PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 April 4.
Published in final edited form as:
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2008 November; 5(4): 204–211.
PMCID: PMC3616484
NIHMSID: NIHMS449996

Emerging Issues in the Neuropsychology of HIV Infection

Abstract

Neurocognitive compromise, a common sequela of HIV infection, ranges in severity from minor motor and information-processing speed decrements to severely incapacitating symptoms that affect functional independence. However, with the emergence of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), neurocognitive phenotypes have become highly heterogeneous and increasingly fail to resemble pre-HAART presentations. This article provides an overview of our current knowledge of HIV-associated neuropsychological abnormalities, with an emphasis on the most recent attempts to classify cognitive impairment within Western and developing societies, the emergence of diverse cognitive presentations in the post-HAART era, factors that moderate the development or impact of HIV-related neurocognitive and functional deficits, and the neurophysiologic consequences of infection.

Introduction

HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection is the most common preventable cause of neurologic decline in individuals under the age of 50 years [1•]. Between 30% and 50% of HIV-positive (HIV+) individuals will experience some form of neurocognitive decline [2], ranging from mild motor and information-processing decrements to severe dysfunction that affects activities of daily living (ADLs) [35]. Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of HIV infection, cognitive impairment remains common and tends to correlate with disease severity. HIV infection most prominently affects the domains of motor functioning, attention, processing speed, executive functioning, and memory [2,6].

Language, visuospatial, and global cognitive functioning are typically intact in the earlier stages of illness, with substantial deficits observed only in late-stage illness or in those with dementia. Symptoms of cortical dementias such as apraxia, agnosia, and aphasia are absent unless patients develop a central nervous system (CNS) opportunistic infection or neoplasm.

This profile of neurocognitive impairment has most commonly been interpreted as reflecting a primarily frontal–subcortical pathogenesis [2], but some neurocognitive (eg, memory) abnormalities may be secondary to mesial temporal disruption [6,7]. A variety of clinical brain markers from MRI [2], magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) [8], diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) [9,10], positron emission tomography (PET) [11], and postmortem histopathologic examination [6] have been linked to the severity of these behaviorally measured neurocognitive deficits. HIV-related cognitive impairment is associated with several immunologic markers, such as reduced plasma CD4 count, increased plasma viral load [12], and elevated cerebrospinal fluid β2-microglobulin [2]. HIV-associated cognitive deficits may lead to difficulties performing instrumental ADLs [3], resulting in poor adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [4] and risky decision making [13].

Classification of HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment

To promote accurate diagnosis of HIV neurocognitive manifestations, the AIDS Task Force of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) published the first research case definitions for HIV-related neurocognitive disorders in 1991 [14]. Two variants of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder were recognized: a more severe variant—HIV-1–associated dementia (HAD) complex—and a less-pronounced presentation—HIV-associated minor cognitive motor disorder (MCMD). A revision of this nosology emerged from a 2007 consensus conference that advanced a modified classification scheme for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (Table 1) [15••]. These new diagnostic criteria differ from the AAN criteria in that they give greater weight to the cognitive aspects of impairment (rather than emotional or motor difficulties) and offer increased recognition of the functional aftermath of neurocognitive decline. Diagnostic criteria are offered for three conditions: HAD, HIV-associated mild neurocognitive disorder (analogous to MCMD), and asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment. Inclusion of the last category is an acknowledgment that patients may demonstrate detectable declines on neuropsychological testing without overt functional declines or patient complaints.

