version19). Subjects’ performance on the Frame Recognition Task was evaluated using the Discrimination Index, Pr = ZCorrect target recognition – ZFalse alarms, which reflects how well one could correctly distinguish targets from foils (Snodgrass and Corwin, 1988). Participants whose Pr was less than or equal to 0 may have been responding at a chance level and were excluded from further analysis. Subjects’ tendency to respond “Yes” or “No” under uncertainty was evaluated using the Response Bias measure, Br = −0.5 (ZCorrect target recognition + ZFalse alarm). Br = 0 indicates no bias, Br < 0 indicates liberal bias (i.e. tendency of saying “Yes” when uncertain), Br > 0 indicates conservative bias (i.e. tendency of saying “No” when uncertain). Change scores for Intention to Quit Smoking (IQS) were calculated as the difference in scores before and after fMRI session (ΔIQS). Independent-samples t-tests were used to compare baseline parameters of the high and low AS groups, including FTND, IQS scores, average number of cigarette per day, cotinine levels, ages and educational levels. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was applied to Pr, to assess the main effects of the within subject variable ‘MSV’ (two levels: high MSV vs. low MSV) and the between subject variable ‘AS_group’ (two levels: high AS vs. low AS), as well as their possible interaction. Partial correlation was applied to examine the relation between ΔIQS and cotinine level at follow-up, controlling for baseline cotinine.

Functional imaging data analysis

BOLD time series data were preprocessed and analyzed by standard procedures using the fMRI Expert Analysis Tool (FEAT version 5.98) of FSL (FMRIB’s Software Library, Oxford, UK). Single subject preprocessing included non-brain removal using BET (Smith, 2002) slice time correction, motion correction to the median image using MCFLIRT (Jenkinson et al., 2002), high-pass temporal filtering (138 s), spatial smoothing using a Gaussian kernel (6 mm full-width at half-maximum, isotropic) and mean-based intensity normalization of all volumes using the same multiplicative factor. The median functional volume was co-registered to the anatomical T1-weighted structural volume and then transformed into the standard anatomical space (MNI T1 template) using FLIRT (Jenkinson and Smith, 2001; Jenkinson et al., 2002). Transformation parameters were later applied to all statistical contrast maps for group-level analyses.

The primary variable was mean percent (%) BOLD signal change. Subject-level statistical analyses were carried out voxel-wise using FILM (FMRIB’s Improved General Linear Model) with local autocorrelation correction (Woolrich et al., 2001). Two condition events (high MSV, low MSV) were modeled using a canonical hemodynamic response function. Six rigid body motion correction parameters were included as nuisance covariates and the rest periods (fixation point) were treated as the baseline. Image analysis was completed for each individual in subject space, and resulting contrast maps of parameter estimates were spatially normalized as described above.

Voxel-wise whole brain analysis

Parameter estimates were entered into an AS (high AS vs. low AS) by MSV (high MSV vs. low MSV) ANOVA treating subjects as random effects variable. Resulting Z (Gaussianised F) statistic maps of AS group by MSV interaction, as well as main effects of AS and MSV, were cluster-corrected at Z≥ 3.1 using theory of Gaussian Random Fields (Beckmann and Smith, 2004). Anatomic assignment of clusters was based on the peak z-score within the cluster using the Talairach Daemon Database confirmed by visual inspection. Mean scaled beta coefficients (% BOLD signal change) from each significant cluster in the interaction map were extracted for graphic examination and further statistical testing.

Correlation Analysis

Linear regression analysis was applied to examine whether the neural response to PSAs (% BOLD signal change) in brain regions associated with the AS by MSV interaction predicted IQS change immediately after the fMRI session, controlling for baseline IQS scores and group (high/low AS). Also, linear regression analysis was applied to examine whether the neural response to PSAs (% BOLD signal change) in brain regions associated with AS by MSV interaction predicted urinary cotinine levels at the one month follow-up, controlling for baseline levels for group (high/low AS). To test the relationship between cotinine levels and brain response, we used % BOLD signal change extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) identified by the preceding whole brain analysis. Such “off-line” correlation analysis has been used by the prior fMRI studies of PSA (Chua et al., 2009; Langleben et al., 2009; Chua et al., 2011). By limiting the number of statistical tests to the few ROIs defined by the preceding whole brain analysis, this approach offers a more appropriate level of control for Type 1 errors than the whole brain correlation (Poldrack, 2007).

Results

Behavioral results

Participants’ behavioral measures at baseline, immediately after MRI and at one-month follow-up were summarized in Table 1. Baseline Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) score was 4.46 ±2.40, baseline cotinine levels were 1458.33 ±1762 ng/ml and baseline IQS was 2.52 ±0.73. The high and low AS groups did not differ in age [t(61)= −0.48, p= 0.63], educational level [t(61)= −0.59, p= 0.56], baseline smoking severity [FTND t(61)= 0.08, p= 0.93, cotinine levels t(61)= 0.28, p= 0.78, average number of cigarettes per day t(61)= 0.82, p= 0.41] or IQS scores [t(61)= −.079, p= 0.44].

Table 1
Summary of behavioral measures.

Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between MSV and AS_group [F(1,61)= 3.90, p= 0.05] on ad frame recognition performance (Figure 1), but no main effect of MSV [F(1,61)= 1.16, p= 0.29] or AS_group [F(1,61)= 1.36, p= 0.25]. High MSV better facilitated frame recognition than low MSV [t(32)= 2.31, p= 0.03] if the PSA AS was strong, while MSV strength had no differential effect on frame recognition [t(29)= −0.594, p= .557] if the PSA AS was weak. Subjects tended to respond liberally when they recalled frames from the Low AS/Low MSV PSAs (Br= −0.133), and conservatively to the frames extracted from other AS/MSV combinations (Br= 0.068, 0.004, 0.089).

Figure 1
Performance of the Frame Recognition Task.

The IQS immediately after PSA exposure was significantly higher than baseline [t(62)= −2.390, p= 0.020]. The change in the IQS (ΔIQS) after the PSA video task was marginally larger in the high AS group (0.288 ±0.097) than in the low AS group (0.033±0.096), [t(61)=1.858, p=0.068]. Furthermore, partial correlation revealed that ΔIQS was negatively correlated with cotinine levels at follow-up (R= −0.342, p= 0.014).

Functional imaging results

A whole brain 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between AS and MSV (Z≥ 3.1, corrected for multiple comparison at p<0.001) (Table 2). The interaction of AS and MSV was observed in the bilateral Inferior Parietal Lobule (IPL), left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG, BA 44-47, extending to BA 10 and 13), left Fusiform Gyrus (FG), the right dorsomedial Prefronal Cortex (dMPFC, peak in BA 8, extending to BA 9 and 32) and the Precuneus (peak in BA 7, extending to BA 32 and 31) (Figure 2). There were also significant main effects of AS and MSV (Z≥ 3.1, corrected for multiple comparisons at p<0.001) (Table 3).

Figure 2
Brain regions associated with AS by MSV interaction and % BOLD signal change in these regions.
Table 2
Brain regions associated with AS by MSV interaction
Table 3
Brain regions associated with main effects of AS and MSV.

Correlation results

Greater activation in the Precuneus during PSA viewing marginally predicted greater intention to quit smoking (beta= 0.167, p= 0.061). In addition, a linear regression analysis showed that follow-up cotinine levels were significantly lower in the high AS group than the low AS group (beta= 0.227, p= 0.021), and among the subjects with greater dMPFC activation (beta= −0.201, p= 0.043) (Figure 3, right panel, r=−0.55).

