PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Neurosci Lett. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 10.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3662221
NIHMSID: NIHMS464961

Spinal neuronal plasticity is evident within 1 day after a painful cervical facet joint injury

Abstract

Excessive stretch of the cervical facet capsular ligament induces persistent pain and spinal plasticity at later time points. Yet, it is not known when such spinal modifications are initiated following this painful injury. This study investigates the development of hyperalgesia and neuronal hyperexcitability in the spinal cord after a facet joint injury. Behavioral sensitivity was measured in a model of painful C6/C7 facet joint injury in the rat, and neuronal hyperexcitability in the spinal cord was evaluated at 6 hours and 1 day after injury or a sham procedure, in separate groups. Extracellular recordings of C6/C7 dorsal horn neuronal activity (229 neurons) were used to quantify spontaneous and evoked firing. Rats exhibited no change in sensitivity to mechanical stimulation of the forepaw at 6 hours, but did exhibit increased sensitivity at 1 day after injury (p=0.012). At 6 hours, both spontaneous neuronal activity and firing evoked by light brushing, pinch, and von Frey filaments (1.4–26g) applied at the forepaw were not different between sham and injury. At 1 day, spontaneous firing was noted in a greater number of neurons after injury than sham (p<0.04). Evoked firing was also increased 1 day after injury compared to normal and sham (p<0.03). Dorsal horn hyperexcitability and increased spontaneous firing developed between 6 and 24 hours after painful facet injury, suggesting that the development of hyperalgesia parallels dorsal horn hyperexcitability following mechanical facet joint injury, and these spinal mechanisms are initiated as early as 1 day after injury.

Keywords: Facet joint, plasticity, neuronal hyperexcitability, hyperalgesia, whiplash

Introduction

Chronic pain affects an estimated 1/3 of adults in the United States, costing $635 billion annually [29]. In particular, chronic facet joint-mediated pain is prevalent in the lumbar and cervical spines [21,30]. The cervical facet joints are reported to be a source of pain in 54–60% of individuals with chronic pain from whiplash [19,21]. Although many cadaveric studies report abnormal motions of the cervical facet joints and capsule stretch during whiplash [1,26,33], the physiologic sequelae leading to chronic pain from that injury remain unclear.

The facet capsular ligament is innervated by proprioceptive and nociceptive mechanoreceptors with projections largely to the same spinal level as the facet from which they originate [2,23,25]. During facet capsule stretch, capsule afferents increase their firing rates with increases in applied capsule strain [2,20]. Increased peripheral neuronal input to the spinal cord can be sufficient to produce long-lasting central sensitization via increased excitability of dorsal horn spinal neurons, leading to hyperalgesia (increased pain sensitivity) and allodynia (painful response to normally non-noxious stimuli) that can be initiated as early as minutes or hours after the insult [13,28,34,35]. Central sensitization often involves wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons, a subpopulation of second-order cells found in the deep laminae (III–VI) of the dorsal horn [3,4]. Although central sensitization has been studied in several models of knee inflammation and temporomandibular joint pain [10,14,22], such models do not use mechanical injury. Transient mechanical facet joint trauma induces sustained behavioral sensitivity and neuronal hyperexcitability by 7 days [17,27]. Yet, it is not known how early such putative spinal changes develop after a mechanical facet injury and how the timing of the onset of spinal involvement relates to pain.

This study investigated the development of hyperalgesia and neuronal hyperexcitability in the spinal cord at either 6 hours or 1 day after a painful cervical facet capsule stretch. Extracellular potentials were recorded from the deep laminae of the dorsal horn at those times to assess spontaneous firing and evoked responses to peripheral mechanical stimuli. Because hyperalgesia is evident 1 day after facet injury [17], we hypothesized that dorsal horn neuronal firing also would increase by that time.

Methods

All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Pennsylvania IACUC and carried out under the guidelines of the Committee for Research and Ethical Issues of the International Association for the Study of Pain [37]. Male Holtzman rats (350–464g) were anesthetized with isoflurane (4% induction, 2–3% maintenance). A bilateral distraction of the C6/C7 facet joint was administered using a custom loading device as previously described [16]. The C6 vertebra was distracted 0.7mm rostrally to stretch the facet capsule across the joint (n=10 rats). A separate sham group (n=10) underwent surgical procedures identical to the stretch group, including mounting on the loading device, but no joint distraction. Post-operative handling was the same for all groups; after recovering from anesthesia rats were returned to their cages with free access to food and water until behavioral and electrophysiological testing at either 6 hours (n=4 injury, n=4 sham) or 1 day (n=6 injury, n=6 sham). Normal rats (n=6) were included for both assays as an additional control group.

