PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2013 May 24; 288(21): 14681–14687.
Published online 2013 April 15. doi:  10.1074/jbc.C113.462770
PMCID: PMC3663493

Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Selectively Regulates the Stability of KDM4B/JMJD2B Histone Demethylase*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

The family of KDM4A-D histone demethylases selectively demethylates H3K9 and H3K36 and is implicated in key cellular processes including DNA damage response, transcription, cell cycle regulation, cellular differentiation, senescence, and carcinogenesis. Various human cancers exhibit elevated protein levels of KDM4A-D members, and their depletion impairs tumor formation, suggesting that their enhanced activity promotes carcinogenesis. However, the mechanisms regulating the KDM4 protein stability remain largely unknown. Here, we show that the molecular chaperon Hsp90 interacts with and stabilizes KDM4B protein. Pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 with geldanamycin resulted in ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of KDM4B, but not of KDM4C, suggesting that the turnover of these demethylases is regulated by distinct mechanisms. This degradation was accompanied by increased methylation of H3K9. We further show that KDM4B is ubiquitinated on lysines 337 and 562; simultaneous substitution of these residues to arginine suppressed the geldanamycin-induced degradation of KDM4B, suggesting that the ubiquitination of Lys-337 and Lys-562 targets KDM4B for proteasomal degradation upon Hsp90 inhibition. These findings constitute a novel pathway by which Hsp90 activity alters the histone code via regulation of KDM4B stability. This pathway may prove a druggable target for the treatment of tumors driven by enhanced KDM4B activity.

Keywords: Cancer, Histone Methylation, Histone Modification, Hsp90, Ubiquitination

Introduction

Histone methylation is a reversible and dynamically regulated process. Two classes of lysine demethylases have been discovered. The first consists of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) that demethylates lysine through an amine oxidative reaction (1). The second class includes the Jumonji C (JmjC) domain-containing proteins that demethylate lysine residues through a hydroxylation reaction. The JmjC catalytic domain forms an enzymatically active pocket that coordinates ferrous oxide and α-ketoglutarate co-factors and subsequently produces a highly reactive oxoferryl that hydroxylates the methylated lysine (2, 3). The human KDM4 family consists of four members: KDM4A, KDM4B, KDM4C, and KDM4D (also known as JMJD2A-D). These enzymes specifically catalyze the demethylation of H3K9me2/me3 and H3K36me2/me3 H1.4K26me2/me3 (47).

The KDM4 family is implicated in key cellular processes including transcription, DNA damage response, cell cycle regulation, cellular differentiation, senescence, and carcinogenesis (810). Members of this family are up-regulated in different types of human cancer, and their depletion impairs cancer cell proliferation and tumor formation, suggesting a causative role of KDM4A-D in promoting tumorigenesis (47, 1113). For instance, overactivity of KDM4B promotes gastric tumorigenesis (1417). Consistently, inactivation of KDM4B leads to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of gastric cell lines (18). Given that elevated levels of KDM4A-D promote carcinogenesis, it becomes essential to explore the mechanisms regulating the stability of KDM4A-D proteins. Recent studies identified several E3 ubiquitin ligases that regulate the stability of KDM4A-B proteins during cell cycle progression and in response to DNA damage (10, 19, 20).

Here, we reveal a previously unrecognized role of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)2 in regulating the stability of KDM4B protein. Inhibition of Hsp90 leads to ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of KDM4B protein. Moreover, we have identified two ubiquitinated lysine residues on KDM4B that are involved in the geldanamycin (GA)-induced degradation of KDM4B protein. Our results provide a new and attractive pathway for modulating KDM4B protein level in cancer cells by inhibiting the activity of Hsp90 molecular chaperone.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Plasmid Construction and Establishment of Stable Cell Lines

U2OS-TetON stable cell lines that conditionally express the following fusions: EGFP-KDM4B, EGFP-KDM4C, or EGFP fused to nuclear localization signal (EGFP-NLS) were established. Briefly, fragments including the above fusions were subcloned into pTRE2-puro. The resulting pTRE2-puro-Hs-KDM4B/C-EGFP or pTRE2-puro-EGFP-NLS vectors were transfected into U2OS-TetON cells. Puromycin-resistant clones (0.6 μg/ml puromycin) were selected and tested for doxycycline-induced expression of EGFP using fluorescence microscopy. Clones that showed EGFP expression only after the addition of 1 μm doxycycline were selected for further characterizations. All point mutations were introduced using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). All constructs used in this study were verified by restriction digestion and nucleotide sequencing.