Figure 3
Left: dMPFC activation associated with AS by MSV interaction. Statistical map (yellow-red scale) is displayed over the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) brain template and thresholded at z=3.1 (cluster corrected at p< 0.001). Right: Correlation ...

To determine whether the dMPFC mediated the relationship between the AS and cotinine levels, we performed a mediation analysis with dMPFC activation as an intervening variable between AS and the follow-up cotinine level and with baseline cotinine level as a covariate. The coefficient for the total effect of AS on cotinine, ignoring dMPFC activation, was 0.21 (p=0.03). When dMPFC activation was included in the model, the regression coefficient for AS was 0.23 (p=0.02), so the effect remained about the same. This was due to the fact that AS did not have a significant effect on dMPFC activation (p=0.32). Thus, though both AS and dMPFC activation affected the cotinine outcome, the AS effect on cotinine outcome was not explained by the dMPFC activation.

Discussion

This is the first longitudinal investigation of the cognitive, behavioral and neurophysiological response to the content and format of televised anti-smoking public service announcements. At the cognitive level, we found that the effect of message sensation value on immediate recall depended on the argument strength of the ad. Higher message sensation value in ads with strong arguments produced better frame recognition, but made no difference when combined with a weak argument. In addition, greater changes in intention to quit smoking were associated with lower urine cotinine levels at follow-up. At the brain level, we characterized regions activated by the interaction of content and format and thus critical to the processing of persuasive messages. These included the bilateral Interior Parietal Lobule (IPL), left Fusiform (FG) and Inferior Frontal Gyri (IFG), right dorsal Medial Prefrontal Cortex (dMPFC) and the Precuneus (Figure 2). Of these regions, the activation in the dMPFC predicted sustained reduction in urinary cotinine levels at a one-month follow-up.

The bilateral occipito-parietal clusters showed symmetrical activations (Figure 2), largest in the High AS/High MSV condition and no difference between high and low MSV in the low AS group. This pattern mirrored the short-term recognition of the ads (Figure 1), consistent with the role of the occipito-parietal cortex in sustained stimulus-driven (exogenous) attention (Johnson and Zatorre, 2006; Indovina and Macaluso, 2007). This finding extends our prior observation (Langleben et al., 2009) that the strength of the audiovisual format of an ad is the primary driver of occipito-parietal (IPL and FG) activation. The fact that occipito-parietal regions were not sensitive to message sensation value under the low argument strength condition fine-tunes this earlier observation and suggests that strong audiovisual format is only effective in attracting visual attention in ads with strong arguments.

The left-sided inferior prefrontal activation encompassed the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, Figure 2) and extended to the prefrontal associative cortices and the anterior insula. Inferior frontal activation is associated with behavioral regulation and control processes (Aron, 2007) as well as cognitive processing. Specifically, the left inferior prefrontal cortex contains language and association areas that are involved in semantic deep processing (Gabrieli et al., 1998), integration and sentence comprehension (Meltzer et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2012). Thus left inferior frontal activation could be interpreted as an indicator of intensity of processing (Demb et al., 1995; Stephenson et al., 2001).

The dorsal MPFC was less active than baseline (“deactivated”) in all ad categories, with greatest deactivation associated with the High AS/High MSV ads. An influential review and meta-analysis describes dMPFC as a region operating in a “dynamic functional range”, activated during tasks that involve self-referential cognition and internally focused attention (Buckner and Carroll, 2007), and deactivated during tasks that involve externally focused attention (Gusnard and Raichle, 2001). Fox et al (2005) described MPFC as task-negative region that is “anti-correlated” to the “task-positive” (Fox et al., 2005) regions such as the IPL, that actively mediate focused attention (Gusnard et al., 2001; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Toro et al., 2008; Vincent et al., 2008). Specifically, concurrent deactivation of dMPFC and activation of IPL has been reported during processing of self-relevant speech (Jardri et al., 2007). In addition to deactivation during exogenous attention, MPFC is activated by thinking about one’s intention and consequential actions (den Ouden et al., 2005; Buckner and Carroll, 2007). Burgess et al (2003) propose that dMPFC plays a role in maintaining an intention to act while performing a concurrent task, which requires withdrawing cognitive resources from the ongoing stimuli (Burgess et al., 2003). Thus, the fMRI signal changes we observed in the dMPFC could well result from the two anti-correlated processes concurrently engaged by ad viewing: deactivation due to exogenous attention and activation due to self-referential processes such as thinking about one’s intentions. Indeed, we found that while the greatest dMPFC deactivation was during viewing of the High AS/High MSV ads, it was dMPFC activation that predicted the long-term reduction in urine cotinine. This suggests that of the four ad categories, the High AS/High MSV ads engaged exogenous attention most but the self-referential cognition and intention formation least.

