Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of viroljBioMed CentralBiomed Central Web Sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleVirology JournalJournal Front Page
Virol J. 2013; 10: 257.
Published online 2013 August 12. doi:  10.1186/1743-422X-10-257
PMCID: PMC3751248

Isolation of midgut escape mutants of two American genotype dengue 2 viruses from Aedes aegypti



Several studies have shown that American genotype dengue 2 viruses (DENV2) have reduced viral fitness in the mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti, compared to other DENV2 genotypes. Diminished replication efficiency or inability to efficiently traverse membrane barriers encompassing organs such as the midgut or salivary glands are considered major factors negatively impacting viral fitness in the mosquito.


We analyzed the vector competence of Ae. aegypti for two American DENV2 strains, QR94 and PR159 originating from Mexico and Puerto-Rico, respectively. Both strains infected mosquito midguts following acquisition of infectious bloodmeals. However, DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 poorly disseminated from the midgut at 7 or 14 days post-bloodmeal (pbm). We detected one virus isolate, EM33, among 31 DENV2-QR94 infected mosquitoes, and one isolate, EM41, among 121 DENV2-PR159 infected mosquitoes, generating high virus titers in mosquito carcasses at 7 days pbm. In oral challenge experiments, EM33 and EM41 showed midgut dissemination rates of 40-50%. Replication efficiency of EM41 in secondary mosquito tissue was similar to that of a dissemination-competent control strain, whereas the replication efficiency of EM33 was significantly lower than that of the control virus. The genome sequence of DENV2-QR94 encoded seven unique amino acids (aa), which were not found in 100 of the most closely related DENV2 strains. EM33 had one additional aa change, E202K, in the E protein. DENV2-PR159 encoded four unique aa residues, one of them E202K, whereas EM41 had two additional aa substitutions, Q77E in the E protein and E93D in NS3.


Our results indicate that the midgut of Ae. aegypti acts as a selective sieve for DENV2 in which genetically distinct, dissemination-competent virus variants are rapidly selected from the viral quasispecies to be transmitted to vertebrates.

Keywords: Dengue virus type 2, American genotype, Aedes aegypti, Midgut escape mutant, Amino acid substitution


Dengue is world-wide the most important arthropod-borne viral disease, infecting an estimated 50 million people annually, of which around 500,000 develop severe hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome [1]. The estimated mortality amounts to ~20,000 cases per annum [2]. The four serotypes of dengue virus (Flaviviridae; Flavivirus; dengue virus type 1–4 [DENV1-4]) are transmitted primarily by the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti[3]. Urban dengue circulates exclusively between mosquitoes and humans without the need of another (animal) amplification host. Infected humans typically develop high viremia, which enables mosquitoes to readily acquire the virus from their hosts for further transmission.

Following acquisition of an infectious bloodmeal, DENV particles enter the midgut lumen [4]. Viruses that are in close proximity to the epithelial cell lining of the midgut invade the epithelial cells and start replicating in those cells. After four to seven days of replication, the virus starts to disseminate from the midgut epithelial cells to secondary tissue such as nerve tissue, hemocytes, fat body, reproductive tissue, and eventually the salivary glands [4-6]. Once the salivary glands are infected and DENV particles are released into the saliva ducts, the mosquito is able to transmit the virus to a new host. In a number of studies it has been shown that the mosquito midgut is a critical organ determining vector competence for DENV [7,8]. The virus can encounter a midgut infection barrier (MIB), which restricts its ability to invade the epithelial cells for replication [9]. Another major barrier that has been investigated is the midgut escape barrier (MEB) [10,11]. In this case the virus is unable to efficiently disseminate from the midgut following efficient replication in the epithelial cells. The molecular nature of MIB and MEB is still unknown [7,8,12]. Receptor recognition has been suggested to play a role in overcoming MIB for DENV and for Sindbis virus (Togaviridae; Alphavirus) [7,13,14]. Furthermore, several genomic regions underlying phenotypic variation in midgut infection and midgut escape of DENV2 were revealed by mapping of quantitative trait loci in different Ae. aegypti crosses [10,15,16]. Currently, a major research effort aims at identifying the nature of MEB for arboviruses in Ae. aegypti by investigating a novel signal transduction pathway that involves a fibroblast growth factor homologue and proteases [17]. Until the advent of highly virulent American-Asian genotype DENV2 in Cuba in 1981, American genotype DENV2 was the predominant genotype of this serotype in the Caribbean, and in Central- and South-America [18]. American genotype DENV2s are generally associated with classical dengue fever (DF) in humans. In contrast, American-Asian genotype DENV2s cause DF but are also associated with a more severe disease outcome, dengue hemorrhagic fever. Interestingly, others have shown that American genotype DENV2 strains are less efficiently transmitted by Ae. aegypti than DENV2 strains from Southeast-Asia [19,20]. Less efficient vector transmission of American genotype DENV2 strains has been associated with less efficient dissemination from the mosquito midgut to secondary tissues [19,21]. The DENV2-QR94 strain used in this study was isolated in 1994 from a patient in Quintana Roo, Mexico [22,23]. DENV2-PR159 was isolated in 1969 from a patient in Puerto-Rico and later on cultivated in vitro as a vaccine candidate [24]. In this study, we show that DENV2-QR94 and PR159 dissemination from the mosquito midgut is inhibited in the laboratory–adapted Higgs White Eye (HWE) strain of Ae. aegypti. Due to a low fidelity replication mechanism depending on the virus-encoded RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), DENV populations as well as any other RNA virus populations are generally complex and comprise of a cloud of related genomes, or quasispecies within an infected individual [25]. This quasispecies diversity is important for pathogenesis and adaptation.

