PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brazjmicroLink to Publisher's site
 
Braz J Microbiol. 2011 Oct-Dec; 42(4): 1420–1426.
Published online 2011 December 1. doi:  10.1590/S1517-838220110004000025
PMCID: PMC3768743

ERIC-PCR genotypic characterization of Haemophilus parasuis isolated from Brazilian swine

Abstract

Haemophilus parasuis infection, known as Glässer’s disease, is characterized by fibrinous polyserositis, arthritis and meningitis in piglets. Although traditional diagnosis is based on herd history, clinical signs, bacterial isolation and serotyping, the molecular-based methods are alternatives for species-specific tests and epidemiologic study. The aim of this study was to characterize H. parasuis strains isolated from different states of Brazil by serotyping, PCR and ERIC-PCR. Serotyping revealed serovar 4 as the most prevalent (24 %), followed by serovars 14 (14 %), 5 (12 %), 13 (8 %) and 2 (2 %), whereas 40 % of the strains were considered as non-typeable. From 50 strains tested 43 (86%) were positive to Group 1 vtaA gene that have been related to virulent strains of H.parasuis. ERIC-PCR was able to type isolates tested among 23 different patterns, including non-typeable strains. ERIC-PCR patterns were very heterogeneous and presented high similarity between strains of the same animal or farm origin. The results indicated ERIC-PCR as a valuable tool for typing H. parasuis isolates collected in Brazil.

Keywords: Haemophilus parasuis, Glässer disease, Genotyping, ERIC-PCR

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilus parasuis is the etiological agent of Glässer’s disease which is characterized by fibrinous polyserositis, arthritis and meningitis that can affect pigs from 2 weeks to 4 months old (11). It is a non-motile, pleomorphic, Gram-negative bacillus of the Pasturellacea family, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) dependent bacterium (1) which colonizes the upper respiratory tract of pigs before weaning (20). Therefore, samples of pleura, peritoneum, joints and meninges are preferable for clinical diagnosis (17), since H. parasuis can be isolated from the upper respiratory tract of healthy pigs.

The strains of H. parasuis were classified by serotyping in 15 serovars and demonstrated differences in their virulence, classifying strains from highly virulent to non-virulent (7). However, no clear correlation between serovar and virulence has been defined, since strains belonging to the same serotype can exhibit different degrees of virulence. Nevertheless, serotyping has been useful for vaccine production, but it is not discriminative enough for epidemiologic studies, since 15 to 41% of the isolates are non-typeable through the Kielstein and Rapp-Gabrielson (KRG) serotyping method (15, 22). For this reason, molecular methods have been developed to improve diagnosis and epidemiological characterization of H. parasuis.

Santos et al. (23) first described high incidence of serovars 1, 4, 5 and 12, which were considered from moderate to high virulence. Since then, few studies have been developed with H. parasuis in Brazil, but the epidemiology of the infection is still unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize Haemophilus parasuis isolates collected in different States in Brazil, by serotyping, PCR and ERIC-PCR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

Fifty isolates were evaluated in this study. The strains were isolated from lungs of 23 pigs with clinical signs of arthritis, meningitis, peritonitis and/or pericarditis, in 21 herds from four different States (Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Paraná and São Paulo) in Brazil. All isolates were maintained at -80oC until analysis.

Serotyping

The strains were grown on Brain Heart Infusion (BHI – Difco-BBL, Detroit, MI /USA) supplemented with NAD (0.01 %) and fetal calf serum (5 %) from 24 to 48 h at 37oC, under microaerophilic conditions (5 % of CO2). Serotyping was carried out on 50 isolates by immunodiffusion test using autoclaved antigens (7) at the Microvet Laboratory of Veterinary Microbiology, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