Precuneus was also deactivated, with the greatest deactivation in the Low AS/Low MSV category. Similarly to dMPFC, Precuneus is engaged in a range of cognitive functions, including deactivation during increased exogenous attention demands (Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Zhang and Li, 2012). Although both Precuneus and MPFC are parts of the Resting State Network (Gusnard et al., 2001; Raichle et al., 2001; Northoff and Bermpohl, 2004), incongruence in the direction of activation between these two regions is not uncommon (Laird et al., 2009; Dastjerdi et al., 2011; Gilbert et al., 2012). dMPFC activation without corresponding Precuneus activation was present in up to half of 72 fMRI and PET studies of emotion and cognition (Phan et al., 2002) and a dissociation between Precuneus and dMPFC activation was observed during active self-referential activities (Whitfield-Gabrieli et al., 2011). Thus, inconsistency in the direction of activation of dMPFC and Precuneus could be expected with complex, emotionally charged, self-referential stimuli such as these anti-smoking ads.

At the behavioral level, we found that the intensity of ad format (message sensation value) only influenced recognition when paired with more persuasive ads. Intensity of ad format made no difference on recognition when presenting a weak argument. Also, we found an increase in the intention to quit smoking (ΔIQS) immediately after ad exposure which is in agreement with prior studies (Park et al., 2006; Park et al., 2007; Updegraff et al., 2007; Strasser et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2011). According to the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein, 2000, 2001), a change in intentions is important for change in behavior. In the context of smoking prevention research, Norman et al. (1999) confirmed that intention to quit smoking (Δ IQS) predicted the number of quit attempts and length of abstinence at 6-month follow-up (Norman et al., 1999). Similarly, we found a significant negative correlation between Δ IQS and cotinine levels at follow-up.

Our data show that dMPFC, IPL and left IFG are key brain areas integrating the content and format of persuasive ads. The finding that dMPFC activation predicted a positive behavioral outcome (i.e. lower cotinine levels a month later) has potential translational significance. Cotinine levels are considered the gold standard measure of nicotine intake for the preceding 3-5 days and are an objective measure of sustained smoking behavior in non-treatment seeking smokers (SRNT, 2002). Our findings are consistent with previous reports showing that dMPFC activation associated with the level of personal relatedness (tailoring) of anti-tobacco messages predicts smoking cessation treatment outcomes (Chua et al., 2009; Chua et al., 2011). Despite the use of different populations of smokers (treatment-seeking vs. non-treatment-seeking) and different stimuli (persuasive statements vs. videos), Chua et al. (2009, 2011) and the current study come to a similar conclusion: dMPFC activation predicts long-term behaviour. This suggests that the predictive value of dMPFC could generalize to all smokers and different forms of persuasive communications.