Table 1
Revised research criteria for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

Neurocognitive Effects of HIV in Non-Westernized Societies

The vast majority of HIV infection cases are in sub-Saharan Africa, yet little research to date has investigated the cognitive consequences of HIV infection in this and other resource-limited environments. Many factors, including nutritional differences, alternative HIV strains, and concomitant illnesses, make comparison with Western HIV cases difficult. One recent study in Uganda showed reduced processing speed, attention, executive functioning, and verbal learning/memory among HIV+ individuals relative to controls, thus highlighting neurocognitive similarities between sub-Saharan Africa and the developed world [16]. However, other research has shown that varying viral subtypes (specifically clades A and D) may confer immunologic progression and death at different rates [17]; therefore, it is possible that regionally specific clades are associated with differing neuropathogenic properties and symptom presentations. For example, HIV dementia is far more prevalent (31%) among Ugandans with advanced infection than in North Americans (10%–15%) [18], although, notably, Ugandan prevalence rates for HIV dementia are similar to epidemiologic data from the United States before the HAART era [19]. Various viral subtypes may therefore have differing biological properties and lead to unpredictable patterns of systemic disease progression, neurologic changes, and cognitive compromise, thus signaling the need for more comprehensive research to define the frequency and patterns of cognitive impairment within resource-limited, developing societies.

HIV in the Post-HAART Era

Since the introduction of HAART, the incidence of HAD has declined; however, with increasing longevity, prevalence rates are rising. There also has been a concomitant reduction in the severity of neurocognitive compromise and an alteration in the natural history and trajectory of neurocognitive decompensation. For example, gradual, stabilizing, and fluctuating cognitive courses have been observed among HAART-treated patients [15••]. Others have identified three distinct dementia subtypes, including a subacute progressive dementia among untreated patients (consistent with pre-HAART deterioration), a chronic active dementia in poorly adhering or viral-resistant patients at risk for neurologic progression, and a chronic inactive dementia (“burnt-out” dementia) in medication-adherent patients with effective virologic suppression and resulting neurologic recovery [20]. These varying clinical manifestations have led researchers to promulgate a more global, cortically driven pathogenesis for subsets of HIV-infected individuals, thus straying from historically espoused dysfunction of more restricted subcortical regions [20]. Before the introduction of HAART, the degree of immunosuppression, as indexed by current CD4 count, was loosely associated with the degree of neuropsychological compromise. With the advent of HAART and the resultant immune reconstitution experienced by many patients, this relationship has lessened. Rather, nadir CD4 level and disease duration may now be more predictive of neuropsychological status [7].

Factors That Moderate the Effects of HIV on Cognitive Functioning

The cognitive heterogeneity that has surfaced during the post-HAART era has led investigators to examine several risk factors for the development of HIV impairment and dementia. Areas receiving heightened attention include the effects of aging, coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), substance abuse, and genetic factors; these are discussed in detail in the following paragraphs.

Aging

With the introduction of more effective treatment, mortality rates have plummeted, resulting in the HIV epidemic evolving into a disease increasingly affecting older adults. The number of AIDS cases in individuals over the age of 50 has more than tripled over the last several years; approximately 15% of AIDS patients are now older than 50 years [21]. In some settings, the ranks of older HIV-infected patients are even larger. For example, 42% of HIV-infected patients receiving care through the Veterans Affairs Health Care System are 50 years or older [22]. Compelling evidence suggests that the clinical manifestations and natural history of infection among older HIV+ individuals differ considerably from those observed in younger cohorts, as older adults are at a substantially increased (roughly threefold) risk for developing cognitive decline/dementia. In a recent study, 25.2% of older infected adults received a diagnosis of dementia, whereas only 13.7% of the younger group received this diagnosis [23]. Risk factors for the development of dementia among older infected adults may include low CD4 lymphocyte counts and depressive symptomatology. Besides the higher prevalence of dementia in older versus younger adults, differences also have been found in milder cognitive diagnoses, with 44.7% of the older group and 26.3% of the younger group meeting formal criteria for MCMD.

HIV/HCV comorbidity

Coinfection with HIV and HCV is a burgeoning phenomenon, with approximately one third of HIV-infected individuals in the United States also infected with HCV [24]. Mounting evidence suggests that these viruses exert additive and perhaps synergistic deleterious effects, as both viruses have been observed in the same cell lines (ie, monocytes/macrophages and T and B lymphocytes), HIV infection facilitates HCV replication in monocytes and macrophages, and there is a loss of immunologic control and more rapid progression of HCV in coinfected individuals. Coinfected patients tend to have higher rates of AIDS, lower CD4 counts, and higher plasma viremia than do HIV-monoinfected individuals [25]. They also evidence a greater degree of neurocognitive compromise than do HIV- or HCV-monoinfected persons, with slower reaction times and higher rates of HAD [26•]. The neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying such abnormalities remain unclear.

Although it is possible that some patients have a subclinical hepatic encephalopathy that escapes medical attention, the preponderance of evidence indicates that HCV is a neurotropic virus. HCV is a member of the Flaviviridae family of viruses, which includes many viruses that cause neurologic disease. Increasing evidence suggests that HCV can develop tissue-specific variants and can replicate (albeit at low levels) outside the liver—for example, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [27].

Because HCV can replicate in cell types (eg, monocytes, macrophages) that can cross the blood–brain barrier and enter the brain, HCV may be capable of penetrating the CNS in a manner similar to that ascribed to HIV, the so-called Trojan horse mechanism [28]. Other possible causes for neuropsychiatric syndromes in HIV+/HCV+ patients without overt hepatic disease include changes in the endocrine system associated with HCV-induced thyroiditis and diabetes [29], HCV-induced rheumatologic disease [29], and/or secondary cytokines.

Studies using neuroimaging techniques in tandem with neuropsychological measures may shed light on the brain regions most affected and the corresponding functional repercussions.

Substance abuse and HIV-associated cognitive impairment

HIV-associated cognitive decline has been linked to disruptions of frontostriatal circuitry [2]. Although drugs of abuse have differing mechanisms of action, it is believed that many increase dopamine levels, thereby creating a frontostriatal nexus where HIV disease and substances of abuse might interact to compound neurocognitive deficits. The impact of drug abuse on other neurotransmitter systems and blood–brain barrier integrity may also play a role in neurocognitive deficits. Given the high prevalence of substance abuse in the HIV-infected population, understanding the possible CNS interaction between drugs of abuse and HIV is of clinical significance. Surprisingly, much of the work investigating this possible interaction has suggested subtle or no interactive effects. However, many of these studies used mixed samples of drug abusers, examined possible HIV–drug interactions weeks or months post substance use, and/or lacked appropriate control for HIV and/or substance use.

Studies with less variance in sample characteristics, shorter latencies between substance abuse and neuropsychological examination, and/or appropriate control conditions tend to support an interaction between drugs of abuse and HIV in reducing neurocognition. Taylor et al. [30] found compelling evidence for an HIV–drug interaction effect on frontostriatal circuitry and cognition in a fairly small sample of HIV-negative and HIV+ stimulant-dependent participants. Among the HIV+ stimulant-dependent group, results showed lower N-acetylaspartate (NAA) values in the anterior cingulate gyrus, which correlated with deficits in attention/information processing, psychomotor abilities, memory, and executive functioning. Our group has shown that recent stimulant use impairs psychomotor speed [31] and sustained visual attention [32]. Finally, Martin et al. [33] demonstrated that stimulant use is associated with executive deficits in increased risk-taking behavior among HIV+ individuals.

In conclusion, although previous work investigating the possible effects of an HIV–drug abuse interaction on cognition have yielded mixed results, recent data strongly suggest that stimulant abuse tends to further affect frontostriatal circuitry in HIV+ individuals, leading to greater declines in attention, psychomotor function, and executive abilities. The greater deficits in HIV+ stimulant-abusing groups may also be the result of a third variable, such as a genetic predisposition to cognitive and affective deficits (discussed in the next section) that might make individuals more likely to abuse drugs and to contract HIV disease.

Genetic factors

Research has suggested a number of genetic factors that may protect against or potentiate the cognitive effects of HIV infection [34•]. Many of these genetic factors appear to modulate activation of chemokine receptors that may result from exposure to the HIV glycoprotein gp120, which is associated with HIV-related neuronal damage. For example, a relatively common genetic polymorphism of the chemokine receptor CCR5 (CCR5-delta 32) is believed to confer a protective effect against neurocognitive deterioration, as studies have found reduced CCR5-delta 32 in cases of HIV dementia [35] and a single nucleotide polymorphism of the chemokine receptor CCR2 (ie, CCR2-V641) has been associated with slowed progression to cognitive impairment [36]. In contrast to these cognitively beneficial mutations, genetic polymorphisms for CXCR4 (ie, SDF-1) may promote neuronal toxicity [37]. Finally, possession of the apolipoprotein E4 polymorphism may increase susceptibility to HIV dementia among older infected individuals [38]. Several other, albeit unexplored, genetic mechanisms have been proposed, including genetic mutations affecting dopamine metabolism and brain-derived neurotrophic factor [34•].

Cognitive Impairment and Everyday Functional Abilities

With advanced disease, HIV-infected individuals may experience reduced ability to complete basic ADLs (eg, grooming), and neuropsychological status has been shown to predict such declines [3]. In the following paragraphs, we present a review of the neuropsychological findings associated with three common ADLs: medication management, driving ability, and vocational status.

Medication adherence

Medical advances in treating HIV infection, including the advent of HAART, may dramatically improve mortality, functional level, and quality of life among HIV+ individuals [21] by bolstering immune function as well as cognitive abilities affected by the disease process [39]. However, consistently high levels of adherence are required to modulate aspects of immune functioning (eg, antigen-specific responses and cytokine production) and successfully reconstitute or maintain desirable levels of immune functioning [40]. Unfortunately, objective measures show that only 50% to 60% of HIV-infected patients achieve adequate adherence to their medications [40].

One study conducted by our group [4] revealed that cognitively compromised participants were twice as likely to fail to adequately adhere to their medication regimen, with deficits in executive functioning, attention, and verbal memory specifically associated with poorer HAART adherence. We also found that regimen complexity adversely affected medication adherence for cognitively impaired subjects, whereas regimen complexity was relatively unproblematic for cognitively normal participants (Fig. 1). Follow-up analyses revealed that cognitive compromise in executive abilities and working memory interacted with regimen complexity to produce these marked declines in adherence.

Figure 1
Relationship between cognitive status, regimen complexity, and medication adherence among HIV-infected adults. (Adapted from Hinkin et al. [4]; with permission.)

Although cognitive dysfunction may indeed cause poor adherence, it is also plausible that suboptimal adherence results in untoward clinical outcomes. In fact, a bidirectional relationship may exist between adherence and cognition, with cognitive impairment adversely affecting adherence, in turn resulting in disease progression and worsening of cognitive function.

Recognizing the high prevalence of substance abuse among those with HIV, our group also conducted a longitudinal study of 150 HIV-infected individuals, 102 of whom had recently used illicit drugs [41•]. The results indicated significantly poorer medication adherence among drug-positive subjects when compared with drug-negative subjects. Drug use was associated with a more than fourfold greater risk of poor adherence, with stimulant use, in particular, associated with a sevenfold greater risk. These findings clearly underscore the deleterious effects of substance abuse (particularly of stimulants) on adherence and further suggest that medication adherence is especially affected by the acute effects of intoxication.

Driving ability

Neuropsychological deficits have been associated with declines in driving ability across a number of research paradigms. Marcotte et al. [5] found that mild cognitively impaired subjects failed driving simulations at a rate five to six times greater than that of cognitively intact participants, with attention/working memory, fine motor abilities, visuoconstructive abilities, and nonverbal memory especially predictive of driving ability. Marcotte et al. [42] later showed that neuropsychologically impaired HIV+ participants had more simulator accidents and reduced simulator driving efficiency, failed on-road driving tests at a higher rate, and demonstrated decreased visual processing and divided attention. Moreover, global neuropsychological functioning, simulator accidents, and simulator driving efficiency accounted for 47.6% of the variance in on-road driving performance. In a more recent study, HIV+ participants demonstrated poorer divided attention than controls, with an 11-fold greater risk of problems with divided attention compared with control participants. Attentional performances were used to classify risk level; when high-risk status and general neuropsychological impairment were considered simultaneously, 93% of the HIV+ participants who acknowledged prior automobile accidents were correctly classified [43]. These studies suggest relationships between reduced driving performance and neurocognitive decrements across a variety of domains in infected subjects.

Employment

Unemployment (or underemployment) is common among the HIV-infected population, and research has suggested that neurocognitive functioning may play a significant role in occupational success and maintenance. Heaton et al. [44] found that medically asymptomatic HIV-infected neuropsychologically impaired patients were more than two times more likely to be unemployed and perceived greater vocational difficulties than their unimpaired counterparts, despite their earlier disease stage. Regardless of employment status, HIV+ patients who evidenced neuropsychological impairment perceived themselves to have greater difficulties in vocational functioning than their unimpaired cohorts. The relationship between neuropsychological impairment and employment difficulties could not be explained by depression. Work conducted by van Gorp et al. [45] also suggested that cognitive functioning is associated with vocational success, as effortful learning and memory and motor speed predicted return to employment in HIV+ persons who had terminated employment following diagnosis. These findings argue for a relationship between intact neuropsychological functioning and occupational stability and success.

Neuroimaging and Neuroanatomy of HIV-Associated Neuropsychological Dysfunction

White matter degeneration

It is well established that HIV infection is associated with myelin sheath damage (readily detectable by reduced white matter [WM] volume, WM gliosis and pallor, and high signal intensity), strongly suggesting that infection exercises a predilection for subcortical WM pathways. With the advent of DTI, an advanced MRI method for investigating WM integrity, in vivo analysis of the ways in which WM microstructure contributes to neuropsychological functioning has become possible. Research has shown that DTI possesses the requisite sensitivity to detect HIV-associated WM abnormalities in cases in which tissue appears normal on conventional MRI [46]. The earliest work examining HIV-related microstructural injury using these methods showed that despite having normal-appearing WM on conventional MRI, HIV subjects with detectable viral loads showed DTI findings of decreased fractional anisotropy within the genu and splenium of the corpus callosum and increased diffusion within the frontal and parieto-occipital WM [46].

DTI investigations exploring relationships between WM regions and cognitive functioning in HIV have demonstrated that splenium abnormalities are associated with dementia severity and psychomotor slowing and genu abnormalities are associated with visual memory dysfunction [10]. Reduced integrity of the centrum semiovale was correlated with visuoconstruction and verbal memory impairments [9,10]. The pattern of diffuse WM pathology repeatedly demonstrated in the HIV literature suggests that this may be an important neuropathologic disease manifestation and a possible cause of many observed cognitive deficits. Studies using MRS methods to document metabolite concentrations within frontal WM have found relationships between reduced NAA (a marker of neuronal integrity) and poorer cognition among HIV+ subjects [8].

Basal ganglia degeneration

Arguably the most consistent structural MRI finding to date is HIV-related atrophy of the caudate and the association between caudate volume loss and neuropsychological decrements. Relationships have been reported between caudate atrophy and reduced fine motor dexterity, psychomotor speed, verbal fluency, and auditory attention [47]. DTI methods also have been used to investigate relationships between the basal ganglia and neurocognitive functioning in HIV. Ragin et al. [9] found associations between integrity of the putamen and verbal/visual memory, working memory, and general cognitive status; between the caudate and visual memory; and between the centrum semiovale and visual memory and visuoconstruction. Studies using PET with fluorodeoxyglucose have revealed a two-stage process, with basal ganglia hypermetabolism present initially, followed by global hypometabolism in later stages [11].

Studies exploring relationships between basal ganglia abnormalities detected on MRS imaging and cognitive dysfunction have suggested that higher myoinositol and reduced NAA are associated with poorer cognitive functioning [8]. Other studies examining abnormalities among patients with HIV dementia have suggested glial proliferation and cell membrane injury (with elevated myoinositol and choline levels), as well as significant neuronal injury (lower NAA concentrations) [48]. Histopathologic studies have found associations between antemortem neuropsychological impairment and a reduction in combined microtubule-associated protein (MAP2; a marker of cell bodies and dendrites) and synaptophysin (SYN; a marker of synapses) in the putamen [6].

Cortical degeneration

Although cortical neurodegeneration occurs in HIV/AIDS [49], its relationship to neurocognitive function has been equivocal. Recent neuroimaging research has revealed preferential thinning of primary sensory, motor, and premotor cortices among AIDS patients [50••]. Immunosuppression has been linked to thinning of the language areas and frontal poles bilaterally, and neuropsychological decrements were predicted by cerebral tissue loss within the parietal and prefrontal cortices. Studies examining pathologic involvement within mesial temporal structures have yielded conflicting findings. Although neuroimaging findings have been unclear, a recent immunohistochemical study showed that postmortem neurodegeneration of cell bodies and dendrites (MAP2) and synapses (SYN) in the hippocampus was a strong predictor of antemortem HIV-associated cognitive impairment [6].

Conclusions

Our understanding of the neuropsychological sequelae of HIV infection has grown considerably over the past 20 years. The neurocognitive symptoms that characterize HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder—learning and memory dysfunction, psychomotor slowing, executive dysfunction, and higher-order attentional problems—are well established. Consensus has also been reached regarding the neuropsychiatric effects of the virus, such as increased apathy and irritability, depressive symptoms, and increased levels of anxiety. Studies examining the “real-world” functional impact of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment on behaviors such as medication adherence and driving ability are under way. Refinements in diagnostic nosology have been advanced. Increasingly, the neuroanatomic and neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying neuropsychological dysfunction are being identified.

However, much work remains to be done. Fundamental questions regarding the precise cause(s) of neurocognitive dysfunction remain. We are only beginning to address the additive and interactive effects of common comorbid conditions, such as illicit drug use and HCV infection, on the trajectory of neurocognitive decline. With improvements in HIV-associated morbidity, patients are living for many decades. In a manner reminiscent of the natural history of prostate cancer, the prospects of dying with HIV rather than dying from HIV must now be recognized. Whether HIV infection will act to lower the threshold for age-related cognitive decline has yet to be determined. Other critical gaps include studies linking structural and functional neural systems known to be affected by HIV disease with their real-world functional correlates. Such data not only may improve our scientific understanding regarding the neuropathology of HIV functional decline, but also might suggest neuroanatomic targets for novel pharmacologic and neurocognitive therapies. Finally, we have had only modest success in developing pharmacologic treatments for HIV-associated neurocognitive dysfunction; therefore, this area remains one of the more formidable yet important challenges we must address.

