PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Stroke. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 August 15.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3744111
NIHMSID: NIHMS114536

May-Thurner Syndrome in patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale – an important clinical association

Abstract

Background and Purpose

We aimed to investigate the incidence of May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) in cryptogenic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Methods

This was a retrospective study. All consecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke having undergone PFO closure from January 1st 2002 to December 31st 2007 at our institute were included in this study. Pelvic magnetic resonance venography (MRV) studies of all patients were reviewed to determine if features of MTS were present. Medical records and invasive venography studies of all patients were reviewed when available. All patients with MTS features on MRV were reviewed by a vascular medicine specialist to define any previous incidence of DVT or any signs of chronic venous insufficiency. All patients also had lower limb venous duplex performed to rule out lower limb venous thrombosis.

Results

A total of 470 patients from January 1 2002 until Dec 31 2007 with cryptogenic stroke underwent PFO closure at our institute. Thirty patients (6.3%) had features consistent with MTS on MRV. These patients were predominantly female (80%) with a mean age of 43.6 ± 11.9 years. Twelve patients (40%) had abnormalities in their laboratory thrombophilia evaluation and 13 females (54.1%) were taking hormone related birth control pills. Only two patients had a history and signs of chronic venous insuffiency. All PFOs demonstrated right-to-left shunting on transesophageal echocardiography. Atrial septal aneurysms/hypermobile atrial septa were present in 70% of patients with MTS.

Conclusion

May-Thurner syndrome has an important clinical association with cryptogenic stroke and PFO.

Introduction

Iliocaval compression, or May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) was initially described as the development of “spurs” in the left iliac vein as a consequence of compression from the contralateral right common iliac artery against the lumbar vertebra is an anatomic variant that is well-recognized (Figure 1) (1, 2). Apart from case reports (3, 4), the association of MTS with cryptogenic stroke in the context of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) has not been studied. The incidence of MTS in patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO is unknown. We endeavored to perform a formal analysis of this understudied cohort of patients.

Figure 1
Anatomical diagram of May-Thurner syndrome with the right common iliac artery overlying the left common iliac vein.

Methods

All consecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke as documented clinically by the referring neurologist and by CT/MRI imaging, having undergone PFO closure from January 1st 2002 to December 31st 2007 at our institution were included in this study. Cryptogenic stroke was defined as a sudden focal neurological event in the absence of an identifiable cause, such as uncontrolled hypertension, intracranial hemorrhage, ipsilateral carotid lesion, atrial fibrillation, intracardiac thrombus, degenerative neurologic disorder or neoplasm. All patients underwent a comprehensive work-up to rule out all of the above conditions. This work-up included CTA and/or MRA, extracranial duplex ultrasonography of the carotid arteries, 24 hour holter monitoring, transthoracic ± tranesophageal echocardiography and a hypercoaguability evaluation.

Pelvic magnetic resonance venography (MRV) studies of all patients were reviewed to determine if features of MTS were present. On the basis of MRV findings, MTS was defined as the presence of deep venous thrombosis in the left common iliac vein or stenosis of the left common iliac vein (Figure 2). Available medical records and invasive contrast venography studies of all patients were reviewed. To define any previous incidence of DVT or signs of chronic venous insufficiency, a vascular medicine consultation was obtained in all patients with the above defined MTS features on MRV. All patients also had lower limb venous duplex performed to rule out lower limb venous thrombosis.

Figure 2
Venographic study demonstrating severe stenosis of the left common iliac vein (black arrow) at the precise location where it lies beneath the right common iliac artery (artery not shown). Extensive pelvic collaterals (white arrow) provide drainage towards ...

To be considered for transcatheter PFO closure at our center, patients must have had ≥1 preceding focal neurological event(s) consistent with stroke/TIA considered by the PFO Committee (neurologist/invasive and non-invasive cardiologist/hematologist) to have been most likely caused by a paradoxical embolus. Moreover, the PFO Committee considered the presence of a significant right to left shunt at rest, an atrial septal aneurysm/hypermobile atrial septum, persistent eustachian valve or chiari netwok as high risk characterisics.

Statistical analysis

All data were entered into a computerized database. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis Systems, version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Data are expressed as means ± SDs for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical data. Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical values. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify the predictors of adverse outcomes, and, if significant, these were tested in a multivariate regression analysis model. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between January 1 2002 and Dec 31 2007, a total of 470 patients with cryptogenic stroke underwent PFO closure at our institution. Thirty patients (6.3%) had features consistent with MTS on MRV. The remaining 440 patients without features of MTS on MRV but having undergone PFO closure in association with cryptogenic stroke were also analyzed as shown in Table 1. Patients with MTS were younger and predominantly female. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and diabetes was higher in the group without features of MTS, albeit not significantly. Interestingly, there was a statistically significant higher prevalence of active smokers in the MTS group. All PFOs demonstrated right-to-left shunting on transesophageal echocardiography. There was no difference in the incidence of atrial septal aneurysms/ hypermobile atrial septa. The mean closure device size did not differ between the groups.

Table 1
Cryptogenic stroke and PFO – clinical features of patients with May- Thurner Syndrome (MTS) and without MTS.

There was a statistically significant higher incidence of laboratory thrombophilia screen abnormalities in the MTS group (Table 1). Twelve patients within the MTS group had abnormalities of their laboratory thrombophilia screen; these included the prothrombin gene mutation (G20210A) (2 patients), Factor V leiden mutation (2 patients), elevated anticardiolipin antibody titre (4 patients), documented antiphospholipid syndrome (1 patient) and protein C (1 patient) or protein S deficiency (2 patients). Of the female patients in the MTS group, 13 females (54.1%) were taking oral contraceptives, 2 females (8.3%) were using hormone-eluting intra-uterine contraceptive devices, and one patient was eight weeks pregnant at the time of cerebral embolic event.

Only two patients had a history and/or signs of chronic venous insuffiency. One patient had a history of multiple previous left sided DVTs. Five patients in total underwent contrast iliac venography for the indications of signs and symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency and query iliac vein thrombus on MRV. Only two patients (6.6%) with MTS underwent percutaneous stenting of the left iliac vein with self-expanding stents; both patients had thrombotic occlusions of the left common iliac veins, presence of collateral vessels and haemodynamically significant gradients on pressure measurements.

Discussion

The pathogenesis of MTS is not completely understood but it is theorized that it may be a combination of both mechanical compression and arterial pulsations by the right iliac artery leading to the development of intimal hypertrophy within the wall of the left common iliac vein. This can lead to potential endothelial changes, thrombus formation and possible cryptogenic stroke in the context of a PFO. The overall incidence of the condition is unknown, with one study reporting 37% of 24 patients with isolated left lower extremity edema having left iliac vein compression by MRV (5). Patients with MTS tend to be young women, in the second to fourth decade of life, after periods of prolonged immobilization or pregnancy. In 1992, Kim et al (6) described three clinical stages of the disease associated with iliac vein compression: stage I, asymptomatic; stage II, development of a venous “spur”; and stage III, thrombosis of the left common iliac vein. The relevance of stage I to cryptogenic stroke in the context of PFO is unknown.

Although the association between MTS and cryptogenic stroke was previously reported in case reports (3, 4), the current study is the first large-scale analysis of the association between MTS, cryptogenic stroke and PFO. In our study we found an incidence of MTS of 6.3% in patients diagnosed with cryptogenic stroke having undergone PFO closure. The majority of these patients were asymptomatic from lower limb venous obstructive symptoms, with MTS representing an incidental diagnosis. However in the context of a previous embolic event, it is conceivable that asymptomatic MTS may be an important clinical association and these patients should be screened by MRV. When compared with the gold standard of contrast venography, MRV has been reported to have 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity in the detection of DVT (7). Many studies have indicated that there is a higher incidence of pelvic/lower extremity thrombi in patients with PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke (8-12).

Paradoxical emboli as a cause of cryptogenic stroke in association with PFO are most probably small emboli that traverse thru the cardiac chambers, en route to the cerebral circulation (13-15). The small size of these emboli, probably reflect their propensity to cause stroke instead of clinically significant pulmonary emboli. Modern day vena cava filters do not have the capacity to prevent small emboli reaching the right heart from the pelvic/lower limb venous circulation.

The direction of flow from the IVC towards the interatrial septum is also important in the genesis of paradoxical emboli in PFO-related cryptogenic stroke. A persistent eustachian valve (EV) is a frequent finding in patients with a PFO (16). By directing the blood from the inferior cava to the interatrial septum, a persisting EV may indirectly predispose to paradoxical systemic embolization in patients with MTS instead of causing pulmonary emboli.

Limitations

This study is limited by being a retrospective study in a high risk population at a specialized tertiary care center. However, we feel that the results are generalizable to a high-risk stroke population at other centers. In addition, women tend to have a more complex pelvic structure and MRV sometimes may not give the best visualization of the venous vasculature.

Conclusion

May-Thurner syndrome has an association with cryptogenic stroke in the context of a PFO. In young patients (<55 years) with cryptogenic stroke and PFO -especially with associated use of oral contraceptives, thrombophilic abnormalities or presence of an atrial septal aneurysm, MTS represents an important condition and warrants screening by MRV. Further prospective studies are needed to define in greater detail the association of MTS with PFO-associated cryptogenic stroke.

Acknowledgments

Dr Ning is supported by the NIH/NINDS: NS051588 and NS052498 (Ning/Lo)

References

1. May R, Thurner J. The cause of the predominately sinistral occurrence of thrombosis of the pelvic veins. Angiology. 1957;8:419–427. [PubMed]
2. Cockett FB, Thomas ML. The iliac compression syndrome. Br J Surg. 1965;52:816–825. [PubMed]
3. Greer DM, Buonanno FS. Cerebral infarction in conjunction with patent foramen ovale and May-Thurner syndrome. J Neuroimaging. 2001 Oct;11(4):432–4. [PubMed]
4. Way J, Lopez-Yunez A, Beristain X, Biller J. Paradoxical embolism to the basilar apex associated with May-Thurner syndrome. Arch Neurol. 2000 Dec;57(12):1761–4. [PubMed]
5. Wolpert LM, Rahmani O, Stein B, Gallagher JJ, Drezner AD. Magnetic resonance venography in the diagnosis and management of May-Thurner syndrome. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;36:51–57. [PubMed]
6. Kim D, Orron DE, Porter DH. Venographic anatomy, technique and interpretation. In: Kim D, Orron DE, editors. Peripheral vascular imaging and intervention. Mosby-Year Book; St Louis (MO): 1992. pp. 269–349.
7. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, Owen RS, Carpenter JT, Cope C. Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1993 Nov;18(5):734–41. [PubMed]
8. Cramer SC, Rordorf G, Maki JH, Kramer LA, Grotta JC, Burgin WS, Hinchey JA, Benesch C, Furie KL, Lutsep HL, Kelly E, Longstreth WT., Jr Increased pelvic vein thrombi in cryptogenic stroke: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study. Stroke. 2004 Jan;35(1):46–50. [PubMed]
9. Cramer SC, Maki JH, Waitches GM, D'Souza N, Grotta JC, Burgin WS, Kramer LA. Paradoxical emboli from calf and pelvic veins in cryptogenic stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2003 Jul;13(3):218–23. [PubMed]
10. d'Audiffret A, Pillai L, Dryjski M. Paradoxical emboli: the relationship between patent foramen ovale, deep vein thrombosis and ischaemic stroke. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999 Jun;17(6):468–71. [PubMed]
11. Yasaka M, Otsubo R, Oe H, Minematsu K. Is stroke a paradoxical embolism in patients with patent foramen ovale? Intern Med. 2005 May;44(5):434–8. [PubMed]
12. Handke M, Harloff A, Olschewski M, Hetzel A, Geibel A. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2262–8. [PubMed]
13. Kizer JR, Devereux RB. Clinical practice. Patent foramen ovale in young adults with unexplained stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 1;353(22):2361–72. [PubMed]
14. Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Zuber M, Cabanes L, Derumeaux G, Coste J. Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Aneurysm Study Group.Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 13;345(24):1740–6. [PubMed]
15. Martín F, Sánchez PL, Doherty E, Colon-Hernandez PJ, Delgado G, Inglessis I, Scott N, Hung J, King ME, Buonanno F, Demirjian Z, de Moor M, Palacios IF. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism. Circulation. 2002 Aug 27;106(9):1121–6. [PubMed]
16. Schuchlenz HW, Saurer G, Weihs W, Rehak P. Persisting eustachian valve in adults: relation to patent foramen ovale and cerebrovascular events. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Mar;17(3):231–3. [PubMed]