Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of aemPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalAEM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 May; 79(10): 3185–3192.
PMCID: PMC3685249

Cooccurrence of Free-Living Amoebae and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Hospital Water Networks, and Preferential Growth of Mycobacterium avium in Acanthamoeba lenticulata


The incidence of lung and other diseases due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is increasing. NTM sources include potable water, especially in households where NTM populate pipes, taps, and showerheads. NTM share habitats with free-living amoebae (FLA) and can grow in FLA as parasites or as endosymbionts. FLA containing NTM may form cysts that protect mycobacteria from disinfectants and antibiotics. We first assessed the presence of FLA and NTM in water and biofilm samples collected from a hospital, confirming the high prevalence of NTM and FLA in potable water systems, particularly in biofilms. Acanthamoeba spp. (genotype T4) were mainly recovered (8/17), followed by Hartmannella vermiformis (7/17) as well as one isolate closely related to the genus Flamella and one isolate only distantly related to previously described species. Concerning mycobacteria, Mycobacterium gordonae was the most frequently found isolate (9/17), followed by Mycobacterium peregrinum (4/17), Mycobacterium chelonae (2/17), Mycobacterium mucogenicum (1/17), and Mycobacterium avium (1/17). The propensity of Mycobacterium avium hospital isolate H87 and M. avium collection strain 104 to survive and replicate within various FLA was also evaluated, demonstrating survival of both strains in all amoebal species tested but high replication rates only in Acanthamoeba lenticulata. As A. lenticulata was frequently recovered from environmental samples, including drinking water samples, these results could have important consequences for the ecology of M. avium in drinking water networks and the epidemiology of disease due to this species.


Lung disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is an increasingly important global health problem, with an estimated prevalence in the United States of 30 to 60 cases per 100,000 individuals (1). Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) organisms, including Mycobacterium intracellulare, are responsible for ~80% of NTM lung disease cases, characterized by bronchiectasis, nodules, and cavities (2). Chronic lung disease due to NTM is often recalcitrant to available therapy (3).

Free-living amoebae (FLA) are unicellular protozoa that are widely distributed in natural and human-made environments (46). FLA are ubiquitous phagocytes that can survive harsh conditions, partially due to the ability of many of them to switch from motile trophozoites to immobile cysts during starvation, desiccation, hypoxic conditions, and extreme temperature changes (7). During the trophozoite phase, FLA actively feed on bacteria, fungi, or algae. Although the general population is frequently exposed to FLA with no major health consequences (8), FLA can cause keratitis and devastating central nervous system disease (9).

FLA share many of the same aquatic niches as NTM and are abundant in soil, water, and biofilms (1012). A study examining a water treatment plant in France discovered that while purification reduced the number and types of FLA, these organisms survived all phases of the water sanitation process, including ozonation and chlorination (11). In a study comprised of 2,454 water and biofilm samples taken from 467 homes, 79% of the households contained FLA, with showerheads and kitchen sprayers being most likely to harbor FLA, mainly Acanthamoeba and Hartmannella species (13). Since cultivation on nonnutritive agar (NNA) plates covered with Escherichia coli was used in those studies, it is likely that many FLA species could not be recovered under these limited growth conditions.

NTM have also been frequently detected in water treatment lines and in water distribution systems (14). High concentrations of NTM have been found in the surrounding air and water of hot tubs and therapy pools, with one study from a U.S. hospital yielding an NTM prevalence of 72% (15). Numerous experimental studies have substantiated the ability of different NTM species to survive and grow in FLA, and in some cases, NTM are considered to be “endosymbionts” of FLA (10, 1619). Acanthamoeba polyphaga cysts have been shown to harbor MAC organisms, and the 11 MAC strains examined were culturable following excystment (20). Furthermore, Acanthamoeba cysts have been shown to resist inactivation by chlorine and other treatments used to sanitize drinking water (21) as well as to resist inactivation by glutaraldehyde and other disinfectants used in hospitals (22). Those studies suggested that encysted FLA may protect NTM from being killed during various disinfection processes (23). In addition, it was reported that Acanthamoeba castellanii can protect Mycobacterium avium from the effect of antibiotics, thus raising concern about the possible transmission of M. avium through this vector (24).

While the relationship between NTM and FLA has been described in the literature, and it is speculated that FLA contribute to the transmission and pathogenesis of diseases caused by NTM (17, 25), it remains unclear if NTM, particularly MAC organisms, can grow in any FLA frequently recovered from water networks, i.e., Acanthamoeba species that belong to the T4 and T5 genotypes based on 18S rRNA gene sequences and Hartmannella vermiformis. Here, we report the recovery, identification, and coincidence of FLA and NTM from biofilm and water samples collected at a U.S. medical center. We also examined differential growth patterns of M. avium in various environmental and laboratory strains of amoebae, including representatives of the genera Acanthamoeba, Hartmannella, and Naegleria.



Multiple areas of a U.S. medical center were sampled. The hospital water system was recirculating. At the heat source, hot water was measured at 50°C. The temperature of hot water in a building far from the heat source was measured at 42°C.


In order to focus on clinically relevant areas, we sampled showerheads and faucets in patient rooms, drinking fountains, the hospital therapy pool, and disinfection units used to sterilize bronchoscopes and endoscopes.

A total of 88 samples were collected, including 23 water samples and 65 biofilm samples. Four patient rooms were examined. For each one, we sampled the shower and sink by swabbing the interior surface of the showerhead and faucet as well as each drain. Additionally, we collected two 500-ml water samples in succession from each water source sampled. For the hospital therapy pool, we sampled five locations with water stagnation, including the tile floor surrounding the pool, two water filters, the pool water, and a water dispenser used to feed water into the pool. We also collected biofilm samples from two disinfection unit stations. We also sampled eight sinks used to rinse the medical equipment. In addition, we swabbed three containers holding an aldehyde-based disinfectant or enzymatic cleaner. We also swabbed the two tubings that deliver the formulations to the sink used for washing scopes. For each sampling location involving disinfection, 2 to 3 swabs were taken.

Sample collection.

Biofilms were sampled by swabbing the inside of the pipe with a sterile cotton-tipped applicator (CardinalHealth, McGaw Park, IL). After sampling, the entire applicator was placed into 5 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), kept at 4°C, and processed within 48 h for isolation of FLA and NTM.

For liquid samples, 1 liter of water was sampled from each faucet or shower that was swabbed. Water was also collected from drinking fountains, standing water in sinks, and a hospital therapy pool. Both hot and cold taps were turned on, and water was collected into two 500-ml sterile bottles. The temperature of one of the water samples was recorded immediately after sampling. After collection, all water samples were filtered through a 0.2-μm cellulose nitrate membrane (Sartorius AG, Germany). After filtration, the water was discarded, the filter was cut into pieces using an aseptic technique, and the pieces were suspended in 5 ml sterile PBS. Samples were processed within 48 h for isolation of FLA and NTM.

Recovery of cultivable FLA and cultivable NTM.

The swab and water suspensions were centrifuged at 800 × g for 10 min. Each pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of Page amoeba saline (PAS), and three 250-μl aliquots were spread onto three nonnutritive agar (NNA) plates plated with a lawn of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 for cultivation of indigenous amoebae. Supernatants were transferred into new sterile tubes and centrifuged at 2,800 × g for 30 min. New pellets were resuspended in 1 ml PAS before being processed to recover cultivable NTM (see below).

Identification of indigenous amoebae.

NNA plates were incubated at 28°C in a humidified atmosphere and examined daily for 12 days for the presence of amoebae. When positive, amoebae were subcultured on new NNA plates with E. coli to obtain clonal populations. After 3 subcultures, amoebae were harvested by scraping and resuspended in 1 ml of PAS. Ziehl-Nielsen staining was used to detect mycobacteria in indigenous FLA. To identify amoebae, DNA was extracted with the AquaPure Genomic DNA extraction kit and proteinase K (Bio-Rad), and partial 18S rRNA PCR and sequencing were performed with combinations of primers Ami6F1 and Ami9R or JDP1 and JDP2, as previously described (26, 27).

Coculture of environmental samples with an axenic FLA to recover NTM.

Axenic Acanthamoeba castellanii ATCC 30010 was inoculated with water and biofilm samples as described previously (11). On day 6, the amoebal cocultures (generation F0) were subcultured on fresh amoebae, and subcultures (generation F1) were incubated for 14 days at 32°C. Ziehl-Neelsen staining was systematically performed by taking 50 μl of cocultures F0 and F1 after 6 and 14 days of incubation, respectively. When acid-fast bacilli were detected, two 100-µl aliquots were seeded onto 7H10 agar and incubated for 2 months at 32°C or 37°C.

Identification of NTM to the species level.

Different strategies were used to identify mycobacterial isolates depending on their phenotypic characteristics after growth on 7H10 plates. All yellow isolates that developed rapidly on 7H10 plates (likely to be M. gordonae according to our experience [26]) were identified by using partial 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing with primers FD1 and Rp2 as well as internal primers (28, 29). All white-ivory isolates (more likely to be pathogenic isolates for which the 16S rRNA gene sequence sometimes fails to discriminate species, as described for Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium gastri) were identified by partial sequencing of the rpoB, secA, and hsp65 genes with primers based on published sequences (30, 31). Sequences were analyzed by comparison to known sequences in the nonredundant database at the NCBI website by using BLAST ( and creating CLUSTAL alignments ( The results of these two tests determined the identification of NTM to the species level.

Intra-amoebal growth of M. avium.

We examined the ability of clinically relevant M. avium strain 104 and M. avium hospital isolate H87 to infect, survive, and proliferate within seven distinct amoebal isolates. We used four Acanthamoeba strains that belong to the T4 genotype: A. castellanii ATCC 30010, A. castellanii ATCC 30234, A. polyphaga CCAP 1501/18 (identical to Linc-Ap1), and Acanthamoeba field isolate “H16,” which was isolated from a sink drain in a patient room during this study and was successfully cultivated in peptone-yeast extract-glucose (PYG) broth without bacteria. We also included A. lenticulata ATCC 30841 (genotype T5), H. vermiformis ATCC 50237, and Naegleria clarki CCAP 1518/15. Briefly, Acanthamoeba spp. were cultivated in PYG broth, whereas H. vermiformis and N. clarki were cultivated in ATCC 1034 culture medium and in modified Chang's medium, respectively (32). For infection experiments, amoebae were cultivated in sterile broth until they reached confluence. Subsequently, FLA were suspended in PAS buffer and adjusted to 7.5 × 105 amoebae/ml. Ten milliliters of this suspension plus 10 ml of sterile PAS buffer were distributed in a 150-cm2 cell culture flask and incubated at room temperature for 1 h for amoebae to adhere to the bottom of the flask.

To create fluorescently labeled mycobacteria, M. avium 104 and M. avium H87 were transformed with the red fluorescent protein variant mCherry by electroporation with the plasmid pCHERRY3 (33). This transformation was previously shown to have no effect on growth characteristics and virulence of mycobacteria (33). The two M. avium strains transformed with mCherry were cultivated for 10 days at 37°C on 7H10 plates with kanamycin (200 μg/ml). Several colonies were then collected in 10 ml PAS, sonicated for 3 min, and filtered with a 5-μm filter to remove aggregates. Optical densities were then adjusted to reach 3 × 108 bacteria/ml, and 250 μl was distributed into every flask to reach a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 bacteria per amoeba. Flasks were incubated overnight (16 h) at 28°C. The supernatant was then gently removed and replaced with PAS with 200 μg/ml amikacin. After incubation for 2 h at 28°C, the supernatant was gently removed and replaced with 12 ml sterile PAS, and amoebae were detached by tapping the flasks. The recovered suspension was centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in PAS to reach approximately 7.5 × 105 amoebae/ml. One milliliter of this suspension was distributed into 5 wells of a six-well plate and completed with 1 ml of a 1/5 dilution of PYG with 40 μg/ml amikacin, resulting in a final concentration of 1/10 PYG plus 20 μg/ml amikacin (verified to be bacteriostatic). At days 1, 2, 4, and 7 after infection, infected amoebae were collected by scraping the content of one well and then centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min and adjusted to 7.5 × 105 amoebae/ml in PAS. One hundred microliters (corresponding to 7.5 × 104 cells) was deposited into 4 wells of a sterile 96-well μ-Clean microplate and allowed to attach to the bottom of the wells for 1 h in the dark. mCherry fluorescence was then measured in each well by using a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech) (excitation, 584 nm; emission, 620 nm; 10 by 10 scanning mode; gain value, 4,000). After fluorescence reading, pictures were taken by using an IX71 inverted microscope equipped with fluorescence (Olympus), and microplates were stored at −80°C before CFU were counted.

For counting of CFU, contents of the 4 identical wells were thawed, pooled, and pelleted by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was suspended in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 2 h and vortexed 4 times for 30 s during incubation to release intra-amoebal bacteria. The suspension was then serially diluted on 7H10 plates that were incubated for 8 days at 37°C.

In a second series of experiments, we used fluorescence readings to measure the ability of M. avium H87 to survive and grow within the same amoebal species described above. We then tested survival and growth of M. avium 104 and M. avium H87 in 8 additional Acanthamoeba strains that all belonged to the T4 genotype (A. castellanii CCAP 1501/10 and 7 field isolates described previously [11, 26], all tested to be free of endosymbionts), 2 additional Naegleria strains (N. gruberi CCAP 1518/17 and an N. clarki field isolate), and H. vermiformis field isolate 172 (26).

Statistical analysis.

The mean numbers of mycobacterial strains isolated from amoeba-colonized samples were compared to the mean numbers of strains isolated from other samples by using the chi-square test (STATA software, version 7.0; Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). All infection experiments were repeated 3 times, and statistical analysis was performed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Amoebal sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KC669503 to KC669519. NTM sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KC669520 to KC669536 and KC669491 to KC669502.


Recovery of cultivable FLA from the hospital water system.

Of the 88 samples collected, 65 (73.9%) were swabbed (biofilm) samples and 23 (26.1%) were water samples. FLA were recovered from 13 of 88 (14.8%) hospital samples, mostly from biofilms. From the 13 samples containing cultivable amoebae, 17 distinct isolates were recovered. The majority of amoebae isolated were identified as Hartmannella sp. (n = 7/17; 41.2%) or Acanthamoeba sp. (n = 8/17; 47.1%) (Table 1). All Hartmannella isolates were assigned to the species H. vermiformis since 450- to 650-bp portions of their 18S rRNA gene sequences presented ≥98% identity with sequences of collection strains. Acanthamoeba isolates belonged mostly to genotype T4 (6/8 isolates); only two belonged to genotype T3. One of the genotype T4 isolates could then successfully be grown in PYG sterile broth without bacteria and was used in infection experiments. Another cultivable FLA recovered was closely related to the genus Flamella (100% identity with the 18S rRNA gene sequence of Flamella balnearia over 624 bp). The last isolate was distantly related to the genus Allovahlkampfia (92% identity with the 18S rRNA gene sequence of Allovahlkampfia spelaea). We did not observe bacteria that were positive by Ziehl-Neelsen staining in the indigenous FLA recovered from the hospital water system.

Table 1
List of samples from which amoebae and/or mycobacteria were isolateda

Cultivable NTM were more likely to be recovered from samples containing cultivable FLA.

Overall, 26 of the 88 environmental samples cultured with axenic A. castellanii stained positive for acid-fast bacteria. Of the positive samples, 15 (12 biofilm and 3 water samples) were culture positive for 17 identifiable NTM isolates (Table 1). Nine isolates were identified as M. gordonae, four were identified as M. peregrinum, two were identified as M. chelonae, one was identified as M. mucogenicum, and one was identified as M. avium. Of the 13 environmental samples from which cultivable FLA were recovered, NTM were isolated from 7 (53.8%), whereas of the 75 samples in which no FLA were found, NTM was isolated from 8 (10.7%). There was a statistically significant relation between the presence of cultivable mycobacteria and the presence of cultivable FLA (P < 0.001). NTM could not be isolated from the 11 remaining coculture samples positive for acid-fast bacilli. Of these, three were also positive for indigenous FLA. Acid-fast-positive but culture-negative samples included samples taken from patient rooms (sink water, sink, and shower drains), from the water fountain dispenser and drain, and from one sterilizer unit (including sink, enzymatic cleaner container, and disinfectant container).

Differential growth of M. avium in different isolates of FLA.

First, we compared two techniques for monitoring intracellular growth of M. avium 104 labeled with mCherry: measurement of fluorescence intensity and counting of CFU on 7H10 agar. There was marked variation in the number of mycobacteria recovered from A. lenticulata infected with M. avium 104 after 1 to 7 days compared to the number of mycobacteria recovered from different FLA isolates (Fig. 1). There was a good correlation (R2 = 0.74; P < 0.05) between the fluorescence intensity measurement and CFU counts (Fig. 2 and and3A).3A). A. lenticulata ATCC 30841 was more efficiently infected by M. avium 104 than the 6 other amoebal strains tested, resulting in approximately 25 intra-amoebal mycobacteria after 7 days of infection, whereas fewer than 2 mycobacteria/amoeba were counted for all other amoebal strains (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). This was confirmed by microscopic observation of infected amoebae. Microscopy revealed large clumps of fluorescent bacteria within A. lenticulata, whereas smaller clumps were seen within other Acanthamoeba spp. and H. vermiformis (Fig. 4). For N. clarki, only single, primarily extracellular bacilli were observed (Fig. 4). Of note, H. vermiformis tended to form cysts faster than Acanthamoeba and Naegleria spp. (Fig. 4E and andF),F), which could have a negative impact on intracellular replication of mycobacteria.

Fig 1
Number of M. avium 104 bacteria per amoeba recovered after lysis of infected amoebae and seeding of released bacteria on 7H10 plates. The following amoebal strains were infected: Naegleria clarki CCAP 1518/15 ([open diamond]), Hartmannella vermiformis ATCC ...
Fig 2
Correlation curve between fluorescence intensity data and CFU (R2 [logarithmic] = 0.74; P < 0.05).
Fig 3
Fluorescence of amoebal cells infected with M. avium 104 mCherry (A) or M. avium NJH 87 mCherry (B). The following amoebal strains were infected (from left to right): Naegleria clarki CCAP 1518/15 (□), Hartmannella vermiformis ATCC 50237 (An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zam9991043650005.jpg), ...
Fig 4
Amoebae infected with mCherry-transfected M. avium. A. lenticulata ATCC 30841 (A and B), Acanthamoeba H16S1 (C and D), H. vermiformis ATCC 50237 (E and F), and Naegleria clarki CCAP 1518/15 (G and H) were infected with M. avium H87 (left column) or M. ...

Similar results were obtained when measuring the fluorescence intensity of amoebae infected with M. avium field strain H87 (Fig. 3B). Additional infection experiments were performed to evaluate the capacity of both M. avium strains to infect other Acanthamoeba isolates, an N. clarki environmental isolate, N. gruberi CCAP 1518/17, and an H. vermiformis environmental isolate. None of these additional FLA strains yielded levels of mycobacterial replication similar to that observed for A. lenticulata, with all fluorescence measurement values staying at the same level during the course of infection, suggesting intracellular survival with low or no replication (data not shown).


In previous studies, Falkinham et al. examined the presence of MAC organisms and other NTM in biofilms and found that 69% of bacterial isolates found in the biofilms of drinking water distribution systems were acid fast (34). Of 450 acid-fast organisms isolated, 267 were species of Mycobacterium. The average concentration of mycobacteria within biofilms was 600 CFU/ml. However, levels as high as 2,850 CFU/ml were recovered (34). In a previous study of biofilm samples taken from showerheads across U.S. cities, rRNA gene sequencing revealed ~6,000 unique rRNA sequences, of which Mycobacterium was the most common genus, accounting for approximately one-third of all clones isolated (12). FLA also reside in household water systems and are known to be enriched in the presence of biofilms (35). The present study confirms that FLA and NTM are readily recovered from potable water sources, including hospital water systems (26). Overall, we recovered 17 cultivable FLA isolates and 17 cultivable NTM isolates from nearly all hospital areas sampled. The showers and sinks in patient rooms yielded the most FLA, NTM, or both, including the clinically relevant M. chelonae. Furthermore, samples containing cultivable FLA were significantly more likely to yield cultivable NTM. This supports the notion that FLA and NTM cohabitate in biofilms within plumbing systems that distribute potable water (6, 26). However, we did not detect NTM directly in FLA isolates cultivated from hospital water and biofilm samples, suggesting that colonization of cultivable FLA by NTM in these ecosystems is not particularly frequent. Instead, the presence of Acanthamoeba within the water system could potentiate saprozoic growth of NTM by releasing extracellular metabolites that can be used as nutrients by NTM (25). Alternatively, the method used to isolate FLA can also have a negative impact on recovery of intra-amoebal NTM since FLA develop relatively quickly on NNA plates with E. coli, and only small portions of the migration fronts are subcultivated for purification and identification of FLA. Infected amoebae initially present in the original sample might be lost during this process. In addition, it cannot be excluded that FLA that cannot be grown on NNA plates with E. coli were present in the samples that we analyzed and can support intracellular growth of cultivable (or noncultivable) NTM; these limitations have to be kept in mind when interpreting the results presented here.

There have been few studies that have investigated the relationship between M. avium and amoebae. Recently, Berry and colleagues (38) reported that amoebal strains (mostly of the T4 genotype) freshly isolated from the environment yielded fewer bacteria than laboratory strains when experimentally infected with M. avium 104. However, reported differences were low, with 6 to 10 bacteria/amoeba observed in the field isolate and 3 to 5 bacteria/amoeba in the laboratory isolate during the course of infection. We investigated the capacity of M. avium collection strain 104 and M. avium H87 recovered from the hospital water system to proliferate within a large number of amoebal strains, including H. vermiformis, which is frequently isolated from water networks but has never been tested for its ability to harbor NTM. Our results demonstrate that both M. avium isolates survive but do not proliferate in H. vermiformis and Naegleria. Interestingly, similar results were observed for the proliferation of M. avium isolates in other Acanthamoeba strains tested. The only exception was A. lenticulata, for which significant intracellular proliferation was observed. In addition, M. avium field strain H87 had a better capacity to invade Acanthamoeba spp. than the collection strain M. avium 104 (P < 0.05). This might be due to attenuated virulence of the laboratory strain since virulence correlates with the ability of M. avium strains to invade FLA (39). We believe that proliferation of M. avium in A. lenticulata may significantly impact the epidemiology of this pathogenic NTM in drinking water networks. Indeed, A. lenticulata, the only representative species of genotype T5, is frequently isolated from environmental and clinical samples. In a large study by Fuerst et al., A. lenticulata was the second most frequent species recovered from environmental samples after species of the T4 genotype (40). Half of the Acanthamoeba isolates recovered from rivers, canals, and lakes in Arizona were A. lenticulata (41). A. lenticulata has also been isolated from biofilm samples collected from hospitals and swimming pools in Brazil (42, 43) as well as soils and tap water samples in Florida (44). However, to our knowledge, the present study is the first examination of mycobacterial growth in A. lenticulata, with all other previous studies using species that belong to genotype T4: A. castellanii strains ATCC 30010 and ATCC 30234 or A. polyphaga LincAp-1 (10). Our results suggest that M. avium survives but does not replicate efficiently in these strains. Importantly, Carroll et al. demonstrated that fluorescence emitted by mycobacteria transformed with the plasmid pCHERRY3 is related directly to viability, thus ensuring that the measured fluorescence corresponds to living bacteria (33).

While no FLA were cultured from samples taken within a facility used to disinfect diagnostic medical equipment, 7 of these samples were positive for acid-fast organisms, likely indicating the presence of noncultivable NTM. This is troubling considering that bronchoscopes and endoscopes are cleaned within this facility and that tap water is used to rinse equipment following chemical disinfection. M. gordonae was cultured from a container used to store an enzymatic cleaner and the running water used to wash scopes. However, this isolate was fully inactivated (>5-log10 reduction) when exposed to diluted enzymatic cleaner for 24 h at room temperature (data not shown). Therefore, it is likely that the container's surface was contaminated by tap water containing M. gordonae and that the pure enzymatic cleaner stored in the container did not contain NTM. M. avium, which is one of the most common causes of NTM lung disease in the United States (3), was also isolated from the faucet in the cleaning facility. M. avium has been isolated from other hospital water networks as well as from household plumbing (36, 37).

Acanthamoeba lenticulata can have different susceptibilities to infection by various microorganisms compared to Acanthamoeba spp. that belong to genotype T4. For example, we recently demonstrated that Lausannevirus, a “giant” virus, infected and rapidly killed all Acanthamoeba isolates that belonged to the T4 genotype but not A. lenticulata (45). The same was demonstrated for Parachlamydia acanthamoeba strain Bn9, which could not infect two different A. lenticulata strains, whereas it efficiently infected nine Acanthamoeba strains that belonged to genotype T4 (46). These host selectivity aspects could dramatically impact the distribution of acanthamoebal genotypes in water networks and subsequently affect the proliferation of select mycobacterial species (45). We believe that these observations urge the need for additional experiments to understand the distribution of A. lenticulata in water networks. In addition, further studies should more extensively test the ability of A. lenticulata strains to harbor intracellular replication of M. avium and other pathogenic NTM. Mycobacterial strains modified with the plasmid pCHERRY3 will be very useful to reach these goals.


This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant AI089718.