Behavioral sensitivity in both forepaws was assessed preoperatively and at 6 hours or 1 day after injury. A series of von Frey filaments (1.4–26g) was applied in increasing order to the left and right forepaw to determine the filament at which a rat responded by withdrawing, licking, or shaking the forepaw [17].

Immediately after behavioral testing at the designated time point (6 hours or 1 day), rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (45mg/kg, i.p.) and given supplementary doses (5–10mg/kg, i.p.) as needed. The spinal cord was exposed bilaterally at C6/C7 and bathed in 37°C mineral oil. Rats were immobilized on a stereotaxic frame and core temperature was maintained at 35–37°C.

Extracellular potentials were recorded using a glass-insulated tungsten electrode (FHC), and signals were digitally sampled at 25kHz (Micro1401; CED). A micropositioner lowered the electrode to the deep laminae (III–IV) of the C6 and C7 dorsal horn; these laminae include WDR neurons that play a role in central sensitization [3,4,31]. Mechanosensitive neurons were identified by brushing the plantar surface of the forepaw. Stimuli were then applied to the forepaw at 30 second intervals, including a 2-second baseline period before each stimulus, 10 seconds of light brushing, 5 consecutive 1-second stimulations at 1-second intervals with von Frey filaments (1.4g, 4g, 10g, 26g), and 10 seconds of noxious pinch by a 60g vascular clip. After recordings were complete, rats were given an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (>100mg/kg) to terminate the non-survival procedure.

Voltage recordings from each neuron were spike-sorted using Spike2 (CED) to evaluate individual neurons. Baseline spontaneous activity was established by totaling the number of spikes in the 2-second baseline period. For brush and pinch stimuli, evoked spikes were summed over the 10 seconds of continuous stimulation. For von Frey stimuli, each filament had a total of 5 spike counts since each was applied to the forepaw 5 times. Baseline spike rates were subtracted for each stimulus to isolate the evoked response, and spike counts were log-transformed due to a positive skew in the distribution of spike totals.

Statistical analyses were performed using JMP9 (SAS) with α=0.05. A repeated-measures ANOVA compared withdrawal thresholds between groups at each time point. Pearson’s Chi-square test evaluated differences in the number of spontaneously firing cells in each group. Evoked responses were compared between sham, injury, and normal rats using an ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test. Neurons having evoked responses with studentized residuals greater than 2 were excluded from statistical analysis. Behavioral data are presented as mean±SD and spike counts as mean±SEM.

Results

Paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) at 6 hours was not changed from baseline (BL) for the injury group (9.0±4.3g BL; 10.2±3.4g at 6 hours) or the sham group (11.7±3.2g BL; 12.9±6.2g at 6 hours) (Figure 1). At 1 day, the sham group (13.4±7.9g) also was not changed from BL (12.8±10.4g); however, the PWT was significantly reduced (p=0.012) at 1 day after facet capsule injury (12.0±6.6g BL; 6.5±3.3g at 1 day) (Figure 1). The baseline PWT for each group was not different from the PWT (10.2±4.4g) measured in the normal rats (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) at baseline (BL) prior to surgery, and at either 6 hours or 1 day. The PWT at BL for each group was not different from normal. At 6 hours, PWT was not different from baseline in either group. PWT was significantly reduced ...

A total of 229 neurons (46±13 neurons/group) were recorded at an average depth of 636±170μm (Table 1), which includes laminae III–VI in the rat spinal cord [31]. Of the 229 neurons, 31 neurons were removed from analysis because their evoked responses had studentized residuals greater than 2 (6±4 neurons/group). Two groups of cells were classified based on spontaneous activity during the baseline period – quiescent neurons with no baseline firing (Figure 2a) and active neurons with baseline firing greater than 1 spike/sec (Figure 2b). Eighty percent of neurons in the normal group had no spontaneous firing and 5% were active. At 6 hours, the numbers of quiescent neurons (68% after injury, 64% after sham) and active neurons (24% after injury, 31% after sham) were not different from each other (Figure 2). At 1 day after injury the numbers of quiescent neurons (61% after injury, 81% after sham, p=0.04) and active neurons (27% after injury, 5% after sham, p=0.006) were significantly different (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Spontaneous firing in the spinal dorsal horn. Example recorded voltages from neurons with (a) no baseline firing and (b) baseline firing greater than 1 spike/sec. (c) The number of quiescent neurons (presented as percent of total neurons) was unchanged ...
Table 1
Total number of neurons recorded for each level of spinal cord.

Overall, evoked firing was elevated at 6 hours and 1 day after injury, but firing returned to normal levels in the sham group at 1 day (Figure 3). The evoked responses for light brushing and noxious pinch were not different between the 6 hour sham (107±15 spikes for brush, 78±15 spikes for pinch), 6 hour injury (91±12 spikes, 79±11 spikes), or 1 day injury (89±8 spikes, 77±15 spikes) groups, and each was also elevated over normal (48±4 spikes, 29±5 spikes) for both brush (p<0.003) and pinch (p<0.0001) (Figure 3a). The evoked response for the injury group at 1 day also was significantly higher than sham at 1 day (59±7 spikes, 32±5 spikes) for brush (p=0.003) and pinch (p=0.01) (Figure 3a). Evoked responses for the 4g, 10g, and 26g von Frey filaments were not different between either of the groups at 6 hours or the injury group at 1 day. However, for the 4g, 10g, and 26g filaments, each of the 6 hour sham, 6 hour injury, and 1 day injury groups exhibited significantly elevated firing over both 1 day sham (p<0.004) and normal (p<0.02) (Figure 3b). For the 1.4g filament, only the 6 hour sham and 1 day injury groups demonstrated evoked firing that was greater than 1 day after sham (p<0.03) and normal responses (p<0.007) (Figure 3b). There was no difference between normal firing and 1 day sham responses for any stimulus.

Figure 3
Evoked firing in the spinal dorsal horn. (a) Normal rats and those at 1 day after sham exhibited significantly lower evoked responses to light brush and noxious pinch than those at 1 day after injury (*p<0.014), while only normal rats were significantly ...

Discussion

Neuronal hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn develops within 1 day after a mechanical facet joint injury, corresponding to the development of behavioral sensitivity (Figures 13). Although neuronal hyperexcitability was evident at 1 day after painful facet injury, neither behavioral nor neuronal responses was different from sham at 6 hours after the injury. The hyperexcitability in dorsal horn neurons at 1 day was detected as an increase in both spontaneous and evoked firing (Figures 2 & 3). These results suggest that neuronal plasticity indicative of central sensitization develops early after facet joint injury and plays a role in the development of the behavioral sensitivity that persists at later time points in this model [17,27].

There were no behavioral or electrophysiological differences between the injury and sham groups at 6 hours. However, at 6 hours, 31% of neurons in sham rats and 24% in injured rats exhibited spontaneous firing greater than 1 spike/sec, similar to those percentages found at 1 day after injury (27%) (Figure 2). Both evoked and spontaneous firing were elevated over normal for both injury and sham at 6 hours, suggesting that afferent activity may be acutely potentiated by the surgical procedure without causing secondary behavioral sensitivity. However, the neurons largely return to normal activity levels over the following hours in sham controls while spontaneous activity and hyperexcitability persist after injury (Figures 2 & 3). Although it is possible that the studies performed at 6 hours may be affected by interactions between the anesthetics used for the initial surgery and electrophysiology procedures, the sham and normal groups control for these effects.

The development of mechanical hyperalgesia parallels the development of persistent spinal neuronal hyperexcitability. At 1 day after a painful injury, there was a significant decrease in PWT (Figure 1), which is consistent with other studies of behavioral sensitivity after painful facet capsule stretch [17,32]. In fact, here PWT was reduced to below the baseline 10–15g threshold in normal rats, suggesting the recruitment of typically non-nociceptive fibers and WDR neurons for nociception [15]. Consistent with clinical reports, mechanical hyperalgesia in this study was measured in the forepaw, a site remote from the injury but with afferents that terminate in the same dorsal horn regions as those from the C6/C7 facet joint [5,11]. Secondary hyperalgesia is commonly observed in centrally-mediated pain after whiplash and in central sensitization resulting from the potentiation of dorsal horn neurons that receive somatosensory and nociceptive input from both the primary injury and secondary sites [15].

Spontaneous activity in primary afferents is a potential mechanism for the initiation and long-term maintenance of central sensitization [6,15]. A greater percentage of dorsal horn neurons (27%) exhibited spontaneous firing greater than 1 spike/sec at 1 day after painful injury compared to sham (5%) and normal (5%) (Figure 2). This finding is supported by reports that up to 1/3 of primary sensory neurons develop spontaneous activity between 6 and 30 hours after peripheral nerve transection, in conjunction with the onset of tactile allodynia [6,7,24]. Although spontaneous Aδ- and C-fiber nociceptor activity and low-threshold A-beta fibers are proposed to drive central sensitization after injury [6,8,18], better classification of the primary neurons is necessary to determine which dorsal horn populations are involved in the hyperexcitability observed here. Of note, this painful facet joint model is a ligamentous injury, not an explicit nerve injury, though axonal swelling indicative of secondary axotomy has been noted in a caprine model after similar facet capsule stretch [12]. Nonetheless, taken together with the literature, the increased spontaneous activity in the spinal cord at 1 day after painful facet injury suggests that the etiology of pain and central sensitization following mechanical joint injury may be similar to peripheral neuropathic injuries.

Evoked activity was recorded from the same neurons in which spontaneous activity was quantified (Figure 3). There was a significantly greater evoked response to light brush and the 4g von Frey filament 1 day after injury, indicating allodynia since both are non-noxious stimuli in normal rats. These results, in conjunction with the increased spontaneous activity, suggest that low-threshold Aβ-fibers may have a role in the development of spinal hypersensitivity following facet injury. The evoked responses to noxious stimuli also were significantly greater 1 day after injury (Figure 3). The consistent increase in excitability across both non-noxious and noxious stimuli further supports the involvement of WDR neurons in the development of central sensitization after facet injury, because WDR neurons receive input from both types of afferents. The increases in evoked activity following both stimuli are consistent with the hyperexcitability observed later at 7 days after this facet capsule injury [27], suggesting that the mechanisms of neuronal plasticity associated with long-term development of central sensitization begin between 6 and 24 hours after facet injury. One potential mechanism may involve PKCε, a downstream regulator of the glutamatergic system, which is upregulated in the dorsal horn 1 day after this injury [9,36] and also regulates NMDA receptor potentiation, which is a key step in the induction and maintenance of sensitization [15].

This study suggests that dorsal horn hyperexcitability, a sign of central sensitization, develops very early after a persistent painful facet capsule injury, paralleling the onset of behavioral hypersensitivity. These findings suggest there is a critical and short time between injury and the development of persistent elevated spinal responses. This has importance in the design of more effective acute treatments for traumatic joint injuries, and provides a foundation for future studies to identify key regulators in pain following traumatic joint injury.

Highlights

  • Excessive cervical facet capsular ligament stretch induces persistent hyperalgesia.
  • It is unclear when spinal modifications are induced after painful joint injury.
  • Dorsal horn hyperexcitability develops between 6 and 24 hours after facet injury.
  • The development of mechanical hyperalgesia parallels spinal hyperexcitability.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (#AR056288 & BIRT Supplement), the Catharine D. Sharpe Foundation, and a Fellowship from the Ashton Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

1. Bogduk N, Yoganandan N. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 3: minor injuries. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:267–275. [PubMed]
2. Chen C, Lu Y, Kallakuri S, Patwardhan A, Cavanaugh JM. Distribution of A-delta and C-fiber receptors in the cervical facet joint capsule and their response to stretch. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1807–1816. [PubMed]
3. Christensen MD, Hulsebosch CE. Chronic central pain after spinal cord injury. Neurotrauma. 1997;14:517–537. [PubMed]
4. Coghill AC, Mayer DJ, Price DD. Wide dynamic range but not nociceptive-specific neurons encode multidimensional features of prolonged repetitive heat pain. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69:703–716. [PubMed]
5. Curatolo M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S. Evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications of central hypersensitivity in chronic after whiplash injury. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:469–476. [PubMed]
6. Devor M. Ectopic discharge in A-beta afferents as a source of neuropathic pain. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196:115–128. [PubMed]
7. Devor M. Response of nerves to injury in relation to neuropathic pain. In: McMahon SB, Koltzenburg M, editors. Wall and Melzack’s Textbook of Pain. Churchill Livingstone; London: 2005. pp. 905–927.
8. Djouhri L, Koutsikou S, Fang X, McMullan S, Lawson SN. Spontaneous pain, both neuropathic and inflammatory, is related to frequency of spontaneous firing in intact C-fiber nociceptors. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;26:1281–1292. [PubMed]
9. Dong L, Quindlen JC, Winkelstein BA. Whiplash-like facet joint loading initiates glutamatergic responses in the DRG and spinal cord associated with behavioral hypersensitivity. Brain Res. 2012;21:51–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Hathaway CB, Hu JW, Bereiter DA. Distribution of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the caudal brainstem of the rat following noxious chemical stimulation of the temporomandibular joint. J Comp Neurol. 1995;356:444–456. [PubMed]
11. Herren-Gerber R, Weiss S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S, Di Stefano G, Radanov B, Curatolo M. Modulation of central hypersensitivity by nociceptive input in chronic pain after whiplash injury. Pain. 2004;5:366–376. [PubMed]
12. Kallakuri S, Singh A, Lu Y, Chen C, Patwardhan A, Cavanaugh JM. Tensile stretching of cervical facet joint capsule and related axonal changes. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:556–563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Koltzenburg M, Lundberg LE, Torebjork HE. Dynamic and static components of mechanical hyperalgesia in human hairy skin. Pain. 1992;51:207–219. [PubMed]
14. Lam DK, Sessle BJ, Hu JW. Surgical incision can alter capsaicin-induced central sensitization in rat brainstem nociceptive neurons. Neuroscience. 2008;156:737–747. [PubMed]
15. Latremoliere CJ, Woolf Central sensitization: A generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009;10:895–926. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Lee KE, Thinnes JH, Gokhin DS, Winkelstein BA. A novel rodent neck pain model of facet-mediated behavioral hypersensitivity: implications for persistent pain and whiplash injury. J Neurosci Meth. 2008;137:151–159. [PubMed]
17. Lee KE, Winkelstein BA. Joint distraction magnitude is associated with different behavioral outcomes and substance P levels for cervical facet joint loading in the rat. J Pain. 2009;10:436–445. [PubMed]
18. Liu C, Wall PD, Ben-Dor E, Michaelis M, Amir R, Devor M. Tactile allodynia in the absence of C-fiber activation: Altered firing properties of DRG neurons following spinal nerve injury. Pain. 2000;85:503–521. [PubMed]
19. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, Bogduk N. Chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash: A placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine. 1996;21:1737–1744. [PubMed]
20. Lu Y, Chen C, Kallakuri S, Patwardhan A, Cavanaugh JM. Neural response of cervical facet joint capsule to stretch: A study of whiplash pain mechanisms. Stapp Car Crash J. 2005;49:49–65. [PubMed]
21. Manchikanti L, Boswell M, Singh V, Pampati V, Damron K, Beyer C. Prevalence of facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2004;5:15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Martindale JC, Wilson AW, Reeve AJ, Chessell IP, Headley PM. Chronic secondary hypersensitivity of dorsal horn neurons following inflammation of the knee joint. Pain. 2007;133:79–86. [PubMed]
23. McLain RF. Mechanoreceptor endings in cervical facet joints. Iowa Orthopaedic J. 1993;13:149–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Michaelis M, Blenk K, Janig W, Vogel C. Development of spontaneous activity and mechanosensitivity in axotomized afferent nerve fibers during the first hours after nerve transection in rats. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:1020–1027. [PubMed]
25. Ohtori S, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yamagata M, Sameda H, Moriya H. Sensory innervation of the cervical facet joints in rats. Spine. 2001;26:147–150. [PubMed]
26. Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Grauer J, Vahldiek M. Capsular ligament stretches during in vitro whiplash simulations. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:227–232. [PubMed]
27. Quinn KP, Dong L, Golder FJ, Winkelstein BA. Neuronal hyperexcitability in the dorsal horn after painful facet joint injury. Pain. 2010;151:414–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Ren K, Dubner R. Central nervous system plasticity and persistent pain. J Orofac Pain. 1998;13:155–163. [PubMed]
29. Roehr B. New Report Details Uphill Battle to Solve the U.S.’s Pain Problem. Scientific American. 2011 Jul;
30. Schwarzer AC, Wang SC, Bogduk N, McNaught PJ, Laurent R. Prevalence and clinical features of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain: A study in an Australian population with chronic low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54:100–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Watson C, Paxinos G, Kayalioglu G, Heise C. Atlas of the rat spinal cord. In: Watson C, Paxinos G, Kayalioglu G, editors. The Spinal Cord. Academic Press; London: 2009. pp. 238–306.
32. Weisshaar CL, Dong L, Bowman AS, Perez FM, Guarino BB, Sweitzer SM, Winkelstein BA. Metabotropic glutamate receptor-5 and protein kinase C-epsilon increase in dorsal root ganglion neurons and spinal glial activation in an adolescent rat model of painful neck injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2261–2271. [PubMed]
33. Winkelstein BA, Nightingale RW, Richardson WJ, Myers BS. The cervical facet capsule and its role in whiplash injury. Spine. 2005;25:1238–1246. [PubMed]
34. Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983;306:686–688. [PubMed]
35. Xie W, Strong JA, Meij JTA, Zhang J, Yu L. Neuropathic pain: Early spontaneous afferent activity is the trigger. Pain. 2005;116:243–256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Xu T, Jiang W, Du D, Xu Y, Hu Q, Shen Q. Role of spinal metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 in the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception in rat. Neurosci Lett. 2007;420:155–159. [PubMed]
37. Zimmerman M. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain. 1983;16:109–110. [PubMed]