PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cell Stem Cell. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 May 13.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3652251
NIHMSID: NIHMS461047

Endogenous Bone Marrow MSCs Are Dynamic, Fate-Restricted Participants in Bone Maintenance and Regeneration

SUMMARY

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) commonly defined by in vitro functions have entered clinical application despite little definition of their function in residence. Here, we report genetic pulse-chase experiments that define osteoblastic cells as short-lived and nonreplicative, requiring replenishment from bone-marrow-derived, Mx1+ stromal cells with “MSC” features. These cells respond to tissue stress and migrate to sites of injury, supplying new osteoblasts during fracture healing. Single cell transplantation yielded progeny that both preserve progenitor function and differentiate into osteoblasts, producing new bone. They are capable of local and systemic translocation and serial transplantation. While these cells meet current definitions of MSCs in vitro, they are osteolineage restricted in vivo in growing and adult animals. Therefore, bone-marrow-derived MSCs may be a heterogeneous population with the Mx1+ population, representing a highly dynamic and stress responsive stem/progenitor cell population of fate-restricted potential that feeds the high cell replacement demands of the adult skeleton.

INTRODUCTION

Complex multicellular organisms depend on mesenchymal cells to provide an architectural superstructure for the body whole and the organs within it. Yet, a detailed understanding of these cells is very limited for most tissues with the exception of the musculoskeletal system. There, it is apparent that subpopulations of mesenchymal cells provide specific functional roles, including osteolineage cell participation in bone maintenance, bone marrow function, and metabolic regulation (Lee et al., 2007; Raaijmakers et al., 2010).

The existence of multipotent bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), or skeletal/mesenchymal stem cells (SSCs/MSCs, hereafter MSCs) was proposed based on the identification of clonogenic populations within the bone marrow that could differentiate into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes ex vivo (Caplan, 1991; Friedenstein et al., 1974) and, in some cases, recapitulate bone and marrow formation upon transplantation of cultured cells (Sacchetti et al., 2007). Similar multipotent MSCs can be isolated from mouse bone marrow (Morikawa et al., 2009) or from multiple tissue types in human (Crisan et al., 2008). These isolated populations have entered clinical testing to either replace cells in damaged tissues or provide paracrine signals to modulate injury or immune responses. However, how such cells perform in vivo and how they contribute to the homeostasis of tissues in situ remains poorly understood, and therefore, in vivo clonal analysis of endogenous MSCs is required.

Cell replacement under homeostatic conditions or after injury is controlled either by symmetric division of existing mature cells (Dor et al., 2004) or by differentiation of stem/progenitor cells (Li and Clevers, 2010). The existence of stem or progenitor cell populations that can generate skeletal tissues in vivo has been documented by transplantation of MCAM/CD146+ subendothelial cells from human bone marrow (Sacchetti et al., 2007) or CD105+Thy1 cells from mouse fetal bone (Chan et al., 2009) and by lineage tracing of nestin+ bone marrow cells (Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010). Yet, which osteolineage cells divide and contribute to skeletal remodeling and repair is unclear. Some studies indicate that bone-surface osteoblasts are postmitotic and replaced by unspecified immature cells (Kalajzic et al., 2008; McCulloch and Heersche, 1988; Owen and MacPherson, 1963), while in development, osteoblasts divide (Dominici et al., 2009; Maes et al., 2010). Further, blood-borne cells contributing to bone repair have been suggested by reports of circulating osteoblasts (Eghbali-Fatourechi et al., 2005; Otsuru et al., 2008). Therefore, the dynamics of osteolineage cells in adult animals is an issue of debate.

Population dynamics is of particular interest given recent findings that osteolineage cells, when perturbed, can result in conditions of disorganization of the hematopoietic system, including myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia (Raaijmakers et al., 2010; Walkley et al., 2007a). These models suggest that genetic alterations in the microenvironment can be an initiating lesion in the multistep pathway to cancer, at least in the bone marrow (Raaijmakers et al., 2010). If osteolineage cells are long-lived and replace themselves, such a model would be less likely. In contrast, a stem/progenitor population replenishing short-lived mature cells could provide the scenario for acquired genetic lesions to affect a larger pool of microenvironmental cells, particularly if such cells were capable of translocation. Here, we define that the latter conditions describe the kinetics and functional properties of osteolineage cells in adult mice using engineered strains that enable marking of specific cells types, including the putative MSC.

RESULTS

Pulse-Chase of Mature Osteoblasts In Vivo

To study the kinetics and fate of functional mature cells, we used a mouse with the mature osteoblast specific gene, osteocalcin (Ocn) (Ducy et al., 1996), driving a Cre recombinase and modified estrogen receptor (ER) fusion gene. These mice were crossed with ROSA26-loxP-stop-loxP-EYFP (herein Rosa-YFP) reporter mice to generate Ocn-Cre-ER+Rosa-YFP+ (herein iOcn) mice (Figure 1A) where Cre recombinase could be activated in a cell-stage- and time-dependent manner, the latter by administration of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). We administered 4-OHT to 6- to 8-week-old mice, resulting in loxP-flanked stop sequence deletion and the constitutive expression of the YFP reporter gene in mature osteoblasts and their progeny. Immunohistochemistry for the reporter detected distinct and quantifiable YFP+ osteoblasts on the endosteal and periosteal surfaces of femurs and calvaria from iOcn reporter mice at 14 days after only two doses of 4-OHT treatment (Figure S1A available online), confirming the efficiency of our system.