Footnotes

Disclosures No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

1 •. Ances BM, Ellis RJ. Dementia and neurocognitive disorders due to HIV-1 infection. Semin Neurol. 2007;27:86–92. [PubMed] Excellent review of emerging work on the neuropathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and pharmacotherapy of HIV-associated CNS dysfunction.
2. Heaton RK, Grant I, Butters N, et al. The HNRC 500—neuropsychology of HIV infection at different disease stages. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;1:231–251. [PubMed]
3. Heaton RK, Marcotte TD, Mindt MR, et al. The impact of HIV-associated neuropsychological impairment on everyday functioning. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:317–331. [PubMed]
4. Hinkin CH, Castellon SA, Durvasula RS, et al. Medication adherence among HIV+ adults: effects of cognitive dysfunction and regimen complexity. Neurology. 2002;59:1944–1950. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Marcotte TD, Heaton RK, Wolfson T, et al. The impact of HIV-related neuropsychological dysfunction on driving behavior. The HNRC Group. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999;5:579–592. [PubMed]
6. Moore DJ, Masliah E, Rippeth JD, et al. HNRC Group: Cortical and subcortical neurodegeneration is associated with HIV neurocognitive impairment. AIDS. 2006;20:879–887. [PubMed]
7. Brew BJ. Evidence for a change in AIDS dementia complex in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and the possibility of new forms of AIDS dementia complex. AIDS. 2004;18(Suppl 1):S75–S78. [PubMed]
8. Paul RH, Yiannoutsos CT, Miller EN, et al. Proton MRS and neuropsychological correlates in AIDS dementia complex: evidence of subcortical specificity. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19:283–292. [PubMed]
9. Ragin AB, Wu Y, Storey P, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of subcortical brain injury in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Neurovirol. 2005;11:292–298. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Wu Y, Storey P, Cohen BA, et al. Diffusion alterations in corpus callosum of patients with HIV. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:656–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Hinkin CH, van Gorp WG, Mandelkern MA, et al. Cerebral metabolic change in patients with AIDS: report of a six-month follow-up using positron-emission tomography. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;7:180–187. [PubMed]
12. Marcotte TD, Deutsch R, McCutchan JA, et al. Prediction of incident neurocognitive impairment by plasma RNA and CD4 levels early after HIV seroconversion. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1406–1412. [PubMed]
13. Hardy DJ, Hinkin CH, Levine AJ, et al. Risky decision making assessed with the gambling task in adults with HIV. Neuropsychology. 2006;20:355–360. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. American Academy of Neurology: Clinical confirmation of the American Academy of Neurology algorithm for HIV-1-associated cognitive/motor disorder. Neurology. 1996;47:1247–1253. [PubMed]
15 ••. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69:1789–1799. [PubMed] This article details the most recent research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. The diagnostic algorithm advanced in this paper will likely supplant the existing AAN criteria.
16. Robertson KR, Nakasujja N, Wong M, et al. Pattern of neuropsychological performance among HIV positive patients in Uganda. BMC Neurology. 2007;7:8–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Vasan A, Renjifo B, Hertzmark E, et al. Different rates of disease progression on HIV type 1 infection in Tanzania based on infecting subtype. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:843–852. [PubMed]
18. Wong M, Robertson K, Nakasujja N, et al. Frequency of and risk factors for HIV dementia in an HIV clinic in sub-Saharan Africa. Neurology. 2007;68:350–355. [PubMed]
19. Sacktor N. The epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurological disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol. 2002;8(Suppl 2):115–121. [PubMed]
20. McArthur JC. HIV dementia. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:3–10. [PubMed]
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2005. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta: 2007.
22. Philips BR, Mole LA, Backus LI, et al. Caring for Veterans With HIV Disease. Department of Veterans Affairs; Washington DC: 2003.
23. Valcour V, Shikuma C, Shiramizu B, et al. Higher frequency of dementia in older HIV-1 individuals: the Hawaii Aging with HIV-1 Cohort. Neurology. 2004;63:822–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL. Hepatitis C in the HIV-infected person. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:197–207. [PubMed]
25. Greub G, Ledergerber B, Battegay M, et al. Clinical progression, survival, and immune recovery during antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus coinfection: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Lancet. 2000;356:1800–1805. [PubMed]
26 •. Hinkin CH, Castellon SA, Levine AJ, et al. Neurocognition in individuals co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C. J Addict Dis. 2008;27:11–17. [PubMed] Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C is a burgeoning health care concern. This article reviews the literature on HIV/HCV coinfection and argues that cognitive dysfunction is more common among the coinfected population.
27. Forton DM, Karayiannis P, Mahmud N, et al. Identification of unique hepatitis C virus quasispecies in the central nervous system and comparative analysis of internal translational efficiency of brain, liver, and serum variants. J Virol. 2004;78:5170–5183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Forton DM, Thomas HC, Murphy CA, et al. Hepatitis C and cognitive impairment in a cohort of patients with mild liver disease. Hepatology. 2002;35:433–439. [PubMed]
29. El-Serag HB, Hampel H, Yeh C, et al. Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C among United States male veterans. Hepatology. 2002;36:1439–1445. [PubMed]
30. Taylor MJ, Alhassoon OM, Schweinsburg BC, et al. MR spectroscopy in HIV and stimulant dependence. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:83–85. [PubMed]
31. Durvasula RS, Myers HF, Satz P, et al. HIV-1, cocaine, and neuropsychological performance in African American men. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:322–335. [PubMed]
32. Levine AJ, Hardy DJ, Miller E, et al. The effect of recent stimulant use on sustained attention in HIV-infected adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;28:29–42. [PubMed]
33. Martin EM, Pitrak DL, Weddington W, et al. Cognitive impulsivity and HIV serostatus in substance dependent males. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10:931–938. [PubMed]
34 •. Levine AJ, Singer EJ, Shapshak P. The role of host genetic factors in the susceptibility for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. AIDS Behav. 2008 Feb 9; [Epub ahead of print] It is increasingly recognized that gene X environment interactions may explain why some HIV-infected individuals develop neurocognitive and psychiatric dysfunction whereas others do not. This article reviews the role of host genetics and genetic polymorphisms in behavioral expression of neurobehavioral disorders.
35. van Rij RP, Portegies P, Hallaby R, et al. Reduced prevalence of the CCR5 delta32 heterozygous genotype in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals with AIDS dementia complex. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:854–857. [PubMed]
36. Singh KK, Ellis RJ, Marquie-Beck J, et al. sCCR5 polymorphisms affect neuropsychological impairment in HIV-1-infected individuals. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:185–192. [PubMed]
37. Kaul M, Lipton SA. Chemokines and activated macrophages in HIV gp120-induced neuronal apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:8212–8216. [PubMed]
38. Valcour V, Shikuma C, Shiramizu B, et al. Age, apolipoprotein E4, and the risk of HIV dementia: the Hawaii Aging With HIV cohort. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:197–202. [PubMed]
39. Suarez S, Baril L, Stankoff B, et al. Outcome of patients with HIV-1-related cognitive impairment on highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2001;15:195–200. [PubMed]
40. Hinkin CH, Hardy DJ, Mason KI, et al. Medication adherence in HIV-infected adults: effect of patient age, cognitive status, and substance abuse. AIDS. 2004;18(Suppl 1):S19–S25. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41 •. Hinkin CH, Barclay TR, Castellon SA, et al. Drug use and medication adherence among HIV-1 infected individuals. AIDS Behav. 2007;11:185–194. [PubMed] Medication adherence is critically important in preventing HIV-associated morbidity and mortality. This article reviews the literature on predictors of medication adherence and presents data demonstrating the adverse impact of illicit drug use, particularly stimulant use, on medication adherence.
42. Marcotte TD, Wolfson T, Rosenthal TJ, et al. A multimodal assessment of driving performance in HIV infection. Neurology. 2004;63:1417–1422. [PubMed]
43. Marcotte TD, Lazzaretto D, Scott JC, et al. Visual attention deficits are associated with driving accidents in cognitively-impaired HIV-infected individuals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:13–28. [PubMed]
44. Heaton RK, Velin RA, McCutchan JA, et al. Neuropsychological impairment in human immunodeficiency virus-infection: implications for employment. Psychosom Med. 1994;56:8–17. [PubMed]
45. van Gorp WG, Rabkin JG, Ferrando SJ, et al. Neuropsychiatric predictors of return to work in HIV/AIDS. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:80–89. [PubMed]
46. Filippi CG, Ulu AM, Ryan E, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of patients with HIV and normal-appearing white matter on MR images of the brain. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:277–283. [PubMed]
47. Kieburtz K, Ketonen L, Cox C, et al. Cognitive performance and regional brain volume in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:155–158. [PubMed]
48. Chang L, Ernst T, Leonido-Yee M, et al. Cerebral metabolite abnormalities correlate with clinical severity of HIV-1 cognitive motor complex. Neurology. 1999;52:100–108. [PubMed]
49. Paul R, Cohen R, Navia B, et al. Relationships between cognition and structural neuroimaging findings in adults with human immunodeficiency virus type-1. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:353–359. [PubMed]
50 ••. Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Hayashi KM, et al. Thinning of the cerebral cortex visualized in HIV/AIDS reflects CD4+ lymphocyte decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15647–15652. [PubMed] Historically, HIV was thought to preferentially target subcortical gray nuclei and WM. This article demonstrates that HIV infection may lead to neocortical atrophy as well.