PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Nerv Ment Dis. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 December 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3597771
NIHMSID: NIHMS417920

The Traumatology of Life

As Ground Zero was still smoldering and the frantic search for survivors continued, Charles Figley and Joseph Boscarino met nearby at 100 Avenue of the Americas in New York City to discuss studying the impact of the terrorist attacks which had occurred just days ago. The authors were no strangers to studying trauma survivors. Figley and Boscarino had collaborated since 1981 on efforts to understand PTSD and the consequences of combat on those who fought in the Vietnam War.

Boscarino had just started his new job two weeks earlier at the New York Academy of Medicine (NYAM) on Fifth Avenue and 103rd Street in Manhattan. On September 11 his PATH train from Hoboken, New Jersey, was one of the last to enter into the basement of the World Trade Center. He remembers going up the escalators from the basement to the main mezzanine level, which was extremely crowded that morning. He recalls heading to the subway tunnels at the end of the mezzanine and walking into the entrance to the C train, north-bound to 96th Street. At 8:46 AM and about 50 meters inside the C train tunnel, he heard a very loud metallic noise and felt a deep tremor on the subway platform.

Boscarino suspected a train derailment on one of the tracks. Thoughts of the 1993 World Trade Center attack ran through his mind as he boarded his uptown train. About 15 minutes or so later when he emerged from the subway tunnel at 96th Street and Central Park West, he entered a different world.

The word on 96th Street was that a plane had flown into one of the Twin Towers. A plane, he thought? About 10 minutes later as he entered the elevator at work, Jose, the operator, announced excitedly that a second plane had flown into the Twin Towers. Boscarino knew exactly what that meant and went to his office. After a few minutes of thought, he knew what to do. He needed to find his way out of Manhattan that morning and to call Charles Figley.

Charles Figley learned of the terrorist attacks on 9/11 after he and his wife, Kathy, attended their daughter Laura’s parent-teacher meeting at SAIL High School in Tallahassee, Florida. At the moment Boscarino was making his way to NYAM, Charles and Kathy were watching the attack on New York and Washington, DC in a state of shock and witnessed the first tower collapsing. They also knew immediately that their organization, Green Cross had better prepare for deployment of its members. Charles Figley was the founder and Kathy was the current director of Green Cross, a humanitarian organization that emerged as a response to the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Green Cross was mobilized immediately; the request for their services came at noon, Thursday, September 13th, within 48 hours of the attack1.

The Figleys flew from Tallahassee, Florida to New York City, through special “mercy flight” permission, because of the Green Cross mission to provide emergency mental health assistance to New Yorkers. It was beautiful flying weather on September 16th, just days after the terrorist attacks that caused so many deaths and pain in the heart of America. Green Cross traumatologists arrived in New York City on September 16, and were housed in the NY Sheraton, a crowded floor occupied primarily by NYU undergraduate students displaced from their dorms that were blocks from Ground Zero.

On Monday, September 17, 2001 the Green Cross began to assist the Services Employees International Union, Local 32BJ, staff and their blue-collar union members. Approximately 1,700 of their 9,000 members were working in and around the Twin Towers at the time (Figley & Figley, 2001).

Green Cross members, including those from Oklahoma City, were available to provide cutting edge services and positive and supportive words of consolation and hope. The training and certification of Green Cross (Figley, 2003) members were due, in part, to the publications like the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (JNMD) as well as Traumatology, the official journal of Green Cross. By 2001 the Green Cross and its members had learned much about how to effectively assess and treat those exposed to traumatic stressors and how best to prevent and manage those stressors, across many cultural and demographic contexts.

Purpose

The purpose here is to acknowledge the invaluable contributions about trauma provided to both trauma practitioners and researchers by such publications as JNMD. This article is a continuation of our recent paper (Boscarino & Figley, in press). We hope that these observations will help current and future scholars look beyond the data to the heart of the matter involving real people struggling with real trauma issues. The psychosocial and mental health knowledge acquired from the research stimulated by the September 11th terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC is extraordinary. But this work was built upon the knowledge available at the time of the attacks. Below we highlight some of this knowledge that includes the contributing role of this Journal.

The Emerging Interdisciplinary Field of Traumatology

More than anytime in its history traumatology is experiencing unparalleled interest by social scientists, practitioners, mental health policy makers, and the general public. This heightened interest provides a critical opportunity for trauma specialists to be part of the process of co-constructing the future of trauma research and practice.

Traumatology is the investigation and application of knowledge about the immediate and long-term consequences of highly stressful events and the factors that affect those consequences. This field emerged over the last twenty years, yet its origin can be traced to the earliest medical writings that discussed the symptoms and treatment of hysteria (Veith, 1965). Indeed, theories and explanations of traumatic stress symptoms are found throughout history. Ellenberger (1970), for example, noted that symptoms such as flashbacks, dissociation, and startle responses were variously viewed as acts of God, the gods, the devil, and various types of spirits. Scientific concepts began to replace religious ones during the latter portion of the 19th century with the invention of hypnotism, and the analysis of psychological possession and multiple personality (Azam, 1887; Flournoy, 1900; Hodgson, 1891). One of the most important innovations, though, was the work done at the La Salpetriere Hospital in Paris. There, Jean-Martain Charcot was the first to demonstrate that hysteria had psychological origins (Trimble, 1981).

Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, the study of trauma was incorporated within the established fields of mental health: psychiatry (e.g., Kardiner, 1941) and psychology (Grinker & Spiegel, 1946). This largely restrained the development of the emerging field. Investigators and innovative practitioners had to justify their work using the prevailing and limiting paradigms of their respective fields (Figley, 1978a). This began to change in the 1970s, in large part due to the American war in Vietnam and the war veterans who sought relief from their psychosocial and emotional scars. 2

The Trauma Journey of Charles Figley

Figley’s career as a traumatologist began as a war stress researcher, but his concern about the traumatized began as a war protester (1980d). As a teenage boy from the Heartland, the U.S. Marine Corps seemed to offer Figley an opportunity to establish his independence and to accelerate his progression towards adulthood. However, Figley soon discovered that the realities of combat in Vietnam offered only opportunities to survive until his military tour of duty was over. Years later Figley found myself camped out in the grassy Mall in the shadows of the U.S. Capital in Washington, D.C., surrounded by others who served in combat. Though they wore combat fatigues, their mission was to protest the ongoing war. It was April 1971 and the protesters were part of the Vietnam Veterans against the War. It was the largest protest against a war by those who fought it. Figley had driven down from Penn State University, where he was seeking his master of science degree in human development. On the final day of the protest, Figley and the others lined up and threw back the medals they had earned as veterans onto the steps of the Capital as a token of our opposition to the war in which they fought. It was a very emotional and memorable event.

Frustrated with the role of protester, Figley adopted a different approach. He chose to document what he observed among his fellow combat veterans. Figley started applying the principles of social action research suggested by Kurt Lewin (1946) at the end of WW II by demonstrating that the toll of war went far beyond the battlefield.

The next year (1972) Figley formed a clinical support group for war veterans who were students at the Bowling Green State University. As a member of the faculty, he provided guidance in both coping with university life and managing the post-war struggles with memories of battle and loss. Returning to Penn State for his Ph.D. program, Figley shifted from direct services and observations to library research. Two years later his bibliography of war-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was published in the Congressional Record.

Figley received an extraordinary number of requests for reprints and general inquiries about sharing resources after publication in the Congressional Record (Figley, 1975a). Due to this response, Figley established and served as coordinator of the Consortium on Veterans Studies in 1975; an association that included scores of other interested advocates, researchers, and scholars. At that time, the socio-emotional climate of the country was very different than it is today (Figley, 1980b; 1980c; 1980d). Over 7 million men and women were recently released from military service. Yet, the mental health fields barely recognized the plight of war-traumatized veterans. Burgess (1980) identified the same ignorance toward rape victims and victims of domestic violence during this period.

The first book published on what would later be called “ Posttraumatic Stress Disorder” was Stress Disorders among Vietnam Veterans (Figley, 1978a). The book focused on defining combat-related stress disorders; identifying the theoretical and clinical importance of the disorder to mental health professionals; explicating the long-term consequences of combat-related trauma; addressing the causes and consequences of the paucity of research in this area; providing clinical guidelines for working with the traumatized; and expanding the knowledge base of combat-related stress disorders, including psychosocial adjustments.

Though seminal, the book was only a stepping-stone toward the evolution of the field. It represented an important facet of this early phase in the development of the field of traumatology: social movements and social policy. The anti-war movement, the movement toward greater human rights for the Vietnam veteran, and the movements championing the rights of other neglected groups led to the concerted and frequently effective efforts to change social policy.

Stress Disorders among Vietnam Veterans (Figley, 1978a), was a byproduct of antiwar sentiment and was partly responsible for the U.S. Congress establishing the Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Counseling program, through Senate Bill 7 in 1979. The next year, the American Psychiatric Association published its third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (APA, 1980) that included, for the first time, PTSD. Shortly after that, the Veterans Administration established criteria for a service connected, psychiatric disability rating for PTSD. The first “Vet Center” (VA-sponsored outpatient mental health centers) opened in 1979 and by 1990, there were nearly 200 around the country (Blank, 1993).

The Figley book (Figley, 1978) was released at a good time. Almost overnight, the Federal government was spending millions of dollars to establish a national network of community centers to treat Vietnam War veterans and train the professionals necessary to work in them. This naturally led to a need for institutions and healthcare systems to address this new demand for trauma treatment and professional training.

The first training conference that focused on PTSD was held in St. Louis in 1979 and was sponsored by the U.S. Veterans Administration. The first non-government training conference was held in 1982 outside Cincinnati, Ohio, and was devoted not just to understanding and treating war-related PTSD but also the trauma from rape, domestic violence, accidents, and disasters.

Consistent with this broader trauma orientation was the emerging thesis about the post-adjustment problems of Vietnam War veterans. The “Post-Vietnam syndrome” thesis, most clearly articulated by Shatan (1975), suggested that combat veterans display the syndrome of symptoms due to unresolved guilt over killing Vietnamese, including innocent civilians, and their lack of support for their warrior status on the home front. Other trauma victims were thought to have undergone similar processes.

During this period of his career, Figley (1975a; 1975b; 1976a; 1976b; 1976c) spoke to a wide variety of audiences about the plight of the Vietnam veterans and the lack of appreciation, respect, and attention to their special mental health needs. As noted in the earliest publications on Vietnam veterans (Bourne, 1969; 1971; Figley, 1977; 1978a; Figley & Sprenkle, 1978; Leventman, 1978; Lifton, 1978), there was a substantial cost of war that had not been acknowledged. Few recognized then the enormous war-related psychosocial and emotional damages suffered by the war veterans, their families, and their communities.

It became clear to Figley, based on conversations and interviews with Vietnam veterans, that their syndrome had more similarities than differences with the stress syndromes associated with rape victims, Holocaust survivors, and other groups (Figley, 1978a). Figley first made the connection in 1975 when interviewing a disabled combat veteran in the veteran’s home in Illinois. The veteran noted that his mother had interfered with his plans to kill himself by disclosing that she had been raped while he was in Vietnam. She recognized that his symptoms of anger, sleep disturbances, flashbacks, and startle responses were connected to his experiences in Vietnam, because of her own rape-related symptoms. This revelation did not become obvious to Figley until a few years later when he was reviewing the research literature for his first book.3

One of the most important influences in the development of the concept of a traumatic stress syndrome common to combat veterans and other groups was Mardi Horowitz’s Stress Response Syndromes (1976). It provided the theoretical building blocks for Figley’s own emerging theory of the trauma induction-reduction process. Horowitz’s book, together with the works of other stress researchers (e.g., Bourne, 1969; Selye, 1956), enabled Figley to make the bridge between war-related traumatic stress and the distress of others who had been frightened by any one of a wide variety of highly stressful events. The more Figley looked the more obvious it became that fear and stress were the overriding concepts to understanding the response of the traumatized victim.

The Trauma Journey of Joseph Boscarino

In 1977 after completion of his PhD in social psychology from NYU, Joseph Boscarino moved his family to New Haven, Connecticut so he could complete a postdoctoral fellowship in Psychiatric Epidemiology at Yale University and the West Haven VA Medical Center. During this period Boscarino’s work focused on substance misuse among veterans and, in particular, Vietnam veterans (Boscarino, 1979; 1980; 1981a; 1981b). About this time Boscarino read Figley’s “stress disorders” book and began to focus on these disorders among veterans. In 1979 Boscarino left Yale for a research director position with Market Opinion Research (MOR) in Detroit, MI. MOR had just been awarded the first National Institute of Health (NIH) subcontract for the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. The ECA was the first population-based study of mental disorders in the community using the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Version III (DSM-III) criteria, as implemented in the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) (Robins, et al. 1981). Prior to this time, much psychiatric research was based on subjective assessments among limited population samples and by the use of mostly symptom scales typically focused on psychoneuroses, such as the MMPI scale. At about this time, Boscarino reached out to Figley about conducting a national study of Vietnam veterans using the new DIS interview. MOR had the technology and expertise to conduct such a study at the time. This made perfect sense to Boscarino and Figley, given their motivation and expertise.

Boscarino spent several months putting together nationa; “ECA” research team and writing a NIH grant, the first submitted to that organization to conduct a true national study of Vietnam veterans using the state-of-art DIS instrument. It was the first time Boscarino worked with Figley and soon they became good friends. But, the study was not funded due in part to reviewers who did not appreciate the physical and mental health problems being experienced by this cohort of veterans and because they thought that Boscarino and Figely lacked research experience.

In 1981, following that rejection Boscarino was forced to abandon his research and his Detroit employer and move to Chicago to find work in the healthcare marketing industry. However, just prior to that move, he was called in as a reviewer by NIH to review Bob Laufer’s Vietnam Legacy Study renewal application. At that time, the Legacy Study was considered one of the best studies of Vietnam veterans available (Boscarino, 2007a). Due to significant study measurement and sample issues, the NIH review committee was divided over further funding. Boscarino made the case that, while this study had limitations, it needed to be funded. There was no prospect of better Vietnam veteran studies in the foreseeable future. The NIH review team agreed with Boscarino and the rest is history (Frey-Wouters & Laufer, 1986). After that NIH review, Boscarino moved to the near North side of Chicago to start a research company downtown near Michigan Avenue, Allied Research Associates (ARA).

In 1990 after selling the shares of his Chicago company to the Gallop Organization and returning from a solo trip to Vietnam, he was thinking about getting back into academic research again. Then, just as he was leaving the Chicago Main Library in the Loop, a red book-jacket caught his attention. It was the summary report of the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study (NVVRS) and Figley was listed as a coauthor (Kulka et al., 1990). This resulted in Boscarino looking up his old friend, Figley the next day. While efforts to obtain the NVVRS data for secondary data analyses from Research Triangle Institute (the study contractor) ultimately failed, the Centers for Disease Control was more supportive and sent Boscarino the mainframe computer tapes for the Vietnam Experience Study (VES) in 1991 (Boscarino, 2007a). By 1992 Boscarino had moved to California to study epidemiology at Cal-Berkeley and the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF). In 1995 he had his first VES paper published (Boscarino, 1995). Many more were to follow (Boscarino, 2008a; 2008b; 2007a; 2007b; 2006a; 2006b; 2004; 1997; 1996; Boscarino & Figley, 2009; Boscarino, et al., 2009; Boscarino & Hoffman, 2007; Boscarino & Chang, 1999a; 1999b.).

Boscarino is a behavioral scientist and a medical epidemiologist, so he has a somewhat unique focus. Trained in social psychology at New York University and in epidemiology at Yale University and University of California, Berkeley, his research approach could be characterized as non-traditional, at least as a behavioral scientist trained in the 1970s. This combination explains in part his efforts to understand the biomedical impact of traumatic stress exposures for 30 years (Boscarino, 1979; 1980; 1981a; 1981b). This body of research has, among other things, confirmed the causative relationship between combat stress and stress-related medical problems. He won recently the highest honor given by the trauma field’s learned society (International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies - ISTSS): The Lifetime Achievement Award4 once called the “Pioneer Award until 1995.”

While research has confirmed that Vietnam combat veterans had higher rates of postwar adjustment difficulties (Boscarino, 2007a), when Dr. Boscarino examined the health status of Vietnam veterans in the community by posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), he found that PTSD-positive veterans had substantially higher rates of circulatory, nervous system, digestive, musculoskeletal, and respiratory diseases (Boscarino, 1997a). This was one of the first study to demonstrate this association among Vietnam veterans.

Dr. Boscarino also found that PTSD-positive veterans were significantly more likely to have had abnormal electrocardiograph (ECG) results post-service (28% vs. 14%), including a higher prevalence of myocardial (Q-wave) infarctions and atrioventricular conduction defects (Boscarino and Chang 1999a). Since coronary heart disease is considered an “inflammatory” disease, he also examined the immune status of community-based PTSD-positive veterans and found abnormally high white blood counts (>11,000/mm3) and T-cell counts (>2,640/mm3) (Boscarino and Chang 1999b).

Based on these findings, Boscarino examined whether PTSD-positive community-based veterans had a history of autoimmune diseases post-service, since there was clinical evidence supporting neuroendocrine and immune alterations in chronic PTSD cases. In particular, given the reduced cortisol levels he found among Vietnam combat veterans (Boscarino, 1996), he reasoned that a down-regulated glucocorticoid system might cause elevations in leukocyte and other immune inflammatory activities (Boscarino and Chang, 1999b). These autoimmune findings were consistent with these observations and recently published in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Boscarino, 2004). Boscarino found that veterans with PTSD, were more likely to have had post-service autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, insulin-dependent diabetes, and hypothyroidism (Boscarino, 2004).

Boscarino also found that veterans with complex PTSD also were more likely to have clinically higher T-cell counts, hyper-reactive immune responses on standardized delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity tests, and significantly lower dehydroepiandrosterone levels, suggesting that major alterations in neuroendocrinologic functions have likely occurred (Boscarino, 2004; Boscarino, 2007a).

