Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of iaiPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalIAI ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
Infect Immun. 2013 May; 81(5): 1696–1708.
PMCID: PMC3648002

AhrC and Eep Are Biofilm Infection-Associated Virulence Factors in Enterococcus faecalis

S. M. Payne, Editor


Enterococcus faecalis is part of the human intestinal microbiome and is a prominent cause of health care-associated infections. The pathogenesis of many E. faecalis infections, including endocarditis and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), is related to the ability of clinical isolates to form biofilms. To identify chromosomal genetic determinants responsible for E. faecalis biofilm-mediated infection, we used a rabbit model of endocarditis to test strains with transposon insertions or in-frame deletions in biofilm-associated loci: ahrC, argR, atlA, opuBC, pyrC, recN, and sepF. Only the ahrC mutant was significantly attenuated in endocarditis. We demonstrate that the transcriptional regulator AhrC and the protease Eep, which we showed previously to be an endocarditis virulence factor, are also required for full virulence in murine CAUTI. Therefore, AhrC and Eep can be classified as enterococcal biofilm-associated virulence factors. Loss of ahrC caused defects in early attachment and accumulation of biofilm biomass. Characterization of ahrC transcription revealed that the temporal expression of this locus observed in wild-type cells promotes initiation of early biofilm formation and the establishment of endocarditis. This is the first report of AhrC serving as a virulence factor in any bacterial species.


The role of biofilms in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases has received significant attention over the past decade (1, 2). Microbial biofilm infections are the result of a complex interplay between surface-associated microbes embedded in an extracellular matrix and attempts by the host immune defenses to clear these often chronic infections (3). Biofilm infections occur throughout the human body on both native and implanted prosthetic surfaces (4). Animal models to study biofilm infections experimentally are as abundant as the types of infections and the bacteria that cause them (5). Likewise, the plethora of experimental approaches used to define the genetic determinants of biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria with in vitro assays are too numerous to cite here. There remains, however, a paucity of knowledge on the relationship between the genetic basis of in vitro biofilm formation and virulence in biofilm infections.

Enterococcus faecalis, a Gram-positive constituent of the human intestinal microbiome, has become a prominent pathogen of health care-associated infections (HAIs) over the past 3 decades. Between 1980 and 2008, the frequency of HAIs caused by E. faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, the other frequently encountered enterococcal pathogen, increased by 8.8% (6). E. faecalis and E. faecium infections together accounted for 16.0% of central line-associated bloodstream HAIs, 14.9% of catheter-associated urinary tract HAIs, and 11.2% of surgical site HAIs reported to the United States National Healthcare Safety Network in 2006 and 2007 (7). E. faecalis is also the primary causative agent of enterococcal endocarditis (8, 9), an infection of the heart valves, which is the second leading cause of infective endocarditis in North America and the fourth worldwide (10). Enterococcal endocarditis is more prevalent than nonenterococcal endocarditis in cancer patients and is associated with an overall mortality rate of 11 to 22% (8, 9).

Biofilm formation on the surfaces of medically implantable prosthetic devices (e.g., central lines and urinary catheters) or host tissues (e.g., damaged heart valves) underlies the pathogenesis of most enterococcal infections (11). Established animal models of endocarditis and urinary tract infection (UTI), which both manifest from biofilm etiologies, have been used to study E. faecalis virulence (1216). E. faecalis has multiple surface proteins, such as Ebp pili and Ace, that act as adhesins to bind to host cells and proteins, which resultantly promotes in vitro biofilm formation and virulence in models of endocarditis and UTI (11). Recently, we reported that Eep, an intramembrane protease, is also an endocarditis virulence factor (13). While an eep in-frame deletion mutant can attach to surfaces and form biofilms in vitro, we showed that early stage biofilms formed by this strain have an altered cell distribution phenotype. We further demonstrated that the endocarditis attenuation phenotype could be successfully complemented in vivo by expression of eep from a plasmid that was lost from the majority of bacteria during the course of the experimental infection. These data support the hypothesis that Eep is also important during early heart valve infection (13). However, the contribution of Eep to other biofilm infections and its function in enterococcal pathogenesis remain unknown.

E. faecalis OG1RF is a well-characterized strain that has demonstrated virulence in animal models despite lacking the plasmids and mobile genetic elements known to harbor classical enterococcal virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes (17, 18). Conserved genes in OG1RF are likely to be present in the genomes of other pathogenic E. faecalis strains (19), which makes the strain particularly useful for studying the biological contributions of chromosomal genes in the absence of extraneous chromosomal or extrachromosomal genetic elements. Our group previously screened an OG1RF random mini-mariner transposon insertion library containing approximately 15,000 clones to identify genetic determinants in the E. faecalis core genome that are necessary for biofilm formation in a standard microtiter plate biofilm assay (20). Ten distinct biofilm-associated loci were identified from 25 biofilm-defective transposon insertion mutants. Of these, srtA, coding for the housekeeping sortase, and the ebp pilus genes and their associated sortase gene, srtC, have also been implicated in enterococcal virulence (12, 16, 21, 22). In contrast, disruption of the major autolysin gene (atlA), an important mediator of DNA release during biofilm formation in vitro (23), did not result in reduced virulence in either peritonitis (24) or catheter-associated urinary tract infection (12). To the best of our knowledge, the other seven loci have not been studied directly in virulence models. We also used recombinase-based in vivo expression technology (RIVET) to identify promoters that are upregulated in E. faecalis OG1RF during in vitro biofilm growth (25). No common genes were found between the transposon and biofilm RIVET screens, but the screens were complementary in that there were four genomic regions with two adjacent genes where one gene was identified in the RIVET screen and the other gene was identified in the transposon screen. Two genes with transposon insertions encode transcriptional regulators, suggesting the possibility of regulatory interactions between these and the adjacent genes that were identified in the RIVET screen (25).

The ability to form biofilms is common among E. faecalis isolates of clinical origin (26, 27), but a broad analysis to identify the genetic loci on the E. faecalis chromosome that are responsible for biofilm-associated infection has not been undertaken. We postulated that screening the potential biofilm determinants identified in our previous genetic screens for roles in virulence in an animal model of biofilm infection would lead to the discovery of new biofilm-associated virulence factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify biofilm formation genes in E. faecalis OG1RF that contribute to the pathogenesis of endocarditis. To that end, we tested whether five of the biofilm-defective transposon insertion mutants (20) were attenuated in a rabbit model of endocarditis. In addition, we sought to test whether the complementary outcome of the combined results of our previous transposon and RIVET screens predicted regulatory interactions among biofilm-associated genes (25). To do this, we characterized the biofilm formation and endocarditis virulence phenotypes of two strains with in-frame deletions of genes identified in our RIVET screen that are adjacent to the two biofilm-associated ArgR family transcriptional regulators identified in the transposon screen. We show here that the E. faecalis ortholog of the ArgR family transcription factor AhrC is an important early biofilm gene product that is necessary for endocarditis virulence. Our data further reveal that AhrC and Eep, the endocarditis virulence factor we recently identified (13), are also important for virulence in an experimental biofilm infection model of catheter-associated UTI. Overall, the data presented in this study demonstrate that novel virulence factors with important in vivo functions can be identified from in vitro functional screens.


Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and chemicals.

E. faecalis strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. faecalis was routinely cultivated in brain heart infusion broth (BHI) (BD Bacto; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) or on BHI agar under static conditions at 37°C in ambient air. Cultures for endocarditis experiments were grown in trypsinized beef heart dialysate (BH) medium (28) under static conditions at 37°C with 7% CO2. Tryptic soy broth without added dextrose (TSB-dex; Becton, Dickinson, and Company) was used for biofilm assays. M9-YE glucose medium (29) was used to grow cells for Western blot experiments. Escherichia coli strains DH5α and EC1000 were used for plasmid construction and propagation and were grown in LB and BHI, respectively. Antibiotics were added as necessary to select and maintain plasmids.

Table 1
Enterococcus faecalis strains and oligonucleotides used in this study

Nisin, erythromycin, carbenicillin, and kanamycin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Stock solutions of nisin at 25 μg/ml in water, erythromycin at 50 mg/ml in methanol, carbenicillin at 50 mg/ml in water, and kanamycin at 100 mg/ml in water were prepared and stored at −20°C. All restriction enzymes were purchased from New England BioLabs (Ipswich, MA). PfuUltra II fusion DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) or Taq DNA polymerase with Thermopol buffer (New England BioLabs) was used in PCRs for strain and plasmid construction. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) or Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) and are listed in Table 1.

Strain construction.

The in-frame markerless deletion of the recN (EF0984) locus was previously described in an OG1RF(pCF10) strain (25). The same constructs and procedures were used in this study to generate a pCF10-free version of OG1RF ΔrecN. OG1RF ΔopuBC (EF0675) was constructed using the previously described allelic exchange method (30). The deletion construct used for allelic exchange was generated with overlap-extension PCR by first amplifying two ~1-kb fragments from OG1RF genomic DNA with primer pairs 0674 Xba F/Delta 0675 R and Delta 0675 F/0677 R SphI. The two products were annealed together, and second step amplification was performed with primers 0674 XbaI F and 0677 R SphI. The resulting product was digested with enzymes XbaI and SphI, ligated into pCJK47 (30) predigested with the same enzymes, and propagated in E. coli EC1000 grown on BHI with 100 μg/ml erythromycin. Deletion of either locus had no effect on growth (data not shown).

The OG1RF ΩahrC-p23ahrCKI strain was generated by allelic exchange using pCJK141, a derivative of pCJK47 that facilitates integration of constructs into the OG1RF chromosome between the convergently transcribed genes EF1117 and EF1116 (31). The 196-nucleotide intragenic region between EF1117 and EF1116 contains a stem-loop transcriptional terminator (32), which has been duplicated in the cloning site of pCJK141 so that sequences integrated into the chromosome are flanked by terminators to prevent transcriptional read-through in either direction. To generate the knock-in p23 construct, the ahrC gene—including its native ribosome binding site (RBS)—was PCR amplified from OG1RF genomic DNA using primer pair 0983 RBS BamHI F/0983 st cod NcoI R, and ligated into pCJK141 at the BamHI and NcoI restriction sites in the multiple cloning site of the vector. A PCR product containing the p23 promoter, originally from Lactococcus sp. (33), was generated with primer pair NotI P23/BamHI P23 and was introduced upstream of ahrC in pCJK141 at the NotI and BamHI restriction sites.

Rabbit model of experimental endocarditis.

Endocarditis infections were carried out as previously described (34). Briefly, one to three colonies of each strain were inoculated into BH medium and grown overnight. Cultures of OG1RF ΩahrC+ahrC also contained 10 μg/ml erythromycin and 25 ng/ml nisin. Cells were pelleted and resuspended to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 in potassium phosphate-buffered saline (KPBS), corresponding to ~2 × 109 to 4 × 109 CFU/ml. Following surgery to mechanically damage the aortic valve (34), 2 ml was administered intravenously via the marginal ear vein to initiate infection. Rabbits were euthanized 4 days after infection, and the hearts were removed and dissected to expose the aortic valve. Vegetations and valve leaflets were harvested, weighed, homogenized in 1 ml of Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) or KPBS, serially diluted, and plated on BHI agar to quantify bacteria. Homogenates from animals infected with OG1RF ΩahrC+ahrC were also plated on BHI agar containing 10 μg/ml erythromycin to determine the percentage of cells that retained the complementation vector for the duration of the infection.

Endocarditis results were analyzed for statistical significance with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests in GraphPad Prism (version 5.04; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA).

Murine model of CAUTI.

OG1RF, OG1RF ΩahrC, and OG1RF Δeep were tested in a mouse model of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) as previously described (12). Briefly, ~1 × 107 bacteria were inoculated into C57BL/6Ncr female mice that had silicone catheter pieces implanted in their bladders. Eight to 10 mice were infected per strain. Animals were euthanized 24 h postinfection by cervical dislocation, and then catheter implants, bladders, and kidney pairs were harvested. Bacterial counts from implants, bladders, and kidney pairs were obtained as previously described (12). The limits of detection (LOD) were 20 CFU per implant and 40 CFU per bladder or pair of kidneys. Implants or organs with bacterial counts below the LOD were assigned the LOD value for statistical calculations. The experiment was repeated once, and the results were pooled. Only mice from which implants were recovered at the time of sacrifice were included in the final analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test in GraphPad Prism was used to assess statistical significance.

Microtiter plate biofilm assay.

Microtiter plate biofilm assays were based on a previously described protocol, with minor changes (35). Briefly, three colonies per strain were inoculated into 2-ml BHI cultures and grown overnight. Cultures were diluted 1:100 in TSB-dex, and 100 μl of each diluted strain was pipetted into 8 wells of a 96-well plate (Costar 3595; Corning, Inc., Corning, NY). All cultures of OG1RF ΩahrC+ahrC also contained 10 μg/ml erythromycin and 25 ng/ml nisin. Wells with sterile medium were used as blanks. Plates were statically incubated at 37°C for 6 or 24 h in a humid container. Culture turbidity was assessed following incubation by reading the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) on a Modulus microplate multimode reader (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA). The medium was removed, wells were washed three times with 100 μl water, and plates were dried in an inverted position for at least 4 h. Wells were stained with 100 μl of 0.1% safranin for 20 min, and then the stain was removed and wells were washed five times with water and dried for at least 4 h. The safranin stain was quantified by reading the optical density of dried wells at 450 nm. Three to six biological replicates were performed for each strain. The OD450 values for all biological replicates were averaged together and reported as percent biofilm formation relative to OG1RF, which was set to 100%.

Biofilm microscopy.

E. faecalis OG1RF and ΩahrC biofilms were inoculated at a 1:50 dilution from overnight cultures and grown on Aclar fluoropolymer coupons for 6 h and washed for imaging as previously described (13). Coupons were stained with an Alexa Fluor 594-wheat germ agglutinin conjugate (Invitrogen) and fixed in 2% methanol-free formaldehyde with 6% sucrose added to avoid hypoosmolality. Coupons were rinsed in PBS and mounted in Vectashield Hardset (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) with coverslip spacers to avoid mechanical compression of the biofilm. Biofilm imaging was done using a 20× 0.75 NA objective using an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera (Cascade 1024; Photometrics, Tucson, AZ). Image stacks were collected at 0.5-μm intervals in wide-field immunofluorescence mode and deconvolved with the Huygens software package (SVI, Hilversum, The Netherlands). The COMSTAT2 analysis package (36, 37) was used to provide quantification of the ahrC mutant biomass defect; reported results are from four independent stacks taken on each of 10 biological replicates for both the mutant and wild-type strains. Maximum-intensity projections of the mean image stacks and surface renderings of representative stacks were also generated (Huygens software package).