Cell Lines and Growth Conditions

All cell lines were supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mm l-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. U2OS and 293T cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The MCF-7 cell line was grown in RPMI. U2OS-TetON cells were grown in the presence of 200 μg/ml Geneticin (G418). U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B and U2OS-TetON-EGFP-NLS were grown in the presence of 200 μg/ml G418 and 0.6 μg/ml puromycin. The U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4C cell line was maintained in 200 μg/ml G418 and 100 μg/ml hygromycin B.

Production of a Polyclonal Human KDM4B Antibody

KDM4B rabbit antibody (designated B2-201) was produced against KDM4B amino acids 528–727 fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST) using standard immunization protocol. The antigen was then immobilized on beads and used for affinity purification of the immune serum (Adar Biotech).

Immunofluorescence

Cells were grown on coverslips and immunostained as described previously (21). Anti-H3K9me3 (Abcam, Ab8988) primary antibody (1:1000) was visualized by Alexa Fluor 568 secondary antibody (Molecular Probes; 1:500). Images were acquired using an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM-700) with constant acquisition parameters across all the experiments.

Cell Transfections

Cell transfections with plasmid DNA or siRNA were performed using PolyJet (Bio-Consult) and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions. siRNA used in this study include Stealth KDM4B siRNA (Invitrogen) and Stealth RNAi negative control. All constructs and siRNA sequences are available upon request.

Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, and GFP-TRAP Pulldown

Protein lysates were prepared using two different methods. First, cells were lysed using standard Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (22). Second, protein lysates were prepared using hot lysis buffer (1% SDS, 5 mm EDTA, 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Lysate was boiled for 15 min, sonicated, treated with Benzonase for 30 min at room temperature, and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C, and then supernatant was subjected to immunoblotting using the following primary antibodies: anti-KDM4B (in-house, B2-201, 1:1000), anti-H3K9me3 (Abcam, Ab8988; 1:2000), anti-H3 (Abcam, ab1791; 1:2000), anti-Hsp90 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-13119; 1:1000), anti-GFP (Abcam, Abcam ab290; 1:2000), and anti-β-actin (Sigma, A5441; 1:20,000). The membranes were then washed and incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies anti-mouse(IgG)-HRP (Amersham Biosciences) or anti-rabbit(IgG)-HRP (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and developed using the Quantum ECL detection kit (Advansta).

Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (23). In brief, whole cell extracts were prepared using Nonidet P-40-lysis buffer, and 2–4 mg were precleared using protein G-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare). The precleared extracts were rotated at 4 °C overnight with 1–4 μg of antibody and protein G-Sepharose. Then, the immunocomplexes were washed five times and immunoblotted as described above. For the GFP-TRAP assay, protein lysates were precleared with agarose beads (Pierce; catalog number 26150) and incubated for 2 h with GFP-TRAP beads (ChromoTek). Next, the immunocomplexes were washed and analyzed by Western blotting.

Preparation of Protein Samples for Mass Spectrometric Analysis

Proteins extracts were resolved in a long gel using the PROTEAN® II xi cell system (Bio-Rad). The gel was run at 4 °C, at 18 V overnight, stained using InstantBlue (BioConsult) and destained with water. The bands of interest were excised from the gel and analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

KDM4B Histone Demethylase Interacts with Hsp90

To identify KDM4B-interacting proteins, we established a U2OS-TetON cell line that conditionally expresses functional EGFP-KDM4B upon the addition of doxycycline (dox) (hereafter called U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B). A control cell line expressing EGFP protein fused to nuclear localization signal (hereafter called U2OS-TetON-EGFP-NLS) was also established as described under “Experimental Procedures.”

To map KDM4B-interacting partners, GFP-TRAP pulldown assay was performed on dox-treated cells expressing either EGFP-KDM4B or EGFP-NLS fusion. The pulled down proteins were subjected to mass spectrometry. Results show several peptides of Hsp90α and Hsp90β isoforms that were co-purified with EGFP-KDM4B, but not with EGFP-NLS, indicating that KDM4B interacts with Hsp90 protein (Fig. 1A). KDM4B-Hsp90 interaction was further confirmed using GFP-TRAP pulldown of EGFP-KDM4B fusion (Fig. 1B).

FIGURE 1.
Pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 molecular chaperone promotes degradation of KDM4B, but not KDM4C, histone demethylase. A, LC-MS/MS analysis shows peptide sequences of Hsp90α and Hsp90β proteins that were co-purified with EGFP-KDM4B ...

Hsp90 Inhibition Promotes KDM4B Degradation and Alters the Methylation of H3K9

To study the biological relevance of Hsp90-KDM4B interaction, we pharmacologically inhibited the activity of Hsp90 using GA (24). U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B and U2OS-TetON-EGFP-NLS cell lines were treated with dox to induce the expression of EGFP-KDM4B and EGFP-NLS fusions. Cells were then treated with either DMSO or 5 μm GA for 5 h, fixed, and immunostained. Results show that GA treatment leads to a severe reduction in the fluorescence intensity of EGFP-KDM4B fusion. Interestingly, this reduction is accompanied by an increase in the levels of H3K9me3 as compared with the GA-untreated cells (Fig. 1C). On the other hand, no significant changes in the fluorescence intensity of the EGFP-NLS signal and in the levels of H3K9me3 were observed in U2OS-TetON-EGFP-NLS cells (Fig. 1D). Altogether, these observations suggest that the inhibition of Hsp90 activity impairs the stability of EGFP-KDM4B but not EGFP-NLS fusion.

To test whether the GA-dependent decrease in the fluorescence intensity results from the degradation of EGFP-KDM4B protein, cells expressing either EGFP-KDM4B or EGFP-NLS were treated with GA and subjected to Western blot. Results show that GA treatment leads to a rapid decrease (2–3-fold) in the levels of EGFP-KDM4B, but not in EGFP-NLS fusion. Consequently, the degradation of EGFP-KDM4B was accompanied by more than 3-fold increase in the levels of H3K9me3. On the other hand, no significant changes in the protein levels of histone H3 and β-actin were observed (Fig. 1E). Moreover, the levels of H3K9me3 were not affected in GA-treated TetON-EGFP-NLS cells (Fig. 1E). To further characterize the effect of GA on the stability of EGFP-KDM4B protein, we determined the half-life of EGFP-KDM4B protein using a cycloheximide chase assay in untreated and GA-treated cells. Results show that GA treatment shortens the half-life of EGFP-KDM4B to 30 min as compared with a half-life of 1 h in untreated cells (supplemental Fig. S1). This result further supports our conclusion that Hsp90 activity regulates the turnover of KDM4B protein.

To assess whether Hsp90 inhibition also affects the levels of the endogenous KDM4B protein, we raised polyclonal antibody (B2-201) against 528–727 amino acids of the human KDM4B protein. The antibody was affinity-purified and assessed for its ability to recognize the denatured form of KDM4B protein. To do so, whole cell lysate and GFP-TRAP immunoprecipitates of U2OS-TetON-EGFP-NLS and U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B cells were subjected to Western blot. Results show that the B2-201 antibody recognizes a major band of ~180 kDa, corresponding to the molecular mass of EGFP-KDM4B protein. This band is absent in cell lysates prepared from U2OS cells (supplemental Fig. S2A). Moreover, Western blot analysis of the MCF-7 cell line (human breast adenocarcinoma cell line that expresses high levels of the endogenous KDM4B protein) shows that KDM4B antibody recognizes a major band of ~120 kDa, corresponding to the molecular mass of the endogenous KDM4B. The intensity of this band was severely reduced in MCF-7 cells treated with either one of three different sequences of KDM4B siRNA (supplemental Fig. S2B). These results altogether confirm that B2-201antibody specifically recognizes both the overexpressed and the endogenous forms of KDM4B. Following this, protein lysates were prepared from untreated and GA-treated MCF-7 cells and analyzed by Western blot. Results demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 leads to degradation of the endogenous KDM4B protein, but has no detectable effect on the levels of β-actin (Fig. 1F). These observations suggest that KDM4B is a bona fide client protein of Hsp90 molecular chaperone.

Pharmacological Inhibition of Hsp90 Has No Effect on the Protein Levels of EGFP-KDM4C

We sought to assess whether similar to KDM4B, inhibition of Hsp90 activity affects the stability of the other members of KDM4 family. Toward this, we established a U2OS-TetON cell line that expresses functional EGFP-KDM4C fusion following the addition of dox (see “Experimental Procedures”). Interestingly, Western blot analysis shows that, unlike KDM4B, GA treatment has no significant effect on the levels of EGFP-KDM4C protein (Fig. 1G). Altogether, we concluded that Hsp90 regulates the stability of KDM4B, but not KDM4C, histone demethylase.

Ubiquitin-dependent Proteasomal Degradation of KDM4B Protein

To get further insights into the mechanism regulating the stability of KDM4B protein, we wanted to test whether the Hsp90-dependent degradation of KDM4B is mediated through the proteasome. Toward this, doxycycline-treated U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B cells were treated with either DMSO or proteasome inhibitor, MG132, prior to the addition of GA. As expected, chemical inhibition of Hsp90 leads to a rapid degradation of EGFP-KDM4B; however, this degradation is suppressed in MG132-treated cells (Fig. 2A). We concluded therefore that GA-dependent degradation of Hsp90 is mediated by the proteasome.

FIGURE 2.
Hsp90 inhibition induces ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of KDM4B protein. A shows that the Hsp90-dependent degradation of KDM4B is mediated by the proteasome. Dox-treated U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B cells were treated with either DMSO or 20 μ ...

To assess whether KDM4B is ubiquitinated prior to its degradation, protein lysates from U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B cells treated or not treated with either GA, MG132, or both were subjected to GFP-TRAP pulldown and immunoblotting. Results show that GA treatment leads to the rapid degradation of EGFP-KDM4B, and consequently, the ubiquitinated forms of the protein could not be detected (Fig. 2B, lane 3). On the other hand, cells treated with MG132 show a dramatic increase in the ubiquitinated forms of EGFP-KDM4B protein (Fig. 2B, lane 4). Moreover, pretreatment of the GA-treated cells with MG132 significantly restored the ubiquitinated forms of EGFP-KDM4B (Fig. 2B, lane 5). Collectively, we conclude that EGFP-KDM4B undergoes polyubiquitination prior to its proteasomal degradation.

Hsp90-dependent Degradation of KDM4B Protein Is Mediated by KDM4B Ubiquitination on Lys-337 and Lys-562

We sought to map the ubiquitinated residues of KDM4B protein. Toward this, EGFP-KDM4B protein was purified from U2OS-TetON-EGFP-KDM4B cells using GFP-TRAP and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis, which revealed two ubiquitinated lysine residues, Lys-337 and Lys-562 (data not shown). We substituted these two residues to arginine and assessed the demethylase activity of the observed KDM4B mutant in vivo. Results show that overexpression of the KDM4B mutant in U2OS cells leads to a dramatic decrease in the levels of the H3K9me3 mark as compared with untransfected U2OS cells. We therefore concluded that the demethylase activity of KDM4B-K337R-K562R mutant remains intact (supplemental Fig. S3). Next, we tested the ability of KDM4B mutant to undergo ubiquitination in cells. Toward this, 293T cells were transfected with an expression construct encoding FLAG-ubiquitin along with constructs expressing wild-type EGFP-KDM4B or EGFP-KDM4B-K337R-K562R mutant. Whole cell lysates were then prepared and subjected to GFP-TRAP pulldown followed by Western blot using FLAG, GFP, and ubiquitin antibodies. Results show that, in both the presence and the absence of MG132, the ubiquitination levels of KDM4B mutant are significantly lower than the wild-type protein, indicating that KDM4B is ubiquitinated on Lys-337 and Lys-562 residues (Fig. 2C). Prompted by these observations, we sought to assess whether the ubiquitination of Lys-337 and Lys-562 is implicated in GA-induced degradation of KDM4B protein. Toward this, U2OS cells expressing wild type or EGFP-KDM4B-K337R-K562R mutant were treated with either DMSO or GA and subjected to two assessments. Western blot showed no detectable changes in protein levels of EGFP-KDM4B-K337R-K562R mutant after GA treatment as compared with the substantial decrease in the levels of wild-type KDM4B protein (Fig. 2D). These observations were further confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis showing that, unlike cells expressing wild-type EGFP-KDM4B, the fluorescence intensity of cells expressing EGFP-KDM4B-K337R-K562R mutant remains unaffected following GA treatment (Fig. 2E). Altogether, these results strongly suggest that ubiquitination of Lys-337 and Lys-562 regulates the turnover of KDM4B protein following Hsp90 inhibition.

DISCUSSION

Here, we reveal a previously unrecognized role of Hsp90 molecular chaperone in regulating the stability of KDM4B, but not KDM4C protein. We have presented two lines of evidence suggesting that KDM4B is a client protein of Hsp90. First, KDM4B interacts with Hsp90 protein (Fig. 1, A and B), and second, inhibition of Hsp90 destabilizes KDM4B and leads to its degradation through the proteasome (Figs. 1 and and2).2). Moreover, we have identified two ubiquitinated lysine residues, Lys-337 and Lys-562, that mediate the Hsp90-dependent degradation of KDM4B protein. It has been shown that Hsp90 collaborates with Hsp70 for achieving the correct folding of their client proteins (25). Consistently, we found that KDM4B also interacts with Hsp70 (data not shown). On this basis, we propose that Hsp90 and Hsp70 molecular chaperones promote the folding of the nascent KDM4B polypeptide. Following Hsp90 inhibition, KDM4B remains unfolded and undergoes polyubiquitination and degradation through the proteasome.

Several studies have implicated Hsp90 in modulating the histone code and gene expression by chaperoning various chromatin remodeling factors (2629). Here, we show that the degradation of KDM4B protein is accompanied by an increase in the levels of H3K9me3. Thus, our results provide an additional pathway by which Hsp90 can affect the histone code through chaperoning KDM4B histone demethylase.

Several Hsp90 client proteins are known oncogenes (e.g. ErbB2, s-Src, b-Raf, and CDK4 (3033)). Moreover, Hsp90 regulates the stability of proteins that are involved in apoptotic pathways, such as p53 (34). Interestingly, cancer cells utilize the Hsp90 chaperone machinery to protect the mutated and the overexpressed oncoproteins from misfolding and degradation in the proteasome. For these reasons, Hsp90 is considered a promising and attractive target for treating cancer. Accordingly, several inhibitors of Hsp90 are being used in clinical trials to cure different types of human cancer (35, 36). Our data identified KDM4B as a new oncogenic client of Hsp90 and thus provided a novel pathway for destabilizing KDM4B in cancer cells. In light of this, we suggest that Hsp90 inhibitors might be effective to treat tumors driven by KDM4B overexpression through the inhibition of Hsp90 activity.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data:

Acknowledgments

We thank Yehuda G. Assaraf, Dan Cassel, and Michael Glickman for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Tamar Ziv for performing the mass spectrometry-related experiments. We thank Maayan Duvshani-Eshet and Nitzan Dahan for help in the microscopy experiments.

*This work was supported by grants from the Israel Cancer Research Fund (ICRF), Israel Science Foundation (ISF), Israel Cancer Association (ICA), H. Blechman Memorial Cancer Research Fund, and Eliyahu Pen Research Fund.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental Figs. S1–S3.

2The abbreviations used are:

Hsp90
heat shock protein 90
EGFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
NLS
nuclear localization signal
dox
doxycycline
GA
geldanamycin
DMSO
dimethyl sulfoxide.

REFERENCES

1. Shi Y., Lan F., Matson C., Mulligan P., Whetstine J. R., Cole P. A., Casero R. A., Shi Y. (2004) Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119, 941–953 [PubMed]
2. Shi Y., Whetstine J. R. (2007) Dynamic regulation of histone lysine methylation by demethylases. Mol. Cell 25, 1–14 [PubMed]
3. Tsukada Y., Fang J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Warren M. E., Borchers C. H., Tempst P., Zhang Y. (2006) Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 439, 811–816 [PubMed]
4. Fodor B. D., Kubicek S., Yonezawa M., O'Sullivan R. J., Sengupta R., Perez-Burgos L., Opravil S., Mechtler K., Schotta G., Jenuwein T. (2006) Jmjd2b antagonizes H3K9 trimethylation at pericentric heterochromatin in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 20, 1557–1562 [PubMed]
5. Cloos P. A., Christensen J., Agger K., Maiolica A., Rappsilber J., Antal T., Hansen K. H., Helin K. (2006) The putative oncogene GASC1 demethylates tri- and dimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3. Nature 442, 307–311 [PubMed]
6. Whetstine J. R., Nottke A., Lan F., Huarte M., Smolikov S., Chen Z., Spooner E., Li E., Zhang G., Colaiacovo M., Shi Y. (2006) Reversal of histone lysine trimethylation by the JMJD2 family of histone demethylases. Cell 125, 467–481 [PubMed]
7. Chen Z., Zang J., Whetstine J., Hong X., Davrazou F., Kutateladze T. G., Simpson M., Mao Q., Pan C. H., Dai S., Hagman J., Hansen K., Shi Y., Zhang G. (2006) Structural insights into histone demethylation by JMJD2 family members. Cell 125, 691–702 [PubMed]
8. Black J. C., Van Rechem C., Whetstine J. R. (2012) Histone lysine methylation dynamics: establishment, regulation, and biological impact. Mol Cell 48, 491–507 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Kooistra S. M., Helin K. (2012) Molecular mechanisms and potential functions of histone demethylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 297–311 [PubMed]
10. Mallette F. A., Mattiroli F., Cui G., Young L. C., Hendzel M. J., Mer G., Sixma T. K., Richard S. (2012) RNF8- and RNF168-dependent degradation of KDM4A/JMJD2A triggers 53BP1 recruitment to DNA damage sites. EMBO J. 31, 1865–1878 [PubMed]
11. Shin S., Janknecht R. (2007) Activation of androgen receptor by histone demethylases JMJD2A and JMJD2D. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 359, 742–746 [PubMed]
12. Klose R. J., Yamane K., Bae Y., Zhang D., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Wong J., Zhang Y. (2006) The transcriptional repressor JHDM3A demethylates trimethyl histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 36. Nature 442, 312–316 [PubMed]
13. Ishimura A., Terashima M., Kimura H., Akagi K., Suzuki Y., Sugano S., Suzuki T. (2009) Jmjd2c histone demethylase enhances the expression of Mdm2 oncogene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 389, 366–371 [PubMed]
14. Kawazu M., Saso K., Tong K. I., McQuire T., Goto K., Son D. O., Wakeham A., Miyagishi M., Mak T. W., Okada H. (2011) Histone demethylase JMJD2B functions as a co-factor of estrogen receptor in breast cancer proliferation and mammary gland development. PLoS One 6, e17830. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Northcott P. A., Nakahara Y., Wu X., Feuk L., Ellison D. W., Croul S., Mack S., Kongkham P. N., Peacock J., Dubuc A., Ra Y. S., Zilberberg K., McLeod J., Scherer S. W., Sunil Rao J., Eberhart C. G., Grajkowska W., Gillespie Y., Lach B., Grundy R., Pollack I. F., Hamilton R. L., Van Meter T., Carlotti C. G., Boop F., Bigner D., Gilbertson R. J., Rutka J. T., Taylor M. D. (2009) Multiple recurrent genetic events converge on control of histone lysine methylation in medulloblastoma. Nat. Genet. 41, 465–472 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Shi L., Sun L., Li Q., Liang J., Yu W., Yi X., Yang X., Li Y., Han X., Zhang Y., Xuan C., Yao Z., Shang Y. (2011) Histone demethylase JMJD2B coordinates H3K4/H3K9 methylation and promotes hormonally responsive breast carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 7541–7546 [PubMed]
17. Toyokawa G., Cho H. S., Iwai Y., Yoshimatsu M., Takawa M., Hayami S., Maejima K., Shimizu N., Tanaka H., Tsunoda T., Field H. I., Kelly J. D., Neal D. E., Ponder B. A., Maehara Y., Nakamura Y., Hamamoto R. (2011) The histone demethylase JMJD2B plays an essential role in human carcinogenesis through positive regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 6. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila.) 4, 2051–2061 [PubMed]
18. Li W., Zhao L., Zang W., Liu Z., Chen L., Liu T., Xu D., Jia J. (2011) Histone demethylase JMJD2B is required for tumor cell proliferation and survival and is overexpressed in gastric cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 416, 372–378 [PubMed]
19. Van Rechem C., Black J. C., Abbas T., Allen A., Rinehart C. A., Yuan G. C., Dutta A., Whetstine J. R. (2011) The SKP1-Cul1-F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 4 (SCF-FbxL4) ubiquitin ligase regulates lysine demethylase 4A (KDM4A)/Jumonji domain-containing 2A (JMJD2A) protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 30462–30470 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Tan M. K., Lim H. J., Harper J. W. (2011) SCF(FBXO22) regulates histone H3 lysine 9 and 36 methylation levels by targeting histone demethylase KDM4A for ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 3687–3699 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Ayoub N., Jeyasekharan A. D., Bernal J. A., Venkitaraman A. R. (2008) HP1-β mobilization promotes chromatin changes that initiate the DNA damage response. Nature 453, 682–686 [PubMed]
22. Ayoub N., Jeyasekharan A. D., Venkitaraman A. R. (2009) Mobilization and recruitment of HP1: a bimodal response to DNA breakage. Cell Cycle 8, 2945–2950 [PubMed]
23. Ayoub N., Rajendra E., Su X., Jeyasekharan A. D., Mahen R., Venkitaraman A. R. (2009) The carboxyl terminus of Brca2 links the disassembly of Rad51 complexes to mitotic entry. Curr. Biol. 19, 1075–1085 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Schulte T. W., Blagosklonny M. V., Ingui C., Neckers L. (1995) Disruption of the Raf-1-Hsp90 molecular complex results in destabilization of Raf-1 and loss of Raf-1-Ras association. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24585–24588 [PubMed]
25. Wegele H., Müller L., Buchner J. (2004) Hsp70 and Hsp90–a relay team for protein folding. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 151, 1–44 [PubMed]
26. Sawarkar R., Paro R. (2013) Hsp90@chromatin.nucleus: an emerging hub of a networker. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 193–201 [PubMed]
27. Ruden D. M., Lu X. (2008) Hsp90 affecting chromatin remodeling might explain transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in Drosophila. Curr. Genomics 9, 500–508 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Tariq M., Nussbaumer U., Chen Y., Beisel C., Paro R. (2009) Trithorax requires Hsp90 for maintenance of active chromatin at sites of gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 1157–1162 [PubMed]
29. Hamamoto R., Furukawa Y., Morita M., Iimura Y., Silva F. P., Li M., Yagyu R., Nakamura Y. (2004) SMYD3 encodes a histone methyltransferase involved in the proliferation of cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 731–740 [PubMed]
30. Citri A., Kochupurakkal B. S., Yarden Y. (2004) The Achilles heel of ErbB-2/HER2: regulation by the Hsp90 chaperone machine and potential for pharmacological intervention. Cell Cycle 3, 51–60 [PubMed]
31. Koga F., Xu W., Karpova T. S., McNally J. G., Baron R., Neckers L. (2006) Hsp90 inhibition transiently activates Src kinase and promotes Src-dependent Akt and Erk activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 11318–11322 [PubMed]
32. da Rocha Dias S., Friedlos F., Light Y., Springer C., Workman P., Marais R. (2005) Activated B-RAF is an Hsp90 client protein that is targeted by the anticancer drug 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin. Cancer Res. 65, 10686–10691 [PubMed]
33. Stepanova L., Leng X., Parker S. B., Harper J. W. (1996) Mammalian p50Cdc37 is a protein kinase-targeting subunit of Hsp90 that binds and stabilizes Cdk4. Genes Dev. 10, 1491–1502 [PubMed]
34. Nagata Y., Anan T., Yoshida T., Mizukami T., Taya Y., Fujiwara T., Kato H., Saya H., Nakao M. (1999) The stabilization mechanism of mutant-type p53 by impaired ubiquitination: the loss of wild-type p53 function and the hsp90 association. Oncogene 18, 6037–6049 [PubMed]
35. Holzbeierlein J. M., Windsperger A., Vielhauer G. (2010) Hsp90: a drug target? Curr. Oncol. Rep. 12, 95–101 [PubMed]
36. Trepel J., Mollapour M., Giaccone G., Neckers L. (2010) Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 537–549 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology