PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e67641.
Published online Jul 2, 2013. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0067641
PMCID: PMC3699663
Livestock-Associated Methicillin and Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Is Present among Industrial, Not Antibiotic-Free Livestock Operation Workers in North Carolina
Jessica L. Rinsky,#1 Maya Nadimpalli,#2 Steve Wing,1 Devon Hall,3 Dothula Baron,3 Lance B. Price,4 Jesper Larsen,5 Marc Stegger,5 Jill Stewart,2 and Christopher D. Heaney6,7*
1Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
2Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
3Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help (REACH), Warsaw, North Carolina, United States of America
4Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
5Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
6Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
7Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
Axel Cloeckaert, Editor
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France
#Contributed equally.
* E-mail: cheaney/at/jhsph.edu
Competing Interests: SW provided pro bono testimony in legal proceedings related to landfills and provided pro bono consultation on radiation and health for two law firms that made gifts to the University of North Carolina and another law firm that did not make a gift to the University of North Carolina. He conducted research on epidemiologic investigation of symptoms reported by neighbors of areas where sewage sludge is applied to land funded by the Water Environment Research Foundation. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CH SW JS MN JR LP JL MS DH DB. Performed the experiments: CH MN LP JL MS. Analyzed the data: CH JR MN LP JL MS JS SW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CH MN JS LP JL MS. Wrote the paper: JR MN CH SW JS DH DB LP JL MS.
Received February 19, 2013; Accepted May 20, 2013.
Objectives
Administration of antibiotics to food animals may select for drug-resistant pathogens of clinical significance, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In the United States, studies have examined prevalence of MRSA carriage among individuals exposed to livestock, but prevalence of multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MDRSA) carriage and the association with livestock raised with versus without antibiotic selective pressure remains unclear. We aimed to examine prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility, and molecular characteristics of S. aureus among industrial livestock operation (ILO) and antibiotic-free livestock operation (AFLO) workers and household members in North Carolina.
Methods
Participants in this cross-sectional study were interviewed and provided a nasal swab for S. aureus analysis. Resulting S. aureus isolates were assessed for antibiotic susceptibility, multi-locus sequence type, and absence of the scn gene (a marker of livestock association).
Results
Among 99 ILO and 105 AFLO participants, S. aureus nasal carriage prevalence was 41% and 40%, respectively. Among ILO and AFLO S. aureus carriers, MRSA was detected in 7% (3/41) and 7% (3/42), respectively. Thirty seven percent of 41 ILO versus 19% of 42 AFLO S. aureus-positive participants carried MDRSA. S. aureus clonal complex (CC) 398 was observed only among workers and predominated among ILO (13/34) compared with AFLO (1/35) S. aureus-positive workers. Only ILO workers carried scn-negative MRSA CC398 (2/34) and scn-negative MDRSA CC398 (6/34), and all of these isolates were tetracycline resistant.
Conclusions
Despite similar S. aureus and MRSA prevalence among ILO and AFLO-exposed individuals, livestock-associated MRSA and MDRSA (tetracycline-resistant, CC398, scn-negative) were only present among ILO-exposed individuals. These findings support growing concern about antibiotics use and confinement in livestock production, raising questions about the potential for occupational exposure to an opportunistic and drug-resistant pathogen, which in other settings including hospitals and the community is of broad public health importance.
Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen carried by animals and approximately one third of humans, primarily in the nares [1]. S. aureus causes a range of human infections, from superficial to systemic [2] and strains resistant to methicillin (MRSA) have become leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States [3], [4]. In recent years, emergent multidrug-resistant strains of S. aureus (MDRSA) have made treatment of S. aureus infections more protracted, more burdensome, and less successful [5].
The epidemiology of S. aureus infection is evolving rapidly. Recognition of the prominence of community-acquired compared with hospital-acquired infections [6], the importance of MDRSA (that are not necessarily resistant to methicillin) as causes of infection [7], and the role of nasal carriage, which has been shown to increase the risk of subsequent S. aureus infection in clinical settings [8], is increasing. However, the origins and routes of transmission of community-acquired S. aureus infection as well as reservoirs of selective pressure that drive emergent strains and drug resistance remain poorly characterized in the United States [9].
Industrial food-animal production facilities have been identified as a source of human exposure to antibiotic-resistant S. aureus, including MRSA and MDRSA [10]. The practices of intensive confinement and administration of antibiotics to animals – including non-therapeutically for growth promotion – are commonly used in industrial food-animal production and provide a reservoir for the selection of novel, antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can be exchanged between animals and humans.
Concerns have been rising about the dissemination of clonal complexes (CCs) of S. aureus that circulate among livestock and are now recognized as causes of human infections in the community and hospitals [11]. Of particular interest is S. aureus CC398, first reported among pig farmers in France in 2005 [12] and later among pigs and pig handlers across Europe [13] and North America [14]. Although human infections from livestock-associated S. aureus CC398 and MRSA CC398 appear to be rare at this time in the United States [13], spread of MRSA CC398 from livestock to humans has increased the burden of MRSA infections in many European countries, including Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands [13], [15][18]. Despite a well-developed knowledge base in Europe [16][18], little is known about antibiotic-resistant S. aureus carriage among livestock workers and their household members in the United States, particularly individuals exposed to livestock that are not raised using antibiotic inputs [19].
In addition, few studies examining carriage of S. aureus among individuals in contact with livestock have attempted to differentiate human- from livestock-associated strains based on phenotypic and molecular markers. While some have defined livestock-associated S. aureus based on resistance pattern and CC [20], [21], few have incorporated recent evidence suggesting that absence of the bacteriophage-encoded scn immune evasion cluster (IEC) gene may be a useful indicator of S. aureus livestock adaptation [20], [22], [23]. scn has been detected at a relatively low frequency among diverse collections of S. aureus isolates obtained from livestock (2%–35%) compared to those obtained from humans (90–100%) [20], [22], [23]. Loss of the IEC cluster has been observed during two independent human-to-animal host jumps by S. aureus ST5 and CC398, suggesting that the scn gene is selected against in animal hosts [20], [24]. Thus, among food animal production workers, the scn gene may be useful to differentiate livestock-to-human transmission from community-acquired human colonization and help improve assessment of occupational exposure risks associated with livestock production.
In the present study, we aimed to examine the prevalence of carriage and phenotypic and molecular characteristics of S. aureus among industrial and antibiotic-free livestock workers and their household members in North Carolina. We also investigated potential occupational risk factors for carriage and evidence of potential strain concordance within households between workers and household members.
Ethics Statement
The UNC Public Health-Nursing institutional review board approved this study. Before participating, adult participants provided written informed consent. Written parental permission and informed assent were collected for participants seven to 17 years of age.
Data were collected between May and December 2011 in North Carolina, USA by researchers from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) with organizers from two community organizations – the Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help (REACH) and the North Carolina Environmental Justice Network (NCEJN).
Study Population
Participants were enrolled using a snowball sampling approach. Individuals were eligible if they worked at an operation that housed swine or poultry, resided in North Carolina, were at least 18 years old, and could understand English or Spanish. Up to two individuals living in the same household as a participating worker were eligible to participate if they were at least seven years old and able to understand English or Spanish.
Participants reported occupational activities, contact with livestock, household and environmental exposures, personal activities, medical history, and demographic information. Participants who worked at operations where animals were raised exclusively in confinement were classified as industrial livestock operation (ILO) workers. Those who reported working at operations that raised animals outdoors, on pasture, and did not administer antibiotics to raise animals were classified as antibiotic-free livestock operation (AFLO) workers. Each worker’s respective household members were included in the same group as the worker, thereby defining two exposure groups –1) ILO workers and their household members; and, 2) AFLO workers and their household members. Because of concerns about privacy and confidentiality with respect to employment among ILO workers where there is a history of intimidation tactics [25], no identifying information about livestock operations was collected – including name of livestock operation of employment and whether participants worked at the same livestock operation as other participants.
Detection of S. aureus and MRSA
Study personnel obtained a nasal swab from both nares of each participant using a BD BBL™ CultureSwab™. Swabs were inoculated into 10 ml of Mueller-Hinton broth containing 6.5% NaCl, then incubated overnight at 37°C. To isolate presumptive S. aureus, a loopful of Mueller-Hinton broth was streaked onto CHROMagar™ Staph aureus plates (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Colonies with morphology characteristic of S. aureus were streaked to isolation. To isolate presumptive MRSA, 1 ml of bacteria-enriched Mueller-Hinton broth was subsequently transferred to 10 ml of tryptic soy broth containing 2.5% NaCl, 3.5 mg/L cefoxitin, and 10 mg/L aztreonam, then incubated overnight at 37°C. Isolation of presumptive MRSA colonies from tryptic soy broth followed the same procedure as for presumptive S. aureus.
DNA from presumptive S. aureus and MRSA colonies was extracted using Qiagen’s DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), with a protocol for gram-positive bacteria recommended by the manufacturer. A multiplex PCR assay was used to amplify the 16S rRNA, nuc, and mecA genes in all extracted isolates [26]. Amplified gene products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis. Isolates that were positive for the 16S rRNA and nuc genes were classified as S. aureus. S. aureus isolates that were positive for the mecA gene were classified as MRSA. Molecular findings were confirmed using catalase and tube coagulase testing with rabbit plasma (BD BBL, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Antibiotic Susceptibility
One isolate per S. aureus-positive individual was assessed for susceptibility to a panel of 12 antibiotic classes, comprising 16 antibiotics (see Supporting Information Table S1 in File S1 for listing of antibiotics). The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used to assess susceptibility to all antibiotics except vancomycin; diameter interpretations were based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [27]. Inducible clindamycin resistance was evaluated in erythromycin-resistant isolates using the D-zone test [28]. Vancomycin susceptibility was assessed for all isolates on brain heart infusion agar supplemented with 5 mg/L vancomycin hydrochloride using methods adapted from CLSI [29]. MRSA isolates were verified phenotypically by complete resistance to oxacillin and complete or intermediate resistance to ceftriaxone. Isolates that demonstrated complete resistance to three or more classes of antibiotics were classified as MDRSA [30]. MRSA isolates meeting the definition of MDRSA were classified as multidrug-resistant MRSA.
Whole-genome Sequencing and Molecular Typing
Whole-genome sequencing of one isolate per S. aureus-positive individual was carried out on an Illumina Genome AnalyzerIIx at the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) (Flagstaff, AZ), as described elsewhere [20]. De novo assemblies were generated by Velvet [31]. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) was performed on de novo assemblies as described elsewhere [32], and CCs were determined using eBURST (version 3; http://eburst.mlst.net) and the stringent group definition (6/7 shared alleles) [33]. S. aureus isolates were assigned to standardized sequence types using open-access, online tools (www.mlst.net). Isolates observed to have novel alleles or allelic profiles by in-silico typing were confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing [34], then submitted to the MLST database. De novo assemblies were analyzed by BLASTN using the scn gene (GenBank accession no. NC_009641, NWMN_1876) as query.
Statistical Analysis
We compared percentages of participants with potential demographic and environmental risk factors for carriage in the two exposure groups. We also compared workers’ reported direct contact with animals on an average day and the hours per week spent in direct contact with animals at work. Chi-square values and degrees of freedom are reported from Pearson’s chi-square tests for independence. We do not report corresponding p-values because they are often interpreted incorrectly in non-randomized studies as reflecting the probability that the results would be observed by chance under the null hypothesis that no difference exists between the groups being compared [35].
We calculated the prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus in both groups. Among participants carrying S. aureus, we calculated the proportion resistant to the 16 antibiotics and the proportion of MRSA, MDRSA, S. aureus CC398, and S. aureus lacking the scn gene. Where sample size allowed, we examined associations between the demographic and environmental risk factors and carriage of S. aureus, and the prevalence of the aforementioned phenotypic and molecular characteristics.
Crude prevalence ratios (PR) comparing carriage among the ILO group to carriage among the AFLO group along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated from log binomial models using generalized estimating equations with an unstructured correlation matrix to account for the non-independence of observations within households [36]. Analyses were conducted separately for workers; however, workers and household members were also evaluated together because of their shared environments. Adjusted PRs are not presented because key variables were distributed differently between the groups. We report 95% CIs to provide information regarding the precision of the observed prevalence ratios.
To identify the proportion of S. aureus potentially associated with livestock contact, we considered the distribution of three indicators of livestock association – resistance to tetracycline, presence of CC398, and absence of the scn-gene – within the ILO and AFLO groups. We refer to isolates with all three of these markers as livestock-associated S. aureus.
Among workers, we examined associations between work activities that involve direct contact with animals and the prevalence of MDRSA and S. aureus exhibiting indicators of livestock-association.
Finally, we examined strain concordance using phenotypic and molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolated from participants living in the same household. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Participant Characteristics
Participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among 99 ILO and 105 AFLO participants, 80.8% and 87.6%, respectively, were workers. Most of the AFLO group identified as non-Hispanic white (79.1%), and most of the ILO group identified as Hispanic (81.8%). AFLO participants reported higher levels of education and a greater proportion reported pets living in the home than ILO participants.
Table 1
Table 1
Distribution of characteristics among all study participants by exposure group, North Carolina, 2011.
Table 2 illustrates work exposures related to direct contact with animals for ILO and AFLO workers. ILO workers mainly reported direct contact with either swine or poultry, although one worker reported direct contact with both. Most AFLO workers reported direct contact with both swine and poultry and 79.3% reported direct contact with other livestock as compared to only 2.5% of ILO workers. ILO workers reported direct contact with larger numbers of animals and for more hours/week than AFLO workers. Most AFLO household members reported direct contact with livestock at home while few ILO household members reported direct contact with livestock (information not shown).
Table 2
Table 2
Characteristics of livestock operations and worker exposures, North Carolina, 2011.
Prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA
Forty-one of 99 (41.4%) ILO and 42/105 (40.0%) AFLO participants carried S. aureus (Table 3). Characteristics of all S. aureus isolates are described in Figure 1. MRSA was detected in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/42 (7.1%) S. aureus-positive ILO and AFLO participants, respectively. Among S. aureus-positive participants, 15/41 (36.6%) ILO participants and 8/42 (19.0%) AFLO participants carried MDRSA. Two of three MRSA isolates from ILO participants were also multidrug-resistant (Figure 1). Multidrug-resistant MRSA was not detected among AFLO participants.
Table 3
Table 3
Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of S. aureus carriage among study participants by livestock exposure group, North Carolina, 2011.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Antibiotic resistance profiles, clonal complexes, and multi-locus sequence types of all S. aureus isolates from (A) ILO and (B) AFLO participants, stratified by scn status, North Carolina, 2011.
Participant characteristics shown in Table 1 showed little association with carriage of S. aureus or MDRSA within groups (information not shown). Examination of associations between these characteristics and MRSA carriage was not possible due to small numbers.
Antibiotic Drug Resistance Phenotypes
Of the 16 antibiotics tested, complete or intermediate resistance was observed to all antibiotics except vancomycin, linezolid, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Figure 1). Compared to S. aureus-positive AFLO participants 1/42 (2.4%), complete resistance to tetracycline was present in 19/41 (46.3%) S. aureus-positive ILO participants (Prevalence Ratio [PR]: 19.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7, 140.4) (Table 3).
MLST of S. aureus
MLST revealed a diversity of CCs, or clusters of closely-related sequence types, among individuals with S. aureus, including CC1, CC5, CC8, CC9, CC30, CC45, CC97, and CC398 (Figure 1). Thirteen of 41 (31.7%) S. aureus-positive ILO participants carried CC398, compared with 1/42 (2.4%) S. aureus-positive AFLO participants (PR: 13.3; 95% CI: 1.8, 98.7) (Table 3). All ILO or AFLO participants who carried S. aureus CC398 were workers. Six new sequence types were detected in this study, and were distributed primarily within the ILO group (Figure 1). A novel singleton (ST2552) most closely related to CC398– a double locus variant (sharing 5/7 alleles with the founder of this CC) – was detected in the ILO group (Figure 1).
Prevalence of scn-negative S. aureus
scn-negative S. aureus isolates were more prevalent among ILO (41.5%; 17/41) than AFLO (14.3%; 6/42) participants (PR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.3, 6.4) (Table 3). All MRSA isolates detected among ILO participants (3/3) were scn-negative, whereas none of the MRSA isolates from AFLO participants were scn-negative (Figure 1). Among ILO participants, 70.6% (12/17) of scn-negative isolates compared with 12.5% (3/24) of scn-positive isolates were MDRSA (Figure 1).
Markers of Livestock Association
Overlap between phenotypic (tetracycline resistance) and molecular (CC398, scn-negative) markers of livestock association (Figure 1) was predominantly observed among ILO participants. Among ILO participants who carried scn-negative S. aureus, 82.3% (14/17) exhibited at least one other characteristic of livestock association (CC398 or tetracycline resistance) and 64.7% (11/17) exhibited all three characteristics. S. aureus CC398 isolates were predominantly tetracycline-resistant, scn-negative, and observed among ILO participants. The single S. aureus CC398 isolate observed among AFLO participants was tetracycline resistant but scn-positive. scn-negative S. aureus CC398, scn-negative MRSA CC398, and scn-negative MDRSA CC398 were only observed among ILO participants (Table 3). Three of six scn-negative S. aureus isolates among AFLO participants were MDRSA (Figure 1), but no overlap in the three characteristics of livestock association was observed among AFLO participants.
Occupational and Environmental Risk Factors
Associations between reported work activities and carriage of MDRSA and S. aureus displaying phenotypic and molecular markers of livestock association are shown in Table 4. ILO workers with direct contact with breeding pigs demonstrated a greater prevalence of MDRSA nasal carriage (PR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.0, 5.7) and tetracycline-resistant scn-negative S. aureus CC398 (PR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.0, 6.4), compared with workers not working in direct contact with breeding pigs.
Table 4
Table 4
Associations between reported work activities and carriage of MDRSA and tetracycline-resistant scn-negative S. aureus CC398 among ILO workersa carrying S. aureus.
Results regarding the concordance of S. aureus found among workers and their respective household members are presented in Supporting Information Table S2a–b in File S1. There were few similarities in S. aureus phenotype or molecular characteristics within households.
Despite a similar prevalence of carriage of S. aureus and MRSA among ILO and AFLO-exposed individuals, the distribution of S. aureus demonstrating characteristics of livestock association (tetracycline resistance, CC398, scn-negative) differed between groups. This is the first report of a livestock-associated strain of S. aureus CC398 (including MRSA CC398 and MDRSA CC398) in North Carolina. We observed that individuals who worked with livestock raised using intensive confinement and antibiotic inputs, including antibiotics administered non-therapeutically, carried MRSA and MDRSA with multiple markers of livestock-association (tetracycline-resistance, CC398, scn-negative). Individuals who worked with livestock raised without the use of antibiotics and confinement were not observed to be carrying MRSA and MDRSA demonstrating multiple markers of livestock-association. We also observed some indication that, regardless of markers of livestock association, there was an elevated proportion of S. aureus that was MDRSA among ILO compared to AFLO participants.
Previous work demonstrates the potential for transmission of S. aureus between animals and humans on ILO and AFLO operations [37][40]. A study conducted on Dutch dairy farms [37] and another across livestock production sectors in Belgium [38] observed nearly indistinguishable MRSA CC398 isolates in humans and various types of animals on the same property. Both of these studies focused on MRSA CC398, but also observed transmission of multidrug-resistant MRSA CC398. In the present study, we observed a higher prevalence of livestock-associated S. aureus strains among ILO participants and a higher prevalence of human epidemic clones of S. aureus among AFLO participants. This is consistent with previously published studies of S. aureus carriage among workers and pigs at conventional [14] and non-conventional [19] farms in the United States. However, since we studied human carriage only, our ability to draw inferences about the directionality, frequency, or intensity of S. aureus exchange between animals and humans in ILO or AFLO settings is limited.
S. aureus CC398, which has been identified as an emerging livestock-associated S. aureus strain in Europe [41][43], is commonly considered as a molecular marker of livestock-associated S. aureus. Near universal resistance to tetracycline has been reported among S. aureus CC398 isolates from livestock and humans in close contact with livestock [20], [41] and tetracycline-susceptibility has been reported among S. aureus CC398 collected from humans with no known livestock exposure [21], [44]. These observations are consistent with findings reported by Price et al. (2012) that CC398 acquired resistance to methicillin and tetracycline after the introduction to livestock from humans [20]. In the Price et al. (2012) study of historical isolates, the tetracycline resistance gene tet(M) was found among 99% of isolates from livestock and absent from isolates obtained from humans [20]. Thus, tetracycline resistance in conjunction with CC398 has been used as a marker of livestock-associated S. aureus. Since the 1950s, tetracycline and its derivatives have been used extensively in US livestock production for non-therapeutic purposes such as growth promotion [45], [46]. In 2011, approximately 5.6 million pounds of tetracycline were sold and distributed in the United States, the greatest amount for any drug class approved for use in food-producing animals [47]. Our observation of a greater prevalence of tetracycline-resistant S. aureus, including MRSA and MDRSA, among ILO compared with AFLO participants is consistent with the historical and ongoing use of tetracycline in industrial livestock production. Although tetracycline resistance is important to note with regard to its use in animal production, it is also used in clinical settings to treat human infections, including skin and soft tissue S. aureus infections [48].
Recent work has demonstrated that absence of the scn gene may aid in the differentiation of animal origins of S. aureus carried by humans exposed to livestock [20], [22][24]. In the present study, the majority of scn-negative strains carried by ILO participants (70.6%), belonged to CC398. All other scn-negative strains carried by participants also belonged to CCs that have previously been described in animals (CC97, CC45, CC30, CC9, CC8, CC5, CC1) [49], [50]. CC30 has recently been described in livestock in Europe [50] and was the most prevalent scn-negative strain among AFLO participants in our study. The majority of scn-negative isolates from ILO participants (82.3%) were resistant to tetracycline while those from AFLO participants were not. Within the ILO group, substantial overlap occurred among markers of livestock-association (tetracycline resistance, CC398, scn-negative). Within the AFLO group, little overlap of the markers of livestock-association was observed. One CC398 isolate was observed among the AFLO group, and while it demonstrated tetracycline resistance, it carried the scn gene. Further, among the AFLO participants no scn-negative isolates were tetracycline resistant or CC398. These findings suggest that while both groups may be exposed to MRSA and MDRSA, individuals working in the ILO setting may be exposed to a larger or more sustained livestock reservoir of MRSA and MDRSA, or that these livestock-associated MRSA and MDRSA are transmitted more frequently between animals and humans in the ILO as compared to the AFLO setting.
Although scn appears to be a promising marker, additional work is needed to establish its validity as an indicator of livestock-associated S. aureus. It is not known how long scn is harbored by human-origin S. aureus strains once passed to livestock hosts, nor are the factors that might influence the speed of scn bacteriophage loss fully understood, although previous work showed that feed-delivered antibiotics can induce prophage loss [51]. Establishing the temporal dynamics of scn presence/absence among S. aureus passed between humans and animals will help determine its utility as a marker of livestock association.
When using all participants as the denominator – to facilitate population prevalence comparisons with other studies – the overall prevalence of S. aureus (39%) and MRSA (3.4%) in our study were slightly greater than estimates of prevalence of S. aureus (30.4%; 95% CI: 29.4, 31.5%) and MRSA (1.2%; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.5%) carriage in the general US population from 2001–2004 [1]. Additional comparison of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage prevalence with populations similar to the present study is challenging as few other studies examine carriage among populations not receiving or working in medical care. There is little basis for making comparisons to other MDRSA population prevalence estimates because most other studies investigate MRSA only, or do not provide sufficient information to interpret study population denominators for MDRSA carriage.
Smith et al. examined MRSA carriage among 20 workers employed at two industrial swine production facilities in Iowa and Illinois [14]. MRSA was detected among swine in one facility where 9/14 workers were also found to carry MRSA. All observed MRSA was tetracycline-resistant CC398. No MRSA was detected among swine or workers in the second facility, leading to an overall MRSA carriage prevalence of 45% among workers. Although the overall MRSA prevalence among ILO workers reported in the present study (3/80; 4%) was lower than that reported by Smith et al., the present study included workers from a larger number and a more diverse cross-section of ILOs. While we did not ask workers to reveal their place of employment for reasons of privacy and confidentiality, our sampling of ILO workers from a larger number of operations is based in part on knowledge of the average number of employees at each operation. Data from the 2007 Census of Agriculture conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture indicate that the reported industry-wide average number of employees on hog and pig farming operations in North Carolina was 6.8 among 938 out of 1619 operations that reported having hired labor (the remaining 681 operations reported having no hired labor) [52].
Smith et al. (2013) also examined carriage of MRSA among weaned pigs and 148 workers on ILOs and AFLOs in Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, and North Carolina [40]. MRSA-positive herds were only found in Iowa and Illinois. MRSA was not found among AFLO pigs or among AFLO workers, whereas we found 3 of 92 AFLO workers (3.3%) to be MRSA-positive. Smith et al. (2013) observed 8.5% MRSA prevalence among ILO pigs. Overall, 31 ILO workers were positive for MRSA carriage and 27 of 31 (87%) MRSA-positive workers were employed at ILOs where MRSA was detected among pigs. Further comparison with our study’s findings is not possible because ILO and AFLO worker denominator information was not included in Smith et al. (2013) [40].
The present study would be strengthened by sampling animals and production facilities [14], [53]; however, we did not have access during the course of the study. Access to livestock operations by the public health research community in Europe and other countries has allowed a robust body of evidence to develop there regarding the extent of exposure to S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA among ILO workers as well as the potential dissemination of livestock-associated strains into the broader community. Though our study may be viewed as small, to the best of our knowledge, it is one of the largest studies on this topic in the United States to date. Furthermore, it was not restricted to ILOs that have agreed to participate in research.
In principle, the difference in characteristics of S. aureus observed among the ILO compared to the AFLO group could be related to livestock exposures, to other differences between the AFLO and ILO participant populations, or to a combination of the two. The ILO and AFLO study populations appeared different in their demographic make-up; 82% of ILO participants in our study self-identified as Hispanic whereas 79% of AFLO participants identified as non-Hispanic white. Industrial swine operations in North Carolina are disproportionately located in low income communities of color in the eastern portion of the state [54]. Differences in ethnicity and education between ILO and AFLO workers reflect differences in the communities where they live, and differences in S. aureus subtypes circulating in these populations could affect differences in carriage observed in this study. Although some factors (e.g. recent antibiotic use and hospitalization) associated with risk of carriage of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus were similar between groups or greater among the AFLO group (pets in the home) [55][57]; the latter would tend to offset any differences in the study groups due to occupational exposures.
Because we did not sample from an enumerated base population (e.g., employee rosters) it is unclear how generalizable these results may be to all ILO workers in North Carolina or the United States. Notwithstanding this limitation, our findings raise important questions about the frequency of potential occupational exposure to antibiotic-resistant S. aureus among an estimated 292,000 livestock workers in the United States in 2012 [52], [58], [59].
Despite current understanding of livestock-associated MRSA as a relatively rare cause of human infection in the United States (which may be limited due to a lack of systematic national surveillance) [13], there is public health concern about potential broad dissemination of drug-resistant S. aureus to the general public. Although others have observed evidence of phenotypic and molecular strain concordance within households [60], we did not observe S. aureus strain concordance between workers and household members. However, relatively few household members participated in this study and consequently this finding should be interpreted with caution. We also assessed only one S. aureus colony per colonized individual for all outcomes presented. It is possible that some individuals carried multiple S. aureus strains. We may not have captured all carriage states of some individuals and consequently may have missed potential occurrences of strain concordance within households. To advance understanding of patterns of potential household transmission, future studies should address these limitations.
The results reported here show that the proportion of S. aureus identified as MDRSA and the proportion exhibiting phenotypic and molecular markers of livestock association was elevated among individuals exposed to the ILO environment compared to those exposed to the AFLO environment. Carriage of scn-negative MRSA CC398 and scn-negative MDRSA CC398 was limited to individuals with direct exposure to ILO production – all of these isolates were also resistant to tetracycline. Whether or not these livestock-associated S. aureus strains (including MRSA and MDRSA) pose a health risk to workers and the broader public requires further investigation. Overall, our findings support growing concern about antibiotic use and confinement in livestock production, and raise questions about the potential for occupational exposure to an opportunistic and drug-resistant pathogen which in other settings including hospitals and the community is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States [4], [61] and globally [6], [7].
Supporting Information
File S1
Table S1: List of antibiotics by antibiotic class used in antibiotic-susceptibility testing. Table S2a–b: Phenotypic and molecular characteristics of S. aureus detected among households by exposure groups. Individuals in households shaded in gray displayed some level of strain concordance between worker and household member carriage status.
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
This study would not have been possible without a strong partnership between researchers and community-based organizations that have the trust of ILO and other members of communities in areas where ILO density is high. The authors would like to thank ILO and AFLO participants for their participation in this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Naeema Muhammad, Norma Mejia, Jennifer Hall, Ronald Hall, Paul Baker, Clifton Smith, Alice Ammerman, Alan Kinlaw, and Sarah Hatcher for input and assistance with study design and data collection, and Elizabeth Pierce, UNC Hospital’s Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, and Tania Contente-Cuomo for assistance with laboratory analyses.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, North Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Center, the W.K. Kellogg Health Scholars Program – Community Track, and a Gillings Innovation Laboratory award from the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. CDH was supported by the W.K. Kellogg Health Scholars Program – Community Track, JLR by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS; award no. T32ES007018), and MN by a Royster Society fellowship and an EPA Science to Achieve Results fellowship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
1. Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, McQuillan G, McDougal LK, et al. (2008) Changes in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in the United States, 2001–2004. J Infect Dis 197: 1226–1234. [PubMed]
2. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339: 520–532. [PubMed]
3. Klein E, Smith DL, Laxminarayan R (2007) Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999–2005. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 1840–1846. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, et al. (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298: 1763–1771. [PubMed]
5. Chambers HF, Deleo FR (2009) Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 629–641. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Kluytmans-Vandenbergh MF, Kluytmans JA (2006) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current perspectives. Clin Microbiol Infect 12 Suppl 19–15. [PubMed]
7. Wu D, Wang Q, Yang Y, Geng W, Wang Q, et al. (2010) Epidemiology and molecular characteristics of community-associated methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from skin/soft tissue infections in a children’s hospital in Beijing, China. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 67: 1–8. [PubMed]
8. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, et al. (2005) The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 751–762. [PubMed]
9. Silbergeld EK, Davis M, Leibler JH, Peterson AE (2008) One reservoir: redefining the community origins of antimicrobial-resistant infections. Med Clin North Am 92: 1391–1407, xi. [PubMed]
10. Silbergeld EK, Graham J, Price LB (2008) Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu Rev Public Health 29: 151–169. [PubMed]
11. Fitzgerald JR (2012) Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat. Trends Microbiol 20: 192–198. [PubMed]
12. Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A (2005) Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 711–714. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Smith TC, Pearson N (2011) The emergence of Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11: 327–339. [PubMed]
14. Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, Kroeger JS, Tinkler GP, et al. (2009) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers. PLoS One 4: e4258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Statens Serum Institut, Danish Medicines Agency, National Veterinary Insitute, National Food Institute (2010) DANMAP 2010 - Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, food and humans in Denmark. Copenhagen: Danish Integrated Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring and Research Programme. Available: http://www.danmap.org/Downloads/Reports.aspx Accessed 2013 May 14.
16. van Cleef BA, Monnet DL, Voss A, Krziwanek K, Allerberger F, et al. (2011) Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in humans, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 502–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C (2007) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 255–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Wulf MW, Verduin CM, van Nes A, Huijsdens X, Voss A (2012) Infection and colonization with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 versus other MRSA in an area with a high density of pig farms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 61–65. [PubMed]
19. Osadebe LU, Hanson B, Smith TC, Heimer R (2013) Prevalence and characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus in Connecticut swine and swine farmers. Zoonoses Public Hlth. 60: 234–243. [PubMed]
20. Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, et al. (2012) Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host Adaptation and Emergence of Methicillin Resistance in Livestock. MBio 3: e00305–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Uhlemann AC, Porcella SF, Trivedi S, Sullivan SB, Hafer C, et al. (2012) Identification of a highly transmissible animal-independent Staphylococcus aureus ST398 clone with distinct genomic and cell adhesion properties. MBio 3: e00027–12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Sung JM, Lloyd DH, Lindsay JA (2008) Staphylococcus aureus host specificity: comparative genomics of human versus animal isolates by multi-strain microarray. Microbiology 154: 1949–1959. [PubMed]
23. Verkaik NJ, Benard M, Boelens HA, de Vogel CP, Nouwen JL, et al. (2011) Immune evasion cluster-positive bacteriophages are highly prevalent among human Staphylococcus aureus strains, but they are not essential in the first stages of nasal colonization. Clin Microbiol Infect 17: 343–348. [PubMed]
24. Lowder BV, Fitzgerald JR (2010) Human origin for avian pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence 1: 283–284. [PubMed]
25. Wing S (2002) Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production. Environ Health Perspect 110: 437–444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Poulsen AB, Skov R, Pallesen LV (2003) Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood cultures using the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 419–421. [PubMed]
27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2010) Performance standards for antimicrobial suscetibility testing; 20th information supplement (M100-S200). Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
28. Steward CD, Raney PM, Morrell AK, Williams PP, McDougal LK, et al. (2005) Testing for induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 43: 1716–1721. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; Approved Standard - Ninth Edition (M07-A9). Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
30. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, et al. (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 268–281. [PubMed]
31. Zerbino DR, Birney E (2008) Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18: 821–829. [PubMed]
32. Larsen J, Imanishi M, Hinjoy S, Tharavichitkul P, Duangsong K, et al. (2012) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST9 in pigs in Thailand. PLoS One 7: e31245. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Feil EJ, Li BC, Aanensen DM, Hanage WP, Spratt BG (2004) eBURST: inferring patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from multilocus sequence typing data. J Bacteriol 186: 1518–1530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG (2000) Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38: 1008–1015. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Greenland S (1990) Randomization, statistics, and causal inference. Epidemiology 1: 421–429. [PubMed]
36. Royall R (1986) Model robust confidence intervals using maximum likelihood estimators. Int Stat Rev 54: 221–226.
37. Fessler AT, Olde Riekerink RG, Rothkamp A, Kadlec K, Sampimon OC, et al. (2012) Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 obtained from humans and animals on dairy farms. Vet Microbiol 160: 77–84. [PubMed]
38. Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, Soares FV, Hallin M, Catry B, et al. .. (2013) Prevalence, risk factors and genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carried by humans and animals across livestock production sectors. J Antimicrob Chemother 10.1093/jac/dkt047. [PubMed]
39. Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MT, Larsen J, Stegger M, et al. (2013) Whole genome sequencing identifies zoonotic transmission of MRSA isolates with the novel mecA homologue mecC. EMBO Mol Med 5: 509–515. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Smith TC, Gebreyes WA, Abbey MJ, Harper AL, Forshey BM, et al. (2013) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs and farm workers on conventional and antibiotic-free swine farms in the USA. PLOS One 8: e63704. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Fluit AC (2012) Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 735–744. [PubMed]
42. Graveland H, Duim B, van Duijkeren E, Heederik D, Wagenaar JA (2011) Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals and humans. Int J Med Microbiol 301: 630–634. [PubMed]
43. van Cleef BA, Verkade EJ, Wulf MW, Buiting AG, Voss A, et al. (2010) Prevalence of livestock-associated MRSA in communities with high pig-densities in The Netherlands. PLoS One 5: e9385. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Uhlemann AC, Hanson BM, Rosenthal M, et al. (2012) Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398, New York and New Jersey, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 18: 700–702. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Cromwell GL (2001) Antimicrobial and promicrobial agents. In: J LA, L SL, editors. Swine nutrition. 2nd Edition Boca Raton: CRC Press. 401–426.
46. Feinman SE, Matheson JC (1978) Draft environmental impact statement subtherapeutic antibacterial agents in animal feeds. Rockville, Maryland: United States Food and Drug Administration, Bureau of Veterinary Medicine.
47. United States Food and Drug Administration (2011) Summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. Available: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/UCM338170.pdf.
48. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, et al. (2011) Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 52: e18–55. [PubMed]
49. Cuny C, Friedrich AW, Witte W (2012) Absence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC398 as a nasal colonizer of pigs raised in an alternative system. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 1296–1297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. European Food Safety Authority (2009) Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008, Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates; on request from the European Commission. European Food Safety Journal 7: 1376.
51. Allen HK, Looft T, Bayles DO, Humphrey S, Levine UY, et al. (2011) Antibiotics in feed induce prophages in swine fecal microbiomes. MBio 2: e00260–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. USDA (2007) United States Department of Agriculture Census of Agriculture. Available: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/
53. Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Heesterbeek H, Mevius D, van Duijkeren E, et al. (2010) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One 5: e10990. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Wing S, Cole D, Grant G (2000) Environmental injustice in North Carolina’s hog industry. Environ Health Perspect 108: 225–231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Davis MF, Iverson SA, Baron P, Vasse A, Silbergeld EK, et al. (2012) Household transmission of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other staphylococci. Lancet Infect Dis 12: 703–716. [PubMed]
56. Baptiste KE, Williams K, Willams NJ, Wattret A, Clegg PD, et al. (2005) Methicillin-resistant staphylococci in companion animals. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 1942–1944. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
57. Bramble M, Morris D, Tolomeo P, Lautenbach E (2011) Potential role of pet animals in household transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a narrative review. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 11: 617–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. USDA (2010) United States Department of Agriculture 2010 National Agricultural Statistics Service. Available: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.dojsessionid=F154BA78C7C50C021C8CA924EDB72FD5?documentID=1063.
59. USDOC (2010) United States Department of Commerce 2010 Current Population Survey. Available: http://www.census.gov/cps/
60. Rafee Y, Abdel-Haq N, Asmar B, Salimnia T, Pharm CV, et al. .. (2012) Increased prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in household contacts of children with community acquired disease. BMC Infect Dis 12 10.1186/1471-2334-12-45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Casey JA, Cosgrove SE, Stewart WF, Pollak J, Schwartz BS (2013) A population-based study of the epidemiology and clinical features of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Pennsylvania, 2001–2010. Epidemiol Infect 141: 1166–1179. [PubMed]
Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of
Public Library of Science