Here we isolate midgut escape mutants of DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 from the viral quasispecies that efficiently overcome the MEB and identify additional amino acid (aa) changes in the genomes of the viral escape mutants that potentially account for their efficient dissemination from the mosquito midgut. Our results demonstrate that the midgut barrier in the mosquito is shaping the quasispecies of DENV2 during the infection process. We show for the first time that the mosquito midgut is a selective sieve for DENV2 in which dissemination-competent viruses are rapidly selected from the viral quasispecies.


Phylogenetic characterization of DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159

The PR159 and QR94 strains have been assigned to the American genotype (genotype V) of DENV2 based on 240 bp nucleotide sequences from their E/NS1 gene region [26,27]. Both viruses also had the N390D aa substitution in their E proteins, which is characteristic for American genotype DENV2 [28]. A phylogenetic analysis of DENV2 strains designated as American genotype strains in NCBI GenBank data base showed that the viruses, which were isolated between 1969 and 1998, formed three major clusters. One cluster contained all American genotype strains isolated between 1971 and 1974 in Polynesia/Melanesia (Additional file 1). The second cluster comprised of American genotype strains collected in Puerto-Rico between 1969 and 1977, including PR159. Finally, a third cluster contained American genotype DENV2 strains, which were collected between 1983 and 1998 in Central and South America and included QR94. DENV2-PR159 showed the closest relationship to PR_V3367. Both viruses were isolated in Puerto-Rico in 1969. DENV2-QR94 showed the closest relationship to MX_V3356 isolated in Mexico in 1992.

American genotype DENV2-QR94 has significantly lower midgut infection and dissemination efficiencies in D2S3 and Chetumal strains of Ae. aegypti

In an initial experiment, we challenged Ae. aegypti mosquitoes of the highly DENV2-competent D2S3 and Chetumal strains with DENV2-QR94. The well-characterized laboratory strain DENV2-Jam1409 was used as a control for comparison. At 14 days pbm, DENV2-QR94 generated midgut infection rates in Chetumal and D2S3 mosquitoes that were significantly lower (70%, p = 0.0019) than those generated by DENV2-Jam1409 (Table  1, Figure  1). Similarly, DENV2-QR94 disseminated from the midguts of both mosquito strains significantly less efficient than the DENV2-Jam1409 control. Mean DENV2-QR94 titers were also significantly lower in midguts and carcasses of both mosquito strains (50–140 pfu/ml for D2S3; 89–120 pfu/ml for Chetumal; p-values: 0.0001-0.0013) than mean titers of the DENV2-Jam1409 control (2.1×103-5.2×104 pfu/ml). No significant difference was observed when comparing mean DENV2-QR94 titers between midguts and carcasses of either mosquito strain. The same observation was made when both mosquito strains were infected with DENV2-Jam1409. Previously, Salazar and colleagues described diminished dissemination rates for DENV2-QR94 in Chetumal mosquitoes when analyzed by immuno-fluorescence assays [21]. Our quantitative assay revealed that not only the midgut dissemination rate of the virus but also its midgut infection rate was significantly reduced in Chetumal and D2S3 mosquitoes.

Table 1
Midgut infection and midgut escape rates of DENV2 strains/isolates QR94, PR159, EM33, EM41, and Jam1409 inAedes aegyptistrains D2S3, Chetumal, or HWE at 14 days pbm
Figure 1
Oral challenge experiment ofAe. aegypti‘D2S3’ and ‘Chetumal’ with DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-Jam1409. One week post-emergence females of the D2S3 strain (Dengue2 Susceptible on 3 chromosomes strain based on an Ae. aegypti ssp. ...

Midgut dissemination of DENV2-QR94 and PR159 is inhibited in the HWE strain of Ae. aegypti

After oral acquisition by the laboratory adapted HWE mosquitoes, DENV2-PR159 inefficiently disseminated from the mosquito midgut at 7 or 14 days pbm as determined by plaque assays (Table  1, Figures  2 and and3A).3A). Four out of 121 mosquitoes had disseminated infections at 7 days pbm (Figure  2) and only one disseminated infection (out of 30) was detectable in another independent experiment at 14 days pbm (Figure  3A). Midgut infection rate and mean titer in midgut tissue were significantly lower for DENV2-PR159 (13%, p < 0.0001; 280 pfu/ml; p < 0.0001) when compared to the DENV2-Jam1409 control (Table  1, Figure  3A).

Figure 2
Isolation of DENV2-PR159 derived viral escape mutant EM41 and of DENV2-QR94 derived EM33. One week post-emergence, females of the laboratory adapted Higgs White Eye (HWE) strain received artificial bloodmeals containing ~107 pfu/ml DENV2-QR94 (American ...
Figure 3
Oral challenge ofAe. aegypti(HWE strain) with DENV2 strains and midgut escape isolates. One week post-emergence, females of the laboratory adapted Higgs White Eye (HWE) strain received artificial bloodmeals containing (A) DENV2-PR159 (American genotype ...

Only a single disseminated infection was detectable in HWE mosquitoes at 7 days pbm and none at 14 days pbm when orally infected with DENV2-QR94 (Table  1, Figures  2 and and3B).3B). Thus, in the HWE strain of Ae. aegypti but not in the highly DENV2 competent D2S3 and Chetumal mosquitoes (Figure  1), DENV2-QR94 dissemination was almost completely inhibited. Similar to DENV2-PR159, midgut infection rate and mean midgut virus titer were significantly lower for the QR94 strain (56%, p = 0.0292; 130 pfu/ml; p < 0.0001) in comparison to DENV2-Jam1409 (Table  1, Figures  3A and and33B).

Isolation of viral midgut escape mutants derived from DENV2-QR94 and PR159

Following oral challenge of HWE mosquitoes with either DENV2-QR94 or DENV2-PR159, we detected high virus titers in two mosquito carcasses at 7 days pbm by plaque assays (Figure  2). We identified one isolate, EM41, from a carcass of a DENV2-PR159 infected mosquito (out of 121 mosquitoes tested), which had a relatively high virus titer (1.3×104 pfu/ml). We also identified an isolate from a carcass of a DENV2-QR94 infected mosquito (out of 31 mosquitoes tested), EM33, which had a virus titer of 1.3×103 pfu/ml. C6/36 cells were infected with virus suspensions of each of the two original carcass samples to amplify the midgut escape mutants by a single passage in cell culture. This ensured that sufficient virus stock was available for the following mosquito challenge and genome sequencing experiments.

EM41 and EM33 are dissemination-competent variants of their parental DENV2 strains

To three groups of HWE mosquitoes we fed infectious bloodmeals containing DENV2-PR159, EM41, or the American-Asian genotype DENV2-Jam1409 as control and to another three groups we fed bloodmeals containing DENV2-QR94, EM33, or DENV2-Jam1409 (Figures  3A and and3B).3B). In orally challenged HWE mosquitoes, the viral escape mutant EM41 generated mean virus titers in midguts (2.0×104 pfu/ml) and in carcasses (2.9×104 pfu/ml) at 14 days pbm, which were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than those of the parental DENV2-PR159 (Figure  3A). Midgut infection (60%) and dissemination rates (50%) were also significantly (p < 0.0001) increased for EM41 when compared to DENV2-PR159 (Table  1). However, the midgut infection rate of EM41 was still significantly lower (p = 0.0011) than that of the DENV2-Jam1409 control (97%), whereas the midgut dissemination rates did not differ significantly between the two viruses.

The DENV2-QR94 derived escape variant EM33 generated a midgut dissemination rate of 40% in HWE at 14 days pbm. In contrast, the parental DENV2-QR94 was not able to disseminate from the midgut (Table  1, Figure  3B). The EM33 midgut infection (34%, p = 0.0006) and dissemination rates (40%, p = 0.004) were still significantly lower than those observed for DENV2-Jam1409. Likewise, mean EM33 titers in midguts (55 pfu/ml, p < 0.0001) and carcasses (16 pfu/ml, p = 0.0006) were significantly lower in comparison to the mean titers generated by the Jam1409 control. Taken together, our data show that EM41 and EM33 are dissemination-competent variants of their parental virus strains, DENV2-PR159 and DENV2-QR94, respectively.

DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 have different replication efficiencies in mosquito tissue following intrathoracic injection

We intrathoracically injected DENV2-QR94, PR159 and their midgut escape mutants EM33 and EM41, respectively into the HWE strain of Ae. aegypti to assess whether the viruses had similar replication efficiencies in mosquito tissue outside the midgut. Following intrathoracic injection of DENV2-PR159, its replication efficiency in mosquito carcasses (and midguts) was similar to that of EM41 and DENV2-Jam1409 (Figure  4A). In contrast, mosquitoes intrathoracically injected with DENV2-QR94 produced a significantly lower mean virus titer (1.1x102 pfu/ml; p < 0.0001) in carcasses of HWE than mosquitoes injected with EM33 or the DENV2-Jam1409 control (Figure  4B). Following injection into the mosquito thorax, the QR94 strain invaded midgut tissue with a significantly lower efficiency (18%; p < 0.0001) than either EM33 or DENV2-Jam1409. These data indicate that the inability of DENV2-PR159 to productively infect the mosquito was caused by the virus’ inability to overcome the MEB rather than poor replication efficiency. In contrast, DENV2-QR94 not only was confronted with a strong MEB in Ae. aegypti but also had a significantly lower replication efficiency in secondary tissue outside the midgut.

Figure 4
Intrathoracic injection of DENV2 strains and midgut escape isolates into HWE mosquitoes.(A) Intrathoracic injection of DENV2-PR159 (American genotype DENV2 from Puerto-Rico), EM41 (midgut escape mutant derived from the PR159 strain), and DENV2-Jam1409 ...

Unique amino acid substitutions in the genomes of the dissemination incompetent DENV2 strains QR94 and PR159

DENV2-QR94 and its closest relative, Mexican strain MX_V3356 (Additional file 1), differed from each other in 24 aa residues. DENV2-PR159 and its close relative PR_V3367 differed from each other in five aa residues. DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 diverged at 26 aa positions. The QR94 strain had seven aa residues and the PR159 strain had four aa residues that were not found in 100 of the most closely related DENV2 isolates listed in NCBI GenBank based on BLAST searches (Table  2). In DENV2-QR94, two of the seven unique aa changes were present in structural proteins, E89G in prM and T55S in domain II of E. Other unique aa changes occurred in NS1, NS2a, the helicase domain of NS3 (ranging from aa position 179–618), the methyltransferase domain of NS5 (aa position 1–272) and the finger domain of the RdRP of NS5 (aa position 273–511). DENV2-PR159 had a unique aa change in domain II of E, which was E202K. The other three unique aa changes occurred in NS1, NS2a, and the thumb domain (aa position 627–900) of the RdRP of NS5.

Table 2
Unique amino acid changes in American genotype DENV2 (parental strains QR94 and PR159, PR159-derived midgut escape isolate EM41 and QR94-derived midgut escape isolate EM33) based on BLAST searches in NCBI GenBank

Amino acid substitutions in the genomes of EM33 and EM41 associated with efficient midgut dissemination phenotypes

All aa substitutions in the structural proteins of the escape mutants EM33 and EM41 resulted in a change of charge (Table  2). Escape mutant EM33 had a single additional aa substitution from negative to positive charge, E202K. Residue 202 is located within domain II of the E protein, which allows protein dimerization and contains the fusion peptide. DENV2-PR159 had the identical E202K aa change in its E protein even though the virus was unable to disseminate from the mosquito midgut. The PR159-derived escape mutant EM41 had two compensatory aa substitutions, E93D in NS3 and Q77E in domain II of the E protein in close proximity (21 aa) to the fusion peptide. Q77E resulted in an aa change from positive to negative charge. The E93D aa substitution was located in the protease domain of NS3 and also resulted in a change of charge from negative to positive polarity.


Apart from causing reduced virulence levels in the vertebrate host, American genotype DENV2 strains have been reported to be less efficiently transmitted by Ae. aegypti[19,20,29,30]. Specifically, Armstrong and Rico-Hesse (2003) reported that six American genotype DENV2 strains isolated from Trinidad, Venezuela, Mexico, and Peru poorly disseminated from midguts of two different Ae. aegypti strains when compared to dissemination rates of nine DENV2 strains from Southeast-Asia [19]. None of the six American genotype DENV2 strains used in their study contained the unique aa substitutions described in DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 [29]. Others have speculated that American genotypes have lower efficiency in formation of replicative intermediates than viruses from Southeast-Asia, which leads to lower fitness levels of American genotype viruses in mosquitoes and vertebrate hosts [30]. This could be the case for DENV2-QR94, which showed reduced replication efficiencies in midgut tissue following oral acquisition and in secondary tissue following intrathoracic injection. Intrathoracically injected DENV2-PR159, however, generated a mean virus titer in HWE mosquitoes that was comparable to that of American-Asian genotype DENV2-Jam1409. Immuno-fluorescence studies suggested earlier that DENV2-QR94 poorly disseminated from midguts of Chetumal mosquitoes at 4–7 days pbm by generating significantly fewer head tissue infections than American-Asian genotype DENV2 strains [21]. Here, we show diminished dissemination of DENV2-QR94 from midguts of Chetumal mosquitoes as well as from midguts of two other DENV2-competent mosquito strains, D2S3 and HWE. Similar observations were made when assessing the vector competence of Ae. aegypti (strain HWE) for American genotype DENV2-PR159. Our study demonstrates that the mosquito midgut is a selective sieve for DENV2 from which we could readily select dissemination-competent virus variants. We isolated from mosquitoes two viral midgut escape mutants, EM33 derived from DENV2-QR94 and EM41 of DENV2-PR159 that efficiently disseminated from the midgut.

The low-passage DENV2-QR94 virus had seven aa changes that have not been found in other wild-type DENV2 previously sequenced. Two of those aa changes occurred in structural proteins, E89G in prM and T55S in E. prM acts as a chaperone for E during virion assembly and maturation by preventing E from undergoing premature conformational changes during excretion through the trans-Golgi network at low pH [31]. The E89G aa mutation in prM leads to a change of charge at position X of the four residue furin cleavage site R-X-K/R-R [32]. Furin cleavage occurs late during virion maturation and is involved in E rearrangement and overall virus infectivity. Thus, the E89G mutation may impact efficient furin cleavage of prM. Interestingly, Kelly and colleagues observed an E89G mutation in prM after 30 serial passages of the attenuated DENV2 S16803 Thailand vaccine strain in primary dog kidney cells [32]. The midgut escape mutant EM33 had one additional aa substitution, E202K in the viral E protein, resulting in a change of charge from negative to positive polarity. The 202 residue is located within the fg loop, which is part of the hinge region connecting E domain I with domain II [33]. An aa substitution at this position is assumed to affect virus pathogenicity [32]. The E202K mutation in E has also been reported in DENV2-S16803 after 10 serial passages in primary dog kidney cells [32]. Importantly, the high passage DENV2-PR159 strain had the identical E202K mutation seen in EM33, although the lysine in this position in DENV2-PR159 E protein did not lead to virus dissemination from the midgut as observed for EM33.

Two aa changes in EM41 were associated with dissemination from the midgut, Q77E and E93D. Q77E leads to a charge change in a residue of domain II of the E protein, 21 residues upstream of the fusion peptide. The negative charge change of Q77E may have compensated for the positive charge change of E202K in the PR159 strain. The other aa substitution, E93D, occurred in the proteinase encoding domain of NS3. Both Q77E and E93D have not been described before in DENV2. Based on the observations made by Kelly and colleagues, it may be possible that aa substitutions E89G in DENV2-QR94 and E202K in the PR159 strain are a result of virus passage in cell culture and might not have been present in the genome sequences of the original virus samples that had been collected from infected patients [32].