Gene expression experiments.

For growth curves, overnight cultures of OG1RF were diluted 1:1,000 into 100 ml of fresh BHI and grown statically at 37°C. Aliquots were collected at 0, 3.16, 4.1, 5.3, 6.5, and 8.25 h after inoculation for quantitation by serial dilution and plating. Cells for RNA extraction were harvested at 3.16 h and all following time points by measuring the optical density of the culture at 600 nm and then calculating the volume required to reach the equivalent of 0.6 ml at an OD600 of 1.0. The calculated volume of cells was pelleted, resuspended in KPBS, and treated with RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Three biological replicates were performed. For biofilms, overnight cultures of OG1RF were diluted 1:100 into TSB-dex, and then 3-ml aliquots were placed into 6-well dishes (Costar 3516; Corning, Inc.) and shaken at ~125 rpm for 6 or 22 h at 37°C. After incubation, planktonic cells were pooled and aliquots were collected for cell counts or treated with RNAprotect bacterial reagent for subsequent RNA extraction. Biofilms were gently washed twice with 1 ml KPBS and then manually removed with a cell scraper into 1 ml KPBS, which was transferred to each successive well in order to pool all biofilms grown in a single dish. Six wells were pooled for 6-h biofilms, and five wells were pooled for 22-h biofilms. Due to loss of volume during transfer, the final volume of pooled cells was adjusted to 1 ml with KPBS. One hundred microliters was kept for cell counts prior to adding the remainder to RNAprotect bacterial reagent. Planktonic cells were collected from five biological replicates. Biofilm cells were collected from six biological replicates.

All cell pellets treated with RNAprotect bacterial reagent were kept frozen until RNA extraction, which was performed as previously described (13). One microgram of each RNA was treated with Turbo DNA-free (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the “Rigorous protocol” as directed by the manufacturer. cDNA was synthesized from 9 μl of DNase-treated RNA with random hexamer primers using the Superscript III first-strand synthesis system for reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (Invitrogen). cDNA was diluted 5-fold for growth curve time points and 2-fold for 6-h planktonic and biofilm samples and was used undiluted for 22-h planktonic and biofilm samples. One microliter of diluted or undiluted cDNA was used per 25-μl reaction mixture with iQ SYBR green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) and 10 μM each primer. Reaction mixtures containing ~12 ng of DNase-treated RNA were prepared to confirm successful removal of contaminating DNA. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out on an iQ5 iCycler real-time detection system (Bio-Rad). Each reaction was performed in triplicate, and threshold cycle values were averaged.

Primers used in qPCR and for generating copy number standards are listed in Table 1. Absolute quantification of transcript copy number was calculated by interpolating threshold cycle values against standard curves, as described previously for Staphylococcus aureus (38). To prepare the standard curves, the gelE and ahrC genes were PCR amplified in standard PCRs using Taq polymerase with primer pairs gelE ORF-F/gelE ORF-R and EF0983-F/EF0983-R, respectively. PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and propagated in E. coli DH5α on LB containing 50 μg/ml carbenicillin. Ten-fold dilutions of plasmid DNA prepared with the QIAprep spin miniprep kit (Qiagen, Inc.) were used as the templates in qPCR standard curve amplification reactions. For cDNAs that were diluted prior to qPCR, copy numbers were multiplied by the dilution factor to calculate the copy number per μl of undiluted cDNA. Since unequal numbers of cells were harvested from planktonic/biofilm experiments, the relative gene expression was calculated by dividing the copy number per μl of cDNA by the corresponding CFU/ml count.

Recombinant His-tagged AhrC purification, antisera, and Western blots.

The ahrC gene, including its native ribosome binding site, was PCR amplified and ligated into the pET28b(+) expression vector (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). The resulting plasmid was used to express and purify the recombinant His-tagged protein in E. coli BL21 cells under the growth conditions used for the purification of other E. faecalis proteins (39). Briefly, an overnight culture of BL21 carrying the expression vector was diluted 1:100 into LB containing 50 μg/ml kanamycin and shaken at 30°C until cells reached an OD600 of 0.7. IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) was added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and the cells were incubated for 4 h. Protein was purified as previously described (40) and eluted in buffer containing 200 mM imidazole, 30 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 M NaCl, and 10% glycerol. The protein was dialyzed overnight at 4°C in elution buffer lacking imidazole.

Polyclonal antisera against recombinant AhrC protein was generated in a New Zealand White rabbit using standard procedures. The rabbit was immunized three times at 2-week intervals with 10 μg purified recombinant His-tagged AhrC per injection.

Cultures of M9-YE inoculated with three colonies of OG1RF, OG1RF ΩahrC, or OG1RF ΩahrC-p23ahrCKI were grown overnight at 37°C and then diluted 1:10 or 1:100 and grown for 2 more hours. Whole-cell lysates were prepared from aliquots of cells harvested from overnight (stationary) or 2-h (exponential) cultures normalized to an OD600 of 1. Pelleted bacteria were resuspended in TES buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], 25% sucrose) containing 15 mg/ml lysozyme and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Cell lysis supernatants were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using standard protocols. Separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, which were blocked overnight with 10% milk in KPBS–0.1% Tween 20 at 4°C. Membranes were probed at room temperature for 1 to 2 h with a 1:4,000 dilution of the polyclonal anti-AhrC antiserum in blocking solution, washed with KPBS–0.1% Tween 20, and secondarily probed with a 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-goat antirabbit IgG (H+L) antibody (Zymed; Invitrogen) in blocking solution for 1 to 2.5 h. Washed membranes were treated with the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions and exposed to film or a chemiluminescent imaging documentation system to detect signals. Two to three biological replicates were performed for each strain. Band densitometry was performed with ImageJ software (version 1.46r).


Biofilm-associated mutants tested in this study.

To test the hypothesis that enterococcal biofilm determinants are virulence factors in endocarditis, we chose seven loci (Table 1) in the chromosome of E. faecalis OG1RF that were associated with biofilm formation in our previous studies (20, 25). The following five loci were disrupted with transposon insertions: EF0676, EF0799, EF0983, EF0999, and EF1718. The other two loci, EF0675 and EF0984, were removed from the chromosome as in-frame deletions generated by allelic exchange. Aside from EF0799, the functions of the selected loci in enterococcal biofilm formation or virulence have not been characterized. EF0799, which encodes the autolysin AtlA (also called Atn), has biofilm-associated functions (23, 41) but does not contribute to virulence in peritonitis or UTI models (12, 24). The phenotype of an atlA-deficient strain in endocarditis has not been reported previously.

