|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Shifting HIV treatment tasks from physicians to nurses and midwives is essential to scaling-up HIV services in sub-Saharan Africa. Updating nursing and midwifery regulations to include task shifting and pre-service education reform can help facilitate reaching new HIV targets. Donor-supported initiatives to update nursing and midwifery regulations are increasing. However, there are gaps in our knowledge of current practice and education regulations and a lack of information to target and implement regulation strengthening efforts. We conducted a survey of national nursing and midwifery councils to describe current nursing and midwifery regulations in 13 African countries.
A 30-item survey was administered to a convenience sample of 13 national nursing and midwifery regulatory body leaders in attendance at the PEPFAR-supported African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative meeting in Nairobi, Kenya on 28 February, 2011. The survey contained questions on task shifting and regulations such as registration, licensure, scope of practice, pre-service education accreditation, continuing professional development and use of international guidelines. Survey data were analyzed to present country-level, comparative and regional findings.
Task shifting to nurses and midwives was reported in 11 of the 13 countries. Eight countries updated their scope of practice within the last five years; only one reported their regulations to reflect task shifting. Countries vary with regard to licensure, pre-service accreditation and continuing professional development regulations in place. There was no consistency in terms of what standards were used to design national practice and education regulations.
Many opportunities exist to assist countries to modernise regulations to incorporate important advancements from task shifting and pre-service reform. Appropriate, revised regulations can help sustain successful health workforce strategies and contribute to further scale-up HIV services and other global health priorities.
This study provides fundamental information from which to articulate goals and to measure the impact of regulation strengthening efforts.
In much of sub-Saharan Africa, a severe shortage of health care workers and a disproportionately high burden of disease make it difficult to provide basic health services, much less meet ambitious new targets for combating HIV/AIDS [1–4]. Efforts by countries to respond to the HIV epidemic have highlighted the importance of the health workforce and have focused attention on the practice and education of health care workers [5–7]. Many global health initiatives, such as the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), involve strategies to expand the capacity of the health workforce, such as strengthening health professional pre-service education and shifting the responsibility for delivering HIV services from physicians to mid-level health professionals (task shifting) [8–11]. Many HIV-related tasks previously assumed by physicians, such as diagnosing HIV infections, initiating anti-retroviral therapy (ART) and administering prevention of mother-to-child (PMTCT) regimens, are now carried out by nurses and midwives [5, 12–15]. There is wide agreement in the global health community that, in order to be sustainable, workforce strategies, such as pre-service strengthening and task shifting, should be incorporated into nationally endorsed health professional regulatory frameworks [9, 16–18]. Nursing and midwifery regulations that allow for and incorporate task shifting and pre-service strengthening can be instrumental in helping sub-Saharan African countries further expand HIV service delivery and reach new World AIDS Day targets [6, 10, 19–21].
Health professional regulation ensures the safety and quality of health professional practice and education [22–24]. Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have a professional regulatory body, such as a nurses and midwives council, which issues the national regulations and standards for nursing and midwifery education and practice in their country (Table 1) [25, 26]. While regional and global leadership in the field has helped advance nursing and midwifery governance in the region, keeping regulations on pace with dynamic national and international health priorities has been challenging [27–29]. Global health donors and policy makers have encouraged revising key regulations, including licensing and registration, scopes of practice and pre-service education accreditation, to help ensure that advancements in service delivery from task shifting and pre-service reform are sustained [14, 30–32]. While the calls for revising regulatory frameworks mount, there are large gaps in our understanding of the current state of global health professional regulation and a lack of information from which to target and support regulation strengthening efforts [6, 9, 15, 17, 33].
We conducted a survey of the leaders of national nursing and midwifery councils (called registrars) who are responsible for issuing and updating nursing and midwifery regulations in their country. The aim of the survey was to describe current nursing and midwifery practice and education regulations in 13 countries of east, central and southern Africa (ECSA). This is basic information necessary to assist the global health community and partner countries to better articulate and undertake regulation-strengthening efforts in the region. Furthermore, this information can serve as a baseline against which progress in advancing regulatory frameworks can be measured. The survey took place at a PEPFAR-supported conference, the African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives (ARC), which convened nursing and midwifery leadership from 14 ECSA countries to discuss priorities and approaches to strengthening nursing and midwifery regulation in the region (Figure 1). The Registrar from each country was specifically invited to attend. Detailed information on the ARC initiative can be found elsewhere .
A 30-item survey was administered on 28 February, 2011, to a convenience sample of ARC participants representing their national nursing and midwifery councils. The survey elicited information on key regulatory functions, such as registration and data collection, licensure, scopes of practice, accreditation of pre-service institutions, continuing professional development (CPD), standards used for setting regulations and task shifting from physicians to nurses and midwives. Questions were structured with yes/no choices and comment boxes, short answer and short essay questions. Study participants completed the written survey individually with no time limit. Surveys were conducted in English, as all of the countries, with the exception of Mozambique, were Anglophone. The Mozambican survey participant who did not speak English was provided an official translator to assist in completing the survey. All study materials were approved by the University of Washington Institutional Review Board and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Office of the Associate Director for Science.
Thirteen surveys were completed out of the 14 countries at ARC (the South Africa nursing council Registrar was invited but were unable to attend the meeting). Results from the surveys are provided below and divided into information on task shifting, registration and data collection, licensure, CPD, scopes of practice, pre-service accreditation and use of professional standards.
Nursing and midwifery council registrars were asked if task shifting from physicians to nurses for HIV/AIDS and TB care occurred in their countries and whether practice and education regulations currently reflected task shifting. Eleven of the 13 registrars indicated that task shifting occurs, with some respondents stating that in their country, this type of task shifting was not yet “officially” endorsed. The registrars from Mauritius and Zimbabwe indicated that task shifting does not occur at all. Of the 11 countries in which task shifting is taking place, only Tanzania indicated that current regulations for nurses and midwives could allow for task shifting.
Survey participants were asked if they kept a national register of nurses and midwives and to indicate this data collected on the register (Table 2). All respondents indicated that there is a register maintained by the council (except for Mozambique which indicated that the register of health professionals is kept by the Ministry of Health). Each country with a register tracks “registered” professional nurses and midwives; nine councils collect data on the “enrolled” (i.e. vocational or practical) level of nurses and midwives. Eight councils also track nursing and midwifery students in pre-service education. The employment status and the professional specialty are collected by eight and six councils, respectively, but only two councils keep track of which nurses and midwives on the register are educators. In seven countries, the register is primarily electronic, while the remaining countries use a system that is still partly paper-based. All councils in this region require the nurse or midwife to maintain a current status on the register by “renewing” their registration or professional licence every one or three years.
Registrars were queried about procedures for licensure, continuing professional development and accreditation of pre-service education (Table 3). Eleven ECSA councils issue licences to qualifying nurses and midwives. Five nursing and midwifery councils require a licensure examination to ensure that initial knowledge and competency standards are met; the remaining six councils issue licences upon proof of passing the final nursing education examination. Eight countries currently have national CPD programs for nurses and midwives; only three currently require proof of completing CPD in order to renew a professional licence. Almost all registrars responded that accreditation of pre-service education is the responsibility of the council yet only four indicated that accreditation status is renewed on a regular basis.
Nursing and midwifery council registrars were asked if they had an official scope of practice for nurses and midwives and how recently that scope of practice had been reviewed or revised (Table 4). All the surveyed countries indicated that there was an official scope of practice, with the exception of Mauritius and Mozambique where a broad scope of practice is defined for all civil service employees. Of the countries reporting a nursing and midwifery scope of practice, eight indicated that they had reviewed their scope of practice within the last five years, and three countries had reviewed them between 13 and 15 years ago.
Registrars were asked what standards were used as the basis for developing major regulations, such as the licensure examination, scope of practice, CPD program and pre-service education accreditation criteria (Table 5). Eleven countries reported using a combination of guidelines and standards from regional and international normative organizations (e.g., The East, Central and Southern College of Nursing, The International Council of Nurses) to design national regulations. It did not appear that countries used the same professional standards or guidelines in formulating their national regulations.
