PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of advannutSearch Advances in NutritionManuscript SubmissionSubscribe to Advances in NutritionView all articlesRead published version of paper
 
Adv Nutr. 2012 May; 3(3): 351–352.
Published online 2012 May 4. doi:  10.3945/an.111.001123
PMCID: PMC3649469

Impact of Maternal Nutritional Status on Human Milk Quality and Infant Outcomes: An Update on Key Nutrients1,2

The profound importance of human milk in optimizing neonatal health and improving child survival is becoming increasingly more apparent, both domestically (15) and internationally (6). Human milk is recommended as the sole source of nutrition for the first 6 mo of life (710) and is an important food source for the first 1 (7) to 2 y (11). Therefore, promoting and protecting human milk nutrient quality are of great public health concern. Until recently, it was widely believed that nutritional deficiencies in breast-fed infants were relatively rare. Routine supplementation of breast-fed infants is not recommended in the United States, with the exception of vitamin K in the newly delivered neonate (12) and—since 2005—vitamin D supplementation throughout infancy (13). However, WHO expert consultation on the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding (10) did acknowledge that data are insufficient to exclude the possibility of micronutrient deficiencies in some infants exclusively breastfed for 6 mo.

Thus, there has been a renewed effort to better understand the relationship between maternal micronutrient status and human milk quality, particularly in regions of the world where diet quality is poor (14). However, even for women in resource-rich settings, modern trends in diet and lifestyle may compromise human milk nutrient levels. For example, it was previously believed that only strict vegans were at risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency. However, recent studies have revealed that even lacto-ovo vegetarians and individuals who consume low amounts of meat (15) are at greater risk of vitamin B-12 deficiency compared with those consuming larger amounts of meat. Furthermore, current public health recommendations advise pregnant and lactating women to limit their consumption of seafood with high methylmercury levels (16) and for all individuals to minimize sun exposure, practices that may compromise the levels of (n-3) fatty acids (17) and vitamin D (18) in human milk, respectively. These contemporary issues highlight the need to better understand the impact of maternal dietary intake on human milk nutrient levels and the resultant infant functional outcomes. For some nutrients, the answers to these relationships are relatively well established; however, important knowledge gaps remain in our understanding of these relationships for select nutrients. Our expert panel was invited to address the current evidence and summarize emerging research with regard to human milk quality, focusing on the B vitamins, vitamin D, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).

Dr. Lindsay Allen (19) presents a global overview of B vitamin levels in human milk, how these levels are influenced by maternal diet and supplementation patterns, and the B vitamin status of infants breast-fed by mothers with inadequate B vitamin intake.

Drs. Adekunle Dawodu and Reginald Tsang (20) provide an overview of the interplay between the vitamin D status of the mother, her milk, and her infant in a contemporary, cross-national context. Their paper also highlights intriguing recent research evaluating maternal vitamin D supplementation as a means to improve the vitamin D status of infants in settings with very low maternal vitamin D levels.

Dr. Christina Valentine (21) presents a critical review of the literature addressing the relationship between maternal DHA intake and DHA levels in human milk, including the donor milk supply in the United States and the potential impact of human milk DHA content on functional outcomes in the preterm infant.

Although each of these authors has focused on addressing suboptimal human milk levels of select nutrients, these symposium proceedings should not be interpreted as reasons to disregard current recommendations to provide human milk as the sole source of nutrition for the first 6 mo of life. On the contrary, all 4 authors acknowledge the vitally important nutritional and immunological advantages of exclusive breastfeeding. In the instances in which human milk nutrient levels have been shown to be suboptimal, each author has highlighted emerging research on interventions designed to address the problem, primarily by improving maternal intake. It would be misguided to “solve” the problem of a nutrient deficiency in human milk by recommending human milk substitutes because this ignores the importance of exclusive breastfeeding in maximizing protection from infectious disease and improving child survival. By tackling the issue of human milk quality for select nutrients, this symposium provides a road map for future research focused on protecting and promoting human milk quality. Clearly, more research is needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of approaches used to address this challenging public health issue.

Acknowledgments

The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Footnotes

1Published as a supplement to Advances in Nutrition. Presented as part of the symposium entitled “Impact of Maternal Status on Breast Milk Quality and Infant Outcomes: An Update on Key Nutrients,” given at the Experimental Biology 2011 meeting, April 12, 2011, in Washington, DC. The symposium was sponsored by the American Society for Nutrition and supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Medela. The symposium was chaired by Laurie Nommsen-Rivers and Donna J. Chapman. Guest Editors for this symposium publication were Donna J. Chapman and Shelley McGuire. Guest Editor disclosure: Donna J. Chapman received travel support and compensation for editorial services provided for this symposium from the International Society for Research on Human Milk and Lactation. Shelley McGuire had no conflicts to disclose.

2Author disclosures: D.J. Chapman and L. Nommsen-Rivers, no conflicts of interest.

Literature Cited

1. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. In: Evidence report/technology assessment no 153. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. [PubMed]
2. Bartick M, Reinhold A. The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1048–56. [PubMed]
3. Hauck FR, Thompson JM, Tanabe KO, Moon RY, Vennemann MM. Breastfeeding and reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2011;128:103–10. [PubMed]
4. Chen A, Rogan WJ. Breastfeeding and the risk of postneonatal death in the United States. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e435–9. [PubMed]
5. Wright AL, Bauer M, Naylor A, Sutcliffe E, Clark L. Increasing breastfeeding rates to reduce infant illness at the community level. Pediatrics. 1998;101:837–44. [PubMed]
6. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HP, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371:417–40. [PubMed]
7. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O'Hare D, Schanler RJ, Eidelman AI. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115:496–506. [PubMed]
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The Surgeon General's call to action to support breastfeeding. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
9. Institute of Medicine Committee on Obesity Prevention Policies for Young Children Early childhood obesity prevention policies: goals, recommendations, and potential actions. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011.
10. World Health Organization The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: Report of an expert consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
11. World Health OrganizationInfant and young child nutrition. World Health Organization 2001, Fifty-fourth world health assembly:1–4.
12. Greer FR. Do breastfed infants need supplemental vitamins. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;48:415–23. [PubMed]
13. Wagner CL, Greer FR. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition Prevention of rickets and vitamin D deficiency in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1142–52. [PubMed]
14. Allen LH. Multiple micronutrients in pregnancy and lactation: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81: suppl:1206S–12S. [PubMed]
15. Herrmann W, Schorr H, Purschwitz K, Rassoul F, Richter V. Total homocysteine, vitamin B(12), and total antioxidant status in vegetarians. Clin Chem. 2001;47:1094–101. [PubMed]
16. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services Dietary guidelines for Americans. 7th ed. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2010.
17. Jensen CL, Lapillonne A. Docosahexaenoic acid and lactation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2009;81:175–8. [PubMed]
18. Saadi H, Dawodu A, Afandi B, Zayed R, Benedict S, Nagelkerke N, Hollis B. Effect of combined maternal and infant vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D status of exclusively breastfed infants. Matern Child Nutr. 2009;5:25–32. [PubMed]
19. Allen L. B vitamins in breast milk: Relative importance of maternal status and intake, and effects on infant status and function. Adv Nutr 2012;362–69.
20. Dawodu A, Tsang R. Maternal vitamin D status: Effect on milk vitamin D content and vitamin D status of breastfeeding infants. Adv Nutr 2012;353–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Valentine C. Maternal dietary DHA supplementation to improve inflammatory outcomes in the preterm infant. Adv Nutr 2012;370–76.

Articles from Advances in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of American Society for Nutrition