|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Antibodies (Abs) against the V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein were initially considered to mediate only type-specific neutralization of T-cell-line-adapted viruses. However, recent data show that cross-neutralizing V3 Abs also exist, and primary isolates can be efficiently neutralized with anti-V3 monoclonal Abs (MAbs). The neutralizing activities of anti-V3 polyclonal Abs and MAbs may, however, be limited due to antigenic variations of the V3 region, a lack of V3 exposure on the surface of intact virions, or Ab specificity. For clarification of this issue, a panel of 32 human anti-V3 MAbs were screened for neutralization of an SF162-pseudotyped virus in a luciferase assay. MAbs selected with a V3 fusion protein whose V3 region mimics the conformation of the native virus were significantly more potent than MAbs selected with V3 peptides. Seven MAbs were further tested for neutralizing activity against 13 clade B viruses in a single-round peripheral blood mononuclear cell assay. While there was a spectrum of virus sensitivities to the anti-V3 MAbs observed, 12 of the 13 viruses were neutralized by one or more of the anti-V3 MAbs. MAb binding to intact virions correlated significantly with binding to solubilized gp120s and with the potency of neutralization. These results demonstrate that the V3 loop is accessible on the native virus envelope, that the strength of binding of anti-V3 Abs correlates with the potency of neutralization, that V3 epitopes may be shared rather than type specific, and that Abs against the V3 loop, particularly those targeting conformational epitopes, can mediate the neutralization of primary isolates.
The third variable domain (V3) of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 envelope glycoprotein is critical for the formation of syncytia and for virus entry into target cells (24, 55). These functions are mediated by the interaction of the V3 loop with chemokine receptors and are maintained despite the sequence variation that characterizes this region of the virus envelope (18, 51). Indeed, contrary to its name, the V3 loop is characterized by a constant size of 30 to 35 amino acids, a conserved type II β-turn at its tip, a disulfide bond at its base, and a net positive charge (26, 28). Conserved features are also suggested by the structure of the V3 loop discerned by nuclear magnetic resonance studies (47, 52), and conserved elements in the V3 crown and stem are mandatory features for coreceptor interactions (9, 50). All of these structural constraints appear to be imposed by the required interaction of the V3 loop with the coreceptors for HIV-1, CXCR4 or CCR5, and suggest that this region of the virus envelope should induce antibodies (Abs) that are cross-reactive among isolates and inhibitory to virus infectivity.
Initial studies of anti-V3 Abs, induced by brief immunization protocols in animals and tested against a limited number of T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains of the virus, suggested, however, that anti-V3 Abs were type specific and displayed little, if any, cross-reactivity (21, 39). In contrast, anti-V3 monoclonal Abs (MAbs) derived from the cells of HIV-infected subjects displayed broad reactivities with multiple V3 peptides (57) despite sequence diversity in the 11 amino acids spanning the region at the crown of the V3 loop (17). While these MAbs could potently neutralize TCLA strains, most of them displayed weak and sporadic neutralization against most primary isolates (12, 19, 33). Several studies suggested that this could be due to limited exposure of the V3 loop on the surfaces of primary isolates (3, 6, 49). However, studies examining the ability of anti-V3 MAbs to bind to intact virus particles showed that V3 exposure is the rule rather than the exception (34-36). More recent experiments with seven human anti-V3 MAbs and 11 primary isolates revealed a highly significant correlation between the affinity of binding of anti-V3 MAbs to primary isolates and neutralizing potency (15). Within this data set, however, there was significant variation, suggesting that additional factors contribute to the ability of a given Ab to neutralize a particular virus. Hence, it is still unclear how the presence and exposure of the V3 loop affect neutralization sensitivity and how the specificity of anti-V3 Abs contributes to this phenomenon. To address this question, we examined a panel of 32 human anti-V3 MAbs and 13 clade B viruses with diverse sensitivities to neutralization to determine the extent of anti-V3 cross-reactivity among clade B viruses and the nature of the association between virus binding and neutralization.
The 32 human anti-V3 MAbs used for this study, of which 26 were previously described (13-17) and 6 were newly generated, are listed in Table Table1.1. All of the MAbs were generated from HIV-infected individuals by the same cellular method based on the Epstein-Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) followed by fusion with heteromyeloma cells, as previously described (11, 16).
All but three MAbs, namely, 2182, 2557, and 2558, were derived from the cells of subjects from the United States who were presumably infected with clade B viruses. Human MAb 2182 was derived from a clade A virus-infected immigrant from China who is currently living in New York City (15), and MAbs 2557 and 2558 were produced from individuals who were infected with the CRF02_AG virus subtype and are living in Cameroon. The clade A and CRF02_AG env genes were identified by using a heteroduplex mobility assay and by sequencing, respectively (56). The irrelevant human MAb 1418 against parvovirus B19 was used as a negative control (10).
Thirteen HIV-1 clade B viruses were used for this study. The isolates IIIB, BaL, SF162, ADA, JR-CSF, JR-FL, US1, and 92US717 were supplied by the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program and Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Two primary isolates, P15 and P27 (42), were obtained from D. C. Montefiori, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. Three chimeric viruses were constructed by subcloning of the KpnI-to-BamHI fragments of the 89.6, aBL-01, and dBR-07 env genes into an NL4-3 plasmid and were provided by Dana Gabuzda, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass. (37). All HIV-1 isolates were expanded by two or three cycles of growth on phytohemagglutinin (PHA)- and interleukin-2-stimulated PBMCs, as described previously (29). A single batch of each of the 13 viruses was used for all of the binding and neutralization experiments reported herein to avoid alterations in env sequences due to multiple rounds of expansion.
The binding of MAbs to intact virions was determined with a capture assay as previously described (15). Briefly, a 96-well plate was coated overnight at 4°C with goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc Abs (ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, Ohio) at 2.0 μg/ml, and then human MAbs at a saturating level of 10 μg/ml were added for a 1.5-h incubation at 37°C. The plate was blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 10% goat serum and 10 μg of human IgG/ml. The culture supernatant, containing virions at a concentration of 100 ng of p24/ml, was incubated overnight on the plate at room temperature. Viruses captured by immobilized MAbs were lysed with 1% Triton-X in PBS. Between each step of the assay, the plate was washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4. The p24 in the virus lysate was quantified by using a noncommercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described previously (34). An irrelevant human MAb, 1418, was used as a negative control.
The relative affinity of MAb binding to intact virions was assessed with the virus capture assay by measuring the amount of MAb required for 50% maximal binding to virions. Plates coated with goat anti-human IgG Fc were incubated with human MAbs at concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 10.0 μg/ml, followed by the addition of supernatants containing intact virions according to the steps described above for the virus capture assay. The concentration of MAb (in micrograms per milliliter) that gave 50% maximal binding was calculated by linear interpolation with Quattro Pro software (Corel, Ottawa, Canada) when the binding reached the saturation level.
The binding of MAbs to soluble gp120 was determined by ELISA, as described previously (20). Briefly, ELISA plates were coated with sheep anti-C-terminus gp120 antibody (Cliniqa Corporation, Fallbrook, Calif.), followed by incubation with Triton X-100-treated virus preparations adjusted to a concentration of 100 ng of p24/ml. MAbs at a saturating level of 10 μg/ml were added in duplicate, and bound MAbs were detected by using alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-human IgG (γ specific) (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, Calif.). The color was developed by using an amplification system from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, Calif.), and the plates were read at 490 nm. The optical densities (ODs) were normalized to the value given with the negative control, MAb 1418, and are presented as indices (ratios of experimental ODs to mean OD with MAb 1418). Positive binding was defined by using a cutoff value which was calculated as the mean OD with MAb 1418 plus 3 standard deviations.
Pseudotyped virions expressing envelope glycoproteins derived from SF162 (psSF162) were constructed as described previously (15, 40). Briefly, plasmid pNL4-3.Luc.R−E− (5), supplied by the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, and plasmid pLRB826, expressing the env fragment from SF162 (25), were cotransfected into 293 cells by use of FuGENE6 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind.). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the pseudovirus-containing supernatants were harvested, filtered through a 45-μm-pore-size filter, and stored at −80°C. For measurement of the infectivity of the pseudovirus, a luminescence assay with HOS-CD4/CCR5 cells was used as previously described (15).
A single-cycle infectivity assay was used to measure the neutralization of SF162 pseudovirions as described previously (15). Briefly, MAbs at various concentrations and a pseudovirus suspension at a final concentration of 0.5 ng of p24/ml were preincubated for 1.5 h at 37°C. The virus-antibody mixtures were added to HOS-CD4/CCR5 cells (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) which had been seeded 1 day before at 6 × 103 cells per well in a 96-well plate. The cultures were incubated for 3 days at 37°C, washed with PBS, and lysed with lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, Wis.). The cell lysates were transferred to luminometer plates (Corning, Corning, N.Y.), and the luciferase activity (in relative light units) in each well was measured by using Luciferase Substrate (Promega) in a Lumimark Plus system microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). The reduction in infectivity was determined by a comparison of the relative light units in the presence and absence of MAbs and is expressed as percent neutralization.
Single-round PBMC assays were performed according to a previously described method (29). Briefly, each virus was incubated with each MAb at a final concentration of 50 μg/ml. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, 1.5 × 105 PHA-stimulated PBMCs were added to each well for 2 days. PBMCs were maintained in interleukin-2 medium containing the protease inhibitor indinavir. Cells were then fixed, permeabilized by use of a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD-Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.), stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-p24 MAb (KC57-RD1; Beckman Coulter), and analyzed in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson). Typically, 1 to 4% of the PBMCs in control wells were positive for p24 antigen, and 50,000 cells were counted. Data analysis was performed with FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, Calif.). The percent neutralization was defined as the reduction in the number of p24-positive cells in wells with MAb-treated virus compared with the number in control wells infected without MAb pretreatment. Positive neutralizing activities of the MAbs were determined by using a cutoff based on the 95% confidence level calculated from 13 negative control experiments using irrelevant human antiparvovirus MAb 1418.
t tests, Pearson correlation calculations, and linear regression analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism, version 3.00, for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.).
The 32 human anti-V3 MAbs listed in Table Table11 were used for this study. They can be divided into two groups, those which were generated by the selection of Ab-producing cells with V3 peptides and those selected with V3 fusion proteins (V3-FPs) or gp120. V3 peptides present only secondary structure, while both V3-FP and gp120 molecules retain the conformation of the V3 loop. All 32 MAbs were tested for binding to recombinant gp120SF162 by ELISA and for neutralization of the SF162-pseudotyped virus by a luciferase assay. Representative data from duplicate experiments are shown in Fig. Fig.11.
There was a distinct difference between the two sets of MAbs when neutralizing activities were compared. Taking the arbitrary, but commonly used, criterion of 50% neutralization, the results show that 11 of the 14 (78%) MAbs selected with either V3-FP or gp120 gave at least this level of neutralization at 1 μg/ml, while only 8 of the 18 (44%) MAbs selected with V3 peptides reached the same level of activity (Fig. (Fig.1A1A and C). Titration of the MAbs tested in the neutralization assays and a regression analysis of the data showed that the geometric mean 50% neutralizing dose for MAbs selected with V3-FP and gp120 (0.06 μg/ml) was significantly lower than that for MAbs selected with V3 peptides (0.40 μg/ml) (P = 0.0005) (Fig. (Fig.2A2A).
Similarly, the relative affinity was different between both groups of MAbs. The relative affinity was determined by measuring the MAb concentration required for 50% maximal (half-max) binding to recombinant gp120SF162. The lower the concentration of MAb needed to achieve half-max binding, the higher the relative affinity. As seen in Fig. Fig.1B1B and D and Fig. Fig.2B,2B, the geometric mean of the half-max binding values was lower for MAbs selected with V3-FP or gp120 (0.04 μg/ml) than for those selected with linear V3 peptides (0.32 μg/ml), with the difference being statistically significant (P = 0.0013).
These results demonstrate that MAbs selected with proteins retaining the V3 loop conformation have more neutralizing activity than those selected with peptides. This observation confirms the critical role played by the conformation of the V3 loop and the need for it to be recognized by Abs that bind avidly, leading to virus neutralization (15).
The experiments described above suggest that the neutralizing activities against psSF162 of the 32 MAbs tested correspond to binding activities for soluble gp120 of SF162. A regression analysis of the data showed a significant correlation between the percent neutralization determined with a MAb concentration of 1 μg/ml and the relative affinity of MAbs binding to monomeric gp120SF162 (P < 0.0001; Fig. Fig.3).3). This analysis indicates that the affinity of anti-V3 MAbs is an important factor in efficient neutralization of psSF162.
To extend these studies, we used seven MAbs, including six selected with V3-FP and the best of the MAbs selected with V3MN (MAb 447-52D), to determine the sensitivities of 13 clade B viruses to neutralization. Nine viruses were R5-tropic, one was X4-tropic, and three were dual-tropic; all were produced in PBMCs (Table (Table2).2). Human MAb 1418, specific for parvovirus B19, was used as a negative control. For a statistically derived rather than arbitrary value to allow comparative data analysis, significant neutralization was based on the 95% confidence level derived from data collected from 13 experiments with the latter MAb. This established neutralization of >18% as statistically significant.
Of 90 virus-MAb combinations (one combination, IIIB-2456, was not tested), 49 (54%) showed significant neutralization. Each combination was tested in two experiments, and the data from one of these are shown in Table Table2.2. The most cross-neutralizing MAb was 447-52D, which neutralized 12 of 13 viruses, although each of the other MAbs also neutralized 4 or more of the viruses tested. Thus, despite the sequence changes throughout the V3 loop in these viruses (Table (Table3),3), anti-V3 MAbs displayed extensive cross-neutralization of primary isolates.
The viruses tested were chosen to span the spectrum of neutralization sensitivities based on previous experiments, with BaL, SF162, and JR-CSF representing relatively sensitive viruses and ADA, dBR-07, and aBL-01 representing more resistant viruses. In fact, as shown in Table Table2,2, BaL, SF162, and JR-CSF were neutralized by all of the anti-V3 MAbs tested, while ADA and dBR-07 were neutralized by only one MAb and aBL-01 was not neutralized by any of the MAbs tested. The other seven viruses tested fell between the two extremes, being neutralized by two to six of the anti-V3 MAbs. These observations suggest that the V3 domain is functionally accessible in 12 of the 13 viruses tested.
As noted above, 54% of the MAb-virus combinations showed significant neutralization, with some viruses displaying considerably more neutralization sensitivity to anti-V3 MAbs than others. To examine the relationship between MAb binding to virions and neutralization, we performed studies to assess the abilities of MAbs to bind to intact virions. ELISA plates coated with each of the MAbs at concentrations ranging from 0.0001 to 10 μg/ml were used, and the quantity of virus bound was assessed by lysing the bound virus and measuring the levels of released p24, a technique previously used by us and others (2, 4, 34, 38). Representative binding curves for the 90 anti-V3 MAb-virus combinations are shown in Fig. Fig.44.
The binding curves of MAbs which do not neutralize each virus (as defined in Table Table2)2) are shown in blue and fall below those of MAbs with significant neutralizing activities (shown in red). These curves suggest that, in general, virus capture by anti-V3 MAbs corresponds to virus neutralization. A corollary of this is that those viruses whose V3 loops are most exposed and best recognized by anti-V3 Abs are most effectively neutralized by these MAbs.
The various viruses appear to display different thresholds for the level of anti-V3 MAb binding necessary to result in neutralization. Thus, the thresholds for SF162, BaL, and JR-CSF are very low, and consequently all anti-V3 MAbs that bind to them are neutralized. In contrast, viruses such as US1, JR-FL, IIIB, and 89.6 display thresholds below which binding does not result in neutralization. ADA and dBR-07 are distinct in that they are efficiently captured only by MAb 447, and this is the only MAb that is able to effect neutralization of these two viruses. In contrast, the capture of viruses P15, P27, and aBL-01 is relatively weak or at background levels, and neutralization of these viruses is likewise modest or, in the case of aBL-01, undetected.
