PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 September 6.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3764481
NIHMSID: NIHMS500470

TGF-β and αvβ6 integrin act in a common pathway to suppress pancreatic cancer progression

Abstract

The TGFβ pathway is under active consideration as a cancer drug target based on its capacity to promote cancer cell invasion and to create a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment. However, the clinical application of TGFβ inhibitors remains uncertain as genetic studies demonstrate a tumor suppressor function of TGFβ in pancreatic cancer and other epithelial malignancies. Here, we used genetically engineered mouse models to investigate the therapeutic impact of global TGFβ inhibition in pancreatic cancer in relation to tumor stage, genetic profile, and concurrent chemotherapy. We found that αvβ6 integrin acted as a key upstream activator of TGFβ in evolving pancreatic cancers. In addition, TGFβ or αvβ6 blockade increased tumor cell proliferation and accelerated both early and later disease stages. These effects were dependent on the presence of Smad4, a central mediator of TGFβ signaling. Therefore, our findings indicate that αvβ6 and TGFβ act in a common tumor suppressor pathway whose pharmacologic inactivation promotes pancreatic cancer progression.

Keywords: pancreatic cancer, Transforming growth factor beta, Smad4, beta6 integrin, cancer therapeutics

Introduction

The transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling pathway is an evolutionarily conserved regulator of embryonic patterning and cell differentiation, and has central roles in wound healing and inflammation (1). The activated TGFβ receptor (TGFβR1/R2) phosphorylates the Smad2 and Smad3 proteins, which modulate transcription in association with Smad4. This pathway has been the subject of intense investigation in cancer due to its potential to act in both a pro- and anti-tumorigenic manner (2). Depending on cross-talk with other pathways, TGFβ can inhibit proliferation and suppress transformation by modulating expression of cell cycle regulators. Alternatively TGFβ can promote malignant growth through multiple mechanisms including enhanced cancer cell invasion, survival, matrix remodeling, fibrosis, and immunosuppression.

As in other epithelial cancers, TGFβ pathway function in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) appears complex. Inactivating mutations in SMAD4 and other pathway components are present in ~50% of human PDAC and cooperate with activated KrasG12D to promote PDAC in mouse models (36). However, TGFβ ligands are commonly over-expressed in PDAC, and can promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion in cell lines (7, 8). TGFβ can also induce angiogenesis, activate tumor-promoting myofibroblasts (stellate cells), and attenuate immune surveillance (9, 10). In light of these observations, TGFβ inhibitors are under investigation as PDAC therapeutics and have shown efficacy in xenograft studies (11, 12).

The multifaceted and cell-type specific effects of TGFβ inhibition present problems in fully assessing the clinical utility of drugs against this pathway. Such effects are likely to be best-understood using native cancer models that appropriately recapitulate tumor-stroma interactions as well as the multistage progression that defines human cancers. Here, we investigated the upstream regulation of TGFβ signaling in the pancreas to establish new strategies to target the pathway, and we examined the impact of pharmacologic inactivation of multiple TGFβ signaling components using genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models of PDAC. These studies, carried out in the context of sequential tumor stages, different genetic lesions, and combined treatments with cytotoxic chemotherapies, failed to reveal a therapeutic window. Instead we found multiple settings where disease was exacerbated by TGFβ inhibition. This preclinical information does not presently support the utility of broadly targeting this pathway in PDAC.

Materials & Methods

Mouse models

All treatment studies were conducted in accordance to UCAR and institutional standards using previously described mouse strains (5). Littermates were distributed among 1D11 (anti-Tgfβ), 13C4 (IgG isotype control), and 3G9 (anti-αvβ6) groups (13, 14). Gemcitabine was dosed at 100mg/kg IP twice weekly. Mice were treated at age six weeks and euthanized at 12 weeks (PanIN study) or at nine weeks until exhibiting signs of illness (PDAC study). In the PDAC cohort four long-lived controls were sacrificed and censored after 20 weeks of age when all mice in the experimental cohorts had died. These animals were free of signs of illness but upon pathologic evaluation were found to have advanced PanIN or early cancers.

Histological analysis

PanIN/PDAC tumor burden was determined by serial analysis of >3 H&E sections through the longitudinal plain of the pancreas. A gastrointestinal pathologist (V.D.) determined percentage of pancreas occupied by normal tissue, PanIN and PDAC, in a blinded fashion.

Antibodies: for αvβ6, the mAb 6.2A1 (14) used at 1:100 in human tissue or the human/mouse chimeric form of 6.2A1 (ch6.2A1) in mouse tissue (15) used at 1:100; for phospho (Ser465/467)-Smad2, Cat#AB3849 (Millipore Corporation); for endothelial cells, the rat endomucin v.7C7 (Santa Cruz) used at 1:50; for pericytes, NG2 Cat# AB5320 (Chemicon) used at 1:200; for Ki-67, NCL-Ki67p (Novocastra); for macrophages, the anti-CD68-M antibody, MCA1957T (Serotech); for total T-cells, the anti-CD3 antibody, Cat# RM-9107-S (Lab vision/Neomarkers); for Foxp3, Cat#14-5773 (eBioscience).

Quantification of IHC/ IF

Staining for CD68, FoxP3 and phospho-Smad2 was quantified by scanning slides at 20× using the Aperio-XT automated imaging system. Regions of interest where identified within the tissues for quantification of DAB positive CD68 and Foxp3 stained cells. For phospho-SMAD2 quantification, we used an automated algorithm to quantify the level of nuclear DAB staining on a scale ranging from 0, +1, +2 and +3. Ki-67 staining was quantified by pathologic evaluation as the percent of neoplastic cells with positive staining.

Statistical analysis

Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were determined using the Log-rank test. Animals showing signs of illness and with confirmed cancers were included as events, whereas animals that died for reasons other than cancer were censored. Histological scores for disease burden, Ki67, and P-smad2 staining between treatment groups compared using t-tests. β6 IHC scoring was compared by the Mann Whitney test.

Results

PDAC evolves from premalignant lesions including acinar-to-ductal metaplasia (ADM) and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) (16). We evaluated the activation status of the TGFβ pathway during PDAC progression via immunohistochemical staining for Serine465/467-phosphorylated Smad2 (phospho-Smad2) in the Ptf1-Cre;LSL-KrasG12D;p53L/+ (Kras-p53Lox/+) model. Phospho-Smad2 was elevated in ADM and early PanINs compared to normal ductal and acinar cells, and remained at high levels throughout PDAC progression (Figure 1A, upper panels, yellow arrowheads). Stromal fibroblasts also showed strong nuclear P-Smad2 staining (Figure 1A, red arrowheads).

Fig 1
αvβ6 activates TGFβ in the pancreatic epithelium

Previous studies have documented increased expression of TGFβ ligands in PDAC progression (5). Because TGFβ is produced as a latent complex, additional processes such as proteolytic cleavage or conformational changes are required to activate signaling. To determine the basis for TGFβ activation, we examined the expression pattern of αvβ6, a candidate activator of latent TGFβ that is upregulated in advanced tumors (15, 17). In mice, αvβ6 was absent in islet and acinar cells and at low to moderate levels in normal ducts, whereas expression was increased throughout each stage of PDAC progression (Figure 1A, lower panels). Expression of αvβ6 was restricted to transformed pancreatic ductal epithelium with no evidence of staining in the stromal microenvironment. Human specimens showed a similar αvβ6 expression profile, with staining in low- and high-grade PanIN lesions and most PDAC, with normal human ducts showing only weak staining (Figure 1B). The correlation between induction of αvβ6 expression and phospho-Smad2 in PanIN and PDAC suggests this integrin may be important in local activation of TGFβ signaling in ductal lesions.

To examine the relationship between αvβ6 function and TGFβ signaling we treated Kras-p53Lox/+ mice with an αvβ6 blocking IgG monoclonal antibody (3G9) (14), a pan-TGFβ blocking IgG monoclonal antibody, 1D11 (13), or an isotype control antibody (13C4). Anti-αvβ6 treatment strongly decreased phospho-Smad2 expression in PanIN and PDAC lesions as well as surrounding stroma (Figure 1C). Collectively, our data indicate that αvβ6 is critical for activation of TGFβ signaling in the neoplastic epithelium.

Targeting TGFβ signaling could limit PDAC growth by blocking TGFβ-mediated pro-tumorigenic effects on the microenvironment and on the invasiveness of cancer cells. Moreover, αvβ6 inhibition could serve to inactivate TGFβ signaling in a restricted manner, limiting the effects of a pharmacologic blockade to the diseased pancreas. To test these possibilities we used the anti-TGFβ, anti-αvβ6, and isotype control antibodies in the Kras-p53Lox/+ model. To evaluate the impact of treatments on progression of preinvasive lesions antibodies were administered at 5 weeks of age— when the pancreas is largely normal but contains focal early stage PanINs (schematic in Fig. 2A). Pancreases were evaluated for the presence of gross tumors and by correlative histological and immunohistochemical analysis at 12 weeks. Anti-αvβ6 treated animals had increases in the proportion of the pancreas exhibiting PanIN or PDAC lesions compared to controls (mean = 73% in 3G9 vs. 45% control; p=0.04; Figure 2B, upper row), as well as a higher frequency of invasive PDAC (66%, versus 33% in controls). Comparable increases in neoplasia were observed in anti-Tgfβ treated mice. Therefore, blocking αvβ6 accelerated the course of PanIN initiation and progression, leading to a larger burden of disease and more advanced tumors.

Fig 2
TGFβ or αvβ6 blockade accelerates PDAC initiation and progression in GEM models

Acceleration in progression of PanIN lesions among anti-Tgfβ and anti-αvβ6 treated mice was associated with an increase in proliferation as reflected by Ki67 staining (Figure 2B, lower row). Consistent with this we observed that 4/5 primary pancreatic ductal cell cultures with activated Kras demonstrated growth inhibition in responses to TGFβ treatments. We failed to observe significant alterations in stromal components that can be activated by TGFβ, including the stellate cells (smooth muscle actin), Tregs (FoxP3), macrophages (CD68), the desmoplastic stroma (qRT-PCR analysis for collagen-1) and vasculature (endomucin and NG2) (Supplemental Figure 1A–C). Thus, these data indicate that the αvβ6-TGFβ pathway has a primary role in restraining proliferation and malignant progression of PanIN epithelial cells.

Since both TGFβ and αvβ6 signaling have been implicated in the induction of EMT and invasive growth of established cancers, we next sought to test whether the anti-TGFβ and anti-αvβ6 antibodies had a differential impact at later disease stages. Kras-p53Lox/+ mice were treated beginning at 9–10 weeks of age, when either high grade PanINs (PanIN-3) or locally invasive PDAC were present (schema in Fig. 2C, upper). Mice were treated until signs of illness necessitated euthanasia. Notably, overall survival was significantly diminished in the anti-TGFβ and anti-αvβ6 groups demonstrating a persistent role for TGFβ in suppressing growth at later stages of disease (Figure 2C, lower left). Histopathological analysis revealed treated tumors to be invasive PDAC showing a range of histological differentiation. Blocking antibodies did not produce significant differences in the spectrum of tumor grade and histological subtypes (Supplemental Figure 2A&B).

The PDAC stroma is a potential barrier to effective delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to tumor cells (18). Based on the potential function of TGFβ signaling in activating stromal fibroblasts, we tested whether TGFβ blockade influenced the response of the Kras-p53Lox/+ model to gemcitabine, a standard chemotherapy. The addition of αvβ6 or TGFβ blocking antibodies to standard gemcitabine treatment led to a diminished survival as compared with gemcitabine alone (Figure 2C, bottom right). Therefore, αvβ6 and TGFβ restrain the initiation and progression of PDAC, apparently through functions on the neoplastic epithelium; potential positive roles of αvβ6 and TGFβ in stromal regulation may have a less prominent impact on tumorigenesis.

Our work shows that αvβ6 is a critical component of the TGFβ-Smad4 tumor suppressor pathway in PDAC. Correspondingly, reduced αvβ6 expression could serve as an alternative mechanism to SMAD4 mutations as a means to inactivate the TGFβ pathway during PDAC progression. To examine this question, we performed IHC analysis across a set of PDAC specimens derived from Smad4 wild type and Smad4 null mouse models using antibodies to αvβ6. While all the tumors with Smad4 mutations expressed αvβ6 at higher levels in invasive tumors compared to PanINs, we found that ~26% of Smad4 wild type tumors lost αvβ6 expression (Figure 3A). Importantly, the absence of αvβ6 staining correlated with SMAD4 status (p=0.01). The spontaneous loss of expression of αvβ6 among Smad4 wild-type tumors, but never in combination with Smad4 mutation, supports the view that αvβ6 is a central activator of the TGFβ-SMAD4 tumor suppressor pathway, and suggests that molecular alterations of both upstream and downstream components promote PDAC tumorigenesis.

Fig 3
αvβ6 functions through Smad4 tumor suppressor in the pancreas

To test more directly whether αvβ6 acts in a common TGFβ/Smad4 tumor suppressor pathway, we assessed the impact of 3G9 on a Kras-driven PDAC model that also has an engineered homozygous deletion of Smad4 and therefore has defective TGFβ signaling in the pancreatic epithelial cells (5). Treatment was started at the time when focal PDAC is present, and maintained until signs of illness required euthanasia. In contrast to their effects in the Smad4 wild-type Kras-p53Lox/+ model, αvβ6 blocking antibodies did not alter the latency or histopathologic features of Smad4 null tumors (Figure 3B). Therefore, genetic inactivation of TGFβ signaling obviates the effect of αvβ6 blockade on tumorigenesis, consistent with a predominant action of the blocking antibodies in inhibiting epithelial TGFβ-Smad4 signaling.

Discussion

Here we show that TGFβ pathway blockade with specific monoclonal antibodies to αvβ6 or TGFβ1–3 accelerated PDAC progression in GEM models. This effect was observed when using antibodies at early and later disease stages, and as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine. While tumorigenesis was not accelerated in a GEM model lacking Smad4, αvβ6/TGFβ inhibition did not provide any appreciable benefit in this setting. While it is possible that αvβ6/TGFβ pathway inhibition may restrain aspects of malignancy such as metastatic spread, our data indicate that there may be risks in broadly targeting this pathway given its primary function as a tumor suppressor.

Recent findings have supported the ability of GEM models to recapitulate therapeutic responses seen in patients (19). Our experiments illustrate a number of potential advantages of GEM models, such as the capacity to evaluate the impact of an intervention at different disease stages including pre-invasive disease, and in defined tumor genotypes. Whereas preclinical studies in xenografts have supported the use of TGFβ pathway inhibitors in the treatment of PDAC, our work indicates this strategy carries risk in the context of autochthonous tumors.

It remains possible that there may be contexts in which inhibition of components of the αvβ6-TGFβ pathway may prove beneficial in PDAC treatment. Both αvβ6 and TGFβ have been implicated in metastasis, which we were not able to address definitively in our studies (1/7 controls and 1/15 treated mice exhibited metastasis, which was insufficient to provide statistical significance). In addition, while direct targeting of αvβ6 or TGFβ may carry risks, it is possible that downstream effectors of the pathway have strictly tumor-promoting effects, and thus may be effective targets for pharmacologic blockade. Along these lines a recent study showed TGFβ activates CxC chemokine signaling in a PDAC GEM model and that inhibition delays tumor progression (20).

Our studies also reveal new insights into the mechanisms of TGFβ activation in the pancreas and the contributions of this pathway in multi-stage PDAC progression. We show that global inactivation of TGFβ signaling promotes increased proliferation of the PanIN epithelial cells and enhances PDAC initiation and progression in a Smad4 dependant manner. Although TGFβ likely has additional functions in regulating the PDAC microenvironment, these functions do not appear essential for either the tumor promotion or tumor suppression. We also identify αvβ6 as a critical upstream regulator of TGFβ signaling in the ductal epithelium and demonstrate that αvβ6 has a previously unanticipated function in tumor suppression. αvβ6 blockade attenuated Smad2 activation, produced similar biological effects to TGFβ blockade in our mouse models, and did not affect the progression of Smad4 null tumors. Thus, while αvβ6 has been shown to promote invasive growth of advanced cancers, our data indicate that the primary function of αvβ6 in the pancreas is to serve as an upstream component of the TGFβ tumor suppression program. It is worth noting that PDAC in the Kras-Smad4 model arise from cystic precursors rather than PanIN (3, 5), which could also contribute to the differential response to pathway inhibition in this setting.

In summary, this series of experiments highlight the use of GEM cancer models to guide in the clinical development of novel therapeutics and to elucidate signaling pathway circuitry in vivo. We show that αvβ6 and TGFβ act in a common Smad4-dependent PDAC tumor suppressor pathway. Moreover, we conclude that broad use of TGFβ inhibitors in unselected populations of PDAC patients could have detrimental consequences, and in particular, that there is potential for disease acceleration in cancers with an intact TGFβ/SMAD4 signaling pathway.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1

Supplementary Figure 2

Acknowledgements

AFH is supported by a HHMI Early Career Award and NCI KO8 CA122835-03. N.B. is supported by grants from NIH (NCI 2P01CA117969-06, NCI 1R01 CA133557-01, and P50CA127003), and Lynda Verville Cancer Research Foundation.

Footnotes

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: Genzyme Corp. and Stromedix Corp provided research funds and antibodies in support of these studies.

References

1. Massague J, Blain SW, Lo RS. TGFbeta signaling in growth control, cancer, and heritable disorders. Cell. 2000;103:295–309. [PubMed]
2. Ikushima H, Miyazono K. TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 10:415–424. [PubMed]
3. Izeradjene K, Combs C, Best M, Gopinathan A, Wagner A, Grady WM, et al. Kras(G12D) and Smad4/Dpc4 haploinsufficiency cooperate to induce mucinous cystic neoplasms and invasive adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:229–243. [PubMed]
4. Ijichi H, Chytil A, Gorska AE, Aakre ME, Fujitani Y, Fujitani S, et al. Aggressive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice caused by pancreas-specific blockade of transforming growth factor-beta signaling in cooperation with active Kras expression. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3147–3160. [PubMed]
5. Bardeesy N, Cheng KH, Berger JH, Chu GC, Pahler J, Olson P, et al. Smad4 is dispensable for normal pancreas development yet critical in progression and tumor biology of pancreas cancer. Genes Dev. 2006;20:3130–3146. [PubMed]
6. Vincent DF, Yan KP, Treilleux I, Gay F, Arfi V, Kaniewski B, et al. Inactivation of TIF1gamma cooperates with Kras to induce cystic tumors of the pancreas. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000575. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Nolan-Stevaux O, Lau J, Truitt ML, Chu GC, Hebrok M, Fernández-Zapico ME, et al. GLI1 is regulated through Smoothened-independent mechanisms in neoplastic pancreatic ducts and mediates PDAC cell survival and transformation. Genes Dev. 2009;23:24–36. [PubMed]
8. Horiguchi K, Shirakihara T, Nakano A, Imamura T, Miyazono K, Saitoh M. Role of Ras signaling in the induction of snail by transforming growth factor-beta. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:245–253. [PubMed]
9. Kano MR, Bae Y, Iwata C, Morishita Y, Yashiro M, Oka M, et al. Improvement of cancer-targeting therapy, using nanocarriers for intractable solid tumors by inhibition of TGF-beta signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3460–3465. [PubMed]
10. Hinz S, Pagerols-Raluy L, Oberg HH, Ammerpohl O, Grüssel S, Sipos B, et al. Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8344–8350. [PubMed]
11. Rowland-Goldsmith MA, Maruyama H, Matsuda K, Idezawa T, Ralli M, Ralli S, et al. Soluble type II transforming growth factor-beta receptor attenuates expression of metastasis-associated genes and suppresses pancreatic cancer cell metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002;1:161–167. [PubMed]
12. Melisi D, Ishiyama S, Sclabas GM, Fleming JB, Xia Q, Tortora G, et al. LY2109761, a novel transforming growth factor beta receptor type I and type II dual inhibitor, as a therapeutic approach to suppressing pancreatic cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:829–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Ueda R, Fujita M, Zhu X, Sasaki K, Kastenhuber ER, Kohanbash G, et al. Systemic inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta in glioma-bearing mice improves the therapeutic efficacy of glioma-associated antigen peptide vaccines. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6551–6559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Weinreb PH, Simon KJ, Rayhorn P, Yang WJ, Leone DR, Dolinski BM, et al. Function-blocking integrin alphavbeta6 monoclonal antibodies: distinct ligand-mimetic and nonligand-mimetic classes. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:17875–17887. [PubMed]
15. Van Aarsen LA, Leone DR, Ho S, Dolinski BM, McCoon PE, LePage DJ, et al. Antibody-mediated blockade of integrin alpha v beta 6 inhibits tumor progression in vivo by a transforming growth factor-beta-regulated mechanism. Cancer Res. 2008;68:561–570. [PubMed]
16. Hezel AF, Kimmelman AC, Stanger BZ, Bardeesy N, Depinho RA. Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1218–1249. [PubMed]
17. Singh A, Greninger P, Rhodes D, Koopman L, Violette S, Bardeesy N, et al. A gene expression signature associated with "K-Ras addiction" reveals regulators of EMT and tumor cell survival. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:489–500. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Olive KP, Jacobetz MA, Davidson CJ, Gopinathan A, McIntyre D, Honess D, et al. Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science. 2009;324:1457–1461. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Tuveson D, Hanahan D. Translational medicine: Cancer lessons from mice to humans. Nature. 471:316–317. [PubMed]
20. Ijichi H, Chytil A, Gorska AE, Aakre ME, Bierie B, Tada M, et al. Inhibiting Cxcr2 disrupts tumor-stromal interactions and improves survival in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Invest. 121:4106–4117. [PMC free article] [PubMed]