EF0984 and EF1718 are annotated in the E. faecalis V583 genome sequence available through the J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI) as encoding the highly conserved orthologs of DNA repair protein RecN (recN gene) and dihydroorotase (pyrC gene), respectively. Gene assignments for the remaining loci were made based on amino acid sequence homologies (Table 2). EF0675 encodes a glycine betaine/choline-binding protein of an ABC-type transporter that is highly similar to the opuBC gene annotated in Streptococcus mutans; we have designated EF0675 as the opuBC ortholog of E. faecalis. EF0999 is annotated as a conserved hypothetical protein in strain V583 and a hypothetical protein in the E. faecalis OG1RF genome sequence (GenBank accession no. CP002621.1) housed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), but contains a conserved region of homology in its C-terminal half that is found in the sepF loci of other Gram-positive microbes. Thus, we have designated EF0999 as the sepF ortholog (also called ylmF) in E. faecalis OG1RF. SepF/YlmF has been shown to associate with FtsZ during cell division in Bacillus subtilis (42, 43).

Table 2
Gene assignments based on amino acid homology for previously unassigned E. faecalis loci tested in this study

The loci disrupted in transposon insertion mutants ΩEF0676 and ΩEF0983 encode related ArgR/AhrC family transcriptional regulators. As indicated in Table 2, the amino acid sequence of EF0676 is most similar to ArgR of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363, while that of EF0983 is most similar to AhrC of the same Lactococcus strain (44). In addition, EF0983 is adjacent to the open reading frame (ORF) encoding recN, which is a conserved genomic organization found in other Gram-positive bacteria (45). EF0676 is annotated as the arginine repressor argR in the E. faecalis V583 genome sequence at JCVI, but was generically assigned the gene symbol argR2 (locus OG1RF_10413) in the OG1RF genome at NCBI. Likewise, EF0983 has been assigned the gene symbol argR3 (locus OG1RF_10717) in the NCBI OG1RF genome annotation. There are two additional ArgR-like transcription factors in the OG1RF genome, encoded by the adjacent, but divergent, loci EF0102 and EF0103. These genes lie immediately upstream of the arginine catabolism genes and were referred to as argR2 and argR1, respectively, in an older study (46). Due to the high sequence homology and conserved genome organization with species in which these genes have been characterized, we believe the most accurate gene names for EF0676 and EF0983 are argR and ahrC, respectively, and refer to them as such herein.

Characterization of the role of biofilm determinants in early biofilm biomass accumulation.

The transposon mutants chosen for this study were previously shown to be deficient for biofilm formation using a microtiter plate biofilm assay that primarily evaluates initial attachment and early biomass accumulation (20). The time points at which the transposon strains' defects affect biofilm formation prior to the 24-h assay endpoint are not known. In addition, the phenotypes of the two in-frame deletion mutants (Table 1) in the microtiter plate biofilm assay are unknown. This led us to test the seven strains for biofilm formation at 6 and 24 h.

Defects in biofilm biomass accumulation by the transposon mutants at 24 h (Fig. 1) were consistent with our previous results (20), except that the ΩsepF strain produced more biofilm than in our previous report (20). At 6 h, the biofilm biomass value for ΩsepF was only slightly lower than the same value for OG1RF (Fig. 1). The biofilm biomasses of the other four transposon mutants fell below the line at 75% biofilm biomass relative to OG1RF, which was the level we previously used to define reduced biofilm formation (20). The early biofilm defect was most pronounced for the ΩargR and ΩahrC transcription factor mutants, suggesting these strains are deficient in initial attachment in this experimental system. The early biofilm defect was fully restored (Fig. 1) by expression of the ahrC ORF from both an inducible promoter on a plasmid, as was previously shown for 24-h biofilms (20), and the constitutive lactococcal p23 promoter integrated into the chromosome at an ectopic site (described further below).

Fig 1
Characterization of the role of biofilm determinants in biofilm biomass accumulation at 6 and 24 h. Biofilm biomass accumulation after 6 (black bars) and 24 (white bars) h in a microtiter plate biofilm assay was measured for E. faecalis wild-type strain ...

The ΔopuBC and ΔrecN strains both produced biofilms at near-wild-type levels at 24 h (data not shown). These results are consistent with the biofilm formation phenotypes of three other in-frame deletion strains, including Δeep, that were characterized subsequent to the corresponding genes being identified in our previous RIVET studies (13). At 6 h, biofilm formation for the ΔopuBC and ΔrecN strains was equivalent to that of the wild type. The Δeep strain, which was included in Fig. 1 for comparison, also showed no early biofilm formation defects in the microtiter plate biofilm assay (13).

Role of biofilm determinants in endocarditis virulence.

We next evaluated the seven strains for virulence in a rabbit model of endocarditis, as measured by the bacterial load recovered from harvested valve leaflets and vegetations that formed after 4 days of infection (Fig. 2). Initial infections using 3 to 5 animals per strain were carried out in order to determine whether any strains retained wild-type virulence levels. Those lacking discernible decreases in valve bacterial loads after initial testing were not used in additional infection experiments, and the data from the initial tests are shown in Fig. 2. Strains that showed reduced bacterial loads were tested in additional animals, as indicated in Fig. 2. The mean valve bacterial loads of the ΩatlA and ΩpyrC strains were slightly higher than that for OG1RF. The ΔopuBC, ΩargR, ΔrecN, and ΩsepF strains had mean valve bacterial loads that were 1 to 2 log10 CFU lower than that for OG1RF. These values were not found to be significantly different from those for OG1RF in a statistical analysis. The ΩahrC mutant mean valve bacterial load was significantly reduced compared to that of OG1RF. Interestingly, three in-frame deletion mutants, the ΔebrA, ΔproB, and Δeep strains, which we previously tested in the same model system (13), showed a similar spread of mean valve bacterial loads (indicated in Fig. 2). Valve bacterial loads for the ΩahrC and Δeep strains were both reduced by more than 4 log10 CFU compared to OG1RF (P < 0.05). Of the 10 total strains with mutations in biofilm-associated genes evaluated between this study and our previous work, the ΩahrC and Δeep strains both had altered in vitro biofilm formation phenotypes (Fig. 1) (13) and were the most highly attenuated in endocarditis. These results show that certain enterococcal biofilm-associated genes are also important for virulence in a biofilm-associated infection.

Fig 2
Role of biofilm determinants in experimental endocarditis virulence. Aortic valve leaflets and vegetations from rabbits in which E. faecalis endocarditis had been induced were harvested, homogenized, and plated to enumerate bacteria at 4 days postinoculation. ...

As we previously demonstrated with the Δeep mutant strain (13), expression of the ahrC ORF from an inducible promoter on a plasmid enhanced the ΩahrC endocarditis virulence phenotype (Fig. 2). The mean valve bacterial load of the complementation strain was 1.6 log10 CFU lower than that of OG1RF. This may be due in part to the lack of inducing agent required for maximal continued expression of the ORF and the absence of antibiotic selection required for plasmid maintenance in the host environment. Indeed, the complementation plasmid was only retained in 2.6% ± 3.3% (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) of cells by the end of the 4-day infection. These data are consistent with a model in which the functional role of AhrC in endocarditis occurs primarily during the early stages of infection. In light of the instability of the complementation plasmid, we generated a derivative of the ΩahrC strain in which the ahrC ORF was integrated in the chromosome in single copy and expressed under the control of the constitutive lactococcal p23 promoter (33). When this strain was tested in endocarditis (Fig. 2), we were surprised to find that the strain was as attenuated as ΩahrC. Based on these results, we suspect that temporal regulation of the wild-type ahrC locus is necessary for virulence. Comparative analysis of ahrC expression from the wild-type and p23 promoters is presented below.

