PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Am Coll Radiol. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jun 24, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3691108
NIHMSID: NIHMS473380
Cerebral Aneurysms
Janet C. Miller, DPhil, Joshua A. Hirsch, MD, Rivka A. Colon, MD, Ferdinando S. Buonanno, MD, James H. Thrall, MD, and Raul N. Uppot, MD
Janet C. Miller, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;
Joshua A. Hirsch, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114; jahirsch/at/partners.org
Data from autopsy studies indicate that 1% to 5% of adults have cerebral aneurysms [1]. Most are considered to be sporadically acquired, although the risk is higher if an individual has a family history of aneurysms or autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease [1]. About 27,000 cerebral aneurysms rupture each year in the United States. The peak incidence is at 55 to 60 years of age, with double the number occurring in women as in men. If an aneurysm ruptures, the effect is often devastating, with a 30-day mortality rate of 45% and 30% of survivors left with moderate to severe disability [1].
CT angiography (CTA) with postprocessing to create 3-D and maximum-intensity projection images is the noninvasive method of choice to detect an aneurysm (Figure 1). CTA has reported sensitivity and specificity of 77% to 97% and 87% to 100%, respectively, with lower sensitivity (40%–91%) for aneurysms <3 mm in size [1]. MR angiography (MRA) demonstrates comparable performance (sensitivity, 69%–99%; specificity, 100%) but requires longer table times than CTA [1]. Catheter angiography remains the gold standard but is more invasive and is associated with a small risk for neurologic complications [2].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coronal reformatted maximum-intensity projection image from CTA demonstrates a 1.1-cm bilobulated, saccular aneurysm (arrowhead) at the tip of the basilar artery (long arrow) with a 2-mm bleb in the superior aspect of the aneurysm. Bilateral posterior (more ...)
Most cerebral aneurysms are discovered when they rupture and result in subarachnoid hemorrhages [3]. Patients who survive long enough to reach hospitals present with symptoms ranging from “the worst headache of my life” to coma [1]. In cases of suspected aneurysm rupture, the best initial diagnostic imaging examination is noncontrast head CT [1]. If hemorrhage is diagnosed, CTA is then performed to detect and characterize the underlying aneurysm. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms are diagnosed most commonly as incidental findings or in patients who experience symptoms caused by the mass effect of the aneurysms, such as cranial nerve palsies [4].
The risk for rupture of an incidentally found aneurysm depends on its size, its location, and whether there has been a previous bleed from another aneurysm [5]. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms, which followed the natural history of aneurysms in 1,692 patients whose aneurysms were not repaired, reported that the risk for rupture of small aneurysms (<10 mm) in the anterior circulation during a 5-year observation period was extremely low for patients who had not experienced previous ruptured aneurysms. In patients who had experienced the rupture of other cerebral aneurysms, those of the same size (>10 mm) were about 11 times more likely to rupture [5].
In the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), the risks and benefits of surgical clipping and endovascular repair were compared in a group of patients who had experienced subarachnoid hemorrhages from ruptured aneurysms [6,7]. Patients whose treatment options included endovascular coiling and traditional surgical repair were randomized to either therapy. In these circumstances, endovascular coil treatment produced substantially better patient outcomes than surgery in terms of survival free of disability at 1 year, and the survival benefit continued for ≥7 years [7]. The relative risk for death or significant disability at 1 year for patients treated with coils was 22.6% lower than for surgically treated patients, an absolute risk reduction of 6.9% (P = .0019) [6,7]. The intraprocedural risks are also low (Table 1) [1]. Although traditional surgery and endovascular treatment have not been similarly compared in patients with unruptured aneurysms, endovascular repair is likely to convey less morbidity in this scenario as well.
Table 1
Table 1
Reported risk of endovascular coiling
At our institution, if a decision is made to repair an aneurysm neurosurgically, the anatomic information obtained from CTA is often considered sufficient for surgical planning [8]. If endovascular repair is selected (Figures 2 and and3),3), the procedure is carried out in a specialized neurointerventional radiology suite, equipped with a biplane x-ray machine with flat-panel fluoroscopes, allowing for high-speed rotational angiography and 3-D reconstructions of cerebrovascular anatomy. Under general anesthesia, a catheter is placed into an artery in the neck, through which a smaller microcatheter is passed intracranially into the aneurysm. This micro-catheter is used to deposit coils, one at a time, into the aneurysm until it is occluded. Depending on the anatomy of the aneurysm, adjunctive techniques such as balloon-assisted or stent-assisted coiling may be used.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Anteroposterior projection of a cerebral angiogram (A) demonstrates normal filling of the basilar and posterior cerebral arteries after deployment of two overlapping Neuroform stents (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts) (arrowheads). (more ...)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lateral views of a cerebral angiogram (A,B) demonstrate successful coil embolization of the basilar tip aneurysm (long arrows). The coil mass is draped over the contour of the stents, allowing for normal filling of the basilar (arrowhead) and posterior (more ...)
Depending on the acuity and specifics of the situation, patients may be treated with antiplatelet agents such as clopidogrel and aspirin. Additionally, both during and after the procedure, patients are typically given heparin to minimize the risk for thromboembolism and are transferred to the intensive care unit for close monitoring. After a routine elective procedure, patients remain in the hospital for 36 to 60 hours and are then seen in follow-up as outpatients.
A repeat procedure has been reported to be necessary more frequently after endovascular repair than surgical clipping. The risk from additional coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization [9]. In ISAT, 17.4% of patients required retreatment, about half within the first 30 days because of either failure to deploy the coils or incomplete occlusion. The remainder were retreated 3 to 80 months after the original procedures [10]. Follow-up imaging surveillance is therefore important to monitor the status of a repaired aneurysm. At this time, CTA, MRA, angiography, or radiography is recommended 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, and in some instances 10 years after endovascular repair.
UTILIZATION LESSONS
Endovascular repair (coiling) offers an alternate treatment to craniotomy and clipping in many cases. A multi-center randomized prospective clinical trial has demonstrated that endovascular repair results in significantly better outcomes in terms of morbidity and overall survival than conventional surgery in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms that were suitable for either treatment option. Compared with craniotomy and clipping, a higher proportion of patients treated with coiling will require repeat treatment.
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Head CT without contrast is recommended as the initial imaging study in patients with suspected ruptures of cerebral aneurysms.
  • CTA with 3-D and maximum--intensity projection images and MRA are the noninvasive methods for aneurysm detection and characterization. Although invasive catheter angiography remains the gold standard, CTA images are often sufficient for treatment planning with endovascular or conventional open surgical repair.
  • After endovascular repair, follow-up imaging is indicated because retreatment will be required in a proportion of these patients.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Raul G. Nogueira, MD, Department of Radiology and Department of Neurology, and Brijesh Mehta, MD, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, for providing the aneurysm case images and legends.
Contributor Information
Janet C. Miller, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joshua A. Hirsch, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rivka A. Colon, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ferdinando S. Buonanno, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
James H. Thrall, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Raul N. Uppot, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
1. Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:928–39. [PubMed]
2. Papke K, Brassel F. Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2051–66. [PubMed]
3. Johnston SC, Selvin S, Gress DR. The burden, trends, and demographics of mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology. 1998;50:1413–8. [PubMed]
4. Raps EC, Rogers JD, Galetta SL, et al. The clinical spectrum of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Arch Neurol. 1993;50:265–8. [PubMed]
5. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, III, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10. [PubMed]
6. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–74. [PubMed]
7. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366:809–17. [PubMed]
8. Hoh BL, Cheung AC, Rabinov JD, et al. Results of a prospective protocol of computed tomographic angiography in place of catheter angiography as the only diagnostic and pretreatment planning study for cerebral aneurysms by a combined neurovascular team. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1329–42. [PubMed]
9. Renowden SA, Koumellis P, Benes V, et al. Retreatment of previously embolized cerebral aneurysms: the risk of further coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1401–4. [PubMed]
10. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Stroke. 2007;38:1538–44. [PubMed]