Recently, we have shown that transgene-mediated suppression of the antiviral RNA interference pathway (RNAi) in Ae. aegypti significantly increased mean DENV2-QR94 titers in midguts but did not lead to increased dissemination efficiency [34]. Thus, the inability of DENV2-QR94 to disseminate from the mosquito midgut did not depend on the RNAi response of the mosquito. However, at this point it cannot be excluded that other innate immune pathways of the mosquito may contribute to the defect in dissemination of QR94 [35,36]. Furthermore, we speculate that the single aa substitutions in prM (E89G) and E (E202K) negatively affect the ability of DENV2 virions to attach to recognition sites at the midgut basal lamina that would enable the virions to traverse this barrier. Alternatively, the mutations could hamper efficient virion maturation and/or conformational changes of virion surface structures that prevent the virus from escaping from the midgut. DENV2-QR94 not only failed to efficiently disseminate from the mosquito midgut but also produced significantly lower mean virus titers in midguts and secondary tissue in comparison to DENV2-PR159 or the DENV2-Jam1409 control, implying that the overall replication potential of the virus was diminished. Since DENV2-QR94 also had two unique aa substitutions in the polymerase encoding NS5, it is possible that these residues accounted for the reduced replication efficiency of the virus. However, it will be important to confirm our observations concerning aa substitutions affecting midgut escape of DENV2 by mutational analysis using an American genotype DENV2-derived infectious cDNA clone.

Previously, it was suggested that point mutations in the 3′UTR of American genotype DENV2 strain QR94 might contribute to its reduced midgut dissemination and replication efficiency [21]. The 3′UTRs (453 nt) of DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 vary in five nucleotide positions (Additional file 2). When compared to the 3′UTR of American-Asian genotype DENV2-Jam1409, the variation amounts to 26 positions including a nine nucleotide insertion. However, DENV2-PR159 and EM41 have identical 3′UTR nucleotide sequences and the 3′UTR of DENV2-QR94 and EM33 differ in a single nucleotide. Thus, mutations in the 3′UTR may not be seen as a likely cause for the poor midgut dissemination efficiency of the parental viruses.


We have shown that two American genotype DENV2 strains, QR94 and PR159 are inhibited in their ability to disseminate from the midgut of Ae. aegypti, which led to the selection of two midgut escape mutants of the viruses, EM33 and EM41 from the viral quasispecies. This study identified dissemination-deficient DENV2 strains and dissemination-competent escape mutants. Both viral escape mutants had (charge-changing) aa changes in structural proteins and/or in NS3. The generation of the escape mutants occurred after a single passage in the mosquito, indicating that the midgut of Ae. aegypti acts as a selective sieve for DENV2 in which genetically distinct, dissemination-competent virus variants are rapidly selected from the viral quasispecies to be transmitted to vertebrates. The escape mutants EM33 and EM41 and the parental strains DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159, respectively, are potentially important viruses for defining arbovirus midgut escape mechanisms in Ae. aegypti.



Ae. aegypti strains of this study were the Chetumal strain of the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico [37], the D2S3 (Dengue2 Susceptible on 3 chromosomes) strain, which is based on an Ae. aegypti ssp. aegypti (San Juan, Puerto Rico) x Ae. aegypti ssp. formosus (Ibo, Nigeria) hybrid [15], and the RexD (Puerto Rico)-derived Higgs White Eye (HWE) strain, which is frequently used for germline transformation experiments [38,39]. The Chetumal and D2S3 mosquito strains are highly DENV2 competent. Mosquitoes of all three strains were reared under identical conditions (28°C temperature, 78% humidity, 12 h light/12 h dark cycle) in a BSL2 insectary. For colony maintenance, mosquitoes received artificial bloodmeals consisting of citrated sheep blood.


DENV2-PR159 was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USA). The virus, originally isolated in 1969, has an unknown (high) passage history in C6/36 Ae. albopictus cells. Virus stocks for mosquito challenge experiments had titers of 6.8×106 pfu/ml. The QR94 strain of DENV2 was isolated in 1994 from a patient in Quintana Roo, Mexico [22,23]. Since its isolation, the virus has been passed 4× in C6/36 cells [21]. The original virus stock had a titer of 7×105 pfu/ml. The American-Asian genotype DENV2-Jam1409 is derived from a full-length infectious cDNA clone [40]. Stocks of the virus were generated in C6/36 cells and had titers ranging from of 1×106-2×107 pfu/ml. Virus stocks of midgut escape mutants were generated by a single passage of sterile-filtered mosquito carcass suspensions in C6/36 cells at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 0.01. Twelve to 14 days post-infection, cells and medium were collected and used as virus stocks for mosquito challenge experiments and cDNA sequencing.

