Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Am J Prev Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 June 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3631560

Mental Illness and Use of Screening Mammography Among Medicaid Beneficiaries

Siran M. Koroukian, PhD, Paul M. Bakaki, MD, MS, Negar Golchin, PharmD, RPh, MPH, Carl Tyler, MD, MS, and Sana Loue, JD, PhD, MPH, MSSA



Disparities in receipt of preventive services by people with mental illness have been previously documented. However, whether these disparities extend to screening mammography among individuals experiencing comparable barriers to accessing care has not been fully examined.


To determine whether disparities exist in receipt of screening mammography between women with and without mental illness enrolled in Medicaid, a program with documented potential to reduce healthcare disparities.


Receipt of screening mammography was examined among women aged 50–64 years enrolled in Ohio’s Medicaid program during the years 2002–2008 (n=130,088). Receipt of annual screening mammography was examined among those with at least one screening mammography during the study period. Mental illness was identified through diagnostic, service, and pharmacotherapy codes (n=61,661).


Compared to women without mental illness, more women with mental illness received at least one screening mammography during the study period (38.1% vs 31.7%, p<0.001). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, including the presence of comorbid conditions and length of enrollment in Medicaid, women with mental illness were 32% less likely to undergo at least one screening mammography (AOR 0.68, 95% CI= 0.66, 0.70). Among those who received at least one screening mammography, fewer women with mental illness received screening mammography on an annual basis (5.9% vs 12.7%, p< 0.001; AOR 0.53 (95% CI= 0.49, 0.56)). For all beneficiaries, each year of enrollment in Medicaid increased the likelihood of screening mammography use by at least 50%.


Medicaid beneficiaries with mental illness constitute a particularly vulnerable population for suboptimal breast cancer screening.

Individuals with mental illness suffer premature mortality and excess morbidity.110 Disparities in health services provided to people with mental illness have been documented for preventive services.11, 12 Whether these disparities extend to breast cancer screening is not clear. In one study of a privately insured population, women with mental illness and/or substance abuse, regardless of severity, were at risk for underscreening.13 However, because of the effects of mental illness on economic self-sufficiency, many mental illness patients are insured through Medicaid – a program with “equalizing impact”14 (i.e., the potential to attenuate disparities).

This study aims to determine whether, among Medicaid beneficiaries, disparities exist in the receipt of screening mammography between women with and without mental illness. Limiting our study to Medicaid beneficiaries ensures a comparison of utilization measures across subgroups of a population with comparable income and barriers to accessing care.


Data Sources

The Ohio Medicaid enrollment and claims files for the years 2002–2008 were used. The study population was identified from the enrollment file, and screening mammography was identified from claims data by using diagnosis and procedure codes.

This study was approved by the Case Western Reserve University Cancer IRB, as well as the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, which administers the Medicaid program.

Study Population

The study population included all women aged 50–64 years, and enrolled in fee-for-service Medicaid during 2002–2008 (n = 144,497).

As this study is part of a larger project on breast cancer prevention and control in Medicaid beneficiaries with and without mental illness, Medicaid beneficiaries who were diagnosed with breast cancer in the 1996–2005 period were identified and excluded from this study (3744). Thus, in addition to focusing our search to procedure codes specific to screening mammography listed below, excluding women diagnosed with breast cancer in the aforementioned period provided an additional safeguard against misclassifying diagnostic or surveillance mammography as a screening mammography. Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (10,665; based on codes listed in Appendix A, available online at were also excluded, leaving the study population at 130,088.

Variables of interest

The outcome variable, screening mammography, was identified using the Common Procedural Terminology, 4th Edition code 76092; the HealthCare Common Procedural Coding System codes G0202 and G0203; and the ICD-9-CM codes V76.10, V76.11, V76.12, and V76.19.

Greater screening mammography uptake among longer-term enrollees has been previously documented.15 Since Medicaid beneficiaries with chronic medical illnesses and/or with mental illness tend to be enrolled in Medicaid for extended periods of time, length of enrollment was accounted for in the multivariable analysis.

Receipt of screening mammography was analyzed as follows: (1) at least once during the study period, and (2) annually, consistent with recommendations by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Cancer Society.16 Annual screening mammography was computed by dividing the observed number of mammograms at least 6 months apart by the expected number of mammograms during the length of enrollment in Medicaid during the study period. In contrast to some studies, the current analysis was limited to annual screening mammography to women who received at least one screening mammography during the study period.

The main independent variable, mental illness, was identified based on the following indicators: (1): presence of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for mental illness and/or alcohol/substance abuse; (2) receipt of mental health services; and (3) prescriptions pertaining to psychiatric conditions. Mental illness was defined by the presence of a diagnosis of mental illness AND EITHER receipt of mental health services OR prescription drugs for psychiatric conditions. To identify women with more serious mental illness, if mental health services were from a psychologist, the algorithm required that there be at least one visit to a psychiatrist, OR at least one psychoactive medication prescription.

Demographic variables included age (50–54 years, 55–59 years, 60–64 years); and race (African- American [regardless of Hispanic ethnicity], and All Others). County of residence (Appalachian, metro, rural, suburban, and unknown) was based on when a beneficiary first Medicaid enrollment span during the study period. Medical comorbidities (0/1) were identified by using all claims data, and according to Elixhauser’s classification17. Last, the length of enrollment in Medicaid during the study period15 was measured in years.


Following descriptive analysis, multivariable logistic regression analysis on screening mammography was conducted to evaluate the association between mental illness and screening mammography after adjusting for potential confounders. As noted above, analysis was condicted of (1) receipt of at least one screening mammography during the study period, and (2) receipt of annual screening mammography among those who received at least one screening mammography during the study period (n=45,197). Since length of enrollment was used to define annual screening mammography, it was not included in the second multivariable model. SAS version 9.2 was used in all of current analyses.