Evaluation of biofilm-associated endocarditis virulence factors in an experimental model of CAUTI.

To test if ahrC and eep are important for virulence in a nonendocarditis biofilm infection model, we tested the two mutant strains in a recently established mouse model of enterococcal CAUTI (12). Bacterial counts determined from the bladders, kidneys, and catheter implants of mice after 24 h of infection are shown in Fig. 3. OG1RF was recovered at ~106 CFU from implants and bladders and ~104 CFU from the kidneys. The CFU levels of the Δeep mutant recovered from bladders were similar to those of OG1RF, while the levels recovered from implant surfaces were more variable. The median Δeep CFU counts from homogenized kidneys were 1 log lower than the OG1RF kidney CFU counts, which was a statistically significant difference; no bacteria were recovered for three animals in this cohort. ΩahrC CFU counts were reduced by statistically significant amounts in the bladder and kidneys and on the implants. ΩahrC was particularly defective in colonizing the kidneys, as CFU counts were above the limit of detection in only 5 of 14 mice (36%). The outcome of the CAUTI experiments indicates that ahrC, and to a lesser extent, eep, are also important for urovirulence.

Fig 3
Enterococcal biofilm determinants important for endocarditis contribute to virulence in an experimental model of CAUTI. The graphs indicate the log10 CFU recovered from retrieved catheter implants (A), homogenized bladders (B), and homogenized kidneys ...

Microscopic characterization of early-time-point ΩahrC biofilms.

Since ahrC is an important contributor to the virulence of two biofilm-associated infections, we used immunofluorescence microscopy to study the mutant strain's biofilm defect in detail. The maximum intensity projections of mean image stacks obtained from biofilms of OG1RF and the ΩahrC strain grown for 6 h, which are shown in Fig. 4, demonstrate a significant defect in ΩahrC strain biomass (Fig. 4A) compared to that of a matched OG1RF sample (Fig. 4B). The mean biomass difference is approximately 4-fold via quantitative COMSTAT2 analysis (data not shown) (P = 0.001 by Student's t test). The ΩahrC defect was even more visually pronounced when the microscopy data were viewed as surface projections (Fig. 4C and andD):D): in addition to the overall biomass defect (Fig. 4C), 6-h ΩahrC strain biofilms failed to produce mature microcolonies compared to OG1RF biofilms (Fig. 4D).

Fig 4
ΩahrC biofilms display a profound biomass defect in early biofilms. OG1RF and ΩahrC biofilms were grown on Aclar fluoropolymer coupons for 6 h. Biofilms were stained with an Alexa Fluor 594-wheat germ agglutinin conjugate and imaged as ...

ahrC is maximally expressed during exponential phase.

We characterized expression of the ahrC locus during batch-phase growth and in biofilms to investigate further the idea that this gene is involved in early steps of biofilm formation and the pathogenesis of biofilm infections. In batch culture, the absolute copy number of ahrC transcripts was the highest between 3 and 5 h of growth, which correlated with the exponential growth phase (Fig. 5A). ahrC transcript copy numbers fell off sharply following entry into the stationary phase, dropping by 1 log between the 5.3- and 6.5-h time points. Notably, the expression profile of ahrC is distinct from that of gelE (Fig. 5A), which encodes the secreted protease gelatinase that is produced in postexponential phase as a result of activation of the quorum-sensing fsr gene cluster (47).

Fig 5
E. faecalis OG1RF ahrC expression at the RNA and protein levels. (A) Gene expression in batch culture. Aliquots of OG1RF cells growing in BHI were collected at the indicated time points and processed for quantitation by serial dilution and plating or ...

The relative levels of expression of ahrC and gelE were the same in biofilm cells [average ± SD, (8.3 ± 2.7) × 108 CFU/ml] and planktonic cells (2.5 × 108 ± 8.6 × 107 CFU/ml) harvested from the same wells after 6 h of growth (Fig. 5B). Consistent with the data in Fig. 5A showing a decline in ahrC transcript levels over time, ahrC transcripts could not be detected in either planktonic [(6.8 ± 4.5) × 108 CFU/ml] and biofilm [(6.0 ± 2.2) × 108 CFU/ml] cells after 22 h of growth. In contrast, gelE transcripts were detected in planktonic and biofilm cells at 22 h.

Using a polyclonal antiserum raised against recombinant histidine-tagged AhrC, a strong immunoreactive protein band of the expected size was detected in exponential- and stationary-phase OG1RF whole-cell lysates, but not in exponential- or stationary-phase ΩahrC cell lysates (Fig. 5C). The amount of AhrC in stationary-phase OG1RF preparations was calculated by densitometry to be reduced approximately 25% relative to that in exponential-phase cells. AhrC was highly overexpressed in ΩahrC-p23ahrCKI exponential- and stationary-phase cells compared to OG1RF cells (Fig. 5C), suggesting that the p23 promoter is much stronger than the native ahrC promoter under the conditions we analyzed.


Initial and irreversible attachment of bacteria to surfaces, followed by biomass accumulation, are the imperative first steps in the progression of biofilm formation (48). In endocarditis, blood-borne bacteria attach to host-derived collagen, fibrin, platelets, and occasionally red or white blood cells, to form vegetations at sites of damaged cardiac endothelium. Similarly, in CAUTI, bacteria in the urogenital tract interact with host proteins that adhere to the surfaces of urinary catheters. E. faecalis has many well-studied surface adhesins that likely facilitate the initial binding phases of heart valve vegetation formation or urinary catheter colonization, but other genes must be involved to coordinate the additional processes, such as extracellular matrix formation, immune evasion, and cell-to-cell communication, that lead to biomass accumulation and the subsequent proliferation of an established biofilm in vivo. It has been reported that E. faecalis endocarditis isolates make more biofilm biomass than nonendocarditis isolates in in vitro assays (27), but no strong linkages have been found between biofilm formation and the presence of various virulence factors in endocarditis and other clinical isolates (26, 49). Conversely, it has remained largely undefined to this point whether enterococcal biofilm genetic determinants correlate with virulence functions.

A major goal of this study was to determine whether gene function in biofilm formation is predictive of a function in endocarditis virulence. Since bacterial attachment to damaged heart valves is a critical step in the onset of infection, the majority of the seven strains we tested had transposon insertions in genes that affected 24-h biofilm formation in an assay that evaluates attachment (20). Although all of the transposon insertion mutants exhibited reduced early biofilm formation relative to OG1RF (Fig. 1), only the strain with a transposon disruption in the ahrC gene, encoding a transcriptional regulator, was highly attenuated in the endocarditis model (Fig. 2). AhrC was recently reported to regulate virulence gene expression in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (45), but it was not tested for a direct role in virulence. The data presented here represent the first description of AhrC serving as a virulence factor in any bacterial pathogen.

