|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
The psychological pressure on soldiers during World War I (WWI) and other military conflicts has resulted in many reported cases of psychogenic gait as well as other movement disorders. In this paper, psychogenic movement disorders captured in the WWI film footage “War Neuroses” is reanalyzed.
Two movement disorders specialists re-examined film images of 21 WWI patients with various and presumed psychogenic manifestations, pre- and post treatment. The film was recorded by Arthur Hurst, a general physician with an interest in neurology.
All 21 subjects were males, and all presented with symptoms relating to war trauma or a psychological stressor (e.g., being buried, shrapnel wounds, concussion, or trench fever). The most common presenting feature was a gait disorder, either pure or mixed with another movement disorder (15), followed by retrograde amnesia (2), abnormal postures (pure dystonia) (1), facial spasm (1), head tremor (1), “hyperthyroidism-hyperadrenalism” (1). Nineteen patients received treatment, and the treatment was identified in nine cases. In most cases, treatment was short and patients improved almost immediately. Occupational therapy was the most common treatment. Other effective methods were hypnosis (1), relaxation (1), passive movements (2), and probable “persuasion and re-education” (6).
The high success rate in treating psychogenic disorders in Hurst’s film would be considered impressive by modern standards, and has raised doubt in recent years as to whether parts of the film were staged and/or acted.
The psychological pressures on soldiers during World War I (WWI) and in other military conflicts have resulted in many reported cases of psychogenic gait and other movement disorders.1 Motion pictures of soldiers were rarely used prior to WWI. Arthur Hurst captured film footage of psychogenic gaits and other potential psychogenic movement disorders both pre- and post treatment during the WWI era. His film collection resides in the Wellcome Library in London.
In WWI, British soldiers faced the death penalty for refusing to engage in conflict.2 Private Henry Farr was famously sentenced to death for refusing to join the trenches during the battle for the Western Front. Henry was one of 306 soldiers executed for “cowardice,”2 and his case documents the tremendous psychological strain encountered by many during this conflict. Historical archives suggest that over 80,000 British soldiers suffered from “shell shock” as a direct result of combat exposure.3 Soldiers reported not only physical symptoms but also psychological traumas. Combat stress reactions experienced by soldiers (shell shock) ranged from crippling panic attacks, anxiety, and persistent amnesia to tremor, word-blindness, nightmares, and other physical manifestations. The full array of reactions was captured by Hurst in his photo documentary.4
Rare physicians were able to address psychiatric symptoms during and after WWI.5 Major Arthur Hurst, a General Physician with a particular interest in Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, and Gastroenterology, filled this vacuum. Hurst achieved notoriety for his creative approaches to treatment, which included re-education, persuasion, and suggestion.6 Hurst was born Arthur Hertz on July 23 1879 in Bradford, UK.1,5 His scientific career started when he attended Magdalen College, Oxford, where he won a Science Demy-Ship and in 1901 became a student at Guy’s Hospital,7 where he won Gold Medals in both clinical medicine and surgery. In 1904 he was awarded his Bachelor of Medicine, BCh, from Oxford. In 1905, he won a Radcliffe traveling fellowship that shaped his future practice as a physician. He chose to go to France and Germany, where he met some of the greatest neurologists of the time, including Dejerine, Babinski, and Marie.8,9 In 1907, Hurst was appointed initially as a physician of the Electrical Department, but was quickly promoted and started the first Neurology Outpatient department at Guy’s Hospital. In 1915 he left to serve in WWI, initially in the Gallipoli campaign, and later in Salonika, before he returned in 1916. Hurst then persuaded the military to convert Seale Hayne Agricultural College into a special hospital for the treatment of war neuroses.8 It was at this time in 1917 when he began his transformation into a leading light in the treatment of these conditions. Hurst considered himself a proponent of the questioning of medical tradition.5 During this time he was able to persuade the French film industry, the Pathé Motion Picture Co., to help with production of the movie for 8 months. The film was used for training and research.8 The overall purpose of the film was educational, and aimed to clarify the diagnosis of various manifestations of shell shock and to document the effects of treatment. He wrote about the “remarkable” change in many patients who were afflicted. Hurst, throughout his life, was bestowed with many appointments, awards, and accolades. He would retire as Professor of Medicine at Guy’s Hospital and Oxford. He died in 1944 at the age of 65.1
The types of treatment approaches promoted by Hurst were employed to address manifestations of what became known as combat fatigue syndrome, or post-traumatic stress disorder.4 The film, titled “War Neuroses”, was intended to demonstrate Hurst’s specific treatment techniques to physicians. Until his death he maintained the efficacy of his methods.5
The medical literature on Arthur Hurst and on all existing WWI Hurst films was reviewed. The search uncovered a 27-min film housed in the Wellcome Library. The film is publicly available at http://film.wellcome.ac.uk:15151/mediaplayer.html?0055-0000-4163-0000-0-0000-0000-0.
This film was shot in the Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley, UK, in 1917, and the Seale Hayne Military Hospital in 1918. The analysis included 21 patients who manifested several neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms (Table 1).
When reviewing the film, two movement disorders specialists (M.M. and M.O.) analyzed the film independently and, based on available data, later discussed each case and reached an agreement on the likely pre-treatment diagnosis, the types of treatments administered, the time course for recovery, and the overall outcomes. The specialists describe the phenomenology and interpretation of the treatment responses in these patients (Table 2).
The entire film contains a total of 23 film clips. There were 20 film clips presenting patient cases: one clip showing a mix of previous patients, one clip showing patients during activities considering occupational therapy, and the final film clip presenting a re-enactment film called “The Battle of Seale Hayne.”
The film featured 21 patients (on Film 6, two patients are presented) with various presumed psychogenic manifestations of disease. All of the patients were male. All presented with symptoms resulting from a war-related trauma (e.g., being buried, shrapnel wounds, concussion, or trench fever).
Overall, one patient presented abnormal posture (dystonia), one had facial spasm, one had head tremor, one presented with what was described as “hyperthyroidism–hyperadrenalism,” and two patients presented with retrograde amnesia.
Fifteen presented with a gait disorder, and of these patients just three presented with a pure gait disturbance and 12 presented with at least one other movement disorder (seven presented with tremor, three with dystonia, one with rigidity, and one with akinesia) (Table 3).
All of the cases were documented as manifesting symptoms between 1916 and 1918. Eighteen patients received treatment. In 10, the treatment was included in the film and in the remainder it was not. Five patients received more than one treatment, as shown on film clips 4, 5, 6, 15, and 16. One received relaxation and passive movements as a treatment, one re-education and occupational therapy, one had suggestion and occupational therapy, one had suggestion and re-education, and one had persuasion and re-education.
Occupational therapy (marching, working on the farm, stacking bricks together, carrying tools, and making baskets) was the most common treatment; however, one soldier was treated with hypnosis, and one with relaxation, two with passive movements, and six had presumed treatment with persuasion/re-education. The treatment duration varied between 15 min and 2.5 years. Eighteen patients (86%) had partial or complete recovery, two were not shown in the film, and one had no benefit. (Table 3).
Arthur Hurst’s WWI documentary demonstrated a significant improvement in many psychogenic gait and movement disorder symptoms. Notable to the modern clinician was that the improvement often occurred over a very short period of time, ranging from a few hours to a few months. In modern practice, most of the symptoms would be diagnosed as psychogenic movement disorders. There were, however, particular areas of concern with Hurst’s documentary. For example, Hurst fails to describe the exact definitions of “persuasion and re-education”. In a separate documented interview, Hurst commented that re-education encompassed bed rest, isolation from loud noises, fresh air, isolation from sunlight, and fake surgery.8 When treating a patient he often removed any references to the war, recommended resting the body and mind, recommended refraining from alcohol, and he also recommended the repression of all memories of recent events.6 He suggested to the patients that they would experience complete recovery in 24 hours, even if hospitalized for years;8 this type of approach would ultimately not be embraced by modern psychiatry. The last film clip “The Battle of Seale Hayne” could be considered as part of the therapeutic protocol in Dr. Hurst’s practice, in which the soldiers were sent to the field and asked to experience real battlefield re-enactment. The most remarkable aspect of this re-enactment was its foreshadowing of modern desensitization therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder, which has received much press recently in its contemporary reincarnation.10
Occupational therapy (marching, working on the farm, stacking bricks together, carrying tools, and making baskets), which was highlighted in the film, was reported to be effective in all patients. In severe cases, Hurst used sodium diethyl-barbiturate in combination with acetyl salicylic acid.6 Dysfuntion of the thyroid and adrenal secretion were treated with belladonna and thyroid X-rays.6 He also applied faradism frequently.3,6,8,11 These treatments were not reported in the film. Additionally, in most cases shown in the film, Hurst never indicated which of his techniques was applied to individual patients, and also whether he employed multiple treatments. Finally, the involvement of the French movie industry made it likely that acting and staging were involved in at least part of the film, although this has never been formally clarified.8
An important concern has been raised about the clip of Sergeant Bissett, which was allegedly filmed in September 1917 through to November 1917, when Sergeant Bissett experienced significant improvement in his condition. In this clip, the background, the column of smoke from the chimney, and the position of the nurses, all suggested that the clip was filmed in one day, and that the patient may have been re-enacting or acting out a previous disorder.8 The re-enacting of psychogenic disorders was not uncommon in the period, and this was seen previously with Charcot’s “Lessons at the Salpêtrière” in which some have suggested that many of the episodes featuring hysterical patients were actually staged.12,13
Hurst was familiar with hysteria. He employed techniques such as checking for consistency of movements when seated, and when standing, and he also utilized maneuvers described by Blocq, Babinski, and Charcot in Film 7 (the chair test) and Film 16 (testing the legs in bed).14
Several of the patients in this film met many of the criteria proposed by Gupta and Lang.15 These criteria for the diagnosis of psychogenic movement disorders include abrupt onset, presence of psychological stressors (present in all patients), movement inconsistent with great variability of the symptoms (shown in Film 1, 4, 5, 6, 16, and 17), distractibility (Film 4), mixed and bizarre movements (shown in Film 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, and 18), and suggestibility (probably in all cases but not shown on the film). Additionally, the very rapid recoveries (if not re-enactments), and the observation that the patients never “fell,” would further suggest psychogenic illness.
Among psychogenic problems,16 dystonia and tremor have been the most frequently reported.15,17,18 In Arthur Hurst’s film these symptoms were common and in some cases overlapping; 19% presenting with dystonia, 38% presenting with tremor. The most common diagnosis was unspecified gait disorder, which presented in 71% of patients. There is a possibility that organic disease co-existed with psychogenic illness in this film, at least in some of the documented patients. It is known that psychogenic movements can complicate and also be embedded into pre-existing organic movement disorder in approximately 10–25% of cases.18,19 We cannot exclude this possibility without more information.
None of the available WWI papers20,21 describe movement disorders such as in Hurst’s film. Jones8 previously reported how the film was actually made, describing one patient Meek, and also revealing some of the pictures used in the original movie. He revealed that the first patient in the movie was exposed to electric shock therapy for restoration of his speech.8
Hurst himself published an article in the British Medical Journal6 suggesting that amnesia, hysteria, hyperadrenalism, hyperthyroidism, and exaggerated reflexes could all result from an emotional storm. He also suggested that the inability to move or speak after a situation involving terror could cause mutism and hysterical paraplegia. Hurst emphasized that for successful treatment, a medical officer should be convinced that the symptoms were not organic, and that organic symptoms could sometimes be superimposed.6
WWI was undoubtedly psychologically devastating for soldiers fighting on the front lines. The significant rise in incidences of shell shock was met initially by those in the medical field, as well as the lay public, with confusion and a lack of understanding, as demonstrated by the tragic case of Private Henry Farr. Arthur Hurst’s documentary, even with its significant limitations and possible re-enacting, attempted to document the psychogenic component underlying the physical manifestations of shell shock. It is very interesting that there were significant improvements in patients after re-education, hypnosis, suggestion, and other modalities. A more thorough appreciation of the history of those disorders which occur as a result of war may aid us in approaching the treatment of veterans returning from war, and also help us in adopting more reasonable approaches to other psychogenic illnesses. Early identification and rapid interdisciplinary treatment of these disorders are recommended.
Financial Disclosures: None.
Conflict of Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest.