Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Mamm Genome. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 May 3.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3643810

The emerging role for rat models in gene discovery


Rat models have been used for many decades to study physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms. Prior to the release of the rat genome and new technologies for targeting gene manipulation, the rat had been the underdog in the genomics era, despite the abundance of physiological data compared to the mouse. The overarching goal of biomedical research is to improve health and advance medical science. Translating human disease gene discovery and validation in the rat, through the use of emerging technologies and integrated tools and databases, is providing power to understand the genetics, environmental influences, and biology of disease. In this review, we will briefly outline the rat models, bioinformatic tools, and technologies that are changing the landscape of translational research. The strategies used to translate disease traits to genes to function, and ultimately, to improve human health will be discussed. Finally, our perspectives on how rat models will continue to positively impact biomedical research will be provided.


The traditional role for the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus) has been to study biological traits and disease mechanisms with the goals of understanding both the normal pathways and identifying gene variants that lead to disease. The rat has long been used for laboratory studies, primarily due to its size, behavior, biology, and cost to maintain in comparison to larger mammals, including primates, and continues to be the preferred animal model for safety and toxicology testing (Kunert et al. 2006; Serikawa et al. 2009). All major organ systems have been extensively studied in the rat, making it an ideal model for systems biology and translational studies. Interestingly, the prevalence of the rat in biomedical research literature is second only to humans (Jacob 2010). The rat genome was released in 2004 (Gibbs et al. 2004), greatly facilitating comparative genomics and cross-species data integration and paving the way for targeted gene manipulation. Although mouse models have had a clear advantage for experimental genetics due to the availability of embryonic stem cells, rat models have been widely used for translational research due to a wealth of phenotypic data and its physiological similarities to humans (Huang et al. 2011).

A survey of PubMed content demonstrates the dominance of the laboratory rat as a research model (Fig. 1). While the mouse is king in some research areas such as immunology and cancers, for most organs and physiological and metabolic systems, the rat is historically favored and is the principal model in many preclinical studies especially related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic inflammatory diseases, age related diseases and behavioral studies. Interestingly, however, the pace of mouse research changed significantly after the first knockout mouse was published in 1990 (Fig. 1b), demonstrating the capability of engineering the mouse genome through embryonic stem cell (ESC) technology (Thomas and Capecchi 1990). To move between human and animal model studies for translational research requires the ability to attach physiological data to the genome as well as the ability to manipulate the genome. The powerful ability to remove (knockout) specific genes led to an explosion of new approaches that were not previously available to vertebrate model systems and thus the mouse has more phenotypes associated with single genes. The persistence of the mouse as a genetic model continues more than 20 years later, with more genetic tools and genomic resources available. However, during this time, the rat has developed a number of resources and tools of its own and has made enormous strides in the area of genetic engineering in the past three years.

Fig. 1
Results from the NCBI PubMed biomedical literature database. 1a: Total number of references by disease (left panel) or organ system (right panel) in mice (open bars) and rats (solid bars); 1b: Left panel: Total publications for rats (solid symbols) and ...

According to the Rat Genome Database (RGD,, nearly 650 inbred rat strains have been used to study specific phenotypes associated with a wide range of disease characteristics. In addition, many other strain types, including consomic, congenic, recombinant inbred, transgenic, and spontaneous or chemically induced knockout models, have been frequently used to identify genetic variants that impact disease progression, providing important contributions toward identification of genes underlying polygenic traits (Aitman et al. 2008). The isolation of the first germline competent ESCs from rat and alternative technologies for targeted gene manipulation are now in the genetic toolbox for the rats. Indeed, the translational utility of the rat is rapidly improving due to these emerging technologies, bioinformatic tools and databases, and an ever growing wealth of physiological data.

From Genes to Function to Personalized Medicine

The road from gene identification, to validation, and ultimately to improving human health relies heavily on studies in animal model systems. Human linkage studies focused on groups of people with and without disease or on presence or absence of a disease trait (e.g. hypertension) to map regions with significant contribution to a trait using genetic markers. Likewise, genome wide association studies (GWAS) examine the entire genome with larger populations and have resulted in the identification of many loci implicated in cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and other diseases (Hindorff 2011; Manolio et al. 2008). Both linkage and association studies have been extremely powerful for identifying candidate gene variants. However, without follow up studies on the many implicated loci, the GWAS results are simply associations and do not translate the variation into altered function and cause of disease. These regions then need to be further dissected to identify and validate causative variation. Rat models provide an ideal platform for interrogating this variation, and resulting functional consequences, to find potential cures or drug targets for complex diseases. These animal studies are now generating important data about genes and pathways involved in complex human diseases.

An advantage of using in inbred animal models includes the ability to control both the environmental and genetic conditions which, in turn, facilitates the discovery of such genes, pathways and can be translated to human populations through the use of comparative genomics. Many of the existing rat disease models have been developed through selective breeding for phenotypes of interest such as hypertension, autoimmune disease, arthritis, cancer, and lung diseases (Jacob 2010). Prior to the availability of new technologies, positional cloning efforts in these models focused on narrowing genomic regions involved in complex disease traits. Even with the genome sequence, (Gibbs et al. 2004) this strategy is a time consuming and expensive process if mapping of traits to the genome begins with two inbred strains.