The two chromosomal in-frame deletion strains, which had deletions in RIVET-identified genes (25) that were adjacent to either of the ArgR family transcriptional regulators identified as biofilm determinants in the transposon screen (20), were not impaired in biofilm formation or endocarditis virulence (Fig. 1 and and2,2, respectively). These data do not support our hypothesis that the combined results of the transposon and RIVET screens reveal transcriptional regulatory networks. The genes deleted in these strains may have functions in infection or biofilm formation that are redundant with other genetic determinants, such that their phenotypes are masked in the assays used here. This precise type of effect has been reported with streptococcal adhesins (50, 51).

In combination with our previous work (13), we found that only 2 of the 10 biofilm-associated genes screened in the endocarditis model had significant roles in virulence. Five of the mutants tested between the two studies demonstrated an intermediate phenotype marked by valve bacterial loads that were nonsignificantly reduced by 1 to 2 log10 CFU relative to OG1RF (Fig. 2). The remaining three mutants had the same phenotype as OG1RF. It is noteworthy that the atlA disruption mutant displayed a wild-type virulence phenotype in endocarditis, which adds to previously published evidence that the major autolysin is not specifically relevant in virulence (12, 24), despite the availability of detailed knowledge about its mechanism in in vitro biofilm formation (Fig. 6) (20, 23, 41). From these results, we conclude that there is not a strong association between biofilm formation ability in static attachment assays and endocarditis virulence. Our group recently reported that the processes of E. faecalis adherence and biofilm formation on ex vivo porcine cardiac valves proceed faster than on cellulose membranes (52). The interactions between bacteria and the host milieu that occur during in vivo biofilm formation are substantially more complex than the processes that result in biofilm formation in standard laboratory assays, such as the microtiter plate biofilm assay. The fact that the majority of the mutant strains tested in our combined studies exhibited either significant attenuation (n = 2) or had mean valve bacterial loads that were 1 to 2 log10 CFU lower than those of the wild type (n = 5) strongly indicates that the genetic basis of virulence in the endocarditis model is multifactorial. Some genes, such as ahrC and eep, are major contributors to the infection process, while a plethora of others serve more modest, and possibly functionally redundant, roles that act together to maximize the full virulence potential of E. faecalis. The absence of any mutants that were wholly unable to colonize and persist at the heart valve for the duration of a 4-day infection further supports the hypothesis that full endocarditis virulence results from the combined functions of multiple genetic determinants. Although it is impossible to predict how many genes contribute to endocarditis virulence, the E. faecalis strain INY3000 has four mapped Tn916 insertions in its genome and is avirulent in endocarditis (5355).

Fig 6
The biofilm genes ahrC and eep, but not atlA, are also virulence factors in biofilm-associated infections. The steps at which AhrC, AtlA, and Eep contribute to the process of biofilm formation are indicated (left). The center column illustrates the characterized ...

Regardless of the low correlation between in vitro biofilm formation and virulence, this work resulted in the identification of two virulence factors that are important contributors in two animal models of biofilm-associated infection (Fig. 6). The eep and ahrC genes encode proteins that have dramatically different cellular functions. The in vitro biofilm phenotypes of the Δeep and ΩahrC strains display significantly different phenotypes: under in vitro conditions, the Δeep strain makes strong biofilms with an aberration in cell and matrix distribution (13, 56), while the data we report here indicate that the ΩahrC mutant is defective in early attachment (Fig. 1) and biomass accumulation (Fig. 4). Despite this, disruption of either locus resulted in similar attenuated phenotypes in the rabbit endocarditis model (Fig. 2) (13). When assayed in a mouse model of CAUTI (Fig. 3), we found that ΩahrC performed far worse in all variables tested than Δeep did, although Δeep was impaired in kidney colonization relative to OG1RF. A major difference between these two models is the presence of a foreign body in the CAUTI model, while the endocarditis model involves biofilm formation on a native host surface. The results from the infection models confirm that the pathogenesis of biofilm-associated infections differs from model to model. Given that only the ΩahrC strain has an in vitro attachment defect, it may be that the mechanism of attachment employed during in vitro biofilm formation is also relevant to CAUTI pathogenesis, while other mechanisms are at play in endocarditis. Overall, these experiments demonstrate that two major enterococcal endocarditis virulence factors may be more generally classified as virulence factors of biofilm-associated infections.

Since building a biofilm is a multistep process, the genes that are involved may act at one or more of the many steps along the progression of biofilm establishment and maturation (Fig. 6). This work demonstrates that disabling a strain such that it can no longer proceed through these steps may or may not correlate with adverse effects in establishing a biofilm-related infection. For example, loss of AtlA impairs microcolony formation but does not reduce virulence in biofilm-mediated infections (Fig. 2 and and6)6) (12), while deletion of Eep imparts abnormal microcolony cell and matrix distribution and strongly suppresses vegetation formation during endocarditis and kidney colonization following CAUTI (Fig. 2, ,3,3, and and6)6) (13). In the case of ahrC, Fig. 4 shows that ΩahrC biofilms lagged behind OG1RF in the accumulation of stainable biomass after only 6 h of development, which is consistent with the early biofilm attachment defect in the microtiter plate assay shown in Fig. 1. Expression of ahrC was highest in planktonic cells during exponential growth of OG1RF (Fig. 5). Likewise, in the endocarditis complementation experiments using the nisin-inducible plasmid, ahrC expression was likely at its maximum in the inoculum since nisin was not present following injection of the bacteria into the rabbits. Thus, the data we present here collectively suggest that ahrC is important in the early stages of E. faecalis biofilm formation and endocarditis development (Fig. 6). This contrasts with expression of the gene encoding the extracellular protease GelE (Fig. 5), which is controlled by the quorum-sensing fsr locus (47). GelE functions at later stages in endocarditis by contributing to immune evasion and vegetation embolization (57).

It is unclear at this point what the specific role of AhrC is in the virulence of E. faecalis biofilm infections and whether this role is directly related to its role in in vitro biofilm formation. In other Gram-positive species, ArgR and AhrC regulate gene expression in response to arginine (45, 58). The E. faecalis AhrC and ArgR proteins may have related functions in biofilm formation since transposon insertions in either gene resulted in the smallest amount of attachment among the strains tested in early biofilms (Fig. 1). In preliminary experiments (data not shown), the addition of arginine to growth medium did not rescue the biofilm-defective phenotypes of either transposon strain, so it remains undetermined whether these genes function in response to arginine, as is seen in other species. Based on their disparate phenotypes in endocarditis virulence, it is clear these two transcription factors have different regulons within the context of the host environment. Experiments to characterize the E. faecalis AhrC regulon are needed, as they will provide insight into the regulatory pathways that function downstream of AhrC in E. faecalis endocarditis and in vitro biofilm formation.

The complementation strain that constitutively expresses ahrC from the chromosome restored the transposon insertion-mediated biofilm defect (Fig. 1), but unexpectedly failed to complement the endocarditis defect (Fig. 2). While it is possible that integration of the p23ahrC construct into the chromosome between genes EF1117 and EF1116 disrupted a regulatory element or noncoding RNA that is specific for in vivo growth, the presence of an endogenous stem-loop transcriptional terminator upstream of the p23ahrC integration site renders this scenario unlikely (32). We hypothesize that regulated expression of ahrC is critical for its function in virulence and that gross overproduction of AhrC in the chromosomal knock-in strain (Fig. 5) disrupted the ability of E. faecalis to establish infection at the heart valve surface. This would be the case if AhrC caused repression of genes that mediate later stages of endocarditis. The reason why overproduction of AhrC did not affect biofilm formation may be due to limitations of the microtiter plate biofilm assay being unable to segregate the steps of biofilm formation beyond initial attachment and biomass generation. Alternatively, it is possible that high constitutive expression could result in promiscuous binding of the transcription factor to alternate promoters, resulting in incorrect expression of genes that affect infection-related functions irrelevant to in vitro biofilm formation. Further studies are needed to determine how ahrC expression is controlled. While our data (Fig. 5) confirm previously published results that the ahrC locus is not positively regulated by fsr (59), the possibility that transcription of ahrC is downregulated following fsr activation cannot be ruled out.

In conclusion, this study indicates that two of the biofilm determinants identified from transposon and RIVET genetic screens are virulence factors contributing to two distinct models of biofilm-mediated infection. The lack of a major role in endocarditis virulence for most of the biofilm genes tested here strongly suggests that the genetic requirements for in vitro biofilm formation and endocarditis do not significantly overlap. Both eep and ahrC are conserved in Staphylococcus aureus, thus making them attractive targets for the development of new vaccines or antimicrobial agents. Determination of the function of these enterococcal biofilm infection-associated virulence factors in biofilm formation and the establishment of disease is a source of ongoing study, as is testing the S. aureus homologs for functions in biofilm formation and infection. Overall, this research will improve our understanding of the mechanisms used by E. faecalis to colonize and form biofilms on surfaces inside a host.


We gratefully acknowledge Jillian Vocke and Joe Merriman for assistance with endocarditis experiments, Rachel Leibman for preliminary contributions to microscopy experiments, and Katie Ballering for constructing the AhrC expression plasmid.

This work was carried out in part using computing resources provided by the University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute.

This research was supported by award no. R01AI58134 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to G.M.D. and award no. P50DK64540 and R01DK51406 to S.J.H. A.M.T.B. received additional support from the NIH Medical Scientist Training Grant T32GM008244. K.L.F. received support from award no. F32AI082881 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and award no. 10POST3290026 from the American Heart Association. P.S.G. received support from the ASM Robert D. Watkins Graduate Research Fellowship Award.

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, or the American Society for Microbiology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Published ahead of print 4 March 2013


