PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 August 26.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3753020
NIHMSID: NIHMS494004

Hyperglycemia and prostate cancer recurrence in men treated for localized prostate cancer

Abstract

Introduction

Obesity is consistently linked with prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence and mortality although the mechanism is unknown. Impaired glucose regulation, which is common among obese individuals, has been hypothesized as a potential mechanism for PCa tumor growth. In this study we explore the relationship between serum glucose at time of treatment and risk of PCa recurrence following initial therapy.

Methods

The study group was comprised of 1,734 men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) for localized PCa between 2001–2010. Serum glucose levels closest to date of diagnosis were determined. PCa recurrence was determined based on PSA progression (nadir PSA + 2 for RT; PSA ≥ 0.2 for RP) or secondary therapy. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine whether glucose level was associated with BCR after adjusting for age, race, BMI, comorbidity, diagnosis of diabetes, Gleason Sum, PSA, treatment, and treatment year.

Results

Recurrence was identified in 16% of men over a mean follow-up period 41 months (range 1 – 121 months). Those with elevated glucose (≥ 100 mg/dL) had a 50% increased risk of recurrence (HR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.0) compared to those with a normal glucose level (< 100 mg/dL). This effect was seen in both those undergoing RP (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0–3.6) and those treated with RT (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0).

Conclusion

Glucose levels at the time of PCa diagnosis are an independent predictor of PCa recurrence for men undergoing treatment for localized disease.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Hyperglycemia, Biochemical recurrence, Veteran’s affairs

INTRODUCTION

Obesity appears to confer an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa) specific mortality.16 Considering the epidemic of obesity in the United States, understanding mechanisms between obesity and poor cancer prognosis holds great promise for improving patient outcomes. One potential link is impaired glucose regulation, which is a precursor to Type II diabetes mellitus (DM), a commonly co-occurring condition with obesity.7, 8

There are several pathways by which alterations in glucose metabolism may lead to cancer progression. Glucose is required for cancer cells for growth,9 and cancer cells are known to use more glucose than non-cancerous cells. Hyperglycemia leads to elevated insulin levels, and the activation of the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway has been implicated in PCa growth though positive effects on cellular proliferation and anti-apoptosis.10 Hyperglycemia also leads to the production of advanced glycosylated end products11 with resultant oxidative stress which can lead to DNA damage. Finally, chronic inflammation is seen with DM and the metabolic syndrome and results in release of several cytokines that can promote tumor growth.12

Although a diagnosis of DM (self-reported or by diagnosis code) has been associated with poor PCa outcomes in some studies, this finding has not been consistent.1315 These mixed findings may be due to imprecision in assessment of DM, which typically uses of a diagnostic code and does not adequately describe the severity of DM within an individual. Limited work investigated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C)14, 16 levels as more specific measures of severity of DM and glucose control. Whereas HbA1C levels are typically only obtained for patients with DM, glucose is a commonly collected test that is more widely available for analyses. Studies in breast and colon cancer have found that higher blood glucose levels are associated with a greater risk of disease progression,1719 although such studies have not been performed in PCa. We hypothesize that impaired glucose regulation, represented by higher serum glucose levels, is associated with a higher risk of recurrence after primary PCa treatment. In this study we explore the relationship between serum glucose at time of PCa diagnosis and risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) for men with localized PCa undergoing primary therapy.

METHODS

Data source

The Northwest Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN 20) electronic medical record was used to identify eligible men with PCa. VISN 20 encompasses Washington, Oregon, Alaska, Idaho, western Montana and northern California and includes 7 primary medical centers and 27 community-based outpatient clinics. VISN 20 uses a shared regional electronic medical record system and the data for this study were extracted from the VISN20 regional data warehouse, a system of relational databases that pulls nearly 100% of the information contained in the electronic medical record (including clinic appointments, inpatient stays, pharmacy records, laboratory values, pathology reports, imaging tests, and vital measures).20, 21 Institution review board approval was obtained.

