|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) mediates the transport of glucose across the cellular membrane. Its elevated levels and/or activation have been shown to be associated with malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate GLUT-1 expression in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Tissue microarray-based samples of 178 neuroendocrine carcinomas, including 48 typical carcinoids, 31 atypical carcinoids, 27 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and 72 small cell carcinomas from different patients, were studied immunohistochemically for GLUT-1 expression. Forty-seven percent (75/161) of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas were immunoreactive with GLUT-1. GLUT-1 was observed in 7% (3/46) of typical carcinoid, 21% (6/29) of atypical carcinoid, 74% (17/23) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and 78% (49/63) of small cell carcinoma. GLUT-1 expression correlated with increasing patient age (P = 0.01) and with neuroendocrine differentiation/tumor type (P < 0.001), but not with gender, tumor size or stage. GLUT-1 expression was seen in a characteristic membranous pattern of staining along the luminal borders or adjacent to necrotic areas. GLUT-1 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for neuroendocrine carcinomas as a group (risk ratio = 2.519; 95% confidence interval = 1.519–4.178; P < 0.001) and carcinoids (risk ratio = 4.262; 95% confidence interval = 1.472–12.343; P = 0.01). In conclusion, GLUT-1 is expressed in approximately half of the pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas and shows a strong correlation with neuroendocrine differentiation/grade, but not with other clinicopathologic variables. Further studies appear plausible to elucidate the prognostic significance of GLUT-1 expression in pulmonary carcinoids.
Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung are a distinct subset of pulmonary neoplasms that share common neuroendocrine morphology and immunohistochemical characteristics. They consist of typical carcinoids, atypical carcinoids, large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and small cell carcinomas. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are categorized based on the mitotic rate, presence or absence of necrosis, cell size and nuclear features.1 They vary significantly in outcome, as small cell carcinoma has a median survival time of 2–4 months without treatment, whereas typical carcinoid rarely metastasizes and has an excellent prognosis.1,2
It is well recognized that malignant cells have accelerated metabolism, high glucose requirement and increased glucose uptake compared with healthy cells. Transmembrane passage of glucose mediated by specific transporters is considered to be one of the most important mechanisms for enhancing glucose influx into cells. Facilitative glucose transporters (GLUTs) allow the energy-independent transport of glucose across the hydrophobic cell membrane, down its concentration gradient.3 They are known as Na+-independent glucose transporters and they are activated by hypoxia, growth factors, calcium, thyroid hormone, oncogenic transformation and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation.4 Fourteen members of the mammalian facilitative glucose transporter family have been identified: GLUT-1–12, -14 and the H+/myo-inositol transporter. GLUT-1 can be identified only in a limited number of normal tissues, including erythrocytes, germinal cells of the testis, renal tubules, perineurium of peripheral nerves, endothelial cells in blood–brain barrier vessels and placenta (trophoblasts and capillaries).3,5,6 In contrast, elevated levels of GLUT-1 expression and/or activation have been shown to be associated with a variety of carcinomas such as those of the breast, head and neck, bladder, colorectal and lung.3,7–13 Overexpression of GLUT is commonly observed in cancer, which is associated with high metabolism and rapid cell growth in often hypoxic tumor regions.14 Although most of the GLUT subtypes have been detected in different human cancers, GLUT-1 is the only subtype that has been shown to be overexpressed in nearly all human carcinomas.6 In a recent study, it was shown that GLUT-1 is a major glucose transporter expressed in non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and the contribution of the other transporters such as GLUT-2, GLUT-3, GLUT-4 and GLUT-5 to the overall glucose metabolism in non-small-cell lung carcinomas appears to be minor.15 As only limited studies address the issue of GLUT-1 expression in lung carcinoma, we sought to investigate its expression and correlation with outcome in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas from the registry of the Department of Pulmonary and Mediastinal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, served as the basis for this study. Following institutional review board approval, the clinical and follow-up information and tissue material were collected and the tissue microarray was constructed as described earlier.16 The study cohort included 73 men and 83 women with a mean age of 59±15 years (range, 19–83; median 62 years). Follow-up information was available for 122 cases with a median follow-up of 2 years. After identifying tumor area for each case from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, 0.6-mm cores were punched and embedded in the donor paraffin block. The tissue microarray block included 48 typical carcinoids, 31 atypical carcinoids, 27 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 72 small cell carcinomas and 40 normal cores of lung parenchyma in duplicates. The core dropout rate was 10%. An initial GLUT-1 antibody testing was carried out on a set of tumor cell lines and a set of surgical specimens