Despite publication of the joint task shifting guidelines from the World Health Organization, PEPFAR and the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS in 2008, our understanding of how to adapt nursing and midwifery regulations to ensure sustainable task shifting and pre-service reform is weak. Establishing a baseline of nursing and midwifery regulations for sub-Saharan African countries can help identify strategic opportunities to assist countries in their efforts to advance nursing and midwifery practice and education. This study found that essential professional regulations, such as registration, licensure and pre-service accreditation were well established in most ECSA countries. Regulations addressing scope of practice, licensure examinations, CPD systems and accreditation renewal varied more widely and present potential areas for regulatory strengthening. For example, findings from this study indicate that even recently updated scopes of practice do not reflect the HIV services that nurses and midwives provide as a result of task shifting.
Only five of the ECSA countries surveyed require nurses and midwives to pass an examination by the nursing council prior to receiving a licence to practise. Licensure examinations can help ensure general competency but are also a means of testing and credentialing specialty knowledge. Training and licensing nurses for prescription of ART and management of HIV/AIDS patients has been implemented in some ECSA countries, most notably Botswana, South Africa and Zambia [21, 28, 35, 36], and could offer an effective method of expanding nurse-initiated HIV treatment and delivery of vital health services across sub-Saharan Africa. Many countries are also instituting or developing requirements for nurses and midwives to undergo CPD in order to renew their licence. CPD can help sustain important advancements in both pre-service education and the practice environment and ensure nurses and midwives who graduated prior to recent pre-service reforms are able to provide the same level of care as recent and future graduates. Countries could be supported in developing CPD modules that provide refresher training on ART and PMTCT regimens, teach new techniques for voluntary medical male circumcision and update practitioners on best practice guidelines.
For ECSA countries engaged in pre-service reform, accreditation of pre-service education is another important area for regulation strengthening. Accreditation criteria can be reviewed to ensure that nursing and midwifery programs include information on HIV and that PMTCT is integrated into maternal and child health curricula. Updated standards for education and accreditation that are applied across all institutions can increase the quality, relevancy and consistency of education in a country . This study found a variety of national, regional and international guidelines and standards used to formulate accreditation standards in ECSA countries, suggesting that harmonisation in the region may be challenging. However, there is a precedent for regional coordination of nursing education standards and licensure examinations; Europe and the Caribbean provide recent examples [37, 38].
By describing the nursing and midwifery regulation currently in place in the ECSA region, this study enhances our understanding of how strengthened regulatory frameworks can help sustain successful workforce strategies and achieve global health priorities. Limitations of this study include a potential selection bias due to the use of convenience sample as opposed to a representative sample. The absence of data from South Africa, a leader in nursing and midwifery practice and education, results in an incomplete description of regulation in the region. Because this study focused solely on nursing and midwifery regulations primarily in countries with a British tradition of health professional education and legislation, the findings cannot be generalised beyond nursing and midwifery in the ECSA region. More specific country-level information is needed on what capacity or resources might be required to modernise regulatory frameworks in the region and how to best support regulatory bodies to carry out key revisions. Future research should investigate the extent to which task shifting takes place and its alignment with local regulations, pre-service education and health policy. Additional studies could also focus on effective ways to facilitate and objectively measure progress in regulatory strengthening.
Reaching ambitious new targets for HIV/AIDS will require a continued commitment to strengthening the global health workforce. What is learned from the experiences of responding to HIV/AIDS can help improve the delivery of health services in a broad variety of health care settings. Integrating advancements to nursing and midwifery practice and education into national regulatory frameworks can help ensure the sustainability of these health workforce achievements. This study described the current state of nursing and midwifery regulations in 13 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and identified opportunities to strategically support countries in reviewing and revising regulations, such as scopes of practice, licensure, CPD and accreditation of pre-service institutions. Although we focused on ECSA, the findings have the potential to assist other countries and regions seeking to sustain successful workforce strategies through updated health professional regulation.
The authors acknowledge the representatives of the national nurses and midwives councils who donated their time and shared information on their nursing and midwifery regulations. The authors also acknowledge Alexandra Zuber of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who contributed important intellectual content.
This work was supported by the United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
All authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
CM drafted and revised the manuscript. JV, PV and PR contributed to the conception and design and made critical revisions. AV contributed to the interpretation of data and made critical revisions. MS contributed critical revisions to the manuscript for intellectual content.