PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
ACS Chem Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 May 3.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3643504
NIHMSID: NIHMS464200

Temporal and spatial regulation of microRNA activity with photo-activatable cantimirs

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs which play numerous important roles in physiology and human diseases. During animal development, many miRNAs are expressed continuously from early embryos throughout adults, yet it is unclear whether these miRNAs are actually required at all the stages of development. Current techniques of manipulating microRNA function lack the required spatial and temporal resolution to adequately address the functionality of a given microRNA at a specific time or at single-cell resolution. To examine stage- or cell-specific function of miRNA during development and to achieve precise control of miRNA activity, we have developed photo-activatable antisense oligonucleotides against miRNAs. These caged oligonucleotides can be activated with 365 nm light with extraordinarily high efficiency to release potent antisense reagents to inhibit miRNAs. Initial application of these caged antimirs in a model organism (C. elegans) revealed that the activity of a miRNA (lsy-6) is required specifically around the comma stage during embryonic development to control a left/right asymmetric differentiation program in the C.elegans nervous system. This suggests that a transient input of lsy-6 during development is sufficient to specify the neuronal cell fate. The modular design and the facile assembly of these caged antisense oligonucleotides should facilitate their applications in detailed functional analyses of miRNAs and their target genes.

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs, ~22 nucleotides long, that play diverse roles in development, physiology and human diseases1. A specific miRNA can target many messenger RNAs (mRNAs) by binding to their 3′-untranslated region (3′ UTR) to inhibit mRNA translation and/or stability2. Because of their complex involvement in numerous pathways in different cell types, it is important to test the functionality of a given microRNA at single-cell resolution. In addition, during animal development, many microRNAs are found to be expressed from early embryos throughout adults. While studies by forward genetics based on phenotypic readouts can provide functional and mechanistic characterization of miRNAs whose loss of function mutations are available, it remains challenging to address whether these miRNAs are continuously required during development or if there are specific developmental windows in which these tiny genes play essential roles. Answers to this question not only provide mechanistic insights of how miRNAs act in vivo but also are crucial for us to understand how genetic circuitries involving miRNAs are assembled in space and over time in order to provide highly specific biological outputs. To tackle the question, it would require manipulating miRNA activity with the desired spatial and temporal resolution.

The current paradigm of inhibiting miRNA involves both chemical and genetic approaches. In the former case, metabolically stable nucleotide analogues such as 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides, peptide nucleic acids, morpholinos and locked nucleic acids (LNA) have been developed as antisense reagents against miRNAs. These miRNA antagonists (antagomirs or antimirs) are quite effective in knocking down miRNAs both in vitro and in living organisms including primates.39 Applying antimirs to inhibit miRNAs is limited in its spatial and temporal resolution, so it remains challenging to inactivate a specific microRNA in a selected cell or time. The only current genetic strategies for inactivating a microRNA in a spatially and temporally controlled manner may either utilize Cre/Lox-mediated gene knockout in mice or transgenic expression of so-called miRNA sponges, which reduce miRNA function through competitive interaction with artificial target sites10. Both strategies are labor- and time-intensive and require not only appropriate model systems but also the availability of promoters with desired spatial and temporal resolution.

To gain precise spatial and temporal control of manipulating miRNA activity in vivo, we resort to the technique of photo-activation by exploiting the superb maneuverability and precision of a light beam. Different photonic approaches have been developed for controlling gene expression or the level of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in living model organisms1116, yet no attempt has been reported for regulating miRNA activity in vivo with light. To fill this technology gap, we considered photo-activatable antisense reagents as an efficient and versatile tool for a number of reasons. First, miRNAs are particularly susceptible to inhibition by antisense oligonucleotides3. Second, a number of nucleotide analogues such as 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides, LNA or their phosphorothioate derivatives are known to be stable in vivo to induce highly specific down-regulation of a miRNA through base complementation.39 In addition, the chemistry for preparing these nucleotide analogues is well developed so they are easily accessible. Finally, antisense oligonucleotides are highly charged and hydrophilic molecules so they can not diffuse across hydrophobic cell membranes on their own. Once generated from their photo-caged precursors, they ought to stay in the cells (and their progenies) where photo-activation is executed. This retains the spatial resolution of photoactivation at the cellular level and is advantageous over other methods based on caging hydrophobic ligands or using heat to induce gene expression15,16.