Table 1 summarizes relevant demographic and health characteristics of the study population, stratified by mental illness. Just under half of the study population was identified with mental illness. Compared to those without mental illness, women with mental illness were more likely to be non–African-American, reside in an Appalachian county, bear medical comorbidities, and be enrolled in Medicaid for longer periods.

Table 1
Demographic distribution of the study population, by the variables of interest, n (%)

The unadjusted proportion of women with and without mental illness receiving at least one screening mammography during the study period was 38.1% and 31.7%, respectively (Table 2). However, after adjusting for potential confounders, and especially for comorbid conditions and length of enrollment in Medicaid, the multivariable logistic regression model indicated a negative association between mental illness and receipt of screening mammography (AOR: 0.68, 95% CI=0.66, 0.70). Each year of enrollment in Medicaid was associated with 51% greater likelihood of receiving screening mammography (AOR: 1.51, 95% CI=1.50, 1.52); data not shown). Among recipients with at least one screening mammography, mental illness was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of receiving annual screening mammography (AOR: 0.53 [95% CI=0.49, 0.56]).

Table 2
Unadjusted and adjusted association between mental illness and receipt of screening mammography


Medicaid beneficiaries with mental illness experience significant disadvantage in breast cancer screening, whether measured by receipt of at least one screening mammography or by the recommended frequency of annual screening. As a comparison, the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) documented that nearly 72% of women in the group aged 50–64 years received a mammogram in the prior 2 years.18 Based on the findings from the present study and that of the aforementioned NHIS study, it was estimated that if women with mental illness were to undergo screening mammography at rates similar to the general population, 350,000 to 650,000 additional women nationwide would undergo screening mammography (Appendix C, available online at

The strengths of this study lie in the use of several years of statewide Medicaid data, as well as in the use of a multipronged approach to identifying mental illness, which may have reduced misclassification. This algorithm would exclude people with mental illness who are not receiving treatment, and in whom mammography rates may be even poorer than those reported in our index population.

Limitations include the possibility of incomplete claims data. Although managed care enrollees were excluded from our study population, the dually Medicare–Medicaid enrolled, those on “spend-down,” as well as nursing home residents are represented in the study. However, a sensitivity analysis accounting for all these factors did not yield any notably different results.


In conclusion, women with mental illness are at a high risk for suboptimal breast cancer screening. While increased length of Medicaid enrollment improved uptake of screening mammography, further understanding of the barriers to and facilitators of optimal screening is necessary to improve cancer control in this population.

Supplementary Material


The authors thank Mr. James Gearheart of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, which administers the Ohio Medicaid program, for his careful review of earlier drafts of the manuscript.

National Cancer Institute (R03 CA 134195, to Dr. Koroukian)

SMK is also supported by the Case Western Reserve University/Cleveland Clinic CTSA Grant Number UL1 RR024989 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH and NIH roadmap for Medical Research.

CT was partially supported by Award Number R25CA11898 from the National Cancer Institute.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the 0NCRR.


The results were presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Preventive Oncology, Las Vegas, Nevada, March 2011.

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.


1. Bushe CJ, Taylor M, Haukka J. Mortality in schizophrenia: a measurable clinical endpoint. J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Nov;24(4 Suppl):17–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Tran E, Rouillon F, Loze JY, et al. Cancer mortality in patients with schizophrenia: an 11-year prospective cohort study. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3555–3562. [PubMed]
3. Lawrence D, Kisely S, Pais J. The epidemiology of excess mortality in people with mental illness. Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;55(12):752–760. [PubMed]
4. Kisely S, Smith M, Lawrence D, Maaten S. Mortality in individuals who have had psychiatric treatment: population-based study in Nova Scotia. Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;187:552–558. [PubMed]
5. Saha S, Chant D, McGrath J. A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: is the differential mortality gap worsening over time? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1123–1131. [PubMed]
6. Chang CK, Hayes RD, Broadbent M, et al. All-cause mortality among people with serious mental illness (SMI), substance use disorders, and depressive disorders in southeast London: a cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10:77. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Auquier P, Lancon C, Rouillon F, Lader M, Holmes C. Mortality in schizophrenia. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Dec;15(12):873–879. [PubMed]
8. Hennekens CH, Hennekens AR, Hollar D, Casey DE. Schizophrenia and increased risks of cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2005 Dec;150(6):1115–1121. [PubMed]
9. De Hert M, Dekker JM, Wood D, Kahl KG, Holt RI, Moller HJ. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people with severe mental illness position statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(6):412–424. [PubMed]
10. Van Gaal LF. Long-term health considerations in schizophrenia: metabolic effects and the role of abdominal adiposity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Sep;16(Suppl 3):S142–148. [PubMed]
11. Druss BG, Rosenheck RA, Desai MM, Perlin JB. Quality of preventive medical care for patients with mental disorders. Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):129–136. [PubMed]
12. Lord O, Malone D, Mitchell AJ. Receipt of preventive medical care and medical screening for patients with mental illness: a comparative analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):519–543. [PubMed]
13. Carney CP, Jones LE. The influence of type and severity of mental illness on receipt of screening mammography. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1097–1104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Currie J, Gruber J. Public health insurance and medical treatment: the equalizing impact of the Medicaid expansion. J Public Economics. 2001;82(1):63–69.
15. Koroukian SM. Screening mammography was used more, and more frequently, by longer than shorter term Medicaid enrollees. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):824–831. [PubMed]
16. Hirsch BR, Lyman GH. Breast cancer screening with mammography. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011 Feb;13(1):63–70. [PubMed]
17. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8–27. [PubMed]
18. Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the U.S.: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010 Jul 1; [PMC free article] [PubMed]