Figure 1
Mature osteocalcin+ Osteoblasts Turn Over Rapidly In Vivo without Evidence of Proliferation

Rapid Turnover of Mature Osteoblasts In Vivo

Intravital, two-photon/confocal hybrid microscopy was used to visualize, quantify, and track the position of Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts in live animals (Lo Celso et al., 2009) (Figure 1A). Fourteen days after 4-OHT treatment, we scanned both sides of the sagittal (S.S.) and coronal (C.S.) sutures, which permitted examination of 40%–60% of the calvarial cavities of the mouse (Sipkins et al., 2005) (Figure 1B, left panel). We detected quantifiable YFP+ osteoblasts distinct from bone matrix (blue; by second harmonic generation) and vasculature (red; Q-dot) (Figures 1B [right] and S1B). To trace the same cells over time, we selected a specific region based on invariant suture landmarks and mapped this cavity using four to six consecutive images with Z-stacks (Figure 1B, L1–L4), sequentially imaging individual iOcn mice over a 6-month period. Without 4-OHT treatment, very low or no detectable YFP+ osteoblasts were detected (1.75 ± 1.5 cells in 660 µm2) (Figure 1C, n = 4). We found a peak YFP-labeling of endosteal osteoblasts at 14 days (118 ± 31.4 in 660 µm2, n = 6), followed by a significant decrease to ~50% by 30 days (p < 0.0001), eventually reaching the basal level by 60 days (Figures 1C, 1D, and S1C). 3D reconstruction of the Z-stack images showed that the majority of YFP+ osteoblasts were individually and discontinuously distributed along the endosteal surface without clustering (Figure 1C, bottom). (Note, microvessels vary because the exposure of the skull for imaging leads to wound responses.) Immunohistochemistry of selected bones imaged above at day 14 and day 60 confirmed the results of the in vivo imaging (Figure S1D). In contrast to osteoblasts, small, bone-embedded YFP+ osteocytes peaked in number at 30 days after 4-OHT treatment and then decreased over time, consistent with existing paradigms whereby some mature osteoblasts differentiate into osteocytes (Dallas and Bonewald, 2010) (Figure 1E). Histology of femurs and calvaria also confirmed the decrease in labeled endosteal and periosteal osteoblasts, consistent with intravital microscopy (Figures S1D and S1E).

Despite the continuous decrease in number of Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts, it could be possible that mature osteoblasts proliferate early after tamoxifen induction. Therefore, we performed anti-Ki-67 immunohistochemistry with calvarial bones at day 4 and day 7 after 4-OHT treatment because efficient YFP labeling begins 2–3 days after tamoxifen induction. In all time points examined (day 14, data not shown), there was no observable Ki-67 staining in these cells (n > 200 counted, Figure 1F), demonstrating that existing osteoblasts turn over rapidly and are continuously replaced by another cell population. Independent experiments using BrdU uptake confirmed these results (Figure S1F).

Because mature osteoblasts were reported to proliferate in irradiated bones (Dominici et al., 2009), we next examined whether a distinct type of injury might result in osteoblast proliferation. iOcn mice were crossed with Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-DTR (iDTR, inducible diphtheria toxin receptor) mice. In Ocn-Cre-ER+Rosa-YFP+iDTR+ trigenic mice (hereafter iOcn/iDTR), the administration of 4-OHT can induce both YFP and DTR expression specifically within mature osteoblasts. Injecting low-dose diphtheria toxin (DT) and tracking Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts, we noted ~90% elimination of the labeled cells at 7 days (Figure 1G, right). Control DT-treated iOcn mice without DTR showed no effect on labeled osteoblasts (data not shown). The remaining Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts were evaluated intermittently over a 3 month interval and no increase or clustering of Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts was noted (Figure 1G), further demonstrating that mature osteoblasts do not proliferate.

Osterix+ Osteolineage Cells Are a Transient Source of Osteoblasts in Adult Mice

Osterix (Osx) is known to be expressed earlier than osteocalcin in the osteoblast lineage (Rodda and McMahon, 2006). A recent report showed that osterix-expressing preosteoblasts are the origin of trabecular osteoblasts and osteocytes in developing bones (Maes et al., 2010). A similar relationship between cells was observed in fracture healing (Maes et al., 2010). This population is also thought to be important in regulating hematopoiesis (Raaijmakers et al., 2010; Walkley et al., 2007a). We therefore examined the expansion and durability of YFP+ cells using a mouse where the Osx promoter drives a Cre-ER fusion gene, crossed with Rosa-YFP reporter mice to generate Osx-Cre-ER+Rosa-YFP+ (herein iOsx) mice (Figures 2A and S2A). To test whether preosteoblasts contribute to the long-term maintenance of mature osteoblasts under homeostasis, we conducted genetic pulse-chase experiments using iOsx reporter mice. Fourteen days after 4-OHT treatment, intravital microscopy analysis and anti-GFP/YFP immunohistochemistry revealed that, unlike Ocn/YFP+ mature osteoblasts, most Osx/YFP+ preosteoblasts were detected in the outer margin and the osteogenic front of sutures or bone marrow. Only a small portion of cells (<20%) were located on the endosteal surface of marrow cavities (Figures 2A and S2B). Therefore, we selected a specific region covering the first frontal bone cavity and the S.S., located in the left side of the S.S. and C.S. intersection, and counted the number of Osx/YFP+ preosteoblasts and their progeny. Tracing of labeled preosteoblasts by sequential imaging revealed that the average number of Osx/YFP+ cells increased temporarily at 30 days after induction, but later decreased, and returned to the basal level at ~90 days (Figures 2B and 2C). We confirmed this with anti-GFP/YFP immunohistochemistry on femoral bone, and their differentiation, with anti-Ocn immunohistochemistry (Figures S2C and S2D). Consistent with a previous study (Maes et al., 2010), we observed that distinct Osx/YFP+ cells on the periosteal surface near the suture were Ki-67+ (Figure 2D). However, the percentage of Ki-67+ cells within Osx-labeled cells from adult bones was much lower (~1%; 2–3 cells/200 counted, n = 3) than that from developing bones (22% ± 3%) (Maes et al., 2010) and, like the Ocn-labeled cells, there was no durable labeling of Osx-labeled preosteoblasts. This result suggests that the osterix-expressing population does not represent a self-renewing pool of progenitors.