Our findings should be interpreted with several caveats. First, we evaluated average brain response over the entire length of real-life ads. Future research is required to investigate the frame-by-frame brain response to the changes in ad content and format (Hasson et al., 2010). Second, message sensation value was a within-subject variable, allowing us to assess its brain effects but not the delayed behavioral outcomes. A four-cell design, with both content and format as between-group variables could be used in the future to elucidate the behavioral impact of simultaneously manipulating format and content. Third, the experimental exposure to ads in our study differs from real-life, where it is usually repeated over time. Further studies are required to evaluate the brain and behavioral effects of anti-smoking ads in a naturalistic setting. Finally, we did not control the emotional tone of ad arguments. Therefore extrapolating our findings to emotionally positive or negative ads would require further experimental validation.

Together, our findings have three immediate theoretical and practical public health implications. First, the strength of ad arguments matters more than its audiovisual presentation: Merely increasing ads’ sensory impact may not improve outcomes. Since sensory effects are usually more costly to produce than well thought-through arguments, our observation may be of immediate utility to producers contemplating how to allocate their budgets. Second, since prefrontal BOLD fMRI response to ads may predict their effectiveness, it may have applications in the prerelease evaluation of mass-media video advertising. Finally, by demonstrating the neurophysiological basis of the key concepts in health communication theory, our study sets the stage for science-based evaluation and design of persuasive public health advertising.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  • Aron AR. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist. 2007;13:214–228. [PubMed]
  • Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Hinks RS, Tikofsky RS, Hyde JS. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn Reson Med. 1992;25:390–397. [PubMed]
  • Beckmann CF, Smith SM. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2004;23:137–152. [PubMed]
  • Buckner RL, Carroll DC. Self-projection and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007;11:49–57. [PubMed]
  • Burgess PW, Scott SK, Frith CD. The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:906–918. [PubMed]
  • Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain. 2006;129:564–583. [PubMed]
  • Chua HF, Liberzon I, Welsh RC, Strecher VJ. Neural correlates of message tailoring and self-relatedness in smoking cessation programming. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:165–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chua HF, Ho SS, Jasinska AJ, Polk TA, Welsh RC, Liberzon I, Strecher VJ. Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:426–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cummings KM. Community-wide interventions for tobacco control. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(Suppl 1):S113–116. [PubMed]
  • Dale AM. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8:109–114. [PubMed]
  • Dastjerdi M, Foster BL, Nasrullah S, Rauschecker AM, Dougherty RF, Townsend JD, Chang C, Greicius MD, Menon V, Kennedy DP, Parvizi J. Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non-self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3023–3028. [PubMed]
  • Demb JB, Desmond JE, Wagner AD, Vaidya CJ, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1995;15:5870–5878. [PubMed]
  • den Ouden HE, Frith U, Frith C, Blakemore SJ. Thinking about intentions. Neuroimage. 2005;28:787–796. [PubMed]
  • Donohew L, Lorch EP, Palmgreen P. Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. Human Communication Research. 1998;24:454–468. [PubMed]
  • Durkin S, Brennan E, Wakefield M. Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tob Control. 2012;21:127–138. [PubMed]
  • Emery S, Kim Y, Choi YK, Szczypka G, Wakefield M, Chaloupka FJ. The effects of smoking-related television advertising on smoking and intentions to quit among adults in the United States: 1999-2007. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:751–757. [PubMed]
  • Falk EB, Berkman ET, Whalen D, Lieberman MD. Neural activity during health messaging predicts reductions in smoking above and beyond self-report. Health Psychol. 2011;30:177–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Falk EB, Berkman ET, Mann T, Harrison B, Lieberman MD. Predicting persuasion-induced behavior change from the brain. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010;30:8421–8424. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • First M, editor. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th Edition, Text Revision American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 2002.
