|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Conceived and designed the experiments: ZH. Performed the experiments: JY YS. Analyzed the data: NT JY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JY YS. Wrote the manuscript: YL.
Sleep duration has been shown to play an important role in the development of cancer. However, the results have been inconsistent. A meta-analysis with prospective cohort studies was performed to clarify the association between short or long sleep duration and cancer risk.
PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible publications. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random- or fixed- model.
A total of 10 prospective studies (8392 incident cases and 555678 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Neither short nor long sleep duration was statistically associated with increased risk of cancer (short sleep duration: RR=1.05, 95%CI=0.90-1.24, p=0.523; long sleep duration: RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.76-1.12, p=0.415). In the subgroup by cancer type, long sleep duration was positively associated with colorectal cancer (RR=1.29, 95%CI=1.09-1.52, p=0.003).
The present meta-analysis suggested that neither short nor long sleep duration was significantly associated with risk of cancer, although long sleep duration increased risk of with colorectal cancer. Large-scale well-design prospective studies are required to be conducted to further investigate the observed association.
Cancer is a serious public health problem worldwide. Although many risk factors, including genetic variants, obesity, intake of high-fat food, lack of physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption, contribute to development of cancer, they can account for only a small proportion of cancer cases. Thus, other unknown risk factors still need to be identified.
Melatonin, synthesized and secreted by the pineal gland in the brain, plays an important role in controlling the body’s circadian rhythm . Evidence has shown that serum melatonin concentrations are lower in habitual short sleepers (<6 h/night) than in long sleepers (>9 h/night) . Thus, sleep duration may influence melatonin levels by determining length of light exposure, thereby affecting cancer risk. Recently, several meta-analyses have indicated that both short and long sleep durations are associated with risk of obesity [3,4], hypertension [5,6], diabetes , cardiovascular disease , as well as all-cause mortality [9,10]. However, no meta-analysis has been performed to investigate the association between habitual sleep duration and cancer risk, although 10 prospective cohort studies have been conducted and the findings have been inconsistent [11–19]. The discrepancy might be due to the insufficient statistical power of individual study. In this study, therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to clarify the association between sleep duration and cancer risk.
Literature databases were searched including PubMed and Embase. The search strategy to identify all possible studies involved the use of the following key words: (sleep duration or sleep time) and (cancer or carcinoma). The reference lists of retrieved articles were hand-searched. The literature search was limited to English language. If more than one article were published using the same data, only the study with largest sample size was included. The literature search was updated on May 11, 2013.
The studies included in the meta-analysis met the following inclusion criteria: (1) evaluated the association between sleep duration and cancer risk; (2) used cohort design; (3) provided relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The following information was extracted from each study: (1) name of the first author; (2) year of publication; (3) origin of country; (4) number of incident cancer cases and total participants; (5) sex ratio and mean age of the study population; (6) duration of follow-up; (7) sleep duration category; (8) cancer type; (9) covariates used in adjustment. The two authors independently assessed the articles for compliance with the inclusion/exclusion criteria and resolved disagreements through discussion.
The association of short or long sleep duration with cancer risk was estimated by calculating pooled RR and 95% CI. The significance of pooled RR was determined by Z test (p<0.05 was considered statistically significant). A Q test was performed to examine the between-study heterogeneity. A random- (DerSimonian-Laird method ) or fixed- (Mantel-Haenszel method ) effects model was used to calculate pooled RR in the presence (p<=0.10) or absence (p>0.10) of heterogeneity, respectively. Subgroup analysis based on cancer type was conducted. Sensitivity analysis after excluding one study at a time was performed to assess the stability of the results. Publication bias was assessed by Begg’s test  and Egger’s test  (p<0.05 was considered statistically significant). Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 11 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).
The PRISMA checklist was presented as Table S1. A flow chart for exclusion/inclusion of individual articles (or studies) was presented as Figure 1. The literature search identified a total of 274 potentially relevant papers. 253 papers were excluded after reading the title and abstract because of obvious irrelevance. One paper was excluded since it examined the association between sleep duration and breast cancer OncotypeDX recurrence score. Another paper was excluded because it investigated the association between sleep duration and colorectal adenoma. In addition, four letters and two commentaries were also excluded. Thus, 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. However, four case-control studies were further excluded [24–27]. In addition, since two studies were included in the paper by Zhang et al. , they were considered as the separate studies in the following data analysis. Therefore, a total of 9 articles including 10 studies (8392 incident cases and 555678 participants) were included in the final meta-analysis [11–19]. Of them, six studies were on breast cancer, three on colorectal cancer, one on prostate cancer, one on endometrial cancer, one on thyroid cancer, and one on ovarian cancer. Sleep duration category (hours) and other characteristics of the included studies were presented in Table 1.
Short sleep duration was not statistically associated with increased risk of cancer (RR=1.05, 95%CI=0.90-1.24, p=0.523; Figure 2 and Table 2) with evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2=57.6%, p for heterogeneity=0.012). In the subgroup by cancer type, non-significant association was also found for all cancers (Table 2).
Long sleep duration was not statistically associated with increased risk of cancer (RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.76-1.12, p=0.415; Figure 3 and Table 2) with evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2=68.9%, p for heterogeneity=0.001). In the subgroup by cancer type, long sleep duration was positively associated with colorectal cancer (RR=1.29, 95%CI=1.09-1.52, p=0.003), but inversely associated with prostate cancer (RR=0.36, 95%CI=0.18-0.72, p=0.004) and ovarian cancer (RR=0.80, 95%CI=0.65-0.99, p=0.038). There was no significant association of long sleep duration with endometrial cancer and thyroid cancer (Table 2).
After excluding one study at a time, the sensitivity analysis confirmed the non-significant association between sleep duration and cancer risk (data not shown). No publication bias was detected for short sleep duration (Begg’s test: p= 0.592 and Egger’s test: p= 0.349) and long sleep duration (Begg’s test: p= 0.210 and Egger’s test: p= 0.374).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis with prospective cohort studies examining the association between sleep duration and cancer risk. The findings showed that neither short nor long sleep duration was significantly associated with cancer risk. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we found long sleep duration was positively associated with colorectal cancer, but inversely associated with prostate cancer and ovarian cancer.
To date, six studies have investigated the association between sleep duration and breast cancer and have revealed mixed results [11–13,25–27]. Three studies were cohort based [11–13] and the other three studies were case-control based [25–27]. In this meta-analysis, we did not recruit three case-control studies since they limit casual inference. The pooling of the RRs from three cohort studies did not suggest any association for either short or long sleep duration with breast cancer. In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed positive association between long sleep duration and colorectal cancer risk. This finding was based on three cohort studies including 2824 incident cases. We think the result was credible since sufficient statistical power was achieved. Regarding to the inverse association of long sleep duration with prostate cancer and ovarian cancer, we believe the result might be due to chance since only one study with small cases was included for each cancer. Thus, further cohort studies with sufficient statistical power are required to confirm or refute the findings.
In this meta-analysis, about 8,392 incident cases and 555,678 participants were included, thus, we have sufficient statistical power to draw the conclusion. In addition, all included studies were prospective cohort based, thus, the conclusion is more convincing. Also, covariates’ estimates from individual study were used to pool the results. Thus, the estimate is more exact and the conclusion is more credible. However, our study is subject to four limitations. First, all included studies measured the sleep duration using the subjective questionnaire rather than the objective actigraphy. However, self-reported sleep duration assessment is well correlated with values obtained by actigraphic monitoring . Second, the confounding variables controlled for were different between studies. Further well-designed studies with consideration of more covariates are required to examine the association between sleep duration and cancer risk. Third, we had no data on sleep quality, the presence of sleeping disorders or rotating shift work, which may influence sleep duration and the association with cancer risk. Fourth, there was significant heterogeneity between studies. Thus, meta-regression meta-analysis was performed to examine source of heterogeneity, with introduction of variables including type of cancers, number of cases, mean age of subjects and duration of follow-up. The results suggested that type of cancers was the main source of heterogeneity (p<0.05). In the subgroup analysis by type of cancers, the heterogeneity disappeared in each subgroup with the exception for the subgroup of the association between breast cancer risk and short sleep duration.
In summary, the present meta-analysis suggested that neither short nor long sleep duration was significantly associated with risk of cancer, although long sleep duration increased risk of with colorectal cancer. Large-scale well-design prospective studies are necessary to be conducted to further confirm or refute the observed association.
The authors have no support or funding to report.