DNA preparation and PCR

Purified DNA was recovered with Boom et al. (3) protocol of DNA extraction and stored at –20ºC. The 50 strains were identified by PCR based on species-specific amplification of the 16S rRNA gene as described by Oliveira et al. (12) and by amplification of Groups 1 and 3 vtaA genes described by Olvera et al. (19). The PCR directed to 16S rRNA gene was performed in a 20µl reaction mixture containing 1 µl of extracted DNA, 0.3 mM of each primer, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 µl of PCR buffer, 0.24 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (LGC Biotecnologia, São Paulo, Brazil). The PCR was carried out for 30 cycles consisting of denaturation for 30 seconds at 94 oC, annealing for 30 seconds at 59 oC, and extension for 2 minutes at 72 C. The PCR to detect Groups 1 and 3 vtaA genes was performed in a 25µl reaction mixture containing 2.5 µl of extracted DNA, 800 mM of primer YADAF1 e PADHR1, 400 mM dos primers YADAF3 e PADHR3, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 5 µl of PCR buffer, 0.4 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (LGC Biotecnologia, São Paulo, Brazil). Cycling conditions were 5 min at 94oC, followed by 25 cycles of 45s at 94oC, 45s at 64oC and 1 min at 72oC, then a final incubation at 72oC for 7 min.

The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.5 % or 2.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The 100bp DNA ladder (LGC Biotecnologia, São Paulo, Brazil) was used for molecular weight determinations.

Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Sequences (ERIC-PCR)

ERIC-PCR was performed as described previously by Versalovic et al. (25), using 5 μl from extracted DNA, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 10 pmoles from primers ERIC1 (ATGTAA GCTCCTGGGGATTCAC) and ERIC2 (AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG), 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase (LGC Biotecnologia, São Paulo, Brazil), 1 X of PCR buffer and water to complete the total volume of 50 μl. PCR reaction was carried out with 35 cycles consisting of denaturation for 4 min at 94oC, annealing for 60 sec at 50oC, and extension of 2.5 min at 72oC, increased with a final extension of 20 min at 72oC as described by Raffie et al. (21). Amplification products were detected through electrophoresis at 35 V for 20 h in 2 % Agarose 1000 (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA/USA) gel stained with ethidium bromide.

Data analysis

ERIC-PCR fingerprints analysis and similarity matrix calculations were carried out using Simple Matching coefficient and cluster analysis of fingerprints was performed using the unweighted-pair group method (UPGMA) by means of the NTSYS software to generate dendrogram. A 90% cut-off was used to analyze the genotypes generated by ERIC-PCR technique according to Oliveira et al. (13). Discriminatory index was calculated as described by Hunter and Gaston (6).

RESULTS

Serotyping and PCR

Serovar 4 was the most prevalent (24 %), followed by serovars 14 (14 %), 5 (12 %), 13 (8 %) and 2 (2 %), whereas 40 % of the strains were considered non-typeable. Strains from different serovars were identified on specimens from the same animal and same farm, as showed by Table 1. All tested strains were positive to species-specific amplification of the 16S rRNA gene as described by Oliveira et al. (12) and to Group 3 vtaA gene described by Olvera et al. (19). From 50 strains tested 43 (86%) were positive to Group 1 vtaA gene.

Table 1
Serovar distribution of H. parasuis isolates according with animal, farm of origin, State and year of isolation.

ERIC-PCR analysis

All 50 strains were examined and identified with the ERIC-PCR technique. Analysis of ERIC profiles utilizing a 90% cut-off revealed 23 distinct genotypes. ERIC patterns for H. parasuis isolates were highly heterogeneous, with DNA fragments ranging from 150 to 1300 bp in size. The ERIC-PCR dendrogram (Figure 1) distributed the 50 H. parasuis strains in two main groups with more than 70% of similarity. Group I comprised composed by 36 of tested strains from profiles 1 to 13. Inside these subtypes, strains from same animal and farm origin were clustered in an identical genotype, as well as strains from different animals, farms, state and even from different serotypes, were grouped in the same genetic profile. Group II comprised profiles 14 to 23 with H. parasuis isolates, ranging from 80% to 100% of similarity, 9 of which were non-typeable by serotyping.

Figure 1
ERIC-PCR dendrogram. Percentages of similarity between profiles were calculated by use of Dice’s coefficient. The dendrogram was constructed by use of UPGMA (unweighted pair group method using arithmetic average).