Published ahead of print 8 March 2013


1. Prevots DR, Shaw PA, Strickland D, Jackson LA, Raebel MA, Blosky MA, Montes de Oca R, Shea YR, Seitz AE, Holland SM, Olivier KN. 2010. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 182:970–976 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Parrish SC, Myers J, Lazarus A. 2008. Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections in non-HIV patients. Postgrad. Med. 120:78–86 [PubMed]
3. Daley CL, Griffith DE. 2010. Pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 14:665–671 [PubMed]
4. Hoffmann R, Michel R. 2001. Distribution of free-living amoebae (FLA) during preparation and supply of drinking water. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 203:215–219 [PubMed]
5. Joslin CE, Tu EY, McMahon TT, Passaro DJ, Stayner LT, Sugar J. 2006. Epidemiological characteristics of a Chicago-area Acanthamoeba keratitis outbreak. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 142:212–217 [PubMed]
6. Marciano-Cabral F, Jamerson M, Kaneshiro ES. 2010. Free-living amoebae, Legionella and Mycobacterium in tap water supplied by a municipal drinking water utility in the USA. J. Water Health 8:71–82 [PubMed]
7. Khan NA. 2006. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 30:564–595 [PubMed]
8. Chappell CL, Wright JA, Coletta M, Newsome AL. 2001. Standardized method of measuring Acanthamoeba antibodies in sera from healthy human subjects. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 8:724–730 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Visvesvara GS. 2010. Free-living amebae as opportunistic agents of human disease. J. Neuroparasitol. 34:1001–1027
10. Thomas V, McDonnell G. 2007. Relationship between mycobacteria and amoebae: ecological and epidemiological concerns. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45:349–357 [PubMed]
11. Thomas V, Loret JF, Jousset M, Greub G. 2008. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoebae-resisting bacteria in a drinking water treatment plant. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2728–2745 [PubMed]
12. Feazel LM, Baumgartner LK, Peterson KL, Frank DN, Harris JK, Pace NR. 2009. Opportunistic pathogens enriched in showerhead biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:16393–16399 [PubMed]
13. Stockman LJ, Wright CJ, Visvesvara GS, Fields BS, Beach MJ. 2011. Prevalence of Acanthamoeba spp. and other free-living amoebae in household water, Ohio, USA—1990-1992. Parasitol. Res. 108:621–627 [PubMed]
14. Le Dantec C, Duguet JP, Montiel A, Dumoutier N, Dubrou S, Vincent V. 2002. Occurrence of mycobacteria in water treatment lines and in water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:5318–5325 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Glazer CS, Martyny JW, Lee B, Sanchez TL, Sells TM, Newman LS, Murphy J, Heifets L, Rose CS. 2007. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in aerosol droplets and bulk water samples from therapy pools and hot tubs. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 4:831–840 [PubMed]
16. Glaser KC, Hetrick ND, Molestina RE. 2011. Evidence for a previously unrecognized mycobacterial endosymbiont in Acanthamoeba castellanii strain Ma (ATCC 50370). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 58:75–76 [PubMed]
17. Iovieno A, Ledee DR, Miller D, Alfonso EC. 2010. Detection of bacterial endosymbionts in clinical Acanthamoeba isolates. Ophthalmology 117:445–452 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Drancourt M, Adekambi T, Raoult D. 2007. Interactions between Mycobacterium xenopi, amoeba and human cells. J. Hosp. Infect. 65:138–142 [PubMed]
19. Yu HS, Jeong HJ, Hong YC, Seol SY, Chung DI, Kong HH. 2007. Natural occurrence of Mycobacterium as an endosymbiont of Acanthamoeba isolated from a contact lens storage case. Korean J. Parasitol. 45:11–18 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ben Salah I, Drancourt M. 2010. Surviving within the amoebal exocyst: the Mycobacterium avium complex paradigm. BMC Microbiol. 10:99 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-99 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Thomas V, Bouchez T, Nicolas V, Robert S, Loret JF, Lévi Y. 2004. Amoebae in domestic water systems: resistance to disinfection treatments and implication in Legionella persistence. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:950–963 [PubMed]
22. Coulon C, Collignon A, McDonnell G, Thomas V. 2010. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection treatments used in health care settings. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:2689–2697 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Adekambi T, Ben Salah S, Khlif M, Raoult D, Drancourt M. 2006. Survival of environmental mycobacteria in Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5974–5981 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Miltner EC, Bermudez LE. 2000. Mycobacterium avium grown in Acanthamoeba castellanii is protected from the effects of antimicrobials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1990–1994 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Steinert M, Birkness K, White E, Fields B, Quinn F. 1998. Mycobacterium avium bacilli grow saprozoically in coculture with Acanthamoeba polyphaga and survive within cyst walls. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:2256–2261 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Thomas V, Herrera-Rimann K, Blanc DS, Greub G. 2006. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoeba-resisting bacteria in a hospital water network. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2428–2438 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Schroeder JM, Booton GC, Hay J, Niszl IA, Seal DV, Markus MB, Fuerst PA, Byers TJ. 2001. Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1903–1911 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Adekambi T, Drancourt M. 2004. Dissection of phylogenetic relationships among 19 rapidly growing Mycobacterium species by 16S rRNA, hsp65, sodA, recA and rpoB gene sequencing. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:2095–2105 [PubMed]
29. Woese CR. 1987. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51:221–271 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Adekambi T, Colson P, Drancourt M. 2003. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5699–5708 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Zelazny AM, Root JM, Shea YR, Colombo RE, Shamputa IC, Stock F, Conlan S, McNulty S, Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ, Jr, Olivier KN, Holland SM, Sampaio EP. 2009. Cohort study of molecular identification and typing of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium massiliense, and Mycobacterium bolletii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1985–1995 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. De Jonckheere J. 1977. Use of an axenic medium for differentiation between pathogenic and nonpathogenic Naegleria fowleri isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:751–757 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Carroll P, Schreuder LJ, Muwanguzi-Karugaba J, Wiles S, Robertson BD, Ripoll J, Ward TH, Bancroft GJ, Schaible UE, Parish T. 2010. Sensitive detection of gene expression in mycobacteria under replicating and non-replicating conditions using optimized far-red reporters. PLoS One 5:e9823 doi:0.1371/journal.pone.0009823 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Falkinham JO, III, Norton CD, LeChevallier MW. 2001. Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1225–1231 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Barbeau J, Buhler T. 2001. Biofilms augment the number of free-living amoebae in dental unit waterlines. Res. Microbiol. 152:753–760 [PubMed]
36. Falkinham JO., III 2010. Hospital water filters as a source of Mycobacterium avium complex. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:1198–1202 [PubMed]
37. Tichenor WS, Thurlow J, McNulty S, Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ, Jr, Falkinham JO., III 2012. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in household plumbing as possible cause of chronic rhinosinusitis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18:1612–1617 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Berry D, Horn M, Xi C, Raskin L. 2010. Mycobacterium avium infections of Acanthamoeba strains: host strain variability, grazing-acquired infections, and altered dynamics of inactivation with monochloramine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:6685–6688 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Danelishvili L, Wu M, Stang B, Harriff M, Cirillo S, Cirillo J, Bildfell R, Arbogast B, Bermudez LE. 2007. Identification of Mycobacterium avium pathogenicity island important for macrophage and amoeba infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:11038–11043 [PubMed]
40. Fuerst PA, Booton GC, Visvesvara GS, Byers TJ. 2003. Genotypic identification of non-keratitis infections caused by the opportunistically pathogenic ameba genus Acanthamoeba. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 50(Suppl):512–513 [PubMed]
41. De Jonckheere JF. 2007. Molecular identification of free-living amoebae of the Vahlkampfiidae and Acanthamoebidae isolated in Arizona (USA). Eur. J. Protistol. 43:9–15 [PubMed]
42. Carlesso AM, Artuso GL, Caumo K, Rott MB. 2010. Potentially pathogenic acanthamoeba isolated from a hospital in Brazil. Curr. Microbiol. 60:185–190 [PubMed]
43. Caumo K, Rott MB. 2011. Acanthamoeba T3, T4 and T5 in swimming-pool waters from Southern Brazil. Acta Trop. 117:233–235 [PubMed]
44. Booton GC, Rogerson A, Bonilla TD, Seal DV, Kelly DJ, Beattie TK, Tomlinson A, Lares-Villa F, Fuerst PA, Byers TJ. 2004. Molecular and physiological evaluation of subtropical environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba spp, causal agent of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J. Eukaryot.Microbiol. 51:192–200 [PubMed]
45. Thomas V, Bertelli C, Collyn F, Casson N, Telenti A, Goesmann A, Croxatto A, Greub G. 2011. Lausannevirus, a giant amoebal virus encoding histone doublets. Environ. Microbiol. 13:1454–1466 [PubMed]
46. Coulon C, Eterpi M, Greub G, Collignon A, McDonnell G, Thomas V. 2012. Amoebal host-range, host-free survival and disinfection susceptibility of environmental Chlamydiae as compared to Chlamydia trachomatis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 64:364–373 [PubMed]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)