Chromosomal substitution strains (consomic) were derived by introgressing a single chromosome from one inbred strain (donor strain) to the background of another inbred strain (recipient strain) (Roman et al. 2002). From these consomic strains, congenic strains can be rapidly generated (Cowley et al. 2004) (Fig. 2, left panel) and have a greater statistical power to detect linkage over traditional F2 crosses (Shao et al. 2010). The feasibility of this approach has been demonstrated by an mapping cardiovascular (Cowley et al. 2001), renal disease (Mattson et al. 2008; Schulz et al. 2010), vascular function (Kunert et al. 2006; Kunert et al. 2010), pulmonary hypertension (Bonnet et al. 2006), respiratory control traits (Dwinell et al. 2005), metabolic syndrome (Gilibert et al. 2008), and tumor susceptibility (Adamovic et al. 2008; Adamovic et al. 2010) in the consomic panels derived from the SS (Dahl salt sensitive) and BN (Brown Norway) strains. For example, hypertension QTLs in these models have recently been reduced to single centimorgan sized regions (Joe et al. 2009; Moreno et al. 2011b).

Fig. 2
Diagram outlining some of the strategies used to identify candidate genes for disease traits. Left panel depicts the more traditional approach of using F2 crosses for QTL identification or animal breeding strategies to narrow the genomic region containing ...

Other strategies have been successfully used to map complex disease traits, such as hypertension and metabolic disorders, to the genome include recombinant inbred strains and heterogeneous stock rats. Recombinant inbred (RI) strains are panels of strains that are derived by inbreeding multiple independent lines from an F2 population established from a cross of two inbred strains. The F2 rats are brother-sister mated for more than 20 generations to ensure a fixed genome. The BXH/HXB RI strains were derived from crosses of SHR/Ola and BN-Lx/Cub to produce 20 HXB and BXH RI strains each (Pravenec et al. 1989). These strains have been used to map traits associated with hypertension and metabolic syndrome in a wide variety of tissues and, in combination with gene expression analysis, have identified several candidate genes (Pravenec and Kurtz 2010). Since each RI strain is inbred, follow-up studies can be done on genetically identical animals.

Alternatively, the heterogeneous stock (HS) strains were derived from eight genetically and phenotypically diverse inbred founder strains and then bred for more than 40 generations using a strategy to minimize inbreeding to produce a colony in which each rat is a unique genetic mosaic of the founders (Solberg Woods et al. 2010a). The advantage to this strategy is that the design is similar to human population studies with many possible alleles at any given loci compared to inbred and RI strains with only two alleles at each loci. In this strategy, since each individual animal is genetically unique, follow-up studies on genetically identical rats is not possible, but the great strength of this approach is the ability for rapid fine-mapping of traits since the recombination interval is approximately 2 cM (Mott et al. 2000). With the recent advances in genome technologies, including high-throughput sequencing and high-density SNP chips, further genetic analysis on these strains can be done. This approach has been used successfully for narrowing regions for glucose regulation (Solberg Woods et al. 2010a), bone fragility (Alam et al. 2011), alcohol drinking (Bice et al. 2010), fear (Johannesson et al. 2009), and renal traits (Solberg Woods et al. 2010b).

In some cases, these and other strategies have been used to identify genes for certain phenotypes, although positional cloning has been more successful for monogenic traits (Aitman et al. 2008). The stream of genes associated with complex traits has significantly increased in the past few years due to the combination of new technologies for gene disruption (Petretto et al. 2008; Pravenec et al. 2008a; Pravenec et al. 2008b; Rangel-Filho et al. 2005), advances in sequencing and mapping, and new computational tools available for the rat. In a supreme demonstration, this strategy of using inbred rat models to identify and model specific genes and pathways which can then be translated to humans is highlighted by the landmark papers describing functional Adducin 1 gene variants causing hypertension in both in rats and in humans and the progress of Rostafuroxin in phase 2 clinical trials (Ferrandi et al. 2010; Lanzani et al. 2010).

Bioinformatic Tools and Data

Concomitant with developing animal resources, developing bioinformatic tools and cataloging data sets are needed to keep up with the volume and variety of data, including strains, genome sequence, including whole genome, exome, and transcriptome, tissue specific (e.g. expression), and physiological data . RGD incorporates information on the more than 650 inbred rat strains, including substrains of the original inbred strains, and also an additional 2275 rat models that have been used to study the genetics of complex disease. These models include consomic, congenic, recombinant inbred, conplastic, transgenic, and strains with targeted mutations. A full listing of all strains used to study disease or map biological traits to the genome are available on the RGD FTP site for download ( In total, RGD has curated more than 1850 QTLs for 103 traits mapped to various rat chromosomes by these mapping strategies over a broad range of confidence intervals. Through partnerships with NCBI/Entrez Gene, IPI (International Protein Index), Ensemble, UCSC genome browser, Gene Ontology Consortium, Gene Ontology Annotations (GOA) at European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), and the Mouse Genome Database (MGD), RGD provides access to curated integrated sequence, gene, mapping, and strain datasets acquired through user submission, manual curation from literature, automated pipelines from other scientific databases, and through local bioinformatic analyses (Dwinell et al. 2009). In addition to current rat data, homology data between rat, mouse and human is captured and updated weekly through automated ortholog relationship and nomenclature pipelines. Finally, RGD data is obtained and displayed by other global genomic resources such as NCBI Ensemble and UCSC to facilitate the entire research community.