Discriminatory power

The discriminatory index obtained for serotyping and ERIC-PCR were 0.75 and 0.95, respectively.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the application of the molecular typing method, ERIC-PCR, PCR and traditional serotyping method were used to characterize Haemophilus parasuis strains isolated from swine of different states in Brazil. Serotyping was able to characterize 60% of the isolates among five different serovars, including highly pathogenic strains (serovars 5, 13 and 14). The serovar 4 was the most prevalent (24%) among H. parasuis strains; however, more than 40% of the isolates tested were non-typeable by serotyping, which is compliant with Oliveira and Pijoan (15) findings that reported non-typable isolates as one of the most prevalent in United States herds. Macedo et al. (8) also reported high prevalence of serovar 4 (15.9%) and non-typeable (60.3%) strains on Brazilian territory. The occurrence of non-typeable strains is one limitation of serotyping as an epidemiological tool. For this reason, other techniques such as molecular methods are being developed to improve the study of the H. parasuis epidemiology.

Olvera et al (19) developed a PCR to characterize trimeric autotransporters genes (vtaA) associated to virulence, they describe that group 3 vtaA gene seems to be conserved among invasive and non-invasive strains and may be used to species identification, while group 1 vtaA gene showed better correlation with virulent strains. In the present study, all strains were isolated from lungs of swine with clinical signs of Glasser´s disease and the frequency of vtaA1 gene was high as could be expected (86%). Olvera et al, (19), also describe the occurrence of vtaA1 negative isolates from lungs as observed in seven strains examined here. In some cases were selected more than one isolate from the same animal, and was observed that six of seven vtaA1 negative strains were isolated from animals also carrying vtaA1positive H. parasuis strains (Figure 1- profiles 1, 3, 4 and 11).

Smart et al. (24) started the genotyping study of H. parasuis using REP (Restriction Endonuclease Pattern) technique to differentiate samples of the respiratory tract from isolates of the systemic infection. Other genotyping methods such as Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MEE), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), and more recently the fingerprinting and sequencing methods proved to be able to characterize different isolates of H. parasuis presenting highly heterogeneous patterns (2, 4, 5, 9, 13, 16, 18). However, most of these methods are long-lasting and expensive; therefore, an alternative technique to overcome these hindrances is ERIC-PCR.

Rafiee et al. (21) reported the use of ERIC-PCR to characterize isolates of H. parasuis. The method proved to be able to typify all isolates according to origin and serovar in a short period of time and at low cost. Oliveira et al. (14) and Olvera et al. (17) also validated ERIC-PCR as a useful technique and confirmed the high heterogeneity of H. parasuis isolates. However, they confirmed as well the low reproducibility of the technique which could hinder intra-laboratory comparisons. Macedo et al. (8) first used ERIC-PCR technique to characterize Brazilian H. parasuis strains and reported, not only that this genotyping method was more discriminatory than serotyping, but also a high genetic diversity among non-typeable strains and the isolates originated from respiratory tract. These results sustain the high genetic variability found in this study.

ERIC-PCR proved to be a valuable method for H. parasuis typing, since it discriminated all 50 strains tested, including the non-typeable isolates, among 23 genotypes. It was capable to distinguish isolates of the same and different serovars and, therefore, it is a useful epidemiological tool. Some profiles, as Genotype 4 and 12, comprises samples of the same serovar, animal and farm of origin, but one of them was characterized as non-typeable by serotyping. This could be explained by possible lost of cellular components of capsule naturally or after several reactivations at the laboratory, resulting in the change of serovar type, a fact previously described for lung tissue specimens (10, 22).

Discriminatory power of ERIC-PCR was higher than serotyping, confirming the statement that serotyping is a poor epidemiological tool for the study of H. parasuis, when compared to genotyping methods, such as ERIC-PCR. Although ERIC-PCR proved to be an interesting technique to analyze bacterial samples, its low reproducibility still represents impairment to the future use of the method in intra-laboratory comparisons. Therefore, the optimization of genotyping methods to analyze H. parasuis, and the study of other pathogenic and virulence mechanisms of the bacterium are necessary to improve its epidemiological study and provide practical information to implement effective prevention and control programs at swine farms in Brazil.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was sponsored by FAPESP (process: 07/04893–9).