Figure 2
Osterix+ Preosteoblasts Turn Over Rapidly In Vivo without Evidence of Proliferation

To confirm that the labeled mature osteoblasts were continuously replaced by new osteoblasts, iOcn mice imaged at day 60 after the first 4-OHT treatment were followed for 2 additional months and a second sequence of 4-OHT was administered. At 14 days after the second 4-OHT pulse, imaging the same sites revealed an increase in the number of Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts (Figure 2E). This increase was approximately equivalent to the number observed at 14 days after the first 4-OHT treatment, and the numbers again decreased with similar kinetics (data not shown).

Taken together, these data demonstrate that existing osteoblasts and preosteoblasts turn over rapidly and are continuously replaced by new osteoblasts. If the new osteoblasts were derived from division of the existing osteoblasts, genetically labeled 2–3 three months earlier, we would have anticipated that the portion of labeled cells would remain relatively constant over this period. Because labeling of osteoblasts instead required a second activation of Cre recombinase, the new cells were likely derived from a different cell source that had not previously expressed the osteoblast markers Ocn and Osx.

Long-Term Maintenance of Osteogenic Cells Is Provided by Progenitors

The myxovirus resistance-1 (Mx1) promoter has been shown to be activated in bone marrow stromal cells of undefined identity (Walkley et al., 2007b). In an attempt to define a marker for more immature osteolineage cells, we assessed Mx1-Cre mice crossed with Rosa-YFP reporter mice (hereafter Mx1/YFP). Twenty days after pIpC administration (25 mg/kg every other day for 10 days) to activate Mx1, we observed YFP labeling in 70% ± 8% of endosteal bone cells (Figures 3A [top] and and3C).3C). Additional immunohistochemistry with anti-Ocn, anti-osteopontin (expressed by mature osteoblasts; data not shown), and anti-Osx antibodies confirmed that the Mx1/YFP+ cells on the endosteal surface of bones were osteogenic cells (Figure 3A, top middle and right). Because Mx1-inducible cells include hematopoietic-derived osteoclasts (Walkley et al., 2007b), it is possible that some of YFP+ bone cells were osteoclasts. To exclude this possibility and improve specific cell quantification, we developed trigenic Mx1-Cre+Rosa-Tomato+Ocn-GFP+ mice (Mx1/Tomato/Ocn-GFP) by crossing Mx1-Cre mice with Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdTomato reporter and Ocn-GFP mice, allowing the distinction between Mx1-induced osteoblasts (red and green) and Mx1 noninducible osteoblasts (green). Flow cytometric analysis showed that 88% of Ocn+ osteoblasts were red and green at 30 days postinduction (Figure 3B), confirming that Mx1 labels the majority of endosteal bone cells. Next, to examine the durable labeling of Mx1 and to eliminate Mx1-inducible hematopoietic cells, we transplanted wild-type marrow cells (WT-BMT) into lethally irradiated Mx1/YFP mice and, 8 weeks later, induced Mx1 activity by pIpC treatment. Over 6–10 months after labeling (four to five cycles of osteoblast turnover), about 80% of Ocn+ osteoblasts on the endosteal surface in femurs and calvaria remained YFP+ (Figures 3A [bottom], [bottom],3C,3C, and S3B), indicating that the labeling of osteoblasts by Mx1 is durable. We observed similar results in nonirradiated, non-WT-BMT animals (Figure S3A). We confirmed low basal activity of Mx1-Cre and the specificity of these data by anti-GFP/YFP and ant-Ocn immunohistochemistry with femurs from the indicated control mice (Figures 3C [−pIpC] and S3C). The level of Mx1-induced hematopoietic cells was less than 1% (6 months) or undetectable (10 months) in the mice (data not shown), arguing against a contribution of Mx1-induced osteoclasts to the endosteal cell population. Comparing osteoblast labeling with that of the hematopoietic compartment revealed that the percentage of marked osteolineage cells was similar to the labeling of LT-HSCs (Kiel et al., 2005) (>95%, Figures S3C and S3D), but much higher than that of mature hematopoietic cells (~40%–60%, Figures S3E and S3F), further suggesting that Mx1-Cre can efficiently label osteogenic stem/progenitors.

Figure 3
Mx1-Induced Cells Have MSC Characteristics and Maintain Long-Term Repopulation of Osteoblasts In Vivo

Previously, it has been suggested that mesenchymal/osteogenic progenitors are located in midsuture and are critical for calvarial bone growth, whereas more differentiated osteogenic cells are in the osteogenic fronts of parietal bones (Lana-Elola et al., 2007). Consistent with this, most of the midsuture mesenchymal cells from all sutures examined in Mx1/YFP mice were homogeneously and durably labeled by the Mx1 promoter, whereas GFP+ cells labeled by activity of the Col2.3 (an osteoblastic promoter induced by Osx) and Ocn promoters were detected only in the osteogenic fronts of the parietal bones (Figure S3G). In addition, flow cytometric analysis of CD45CD105+ osteogenic progenitor fraction (Chan et al., 2009) showed constant labeling at 40 days after induction (Figure S3C), indicating that the induction of Mx1 labels endogenous osteogenic stem/progenitors that can maintain the majority (>80%) of mature osteoblasts over time in the adult mouse.

Mx1-Induced Progenitors Are Clonogenic and Have Multilineage Differentiation Potential In Vitro

Others have demonstrated that mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells are enriched in the Sca1+CD90+ or Sca1+CD140a+ bone marrow fractions (Chan et al., 2009; Morikawa et al., 2009). We found that 93% of clonogenic stromal cells were present in the nonhematopoietic (CD45Ter119CD31) CD105+CD140a+ bone cells (5.4% ± 2.9%, Figure 3D). Further immunophenotypic analysis revealed that this fraction was similar to the recently defined Sca1+CD140a+ MSCs, with uniformly high expression of Sca-1, CD29, CD44, and CD133 and lower expression of CD90, CD49d, and CD71 (Morikawa et al., 2009) (Figure S3H). To test whether Mx1-Cre marks this fraction, analysis of Mx1/YFP mice revealed that 44% ± 9% of the CD105+CD140a+ fraction was YFP+ and the fraction marked with YFP was enriched for ~80% of the clonogenic cells. The clonogenic frequency of this fraction is ~1 in 20, which is 50-fold higher than that of CD45Ter119 cells (~1/1,000) and ~50,000 fold higher than that of unfractionated bone marrow stromal cells (~1/1 × 106 cells) (Figure 3E). Those colonies that emerged from the YFP fraction were morphologically distinct, resembling what others have described as endothelial cells (Morikawa et al., 2009). Using a single pulse of pIpC and in vivo imaging, we defined that Mx1 labels a majority of osteogenic progenitors and a fraction of Ocn+ mature osteoblasts (Figure S4A), but not osteocytes (data not shown). However, GFP+ cells from iOcn, iOsx, or Col2.3-GFP mice comprised <3% of the CD105+CD140a+ fraction and did not form colonies (Figures S4B and S4C). Therefore, Mx1 induction labels an immature, clonogenic subset of the CD105- and CD140a-expressing putative MSCs, and by comparison with the results of labeling more mature populations, it can be used to discern MSC function in vivo.

When Mx1-induced progenitors (YFP+CD105+CD140a+ CD45Ter119CD31) were single-cell sorted and cultured, single Mx1-induced progenitors formed colonies that were YFP+ (Figure S4D). Cells from a single, dispersed and split Mx1/YFP+ colony were cultured under differentiation conditions and demonstrated the ability to become osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes at a single-cell level in vitro (Figure 3F). These analyses indicate that Mx1-labeled colony-forming cells are consistent with what others have called MSCs at a single-cell level by in vitro analysis.

One limitation of our single reporter system is that the possible existence of Mx1 MSCs or the increase of their descendents would not be visualized. To overcome this limitation, we crossed Mx1-Cre mice with Rosa26-loxP-mTomato-loxP-mEGFP (mTmG) dual reporter mice (hereafter Mx1/mTmG). In this model, the mTomato cassette is deleted in the Mx1-Cre inducible cells, allowing the expression of the GFP, while Mx1 noninducible cells and their progeny express mTomato and remain red. After wild-type marrow transplantation followed by pIpC treatment and an additional 90 days of incubation, anti-Ocn immunohistochemical analysis of femurs showed that the vast majority (>90%) of osteoblasts on the endosteal surface and of suture mesenchymal cells maintained GFP labeling homogenously (Figures 3G [top] and S3G [right]). The persistence of Mx1/GFP labeling and absence of dilution by unlabeled cells suggests that Mx1 efficiently labels osteolineage cells and that more immature Mx1 (red) progenitors did not contribute significantly to osteoblastic homeostasis. A known marker of a rare quiescent MSC population capable of multilineage cell production is the cytoskeletal component nestin (Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010). We found that most (~59%), but not all, nestin+ cells in the bone marrow were also Mx1/GFP labeled (Figure 3G, bottom). Using a nestin-GFP mouse, we confirmed that nestin+ cells are highly enriched in the CD105+140a+ fraction (43%) and that nestin is also highly expressed in suture mesenchymal cells (Figures S4E and S4F), similar with Mx1/YFP mouse. Therefore, Mx1/GFP+ cells overlap with at least a subpopulation of the nestin+ MSCs in the bone marrow.

Limited Lineage Potential of Mx1-Induced MSCs In Vivo

Because Mx1-induced progenitors met the ex vivo criteria for MSCs, we used these cells to test the potential for such cells to exert their putative multipotency in vivo. The staining of chondrocytes in femurs from Mx1/YFP mice (+pIpC at 6–8 weeks age) by anti-aggrecan antibody revealed no YFP signal in chondrocytes in either articular cartilage or the growth plate (data not shown) at 40 days, 6 months, (Figure 4A), or up to 10 months (Figure S3B, middle) after pIpC induction. Even when Mx1 activity was induced when bone and cartilage development was active (P7), no YFP signal was apparent in chondrocytes (Figure 4A, +pIpC at P7), indicating an absence of in vivo chondrogenic potential.

Figure 4
Mx1-Induced Cells Are Osteogenic Stem/Progenitors and Do Not Contribute to the Maintenance of Other Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Cells In Vivo

To assess adipocyte potential of Mx1-induced progenitors, we examined bone marrow and periosteal adipocytes at varying ages. Despite a more than 10-fold increase of bone marrow adipocytes as measured by anti-perilipin antibody staining in old Mx1-induced mice (12 months old with 6 months after pIpC following 2 months after BMT) as compared with young Mx1-induced mice (4 months old with 40 days after pIpC), neither population of mice had >5% of adipocytes marked by Mx1-Cre (Figures 4B, S5A, and S5B). These data suggest that adipogenic differentiation of Mx1-induced progenitors in adult mice is rare despite the generation of new adipocytes in the bone marrow and the adipogenic capacity of the cells ex vivo.

To further confirm these data, we employed Mx1/mTmG dual reporter mice, which are described in Figure 3G. Consistent with the Mx1/YFP model, in vivo imaging of calvaria showed that the vast majority of osteoblasts on the endosteal surface and of suture mesenchymal cells maintained mGFP labeling homogenously (Figure 4D, left). Interestingly, many perivascular cells close to the endosteal surface were labeled with GFP, a site reported by others to be the location of MSCs (Figures 4C and S5C) (Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010). In addition, immunohistochemical analysis of femurs showed that all chondrocytes, skeletal muscle cells, fibroblasts, and blood vessels remained red, supporting the idea that they are functional, but Mx1 noninducible (Figures 4D, S5D, and S5E). Therefore, Mx1 induction labels MSC-like cells in vivo that are only fated to the osteolineage, and not these other cell types, under physiological conditions in the adult mouse skeleton.

Mx1-Induced Osteogenic Stem/Progenitors Are the Source of New Osteoblasts for Fracture Repair In Vivo

Fracture healing is associated with an increase in local osteoblasts (Leucht et al., 2007). However, the origin of new osteoblasts in fracture sites has not been clearly demonstrated (Schindeler et al., 2008). Therefore, to define the source of the osteoblasts located at injury sites, we generated microfractures of the calvarium using needle wounding at osteostage-specific pulse-labeled animals. When Ocn/YFP+ mature osteoblasts (iOcn mice) and Osx/YFP+ preosteoblasts (iOsx mice) were tracked for 7 days after injury, they increased in number at the injury site, but only small numbers were detected by sequential in vivo imaging (Figures 5A [top] and and5B).5B). In contrast, Mx1-induced osteogenic cells in Mx1/mTmG mice newly appeared in the site of the fracture at 2 days and dramatically increased at 7 days after injury (Figures 5A [bottom] and S6A). Most of the osteogenic cells at the fracture site were GFP+ and the number of Mx1-induced cells at the injury site increased by more than 100- fold (Figure 5B, square). By anti-Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, no anti-Ki-67 staining in iOcn mice and rare staining (<3%) in iOsx mice was evident (Figure S6B). However, >10% of Mx1-induced osteogenic cells were Ki-67+ in Mx1/mTmG mice (Figure 5C, top). This fraction was much higher than that in uninjured bones (<1%; data not shown) and new clusters of Mx1/GFP+ osteogenic cells observed at the fracture site stained positively for Ocn (Figure 5C, bottom), indicating the responsiveness of this population to physiologic challenge. Of note, these cells did not stain with anti-CD45 and were therefore not inflammatory cells that had consumed the GFP dye (Figure S6C). To further distinguish and enumerate stem/progenitor cells and mature osteoblasts during fracture healing, we used trigenic Mx1/Tomato/Ocn-GFP dual reporter mice. In this model, Mx1- induced stem/progenitors express Tomato and their osteoblastic progeny express Tomato and GFP, while mature osteoblasts from Mx1-noninducible progenitors express GFP alone. When mature osteoblasts and their progenitors were tracked for 21 days after injury, Mx1-induced stem/progenitors (Tomato+) newly appeared in the site of the fracture at 2–5 days and dramatically increased in number at 12 days. Subsequently, Mx1-labeled stem/progenitors near the fracture surface differentiated into GFP+ osteoblasts (Figure 5D, day 12, yellow). More importantly, most osteoblasts associated with new bone (analyzed by second harmonic generation; blue) at the fracture site were Tomato and GFP double positive, and there were no observable GFP single positive osteoblasts. These results demonstrate that the migration and proliferation of osteogenic progenitor cells labeled by Mx1 supply the majority of osteoblastic cells participating in fracture healing (Figure 5D, day 21). Consistently, when microfractures were generated at distal metaphysis and articular cartilage of femoral bones, the number of Mx1-labeled periosteal (inner cambial) and endosteal osteoblasts at the fracture site markedly increased compared to that in uninjured bones at 21 days after injury (Figure 5E). In addition, newly generated chondrocytes during the fracture healing remained Mx1 (Figure 5E, right, white arrows), further supporting the idea that the Mx1-labeled osteogenic stem/progenitors (OSPCs) are distinct from chondrogenic progenitors.

Figure 5
Migration and Proliferation of Mx1-Induced OSPCs, but Not Differentiated Osteoblasts, Supply the Majority of Osteoblasts in Fracture Healing

To test the migration of osteoblasts toward injury in vivo, continuous Z-stack imaging of individual cells with intravital microscopy was conducted over 7 hr at 24 hr after injury (Figure S6D). In addition, we sequentially scanned the detailed structures of bone matrix, osteoblasts, and vessels near the injury sites immediately (0 hr), 24 hr, and 48 hr after injury (Figure 5F). We noted that multiple Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts appeared to move toward the injury site. We confirmed these results by Z-stack imaging (Figure S6E). Interestingly, the endosteal Ocn/YFP+ osteoblasts of the uninjured controls were also observed to shift position in a manner not explained by the subject’s breathing or pulse (data not shown).

Transplantation Capability of OSPCs

We next tested whether osteogenic stem/progenitors isolated from Mx1/YFP mice were capable of translocating by a blood-borne route. Mx1-induced OSPCs (isolated as in Figure 3E, red box) from these mice transplanted with wild-type marrow were isolated by flow cytometry and injected intravenously into nonirradiated (Figures 6A [left] and S7A) or sublethally irradiated (Figures 6A [right] and S7B) wild-type recipients. The Mx1/YFP+ OSPCs homed to the abluminal surface of sinusoidal vessels in the bone marrow at day 7, increased in number, and stably incorporated as bone units on endosteal surfaces for at least 4 months with over 70% (5/7) engraftment efficiency. They further differentiated into Ocn+ mature osteoblasts at multiple sites in femurs (Figure 6B). In contrast, transplantation of control YFP+CD105+CD140a cells (isolated as in Figure 3D, box A) from Mx1-induced mice (data not shown) or GFP+ cells (mature osteoblasts) from Col 2.3kb-GFP mice did not reveal YFP+ or GFP+ cells on the endosteal surface (Figure 6A, top). We compared the homing of OSPCs with that of HSPCs (LKSCD48CD150+) (Kiel et al., 2005) by in vivo imaging of calvarial bone marrow cavities (Lo Celso et al., 2009) and found that OSPCs homed to bone marrow with an efficiency of ~15%–20% that of HSCs (Figure 6C). Therefore, Mx1-induced OSPCs can translocate by vascular spread and engraft at distal sites.

Figure 6
Mx1-Induced OSPCs Are Transplantable by Intravenous Infusion

Functional Capacity of Transplanted Mx1-Induced OSPCs

Although we observed long-term engraftment and osteoblast differentiation of transplanted Mx1-induced OSPCs, their functional contribution to recipient bones was not clear. Therefore, we assessed the in vivo contribution of transplanted OSPCs in the repair of fractured bone in aged female animals as an assessment of potential in a model resembling a clinical need. Using the same number of freshly isolated mature osteoblasts (Col2.3kb-GFP-labeled) or OSPCs (Mx1-labeled) in matrigel, we transplanted cells at the site of mechanical injury and examined bone repair. We observed engraftment of OSPCs in substantially increased numbers at the fracture sites (Figure 7A). These cells differentiated into functional osteoblasts (Ob) and osteocalcin-expressing osteocytes (Ocy) (Figure 7B, right) producing a bone bridge and ectopic mineralized bones (Figures 7A [arrows] and and7B7B [black squares]) in marked contrast to transplanted mature osteoblasts (Figure 7A, top). We confirmed these results by anti-type-I collagen immunohistochemistry (data not shown). Next, to further test their progenitor function, we assessed the clonal dynamics of Mx1-labeled OSPCs. When single Mx1-labeled OSPCs were isolated, transplanted, and tracked in vivo, they rapidly generated new progenitors at the site of injury (Figure 7C, day 7). Later, these cells acquired features of differentiated osteoblasts (red and green) and produced mineralized bone (blue) (Figure 7C, day 21), while some of them remained as progenitors (red). These data indicate that Mx1-induced OSPCs can be transplanted and functionally contribute to the recovery of injured bones. When transplanted at a limiting dilution level, OSPCs rapidly generated new cells with ~1 in 40 engraftment efficiency in vivo at the site of injury (Figure 7D). When Mx1-labeled cells were reisolated at 4 weeks after transplantation, 33% ± 5% preserved progenitor characteristics and successfully repopulated with secondary transplantation (Figure 7E). These data indicate that Mx1-induced OSPCs can be transplanted, and that they functionally contribute to the recovery of injured bones. Further, the stem/progenitor cells are capable of secondary transplantation, indicating that they can either self-renew or at least be maintained at the injury site.

Figure 7
Mx1-Induced OSPCs Contribute to Fracture Healing

DISCUSSION

The studies presented here clarify the source and lifespan of osteoblasts in the adult mouse, building on historic work using morphologic definitions of cells and 3H-thymidine incorporation in a mixed cell population (Jilka et al., 1998; McCulloch and Heersche, 1988; Owen and MacPherson, 1963). The use of genetic tools now permits a more precise definition of the short lifespan (~60 days) and postmitotic state of mature osteoblasts, the duration and modest proliferation of preosteoblasts, and the self-preserving nature and rapid cell cycling of the osteogenic stem/progenitor cells that maintain life-long osteolineage cells.

The identity and in vivo multipotency of putative MSCs from various different tissues has been a source of controversy (Caplan and Correa, 2011). The MSC as most commonly defined is a cell with CFU-F and multilineage differentiation potential in vitro. Our data indicate that Mx1-induced cells satisfy the characteristics of what has been termed an MSC by immunophenotype, clonogenic capacity, single cell-derived multilineage differentiation capability ex vivo, and in vivo osteogenic differentiation and new bone formation after transplantation. These bone marrow cells appear to be a subset of the generally quiescent nestin+ cells that contribute to the HSC niche (Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010) and may not reflect all of the different cell populations that have been termed “MSCs” and studied by others. The Mx1-induced cells are predominantly osteolineage restricted with only a minimal amount of adipocytic cell marking with lineage tracing and are more consistent with a skeletal stem cell as proposed by Bianco et al. than a broadly defined MSC (Bianco et al., 2008). Whether the adipocytes derived in vivo from bipotential Mx1-induced cells or a distinct subset within the Mx1-induced pool cannot be determined. However, our data clearly demonstrate that Mx1-induced cells do not label chondrocytes both under homeostatic and after fracture injury in vivo, a population that has been shown to be a descendent of nestin-labeled cells (Méndez-Ferrer et al., 2010). These data imply that Mx1-induced OSPCs do represent a distinct and not entirely overlapping subset of nestin+ cells, suggesting the possible heterogeneity of nestin+ cells in bone marrow with distinct lineage capability.

The bone healing mechanism and the source of new osteoblasts in fracture sites have been long controversial (Schindeler et al., 2008). Mx1-induced OSPCs are responsive to stress conditions and fracture in contrast to Osx-labeled or Ocn-labeled osteoblasts. By the sequential imaging of fracture sites in Mx1 and Ocn dual reporter mice, osteogenic progenitors were shown to appear at the site of injury as early as 2 days after injury and proliferate, with the cells close to the fracture differentiating into functional osteoblasts. In addition, the absence of distinct osteoblasts that failed to label with Mx1 within the injury indicates that Mx1-labeled OSPCs are the source of new osteoblasts during fracture healing (Figure 5D). Although we did not test whether OSPCs circulate under physiologic conditions, as reported by others (Otsuru et al., 2008), we observed that they are capable of translocating locally and via the vasculature by transplantation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the contribution of this subset of putatively multipotent BMSCs to bone regeneration and repair is very lineage limited in adult animals in vivo and that Mx1 labels an osteolineage stem/progenitor population.

The ability of proliferating, durable stem/progenitor cells to replace short-lived mature cells and to translocate to local and distant sites poses an interesting possibility for their involvement in disease. The prior studies indicate that altered marrow micro-environmental cells can induce hematopoietic disease (Raaijmakers et al., 2010; Walkley et al., 2007a), giving them a greater potential as a disease mechanism based on the findings here. Inherited genetic syndromes (such as Schwachmann-Diamond Syndrome) are plausibly associated with a broad-based defect in hematopoietic support on the basis of skeletal defects as suggested by prior studies deleting the disease-associated gene (Sbds) selectively in preosteoblasts (Raaijmakers et al., 2010). Contributions to acquired disease would be in question if mature cells turned over rarely and were replaced by mature cell division. If mature cells turn over rapidly and are replaced by an amplifying pool of stem/progenitors, the likelihood that acquired genetic lesions in that primitive pool could persist, accumulate, and yield large numbers of mature cells increases. The genetic pulse-chase studies of endogenous osteolineage stem/progenitors presented here provide data that such a population exists in vivo, is replicative, and is responsible for dynamically replacing the short-lived osteolineage in homeostasis or after injury. Further, these cells can translocate, indicating their potential to have a more systemic effect than would be expected from a highly locally constrained pool. Together, our studies indicate that mesenchymal cells in bone and bone marrow have a hierarchical organization of long-term repopulating progenitors serving to replace short-lived, postmitotic, mature cells, similar to tissues such as the blood, skin, and intestine.