Relative affinities were determined by measuring 50% maximal binding to intact virions; these values are shown in Fig. Fig.5.5. The lower the half-max value, the higher the relative affinity. The lowest mean relative affinities were for Bal, SF162, JR-CSF, US1, and JR-FL, the same viruses that are most effectively neutralized by the MAbs, again suggesting a correlation between binding and neutralization. A regression analysis showed that relative affinities (half-max values) indeed correlate significantly with percent neutralization (P < 0.0001) (Fig. (Fig.6A).6A). This analysis was confirmed when, instead of using half-max binding values, we assessed binding on the basis of virus captured by MAbs under conditions of saturation (10 μg of MAb/ml). Under these conditions, the amount of virus captured by the MAb again significantly correlated with virus neutralization (P < 0.0001) (Fig. (Fig.6B).6B). These data confirm and extend previous observations (15).
The lack of neutralization and binding to particular virions could be due either to the absence of the epitope or to its inaccessibility on the intact particles. To address this issue, we probed detergent-solubilized gp120 molecules from each virus with seven anti-V3 MAbs under saturating conditions (10 μg of MAb/ml) in order to determine the presence of V3 epitopes on the monomeric gp120 molecules. Representative results are shown in Table Table4.4. Each MAb-gp120 combination was tested twice, and MAb binding to soluble gp120 was expressed as an index in order to normalize the results, given the different amounts of gp120 in various virus preparations. Four observations emerged that were relevant to the antigenic variation of the V3 loop and its accessibility on virions to Abs. (i) The gp120s from all viruses tested, except dBR-07, possessed V3 epitopes that were recognized by one or more of the seven anti-V3 MAbs which were derived from individuals infected with heterologous viruses, and even, in the case of MAb 2182, with a virus from a heterologous clade (Table (Table4).4). (ii) For 44 of the 90 MAb-virus combinations, binding to soluble gp120 corresponded to neutralization (Tables (Tables22 and and4).4). (iii) For 38 of the 90 anti-V3 MAb-gp120 combinations tested (42%), there was no recognition of the epitope, attesting to the antigenic variation of the V3 loop. For 33 of these 38 combinations, the absence of binding to gp120 was associated, as expected, with the absence of neutralizing activity for the respective virus. In five of these cases, however, there was no detectable binding of the MAb to gp120, yet neutralization of the corresponding virus did occur (MAb 2182-SF162, MAb 2412-P15, MAb 2442-P15, MAb 2442-P27, and MAb 447-52D-dBR-07) (Tables (Tables22 and and4).4). In these cases, the MAb would have had to have bound to the virion, in which case binding might have been enhanced by oligomer formation (14) or by changes in the V3 conformation induced by binding to cell surface CD4 (30). (iv) For eight combinations, binding of a MAb to gp120 was noted but resulted in no neutralization, e.g., MAb 2219-P27, MAb 2412-US1, and others (Tables (Tables22 and and4).4). While representing only 9% of the combinations tested, these may represent instances in which the V3 loop is inaccessible on the virus particles, i.e., it is “cryptic.”
Interestingly, linear V3 sequences did not necessarily predict gp120 binding. For example, most MAbs bound strongly to BaL gp120 but not to ADA gp120, despite identical V3 sequences in these two viruses (Table (Table3).3). These data suggest that changes at distant sites in the envelope can affect the conformation and antigenic nature of the V3 loop, an observation which is supported by other work in the literature (32, 48, 54).
Generally, gp120 binding indices had the highest values for the neutralization-sensitive viruses BaL, SF162, JR-CSF, US1, JR-FL, and 92US717, while the binding indices were lower for the other viruses, which are less sensitive to neutralization. A regression analysis of the data revealed a significant correlation between MAb binding to soluble gp120 and intact virions at saturation, indicating that V3 epitopes present on monomeric gp120 are also present on intact virions and suggesting that their accessibilities to MAbs are similar in the monomeric and oligomeric states (P < 0.0001) (Fig. (Fig.7A).7A). Similarly, a significant correlation was found between MAb binding to soluble gp120 and percent neutralization (P < 0.0001) (Fig. (Fig.7B).7B). However, the regression data obscure the exceptions noted above, for which anti-V3 MAb binding to gp120 was noted with no consequent neutralization (8 of 90 combinations) and for which no anti-V3 MAb binding to gp120 was noted but neutralization occurred (5 of 90 combinations).
In this and previous publications, both polyclonal and monoclonal anti-V3 Abs have been shown to neutralize diverse primary isolates of HIV-1 (8, 15, 19, 25, 33), although not all viruses are neutralized by these reagents. The neutralizing activities of anti-V3 Abs may be limited due to antigenic variation of the V3 region, lack of V3 exposure on the surfaces of intact virions, and/or the nature of the Ab specificity. For clarification of this issue, a panel of 32 human anti-V3 MAbs were screened for binding to intact virions, for binding to solubilized gp120 from these viruses, and for neutralization. The results suggest that the V3 loop is similarly exposed on solubilized gp120 and on intact virions, that the V3 loop is accessible in all viruses studied, that the strength of binding of anti-V3 MAbs to intact virions correlates strongly with the potency of neutralizing activity, and that the V3 loops of diverse primary isolates display shared epitopes that can be recognized by anti-V3 MAbs with neutralizing activities.
For this study, the viruses that were selected represented a sampling within the spectrum of neutralization sensitivities and resistances. For example, BaL, SF162, and JR-CSF are well established as viruses that are sensitive to neutralization by various MAbs, including anti-V3 MAbs (29, 44). Other viruses, including ADA, P15, P27, aBL-01, and dBR-07, represent viruses that are relatively resistant to anti-V3 MAbs. The remaining viruses tested fall between these two extremes. The rationale for the use of these viruses was to determine if and how exposure of the V3 loop on the virus surface correlates with neutralization by anti-V3 MAbs. Binding studies revealed that the V3 loop was exposed in all viruses tested, since all could be captured with one or more of the anti-V3 MAbs studied. Each of these viruses, except aBL-01, was also neutralized by at least one MAb, and a highly significant correlation was found between strength of binding to intact virions and potency of neutralization (P < 0.0001) (Fig. (Fig.33 and and66).
While all of the viruses examined in this study displayed V3 on their surfaces, data shown above and published previously suggest that the degree of exposure differs with the virus and the conditions studied. Thus, by using saturating conditions in the virus binding assay, in which virions are captured on ELISA plates coated with 10 μg of MAb/ml, we noted large differences in the capture of different viruses. For example, on average, much more BaL was captured by the anti-V3 MAbs than 92US717 (Fig. (Fig.4).4). Nonetheless, the V3 epitopes seemed to be comparably recognized when these same MAbs reacted with the solubilized gp120s from these two viruses (Table (Table4).4). These data lead to the conclusions that the relevant V3 epitopes are present within the gp120s of these viruses but that the V3 loop is more accessible on the BaL virus than it is on the 92US717 virus. This view is supported by data in Fig. Fig.55 showing that the average half-max binding of the anti-V3 MAbs is much lower (i.e., the relative affinity is much higher) for BaL than it is for 92US717. Similarly, each MAb tested neutralized BaL more strongly than 92US717 (Table (Table2).2). These data reflect the differential exposure of the V3 loop on the intact virions of these two strains, and similar data in the cited tables and figures support the notion that V3 is differentially exposed by different strains of the virus. This concept is extended by data from other studies suggesting that some viruses apparently have cryptic V3 loops (3, 6, 49), although, from the data presented above, this appears to be the exception rather than the rule.
Sensitivity to anti-V3 Abs may also be affected by the mobility of the V3 loop upon interaction of gp120 with CD4. Thus, Mbah et al. (30) showed that, upon treatment with soluble CD4, the exposure of the V3 loop on virions of primary isolates is increased, but this occurs to different degrees with different viruses. Consequently, the sensitivity of viruses to anti-V3 Abs may also be affected by the mobility of the V3 loop during the conformational changes that occur in gp120 upon binding to CD4 (31, 43, 45, 49).
The relative affinities of anti-V3 MAbs were also found to play a profound role in the neutralization process. A highly significant correlation (P < 0.0001) was demonstrated between the percent neutralization of psSF162 tested in a luciferase assay and the half-max values for binding of 32 anti-V3 MAbs with this pseudovirus (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Similarly, a highly significant correlation (P < 0.0001) was found when the percent neutralization in a single-round PBMC assay and half-max virion binding values were analyzed for 90 MAb-virus combinations (Fig. (Fig.6).6). This extends earlier studies in which primary isolates from clades A to F were tested against seven human anti-V3 MAbs for MAb-virion binding and for neutralization (by the GHOST assay and the conventional PHA-blasted PBMC assay), and significant correlations were again found (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively) (15). Earlier studies, which were limited to neutralization of TCLA strains and binding to either monomeric gp120 or V3 peptides, also concluded that anti-V3 MAb affinity correlates with its neutralizing potency and further suggested that the dissociation rate (K−1) rather than the association rate (K1) is the principal component which determines neutralizing activity (27, 53). While Abs against other epitopes of the HIV envelope may not be constrained by the same affinity limitations (41), experiments in a multitude of systems consistently support the association between affinity and neutralization for anti-V3 Abs.
In summary, our data indicate that neutralization sensitivity to anti-V3 Abs appears to be affected by the presence or absence of the relevant epitope(s) on the virion envelope, the exposure of the V3 loop on the intact virion, the mobility of the V3 loop during the conformational change induced by CD4, and the affinity of the Ab. Additional factors influencing neutralization sensitivity are the density and/or number of Env oligomers on the surface of a given virus. All of these parameters contribute to the shape of the neutralization curve and the ultimate outcome of Ab-virus interactions. These multiple parameters, and most probably several others, contribute to the complex equation that determines neutralization sensitivity or resistance. Thus, viruses such as BaL, SF162, and JR-CSF, which according to the data shown in Fig. Fig.44 have a very low threshold for resisting Ab-mediated neutralization, appear to have well-exposed V3 loops for which the anti-V3 MAbs have high affinities (Fig. (Fig.5);5); in contrast, viruses such as BR07, ADA, and aBL01 have higher thresholds as a consequence, at least in part, of a poorly exposed V3 loop and low-affinity interactions with anti-V3 MAbs. The existence of a threshold was suggested previously in a study showing that anti-V3 MAb neutralization of TCLA HIV-1 was incremental rather than all or nothing and that each MAb binding an Env oligomer reduced infectivity (46). Recently, Franti et al. also described a threshold effect when studying the interaction between JF-CSF and the anti-gp120 MAbs b12, 447-52D, and 2G12 (M. Franti, S. Frost, M. Guyader, K. Delgado, D. R. Burton, and P. Poignard, Abstr. AIDS Vaccine 2003, abstr. 118, 2003). The data included in Fig. Fig.4,4, however, indicate for the first time that the levels of these thresholds will vary with each individual strain of virus.
The affinities of the anti-V3 MAbs tested here for psSF162 and 13 clade B viruses grown in PBMCs also varied by more than 3 orders of magnitude (Fig. (Fig.1,1, ,4,4, and and5);5); similarly, profound differences were described previously in the affinities of several of these MAbs for the V3-FP and V3 peptide of JR-CSF (15). Clearly, HIV-infected subjects make a broad range of anti-V3 Abs, both with respect to affinity and specificity (57). With the single, but important, exception of MAb 447, which was selected with the V3 peptide of MN, the most avid anti-V3 MAbs were selected with V3-FPs, which maintain the native conformation of the V3 loop (22). These data have important implications for vaccine design, as they establish the fact that the human Ab repertoire includes anti-V3 Abs with broad and potent cross-neutralizing activities and they identify the characteristics of the types of anti-V3 Abs which will have the greatest neutralizing efficacies and therefore the highest probabilities of blocking a virus inoculum. These characteristics include broad immunochemical cross-reactivity (Table (Table4)4) (35, 57), broad neutralizing activity (Table (Table2)2) (15), and a high affinity for gp120 and intact virus particles (Table (Table4)4) (15). Antigens used to select MAbs with these characteristics, such as V3-FP, provide a template for the design of immunogens that will focus the immune response on the V3 loop and should induce high-affinity, broadly reactive Abs to conformational epitopes on V3. The apparent requirement for conformational aspects of V3 revealed by our studies may also provide an explanation for the disappointing results with previously used V3 immunogens (1, 7, 23) which lacked the appropriate conformational aspects of the V3 loop.
This study was supported in part by grants from the NIH (HL59725, AI36085, and AI 47053) and the Immunology Core of the NYU Center for AIDS Research (NIH grant AI27742) and by research funds from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
We are grateful to Dana Gabuzda and David Montefiori for providing several HIV-1 isolates used in this study.