|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Schistosomiasis is a major public health problem in 76 countries where it afflicts more than 200 million people . Schistosomes exhibit a complicated life cycle including two free-living stages in water and parasitic stages in the intermediate snail host and definitive vertebrate host . A large number of expressed mRNAs, genes and proteins have recently been identified or predicted in schistosomes from cDNA, genomic, and proteomic analyses [3–5]. However, in most cases, few functional details are available regarding these genes or proteins due to the lack of comprehensive molecular tools for schistosomes to elucidate their roles in vivo[6–8]. Some progress has been made toward the development and use of RNA interference methods, transfection methods, expression and integration of DNA constructs, and gene reporters [9–28]. There is a great need for further development and comparison of reporter genes and transfection protocols for different schistosome stages to provide researchers with a resource for choosing the most effective and appropriate tools for a particular experimental paradigm. In the present study, we evaluated the use of Gaussia luciferase as a reporter for use in schistosomes. In addition, we evaluated a variety of electroporation and biolistic transfection protocols to compare the effectiveness of these transfection protocols in different schistosome stages.
Gaussia luciferase is a new reporter luciferase from the marine copepod Gaussia princeps[29, 30]. This 185 amino acid (19.9 kDa) monomeric luciferase does not require any cofactors (e.g., ATP) and catalyzes the oxidation of the substrate coelenterazine in a reaction that emits light (480 nm) similar to Renilla luciferase. The reporter can be used in a Dual-Luciferase Assay with Photinus (Firefly) luciferase, enabling the use of a control luciferase reporter in experimental paradigms . This new luciferase has several major advantages over previous luciferases (Firefly or Renilla): 1) human codon-optimized Gaussia Luciferase generates at least 100-fold higher bioluminescent signal intensity in mammalian cells, compared to Firefly and Renilla luciferases; 2) Gaussia luciferase possesses a natural secretory signal consisting of 16 amino acids, is secreted into the media, and thus expression can be evaluated without lysis of the cells or organisms; and 3) Gaussia luciferase coding region is 555 nt, the smallest luciferase reporter.
To evaluate Gaussia luciferase as a potential reporter for schistosomes, we transfected Firefly, Renilla, and Gaussia luciferase RNA into different schistosome stages and compared the level of luciferase activity observed in schistosome lysates. RNA reporters instead of DNA reporters were used to enable direct comparison of reporter activity and transfection efficiency independent of potential differences in promoter activity or RNA processing that could occur in different cells and stages. As illustrated in Figure 1, Gaussia luciferase led to much higher levels of luciferase activity than either the Firefly or Renilla luciferase reporter in all schistosome stages examined (some data not shown). We next analyzed the time course of Renilla and Gaussia luciferase activity in sporocysts (Figure 2A & B). Gaussia luciferase activity peaked rapidly within 3 hours, began to fall ~ 12 hours post-transfection, and was gone by 30 hrs. Renilla luciferase also peaked rapidly at 3 hrs, began to fall after ~ 12 hour post-transfection, but significant levels of luciferase remained after 48 hrs. Thus, Gaussia luciferase protein appears to have a significantly shorter half-life than Renilla. We estimate that Gaussia protein half-life in worms is ~ 9 hours. Similar data were observed in schistosomula (data not shown).
A unique attribute of Gaussia luciferase is the presence of a native secretory signal. To examine the secretion of Gaussia luciferase in schistosomes, we transfected a Gaussia RNA reporter into sporocycts and measured levels of luciferase activity in both parasite lysates and the culture media over time. As illustrated in Figure 2E, secretion of Gaussia luciferase increased in a linear fashion up to ~ 9 hr, was relatively stable in the media to ~22 hr, decayed relatively rapidly after 22 hr, and was gone by 30 hrs. Maximal Gaussia luciferase activity was ~ 1/3 greater in sporocyst media than in lysates. The time course of Gaussia secretion in schistosomula was similar to that observed in sporocysts (Figure 2C & D).
During the course of these studies we also compared levels of luciferase expression using available biolistic or electroporation RNA transfection methods in different schistosome stages (see Table 1). Notably, RNA electroporation of miracidia and adults under a variety of conditions was never successful. Whether this represents the presence of multiple membranes in miracidia that limit efficient transfection or degradation of the RNA at the schistosome surface remains to be determined. In contrast, biolistic introduction of nucleic acids into miracidia and adults is readily achieved (Figure 1A). However, we have not observed significant secretion of Gaussia luciferase following biolistic transfection of RNA into adults (Figure 2F). One possible interpretation of these results is that the prevailing biolistic conditions (1550 psi) might deliver the gold particles carrying the nucleic acid to a depth within the worms that cannot lead to secretion. However, we have observed gold particles in the tegument and GFP expression has been observed in the adult tegument using biolistics and an actin promoter . Thus, it seems more likely that the adult tegumental syncitium might either degrade the Gaussia reporter protein during secretion or its structure limits secretion. Comparison of levels of luciferase expression observed in either sporocysts or schistosomula following RNA transfection using biolistics or electroporation demonstrated that electroporation leads to much higher levels of luciferase activity (Figure 1). Preliminary data suggest that this is also true for DNA transfection and that parameters in Table 1 can also be used for DNA transfection (data not shown). Overall, current methods for delivery and analysis of protein normalized luciferase reporter expression are most efficient in sporocysts and schistosomula. From these data, we suggest that additional development and analysis of vectors and expression elements for DNA transfection might be most readily achieved through electroporation of either sporocysts or schistosomula.
To date, fluorescent or luciferase reporters have been tested and used in schistosomes [10, 13, 16, 19, 21–24, 27, 31]. Each of these reporters has its advantages. Fluorescent reporters provide a non-invasive and extremely useful method for evaluating the localization of expression. Furthermore, a variety of differently colored fluorescent reporters are currently available. A potential limitation of these reporters is the level of expression observed. Analysis of several different fluorescent reporters we have examined (data not shown) indicates only a small percentage of the parasites exhibit expression requiring considerable time and effort to identify and to evaluate expression of the reporter in parasites. In addition, while fluorescence can be quantitated, its measurement is more complex than luciferase measurement in a luminometer. Luciferase reporters are not typically used as imaging reporters. However, they can be used as imaging reporters and Gaussia’s output compared to Renilla is ~ 200-fold better. An advantage of luciferase reporters is their high sensitivity and ease with which quantitative data can be obtained. As shown here, electroporation of a Gaussia reporter RNA into sporocysts and schistosomula leads to the expression of high levels of luciferase activity. Gaussia luciferase is not only more robust than other luciferases examined, but has the advantage of being secreted in several stages enabling its level of activity to be measured non-invasively in the media. This offers a variety of advantages for experimental paradigms, particularly if the amount of secretion is high. In our experiments, we have easily measured luciferase activity in 20 μl of the media which corresponds to ~200,000 relative light units/sec. The media can be concentrated to increase the sensitivity of the assay. As Gaussia is secreted from the parasites, this property might enable the identification of 1) snails infected with sporocysts expressing recombinant DNA, 2) parasites expressing Gaussia luciferase following limiting dilution in culture, or 3) possibly the expression of luciferase from schistosomes in vivo in the definitive host. For example, as DNA transfection and integration technologies are further developed, it may be possible to monitor expression of Gaussia DNA constructs driven by different promoters and secretory signals in adults and during schistosome development in mice through analysis of secreted luciferase in samples of blood drawn from infected hosts. Secretion of Gaussia luciferase might also offer a new tool for evaluation of transcriptional regulation associated with signaling pathways. Thus, the influence of host ligands on transcription of schistosome genes could be examined using Gaussia reporter DNAs driven by selected promoters in developing schistosomes in culture. Following DNA transfection, the role of various ligands in modulating transcription could be measured over time in culture media. Furthermore, the relatively short half-life of Gaussia protein might enable experimental approaches where the culture media is changed, the worms washed, and new ligands added to evaluate their role on transcriptional regulation of particular genes. Finally, Gaussia has recently been adapted for use in protein-fragment complementation assays (PCAs) to study the dynamics of protein-protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. Using this strategy, a variety of potential applications might be devised to study protein interactions using PCA that could be implemented by schistosome researchers simply using RNA transfection .
In the current experiments, we have used a human codon-optimized form of the Gaussia coding region. It remains to be determined whether native Gaussia codons would lead to higher levels of Gaussia expression in schistosomes as human codon-optimized open reading frames may not be optimal for invertebrate expression. Substitution of a native, schistosome secretory signal might improve secretion and be necessary for adults. In addition, a polyclonal antibody against Gaussia luciferase is available commercially as an additional tool for Gaussia reporter studies (NanoLight Technology, Pinetop, AZ). Furthermore, a second secreted copepod luciferase (Metridia) was recently made commercially available (Ready-To-Glow™ Secreted Luciferase System, Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Gaussia can be used in co-transfection experiments with Firefly luciferase for transfection and data normalization within parasite lysates (data not shown). Finally, promoterless vectors and non-secreted forms of Gaussia are also commercially available (Targeting Systems, Santee, CA).
In summary, we have demonstrated that Gaussia luciferase is a robust and secreted luciferase reporter that may enable a variety of experimental approaches in schistosomes. The data illustrate that 1) Gaussia is the most robust luciferase reporter for all stages examined, 2) biolistics can be used to introduce RNA into miracidia and adults where electroporation is not effective, and 3) electroporation of luciferase reporters into sporocysts and schistosomula leads to the highest levels of luciferase activity. These data should facilitate additional studies and provide a framework for further development of DNA transfection technologies in schistosomes.
This work was supported by a grant from the Ellison Medical Foundation (ID-IA-0037-02) and a grant from the NIH (AI49558). Schistosome-infected hamsters and snails were kindly supplied by the NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center at the Biomedical Research Institute through NIAID contract N01-AI-30026.