  • Fishbein M. The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2000;12:273–278. [PubMed]
  • Fishbein M, Cappella J. The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications. Journal of Communication. 2006;56:S1–S17.
  • Fishbein M, Hall-Jamieson K, Zimmer E, von Haeften I, Nabi R. Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. Am J Public Health. 2002a;92:238–245. [PubMed]
  • Fishbein M, Cappella J, Hornik R, Sayeed S, Yzer M, Ahern R. The role of theory in developing effective anti-drug public service announcement. Lawrence Erblaum Associates; Mawah, N.J: 2002b.
  • Fishbein M, Hennessy M, Kamb M, Bolan GA, Hoxworth T, Iatesta M, Rhodes F, Zenilman JM. Using intervention theory to model factors influencing behavior change. Project RESPECT. Evaluation & the health professions. 2001;24:363–384. [PubMed]
  • Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, Becker MH, Middlestadt SE, Eichler A. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. Lawrence Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 2001.
  • Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:9673–9678. [PubMed]
  • Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE. The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:906–913. [PubMed]
  • Geiger S, Reeves B. The effects of scene changes and semantic relatedness on attention to television. Communication Research. 1993;20:155–175.
  • Gibbons F, Gerrard M, Blanton H, Russell D. Reasoned action and social reaction willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:1164–1180. [PubMed]
  • Gilbert SJ, Bird G, Frith CD, Burgess PW. Does “task difficulty” explain “task-induced deactivation?” Front Psychol. 2012;3:125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gusnard DA, Raichle ME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2:685–694. [PubMed]
  • Gusnard DA, Akbudak E, Shulman GL, Raichle ME. Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: relation to a default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4259–4264. [PubMed]
  • Hasson U, Malach R, Heeger DJ. Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010;14:40–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119–1127. [PubMed]
  • Hersey JC, Niederdeppe J, Ng SW, Mowery P, Farrelly M, Messeri P. How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking. Tob Control. 2005;14:377–383. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Indovina I, Macaluso E. Dissociation of stimulus relevance and saliency factors during shifts of visuospatial attention. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:1701–1711. [PubMed]
  • Jardri R, Pins D, Bubrovszky M, Despretz P, Pruvo JP, Steinling M, Thomas P. Self awareness and speech processing: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2007;35:1645–1653. [PubMed]
  • Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:143–156. [PubMed]
  • Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17:825–841. [PubMed]
  • Johnson JA, Zatorre RJ. Neural substrates for dividing and focusing attention between simultaneous auditory and visual events. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1673–1681. [PubMed]
  • Kang Y, Cappella JN, Fishbein M. The attentional mechanism of message sensation value: Interaction between message sensation value and argument quality on message effectiveness. Communication Monographs. 2006;73:351–378.
  • Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, Kennedy DN, Hoppel BE, Cohen MS, Turner R, Cheng H, Brady T, Rosen B. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:5675–5679. [PubMed]
  • Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, Li K, Robin DA, Glahn DC, Fox PT. Investigating the functional heterogeneity of the default mode network using coordinate-based meta-analytic modeling. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:14496–14505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, Kochunov PV, Nickerson D, Mikiten SA, Fox PT. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10:120–131. [PubMed]
  • Langleben DD, Loughead JR, Ruparel KR, Bush-Winokur S, Strasser AA, Cappella JN, Lerman C. Reduced prefrontal and temporal processing and recall of high “sensation value” ads. Neuroimage. 2009;46:219–225. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lee S, Cappella JN, Lerman C, Strasser AA. Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13:282–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Meltzer JA, McArdle JJ, Schafer RJ, Braun AR. Neural aspects of sentence comprehension: syntactic complexity, reversibility, and reanalysis. Cerebral cortex. 2010;20:1853–1864. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morgan SE. Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements. Journal of Communication. 2003;53:512–526.
  • Morris JD, Klahr NJ, Shen F, Villegas J, Wright P, He G, Liu Y. Mapping a multidimensional emotion in response to television commercials. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008 (in press) [PubMed]
