Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ploscurrentsLink to Publisher's site
PLoS Curr. 2013 April 16; 5: ecurrents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a.
PMCID: PMC3644291

The Human Impact of Floods: a Historical Review of Events 1980-2009 and Systematic Literature Review


Background. Floods are the most common natural disaster and the leading cause of natural disaster fatalities worldwide. Risk of catastrophic losses due to flooding is significant given deforestation and the increasing proximity of large populations to coastal areas, river basins and lakeshores. The objectives of this review were to describe the impact of flood events on human populations in terms of mortality, injury, and displacement and, to the extent possible, identify risk factors associated with these outcomes. This is one of five reviews on the human impact of natural disasters Methods. Data on the impact of floods were compiled using two methods, a historical review of flood events from 1980 to 2009 from multiple databases and a systematic literature review of publications ending in October 2012. Analysis included descriptive statistics, bivariate tests for associations and multinomial logistic regression of flood characteristics and mortality using Stata 11.0. Findings. There were 539,811 deaths (range: 510,941 to 568,680), 361,974 injuries and 2,821,895,005 people affected by floods between 1980 and 2009. Inconsistent reporting suggests this is an underestimate, particularly in terms of the injured and affected populations. The primary cause of flood-related mortality is drowning; in developed countries being in a motor-vehicle and male gender are associated with increased mortality, whereas female gender may be linked to higher mortality in low-income countries. Conclusions. Expanded monitoring of floods, improved mitigation measures, and effective communication with civil authorities and vulnerable populations has the potential to reduce loss of life in future flood events.


Floods are the leading cause of natural disaster deaths worldwide and were responsible for 6.8 million deaths in the 20th century. Asia is the most flood-affected region, accounting for nearly 50% of flood-related fatalities in the last quarter of the 20th century 1,2,3 . The Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) defines a flood as “a significant rise of water level in a stream, lake, reservoir or coastal region” 4. More colloquially, flooding is the “presence of water in areas that are usually dry” 1. The events and factors that precipitate flood events are diverse, multifaceted, and interrelated. Weather factors include heavy or sustained precipitation, snowmelts, or storm surges from cyclones whereas important human factors include structural failures of dams and levies, alteration of absorptive land cover with impervious surfaces and inadequate drainage systems. Geographic regions such as coastal areas, river basins and lakeshores are particularly at risk from storms or cyclones that generate high winds and storm surge 5. Environmental/physical land features including soil type, the presence of vegetation, and other drainage basin characteristics also influence flood outcomes 6. Floods transpire on varying timelines, ranging from flash floods with little warning to those that evolve over days or weeks (riverine). Flash floods, characterized by high-velocity flows and short warning times have the highest average mortality rates per event and are responsible for the majority of flood deaths in developed countries 1,3,7. In contrast, riverine floods which are caused by gradual accumulation of heavy rainfall are less likely to cause mortality because of sufficient time for warning and evacuation. Occasionally floods are associated with secondary hazards such as mudslides in mountainous areas.

Recent accelerations in population growth and changes in land use patterns have increased human vulnerability to floods. Harmful impacts of floods include direct mortality and morbidity and indirect displacement and widespread damage of crops, infrastructure and property. Immediate causes of death in floods include drowning and trauma or injury 1,8. Over an extended time period, there may also be increased mortality due to infectious disease 1,9,10,11 . The risks posed by future flood events are significant given population growth, proximities of populations to coastlines, expanded development of coastal areas and flood plains, environmental degradation and climate change 12. The objectives of this review were to describe the impact of floods on the human population, in terms of mortality, injury, and displacement and to identify risk factors associated with these outcomes. This is one of five reviews on the human impact of natural disasters, the others being volcanoes, cyclones, tsunamis, and earthquakes.


Data on the impact of flood events were compiled using two methods, a historical review of flood events and a systematic literature review for publications relating to the human impacts of flooding with a focus on mortality, injury, and displacement.

Historical Event Review

A historical database of significant floods occurring from 1980 to 2009 was created from publicly available data. Multiple data sources were sought to ensure a complete listing of events, to allow for both human and geophysical factors to be included, and to facilitate cross checking of information between sources. The two primary data sources were CRED International Disaster Database (EM-DAT) 4 and the Dartmouth Flood Observatory (DFO) Global Archive of Large Flood Events database 13. For inclusion in the EM-DAT database, one or more of the following criteria must be fulfilled: 10 or more people killed or injured; 100 people affected; declaration of a state of emergency; or a call for international assistance. The DFO database provides a comprehensive list of flood events recorded by news, governmental, instrumental, and remote sensing sources from 1985 to 2009. Inclusion criteria are: significant damage to structures or agriculture, long intervals since the last similar event, or fatalities. Flooding specifically related to hurricane storm surge and tsunamis were excluded.

Event lists from both databases were downloaded in July 2007 and merged to create a single database; the database was updated in August 2009. The EM-DAT and DFO databases included 2,678 and 2,910 events, reported, respectively, between 1980 and 2009. Both EM-DAT and DFO reported the date and location of the event, the affected region and the number dead. In addition, the number affected, homeless, and total affected (sum of injured, homeless, and affected) were reported by EM-DAT. DFO also reported the number displaced, duration of the event (days), and ‘flood magnitude.’ Flood magnitude is a composite score of flood severity developed by DFO that encompasses damage level, recurrence interval, duration of the flood in days and the area affected 13. For flood impacts reported by EM-DAT, zeroes were treated as missing values because they were used as placeholders and their inclusion in the analysis could contribute to the under estimation of tsunami impacts. The final list included 2,678 events reported by EM-DAT and 2,910 reported by DFO; 1,496 events were reported by both sources yielding a total of 4,093 flood events affecting human populations. See for the database of flood events.

To assess risk factors for flood-related mortality the following categories were used: no deaths (0 deaths), low (1-9 deaths), medium (10- 49 deaths) and high (≥50 deaths). Bivariate tests for associations between flood mortality and the following characteristics were performed using χ2 (categorical measures) and ANOVA (continuous measures): decade, region (defined by the World Health Organization (WHO)), income level (World Bank), gross domestic product (GDP), GINI (measure of income inequality), and flood magnitude. All covariates, with the exception of GINI, which was not strongly associated with flood mortality in adjusted analyses, and GDP, which was highly correlated with per capita World Bank income level, were included in the final multinomial logistic regression model to assess the relative risk of mortality at a given level as compared to events with no deaths. All analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software, Version 11.0 14.

Systematic Literature Review

Key word searches in MEDLINE (Ovid Technologies, humans), EMBASE (Elsevier, B.V., humans), SCOPUS (Elsevier B.V., humans), and Web of Knowledge, Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) were performed to identify articles published in July 2007 or earlier that described natural hazards and their impact on human populations. One search was done for all the five natural hazards described in this set of papers. This paper describes the results for cyclones. The systematic review is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Key words used to search for natural hazards includednatural hazard(s), natural disaster(s), volcano(s), volcanic, volcanic eruption, seismic event, earthquake(s), cyclone(s), typhoon(s), hurricane(s), tropical storm(s), flood(s), flooding, mudslide(s), tsunami(s), and tidal wave(s). Key words included for impact on human populations were affected, damage(d), injury, injuries, injured, displaced, displacement, refugees, homeless, wounded, wound(s), death(s), mortality, casualty, casualties, killed, died, fatality, fatalities and had to be used in either the title, abstract or as a subject heading/key word. The search resulted in 2,747 articles from MEDLINE, 3,763 articles from EMBASE, 5,219 articles from SCOPUS, and 2,285 articles from ISI Web of Knowledge. Results from the four databases were combined and duplicates were excluded to yield a total of 9,958 articles.

A multi-stage screening process was used. First, title screening was performed to identify articles that were unrelated to natural disasters or human populations. Each title was screened by two independent reviewers and was retained if either or both reviewers established that inclusion criteria were met. To ensure consistent interpretation of inclusion criteria, percent agreement was assessed across reviewers for a small sample of articles, and title screening began after 80% agreement on inclusion was achieved. A total of 4,873 articles were retained for abstract review. Articles that met one or more of the following criteria were excluded in the abstract screening: language other than English; editorial or opinion letter without research-based findings; related to environmental vulnerability or hazard impact but not human populations; individual case report/study; focus on impact/perceptions of responders; and not related to human or environmental vulnerabilities or impacts of hazards. As with the title screening, 80% overall agreement between reviewers was needed before abstract screening started. Each abstract was screened by two independent reviewers and was retained if either or both established that inclusion criteria were met. Included abstracts were coded for event type, timeframe, region, subject of focus, and vulnerable population focus. A total of 3,687 articles were retained for full article review. Articles discussing the impacts of natural disasters on human populations in terms of mortality, injury, and displacement were prioritized for review. A total of 119 articles on flood events meeting the criteria were retained for full review. Upon full review, 27 articles were retained including 17 that underwent standard data abstraction and 11 that were identified as review articles (Figure 1).

Following the systematic review, a search was conducted to identify relevant articles published after the initial search up to October 2012. This search identified seven additional articles, including three articles with primary data that underwent full review and four review articles. Summaries of abstracted (n=21) and review articles (n=15) are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1: Articles included in the flood systematic literature review relating to mortality and injury* (abstracted, N=21)**
* Displacement is excluded from the table because no primary data on displacement was collected in only one study, Schnitzler, 2007. ** Additional articles included from the hand searches are Schniztler 2007, Jonkman 2009, Biswas 2010 and Bich 2011.


Historical Event Review

Overall, an average of 131 (range 35-287) floods affected human populations annually with the majority (81%) occurred during or after the 1990s. Part of this increase can be explained by improved reporting and by the DFO reporting beginning in 1985. There was great variation in the number of events reported annually between EM-DAT (range 35-213) and DFO (42-235) (Figure 2). While the frequency of flood events increased gradually over time, their impacts on human populations in terms of mortality and affected populations varied greatly between years and were often concentrated around large-scale events (Figure 3). Using the WHO regions the Americas (AMRO) and Western Pacific (WPRO) regions experienced the most flooding events while the fewest were reported in Europe (EURO) (Figure 4). Deaths were overwhelmingly concentrated in South East Asia (SEARO), which accounted for 69% of global flood mortality, though both the Americas (AMRO) and Western Pacific (WPRO) had significant minorities of flood fatalities. The great majority of the flood affected population was in WPRO (59%) and SEARO (35%) of the global total. Overall, the human impacts of floods in Europe, Africa, and the Eastern Mediterranean regions were limited; together the regions accounted for no more than 8% of flood deaths and 4% flood affected populations, respectively. The overall impact of flooding on human populations is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary measures for the impact of floods on human populations, 1980-2009 (N=4,093)*
*Figures are based on the highest reported number of deaths or injuries in an event. Deaths were reported in 4,093 events. Homeless, injured, and total affected populations are reported only by EM-DAT, thus ranges are not presented for overall impact ...

Affected Population. An estimated 2.8 billion people were reported to be affected by flood events between 1980 and 2009, including nearly 4.6 million rendered homeless. However, these figures likely substantially underestimate the true impact of floods on human populations because estimates of the total affected population and the homeless population were reported in only 64.3% (n=2,632) and 14.9% (n=611) of events, respectively. The distribution of the number affected was highly skewed with mean and median affected populations of 1,071,829 and 6,000 per event, respectively, which indicates that the median affected population may better reflect the impact of a typical flood event.

Mortality and Injury. When mortality data from the two sources were combined, deaths were reported in 96.8% (n=3,960) of floods since 1980. This figure excludes 13.9% of floods where no information on mortality was reported; if no deaths are presumed and these events are included, deaths occurred in 65.3% (n=2,673) of floods. 539,811 deaths (range: 510,941-568,680) resulting from flood events were reported. For floods where mortality was reported, there was a median of 9 (mean=135; range 0-138,000) deaths per event when using the highest reported death toll. Mortality exceeded 10,000 in only 4 events and 100,000 in two. The two deadliest events occurred in Bangladesh (138,000 deaths in 1991) and Myanmar (100,000 deaths in 2008). Injuries were reported in 401 (9.8%) events, where a total of 361,974 injuries were documented. In events where injuries were reported, there was a median of 12.5 (mean=904: range 1-249,378) per flood event. To estimate the total number of injuries due to flood events, it was presumed that injuries would occur in events where deaths were reported. There were 2,673 floods with fatalities but only 401 (9.8%) with injuries reported. When the median and mean for injuries were applied to the remaining 3,077 events, it was estimated that between 38,463 and 2,717,681 additional unreported flood related injuries may have occurred between 1980 and 2009.

Bivariate associations between country-level characteristics and flood-related mortality from 1980 through 2009 are presented in Table 4. Findings suggests that the proportion of events with high mortality (>50 deaths) have decreased over time. Income level was also significantly associated with flood mortality, where for both low and lower-middle income countries, a greater proportion of events fell in the medium and high death categories as compared to higher income countries. Higher mortality events were concentrated in the South East Asian and Western Pacific regions.

Table 4: Flood event mortality characteristics, 1980-2009 (N = 4,093)
*GINI coefficient scores for income distribution range from 0 to 100 with 0 representing a perfect equality and 100 perfect inequality.59

Findings from the adjusted analyses (Table 5) modeling the relative risk of flood related mortality show that all predictors were significantly associated with flood mortality. The relative risk of medium- and high-level mortality events compared to events with no deaths significantly decreased over time. There was also a significant decreased relative risk of mortality in excess of 50 deaths for events in higher income countries compared with lower income country events. Additionally, as magnitude of a flood increased, so did the risk of having high mortality when adjusting for all other predictors. A flood rated as high magnitude as compared to one with low magnitude was associated with an increased relative risk of having high mortality as compared to no mortality (RR=13.20, 95% CI 8.25, 22.11). Caution should be taken when interpreting such findings, however, as magnitude estimates were missing for a large proportion of events, and missing magnitude was associated with the outcome in this study. Regional differences in reported mortality were also supported by the analysis. Higher mortality events were concentrated in the South East Asian and Western Pacific regions, compared to events occurring in the Americas (Southeast Asia RR=3.35, 95 CI: 2.21, 5.72; Western Pacific RR=2.38, 95 CI: 1.62, 3.34).

Table 5: Multinomial logistic regression results for mortality in flood events, 1980-2009 (N =4,093)*
* Reference is “no deaths” for all categories (n=743) **see Table 4 notes for definition of flood magnitude

Systematic Literature Review

Mortality. Fourteen of the reviewed articles reported mortality data including ten that provided information on direct or indirect causes of mortality and/or risk factors for flood-related deaths (Table 6) 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 . Most articles provided some information about the distribution of deaths across population subgroups (i.e. gender, age) and/or an individual’s location at the time of the event; seven of these ten articles reported on floods in the United States. Nearly all articles reporting cause of death cited drowning as the most frequent cause of death 1,15,18,19,20,22,29 . Cumulatively, drowning accounted for 75% of deaths; other causes of death included falls, electrocution, heart attack, hypothermia, trauma, snake bites, and carbon monoxide poisoning.

Table 6: Primary research articles describing flood related deaths and risk factors for flood mortality (N=10)
*excludes 1150 deaths from diarrhea and other possibly deaths reported during the 4 month period surrounding the event

All studies in the United States examined mortality related to motor vehicles and found an increased risk of mortality among individuals in motor vehicles during the event, of all deaths 74% were motor vehicle related 17,18,19,20 . This compares to a motor vehicle related death rate of 63% in a recent review of US flood fatalities between 1959 and 2005 7. Higher proportions of deaths among males (64%) were consistently observed in the United States, except for Puerto Rico where 57% (13/23) of flood related fatalities were female and hurricane Katrina where deaths evenly divided between the sexes (51% male, 49% female) 16,18,19,20,28 . In contrast, the one article describing flood mortality in the less developed country of Nepal found that females of all age groups faced increased mortality risk and 58% of all deaths were women 23 Other factors found to be associated with flood-related mortality included storm course/time storm hit landfall 19,22 summer months 17,30, low socioeconomic status 23, poor housing construction ,23,24,31 and timing of warning messages 19,22.

Injury and Displacement. Injury or morbidity data were reported in ten of the 18 included articles, of which nine provided information on injury type and/or risk factors 15,16,24,32,33,34,35,36,54 . The majority of flood-related injuries are minor. The two studies that captured a large number of injuries, both in the United States, found that musculoskeletal injuries were most common (46% and 34%), followed by lacerations (21% and 24%). Other flood-related injuries included abrasions and contusions, motor vehicle related injuries, and falls 33,34,54. In less developed settings, increased incidence of snake bites and fires were also cited as causes of injury or death 2,36. Among care seekers in flood-affected areas of Bangladesh 5.1% of wounds were infected. Another review suggested that the proportion of survivors requiring medical attention is less than 2% 2. A distribution of injuries across population subgroups was reported by only one study in India which found that injuries were more common in males (67% vs. 33%), that the 11-40 year age group comprised 68% of the injured, and that those age 50 and above accounted for 18% of flood deaths 34. Seven articles reported displacement or evacuation figures however none described risk factors associated with flood-related displacement 15,17,21,24,25,35,37 .


Main findings

In the past 30 years approximately 2.8 billion people have been affected by floods with 4.5 million left homeless, at approximately 540,000 deaths and 360,000 injuries, excluding an estimated 38,000 to 2.7 million injuries that went unrecorded. While the mortality estimate presented in this study is consistent with the range of estimates presented in other studies 1,38, approximations of numbers injured and displaced are likely gross underestimates of the true values given the infrequency with which figures are reported. Floods events with high levels of mortality are relatively rare: despite their increasing frequency, there were only four events with >10,000 deaths and 58 events with >1000 deaths between 1977 and 2009. A slight decrease in the average number of fatalities per event was observed which is in keeping with broader natural disaster trends that show an increase in the size of the affected population and a decrease in the average number of deaths per event 4. Higher numbers of fatalities were reported in flash floods than river floods, however, river floods affected larger populations and land areas 3,7. Lower mortality rates in river floods can mostly be attributed to their slower onset allowing for longer time for warning and evacuation 3,39. The widespread use of effective early warning methods for hydrological events has likely contributed declining flood mortality.