To be clear, we point out that the cells we have studied here are a subset of mesenchymal cells in the bone marrow. They may not reflect the behavior of putative MSCs from other tissues or other bone marrow subsets of mesenchymal cells. There may indeed by true multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (such as some of the nestin-expressing cells). However, our data indicate that multipotentcy ex vivo should be regarded with caution, as it is not a reliable guide as to how the cells will function in vivo. The Mx1+ subset of BMSCs is, in vivo, an osteolineage-restricted stem/progenitor cell subset.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Mice

Six- to eight-week-old C57BL/6 mice, Mx1-Cre (B6.Cg-Tg(Mx1-cre)1Cgn/J), Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-EYFP (Rosa-YFP, B6.129X1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/J), Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-tdTomato (Rosa-Tomato, B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J), Rosa26-loxP-stop-loxP-DTR (iDTR) (Buch et al., 2005), and Rosa26-loxP-mTomato-loxP-mEGFP (mTmG, B6.129(Cg)-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato–EGFP)Luo/J) were purchased from Jackson laboratory. Col2.3-GFP, Ocn-GFP, Osx-Cre-ER (Maes et al., 2010) and Ocn-Cre-ER (C57BL/6 background) mice were provided by author H.M.K. The induction of iDTR and Mx1 is described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. All mice were maintained in pathogen-free conditions, and all procedures were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

In Vivo Imaging

To image YFP+ osteoblasts and osteogenic progenitors in vivo, indicated mice were anesthetized and prepared for a custom-built two-photon and confocal hybrid microscope specifically designed for live animal imaging as described previously (Sipkins et al., 2005) (Lo Celso et al., 2009). Briefly, to trace the change in osteoblast number over time, the injured site or the first frontal bone cavity located in the upper left side of the S.S. and C.S. intersection was mapped by four to six consecutive images (660 µm2/image), which covered most of the endosteal osteoblasts (YFP), the vessel network (Q-dots), and the bone structures (second harmonic generation by multiphoton laser) in the cavity. Each image was recorded by Z-stacks with 50–100 µm depth from bone surface and 2 µm interval. Details in intravital microscopy are described in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. 3D images were reconstructed using Nikon NIS-Elements software, and osteoblast numbers were counted. A two-tailed type 2 t test was applied to all data. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Creation of Microfractures and Live Animal Imaging after Injury

For live imaging of osteoblasts near injury, a small incision was introduced on the scalp of indicated mice, and two separate microfractures were generated by a 25G or a 27G needle drilling on the surface of calvaria near the intersection of the S.S. and C.S. Ocn/YFP+, Osx/YFP+, Mx1/YFP+, or Mx1/Tomato cells near the injury were tracked by sequential in vivo imaging at the indicated time points. Separately, a small incision was introduced on the right knee and two separate microfractures were generated by needle drilling (20G) at distal metaphysis and articular cartilage of femurs of wild-type marrow-transplanted and pIpC-treated Mx1 reporter mice. Three weeks after injury, injured and uninjured (control) femurs were analyzed by immunofluorescence staining using the indicated antibodies and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.

In Vivo Imaging of Transplantated Osteogenic Stem/Progenitors

Mx1/YFP+ OSPCs (CD45Ter119CD31CD105+CD140a+YFP+) from lethally irradiated Mx1/YFP mice or GFP+ cells from Col2.3-GFP mice were FACS sorted. The sorted cells (5,000 cells/mouse) in 200 µl of PBS were transplanted intravenously into wild-type mice, or the indicated number of sorted cells mixed with 20 µl of matrigel (BD Biosciences) were transplanted upon calvarial injury of normal (for limiting dilution assay) or ~1-year-old wild-type female mice (for ectopic bone formation). To measure in vivo homing ability of osteogenic stem/progenitors, 1,000 sorted Mx1+ OSPCs and 1,000 sorted HSCs (DiD-stained) were mixed and transplanted into irradiated mice. The implantation of donor cells at the sites of injury was analyzed by in vivo imaging and immunofluorescence staining.

Isolation and Flow Cytometry Analysis of Osteoprogenitor Cells

Isolation of osteoprogenitors from compact bones was done by following mouse mesenchymal progenitor isolation protocols from STEMCELL technologies. Details are described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

CFU-F, Ex Vivo Multilineage Differentiation, and Immunofluorescence

Details are described in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

Supplementary Material

SupplementCSC

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank C. Lo Celso, S. Mukherjee, J. Schoonmaker, S. Guo, R. Schlanger, and M. Kim for advice and technical assistance; N. Jeanson, A. Catic, J. Dietrich, and D. Sykes for reading the manuscript; the HSCI/MGH CRM Flow Core (L. Prickett, K. Folz-Donahue, and D. Dombkowski); and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (Fellowship Award to D.P.) and the National Institutes of Health (grants to T.L.C., C.P.L., H.M.K., and D.T.S.).

Footnotes

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Supplemental Information for this article includes seven figures and Supplemental Experimental Procedures and can be found with this article online at doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.003.

REFERENCES

  • Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:313–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Buch T, Heppner FL, Tertilt C, Heinen TJ, Kremer M, Wunderlich FT, Jung S, Waisman A. A Cre-inducible diphtheria toxin receptor mediates cell lineage ablation after toxin administration. Nat. Methods. 2005;2:419–426. [PubMed]
  • Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res. 1991;9:641–650. [PubMed]
  • Caplan AI, Correa D. The MSC: An Injury Drugstore. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:11–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chan CK, Chen CC, Luppen CA, Kim JB, DeBoer AT, Wei K, Helms JA, Kuo CJ, Kraft DL, Weissman IL. Endochondral ossification is required for haematopoietic stem-cell niche formation. Nature. 2009;457:490–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, Chen CW, Corselli M, Park TS, Andriolo G, Sun B, Zheng B, Zhang L, et al. A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:301–313. [PubMed]
  • Dallas SL, Bonewald LF. Dynamics of the transition from osteoblast to osteocyte. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2010;1192:437–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dominici M, Rasini V, Bussolari R, Chen X, Hofmann TJ, Spano C, Bernabei D, Veronesi E, Bertoni F, Paolucci P, et al. Restoration and reversible expansion of the osteoblastic hematopoietic stem cell niche after marrow radioablation. Blood. 2009;114:2333–2343. [PubMed]
  • Dor Y, Brown J, Martinez OI, Melton DA. Adult pancreatic beta-cells are formed by self-duplication rather than stem-cell differentiation. Nature. 2004;429:41–46. [PubMed]
  • Ducy P, Desbois C, Boyce B, Pinero G, Story B, Dunstan C, Smith E, Bonadio J, Goldstein S, Gundberg C, et al. Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice. Nature. 1996;382:448–452. [PubMed]
  • Eghbali-Fatourechi GZ, Lamsam J, Fraser D, Nagel D, Riggs BL, Khosla S. Circulating osteoblast-lineage cells in humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:1959–1966. [PubMed]
  • Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhyan RK, Latsinik NV, Panasyuk AF, Keiliss-Borok IV. Stromal cells responsible for transferring the microenvironment of the hemopoietic tissues. Cloning in vitro and retransplantation in vivo. Transplantation. 1974;17:331–340. [PubMed]
  • Jilka RL, Weinstein RS, Bellido T, Parfitt AM, Manolagas SC. Osteoblast programmed cell death (apoptosis): modulation by growth factors and cytokines. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998;13:793–802. [PubMed]
  • Kalajzic Z, Li H, Wang LP, Jiang X, Lamothe K, Adams DJ, Aguila HL, Rowe DW, Kalajzic I. Use of an alpha-smooth muscle actin GFP reporter to identify an osteoprogenitor population. Bone. 2008;43:501–510. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Yilmaz OH, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 2005;121:1109–1121. [PubMed]
  • Lana-Elola E, Rice R, Grigoriadis AE, Rice DP. Cell fate specification during calvarial bone and suture development. Dev. Biol. 2007;311:335–346. [PubMed]
  • Lee NK, Sowa H, Hinoi E, Ferron M, Ahn JD, Confavreux C, Dacquin R, Mee PJ, McKee MD, Jung DY, et al. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell. 2007;130:456–469. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Leucht P, Kim JB, Wazen R, Currey JA, Nanci A, Brunski JB, Helms JA. Effect of mechanical stimuli on skeletal regeneration around implants. Bone. 2007;40:919–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li L, Clevers H. Coexistence of quiescent and active adult stem cells in mammals. Science. 2010;327:542–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lo Celso C, Fleming HE, Wu JW, Zhao CX, Miake-Lye S, Fujisaki J, CÔté D, Rowe DW, Lin CP, Scadden DT. Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche. Nature. 2009;457:92–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Maes C, Kobayashi T, Selig MK, Torrekens S, Roth SI, Mackem S, Carmeliet G, Kronenberg HM. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev. Cell. 2010;19:329–344. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McCulloch CA, Heersche JN. Lifetime of the osteoblast in mouse periodontium. Anat. Rec. 1988;222:128–135. [PubMed]
  • Méndez-Ferrer S, Michurina TV, Ferraro F, Mazloom AR, Macarthur BD, Lira SA, Scadden DT, Ma’ayan A, Enikolopov GN, Frenette PS. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466:829–834. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morikawa S, Mabuchi Y, Kubota Y, Nagai Y, Niibe K, Hiratsu E, Suzuki S, Miyauchi-Hara C, Nagoshi N, Sunabori T, et al. Prospective identification, isolation, and systemic transplantation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells in murine bone marrow. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:2483–2496. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Otsuru S, Tamai K, Yamazaki T, Yoshikawa H, Kaneda Y. Circulating bone marrow-derived osteoblast progenitor cells are recruited to the bone-forming site by the CXCR4/stromal cell-derived factor-1 pathway. Stem Cells. 2008;26:223–234. [PubMed]
  • Owen M, MacPherson S. Cell Population Kinetics of an Osteogenic Tissue. Ii. J. Cell Biol. 1963;19:33–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Raaijmakers MH, Mukherjee S, Guo S, Zhang S, Kobayashi T, Schoonmaker JA, Ebert BL, Al-Shahrour F, Hasserjian RP, Scadden EO, et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature. 2010;464:852–857. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rodda SJ, McMahon AP. Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development. 2006;133:3231–3244. [PubMed]
  • Sacchetti B, Funari A, Michienzi S, Di Cesare S, Piersanti S, Saggio I, Tagliafico E, Ferrari S, Robey PG, Riminucci M, Bianco P. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell. 2007;131:324–336. [PubMed]
  • Schindeler A, McDonald MM, Bokko P, Little DG. Bone remodeling during fracture repair: The cellular picture. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008;19:459–466. [PubMed]
  • Sipkins DA, Wei X, Wu JW, Runnels JM, CÔté D, Means TK, Luster AD, Scadden DT, Lin CP. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature. 2005;435:969–973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Walkley CR, Olsen GH, Dworkin S, Fabb SA, Swann J, McArthur GA, Westmoreland SV, Chambon P, Scadden DT, Purton LE. A microenvironment-induced myeloproliferative syndrome caused by retinoic acid receptor gamma deficiency. Cell. 2007a;129:1097–1110. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Walkley CR, Shea JM, Sims NA, Purton LE, Orkin SH. Rb regulates interactions between hematopoietic stem cells and their bone marrow microenvironment. Cell. 2007b;129:1081–1095. [PMC free article] [PubMed]