The ability to link an animal model by gene, physiological trait, and quantitative trait locus (QTL) offers the prospect for building more accurate animal models of human disease (Fig. 3). With the rapid increase in SNP-trait associations published in GWAS, it has also become clear that many associations are common, associated with modest effect sizes, and often within noncoding regions (Hindorff et al. 2009). Correlations between rat and human QTLs is an important step in building animal disease models. Another important function of RGD is to develop the many tools for querying genes, genomic features, sequence, ontology annotations, protein, and comparative data across rat, mouse and human and have been reviewed recently (Twigger et al. 2008; Worthey et al. 2010). RGD's genome browser (GBrowse, http:// is undergoing an update to specifically allow seamless movement between human and rat GBrowse, making cross-species comparisons of critical genomic elements possible (Fig. 4). The update includes the ability to add tracks for objects such as QTLs, SNPs, strains, and gene models. The user can begin browsing for a gene, QTL, or region for rat or human and then layer on corresponding data from human or rat through the identification of syntenic blocks and objects linked to those blocks. A similar approach can be used to compare SNPs and linkage disequilibrium blocks from human studies to mapped rat QTL regions. These types of comparisons can narrow regions of interest significantly, reducing the number of genes to prioritize for functional follow up studies.

Fig. 3
Diagram highlighting the approaches available for use of animal models for translational biology with the need for bioinformatic tools to integrate gene and phenotype data.
Fig. 4
The Rat Genome Database (RGD) genome browser (GBrowse) allows users to view overlap between human and rat QTLs through synteny. 4a: Browser with Human genome build 36.3 on chromosome 17 with blood pressure QTL shown in red and blue solid lines (first ...

Identifying Candidate Disease Genes

To test candidate genes mapped by crosses in rats or to validate candidate genes found in human studies, a common approach is to disrupt gene function and measure the impact on specific phenotypes. Most recently, methods for specific gene targeting have changed the way rat models can and are being used for these types of studies, and provide the basis for crucial studies to study the role of candidate-disease causing genes contributing to normal biological processes, how specific variants alter these normal processes, and how these disrupted processes result in disease. Traditional transgenic approaches by DNA microinjection of rat embryos have been established for more than 20 years, resulting in thousands of published studies (Jacob et al. 2010), however, for specifically disrupting gene function, many attempts to derive useful embryonic stem cells from rat strains have failed. It wasn't until late 2008 that independent reports by Qilong Ying and his mentor, Austin Smith, illuminated the path to germline competent embryonic stem cells (gcESCs) from the rat using specific small molecule inhibitors to suppress key differentiation triggers (Buehr et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008). With some coaxing, these cells have now been demonstrated to be amenable to genetic manipulation by homologous gene targeting (Tong et al. 2010) and others have followed and perhaps improved on the inhibitor media formulations to increase the number of gcESC lines from various genetic backgrounds (Kawamata and Ochiya 2010). Theoretically, induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs) from different strains could serve as a platform for genetic manipulation such as gene knockout, knockin and conditional mutagenesis if they were proven to be germline competent. To date, we are aware of three groups deriving rat IPSCs using a variety of approaches (Chang et al. 2010; Li et al. 2009; Liao et al. 2009), all by combining genetic reprogramming with variations of the aforementioned inhibitor media cocktails. These reported cell lines share many pluripotent attributes with IPSCs and ESCs from mice and humans such as the ability to differentiate in to tissues from the three germ layers, although none have yet reported germline transmission as has been shown for mouse.

ENU (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea) mutagenesis has been successfully used by several groups to target genes for the development of specific genetic models (van Boxtel et al. 2008; Mashimo et al. 2008; Zan et al. 2003). Specific examples of the utility of this method include models for febrile seizures (Mashimo et al. 2010a), a novel adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) model (Yoshimi et al. 2009), and a 5-HT transporter (SERT) knockout model (Olivier et al. 2008). This strategy has been extended by the Kyoto University Mutant Rat Archive (KURMA) to develop a resource of cryopreserved sperm from thousands of first generation offspring of ENU-mutagenized males. DNA from these offspring can be screened prior to intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection to produce a rat, thus making this strategy more efficient (Mashimo et al. 2008). Although ENU mutagenesis is often used for phenotype-driven approaches, the use of this strategy for a reverse genetics approaches has resulted in rat knockout models and an archive for producing thousands of models in the future.

We and others have recently developed an alternative and rapid approach using Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFNs) which have the ability to target and disrupt genes directly in the rat embryo (Geurts et al. 2009; Mashimo et al. 2010b; Moreno et al. 2011a). ZFNs are engineered proteins which can be customized to interact with an investigator-specified sequence, such as the coding sequence of a gene of interest, and introduce a mutation. Delivered by standard pronuclear microinjection procedures as ZFN encoding messenger RNA, these molecules have a single purpose: to find their target sequence and introduce a double strand break in the target chromosome sequence. Innate DNA repair mechanisms activate to repair these breaks and, in the process, a mutation is often introduced (Geurts and Moreno 2010). More recently, it has been shown that by co-introducing a targeting plasmid vector with homologous sequences, one can stimulate homologous gene targeting to knock in sequences directly in both the mouse and rat embryo (Cui et al. 2011; Meyer et al. 2010). This technology, therefore, can be applied for both gene knockout and knockin directly in the embryo. The major advantages of this approach are speed and the ability to apply ZFNs to any rat strain which is amenable to obtaining embryos for microinjection. From gene selection to knockout animal can take less than 4 months and we have now applied this approach to many genes across inbred, outbred, consomic and congenic strains covering seven genetic backgrounds (Table 1). The ability to apply gene disruption technology at this pace across many disease models strains has not been possible in the past, even in mouse, because of limitations in which strains useful gcESCs have been derived.

Summary of genes targeted using the Zinc Finger Nuclease strategy as part of the PhysGen Knockout program ( The stage of development for each strain is indicated by 1) injected with ZFN (I), 2) backcrossing or intercrossing ...

We have already begun capitalizing on the ZFN knockout approach to address the significant challenge created by the identification of hundreds of genetic variants for many disease traits through GWAS. The PhysGen Knockout team ( at the Medical College of Wisconsin has been targeting GWAS genes using the ZFN technology to develop sensitized rat models with targeted mutations for studies aimed at testing the physiological function and the role of these genes in disease progression (Fig. 2, right panel). This program is on track to hit 100 genes in 2 years and phenotype at least 20 of these strains for cardiovascular, renal and vascular traits, demonstrating the speed and efficiency of this approach. Adding the phenotypic characterization of these strains to the existing foundation of rat physiological data will also be of great value.

Translation from Human to Rat and Back Again

Translational research is about transforming progress in basic research into products and procedures that benefit patients. Basic research, using both patients and experimental models, is the only method to accelerate personalized medicine. Progress in translational research is limited by inadequate understanding of the processes during the development and progression of disease. The use of animal models in the study of human complex traits is irreplaceable. A worldwide effort, both in funding and infrastructure, is advancing the use of the rat in comparative genomics, bioinformatics tools, sequencing, model development, and development rat embryonic stem cells (Aitman et al. 2008), all in combination with detailed physiological profiling to provide a powerful translational tool.

The tremendous progress of sequencing technologies and the advent of GWAS had led to an explosion of the number of genetic variants associated with complex diseases. However, progress to understand mechanisms of diseases has been slow. Thus far, there have only been a few loci where the association signal includes a nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) triggering a functional characterization. Moreover, the majority of sequence variants have been found in intergenic sequences and some of identified loci reside close to genes whose functions are still unknown. Additionally, the small affect size indicates that others factors such as multiple rare and low-penetrance variations and interacting environmental factors are involved in final phenotype which compromises the translation from signal to function.

Different approaches are available to translate findings in human GWAS and sequencing to animal models and vice versa. One example used recombinant inbred strains to study gene networks and their regulatory loci. These data were integrated with human gene expression and GWAS data to identify genes, networks and pathways for human disease (Heinig et al. 2010). Another successful approach has been to use comparative genomics to identify genes most likely to be responsible for regulating plasma lipid levels in humans by integrating GWAS candidate loci, human cis-expression QTL and conserved co-expression modules between human, mouse and rat (Wang et al. 2009). Comparative genomics is also well suited to further resolve a GWA locus and identify the best candidate gene(s). Comparison of human GWA loci with concordant QTLs identified in mouse and rat may facilitate detection of functionally conserved genes and regulatory region (Moreno et al. 2008). Recently, a pediatric patient benefited from whole exome sequencing, followed by an analysis and diagnose that relied upon comparative genomics, to detect the presence of functional SNPs which lead to a diagnosis and treatment (Mayer et al. 2011; Worthey et al. 2011). In the process of analyzing the whole exome sequence in this young child, a bioinformatics tool was developed to validate the sequence capture, type of variant, predict impact through algorithms, and utilize database annotations to provide functional information related to the SNPs to assist the physicians in diagnosis (Worthey et al. 2011). Current adaptation of this tool for use with rat strain sequence will be of great value in the use of disease models for discovery and translation.

On the Horizon

The use of rat models for biomedical research is growing due to the availability of genetic technologies and the wealth of existing phenotype data. Now that these technologies are in place nearly 20 years after the first knockout mouse was published (Fig. 1b, arrows), they promise to enable many new cellular and genetic approaches in the most widely studied model system. The rapid growth of sequence data for both humans and model organisms is changing the strategy used to identify and validate candidate disease genes. The rat Brown Norway reference sequence is currently being updated, but the most exciting prospect is the availability of other inbred strain sequences. Several strains have already been sequenced and are currently being assembled and annotated to allow investigators to query across commonly used strains (Abbott 2009, 2010; Pravenec and Kurtz 2010). Other new technologies, such as RNAseq for transcriptome sequencing, allow for full genomic characterization of strains. With these additional types of data, strain-specific characterization could include quantification of transcript levels, integration with genomic sequence to assess allelic specific expression, and could also be used to detect strain specific splice variants. Significant challenges exist with the onslaught of strain sequencing, including streamlined methods to detect variants, validate the results, provide annotation, and informatics tools for analysis. The ongoing improvements in rat resources for functional studies will speed future translational efforts and rate of discovery of risk alleles from genome-scale resequencing efforts.


This work was supported in part by NIH NHLBI grants 5RC2HL101681 and 5R01HL082798. We would like to thank the Rat Genome Database curation and programming staff (Rajni Nigam, Marek Tutaj, Pushkala Jayaraman) for the preparation of data and figures used within this manuscript.


  • Abbott A. Return of the rat. Nature. 2009;460:788. [PubMed]
  • Abbott A. Neuroscience: The rat pack. Nature. 2010;465:282–283. [PubMed]
  • Adamovic T, McAllister D, Rowe JJ, Wang T, Jacob HJ, Sugg SL. Genetic mapping of mammary tumor traits to rat chromosome 10 using a novel panel of consomic rats. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2008;186:41–48. [PubMed]
  • Adamovic T, McAllister D, Wang T, Adamovic D, Rowe JJ, Moreno C, Lazar J, Jacob HJ, Sugg SL. Identification of novel carcinogen-mediated mammary tumor susceptibility loci in the rat using the chromosome substitution technique. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49:1035–1045. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Aitman TJ, Critser JK, Cuppen E, Dominiczak A, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flint J, Gauguier D, Geurts AM, Gould M, Harris PC, Holmdahl R, Hubner N, Izsvak Z, Jacob HJ, Kuramoto T, Kwitek AE, Marrone A, Mashimo T, Moreno C, Mullins J, Mullins L, Olsson T, Pravenec M, Riley L, Saar K, Serikawa T, Shull JD, Szpirer C, Twigger SN, Voigt B, Worley K. Progress and prospects in rat genetics: a community view. Nat Genet. 2008;40:516–522. [PubMed]
  • Alam I, Koller DL, Sun Q, Roeder RK, Canete T, Blazquez G, Lopez-Aumatell R, Martinez-Membrives E, Vicens-Costa E, Mont C, Diaz S, Tobena A, Fernandez-Teruel A, Whitley A, Strid P, Diez M, Johannesson M, Flint J, Econs MJ, Turner CH, Foroud T. Heterogeneous stock rat: A unique animal model for mapping genes influencing bone fragility. Bone 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bice PJ, Liang T, Zhang L, Graves TJ, Carr LG, Lai D, Kimpel MW, Foroud T. Fine mapping and expression of candidate genes within the chromosome 10 QTL region of the high and low alcohol-drinking rats. Alcohol. 2010;44:477–485. [PubMed]
  • Bonnet S, Michelakis ED, Porter CJ, Andrade-Navarro MA, Thebaud B, Haromy A, Harry G, Moudgil R, McMurtry MS, Weir EK, Archer SL. An abnormal mitochondrial-hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha-Kv channel pathway disrupts oxygen sensing and triggers pulmonary arterial hypertension in fawn hooded rats: similarities to human pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation. 2006;113:2630–2641. [PubMed]
  • Buehr M, Meek S, Blair K, Yang J, Ure J, Silva J, McLay R, Hall J, Ying QL, Smith A. Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell. 2008;135:1287–1298. [PubMed]
  • Chang MY, Kim D, Kim CH, Kang HC, Yang E, Moon JI, Ko S, Park J, Park KS, Lee KA, Hwang DY, Chung Y, Lanza R, Kim KS. Direct reprogramming of rat neural precursor cells and fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cowley AW, Jr, Liang M, Roman RJ, Greene AS, Jacob HJ. Consomic rat model systems for physiological genomics. Acta Physiol Scand. 2004;181:585–592. [PubMed]
  • Cowley AW, Jr, Roman RJ, Kaldunski ML, Dumas P, Dickhout JG, Greene AS, Jacob HJ. Brown Norway chromosome 13 confers protection from high salt to consomic Dahl S rat. Hypertension. 2001;37:456–461. [PubMed]
  • Cui X, Ji D, Fisher DA, Wu Y, Briner DM, Weinstein EJ. Targeted integration in rat and mouse embryos with zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:64–67. [PubMed]
  • Dwinell MR, Forster HV, Petersen J, Rider A, Kunert MP, Cowley AW, Jr, Jacob HJ. Genetic determinants on rat chromosome 6 modulate variation in the hypercapnic ventilatory response using consomic strains. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:1630–1638. [PubMed]
  • Dwinell MR, Worthey EA, Shimoyama M, Bakir-Gungor B, DePons J, Laulederkind S, Lowry T, Nigram R, Petri V, Smith J, Stoddard A, Twigger SN, Jacob HJ. The Rat Genome Database 2009: variation, ontologies and pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D744–749. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ferrandi M, Molinari I, Torielli L, Padoani G, Salardi S, Rastaldi MP, Ferrari P, Bianchi G. Adducin- and ouabain-related gene variants predict the antihypertensive activity of rostafuroxin, part 1: experimental studies. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:59ra86. [PubMed]
  • Geurts AM, Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Zeitler B, Miller JC, Choi VM, Jenkins SS, Wood A, Cui X, Meng X, Vincent A, Lam S, Michalkiewicz M, Schilling R, Foeckler J, Kalloway S, Weiler H, Menoret S, Anegon I, Davis GD, Zhang L, Rebar EJ, Gregory PD, Urnov FD, Jacob HJ, Buelow R. Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science. 2009;325:433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Geurts AM, Moreno C. Zinc-finger nucleases: new strategies to target the rat genome. Clin Sci (Lond) 2010;119:303–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Sodergren EJ, Scherer S, Scott G, Steffen D, Worley KC, Burch PE, Okwuonu G, Hines S, Lewis L, DeRamo C, Delgado O, Dugan-Rocha S, Miner G, Morgan M, Hawes A, Gill R, Celera, Holt RA, Adams MD, Amanatides PG, Baden-Tillson H, Barnstead M, Chin S, Evans CA, Ferriera S, Fosler C, Glodek A, Gu Z, Jennings D, Kraft CL, Nguyen T, Pfannkoch CM, Sitter C, Sutton GG, Venter JC, Woodage T, Smith D, Lee HM, Gustafson E, Cahill P, Kana A, Doucette-Stamm L, Weinstock K, Fechtel K, Weiss RB, Dunn DM, Green ED, Blakesley RW, Bouffard GG, De Jong PJ, Osoegawa K, Zhu B, Marra M, Schein J, Bosdet I, Fjell C, Jones S, Krzywinski M, Mathewson C, Siddiqui A, Wye N, McPherson J, Zhao S, Fraser CM, Shetty J, Shatsman S, Geer K, Chen Y, Abramzon S, Nierman WC, Havlak PH, Chen R, Durbin KJ, Egan A, Ren Y, Song XZ, Li B, Liu Y, Qin X, Cawley S, Cooney AJ, D'Souza LM, Martin K, Wu JQ, Gonzalez-Garay ML, Jackson AR, Kalafus KJ, McLeod MP, Milosavljevic A, Virk D, Volkov A, Wheeler DA, Zhang Z, Bailey JA, Eichler EE, Tuzun E, Birney E, Mongin E, Ureta-Vidal A, Woodwark C, Zdobnov E, Bork P, Suyama M, Torrents D, Alexandersson M, Trask BJ, Young JM, Huang H, Wang H, Xing H, Daniels S, Gietzen D, Schmidt J, Stevens K, Vitt U, Wingrove J, Camara F, Mar Alba M, Abril JF, Guigo R, Smit A, Dubchak I, Rubin EM, Couronne O, Poliakov A, Hubner N, Ganten D, Goesele C, Hummel O, Kreitler T, Lee YA, Monti J, Schulz H, Zimdahl H, Himmelbauer H, Lehrach H, Jacob HJ, Bromberg S, Gullings-Handley J, Jensen-Seaman MI, Kwitek AE, Lazar J, Pasko D, Tonellato PJ, Twigger S, Ponting CP, Duarte JM, Rice S, Goodstadt L, Beatson SA, Emes RD, Winter EE, Webber C, Brandt P, Nyakatura G, Adetobi M, Chiaromonte F, Elnitski L, Eswara P, Hardison RC, Hou M, Kolbe D, Makova K, Miller W, Nekrutenko A, Riemer C, Schwartz S, Taylor J, Yang S, Zhang Y, Lindpaintner K, Andrews TD, Caccamo M, Clamp M, Clarke L, Curwen V, Durbin R, Eyras E, Searle SM, Cooper GM, Batzoglou S, Brudno M, Sidow A, Stone EA, Payseur BA, Bourque G, Lopez-Otin C, Puente XS, Chakrabarti K, Chatterji S, Dewey C, Pachter L, Bray N, Yap VB, Caspi A, Tesler G, Pevzner PA, Haussler D, Roskin KM, Baertsch R, Clawson H, Furey TS, Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Kent WJ, Rosenbloom KR, Trumbower H, Weirauch M, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Ma B, Brent M, Arumugam M, Shteynberg D, Copley RR, Taylor MS, Riethman H, Mudunuri U, Peterson J, Guyer M, Felsenfeld A, Old S, Mockrin S, Collins F. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature. 2004;428:493–521. [PubMed]
  • Gilibert S, Kwitek AE, Hubner N, Tschannen M, Jacob HJ, Sassard J, Bataillard A. Effects of chromosome 17 on features of the metabolic syndrome in the Lyon hypertensive rat. Physiol Genomics. 2008;33:212–217. [PubMed]
  • Heinig M, Petretto E, Wallace C, Bottolo L, Rotival M, Lu H, Li Y, Sarwar R, Langley SR, Bauerfeind A, Hummel O, Lee YA, Paskas S, Rintisch C, Saar K, Cooper J, Buchan R, Gray EE, Cyster JG, Erdmann J, Hengstenberg C, Maouche S, Ouwehand WH, Rice CM, Samani NJ, Schunkert H, Goodall AH, Schulz H, Roider HG, Vingron M, Blankenberg S, Munzel T, Zeller T, Szymczak S, Ziegler A, Tiret L, Smyth DJ, Pravenec M, Aitman TJ, Cambien F, Clayton D, Todd JA, Hubner N, Cook SA. A trans-acting locus regulates an anti-viral expression network and type 1 diabetes risk. Nature. 2010;467:460–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hindorff LA, Junkins HA, Hall PN, Mehta JP, Manolio TA. A Catolog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies. 2011.
  • Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS, Manolio TA. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9362–9367. [PubMed]
  • Huang G, Tong C, Kumbhani DS, Ashton C, Yan H, Ying QL. Beyond knockout rats: New insights into finer genome manipulation in rats. Cell Cycle. 2011;10 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jacob HJ. The rat: a model used in biomedical research. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;597:1–11. [PubMed]
  • Jacob HJ, Lazar J, Dwinell MR, Moreno C, Geurts AM. Gene targeting in the rat: advances and opportunities. Trends Genet. 2010;26:510–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Joe B, Saad Y, Lee NH, Frank BC, Achinike OH, Luu TV, Gopalakrishnan K, Toland EJ, Farms P, Yerga-Woolwine S, Manickavasagam E, Rapp JP, Garrett MR, Coe D, Apte SS, Rankinen T, Perusse L, Ehret GB, Ganesh SK, Cooper RS, O'Connor A, Rice T, Weder AB, Chakravarti A, Rao DC, Bouchard C. Positional identification of variants of Adamts16 linked to inherited hypertension. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2825–2838. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Johannesson M, Lopez-Aumatell R, Stridh P, Diez M, Tuncel J, Blazquez G, Martinez-Membrives E, Canete T, Vicens-Costa E, Graham D, Copley RR, Hernandez-Pliego P, Beyeen AD, Ockinger J, Fernandez-Santamaria C, Gulko PS, Brenner M, Tobena A, Guitart-Masip M, Gimenez-Llort L, Dominiczak A, Holmdahl R, Gauguier D, Olsson T, Mott R, Valdar W, Redei EE, Fernandez-Teruel A, Flint J. A resource for the simultaneous high-resolution mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci in rats: the NIH heterogeneous stock. Genome Res. 2009;19:150–158. [PubMed]