Findings from the historical event review are consistent with previous observations that flood mortality varies by region, economic development level, and the severity of the event 12,40. The majority of flood-related deaths are concentrated in less developed and heavily populated countries, with Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific region experiencing the highest risk of flood-related deaths. Flood mortality rates are relatively similar across continents, but Asian floods kill and affect more people because they affect substantially larger areas with larger populations 3. At the country level, lower GDP per capita was linked to higher mortality, which is in keeping with the established relationship between poverty and increased disaster risk 41. Human and social vulnerabilities and inequalities, urbanization, population density, terrain and geo-physical characteristics and variation in the frequency and precipitating causes of floods by region are also factors that contribute flood risk levels 3,6,12,42 . Temporal changes and development trends have also contributed to changing influences of some of these factors over time 42. Economic development increases the risk of disaster-related economic losses however improved emergency preparedness, response, and coping capacity may reduce disaster vulnerability 3. That countries with greater resources are able to better predict and respond to impending flood events suggests that building systems and capacity to detect and respond to floods in less developed countries should be a priority 40.

Causes of and risks for flood-related mortality and injury identified in the systematic literature review are consistent with previous reviews on the human impact of flooding 1,29,43,44 . In comparison, a recent review of 13 flood events in Europe and the United States found that 68% of deaths were due to drowning, 12% trauma, 6% heart attack, 4% fire, 3% electrocution, 1% carbon monoxide poisoning, and 7% other/unknown 1. Studies reporting the gender breakdown for flood-related deaths, most of which are accounts of flood events in the United States, consistently show a greater proportion of males as compared with female deaths. These observations are aligned with previous studies, including a review of flood events in Europe and the US which estimated that males account for 70% of flood related deaths 1,44,45,46 . While limited to only a few countries, these findings suggest there may be increased mortality risk for males in more developed settings and for females in less developed countries 23,47 . An increased risk of death in younger and older populations was also observed which is consistent with broader natural disaster mortality trends 7,45,46,48,49 . In Nepal, children had the highest crude mortality rates of all age groups and were nearly twice as likely to die in the flood as their same-sex parent 23. However, recent reviews of age-specific risk for flood mortality have been inconclusive because attempts to aggregate data were hampered by high proportions of deaths where age is unreported 1. While the prevailing notion is that women and children are more vulnerable in disasters 50, there is a paucity of research in less developed countries where the majority of flood deaths occur. Future research on the human impacts of floods should focus on these less developed settings, most notably Asia where flood deaths are concentrated, with the aim of identifying the most at-risk and vulnerable population sub-groups to better target early warning and preparedness efforts.

The ecological nature of the study of event characteristics did not allow for an examination of specific factors within a country or region that may be associated with increased mortality following a flood event. Population density in coastal regions, which are particularly vulnerable to flooding, is twice of the world’s average population density and many of the world’s coasts are becoming increasingly urbanized 51. Currently, 50.6% of the world’s population lives in urban settings; by 2050 this figure is projected to increase to 70% with the majority of urbanization occurring in less developed regions of Asia and Africa 52. Unabated urbanization and land use changes, high concentrations of poor and marginalized populations, and a lack of regulations and preparedness efforts are factors that will likely contribute to an increasing impact of floods in the future 38. From the natural hazard perspective, climate change is also likely to contribute to future increases in flooding. Increased frequency of intense rainfall, as a result of higher temperatures and intensified convection will likely lead to a rise in extreme rainfall events, more flash floods and urban flooding due to excessive storm water. Additionally, sea level rise and increasing storm frequency will lead to additional storm surges in coastal areas while seasonal changes, notably warmer winters, will contribute more broadly to increased precipitation and flood risk 38. Together, changes in socioeconomic, demographic, physical terrain features and climatologic factors suggests that floods will become more frequent and have greater effects on human populations in the coming decades.

Given that flood losses are likely to increase in future years, increased attention to flood prevention and mitigation strategies is necessary. To date, early warning systems have been an effective mechanism for reducing the impact of floods 38, however, they are not ubiquitous and should be prioritized in less developed countries with large at-risk populations and high frequencies of flooding. It is important that messaging and targeted communication strategies accompany early warnings so that the population understands the impending risk and can respond appropriately. Many flood fatalities are associated with risk-taking behaviors, thus messages to avoid entering flood waters and to curtail risky activities in all stages of the event may be successful in reducing flood fatalities 1. Additional, improved land use planning and regulation of development can mitigate flood impacts. Studies on the relationships between flood losses, natural hazard characteristics, and societal and demographic vulnerability factors can aid in informing and prioritizing flood prevention and mitigation strategies. Finally, comparisons of the effectiveness of different policies and mitigation strategies can inform future strategy and policy actions and ensure they are appropriate in specific contexts.


The effects of flood events are the subject of gross approximations and aggregations that have a great deal of imprecision. The availability and quality of data has likely increased and improved over time and the use multiple data sources increased reporting. However, in many events deaths are unknown or unrecorded; for other outcomes such as injured and affected, reporting frequency is even lower which likely contributes to a substantial underestimation of the impacts of flood events on human populations. While available data is sufficient for a cursory analysis of global flood impacts and trends, improved reporting of flood outcomes, including the development of national systems capable of more accurately reporting mortality and injury would be beneficial. Regarding the measures used in this study, our multivariable model included a broad classification of income level according to the World Bank, as opposed to GDP. While we believe GDP to be a more precise measure of wealth, it was nonetheless excluded in the analysis because we did not obtain GDP estimates that were time specific to each event. Inconsistencies and errors were common in data files from different sources, and in some cases inclusion criteria were not ideal for the purposes of this review, which created a challenge in reconciling event lists. For example, the 2004 Asian tsunami was classified as a flood by Dartmouth but not by EM-DAT; this event was ultimately removed from the data set, however, it represented the highest mortality event in the study period, which has potentially important implications for analysis. Consistent definitions and categorization of events across sources such as that initiated by EM-DAT in 2007 would be useful for streamlining future analysis and comparing the impacts of different types of flood events. Other principal limitations of the literature review are 1) that an in-depth quality analysis of all reviewed articles was not undertaken, and 2) the fact that only English language publications were included which likely contributed to incomplete coverage of studies published in other languages originating from low and middle income countries.


Interpretation of flood fatality data is challenging given the occurrence of occasional extreme events, temporal trends and the completeness and accuracy of available data. The continuing evolution of socio-demographic factors such as population growth, urbanization, land use change, and disaster warning systems and response capacities also influences trends. Between 1980 and 2009 there were an estimated 539,811 deaths (range 510,941 -568,584) and 361,974 injuries attributed to floods; a total of nearly 2.8 billion people were affected by floods during this timeframe. The primary cause of flood-related mortality was drowning. In developed countries being in a motor-vehicle at the time of a flood event and male gender were associated with increased mortality risk. Female gender may be linked to higher mortality risk in low-income countries. Both older and younger population sub-groups also face an increased mortality risk. The impact of floods on humans in terms of mortality, injury, and affected populations, presented here is a minimum estimate because information for many flood events is either unknown or unreported.

Data from the past quarter of a century suggest that floods have exacted a significant toll on the human population when compared to other natural disasters, particularly in terms of the size of affected populations. However, human vulnerability to floods is increasing, in large part due to population growth, urbanization, land use change, and climatological factors associated with an increase in extreme rainfall events. In the future, the frequency and impact of floods on human populations can be expected to increase. Additional attention to preparedness and mitigation strategies, particularly in less developed countries, where the majority of floods occur, and in Asia, a region disproportionately affected by floods, can lessen the impact of future flood events.

Competing Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Shannon Doocy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Suite E8132, Baltimore, MD 21230. Tel: 410-502-2628. Fax: 410-614-1419. Email:


We are grateful to Sarah Bernot, Dennis Brophy, Georgina Calderon, Erica Chapin, Joy Crook, Anna Dick, Shayna Dooling, Anjali Dotson, Charlotte Dolenz, Rachel Favero, Annie Fehrenbacher, Janka Flaska, Homaira Hanif, Sarah Henley-Shepard, Marissa Hildebrandt, Esther Johnston, Gifty Kwakye, Lindsay Mathieson, Siri Michel, Karen Milch, Sarah Murray, Catherine Packer, Evan Russell, Elena Semenova, Fatima Sharif, and Michelle Vanstone for their involvement in the systematic literature review and historical event review compilation. We would also like to thank John McGready for biostatistical support, Claire Twose assistance in designing and implementing the systematic literature review, and Hannah Tappis and Bhakti Hansoti for their support in the revision process.



Affiliation: Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


Associate Professor Department of Emergency Medicine Department of International Health The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health

Appendix 1

PRISMA Checklist

Download PDF

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Human and Social Dynamics Program (grant #0624106). The funding body played no role in the design, writing or decision to publish this manuscript.

Contributor Information

Shannon Doocy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Amy Daniels, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Sarah Murray, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Thomas D. Kirsch, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.


1. Jonkman SN & Kelman I. An analysis of the causes and circumstances of flood disaster deaths. Disasters. 2005; 29(1):75-97. [PubMed]
2. Noji E. Public Health Issues in Disasters. Critical Care Medicine. 2000; 33(1):S29-S33. [PubMed]
3. Jonkman, SN. Global perspectives on loss of human life caused by floods. Natural Hazards. 2005; 34(2): 151-175.
4. EM-DAT the International Disaster Database. (2009). Retrieved Jan 12, 2009, from
5. Hunt, JC. Inland and coastal flooding: Developments in prediction and prevention. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences. 2005; 363(1831): 1475-1491. [PubMed]
6. Tobin GA and Montz, BE (Eds.). Natural hazards: Explanations and integration. New York: Guilford Press, 1997.
7. Ashley ST and Ashley WA . Flood Fatalities in the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 2008; 47:805-818.
8. Beinin L. Medical Consequences of Natural Disasters. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1985.
9. Alajo SO, Nakavuma J, Erume J. Cholera in endemic districts of Uganda during El Nino rains: 2002-2003. African Health Sciences. 2006; 6(2):93- 97. [PubMed]
10. Li, SQ, Tan HZ, Li, XL, et al. A study on the health status of residents affected by flood disaster. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2004; 25:36-39. [PubMed]
11. French JG, Ing R, Von Allmen S, et al. Mortality from flash flood: A review of National Weather Service Reports. Public Health Reports. 1983; 98:584-588. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Kahn M. The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2005; 87(2):271-284.
13. Dartmouth Flood Observatory: Global Active Archive of Large Flood Events. Available at http:/// Accessed July 2007 and August 2009.
14. StataCorp. Chicago, IL. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11.0.
15. Duclos P, Vidonne O, Beuf P, et al. (1991). Flash flood disaster--Nimes, France, 1988. European Journal of Epidemiology, 7(4), 365-371. [PubMed]
16. Siddique AK. Baqui AH. Eusof A, et al. 1988 floods in Bangladesh - pattern of illness and causes of death. Journal of Diarrhoeal Diseases Research. 1991; 9(4):310-314. [PubMed]
17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Morbidity surveillance following the Midwest flood--Missouri, 1993. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1993; 42(41):797-798. [PubMed]
18. Duke C, Bon E, Reeves J, et al. (1994). Flood-related mortality - Georgia, July 4-14, 1994. MMWR. 1994; 43(29):526-530.
19. Staes C, Orengo JC, Malilay J, et al. Deaths due to flash floods in Puerto Rico, January 1992: Implications for prevention. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1994; 23(5): 968-975. [PubMed]
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Storm-related mortality--central Texas, October 17-31, 1998. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2000; 49(7): 133-135. [PubMed]
21. Rashid SF. The urban poor in Dhaka city: Their struggles and coping strategies during the floods of 1998. Disasters. 2000; 24(3); 240-253. [PubMed]
22. Yale JD. Cole TB, Garrison HG, et al. Motor vehicle-related drowning deaths associated with inland flooding after Hurricane Floyd: A field investigation. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2003; 4(4):279-284. [PubMed]
23. Pradhan EK, West KP, Katz J, et al. Risk of flood-related mortality in Nepal. Disasters. 2007; 31(1):57-70. [PubMed]
24. Baxter PJ. The east coast big flood, 31 January-1 February 1953: A summary of the human disaster. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Series A). 2005; 363(1831): 1293-1312. [PubMed]
25. Gerritsen H. What happened in 1953? The big flood in the Netherlands in retrospect. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (Series A), 2005; 363(1831):1271-1291. [PubMed]
26. Spencer J and Myer R. A population and economic overview of Cambria County, Pennsylvania following the 1977 Johnstown flood. Disaster Prevention and Management. 2007; 16(2):259-264.
27. Grigg NS, Doesken NJ, Frick DM, et al. Fort Collins flood 1997: Comprehensive view of an extreme event. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 1999; 125(5):255-262.
28. Jonkman SN, Maaskant B, Boyd E, et al. Loss of life caused by the flooding of New Orleans after Hurrican Katrina: Analysis of the relationship between flood characteristics and mortality. Risk Analysis. 2009; 29(5):676-698. [PubMed]
29. Ahern M, Kovats RS, Wilkinson P, et al. Global health impact of floods: epidemiological evidence. Epidemiologic Reviews; 2005 27(1):36-46.
30. Beyhun N, Altintas KH and Noji, E. Analysis of registered floods in Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Medicine. 2005; 3(1-4): 50-54.
31. Tarhule A. Damaging rainfall and flooding: The other Sahel hazards. Climatic Change. 2005; 72(3), 355-377.
32. Ogden CL, Gibbs-Scharf LI, Kohn MA et al. (2001). Emergency health surveillance after severe flooding in Louisiana, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 1995; 16(3):138-144. [PubMed]
33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Morbidity surveillance following the Midwest flood--Missouri, 1993. MMWR. 1993; 42(41):97-798. [PubMed]
34. Cariappa MP and Khanduri P. Health emergencies in large populations: The Orissa experience. Medical Journal of the Armed Forces of India. 2003; 59(4):286-289.
35. Schnitzler J, Benzler J, Altmann D, et al. Survey on the population's needs and the public health response during floods in Germany 2002. Public Health Management and Practice. 2007; 13(5):461-464. [PubMed]
36. Biswas A, Rahman A, Mashreky S, et al. Unintentional injuries and parental violence against children during flood: a study in rural Bangladesh. Rural and Remote Health. 2010; 10:1199. [PubMed]
37. Sanchez-Crispin A an d Propin-Frejomil E. Social and economic dimensions of the 1998 extreme floods in coastal Chiapas, Mexico. IAHS-AISH Publication. 2002;(271):385-390.
38. Berz, G. Flood disasters: Lessons from the past - worries for the future. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Water, Maritime and Energy. 2000;142(1):3-8.
39. Graham W. A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam failure. Dam Safety Office Report 99-06. USBR: Denver CO, 1999.
40. Stromberg, D. Natural Disasters, Economic Development, and Humanitarian Aid. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2007; 21(3):199-222.
41. UNISDR. Linking disaster risk reduction and poverty reduction: good practices and lessons learned. Geneva: UNISDR, 2008.
42. Haque C. Perspectives of natural disasters in East and South Asia and the Pacific Island States: socioeconomic correlates and needs assessment. Natural Hazards. 2003; 29:465-483.
43. Lllewellyn M. Floods and Tsunamis. Surgical clinics of North America. 2006; 86:557-578. [PubMed]
44. French J, Ing R, Von Allmen S, et al. Mortality from flash floods: A review of national weather service reports, 1969-81. Public Health Reports. 1983; 98(6):584-588. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Mooney LE. Applications and implications of fatality statistics to the flash flood problem. The American Meteorological Society Fifth Conference on Hydrometeorology, 1983. Preprints, p127–129.
46. Coates L. Flood fatalities in Australia, 1788–1996. Australian Geographer. 1999; 30:391–408.
47. Chowdhury AR, Mushtaque AU, Bhuyia AY, et al. The Bangladesh Cyclone of 1991: Why So Many People Died. Disasters. 1993; 17(4):291–304. [PubMed]
48. Jonkman SN and Vrijling JK. Loss of life due to floods. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2008; 1: 43-56.
49. FitzGerald G, Du W, Jamal A, et al. Flood fatalities in contemporary Australia (1997-2008). Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2010; 22:80-186. [PubMed]
50. Guha-Sapir, D. Natural and man-made disasters: the vulnerability of women-headed households and children without families. World Health Statistics Quarterly. 1993; 46:227-233. [PubMed]
51. Creel L. Ripple effects: Population and coastal regions. Population Reference Bureau. 2003. URL:
52. UN Habitat. State of the World’s Cities 2010/2011: Bridging the Urban Divide. March 18, 2010. UN Human Settlements Programme: Nairobi, Kenya.
53. Janerich D T, Stark AD, Greenwald P, et al. Increased leukemia, lymphoma, and spontaneous abortion in Western New York following a flood disaster. Public Health Reports. 1981; 96(4):350-356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
54. Bich TH, Quang LN, Ha LTT, Hanh TTD, Guha-Sapir D. Impacts of flood on health: epidemiologic evidence from Hanoi, Vietnam. Global Healh Action. 2011; 4:6356. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Mortality from tornadoes, hurricanes, and floods. Statistical Bulletin of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. 1974; 55:4-7. [PubMed]
56. Avakyan AB and Istomina MN. Floods in the world late in the XX century. Water Resources. 2000; 27(5): 469-475.
57. Guzzetti F, Stark CP, Salvati P. Evaluation of flood and landslide risk to the population of Italy. Environmental Management. 2005; 36(1):15-36. [PubMed]
58. Lastoria B, Simonetti MR, Casaioli M, et al. Socio-economic impacts of major floods in Italy from 1951 to 2003. Advances in Geosciences. 2006; 7:223-229.
59. United Nations Development Program. Human Development Reports. (2009). Available at: Accessed May 18, 2010.

Articles from PLoS Currents are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science