  • Norman P, Conner M, Bell R. The theory of planned behavior and smoking cessation. Health Psychol. 1999;18:89–94. [PubMed]
  • Northoff G, Bermpohl F. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:102–107. [PubMed]
  • Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113. [PubMed]
  • Park H, Levine T, Kingsley Westerman C, Orfgen T, Foregge S. The Effects of Argument Quality and Involvement Type on Attitude Formation and Attitude Change: A Test of Dual-Process and Social Judgment Predictions. Human Communication Research. 2007;33:81–102.
  • Park HS, Levine T, Kingsley Westerman K, Orfgen T, Foregger S. The Effects of Involvement Type and Argument Quality on Attitude Formation and Attitude Change. Human Communication Research. 2006;33:81–102.
  • Petty R, Cacioppo J. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Verlag; New York: 1986.
  • Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2002;16:331–348. [PubMed]
  • Poldrack RA. Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007;2:67–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pomerleau CS, Carton SM, Lutzke ML, Flessland KA, Pomerleau OF. Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addict Behav. 1994;19:33–39. [PubMed]
  • Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:676–682. [PubMed]
  • Rao H, Wang J, Tang K, Pan W, Detre JA. Imaging brain activity during natural vision using CASL perfusion fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28:593–601. [PubMed]
  • Rossiter JR, Silberstein RB. Brain-imaging detection of visual scene encoding in long-term memory for TV commercials. Journal of Advertising Research. 2001 Mar-Apr;41 2001.
  • Sly DF, Hopkins RS, Trapido E, Ray S. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida “truth” campaign. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:233–238. [PubMed]
  • Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17:143–155. [PubMed]
  • Snodgrass JG, Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of experimental psychology General. 1988;117:34–50. [PubMed]
  • Sobell L, Sobell M. Timeline follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten R, Allen J, editors. Measuring Alcohol Consumption. Human Press; Clifton: 1992. pp. 41–72.
  • Soon CS, Brass M, Heinze HJ, Haynes JD. Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:543–545. [PubMed]
  • SRNT Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4:149–159. [PubMed]
  • Stephenson M, Benoit W, Tschida D. Testing the mediating role of cognitive responses in the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Communication Studies. 2001;52:324–337.
  • Strasser AA, Cappella JN, Jepson C, Fishbein M, Tang KZ, Han E, Lerman C. Experimental evaluation of antitobacco PSAs: effects of message content and format on physiological and behavioral outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:293–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Toro R, Fox PT, Paus T. Functional coactivation map of the human brain. Cerebral cortex. 2008;18:2553–2559. [PubMed]
  • Updegraff J, Sherman D, Faith S, Luyster F, Mann T. The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007;43:249–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vincent JL, Kahn I, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME, Buckner RL. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:3328–3342. [PubMed]
  • Wakefield M, Szczypka G, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, Flay B, Chaloupka F, Saffer H. Mixed messages on tobacco: comparative exposure to public health, tobacco company- and pharmaceutical company-sponsored tobacco-related television campaigns in the United States, 1999-2003. Addiction. 2005;100:1875–1883. [PubMed]
  • Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Moran JM, Nieto-Castanon A, Triantafyllou C, Saxe R, Gabrieli JD. Associations and dissociations between default and self-reference networks in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2011;55:225–232. [PubMed]
  • Whittingstall K, Bartels A, Singh V, Kwon S, Logothetis NK. Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:1135–1142. [PubMed]
  • WHO . WHO global report: mortality attributable to tobacco. World Health Organization; 2012.
  • Woolrich MW, Ripley BD, Brady M, Smith SM. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data. Neuroimage. 2001;14:1370–1386. [PubMed]
  • Zhang S, Li CS. Functional connectivity mapping of the human precuneus by resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3548–3562. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhao X, Strasser A, Cappella J, Lerman C, Fishbein M. A measure of perceived argument strength: Reliability and validity in health communication contexts. Communication Methods and Measures. 2011;5:48–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zhu Z, Hagoort P, Zhang JX, Feng G, Chen HC, Bastiaansen M, Wang S. The anterior left inferior frontal gyrus contributes to semantic unification. Neuroimage. 2012;60:2230–2237. [PubMed]