Phylogenetic analysis of American genotype DENV2 strains

DENV2 strains included in the phylogenetic analysis have the following NCBI GenBank accession numbers: D2/PF/UH50/1972 (HM582108.1), D2/PF/UH57/1971 (HM582109), D2/FJ/UH21/1971 (HM582099), D2/FJ/UH22/1971 (HM582101.1), D2/FJ/UH40/1971 (HM582100.1), D2/NC/UH37/1971 (HM582102.1), D2/NC/UH97/1972 (HM582103.1), D2/TO/UH00/1973 (HM582110), D2/TO/UH04/1974 (HM582117), D2/TO/UH16/1974 (HM582111), D2/TO/UH19/1974 (HM582112), D2/TO/UH39/1974 (HM582114), D2/TO/UH44/1974 (HM582115), D2/TO/UH94/1974 (HM582116.1), D2/AS/UH77/1972 (HM582104), D2/AS/UH79/1972 (HM582105), D2/AS/UH85/1972 (HM582106), DENV-2/PR/BID-V3367/1969 (GQ868600), Dengue virus type 2 isolate 1328 (EU056812), DENV-2/MX/BID-V3354/1983 (GQ868588), DENV-2/VE/BID-V3366/1987 (GQ868599), DENV-2/HN/BID-V2945/1984 (FJ898449), DENV-2/MX/BID-V3356/1992 (GQ868590), Dengue virus type 2 isolate IQT-1950 (EU056811), Dengue virus type 2 strain IQT2913 (AF100468.1), Dengue virus type 2 strain IQT1797 (AF100467), Dengue virus type 2 Jamaica/N.1409 (M20558). Full-length nucleotide sequences of DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159 are available at NCBI GenBank under accession numbers JX966379 and JX966380, respectively. Nucleotide sequences were automatically aligned with ClustalW in MEGA5 [41] and manually inspected in MEGA5. The phylogeny was inferred under maximum likelihood in MEGA5 using the Tamura-Nei model [42]. Bootstrapping was conducted in MEGA5 with 1000 replicates.

Oral virus challenge experiments and intrathoracic virus injections into mosquitoes

Virus challenge experiments with mosquitoes were performed as described before [38,43]. Briefly, DENV2 stocks (Jam1409, PR159, QR94, EM33, EM41) were cultivated in Ae. albopictus (C6/36) cells by infecting cells at 0.01 multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.), changing the culture medium at 6 days post-infection and maintaining the cells until 12–14 days post-infection. One-week-old females of the HWE, D2S3, or Chetumal strains received artificial, DENV2 containing bloodmeals, which consisted of 50% C6/36 cell suspension, 50% defibrinated sheep blood and 1 mM ATP. Glass feeders were covered with hog gut and connected to a water jack that had a temperature of 37°C. One feeder was placed on each mosquito carton containing 100 females, which had been starved for around 18 h prior to bloodfeeding. Each glass feeder was then filled with 2 ml cell culture-blood mixture. Mosquitoes were allowed to feed for about 1 h. Only blood-engorged mosquitoes were used in subsequent experiments. Virus titers in the bloodmeals ranged from 7×106-1×107 pfu/ml. Intrathoracic injections of DENV2s were conducted to assess virus replication in mosquito tissues outside the midgut. Seven-day-old females were injected each with 150–200 nl of the virus-cell suspensions with titers of ~1×106 pfu/ml (QR94, EM33, Jam1409), 5×105 pfu/ml (EM41), and 7×106 pfu/ml (PR159).

Virus detection

DENV2 titers of single female midguts and carcasses were analyzed by plaque assays at 7 and 14 days pbm using LLC-MK2 monkey kidney cells. DENV2-infected samples were homogenized in 0.5 ml 7% FBS-complemented DMEM medium before being sterile-filtered with Acrodisc HT Tuffryn 0.2 μm syringe filters (Pall Life Sciences, East Hills, NY). LLC-MK2 cells were seeded into 24-well plates and left for three days to achieve confluence. Cells were infected with 10-fold serial dilutions of individual sample homogenates and then incubated for 1 h at 37°C before being overlaid with an agarose nutrient mixture [1x Medium 199 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 10% FBS, 4% NaHCO3, 0.5% MEM vitamins, 0.5% MEM amino acids (Mediatech Inc., Manassas, VA); 1% Hanks-DEME medium]. Following incubation at 37°C for 12 days, cells were then stained with MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After incubation at 37°C for 24 h the number of plaques was counted for each sample. Virus titers of individual mosquitoes were calculated as plaque forming units (pfu)/ml.

RT-PCR and cDNA sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from 1–2 ml aliquots of DENV2-infected C6/36 cell suspensions using TRIzol LS reagent (Invitrogen, CA). RT-PCR was conducted using the Superscript II One-Step RT-PCR with Platinum Taq kit (Invitrogen, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Full-length cDNAs of the different DENV2 strains were sequenced. Therefore, 23 sets of PCR primers were designed to generate PCR products of around 500 bp in size that each overlapped by 50–100 bp. Viral cDNA encoding the 5′ and 3′ UTRs were amplified using 5′ and 3′RACE Systems for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (Invitrogen, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products were purified using the Qiagen PCR Purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and then directly sequenced using an ABI-3130×L Genetic Analyzer. Presence of mutations was confirmed by repeated sequencing using different cDNA sources.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism software package (version 5.04). Raw plaque data were Y = Log(Y) transformed to ensure homogenous variances among data points and then analyzed by the ANOVA procedure followed by Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. To compare virus titers only positive values were included in the statistical analysis. Midgut infection and dissemination rates were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact Test.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CCHK conceived and designed the experiments, performed virus challenge experiments of mosquitoes, conducted virus detection assays, and analyzed the data. JBD assisted with virus challenge experiments, performed sample preparations, and assisted with virus detection assays. NLH conducted the phylogenetic analysis. KEO discussed the experimental design, analyzed the data, and helped to prepare the manuscript. AWEF is PI of the NIH grants that made these studies possible, conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. The authors approve submission of the manuscript to Virology Journal. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1:

Maximum likelihood phylogeny for American genotype DENV2 strains including DENV2-QR94 and DENV2-PR159. DENV2 viruses originated from Central-America, South-America, the Caribbean, and Polynesia/Melanesia. DENV2-Jam1409, belonging to the American-Asian genotype, is included for comparison. Bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown and indicate support as a percent of 1000 replicates. Scale bar represents 0.01 substitutions per site.