Study population

We identified men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer during the years 2001 – 2010 who were treated with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) in the form of brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy. We excluded men treated with active surveillance/watchful waiting and men with distant metastases at diagnosis. We also excluded men who received primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or long-term continuous ADT as part of their primary treatment as ADT impacts glucose regulation.22 In order to ensure that complete follow-up would be likely within the VA system, we included only those men who had an established relationship with a primary care provider in VISN20 prior to diagnosis and had a previously assessed PSA value measured within the network.

Data collection and coding

The primary exposure of interest was serum glucose closest to date of diagnosis. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was coded based on provider recorded ICD9 diagnosis codes in the 12 month period prior to diagnosis. Recurrence following RP was defined as any PSA 6 months or more after surgery ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (after achieving an undetectable PSA post-RP). For RT patients, PSA recurrence was defined by nadir PSA + 2.0 ng/mL. Initiation of salvage therapy was also considered as evidence of progression (salvage RT, salvage RP or salvage ADT). Salvage RT was defined as radiation received > 1 year after primary treatment date. Several covariates were also identified from the EMR including demographic characteristics (age, race), clinical measures (body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index23 scores in the 12 month period prior to diagnosis) and tumor characteristics (year of diagnosis, Gleason score, clinical stage (available for all subjects), and pathologic stage (available for subjects treated with RP)).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics, including Chi-square tests, were conducted to compare demographic and clinical characteristics by initial treatment and by glucose level. Glucose level was analyzed using three different approaches. First, quartiles of glucose were determined and the lowest quartile served as the referent group. Second, the categories established by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for normal (< 100 mg/dL) impaired glucose (100 – 125 mg/dL) and diabetes (> 125 mg/dL) were used with the normal category serving as the referent group. Finally, a binary analysis was performed using the normal ADA glucose level as the cutoff (< 100 mg/dL vs. ≥ 100 mg/dL). All three approaches are reported. Patients who may have moved or stopped using VA care were censored at the end of the calendar year of their last visit if they had no VA utilization in the subsequent calendar year. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was performed adjusting for all covariates above (age, race, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, year of diagnosis, treatment type, Gleason score and tumor stage) included in the analysis. The proportional hazards assumption was assessed by examining the slope of the Schoenfeld residuals. Models including all patients and stratified by treatment were performed. Effect modification by treatment and by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN®) risk strata24 were evaluated with the likelihood ratio test comparing the full model (with the interaction term) to the reduced model. Two additional analyses were performed: first, excluding those with a clinical diagnosis of DM and/or a glucose level which would qualify for the diagnosis of DM by the ADA (> 125 mg/dL); and second, excluding patient with high risk disease who did not received concomitant ADT as this may impact risk of disease recurrence. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software, Version 12 (Stata, Inc., College Station, TX).

RESULTS

A total of 1,734 men were identified during the study period undergoing treatment with either RP (n = 722) or RT (n = 1,012). Table 1 presents the demographic and pathologic features of these men by disease recurrence status. As expected, pathologic factors (PSA, Gleason and stage were highly associated with recurrence. Several differences between men undergoing RP or RT were identified (data not shown). Men treated with RT were older (15% vs. 1% over age 75, p<0.001) had higher Charlson Comorbidity scores (p<0.001) and were more likely to have been diagnosed with DM prior to diagnosis (p<0.001). Men receiving RT had higher pretreatment PSA values compared to the RP group (35% ≥ 10 ng/mL vs. 19%, p<0.001). The median follow-up time was 41 months (range 1 – 121 months). Recurrence was observed in 281 men (16%). Cumulative recurrence was similar following RT (15%) and surgery (17%). Recurrence events occurred in 7%, 14% and 33% of low, intermediate and high risk cases (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN®)),24 respectively.

Table 1
Demographic and Tumor Characteristics of Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer by Disease Recurrence Status

Table 2 shows the distribution of demographic and pathologic features by different ADA glucose levels. A total of 514 (30%), 623 (36%) and 597 (34%) had glucose levels of < 100, 100–125 and > 125 mg/dL, respectively. Men in the highest glucose category were more commonly obese, with higher Charlson scores and having a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (all p < 0.001). Gleason sum scores of 7–10 were more common in the highest category of glucose (68%) compared to 57% and 59% for the lower two categories, respectively (p = 0.001). Similarly, higher clinical stage (T2b-T3) was more common in those with glucose > 125 mg/dL (23%) than those with lower glucose levels (16 and 17% respectively, p = 0.04). Surgery was more common in those with the highest glucose levels.

Table 2
Demographic and Tumor Characteristics of Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer Stratified by American Diabetes Association Serum Glucose Categories

The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for risk of recurrence by quartile of glucose level are presented in Table 3 for the entire cohort. The lowest quartile (range 31 – 98 mg/dL) served as the referent group in the multivariate analysis adjusting for age, race, BMI, diagnosis of DM, treatment type and year of treatment, stage, Gleason and Charlson Score. In the overall cohort, we observed a modest trend in increased risk (range 35 – 57%) of recurrence for each of the glucose quartiles compared to the lowest quartile, although this was not significant. There was no evidence for effect modification by treatment or NCCN risk category (both likelihood ratio test p-value > 0.6). In the RP group, all three higher quartiles had a more than 2-fold increased risk of recurrence compared to the lowest quartile, with p-values ranging from 0.01 to 0.04, data not shown). In the RT group, there were non-significant differences in risk of recurrence with higher glucose levels (range 18 – 48%). The risk of recurrence by the three ADA glucose categories is presented in Table 4 along with dichotomous ADA categories. In the entire cohort, those with an abnormal glucose (> 100mg/dL) had a 46% increased risk of recurrence (HR: 1.46: 95% CI 1.09 – 1.95). This observed risk was present in both the RP group (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.03 – 3.55) and the RT group (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.00 – 2.01). Excluding those with either a clinical diagnosis of DM or a serum glucose which would qualify for the diagnosis of DM by the ADA (> 125 mg/dL) did not change the results. In that analysis including both RP and XRT patients, having a glucose of 100–125 mg/dL was associated with a 44% increased risk of recurrence compared to those with a normal glucose level (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01 –1.97).

Table 3
Adjusted Risk of Prostate Cancer Recurrence by Quartiles of Serum Glucose
Table 4
Risk of Recurrence after Prostate Cancer Treatment by American Diabetes Association Serum Glucose Categories

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that men with elevated glucose levels at the time of PCa diagnosis have a greater risk of PCa recurrence following primary treatment compared to men with a normal glucose level. Considering the growing obesity epidemic and the consistent relationship between obesity and adverse PCa outcomes,7, 8 these findings are important in helping to identify modifiable risk factors for men undergoing treatment for newly diagnosed PCa.

Glucose and cancer outcomes have been evaluated in breast and colorectal cancer.1719, 25 In a study of 202 women with breast cancer, there was a similar increased risk of recurrence in the 2nd (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.2) and 3rd (HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.0–3.1) tertiles compared to the lowest tertile.17 In colorectal cancer, those with the highest quartile of glucose (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.1)19 or post load plasma glucose (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.4)18 had higher risk of disease-specific mortality compared to those in the lowest quartile. These studies support the role of abnormal glucose regulation and cancer outcomes.

Small studies have evaluated serum biomarkers of glucose regulation and PCa. In a study of 89 men with DM treated with RP, a higher HbA1C pre-operatively was associated with the risk of extracapsular disease (pT3) and higher Gleason grade (≥ 7).26 In another study of 247 men undergoing RP, HbA1C levels pre-operatively were associated with higher Gleason grade (p = 0.001).16 Higher HbA1C levels were associated with a non-significant risk of recurrence: compared to those with HbA1C < 6.3, the HR for men with HbA1C of 6.3–7.7 and ≥ 7.8 was 1.5 (95% CI 0.8–2.6) and 1.3 (0.7–2.4), respectively.16 Both of these studies are limited by their small size and only including men with DM. Studies have found associations between insulin levels and PCa-specific mortality.1, 27 In one study, a higher mean fasting insulin level at diagnosis was found in those who died of PCa.27 In a second study, levels of C-peptide (an insulin surrogate) were determined from PCa cases from the Physicians Health Study.1 Those in the highest C-peptide quartile had a more than 2-fold increased risk of PCSM (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.3 – 4.3) compared to those in the lowest C-peptide quartile. We do not have insulin or C-peptide levels available in our study and thus rely on serum glucose levels as an indicator of an individual’s glucose regulation.