REFERENCES 5

1. Biberstein E.L., White D.C. A proposal for the establishment of two new Haemophilus species. J. Med. Microbiol. 1969;2:75–78. [PubMed]
2. Blackall P.J., Trott D.J., Rapp-Gabrielson V., Hampson D.J. Analysis of Haemophilus parasuis by Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis. Vet. Microbiol. 1997;56:125–134. [PubMed]
3. Boom R., Sol C.J.A., Salimans M.M.M., Jansen C.L., Wertheim-Van Dillen P.M., Van Der Noorda J. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990;28:459–453.
4. De La Puente Redondo V.A., Méndez J.N., García Del Blanco N., Boronát N.L., Martín C.B.G., Ferri E.F.R. Typing of Haemophilus parasuis strains by PCR-RFLP analysis of tha tbpA gene. Vet. Microbiol. 2003;92:253–262. [PubMed]
5. Del Rio M.L., Martin C.B., Navas J., Gutierrez-Muniz B., Rodriguez-Barbosa J.L., Rodriguez Ferri E.F. aroA gene PCR-RFLP diversity patterns in Haemophilus parasuis and Actinobacillus species. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006;80:55–61. [PubMed]
6. Hunter P.R., Gaston M.A. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson´s index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988;26:2465–2466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Kielstein P., Rapp-Gabrielson V. J. Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-sable antigen extracts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992;30:862–865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Macedo N. R., Oliveira S. R., Lage A. P., Santos J. L., Araújo M. R., Guedes R. M. C. ERIC-PCR genotyping of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from Brazilian pigs. Vet. J. 2010 doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.05.024. [PubMed]
9. Millan A. S., Escudero J. A., Catalan A., Nieto S., Farelo F., Gilbert M., Moreno M. A., Dominguez L., Gonzalez-Zorn B. β-Lactam resistence in Haemophilus parasuis is mediated by plasmid pB 1000 bearing bla ROB-1.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2260–2264. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Morozumi T., Nicolet J. Morphological variations of Haemophilus parasuis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1986;23:138–142. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Nicolet J. Diseases of swine. Iowa state university press; 1992. Haemophilus parasuis.
12. Oliveira S., Galina L., Pijoan C. Development of a PCR test to diagnose Haemophilus parasuis infections. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2001;13:495–501. [PubMed]
13. Oliveira S., Blackall P.J., Pijoan C. Characterization of the diversity of Haemophilus parasuis field isolates by use of serotyping and genotyping. American J. Vet. Research. 2003;64:435–442. [PubMed]
14. Oliveira S., Oleson T., Titus M.D., Simonson R. Comparision of Haemophilus parasuis genotyping using amplified fragment lenght polymorphism (AFLP) and ERC-PCR. Am. Ass. Swine Vet. 2004:273–276.
15. Oliveira S., Pijoan C. Haemophilus parasuis: new trends on diagnosis epidemiology and control. Vet. Microbiol. 2004;99:1–12. [PubMed]
16. Oliveira S. Haemophilus parasuis diagnostics. J. Swine Health Prod. 2007;15:99–103.
17. Olvera A., Calsamiglia M., Aragon V. Genotypic diversity of Haemophilus parasuis field strains. App. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:3984–3992. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Olvera A., Cerdà-Cuéllar M., Aragon V. Study of the population structure of Haemophilus parasuis by multilocus sequence typing. Microbiology. 2006;152:3683–3690. [PubMed]
19. Olvera A., Pina S., Macedo N., Oliveira S., Aragon V., Bensaid A. Identification of potentially virulent strains of Haemophilus parasuis using a multiplex PCR for virulence associated autotransporters (vtaA) Vet. J. 2011 doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.12.014. [PubMed]
20. Pijoan C., Trigo F. Bacterial adhesion to mucosal surfaces with special reference to Pasteurella multocida isolates from atrophic rhinitis. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1990;54:16–21. [PubMed]
21. Rafiee M., Bara M., Stephens C.P., Blackall P.J. Application of ERIC-PCR for the comparison of isolates of Haemophilus parasuis. Aust. Vet. J. 2000;78(12):846–849. [PubMed]
22. Rapp-Gabrielson V.J., Oliveira S.R., Pijoan C. Straw Zimmerman, D`Alleire Taylor. Diseases of swine. Blackwell Publishing; 2006. Haemophilus parasuis; pp. 681–690.
23. Santos J.L., Leite R.C., Abreu V.L.V. IPVS Congress, 278: Birmingham; 1998. The frequency of Haemophilus parasuis serovars in Brazil.
24. Smart N.L., Hurnik D., MacInnes J.I. An investigation of enzootic Glasser’s disease in a specific pathogen-free grower–finisher facility using restriction endonuclease analysis. Can. Vet. J. 1993;34:487–490. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski J.R. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:6823–6831. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier