PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Cancer Sci Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 March 29.
Published in final edited form as:
J Cancer Sci Ther. 2011 December 29; Suppl 5(4): 004.
PMCID: PMC3612017
NIHMSID: NIHMS420192

Correlation of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR Expression with Metastasis and Response to Treatment in Sarcoma Patients

Abstract

Background

Chemoresistance and metastasis are the main reasons for the failure of current treatments with sarcoma patients. Novel biomarkers are required to predict metastasis and response to treatment. The oncogene MTDH/AEG1 and the long noncoding RNA (lincRNA) HOTAIR are two novel factors involved in drug resistance and metastasis in various types of solid tumors. However, the correlation between MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR expression with metastasis and drug resistance in sarcoma is unknown.

Methods

Expression of MTDH protein or HOTAIR was detected by Western blotting or qRT-PCR, respectively, in primary and metastatic sarcoma patient tissue samples.

Results

High individual or co-expression of MTDH/AEG1 and HOTAIR was observed in three of four primary and six of eight metastatic sarcoma patient tumor samples. High level expression of both of MTDH/AEG1 and HOTAIR in the primary tumor correlated with a likelihood to metastasize. MTDH expression was lower in samples pre-treated with irradiation and/or chemotherapy as compared to those that had not been treated. HOTAIR expression seemed to correlate with the percent necrosis seen in different sarcoma samples.

Conclusions

High levels of both MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR in primary sarcoma are correlated with a high probability of metastasis. By contrast, reduced expression of both MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR is correlated with a good response to treatment in terms of necrosis, suggesting that levels of MTDH and HOTAIR are potential biomarkers for treatment efficacy. Whether we can predict disease progression in sarcoma remains to be seen. Additional study is needed to better define the best clinical application of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR expression with metastasis and outcome.

Keywords: MTDH/AEG-1, HOTAIR, Sarcoma, Metastasis

Introduction

Sarcomas comprise a heterogenous group of soft tissue and bone malignant tumors and are generally resistant to chemotherapy in the metastatic setting [1]. Although all sarcomas share a common origin of the embryonal mesoderm, they exhibit a wide array of histologic subtypes, biological diversity, and responsiveness to treatment [2]. Together sarcomas account for just over 10,600 new cases in the United States annually, amounting to less than 1% of all new cancer diagnoses; however, soft tissue sarcoma is more deadly, possibly because the lack of specific symptoms at early disease stages may lead to delays in diagnosis. Surgery is the primary effective treatment for localized disease. For locally advanced and metastatic disease, the vast majority of soft tissue sarcomas have benefited minimally from treatment with traditional chemotherapy, with chemoresistance and metastasis significantly contributing to the failure of sarcoma therapy [3]. Identification of novel biomarkers to predict response to treatments will facilitate the selection of optimal therapeutic regimens that improve patient survival.

MTDH/AEG-1 (also known as AEG-1 or LYRIC) has recently been identified as a causative factor and potentially crucial dual mediator of both cancer cell metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy [46]. MTDH/AEG-1 was identified as a potential mediator of breast cancer metastasis to the lung [7]. Later, the genomic copy number gain at chromosome 8q22, which contains the MTDH/AEG-1 gene, was recognized as a defining event in both metastasis and chemoresistance in breast cancer patients [8], providing evidence for a role for MTDH in both of these oncogenic processes. Furthermore, MTDH/AEG- 1 overexpression at the protein level has been correlated with poor outcomes in a number of types of solid tumors, including gliomas [9,10], melanomas, neuroblastomas, carcinomas of the breast [11], prostate cancer [12], hepatocellular cancer [13] and lung cancer [14]. MTDH/AEG-1 is also now known to mediate broad-spectrum resistance to various chemotherapeutics, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin, by increasing gene expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and augmenting translation of multidrug resistance gene 1(MDR1) [15].

Increased expression of HOTAIR in primary breast, liver, and colon tumors has recently emerged as another powerful predictor of eventual metastasis and chemoresistance [16]. HOTAIR is a long non-coding RNA (lincRNA) residing in the HOXC locus [17]. The lincRNA HOTAIR serves as a scaffold for at least two distinct histone modification complexes: a 5′ domain of HOTAIR binds to the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), whereas a 3′ domain of HOTAIR associates with the LSD1/CoREST/REST complex [18]. Overexpression of HOTAIR in epithelial cancer cells alters histone H3 lysine 27 methylation to promote gene expression and thereby increase cancer invasiveness and metastasis [18]. Conversely, loss of HOTAIR reduces cancer cell viability and invasion and increases sensitivity to cisplatin and doxorubicin. To date, however, the significance of MTDH and HOTAIR expression in sarcoma has not been evaluated. In this pilot study of primary and metastatic sarcoma patients, we explore the expression of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR in primary and secondary lesions and determine how their levels correlate with metastasis and response to treatment.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Primary and metastatic tumor tissues from sarcoma subjects were collected under a University of Iowa Institutional Review Board approved protocol. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study. De-identified sarcoma samples, disease status, and treatments were recorded in Table 1.

Table 1
Detailed description of disease status and treatments before and after sample collection in three groups of sarcoma subjects

Antibodies and Western blotting

The following antibodies were used: anti-MTDH and anti-β-actin antibodies from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Whole-cell protein lysates were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting as previously described [20].

Detection of HOTAIR by real-time PCR

Expression analysis of HOTAIR was carried out by quantitative RT-PCR (q-RT-PCR). RNA was isolated from frozen cancer tissues from sarcoma samples using the mirVana microRNA isolation kit (Ambion, Austin) per the manufacturer’s instructions. qRT-PCR was performed with total RNA using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad) and Syber Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, CA). The following primers for HOTAIR and 18S rRNA (IDT, Coralville, IA), were used:

  • HOTAIR Forward primer 5′-GGTAGAAAAAGCAACCACGAAGC-3′
  • HOTAIR Reverse primer 5′-ACATAAACCTCTGTCTGTGAGTGCC-3′
  • 18S rRNA Forward primer 5′-GCTTAATTTGACTCAACACGGGA-3′
  • 18S rRNA Reverse primer 5′-AGCTATCAATCTGTCAATCCTGTC-3′

Results

High expression of MTDH and HOTAIR in primary sarcoma may predict high probability of metastasis

To determine the relative expression of MTDH at the protein level (Figure 1) and the lincRNA HOTAIR (Figure 2), we first determined the baseline expression of these factors in a primary sarcoma sample, #1035, that consisted of a high grade primary myxofibrosarcoma which was completely resected without any prior treatment and no evidence of metastasis at the time of resection or thereafter. This sample was used as the control to assess MTDH and HOTAIR expression in other sarcoma samples. Importantly, there was no detectable MTDH and low levels of HOTAIR (Figures 1,,2).2). Overexpression of MTDH and a greater than 800-fold increase in HOTAIR was detected in a high grade synovial sarcoma sample, #1261. Metastatic disease was detected one month after resection of this sample in the lung. MTDH overexpression and a nearly10-fold increase in HOTAIR was also observed in a high grade myxofibrosarcoma sample, #1194 with lung metastasis present at diagnosis. Interestingly, a lung metastasis, #0931, in a subject with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor that was resected previously demonstrated an overexpression of MDTH and HOTAIR. A sample of the primary lesion was not available for comparison. Sarcoma sample, #0227, from a high grade leiomyosarcoma showed high expression of both MTDH and HOTAIR. However, this subject received adjuvant chemotherapy (Gemcitabine and Taxotere) and thus far shows no evidence of metastasis. A pearson’s product-moment coefficient between MTDH with HOTAIR is 0.259, indicating the correlation of MTDH with HOTAIR in primary sarcoma samples. Based on these it is probable that high grade sarcomas that overexpress MTDH and HOTAIR will likely metastasize. This population could be the target of more aggressive therapy (Table 1A).

Figure 1
Expression of MTDH in primary or metastatic cancer tissues from sarcoma samples
Figure 2
Expression of HOTAIR in primary or metastatic cancer tissues from sarcoma subjects

Samples from select sarcoma subjects pretreated with radiation and/or chemotherapy demonstrated a reduction in MTDH expression and maintained a relatively high HOTAIR expression compared to the control that correlated with the percent necrosis on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stain

Sample #0850, a high grade pleomorphic leiomyosarcoma, treated with radiation and chemotherapy (Mitomycin C, Adriamycin, Cisplatin) showed a low MTDH expression and persistent HOTAIR expression. This subject later developed lung metastasis. Sample #0703, a high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma that received chemotherapy (Gemcitabine, Taxotere) showed an absence of MTDH and HOTAIR expression and a 100% necrosis. Sample #1139, a high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma, was resected after the subject received chemotherapy (Gemcitabine, Taxotere) and showed absent MTDH expression and persistent HOTAIR expression. Sample #0796 was a high grade leiomyosarcoma metastasis in an adrenal gland that received radiation therapy prior to resection and again demonstrated absent MTDH with robust HOTAIR expression. Interestingly there was only 5% necrosis in this sample. As shown in Figure 3, expression of HOTAIR is reverse correlated with the percentage of necrosis after treatments in group B samples. The pearson’s product-moment coefficient is −0.992 (Table 1B).

Figure 3
Correlation of the expression level of HOTAIR with the percent necrosis in group B tumor samples

Three sarcoma samples expressed variable levels of both MTDH and HOTAIR

Sample #0006 is a low grade myxoid liposarcoma that was metastatic at diagnosis and showed an absent expression of MTDH and a slightly high expression of HOTAIR. This is the only low grade metastatic lesion assessed and may explain the low MTDH level, implying that grade may predict different levels of expression of MTDH. Interestingly two sarcoma samples, #0268 and #0510, obtained from lung metastasis demonstrated very high MTDH and low HOTAIR. One sample from the lung, #0931, demonstrated both overexpression of MTDH and HOTAIR. These cases imply that lung metastatic leisions persistently express high levels of MTDH (Table 1C).

Discussion

MTDH/AEG1 and HOTAIR are two novel metastasis-related oncogenes overexpressed in breast cancer and other solid tumors [20,21], yet their roles in sarcoma metastasis and response to treatment was previously not assessed. Our pilot study shows that overexpression of both MTDH/AEG1 and HOTAIR correlates with a high probability for metastasis in primary sarcoma subjects. The fact that, in some subjects, either MTDH or HOTAIR is overexpressed in metastatic tissue samples indicates that it is possible for either MTDH/AEG1 or HOTAIR alone to serve as an independent prognostic marker for metastasis. However, some subjects with high MTDH/AEG-1 or HOTAIR expression in the collected sample demonstrated a favorable response to treatment or no evidence of disease after treatment. It will be interesting to explore whether these post-collection treatments efficiently inhibit MTDH-and HOTAIR-mediated metastasis and cancer development in these subjects.

Compared to samples from subjects who did not receive any form of treatment, be it chemotherapy or irradiation, undetectable or reduced levels of MTDH was observed in samples from subjects that had been treated. Our clinical observations indicate that both chemotherapy and/or radiation may promote down-regulation of MTDH in sarcoma subjects. However, without evaluation of the levels of MTDH in tumors before and after treatment, we cannot definitively conclude that radiation or chemo alters MTDH expression. Future in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal model studies of the effect of irradiation on the levels of MTDH will help to address this important question. It was interesting to see an expression level of HOTAIR that correlated with the percent necrosis in tumor samples exposed to chemotherapy and/or radiation, being high when minimal necrosis is present (#0796) or low with maximum necrosis (#0703) present. Long-term follow-up to evaluate response to treatment as well as to monitor the expression of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR in recurrent disease will determine the effect of MTDH/AEG-1 and HOTAIR levels on success of therapeutic treatments. Study of a large number of subjects paired with long-term evaluation is critical to elucidate whether MTDH/AEG1 and HOTAIR levels correlate with metastasis and response to therapeutic treatments.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH Grant R01CA99908 to K.K.L., and in part by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research Development Fund, the Institutional Research Grant Number IRG-77-004-31 from the American Cancer Society to XM, administered through the Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Iowa. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank the University of Iowa DNA Core Facility for technical assistance and Kristina W. Thiel for assistance in manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

References

1. Ceyssens S, Stroobants S. Sarcoma. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;727:191–203. [PubMed]
2. Taylor BS, Barretina J, Maki RG, Antonescu CR, Singer S, et al. Advances in sarcoma genomics and new therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:541–557. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Batista LM, Carvalho CH, Acioly MA, Gharabaghi A, Ramina KF, et al. Spinal metastasis of endometrial stromal sarcoma: clinicopathological features and management. Surg Oncol. 2011;20:e78–e83. [PubMed]
4. Kwong LN, Chin L. The metastasis problem gets stickier. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:1–2. [PubMed]
5. Hu G, Wei Y, Kang Y. The multifaceted role of MTDH/AEG-1 in cancer progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5615–5620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Liu H, Song X, Liu C, Xie L, Wei L, et al. Knockdown of astrocyte elevated gene-1 inhibits proliferation and enhancing chemo-sensitivity to cisplatin or doxorubicin in neuroblastoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Brown DM, Ruoslahti E. Metadherin, a cell surface protein in breast tumors that mediates lung metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:365–374. [PubMed]
8. Wei Y, Hu G, Kang Y. Metadherin as a link between metastasis and chemoresistance. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2132–2133. [PubMed]
9. Xia Z, Zhang N, Jin H, Yu Z, Xu G, et al. Clinical significance of astrocyte elevated gene-1 expression in human oligodendrogliomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:413–419. [PubMed]
10. Emdad L, Sarkar D, Lee SG, Su ZZ, Yoo BK, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1: a novel target for human glioma therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:79–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Su P, Zhang Q, Yang Q. Immunohistochemical analysis of Metadherin in proliferative and cancerous breast tissue. Diagn Pathol. 2010;5:38. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Kikuno N, Shiina H, Urakami S, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, et al. Knockdown of astrocyte-elevated gene-1 inhibits prostate cancer progression through upregulation of FOXO3a activity. Oncogene. 2007;26:7647–7655. [PubMed]
13. Yoo BK, Emdad L, Su ZZ, Villanueva A, Chiang DY, et al. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 regulates hepatocellular carcinoma development and progression. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:465–477. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Song L, Li W, Zhang H, Liao W, Dai T, et al. Over-expression of AEG-1 significantly associates with tumour aggressiveness and poor prognosis in human non-small cell lung cancer. J Pathol. 2009;219:317–326. [PubMed]
15. Yoo BK, Chen D, Su ZZ, Gredler R, Yoo J, et al. Molecular mechanism of chemoresistance by astrocyte elevated gene-1. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3249–3258. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Kanduri C. Long noncoding RNA and epigenomics. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011;722:174–195. [PubMed]
17. Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–1076. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Tsai MC, Manor O, Wan Y, Mosammaparast N, Wang JK, et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science. 2010;329:689–693. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Meng X, Brachova P, Yang S, Xiong Z, Zhang Y, et al. Knockdown of MTDH sensitizes endometrial cancer cells to cell death induction by death receptor ligand TRAIL and HDAC inhibitor LBH589 co-treatment. PloS One. 2011;6:e20920. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Hu G, Chong RA, Yang Q, Wei Y, Blanco MA, et al. MTDH activation by 8q22 genomic gain promotes chemoresistance and metastasis of poor-prognosis breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:9–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Wan Y, Chang HY. HOTAIR: Flight of noncoding RNAs in cancer metastasis. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:3391–3392. [PMC free article] [PubMed]