Additional file 2:

Nucleotide alignments of the 453 nt 3′UTRs of American genotype DENV2-QR94, PR159, EM33, and EM41. Mismatches are highlighted in red.


The authors thank Monica Heersink for mosquito rearing. This work was funded by R01 grants AI073298-01 and AI091972-01 from the National Institutes of Health.


  • Gubler DJ. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases as public health problems. Arch Med Res. 2002;10(4):330–342. doi: 10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00378-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guzman A, Isturiz RE. Update on the global spread of dengue. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;10(1):40–42. [PubMed]
  • Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;10(2):328–345. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Salazar MI, Richardson JH, Sanchez-Vargas I, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. Dengue virus type 2: replication and tropisms in orally infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. BMC Microbiol. 2007;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Linthicum KJ, Platt K, Myint KS, Lerdthusnee K, Innis BL, Vaughn DW. Dengue 3 virus distribution in the mosquito Aedes aegypti: an immunocytochemical study. Med Vet Entomol. 1996;10(1):87–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1996.tb00086.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chen WJ, Wei HL, Hsu EL, Chen ER. Vector competence of Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to dengue 1 virus on Taiwan: development of the virus in orally and parenterally infected mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 1993;10(3):524–530. [PubMed]
  • Mercado-Curiel RF, Black WC 4th, Muñoz Mde L. A dengue receptor as possible genetic marker of vector competence in Aedes aegypti. BMC Microbiol. 2008;10:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Black WC 4th, Bennett KE, Gorrochotegui-Escalante N, Barillas-Mury CV, Fernandez-Salas I, de Lourdes MM, Farfan-Ale J, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. Flavivirus Susceptibility in Aedes aegypti. Arch Med Res. 2002;10(4):379–388. doi: 10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00373-9. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bennett KE, Olson KE, Munoz Mde L, Fernandez-Salas I, Farfan-Ale JA, Higgs S, Black WC, Beaty BJ. Variation in vector competence for dengue 2 virus among 24 collections of Aedes aegypti from Mexico and the United States. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2002;10(1):85–92. [PubMed]
  • Bennett KE, Flick D, Fleming KH, Jochim R, Beaty BJ, Black WC. Quantitative trait loci that control Dengue-2 virus dissemination in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Genet. 2005;10(1):185–194. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.035634. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bennett KE, Beaty BJ, Black WC. Selection of D2S3, an Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) strain with high oral susceptibility to dengue 2 virus and D2MEB, a strain with a midgut barrier to dengue 2 escape. J Med Entomol. 2005;10(2):110–119. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585(2005)042[0110:SODAAA]2.0.CO;2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Cox J, Brown HE, Rico-Hesse R. Variation in vector competence for dengue viruses does not depend on mosquito midgut binding affinity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;10(5):e1172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pierro DJ, Powers EL, Olson KE. Genetic determinants of Sindbis virus strain TR339 affecting midgut infection in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Gen Virol. 2007;10(5):1545–1554. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82577-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pierro DJ, Powers EL, Olson KE. Genetic determinants of Sindbis virus mosquito infection are associated with a highly conserved alphavirus and flavivirus envelope sequence. J Virol. 2008;10(6):2966–2974. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02060-07. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Bosio CF, Fulton RE, Salasek ML, Beaty BJ, Black WC 4th. Quantitative trait loci that control vector competence for dengue-2 virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Genet. 2000;10(2):687–698. [PubMed]
  • Gomez-Machorro C, Bennett KE, del Lourdes MM, Black WC 4th. Quantitative trait loci affecting dengue midgut infection barriers in an advanced intercross line of Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol Biol. 2004;10(6):637–648. doi: 10.1111/j.0962-1075.2004.00522.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Means JC, Passarelli AL. Viral fibroblast growth factor, matrix metalloproteases, and caspases are associated with enhancing systemic infection by baculoviruses. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;10(21):9825–9830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913582107. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Guzman MG, Kouri GP, Bravo J, Soler M, Vazquez S, Morier L. Dengue hemorrhagic fever in Cuba, 1981: a retrospective seroepidemiologic study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;10(2):179–184. [PubMed]
  • Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. Efficiency of dengue serotype 2 virus strains to infect and disseminate in Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;10(5):539–544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Anderson JR, Rico-Hesse R. Aedes aegypti vectorial capacity is determined by the infecting genotype of dengue virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;10(5):886–892. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Salazar MI, Lorono-Pino MA, Farfan-Ale J, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. American and American/Asian genotypes of dengue virus differe in mosquito infection efficiency: candidate molecular determinants of productive vector infection. Rev Biomed. 2010;10:121–135.
  • Diaz FJ, Farfan-Ale JA, Olson KE, Lorono-Pino MA, Gubler DJ, Blair CD, Black WC, Beaty BJ. Genetic variation within the premembrane coding region of dengue viruses from the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;10(1):93–101. [PubMed]
  • Lorono-Pino MA, Farfan-Ale JA, Zapapta-Peraza AL, Rosado-Peredes EP, Flores-Flores LF, Garcia-Rejon JE, Diaz F, Blitvich BJ, Andrade-Narvaez M, Jiminez-Rios E, Blair CD, Olson KE, Black WC, Beaty BJ. Introduction of American/Asian genotype of Dengue 2 virus into the Yucatan State of Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;10(4):485–492. [PubMed]
  • Hahn YS, Galler R, Hunkapiller T, Dalrymple M, Strauss JH, Strauss EG. Nucleotide sequence of dengue 2 RNA and comparison of the encoded proteins with those of other flaviviruses. Virol. 1988;10(1):167–180. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(88)90406-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Chin-inmanu K, Suttitheptumrong A, Sangsrakru D, Tangphatsornruang S, Tragoonrung S, Malasit P, Tungpradabkul S, Suriyaphol P. Feasibility of using 454 pyrosequencing for studying quasispecies of the whole dengue viral genome. BMC Genomics. 2012;10:S7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rico-Hesse R. Molecular evolution and distribution of dengue viruses type 1 and 2 in nature. Virol. 1990;10(2):479–493. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(90)90102-W. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Salas RA, Tovar D, Ananda N, Ramos C, Boshell J, de Mesa MT, Nogueira RMR, de Rosa AT. Origins of dengue type 2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virol. 1997;10(2):244–251. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8504. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pryor MJ, Carr JM, Hocking H, Davidson AD, Li P, Wright PJ. Replication of dengue virus type 2 in human monocyte-derived macrophages: comparisons of isolates and recombinant viruses with substitutions at amino acid 390 in the envelope glycoprotein. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;10(5):427–434. [PubMed]
  • Leitmeyer KC, Vaughn DW, Watts DM, Salas R, de Chacon IV, Ramos C, Rico-Hesse R. Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis. J Virol. 1999;10(6):4738–4747. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cologna R, Armstrong PM, Rico-Hesse R. Selection for virulent dengue viruses occurs in humans and mosquitoes. J Virol. 2005;10(2):853–859. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.2.853-859.2005. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Keelapang P, Sriburi R, Supasa S, Panyadee N, Songjaeng A, Jairungsri A, Puttikhunt C, Kasinrerk W, Malasit P, Sittisombut N. Alterations of pr-M cleavage and virus export in pr-M junction chimeric dengue viruses. J Virol. 2004;10(5):2367–2381. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.5.2367-2381.2004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Kelly EP, Polo S, Sun W, Falgout B. Evolution of attenuating mutations in dengue-2 strain S16803 PDK50 vaccine and comparison of growth kinetics with parent virus. Virus Genes. 2011;10(1):18–26. doi: 10.1007/s11262-011-0602-z. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Zhang Y, Zhang W, Ogata S, Clements D, Strauss JH, Baker TS, Kuhn RJ, Rossmann MG. Conformational changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein. Structure. 2004;10(9):1607–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.06.019. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Khoo CCH, Doty JB, Heersink MS, Olson KE, Franz AWE. Transgene-mediated suppression of the RNA interference pathway in Aedes aegypti interferes with gene silencing and enhances Sindbis virus and dengue virus type 2 replication. Insect Mol Biol. 2013;10(1):104–114. doi: 10.1111/imb.12008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Souza-Neto JA, Sim S, Dimopoulos G. An evolutionary conserved function of the JAK-STAT pathway in anti-dengue defense. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;10(42):17841–17846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905006106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ramirez JL, Dimopoulos G. The Toll immune signaling pathway control conserved anti-dengue defenses across diverse Ae. aegypti strains and against multiple dengue virus serotypes. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;10(6):625–629. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2010.01.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Richardson J, Molina-Cruz A, Salazar MI, Black WC. Quantitative analysis of dengue-2 virus RNA during the extrinsic incubation period in individual Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;10(1):132–141. [PubMed]
  • Franz AWE, Sanchez-Vargas I, Adelman ZN, Blair CD, Beaty BJ, James AA, Olson KE. Engineering RNA interference-based resistance to dengue virus type 2 in genetically modified Aedes aegypti. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;10(11):4198–4203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600479103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Franz AWE, Jasinskiene N, Sanchez-Vargas I, Isaacs AT, Smith MR, Khoo CCH, Heersink MS, James AA, Olson KE. Comparison of transgene expression in Aedes aegypti generated by mariner Mos1 transposition and ΦC31 site-directed recombination. Insect Mol Biol. 2011;10(5):587–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2011.01089.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Pierro DJ, Salazar MI, Beaty BJ, Olson KE. Infectious clone construction of dengue virus type 2, strain Jamaican 1409, and characterization of a conditional E6 mutation. J Gen Virol. 2006;10(8):2263–2268. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81958-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;10(10):2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10(3):512–526. [PubMed]
  • Sanchez-Vargas I, Scott JC, Poole-Smith BK, Franz AWE, Barbosa-Solomieu V, Wilusz J, Olson KE, Blair CD. Dengue virus type 2 infections of Aedes aegypti are modulated by the mosquito’s RNA interference pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2009;10:e1000299. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Virology Journal are provided here courtesy of BioMed Central