To develop photo-activatable antisense reagents to inhibit miRNA activity in vivo, we considered C. elegans as a particularly suitable model system for testing these caged antimirs (cantimirs) because of its optical transparency, invariant developmental program, ease of reagent delivery and several well-characterized miRNA pathways for the reagent validation17. In particular, we show that cantimirs can be used to effectively inhibit the function of the miRNA lsy-6, which is expressed in a single neuron in C. elegans where it is required for proper neuronal fate specification.

Results and discussion

Since miRNAs of C. elegans can be effectively inhibited by 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides,5 we designed and constructed these cantimirs using two strands of 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides (Figure 1A): one strand is an antisense oligoribonucleotide with sequence complementary to a specific miRNA, and the other is a blocking strand of shorter length complementary to the 3′-terminus of the antisense strand, so the sequence of the blocking strand overlaps with the “seed” sequence of a miRNA - a region of miRNA that has been thought to be important for the target recognition and inhibition2. When the antisense and the blocking strands are covalently connected by a caged linker, the relatively short blocking strand is expected to bind tightly to the complementary antisense strand, thus preventing the antisense oligoribonucleotide from hybridizing with its target.18 Photolysis splits the caged linker, reduces the interaction between the blocking strand and the antisense strand, and makes the antisense oligonucleotide accessible to hybridization with its target miRNA of equal length (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
Design and synthesis of caged antimir (cantimir). (A) Design of cantimir for the light controlled inhibition of microRNA. The black and blue square represents caged coumarin (nonfluorescent) and coumarin, respectively. (B) Structure of a bifunctional ...

To prepare these cantimirs, we first synthesized a bifunctional photo-cleavable coumarin linker that contains an amine reactive NHS ester and a thiol reactive maleimide (Figure 1B and Supplementary Figure 1). The 1-(2-nitrophenyl)ethyl (NPE) caged coumarin exhibits very high uncaging efficiency by either UV light or two photon excitation19,20, thus facilitating photoactivation to minimize photo-toxicity in living cells. To enhance the flexibility and the water solubility of the linker, a triple repeat of oxyethylene was incorporated into the linker. This caged linker was first reacted with a blocking strand of 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotide containing a 5′-amino group. The reaction was carried out at neutral pH only for ~ 30 mins to minimize the degradation of maleimide. HPLC and PAGE analysis of the reaction mixture suggested high conversion of the starting material (Supplementary Figure 2). Since the conjugated product contained a caged coumarin, it displayed intense blue fluorescence on the polyacrylamide gel (PAGE) upon UV illumination. Subsequently we reacted this intermediate with an antisense 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotide (against the miRNA lsy-6) containing a terminal thiol group (Figure 1C). To examine how the length of the blocking strand affects the activity of these cantimirs, we prepared a total of six lsy-6 cantimirs using blocking oligonucleotides varying from a 9-mer (canti_lsy-6_9) to a 14-mer (canti_lsy-6_14). These products were purified by PAGE and HPLC (Supplementary Figure 2) and confirmed by the electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (Figure 2A).

Figure 2
In vitro characterization of lsy-6 cantimirs. (A) Structures and mass analyses of lsy-6 cantimirs containing blocking strands of different lengths. (B) UV-dose dependent photolysis of canti_lsy-6_11 analyzed by the gel shift assay. (C) Time courses of ...

In vitro photolysis by UV light (365 nm) confirmed that these cantimirs were efficiently uncaged to generate two photo-cleaved oligonucleotides: the fluorescent antisense strand (containing coumarin) and the non-fluorescent blocking strand (Figure 2B). Overall the fluorescence intensity of the cantimir increased over 80 times upon exhaustive photolysis (Supplementary Figure 3). Quantification of the time course of photo-conversion gave the uncaging quantum yield (Qu) of 37%, and uncaging cross-section (product of Qu and the extinction coefficient (at 365 nm) of 7,350 M−1 cm−1 (Figure 2C). Thus, these cantimirs, like their parent caged coumarins, manifest very high photolytic efficiency which is ideally suitable for the small animal uncaging applications.21

We had anticipated that the length of the blocking strand had to be optimized in order to make an ideal cantimir: on one hand, a longer blocking strand binds tighter to an antisense strand, thus completely switching “OFF” the antisense activity of a cantimir; on the other, to switch “ON” the antisense activity after photolysis, a shorter blocking strand is preferred because it would dissociate from the antisense oligonucleotide more rapidly. To evaluate the in vivo performance of this series of canti_lsy-6, we injected them into the gonad of a reporter worm strain expressing GFP in the ASER neuron (gcy-5prom::gfp, i.e., the expression of GFP is driven by the promoter of gcy-5 gene which is only expressed in ASER22. The lsy-6 miRNA regulates left-right asymmetry of ASE neurons, a pair of chemosensory neurons that share many bilaterally symmetrical features, yet differ in their ability to discriminate different ions by expressing distinct sets of chemoreceptors of the gcy gene family.23 In wild type animals, lsy-6 miRNA is only present in ASEL (left ASE) and it restricts gcy-5 expression to ASER through repression of the transcription factor cog-1, a direct target of lsy-6.24 By contrast, deletion24 or knockdown5 of lsy-6 induces ectopic gcy-5prom::gfp expression in ASEL, resulting in GFP labeling of both ASEL and ASER (“Lsy phenotype”; Figure 3A, B).

Figure 3
In vivo assay of the background and light-activated antisense activity of lsy-6 cantimirs. (A) lsy-6 mediates inhibition of gcy-5 gene expression in the ASE class of chemosensory neurons19. A simplified version of a more complex gene regulatory network ...

After injecting cantimirs into the gonad of adult worms, we collected labeled early stage embryos and illuminated them with UV light (365 nm). We then assessed adult animals for a Lsy phenotype. Among these cantimirs, only canti_lsy-6_9, the cantimir which cantains a 9-mer blocking strand, showed high background antisense activity even without UV photolysis (Figure 3C), probably because that the 9-mer blocking strand is too short to effectively shield the antisense oligoribonucleotide from hybridizing with lsy-6. Increasing the length of the blocking strand drastically reduced the background activity, yet UV photolysis of canti_lsy-6_10, _11, and _12 turned on their antisense inhibitory activity to knock down lsy-6 effectively. Interestingly, uncaging canti_lsy-6_13 or canti_lsy-6_14 failed to inhibit lsy-6, likely because 13-mer and 14-mer blocking strands remained tightly bound with the antisense oligonucleotide even when they were no longer covalently linked. This was supported by the native gel-shift analysis, which showed that, upon photolysis, the 13-mer and the 14-mer blocking strands, but not 12-mer or shorter ones, remained bound with the antisense oligonucleotide on the native gel (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Stage and cell specific inhibition of lsy-6 in developing C. elegans. (A) Worms (gcy-5::gfp) labeled with canti_lsy-6_11 were photolyzed with UV light (365 nm) at five developmental stages. The lsy-6(lf) phenotype was scored similarly as in Figure 3. ...

Studies using a lsy-6prom::gfp reporter have suggested that lsy-6 expression started at embryonic stage and persisted though larval and adult stages.25 It was unclear, however, whether lsy-6 expression is continuously required throughout development in order to specify the expression of gcy genes in the ASE neurons. To address this question, we photolyzed canti_lsy-6_11 in developing worms at different developmental stages: before the comma stage, during the comma stage (~380 min. of development), 1.5 fold (~420 min.), 2 – 3 fold (~450 min to 520 min.), and larval stage 1 to 4 (L1 to L4). Uncaging the cantimir before the comma stage was highly effective in blocking lsy-6 to induce the ectopic expression of gcy-5::gfp in ASEL. In striking contrast, inhibition of lsy-6 after the comma stage essentially failed to block the conversion of ASEL into ASER (Figure 5A). This result argues that lsy-6 activity prior to the comma stage is essential for regulating the asymmetric expression of gcy genes in adult worms, and it suggests that a transient input from lsy-6 prior to the comma stage is sufficient to produce a stable ASEL fate in adult worms.

A few additional lines of evidence further support that lsy-6 acts during embryonic development and is no longer required later on to specify the asymmetric expression of the gcy chemoreceptors in the ASE neurons. First, a fosmid-based fluorescent reporter for the direct target of lsy-6, the cog-1 homeobox gene26, shows that cog-1 expression is repressed in ASER from the time the reporter initiates expression at about the 2-fold stage (Supplementary Figure 4), suggesting that lsy-6 function is indeed exerted around that time. Second, experiments using a strong temperature sensitive allele of cog-1 revealed that cog-1 function is necessary only around the comma stage, but at no later stage, coincident with the birth of the ASE neurons or shortly after.27 These data are consistent with the results obtained with the lsy-6 cantimir, arguing that the expression pattern and timing of activity of cog-1 are consistent with a critical role for lsy-6 around the comma stage.

In addition to the temporal feature of miRNA action, the cellular or subcellular distribution of miRNAs represents another level of complexity in their regulation and function. To test the spatial selectivity of applying these cantimirs to block miRNAs in cells of interest, we locally photolyzed canti_lsy-6_11 in a blastomere, ABa or ABp, of a 4-cell stage embryo. ABa and ABp are the precursors of ASEL and ASER neurons, respectively27. Since uncaging canti_lsy-6_11 in ABa or ABp was expected to inhibit lsy-6 only in their corresponding daughter cells, and because lsy-6 functions by inhibiting gcy-5 expression in ASEL, blocking lsy-6 in ABa, but not in ABp, would affect the expression of gcy-5. Indeed, local uncaging with a narrow beam of light in ABa caused ectopic expression of gcy-5::gfp in ASEL, while local uncaging in ABp had no effect (Figure 5B). Thus, these cantimirs are capable of blocking miRNAs in both stage and cell specific manners.

In summary, we have developed a new class of caged antimirs with high uncaging efficiency for regulating miRNAs in vivo. Initial applications of a cantimir against the lsy-6 miRNA revealed that a transient lsy-6 activity around the comma stage is sufficient for specifying the fate of ASE neurons later on. The modular design and facile assembly (Figure 1C) of these cantimirs also offers an ideal template for constructing photo-activatable antisense oligonucleotides against numerous miRNAs or perhaps even other types of non-coding RNAs. Combined with the uncaging techniques of high three dimensional selectivity (two photon excitation for example) and appropriate cellular delivery methods, these cantimirs should offer us new approaches to perform functional analysis of miRNAs with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution in living cells and in different biological systems.

METHODS

Photo-activation of cantimir and light-controlled silencing of lsy-6 in C. elegans

Purified cantimirs (20 μM) were injected into both gonads of young adult transgenic hermaphrodites expressing GFP in the ASER neuron (gcy-5prom::gfp, strain OH 3192). Rhodamine dextran (40 KD, 8 mg/mL final concentration) was included in the injection solution as a marker. To minimize photolysis of cantimirs during injection, a longpass filter was placed in the excitation light path of the inverted microscope to prevent the sample from exposing to light shorter than 410 nm. For each experiment, we routinely injected a cantimir into ~ twenty worms. About 16 h post-injection, we collected rhodamine labeled embryos laid from injected worms under a fluorescence dissection scope (SteREO Discovery V12, CarlZeiss, Göttingen, Germany). These embryos were then separated into different groups based on the stages of development. Grouped embryos or larvae were photolyzed with UV light (365 nm) from a mercury lamp (B-100AP, UVP) for a total of 60 sec (12 sec × 5, spaced 10 sec apart). The lsy-6(lf) phenotype was scored when these worms reached adults. UV light illumination itself had no effect on gcy-5prom::gfp expression, neither did it have any observable effect on animal development or behavior.

To selectively activate a cantimir in a blastomere, after worm injection, we cut injected worms to collect 2-cell stage labeled embryos. The embryos were quickly mounted on 2% agar pad. We then performed local uncaging in ABa or ABp cell when the embryo developed to the 4-cell stage, using a field diaphragm to limit the size of the uncaging beam and following the same protocol as previously described 21. The UV illuminated (360 ± 20 nm, 5 sec) embryos were then recovered from the agar pad, transferred to an agar dish, and allowed to develop in the dark until lsy-6(lf) phenotype was scored at the adult stage.

Supplementary Material

Supplement

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial supports from the National Institute of Health and the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

Footnotes

Supporting Information.

Supplementary Figures 1 – 4, synthesis and in vitro characterization of cantimirs and expression of cog-1.

References

1. Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004;431:350–5. [PubMed]
2. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136:215–33. [PubMed]
3. Esau CC. Inhibition of microRNA with antisense oligonucleotides. Methods. 2008;44:55–60. [PubMed]
4. Hutvagner G, Simard MJ, Mello CC, Zamore PD. Sequence-specific inhibition of small RNA function. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:465–73.
5. Zheng G, Ambros V, Li WH. Inhibiting miRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans using a potent and selective antisense reagent. Silence. 2010;1:9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Elmen J, et al. LNA-mediated microRNA silencing in non-human primates. Nature. 2008;452:896–9. [PubMed]
7. Obad S, et al. Silencing of microRNA families by seed-targeting tiny LNAs. Nat Genet. 2011;43:371–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Flynt AS, Li N, Thatcher EJ, Solnica-Krezel L, Patton JG. Zebrafish miR-214 modulates Hedgehog signaling to specify muscle cell fate. Nat Genet. 2007;39:259–63. [PubMed]
9. Fabani MM, et al. Efficient inhibition of miR-155 function in vivo by peptide nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Ebert MS, Neilson JR, Sharp PA. MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat Methods. 2007;4:721–6. [PubMed]
11. Ando H, Furuta T, Tsien RY, Okamoto H. Photo-mediated gene activation using caged RNA/DNA in zebrafish embryos. Nature Genetics. 2001;28:317–325. [PubMed]
12. Tang X, Maegawa S, Weinberg ES, Dmochowski IJ. Regulating gene expression in zebrafish embryos using light-activated, negatively charged Peptide nucleic acids. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11000–1. [PubMed]
13. Shestopalov IA, Sinha S, Chen JK. Light-controlled gene silencing in zebrafish embryos. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:650–1. [PubMed]
14. Deiters A, et al. Photocaged morpholino oligomers for the light-regulation of gene function in zebrafish and Xenopus embryos. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:15644–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Cambridge SB, et al. Doxycycline-dependent photoactivated gene expression in eukaryotic systems. Nat Methods. 2009;6:527–31. [PubMed]
16. Kamei Y, et al. Infrared laser-mediated gene induction in targeted single cells in vivo. Nat Methods. 2009;6:79–81. [PubMed]
17. Kaufman EJ, Miska EA. The microRNAs of Caenorhabditis elegans. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:728–37. [PubMed]
18. Ordoukhanian P, Taylor JS. Design and Synthesis of a Versatile Photocleavable DNA Building-Block - Application to Phototriggered Hybridization. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117:9570–9571.
19. Zhao Y, et al. New caged coumarin fluorophores with extraordinary uncaging cross sections suitable for biological imaging applications. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4653–63. [PubMed]
20. Dakin K, Li WH. Infrared-LAMP: two-photon uncaging and imaging of gap junctional communication in three dimensions. Nat Methods. 2006;3:959. [PubMed]
21. Guo YM, et al. Imaging dynamic cell-cell junctional coupling in vivo using Trojan-LAMP. Nat Methods. 2008;5:835–41. [PubMed]
22. Yu S, Avery L, Baude E, Garbers DL. Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: a new family of chemosensory receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3384–7. [PubMed]
23. Hobert O. Architecture of a microRNA-controlled gene regulatory network that diversifies neuronal cell fates. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:181–8. [PubMed]
24. Johnston RJ, Hobert O. A microRNA controlling left/right neuronal asymmetry in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003;426:845–9. [PubMed]
25. Johnston RJ, Jr, Chang S, Etchberger JF, Ortiz CO, Hobert O. MicroRNAs acting in a double-negative feedback loop to control a neuronal cell fate decision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12449–54. [PubMed]
26. Didiano D, Cochella L, Tursun B, Hobert O. Neuron-type specific regulation of a 3′UTR through redundant and combinatorially acting cis-regulatory elements. RNA. 2010;16:349–63. [PubMed]
27. Sarin S, et al. Genetic screens for Caenorhabditis elegans mutants defective in left/right asymmetric neuronal fate specification. Genetics. 2007;176:2109–30. [PubMed]