The present analysis is the first to specifically evaluate glucose levels and outcomes in men with PCa. We found that men with an elevated glucose at the time of PCa diagnosis had an almost 50% increased risk of PCa recurrence even after adjusting for clinical and pathologic factors. Whether it is hyperglycemia, or subsequent elevated levels of insulin/IGF, which affect tumor recurrence cannot be determined from this study. Studies have not found a significant relationship between the diagnosis of DM (self-reported or diagnosis code)1315 and PCa recurrence, but the diagnosis of DM may not reflect an individual’s current glycemic control. This could lead to misclassification as men with well controlled DM may have glucose and insulin levels similar to men without DM and vice-versa. Thus, using a serum biomarker is more sensitive for accurately determining the relationship between glucose regulation and disease outcomes. Our analysis is also unique in that we include both surgical and radiation patients. Although the magnitude of influence with hyperglycemia on recurrence is less in the XRT group, the direction of the effect is the same and there was no evidence for effect modification by treatment. Potential reasons for this attenuation include regression to the mean, differences in BCR definitions, unmeasured confounding and the concomitant use of ADT in the radiation group alone.

There are limitations to our study. We only use a single glucose measurement which may not reflect an individual’s ongoing glucose regulation during their post-treatment time. A hemoglobin A1C measurement does represent one’s recent glucose regulation, however such values were only available in those with DM, and similar to the pre-operative glucose level, will not necessarily reflect subsequent glucose regulation. Further, we cannot be certain that these glucose levels were drawn fasting, however the median glucose for men without the diagnosis of DM was 107 (interquartile range 96 – 126). Data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Diabetes Fact Sheet 2011, state that 35% of adults over aged 20 (and 50% of adults over the age of 65) had prediabetes based on fasting glucose levels.28 Thus our data, in which 72% of the patients are over age 60 years and 82% of patients are overweight or obese, are consistent with this distribution. Our population reflects Veterans who are consistent users of VA care and may not be generalizable to other men. Because the VA is an open system, some men may go to non-VA providers for follow-up care which may not get reported back to the VA. This appears to happen infrequently, a prior study of men with elevated PSA tests, 8% of men received subsequent care outside of the VA, 29 and we specifically restricted our cohort to men who had an established primary care relationship prior to diagnosis to help reduce this potential limitation. Our definitions of biochemical recurrence may misclassify some men as not having evidence of recurrence and we cannot rule out Type 1 error in this analysis. We also do not include medication usage for treatment of DM which may impact glucose levels and we cannot rule out additional sources of unmeasured confounding. Future study of medication usage for DM may be informative. Finally, recurrence after PCa is a heterogeneous event with many individuals not progressing to PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). Although PCSM is a more robust endpoint, we did not have enough events to study this relationship. Use of national VA data in the future may allow such an analysis.

In conclusion, men with an elevated glucose level at the time of treatment for localized PCa have a higher risk of recurrence than men with a normal glucose level. This analysis provides evidence that disease progression may be influenced by glucose, suggesting that glucose control could be a modifiable risk factor for PCa recurrence and progression.

Acknowledgments

NIH Grants: P50CA097186 from the National Cancer Institute; with additional support from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

This material is the result of work supported by resources from the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.

References

1. Ma J, Li H, Giovannucci E, et al. Prediagnostic body-mass index, plasma C-peptide concentration, and prostate cancer-specific mortality in men with prostate cancer: a long-term survival analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(11):1039–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1625–38. [PubMed]
3. Andersson SO, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, et al. Body size and prostate cancer: a 20-year follow-up study among 135006 Swedish construction workers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(5):385–9. [PubMed]
4. Wright ME, Chang SC, Schatzkin A, et al. Prospective study of adiposity and weight change in relation to prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer. 2007;109(4):675–84. [PubMed]
5. Efstathiou JA, Bae K, Shipley WU, et al. Obesity and mortality in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: analysis of RTOG 85–31. Cancer. 2007;110(12):2691–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Gong Z, Agalliu I, Lin DW, Stanford JL, Kristal AR. Obesity is associated with increased risks of prostate cancer metastasis and death after initial cancer diagnosis in middle-aged men. Cancer. 2007;109(6):1192–202. [PubMed]
7. What are the risk factors for prostate cancer? American Cancer Society, Inc; [Accessed June 26, 2012]. http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/ProstateCancer/DetailedGuide/prostate-cancer-risk-factors.
8. Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, Kumar NB. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71(9):985–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Osborne CK, Bolan G, Monaco ME, Lippman ME. Hormone responsive human breast cancer in long-term tissue culture: effect of insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(12):4536–40. [PubMed]
10. Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(12):915–28. [PubMed]
11. Shinohara M, Thornalley PJ, Giardino I, et al. Overexpression of glyoxalase-I in bovine endothelial cells inhibits intracellular advanced glycation endproduct formation and prevents hyperglycemia-induced increases in macromolecular endocytosis. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(5):1142–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. DeNardo DG, Andreu P, Coussens LM. Interactions between lymphocytes and myeloid cells regulate pro- versus anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010;29(2):309–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Chan JM, Latini DM, Cowan J, Duchane J, Carroll PR. History of diabetes, clinical features of prostate cancer, and prostate cancer recurrence-data from CaPSURE (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(7):789–97. [PubMed]
14. Jayachandran J, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, et al. Diabetes and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: are results affected by obesity and race? Results from the shared equal-access regional cancer hospital database. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(1):9–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Smith MR, Bae K, Efstathiou JA, et al. Diabetes and mortality in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: RTOG 92-02. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(26):4333–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Kim HS, Presti JC, Jr, Aronson WJ, et al. Glycemic control and prostate cancer progression: results from the SEARCH database. Prostate. 2010;70(14):1540–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Barba M, Sperati F, Stranges S, et al. Fasting glucose and treatment outcome in breast and colorectal cancer patients treated with targeted agents: results from a historic cohort. Ann Oncol. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Colangelo LA, Gapstur SM, Gann PH, Dyer AR, Liu K. Colorectal cancer mortality and factors related to the insulin resistance syndrome. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(4):385–91. [PubMed]
19. Trevisan M, Liu J, Muti P, Misciagna G, Menotti A, Fucci F. Markers of insulin resistance and colorectal cancer mortality. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10(9):937–41. [PubMed]
20. Maynard C, Chapko MK. Data resources in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Diabetes Care. 2004;27 (Suppl 2):B22–6. [PubMed]
21. Zeliadt SB, Sekaran NK, Hu EY, et al. Comparison of demographic characteristics, surgical resection patterns, and survival outcomes for veterans and nonveterans with non-small cell lung cancer in the Pacific Northwest. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(10):1726–32. [PubMed]
22. Basaria S, Muller DC, Carducci MA, Egan J, Dobs AS. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in men with prostate carcinoma who receive androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer. 2006;106(3):581–8. [PubMed]
23. Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM, Schrag D. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(8):584–90. [PubMed]
24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. [Accessed Date May 2012];Prostate Cancer (Version 3.2012) URL http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
25. Flood A, Mai V, Pfeiffer R, et al. Elevated serum concentrations of insulin and glucose increase risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(5):1423–9. [PubMed]
26. Hong SK, Lee ST, Kim SS, et al. Significance of preoperative HbA1c level in patients with diabetes mellitus and clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate. 2009;69(8):820–6. [PubMed]
27. Hammarsten J, Hogstedt B. Hyperinsulinaemia: a prospective risk factor for lethal clinical prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(18):2887–95. [PubMed]
28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
29. Zeliadt SB, Hoffman RM, Etzioni R, Ginger VA, Lin DW. What happens after an elevated PSA test: the experience of 13,591 veterans. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1205–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]