1. Parsek MR, Singh PK. 2003. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:677–701 [PubMed]
2. Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. 2009. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell. Microbiol. 11:1034–1043 [PubMed]
3. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. 2004. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:95–108 [PubMed]
4. del Pozo JL, Patel R. 2007. The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 82:204–209 [PubMed]
5. Coenye T, Nelis HJ. 2010. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J. Microbiol. Methods 83:89–105 [PubMed]
6. Kang J, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Brown VM, Weber DJ, Rutala WA. 2011. Relative frequency of health care-associated pathogens by infection site at a university hospital from 1980 to 2008. Am. J. Infect. Control 40:416–420 [PubMed]
7. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK. 2008. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 29:996–1011 [PubMed]
8. McDonald JR, Olaison L, Anderson DJ, Hoen B, Miro JM, Eykyn S, Abrutyn E, Fowler VG, Jr, Habib G, Selton-Suty C, Pappas PA, Cabell CH, Corey GR, Marco F, Sexton DJ. 2005. Enterococcal endocarditis: 107 cases from the international collaboration on endocarditis merged database. Am. J. Med. 118:759–766 [PubMed]
9. Fernandez Guerrero ML, Goyenechea A, Verdejo C, Roblas RF, de Gorgolas M. 2007. Enterococcal endocarditis on native and prosthetic valves: a review of clinical and prognostic factors with emphasis on hospital-acquired infections as a major determinant of outcome. Medicine 86:363–377 [PubMed]
10. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miro JM, Fowler VG, Jr, Bayer AS, Karchmer AW, Olaison L, Pappas PA, Moreillon P, Chambers ST, Chu VH, Falco V, Holland DJ, Jones P, Klein JL, Raymond NJ, Read KM, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Wang A, Woods CW, Cabell CH. 2009. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st Century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 169:463–473 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Paganelli FL, Willems RJ, Leavis HL. 2012. Optimizing future treatment of enterococcal infections: attacking the biofilm? Trends Microbiol. 20:40–49 [PubMed]
12. Guiton PS, Hung CS, Hancock LE, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2010. Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections. Infect. Immun. 78:4166–4175 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Frank KL, Barnes AM, Grindle SM, Manias DA, Schlievert PM, Dunny GM. 2012. Use of recombinase-based in vivo expression technology to characterize Enterococcus faecalis gene expression during infection identifies in vivo-expressed antisense RNAs and implicates the protease Eep in pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 80:539–549 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Zhao M, Murray BE. 2011. Relative contributions of Ebp pili and the collagen adhesin Ace to host extracellular matrix protein adherence and experimental urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect. Immun. 79:2901–2910 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, Murray BE. 2010. Importance of the collagen adhesin Ace in pathogenesis and protection against Enterococcus faecalis experimental endocarditis. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1000716 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000716 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2007. Importance of the ebp (endocarditis- and biofilm-associated pilus) locus in the pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis ascending urinary tract infection. J. Infect. Dis. 195:1671–1677 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Bourgogne A, Garsin DA, Qin X, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Yerrapragada S, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha S, Buhay C, Shen H, Chen G, Williams G, Muzny D, Maadani A, Fox KA, Gioia J, Chen L, Shang Y, Arias CA, Nallapareddy SR, Zhao M, Prakash VP, Chowdhury S, Jiang H, Gibbs RA, Murray BE, Highlander SK, Weinstock GM. 2008. Large scale variation in Enterococcus faecalis illustrated by the genome analysis of strain OG1RF. Genome Biol. 9:R110 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r110 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GS, Nelson KE, Seshadri R, Read TD, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, Tettelin H, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Daugherty S, DeBoy RT, Durkin S, Kolonay J, Madupu R, Nelson W, Vamathevan J, Tran B, Upton J, Hansen T, Shetty J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Radune D, Ketchum KA, Dougherty BA, Fraser CM. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299:2071–2074 [PubMed]
19. Palmer KL, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Kos VN, Zucker J, Desjardins C, Cerqueira G, Gevers D, Walker S, Wortman J, Feldgarden M, Haas B, Birren B, Gilmore MS. 2012. Comparative genomics of enterococci: variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. mBio 3:e00318–11 doi:10.1128/mBio.00318-11 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kristich CJ, Nguyen VT, Le T, Barnes AM, Grindle S, Dunny GM. 2008. Development and use of an efficient system for random mariner transposon mutagenesis to identify novel genetic determinants of biofilm formation in the core Enterococcus faecalis genome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:3377–3386 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Kemp KD, Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. 2007. Relative contributions of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF sortase-encoding genes, srtA and bps (srtC), to biofilm formation and a murine model of urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 75:5399–5404 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Garsin DA, Hook M, Erlandsen SL, Murray BE. 2006. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. J. Clin. Invest. 116:2799–2807 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Guiton PS, Hung CS, Kline KA, Roth R, Kau AL, Hayes E, Heuser J, Dodson KW, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. 2009. Contribution of autolysin and sortase A during Enterococcus faecalis DNA-dependent biofilm development. Infect. Immun. 77:3626–3638 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Qin X, Singh KV, Xu Y, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 1998. Effect of disruption of a gene encoding an autolysin of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2883–2888 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Ballering KS, Kristich CJ, Grindle SM, Oromendia A, Beattie DT, Dunny GM. 2009. Functional genomics of Enterococcus faecalis: multiple novel genetic determinants for biofilm formation in the core genome. J. Bacteriol. 191:2806–2814 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Di Rosa R, Creti R, Venditti M, D'Amelio R, Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Baldassarri L. 2006. Relationship between biofilm formation, the enterococcal surface protein (Esp) and gelatinase in clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 256:145–150 [PubMed]
27. Mohamed JA, Huang W, Nallapareddy SR, Teng F, Murray BE. 2004. Influence of origin of isolates, especially endocarditis isolates, and various genes on biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect. Immun. 72:3658–3663 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Roggiani M, Schlievert PM. 2000. Purification of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A, p 59–66 In Evans TJ, editor. (ed), Septic shock methods and protocols, vol 36 Humana Press, Totowa, NJ [PubMed]
29. Dunny GM, Clewell DB. 1975. Transmissible toxin (hemolysin) plasmid in Streptococcus faecalis and its mobilization of a noninfectious drug resistance plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 124:784–790 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kristich CJ, Chandler JR, Dunny GM. 2007. Development of a host-genotype-independent counterselectable marker and a high-frequency conjugative delivery system and their use in genetic analysis of Enterococcus faecalis. Plasmid 57:131–144 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Vesic D, Kristich CJ. 15 February 2013. A Rex-family transcriptional repressor influences H2O2 accumulation by Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. [Epub ahead of print.] doi:10.1128/JB.02135-12 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Le Breton Y, Muller C, Auffray Y, Rince A. 2007. New insights into the Enterococcus faecalis CroRS two-component system obtained using a differential-display random arbitrarily primed PCR approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:3738–3741 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. van der Vossen JM, van der Lelie D, Venema G. 1987. Isolation and characterization of Streptococcus cremoris Wg2-specific promoters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2452–2457 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Chuang ON, Schlievert PM, Wells CL, Manias DA, Tripp TJ, Dunny GM. 2009. Multiple functional domains of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance Asc10 contribute to endocarditis virulence. Infect. Immun. 77:539–548 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Kristich CJ, Li YH, Cvitkovitch DG, Dunny GM. 2004. Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 186:154–163 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395–2407 [PubMed]
37. Vorregaard M. 2008. COMSTAT2—a modern 3D image analysis environment for biofilms. Master's thesis Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kogens Lyngby, Denmark
38. Eleaume H, Jabbouri S. 2004. Comparison of two standardisation methods in real-time quantitative RT-PCR to follow Staphylococcus aureus genes expression during in vitro growth. J. Microbiol. Methods 59:363–370 [PubMed]
39. Ballering KS. 2010. Identification and characterization of novel genetic determinants of biofilm formation in Enterococcus faecalis. Ph.D. thesis University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
40. Bae T, Clerc-Bardin S, Dunny GM. 2000. Analysis of expression of prgX, a key negative regulator of the transfer of the Enterococcus faecalis pheromone-inducible plasmid pCF10. J. Mol. Biol. 297:861–875 [PubMed]
41. Thomas VC, Hiromasa Y, Harms N, Thurlow L, Tomich J, Hancock LE. 2009. A fratricidal mechanism is responsible for eDNA release and contributes to biofilm development of Enterococcus faecalis. Mol. Microbiol. 72:1022–1036 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Ishikawa S, Kawai Y, Hiramatsu K, Kuwano M, Ogasawara N. 2006. A new FtsZ-interacting protein, YlmF, complements the activity of FtsA during progression of cell division in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 60:1364–1380 [PubMed]
43. Hamoen LW, Meile JC, de Jong W, Noirot P, Errington J. 2006. SepF, a novel FtsZ-interacting protein required for a late step in cell division. Mol. Microbiol. 59:989–999 [PubMed]
44. Larsen R, Buist G, Kuipers OP, Kok J. 2004. ArgR and AhrC are both required for regulation of arginine metabolism in Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 186:1147–1157 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Kloosterman TG, Kuipers OP. 2011. Regulation of arginine acquisition and virulence gene expression in the human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae by transcription regulators ArgR1 and AhrC. J. Biol. Chem. 286:44594–44605 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Barcelona-Andres B, Marina A, Rubio V. 2002. Gene structure, organization, expression, and potential regulatory mechanisms of arginine catabolism in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 184:6289–6300 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. 2001. Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J. Bacteriol. 183:3372–3382 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. 2002. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:167–193 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Baldassarri L, Creti R, Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Venditti M, Di Rosa R. 2004. Analysis of virulence factors in cases of enterococcal endocarditis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 10:1006–1008 [PubMed]
50. Konto-Ghiorghi Y, Mairey E, Mallet A, Dumenil G, Caliot E, Trieu-Cuot P, Dramsi S. 2009. Dual role for pilus in adherence to epithelial cells and biofilm formation in Streptococcus agalactiae. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000422 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000422 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Chen SM, Tsai YS, Wu CM, Liao SK, Wu LC, Chang CS, Liu YH, Tsai PJ. 2010. Streptococcal collagen-like surface protein 1 promotes adhesion to the respiratory epithelial cell. BMC Microbiol. 10:320 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-320 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Chuang-Smith ON, Wells CL, Henry-Stanley MJ, Dunny GM. 2010. Acceleration of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation by aggregation substance expression in an ex vivo model of cardiac valve colonization. PLoS One 5:e15798 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015798 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Schlievert PM, Gahr PJ, Assimacopoulos AP, Dinges MM, Stoehr JA, Harmala JW, Hirt H, Dunny GM. 1998. Aggregation and binding substances enhance pathogenicity in rabbit models of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 66:218–223 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Trotter KM, Dunny GM. 1990. Mutants of Enterococcus faecalis deficient as recipients in mating with donors carrying pheromone-inducible plasmids. Plasmid 24:57–67 [PubMed]
55. Bensing BA, Dunny GM. 1993. Cloning and molecular analysis of genes affecting expression of binding substance, the recipient-encoded receptor(s) mediating mating aggregate formation in Enterococcus faecalis. J. Bacteriol. 175:7421–7429 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Barnes AM. 2012. Ultrastructural characterization of matrix development and the role of extracellular DNA in early Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Ph.D. thesis The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
57. Thurlow LR, Thomas VC, Narayanan S, Olson S, Fleming SD, Hancock LE. 2010. Gelatinase contributes to the pathogenesis of endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect. Immun. 78:4936–4943 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Larsen R, van Hijum SA, Martinussen J, Kuipers OP, Kok J. 2008. Transcriptome analysis of the Lactococcus lactis ArgR and AhrC regulons. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4768–4771 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Bourgogne A, Hilsenbeck SG, Dunny GM, Murray BE. 2006. Comparison of OG1RF and an isogenic fsrB deletion mutant by transcriptional analysis: the Fsr system of Enterococcus faecalis is more than the activator of gelatinase and serine protease. J. Bacteriol. 188:2875–2884 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB. 1978. Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75:3479–3483 [PubMed]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)