PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Phys Rev Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC Apr 26, 2014.
Published in final edited form as:
Published online Apr 25, 2013.
PMCID: PMC3696636
NIHMSID: NIHMS473811
Torque spectroscopy of DNA: base-pair stability, boundary effects, backbending, and breathing dynamics
Florian C. Oberstrass,1 Louis E. Fernandes,2 Paul Lebel,3 and Zev Bryant1,4*
1Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
2Program in Biophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
3Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
4Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: zevry/at/stanford.edu
Abstract
Changes in global DNA linking number can be accommodated by localized changes in helical structure. We have used single-molecule torque measurements to investigate sequence-specific strand separation and Z-DNA formation. By controlling the boundary conditions at the edges of sequences of interest, we have confirmed theoretical predictions of distinctive boundary-dependent backbending patterns in torque-twist relationships. Abrupt torque jumps are associated with the formation and collapse of DNA bubbles, permitting direct observations of DNA breathing dynamics.
Force spectroscopy of biomolecules has stimulated general insights into the thermodynamics of small systems [1], including experimental tests of results from nonequilibrium statistical mechanics [24] and theoretical investigations of ensemble inequivalence [57]. To enable analogous contributions from torque spectroscopy, we have recently introduced a high-resolution approach [8] for measuring the torsional response of short (20–100 bp) sequences of interest (SOI), building on previous torque measurements that revealed sequence-averaged properties of long (2–15 kilobasepair) duplexes [810]. Local sequence-specific responses to supercoiling are relevant to the regulation of biological processes such as transcription [11] and replication [12, 13]. The associated torque signatures [8] illustrate general features of finite systems with constrained extensive properties, analogous to an Ising model at fixed magnetization (IMFM) [14].
In our initial study [8], we measured torque signatures of left-handed Z-DNA formation in d(pGpC)n sequences and disruption of strand-strand interactions in mismatched duplexes. For all the sequences we analyzed, we found good agreement with a 1D theoretical treatment of cooperative transitions, in which each basepair can adopt two available helical states, and junctions are disfavored by a domain wall penalty J. However, we performed only limited tests of theoretical predictions; we were unable to study the biologically important phenomenon of localized AT-rich strand separation [12]; and we did not investigate reversible dynamics.
For the current study, we designed a new set of molecular constructs and characterized their responses using the “static RBT” [8, 15] method. We previously described two distinct methods for measuring torque-twist relationships [8]. Both methods are based on rotor bead tracking (RBT), in which a DNA molecule is stretched using a micron-scale magnetic bead as a force handle, and rotation is monitored using a submicron non-magnetic bead attached to the side of the DNA. In “dynamic RBT”, torque is measured via the angular velocity of a calibrated viscous load. In static RBT, a reference DNA segment is used as a calibrated torsional spring (Fig. 1a). We have chosen static RBT here because it allows the use of smaller rotational probes, improving torque resolution [8, 15].
FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Static RBT assay for high-resolution torque spectroscopy
Figure 1b shows the response of a 50 bp long GC-repeat (Z50), a representative SOI that we previously investigated extensively using dynamic RBT [8]. For small twisting deformations, the molecule shows linear torsional elasticity characteristic of standard right-handed B-form DNA. At high levels of underwinding, the torsional response switches to a second linear region; the negative shift along the twist axis is consistent with a transformation to left-handed Z-DNA. The intervening region shows a characteristic abrupt torque jump associated with formation of a Z-DNA domain, and a B-Z coexistence region in which the torque is approximately constant. As seen in our dynamic RBT experiments [8], the torque-twist relationship is well described by an Ising-type model (Supplementary Equations) whose parameters include the changes in twist Δθ0, free energy ΔG0, and torsional compliance Δct associated with the state transition for a single basepair. The best-fit values for these parameters and for the domain wall penalty J are in good agreement with our dynamic RBT results (SFig. S1 and STab. S1).
We analyzed boundary effects in order to design rigorous challenges of our previous model. In the Z50 construct described above, the SOI is embedded in a continuous sequence with flanking regions of low Z-propensity. Our corresponding model calculations make use of “fixed boundary conditions”: we assume that the bases adjacent to the edges of the SOI remain in B-form, and a domain wall penalty is assessed if a basepair at the edge of the SOI adopts the Z-DNA state. In an alternative scenario, under “free boundary conditions”, the SOI is considered to be uncoupled from its surroundings, and there is never a domain wall penalty assessed at either edge of the SOI. For a given parameter set, these two conditions can predict very different responses (Fig. 2).
FIG. 2
FIG. 2
Torque-twist signatures of free boundary conditions and the behavior of a 100% AT sequence
In our treatment of Z50 and in related physical models, domain wall penalties lead to “overshoot” features in plots of mean torque as a function of imposed twist. Under fixed boundary conditions, there is an abrupt torque jump at the beginning of the transition as an initial domain is formed (Fig. 1b, ,2a2a and SFig. S2). This domain then grows, and domain walls persist in the final all-Z configuration. In contrast, under free boundary conditions (Fig. 2b, c and SFig. S2) there are no domain wall penalties in the final configuration, and as a result there are two abrupt transitions: a torque “overshoot” as an initial nucleus is formed, followed later by an “undershoot” as the molecule abruptly transitions from partially converted to fully converted, ridding itself of domain walls. We previously presented the partition functions for both fixed and free boundary conditions [8]. We also described an experimental realization proposed to approximate free boundary conditions, in which atomic spacers placed at the edges of the SOI isolate the sequence from the surrounding DNA, while preserving a torsional constraint [8] (Tab. S3). However, we tested these atomic spacers only with short sequences that show two-state behavior, and did not discuss or investigate the “overshoot-undershoot” behavior described above.
We measured torque as a function of imposed twist for two new constructs in which a long SOI is flanked by atomic spacers. In Z50-2SP, the SOI is the 50 bp Z-forming GC-repeat studied earlier. In AAT120-2SP, we used a 120 bp AAT-repeat that we predicted would readily undergo strand separation. Both constructs show the predicted overshoot and undershoot features surrounding the torque plateau (Fig. 2d,e). Torque-twist plots collected for AAT120-2SP show no perceptible hysteresis under our conditions, and we have used averaged unwinding and rewinding curves for subsequent equilibrium analysis. For Z50-2SP, we observe some hysteresis, and have used rewinding curves as an approximation for equilibrium curves in subsequent analysis, as before [8].
To allow quantitative fits to torque-twist curves containing atomic spacers, we introduce a generalized model that includes “free” and “fixed” boundary conditions as special cases (Equation S13). We account for variable coupling with the surrounding DNA by including a parameter J’ that represents a penalty assessed for a domain wall that occurs at the edge of the SOI. This model reduces to fixed boundary conditions for J’ = J and to free boundary conditions for J’ = 0 (Fig. 3a, inset). By fitting the response of Z50-2SP using this model, we measure ΔG = 0.5 kcal/(mol bp), J = 5.6 kcal/mol, and Δθ0 = −1.1 rad/bp, agreeing well with fits to spacer-free Z50 (Fig. 3a and STab. S1). As expected, the edge-specific domain wall penalty was found to be low, J’ = 1 kcal/mol, supporting our proposal that atomic spacers create a close approximation to free boundary conditions. To further test this result and challenge our model, we constructed DNA tethers with a spacer on only one side of the SOI (Z50-1SP, Fig. 3b), and fit to a one-sided generalized model (Equation S14). Measurements closely match the predicted shape of the torque-twist relationship, and the parameters extracted from Z50-1SP data are in good agreement with Z50-2SP measurements, including J’ ≈ 1 kcal/mol (Fig. 3b and STab. S1).
FIG. 3
FIG. 3
The effect of boundary conditions on transitions in GC-repeats
We used the generalized model to extract thermodynamic and structural parameters from the AAT120-2SP data (Fig. 4b, STab. S1 and S2). For this equilibrium torque-twist curve, the best fit J’ = 0.5 kcal/mol reinforces our conclusion that atomic spacers efficiently abrogate coupling. The fit values Δθ0 = −0.6 rad/bp and ΔG = 0.6 kcal/(mol bp) are consistent with expectations for strand separation, based on (1) assuming complete loss of B-form helicity (B-form twist = 0.60 rad/bp) and (2) predicting the thermodynamic stability of AAT repeats from the unified view of polymer nearest-neighbor thermodynamics for strand separation [16] or more recent force spectroscopy analysis [17]. The best fit J = 7 kcal/mol provides a direct measurement of the domain wall penalty underlying the cooperativity of DNA melting, and is slightly larger than previous estimates based on thermal melting [18] and bulk topoisomer analysis [19, 20]. The AAT120-2SP measurements provide a model system for superhelically driven destabilization in AT-rich sequences, and are also directly relevant to the behavior of AAT triplet repeats in vivo; previous bulk measurements have shown that AAT repeats undergo helix opening in supercoiled plasmids [21]. Spacer-free AAT120 constructs more closely represent AT-rich sequences in their biological context; torque-twist plots for these constructs also show clear transitions, which display the fingerprint of fixed boundary conditions as expected (SFig. S5).
FIG. 4
FIG. 4
The effect of SOI length on transitions in AAT-repeats
As discussed, SOIs with large Ns under free boundary conditions show two abrupt torque jumps flanking a plateau. Lowering N is expected to shorten the transition plateau until the torque jumps merge into a single rip, approximating a two-state transition (Fig. 4a, SFig. S3 and S4). Measurements on AAT-repeats show the expected behavior. We tested AAT-repeats with a total of N = 50 (AAT50-2SP) and N = 21 (AAT21-2SP) basepairs (Fig. 4b and 4c). The measured torque response of AAT50-2SP and AAT21-2SP match our predictions and are consistent with parameters measured for AAT120-2SP (Fig. 4 and STab. S1).
Short-lived dynamic duplex opening (DNA “breathing”) has been studied because of its relevance to kinetic mechanisms of biological processes [22, 23]. AAT21-2SP exhibits 2-state behavior and shows reversible transitions under our conditions (Fig. 4c, ,5a5a and SFig. S4). We observe reversible hopping between the two states (strand-separated or “open” and B-form or “closed”) during twist ramps (Fig. 5a). Long observations at fixed twist show many reversible transitions and allow the measurement of state lifetimes for open and closed conformations. An increase in negative twist shifts the equilibrium from the closed to the open state (Fig. 5b,c and SFig. S6).
FIG. 5
FIG. 5
“Breathing” dynamics of 21 bp AAT-repeats
These features have been analyzed theoretically in the IMFM [14], which has been applied to diverse phenomena [24] including transitions of adatom clusters on a surface [25]. Torque overshoots in the fixed linking number ensemble have also been studied in the case of plectonemic buckling: abrupt torque jumps at this transition have been inferred to accompany abrupt extension jumps [26, 27]; they have been predicted from theory and simulation [27, 28], measured with the help of lock-in detection [29], and directly observed using dynamic RBT and electromagnetic torque tweezers [8, 30]. At the buckling transition, the free energy associated with forming a plectonemic end loop [28] plays a role analogous to the domain wall penalty J, adding an energetic cost to the initial formation of a plectonemic domain.
Local strand separation in superhelical DNA is critical for biological functions [22, 23, 31]. In this study, we have observed duplex opening dynamics and have also measured structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic parameters for strand separation alongside measurements of the competing [32] B-Z transition (STab. S2 and accompanying note). After parameterization with simple SOIs, our theoretical treatment of cooperative structural transitions can be extended to predict the torque responses of complex biological sequences.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the members of the Bryant group for useful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by a Pew Scholars Award and NIH grant OD004690 to ZB; by a Morgridge Family Stanford Graduate Fellowship to LEF; by a Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC PGS-D) award to PL; and by an EMBO long-term fellowship, a Stanford University Dean’s Fellowship, and a Swiss National Science Foundation fellowship for advanced researchers to FCO.
1. Mossa A, Huguet JM, Ritort F. Physica E-Low-Dimensional Systems & Nanostructures. 2010;42
2. Liphardt J, et al. Science. 2002;296
3. Collin D, et al. Nature. 2005;437 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Alemany A, et al. Nat Phys. 2012;8
5. Keller D, Swigon D, Bustamante C. Biophys J. 2003;84 [PubMed]
6. Sinha S, Samuel J. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005;71 [PubMed]
7. Suzen M, Sega M, Holm C. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009;79 [PubMed]
8. Oberstrass FC, Fernandes LE, Bryant Z. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109 [PubMed]
9. Bryant Z, et al. Nature. 2003;424
10. Sheinin MY, et al. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Vijayan V, Zuzow R, O'Shea EK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106 [PubMed]
12. Kowalski D, Natale DA, Eddy MJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85 [PubMed]
13. von Freiesleben U, Rasmussen KV. Res Microbiol. 1992;143 [PubMed]
14. Gulminelli F, et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003;68 [PubMed]
15. Bryant Z, Oberstrass FC, Basu A. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2012;22 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. SantaLucia J., Jr Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95 [PubMed]
17. Huguet JM, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107 [PubMed]
18. Amirikyan BR, Vologodskii AV, Lyubchenko Yu L. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981;9 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Benham CJ. J Mol Biol. 1992;225 [PubMed]
20. Bauer WR, Benham CJ. J Mol Biol. 1993;234 [PubMed]
21. Ohshima K, et al. J Biol Chem. 1996;271 [PubMed]
22. Krueger A, Protozanova E, Frank-Kamenetskii MD. Biophys J. 2006;90 [PubMed]
23. Ambjornsson T, et al. Biophys J. 2007;92 [PubMed]
24. Pleimling M, Huller A. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2001;104
25. Selke W, Müller T. Eur Phys J B. 1999;10
26. Forth S, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Brutzer H, et al. Biophys J. 2010;98 [PubMed]
28. Marko JF, Neukirch S. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012;85 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Daniels BC, et al. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009;80 [PubMed]
30. Janssen XJ, et al. Nano Lett. 2012 [PubMed]
31. Alexandrov BS, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Ditlevson JV, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36 [PMC free article] [PubMed]