  • Kawamata M, Ochiya T. Generation of genetically modified rats from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14223–14228. [PubMed]
  • Kunert MP, Drenjancevic-Peric I, Dwinell MR, Lombard JH, Cowley AW, Jr, Greene AS, Kwitek AE, Jacob HJ. Consomic strategies to localize genomic regions related to vascular reactivity in the Dahl salt-sensitive rat. Physiol Genomics. 2006;26:218–225. [PubMed]
  • Kunert MP, Dwinell MR, Lombard JH. Vascular responses in aortic rings of a consomic rat panel derived from the Fawn Hooded Hypertensive strain. Physiol Genomics. 2010;42A:244–258. [PubMed]
  • Lanzani C, Citterio L, Glorioso N, Manunta P, Tripodi G, Salvi E, Carpini SD, Ferrandi M, Messaggio E, Staessen JA, Cusi D, Macciardi F, Argiolas G, Valentini G, Ferrari P, Bianchi G. Adducin- and ouabain-related gene variants predict the antihypertensive activity of rostafuroxin, part 2: clinical studies. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:59ra87. [PubMed]
  • Li P, Tong C, Mehrian-Shai R, Jia L, Wu N, Yan Y, Maxson RE, Schulze EN, Song H, Hsieh CL, Pera MF, Ying QL. Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts. Cell. 2008;135:1299–1310. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li W, Wei W, Zhu S, Zhu J, Shi Y, Lin T, Hao E, Hayek A, Deng H, Ding S. Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:16–19. [PubMed]
  • Liao J, Cui C, Chen S, Ren J, Chen J, Gao Y, Li H, Jia N, Cheng L, Xiao H, Xiao L. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from adult rat cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:11–15. [PubMed]
  • Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS. A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1590–1605. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mashimo T, Ohmori I, Ouchida M, Ohno Y, Tsurumi T, Miki T, Wakamori M, Ishihara S, Yoshida T, Takizawa A, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Sasa M, Mori Y, Serikawa T. A missense mutation of the gene encoding voltage-dependent sodium channel (Nav1.1) confers susceptibility to febrile seizures in rats. J Neurosci. 2010a;30:5744–5753. [PubMed]
  • Mashimo T, Takizawa A, Voigt B, Yoshimi K, Hiai H, Kuramoto T, Serikawa T. Generation of knockout rats with X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) using zinc-finger nucleases. PLoS One. 2010b;5:e8870. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mashimo T, Yanagihara K, Tokuda S, Voigt B, Takizawa A, Nakajima R, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Kuramoto T, Serikawa T. An ENU-induced mutant archive for gene targeting in rats. Nat Genet. 2008;40:514–515. [PubMed]
  • Mattson DL, Dwinell MR, Greene AS, Kwitek AE, Roman RJ, Jacob HJ, Cowley AW., Jr Chromosome substitution reveals the genetic basis of Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension and renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F837–842. [PubMed]
  • Mayer AN, Dimmock DP, Arca MJ, Bick DP, Verbsky JW, Worthey EA, Jacob HJ, Margolis DA. A timely arrival for genomic medicine. Genet Med. 2011;13:195–196. [PubMed]
  • Meyer M, de Angelis MH, Wurst W, Kuhn R. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15022–15026. [PubMed]
  • Moreno C, Hoffman M, Stodola TJ, Didier DN, Lazar J, Geurts AM, North PE, Jacob HJ, Greene AS. Creation and characterization of a renin knockout rat. Hypertension. 2011a;57:614–619. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Moreno C, Lazar J, Jacob HJ, Kwitek AE. Comparative genomics for detecting human disease genes. Adv Genet. 2008;60:655–697. [PubMed]
  • Moreno C, Williams JM, Lu L, Liang M, Lazar J, Jacob HJ, Cowley AW, Jr, Roman RJ. Narrowing a region on rat chromosome 13 that protects against hypertension in Dahl SS-13BN congenic strains. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011b [PubMed]
  • Mott R, Talbot CJ, Turri MG, Collins AC, Flint J. A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:12649–12654. [PubMed]
  • Olivier JD, Van Der Hart MG, Van Swelm RP, Dederen PJ, Homberg JR, Cremers T, Deen PM, Cuppen E, Cools AR, Ellenbroek BA. A study in male and female 5-HT transporter knockout rats: an animal model for anxiety and depression disorders. Neuroscience. 2008;152:573–584. [PubMed]
  • Petretto E, Sarwar R, Grieve I, Lu H, Kumaran MK, Muckett PJ, Mangion J, Schroen B, Benson M, Punjabi PP, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ, Kiesewetter C, Tasheva ES, Corpuz LM, Webb MD, Conrad GW, Kurtz TW, Kren V, Fischer J, Hubner N, Pinto YM, Pravenec M, Aitman TJ, Cook SA. Integrated genomic approaches implicate osteoglycin (Ogn) in the regulation of left ventricular mass. Nat Genet. 2008;40:546–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pravenec M, Churchill PC, Churchill MC, Viklicky O, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, Petretto E, Hubner N, Wallace CA, Zimdahl H, Zidek V, Landa V, Dunbar J, Bidani A, Griffin K, Qi N, Maxova M, Kren V, Mlejnek P, Wang J, Kurtz TW. Identification of renal Cd36 as a determinant of blood pressure and risk for hypertension. Nat Genet. 2008a;40:952–954. [PubMed]
  • Pravenec M, Kazdova L, Landa V, Zidek V, Mlejnek P, Simakova M, Jansa P, Forejt J, Kren V, Krenova D, Qi N, Wang JM, Chan D, Aitman TJ, Kurtz TW. Identification of mutated Srebf1 as a QTL influencing risk for hepatic steatosis in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 2008b;51:148–153. [PubMed]
  • Pravenec M, Klir P, Kren V, Zicha J, Kunes J. An analysis of spontaneous hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats by means of new recombinant inbred strains. J Hypertens. 1989;7:217–221. [PubMed]
  • Pravenec M, Kurtz TW. Recent advances in genetics of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12:5–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rangel-Filho A, Sharma M, Datta YH, Moreno C, Roman RJ, Iwamoto Y, Provoost AP, Lazar J, Jacob HJ. RF-2 gene modulates proteinuria and albuminuria independently of changes in glomerular permeability in the fawn-hooded hypertensive rat. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:852–856. [PubMed]
  • Roman RJ, Cowley AW, Jr, Greene A, Kwitek AE, Tonellato PJ, Jacob HJ. Consomic rats for the identification of genes and pathways underlying cardiovascular disease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2002;67:309–315. [PubMed]
  • Schulz A, Schutten S, Schulte L, Kossmehl P, Nyengaard JR, Vetter R, Huber M, Kreutz R. Genetic locus on MWF rat chromosome 6 affects kidney damage in response to L-NAME treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Physiol Genomics. 2010;42:126–133. [PubMed]
  • Serikawa T, Mashimo T, Takizawa A, Okajima R, Maedomari N, Kumafuji K, Tagami F, Neoda Y, Otsuki M, Nakanishi S, Yamasaki K, Voigt B, Kuramoto T. National BioResource Project-Rat and related activities. Exp Anim. 2009;58:333–341. [PubMed]
  • Shao H, Sinasac DS, Burrage LC, Hodges CA, Supelak PJ, Palmert MR, Moreno C, Cowley AW, Jr, Jacob HJ, Nadeau JH. Analyzing complex traits with congenic strains. Mamm Genome. 2010;21:276–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Solberg Woods LC, Holl K, Tschannen M, Valdar W. Fine-mapping a locus for glucose tolerance using heterogeneous stock rats. Physiol Genomics. 2010a;41:102–108. [PubMed]
  • Solberg Woods LC, Stelloh C, Regner KR, Schwabe T, Eisenhauer J, Garrett MR. Heterogeneous stock rats: a new model to study the genetics of renal phenotypes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010b;298:F1484–1491. [PubMed]
  • Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Targeted disruption of the murine int-1 proto-oncogene resulting in severe abnormalities in midbrain and cerebellar development. Nature. 1990;346:847–850. [PubMed]
  • Tong C, Li P, Wu NL, Yan Y, Ying QL. Production of p53 gene knockout rats by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2010;467:211–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Twigger SN, Pruitt KD, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Karolchik D, Worley KC, Maglott DR, Brown G, Weinstock G, Gibbs RA, Kent J, Birney E, Jacob HJ. What everybody should know about the rat genome and its online resources. Nat Genet. 2008;40:523–527. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van Boxtel R, Toonen PW, Verheul M, van Roekel HS, Nijman IJ, Guryev V, Cuppen E. Improved generation of rat gene knockouts by target-selected mutagenesis in mismatch repair-deficient animals. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:460. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wang K, Narayanan M, Zhong H, Tompa M, Schadt EE, Zhu J. Meta-analysis of inter-species liver co-expression networks elucidates traits associated with common human diseases. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000616. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Worthey EA, Mayer AN, Syverson GD, Helbling D, Bonacci BB, Decker B, Serpe JM, Dasu T, Tschannen MR, Veith RL, Basehore MJ, Broeckel U, Tomita-Mitchell A, Arca MJ, Casper JT, Margolis DA, Bick DP, Hessner MJ, Routes JM, Verbsky JW, Jacob HJ, Dimmock DP. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease. Genet Med. 2011;13:255–262. [PubMed]
  • Worthey EA, Stoddard AJ, Jacob HJ. Sequencing of the rat genome and databases. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;597:33–53. [PubMed]
  • Yoshimi K, Tanaka T, Takizawa A, Kato M, Hirabayashi M, Mashimo T, Serikawa T, Kuramoto T. Enhanced colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis in a novel Apc mutant rat. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:2022–2027. [PubMed]
  • Zan Y, Haag JD, Chen KS, Shepel LA, Wigington D, Wang YR, Hu R, Lopez-Guajardo CC, Brose HL, Porter KI, Leonard RA, Hitt AA, Schommer SL, Elegbede AF, Gould MN. Production of knockout rats using ENU mutagenesis and a yeast-based screening assay. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:645–651. [PubMed]