of human placenta, pulmonary non-small-cell carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas. The antibody showed diffuse staining with a breast carcinoma cell line, and a distinct membranous staining with placental cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast cells, erythrocytes, pulmonary adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma but not with endothelial cells, respiratory epithelium, or connective tissue fibroblasts. After achieving satisfactory staining on the surgical specimens, the immunohistochemical studies were carried out on the tissue microarray section of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Four-micron sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded alcohols. This was followed by antigen retrieval in 0.01M EDTA solution for 20 min at 100°C. The slides were allowed to cool for 20 min. After washing in PBS, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, followed by incubation with PBS containing 10% normal goat serum for 30 min. The slides were then treated with polyclonal anti-GLUT-1 antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) at a 1:300 dilution overnight in a humidified chamber. Slides were rinsed with distilled water to remove the primary antibody. The secondary antibody was applied for 30 min. Immunoreactions were detected by the labeled streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex technique and visualized using diaminobenzidine substrate for 10 min, and counterstained with hematoxylin for cellular localization for 2 min. Microscopic analysis of immunohistochemical study was performed under ×400 magnification independently by three pulmonary pathologists. In the case of discrepant results, consensus was achieved with a second review. The intensity and the percentage of the stained tumor cells were evaluated. Only a distinct membranous staining was recorded. The intensity of GLUT-1 expression by the tumor cells was based upon comparison with the intensity of staining of the red blood cells in adjacent blood vessels. GLUT-1 red blood cell expression was assigned an intensity value of 2. Tumor cells with no staining were considered negative, whereas the tumor cells that stained lighter than red blood cells were assigned a value of 1. The tumor cells with equal or greater stain intensity were assigned values of 2 and 3, respectively. The mean overall score comprised the intensity score multiplied by the percent of positive tumor cells. This overall score was then averaged according to the number of available cores. If there was no tumor in a particular core, no score was given. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Software Package for the Social Sciences, version 13.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Correlation of GLUT-1 expression with clinicopathological variables was performed by χ2 methods. Parametric tests were used to assess variables such as stage. One-way analysis of variance was used to test for differences among two or more independent groups and Kruskal–Wallis test was used for comparison of numerical data as appropriate. Kaplan–Meier plots and the log-rank test were used to investigate a potential relationship between GLUT-1 expression and patient survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential prognostic factors were carried out by employing Cox proportional hazards modeling. A result was considered significant if the P-value was < 0.05.
Forty-seven percent (75/161) of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas were immunoreactive with GLUT-1. A distinct membranous staining was found in 7% (3/46) of cases of typical carcinoid, 21% (6/29) of cases of atypical carcinoid, 74% (17/23) of cases of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and 78% (49/63) of cases of small cell carcinoma. GLUT-1 expression was observed in neoplastic cells, preferentially along the luminal border of tumor islands or areas adjacent to necrosis (Figure 1). As expected, the background erythrocytes were positive for GLUT-1 in all the cases, whereas normal bronchial epithelium (4 cases), alveolar pneumocytes (40 cases), smooth muscle cells (2 cases), endothelial cells (40 cases) and connective tissue fibroblasts (10 cases) were negative. GLUT-1 expression positively correlated with tumor differentiation/tumor grade (P < 0.001), and with increasing age (P = 0.01) but not with gender, tumor size or stage (Table 1).
Univariate analysis of the prognostic significance of GLUT-1 showed that its expression was significantly associated with an elevated risk of death for neuroendocrine carcinomas as a group (risk ratio = 2.519; 95% confidence interval = 1.519–4.178; P < 0.001) and carcinoids (risk ratio = 4.262; 95% confidence interval = 1.472–12.343; P = 0.01). No prognostic correlations were observed when different levels of GLUT-1 expression or combined score were included in analysis. Survival curves generated by the Kaplan–Meier method also showed a statistically significant separation of GLUT-1-positive vs GLUT-1-negative cases for all neuroendocrine carcinomas (P < 0.001) and carcinoids (P = 0.01) (Figure 2), but not for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (P = 0.09). The curve separation was also seen for stage I–II (P < 0.001) but not for stage III–IV (P = 0.4) neuroendocrine carcinomas. In multivariate analysis, the patients’ age (<62 years) (risk ratio = 2.693; 95% confidence interval = 1.207–6.009; P = 0.02), tumor differentiation/grade (risk ratio = 2.144; 95% confidence interval = 1.367–3.362; P = 0.001) and higher stage (risk ratio = 3.000; 95% confidence interval = 2.027–4.441; P < 0.001) were independent adverse prognostic factors, but not GLUT expression (risk ratio = 0.536; 95% confidence interval = 0.179–1.608; P = 0.27).
GLUT-1 expression has been evaluated in varying carcinomas from different sites;7,8,11,17–20 however, little is known about its expression in neuroendocrine tumors. Ito et al21 studied the expression of GLUT isoforms in a range of pulmonary carcinomas and noted the presence of GLUT-1 in 7 of 11 small cell carcinomas.21 This was also confirmed by the detection of mRNA in a single case of small cell carcinoma and in a set of small cell carcinoma cell lines.21,22 Our study provides further evidence of frequent GLUT-1 expression in pulmonary small cell carcinoma (78%) on a large number of cases. A novel finding in our study was also the detection of GLUT-1 in a significant percentage (74%) of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. As a part of the neuroendocrine carcinoma spectrum, carcinoids fall into the low- or intermediate-grade end of the spectrum and in contrast to small cell carcinoma and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, they feature better prognosis, less frequent metastasis, lesser proliferative activity and longer mean doubling time.1 To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first documenting GLUT-1 expression in pulmonary carcinoids. As GLUT-1 upregulation is associated with an increased tumor metabolic rate,3 it is not surprising that we found a more frequent GLUT-1 expression in high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas than in typical carcinoids and/or atypical carcinoids. It is reported that GLUT-1 expression correlates with grade in other lung tumors, in particular in adenocarcinomas,21,23 and carcinomas of breast24 and ovary.18 Similarly, we showed that GLUT-1 is seen throughout the entire spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas, suggesting that this isoform plays an important role in glucose metabolism in these tumors. In turn, a consistent GLUT-1 expression in neuroendocrine carcinomas raises the question of whether it is also expressed in normal bronchiolar neuroendocrine cells. In the current set of cases, none of the bronchiolar cores from normal lung parenchyma controls (four cases, among which two cores had occasional neuroendocrine cells) showed GLUT-1 expression. Furthermore, none of the bronchioles/normal neuroendocrine cells from the tested resection specimens (five cases) showed expression of GLUT-1. These data and the absence of GLUT-1 expression in non-neoplastic tissue in lung and other organs (6, 19) suggest that normal neuroendocrine cells are negative for GLUT-1. Evaluation of GLUT-1 expression in hyperplastic neuroendocrine cells as seen in neuroendocrine hyperplasia associated with tumorlets/carcinoids or in the setting of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia and/or in patients with chronic hypoxia as seen in cystic fibrosis or chronic interstitial lung disease appears as a plausible target for future studies.
A strong GLUT-1 immunostaining was shown in the hypoxic regions surrounding the necrotic foci of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung.13,15,21,25 The direct effect of hypoxia on GLUT expression has been observed by increased GLUT-1 mRNA levels, the increased transcription of the GLUT-1 reporter gene, and the modulation of the GLUT-1 protein activity after induction of hypoxia.3 These prior immunohistochemical and molecular observations provide a good foundation to explain the pattern of GLUT-1 expression in neuroendocrine carcinomas. As observed in this study, the GLUT-1 expression was confined to the cellular membrane and was seen preferentially along the luminal borders of the tumor islands in neuroendocrine carcinomas. High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, especially, small cell carcinoma, is one of the most aggressive human malignancies, typically showing high tumor cell proliferation rates and infarct-like necrosis, and is bound to have frequent hypoperfused and/or hypoxic areas. In our study, small cell carcinoma had the most prominent luminal pattern of staining. This finding corresponds to that described in other tumors. Mamede et al25 found that immunoreactivity of GLUT-1 was mainly observed in the membrane of tumor cells and the expression of GLUT-1 localized preferentially at the edge of necrotic areas in non-small-cell carcinoma.
There is increased interest in identifying the association between GLUT-1 expression and prognosis in tumors. Haber et al19 showed that patients with colon carcinomas with greater than 50% GLUT-1-positive malignant cells had a higher mortality rate than patients whose tumors had less than 50% positivity. Similarly, GLUT-1 expression correlated with a less favorable outcome in studies of ovarian18 and breast20 carcinomas and non-small-cell carcinomas of the lung.13 The adverse prognostic significance of GLUT-1 expression was documented in our study as well. We found that within the whole spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas, the patients with GLUT-1-positive tumors had a less favorable outcome than the patients with GLUT-1-negative tumors. Although this finding indicates a potential prognostic value of GLUT-1 for neuroendocrine carcinomas, it appears dependant on the tumor type and stage. When adjusted for tumor type/grade, GLUT-1 expression was also associated with unfavorable outcome for patients with carcinoids. However, as only approximately 12% of carcinoids showed GLUT-1 expression, the significance of its expression on prognosis in carcinoids may require further clarification employing a larger cohort.
In conclusion, similar to other tumors, GLUT-1 expression is seen in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas showing a characteristic membranous pattern of staining and predilection for the luminal aspects of tumor islands. Its expression is observed throughout the entire spectrum of neuroendocrine carcinomas, correlates with the tumor differentiation/grade and likely indicates an important role for this protein in glucose metabolism in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Departments of the Army or Defense. This is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.