Again, to our knowledge, this was one of the first studies to demonstrate these clinical associations, especially as this relates to heart and autoimmune diseases among a community-based sample of Vietnam veterans. He recently replicated his PTSD- rheumatoid arthritis results among veterans in the Vietnam Twin Registry using a co-twin study design, which suggests that this link is likely not due to genetic and/or childhood exposures, per se, but to PTSD onset specifically (Boscarino et al., 2010).

Mechanisms of Traumatic Stress Injuries

Following on the PTSD psychobiology work of Boscarino and others, there has been a call for replacing PTSD with a spectrum diagnosis of traumatic stress injury (Figley & Nash, 2007). Efforts to understand the effects of psychological trauma is to understand how memories are formed and maintained, since psychological trauma is about memory and memory management (Debiec & Ledoux, 2009; Verfaellie & Vasterling, 2009).

Recently Nash and Figley embarked on an interesting intellectual journey, picking up several colleagues along the way, including Jonathan Shay. The new stress injury paradigm they proposed has the potential of changing the way we quantify behavioral health following traumatic events and determining the treatment required to be more resilient. If correct, the new paradigm will help lead to discoveries that can predict a time-limited opportunity to treat the trauma injury to prevent a more chronic condition, including life-long PTSD, depression, substance abuse disorder, and all of the other co-occurring conditions noted. Rather than simply managing the injury through stress reduction/management programs, this new paradigm predicts the benefits of first “consolidating” the memories (Marshall & Born, 2007; Silvestri & Root, 2008) and then systematically eliminating the harmful emotional impact of these traumatizing memories through established exposure methods that change the emotional valence (from negative to neutral or positive) (cf, Sharma, Nargang, & Dickson, 2012).

Hostage-Related and Terrorism Trauma

In 1979 over 50 Americans were taken hostage in Iran and were held there for 444 days. Figley organized the Task Force on Families of Catastrophe to provide expert advice to the U.S. State Department on the handling of the hostage families. Among other things, the Task Force drew upon the extensive literature on POWs and their families (Figley, McCubbin & Spanier, 1981; Figley & McCubbin, 1983a). In addition, they cited important axioms from investigations of a 1974 robbery in Stockholm, Sweden. The “Stockholm Syndrome” (Strenz, 1982) was the phenomenon of a victim apparently falling in love with her captor (Ochberg, 1996). Extending this terrorism work, Frank Ochberg co-edited one of the first books on terrorism (Ochberg & Soskis, 1982). In addition, in England, a study was published showing that people not seriously harmed in a terrorist bombing were more incapacitated than would have been expected. This post-terrorism phenomenon was termed an “aftermath neurosis” (Sims, White, & Murphy, 1979)

Boscarino and colleagues made substantial and sustained contributions to September 11th studies, which were funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (Grant # R01-MH-66403 and R21-MH-086317) and other sponsors (Boscarino & Adams, 2009; 2008; Boscarino, et al., 2011a; 2011b; 2006a; 2006b; 2006c; 2006d; 2005; 2004a; 2004b; 2004c; 2003). Boscarino’s World Trade Center Disaster (WTCD) study was a prospective cohort study of 2,368 New York City (NYC) adults funded shortly after the September 11th attacks (Boscarino, et al., 2011b; 2004). The findings reported were based on a baseline survey conducted one year after the disaster and a follow-up conducted two years post-disaster.

One of the goals of this research was to assess the effectiveness of post-disaster treatments received by NYC residents following the attacks. Among the major findings of this study was the relatively small increase in mental health service utilization that occurred in the community post-disaster and that brief interventions shortly after the attack seemed to be highly effective (Boscarino & Adams, 2008, Boscarino, et al., 2011b). Specifically, those who received more conventional, longer-term post-disaster interventions, such as formal psychotherapy sessions and/or psychotropic medications, seemed to have poorer outcomes compared to those who received brief interventions shortly after the attacks (Boscarino, et al., 2011b). Since the Boscarino study was designed to assess treatment outcomes, used advanced measurement techniques, and incorporated matching to control for bias, these treatment finding were unexpected and raised clinical questions related to the effectiveness of treatments. Additional findings of this study were related to the impact of the disaster among minority group members, trauma exposure and alcohol abuse, and the onset and course of PTSD, as well as other findings (Boscarino, et al., 2011a; Boscarino & Adams, 2008; Boscarino & Adams, 2009a; Boscarino, et al., 2005).

Today this research effort continues through the development of the New York PTSD Risk Score (NYPRS), which is being used to predict the onset of PTSD among trauma-exposed populations, including Geisinger Clinic patients (Boscarino et al., 2012a; 2012b; 2012c; 2011c). Altogether, Boscarino’s WTCD work has resulted in over 45 scientific publications and represents one of the largest bodies of work in this field. Boscarino and his team are now using this knowledge together with his PTSD genetic work at Geisinger to develop the next generation of PTSD prediction models (Boscarino et al., 2012d; Boscarino & Figley, 2012).

Starting ISTSS and the Journal of Traumatic Stress

Due to the major social movements, shifts in social policy, and changes in psychiatric diagnoses discussed, efforts to bring various constituencies together was a matter of when and how, not if this would happen or not. The ingredients required to form the infrastructure of a field of study, initially called traumatic stress studies, were becoming increasingly available. All that was needed was a plan for integrating the various demands, perceived needs, and interested people. This began with an extension of an existing organization.

Figley recognized that he could use the resources of his Consortium on Veteran Studies to provide the critical, initial support to start the organization. However, he also knew that the constituency for a new field, organization, and scholarly journal must include but not be limited to veteran studies. Indeed, by bringing together a large number of scholars and practitioners who worked with a wide variety of traumatized populations, the unifying theories, concepts, assessment tools, and treatment approaches would likely evolve very quickly.

However, Figley and his colleagues reasoned that it was wise to first establish an organization to support a refereed, scholarly journal. A journal for traumatic stress studies would not only promulgate research findings about trauma but also report on promising assessment and treatment approaches. Based on his knowledge of publishing, he knew that publishers would not be interested unless there was a substantial subscription base that would be provided by an organization.

In 1983, Figley wrote to a large number of colleagues, including the current editor of this Journal (John A. Talbott) to propose the formation of the Society for Traumatic Stress Studies and the Journal of Traumatic Stress. The letter read, in part:

“I believe that an organization, tentatively titled the Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, would be a useful contribution. Moreover, that the central purpose of this Society would be to sponsor a scholarly publication, tentatively titled, Trauma and Its Wake: The Journal of the Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Such a journal would publish important advancements in the field of traumatic and post-traumatic stress. A distinguished Editorial Board is already in place in connection with the book I am editing, with the same primary title… . How appropriate is such a society and journal, in particular, and the emergence of a separate field of traumatic or post-traumatic stress in general?”.

The response to the author’s letter was positive and enthusiastic. He sent another memorandum the following year to the people, he had previously contacted, and finally, after the completion of Trauma and Its Wake (Figley, 1985a) and the birth of his daughter, Laura, in February 1985, he contacted the group to join him in Washington, D.C. for breakfast. He knew that those who were attending the annual conference of the National Organization for Victim Assistance would be available. The others lived either in or near Washington, D.C. At the breakfast meeting on March 2, 1985 the Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (STSS) was formally established. Those who attended comprised most of the Society’s Founding Board of Directors 5

It was agreed that the purpose of the Society would be: “to advance knowledge about the immediate and long-term human consequences of extraordinarily stressful events and to promote effective methods of preventing or ameliorating the unwanted consequences.” The objectives of the organization were to: 1) recognize achievement in knowledge production; 2) disseminate this knowledge through face-to-face contact with colleagues; and 3) make this information available through other knowledge transfer media, especially print media.

Figley proposed that the group be named a “society,” since the term connotes a learned group of like-minded colleagues. “Traumatic Stress Studies” was viewed as the name of the field at that time and represented, as reflected in the definition of the term traumatology at the start of this article, by the investigation and application of knowledge about the immediate and long-term consequences of highly stressful events and the factors, which affect those consequences (Figley, 1986a,b).

Final Thoughts

Much has been accomplished in the field of Traumatology over the last 20 years, but there is still much more to be done. Currently, the most neglected trauma populations are survivors of domestic violence (only recently have the traumatic consequences of their ordeal been discussed and studied), survivors of work-related trauma — especially among non-skilled jobs including but not limited to minors, migrant workers, and factory workers — and child survivors. Although there are publications about children, there is only limited research on children exposed to trauma, particularly very young children.

Though we know a lot about the neurophysiology, psychology, and psychobiology of trauma, we know very little about the systemic consequences of trauma. We need to know much more about how families, couples, parent-child and other family relationships are affected by trauma. Moreover, we need to know more about how groups — be they work groups, social groups, communities, or nations/cultures — are differentially affected by and recover from trauma over time.

The major obstacles to the development of the trauma field have been ignorance and fear. The ignorance lies in not being aware of the growing body of knowledge that supports the field. The fear is about fear itself, to paraphrase a former U.S. President. If we acknowledge that war traumatizes its combatants, then we must face that reality when committing our young to battle. If we acknowledge that a high percentage of U.S. females risk being sexually assaulted sometime in their lives and that the assault could cause lasting emotional wounds, then we must face that reality and prevent such assaults, etc. Social movements often force society to face and eliminate fear and ignorance. They typically strive for social justice. The traumatic stress movement is focused on prevention as well as mitigation of traumatic stress.

The future looks promising. There is a movement to insure that trauma-informed treatments including evidence-based practice is a standard of care for the traumatized. It is about time, because for too long the traumatized have suffered through waves of innovative interventions that are not appropriate for traumatized persons (Figley, 2002b).

Certainly it would be important to monitor the development in the emerging field of Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) and the discoveries that focus on trauma and stress; both traumatic and combat stress injuries (cf., Figley, Hall, & Nash, 2009). The development of promising assessment methods such as the New York PTSD Risk Score (Boscarino et al., 2012a; 2012b; 2012c; 2011c), enables us to study large numbers of medical and behavioral health records to determine who is most at risk and in need of treatment, as well as who is not.

There are promising diagnostic developments related to biomarker methods for assessment of behavioral health, including key biomarkers that can be now easily measured by quick, low cost saliva samples (Boscarino, et al., 2012d; Figley, Hall, & Nash, 2009). There should be greater emphasis away from psychopathology and more toward resilience and growth, especially in efforts to offset the negative consequences of the PTSD diagnosis.

Other promising areas include (a) developing neurologically-based interventions for memory management; (b) discovering the best biomarkers of both stress injuries and the risk for health conditions following trauma exposure; (c) recognizing the extraordinary impact of trauma on all aspects of peoples’ lives; (d) identifying underserved trauma populations, most notably children, the developmentally disabled, and the frail elderly; and, finally, (e) assessing the impact of early, brief interventions on the prevention of PTSD and the concomitant neurologic acceleration of fear extinction following treatment.

Conclusion

The 200th anniversary edition of the Journal is an opportunity to ponder the extraordinary developments in understanding human behavior and the variety of responses to trauma. Certainly the attack on New York and Washington, DC on September 11th in 2001 is an important date for those of us who study trauma, but it is hardly the first major event to occupy trauma investigators and practitioners. The authors have experienced trauma individually as people and as war veterans. More importantly, they have lived, studied, and published about the impact of trauma for more than 30 years.

Though these years of development, however, there was always a reference point for our work: those who experienced it and those who provided services to them. The Green Cross since its inception, for example, has provided pro bono services to the traumatized and, like other volunteer organizations focuses on post-disaster human services.

The attempt here was to point out the historic utility of JNMD, that helped prepare us for 9/11 and other major adversity in the world, but especially in the US. As a result, the field of Traumatology has emerged (together with the field of traumatic stress studies) as one of the fastest growing areas of both science and practice. All the major scholarly and mental health organizations have committed considerable resources to trauma-related matters over the past 20 years. This is paralleled by the increased interest in trauma among the general public. Yet remnants of the field can be found long ago in the first medical writings.

Figley and Boscarino’s journey as trauma scholars is similar as former Vietnam veteran warriors who returned, completed our education, and embarked on careers as professors and researchers. Their education and careers were shaped by their experiences in war.

The challenge of the field of Traumatology is to recognize that science, practice, policy, and social activism are linked and operate best when there is mutual appreciation for each. The roots of traumatology are deep and intimately associated with the psychological mechanisms of the human being, with all its complications and fears. The fruition of Traumatology, like the wisdom disseminated by the articles and reports in this Journal, are how we apply this understanding for ourselves, for our children, and for those who seek our help.

Acknowledgments

Funding: Support for Boscarino’s effort in writing this paper was provided, in part, by NIH Grant # R21-MH-086317, Boscarino, PI.

Footnotes

1Kathy was very familiar with major disasters and the need for Green Cross assistance. She served for many years with FEMA, the emergency management agency responsible for the Federal response to domestic disasters, and the State of Florida Disaster Operations.

2Other reviews provide the basis for these observations. Among the more useful ones are Scott’s (1993) historical-sociopolitical analysis; Figley’s (1978a) history of war trauma and his (Figley, 1988) article in the inaugural issue of the Journal of Traumatic Stress that asserts that the field of traumatic stress studies qualifies as a field of study; and Bloom’s (2000) discussion of the birth of ISTSS.

3The trauma literature, I would later discover, noted the many connections between war veterans’ adjustment problems and those of other groups (e.g., Krystal, 1968; Niederland, 1968).

4Lifetime Achievement Award

This award is the highest honor given by ISTSS. It is awarded to the individual who has made great lifetime contributions to the field of traumatic stress. Winners are among the most celebrated scholars of their time: 2011 Mark Creamer, PhD; 2010 Joseph A. Boscarino, PhD, MPH; 2009 Roger K. Pitman, MD; 2008 Dean Kilpatrick, PhD; 2007 Arieh Shalev, MD; 2006 Louis Crocq, MD, PhD; 2005 William Yule, PhD; 2004 Terence M. Keane, PhD; 2003 Frank Ochberg, MD; 2002 Yael Danieli, PhD; 2001 Robert S. Pynoos, MD, MPH; 2000 Robert Ursano, MD; 1999 Matthew Friedman, MD, PhD; 1998 Bessel van der Kolk, MD; 1997 Edna Foa, PhD; 1996 Judith L. Herman, MD; 1995 Lars Weisaeth, MD; 1994 Charles R. Figley PhD; 1993 Ann Burgess, DNSc; 1992 Henry Krystal, MD; 1991 Lawrence C. Kolb; 1990 William Niederland; 1989 Leo Eitinger, MD; 1988 James Titchener, MD; 1987 Beverly Raphael, MD; 1986 Mardi J. Horowitz, MD; 1985 Robert Jay Lifton, MD.

5Those attending the meeting became members of the Founding Board of Directors: Ann Burgess (Vice President), Yael Danieli, Charles Figley (President), Bernard Mazel, Robert Rich (Secretary/Treasurer), and Marlene Young. Scott Sheely was selected as Executive Director.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Revision. Washington, D.C: Author; 1980.
  • Askevold F. The war sailor syndrome. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 1976;77(27):133–138. [PubMed]
  • Azam EE. Hypnotsme, double conscience et alteration de la personalite. Paris: Balliere; 1887.
  • Bard M, Sangrey D. The crime victim’s book. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1979.
  • Bard M, Shellow R. Issues in law enforcement: Essays and case studies. Reston VA: Reston Publishing Company; 1976.
  • Bastiaans J. The KZ-syndrome: A thirty-year study of the effects on victims of Nazi concentration camps. Revue de Medecine et Chirurgie. 1974;78:573–580. [PubMed]
  • Bloom SL. Our hearts and our hopes are turned to peace: Origins of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. In: Shalev A, Yehuda R, McFarlane S, editors. International handbook of trauma and violence. New York: Plenum; 2000. pp. 27–50.
  • Blank AS. Vet Centers: A new paradigm in delivery of services for victims and survivors of traumatic stress. In: Wilson JP, Raphael B, editors. International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes. New York: Plenum; 1993. pp. 915–924.
  • Boman B. Behavioral observations on the Granville train disasters and the significance of stress for psychiatry. Social Science and Medicine. 1979;13:463–471. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. A Prospective study of PTSD and early-age heart disease mortality among Vietnam veterans: implications for surveillance and prevention. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2008a;70:668–676. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Psychobiologic predictors of disease mortality after psychological trauma: Implications for research and clinical surveillance. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2008b;196:100–107. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. The Postwar Experiences and Health Outcomes of Vietnam Veterans. In: Fink G, editor. Encyclopedia of Stress. 2. Vol. 3. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2007a. pp. 830–838.
  • Boscarino JA. The Mortality impact of combat stress 30 years after exposure. In: Figley C, Nash WP, editors. Combat Stress Injuries: Theory, Research and Treatment. Vol. 97. New York, NY: Routledge; 2007b. p. 117.
  • Boscarino JA. External-cause mortality after psychologic trauma: the effects of stress exposure and predisposition. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2006a;47:503–14. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Posttraumatic stress disorder and mortality among U.S. Army veterans 30 years after military service. Annals of Epidemiology. 2006b;16:248–56. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Association between posttraumatic stress disorder and physical illness: Results and implications from clinical and epidemiologic studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004;1032:141–153. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Diseases among men 20 years after exposure to severe stress: Implications for clinical research and medical care. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997;59:605–614. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Post-traumatic stress disorder, exposure to combat, and lower plasma cortisol among Vietnam veterans: Findings and clinical implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1996;64:191–201. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA. Post-traumatic stress and associated disorders among Vietnam veterans: The significance of combat exposure and social support. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1995;8:317–336. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino J. Patterns of alcohol use among veterans and nonveterans: A confirmation of previous findings. American Journal of Public Health. 1981a;71:85–88. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino J. Current excessive drinking among Vietnam veterans: A comparison with other veterans and nonveterans. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 1981b;27:204–222. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino J. Drinking by veterans and nonveterans: A national comparison. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1980;41:954–960. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino J. Current drug abuse among Vietnam and non-Vietnam veterans. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1979;6:301–312. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Elich PM, Hoffman SN, Zhang X. Higher FKBP5, COMT, CHRNA5 and CRHR1 allele burdens are associated with PTSD and Interact with trauma exposure: Implications for neuropsychiatric research and treatment. Neuropsychiatric Research and Treatment. 2012d;8:131–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Figley CR. Understanding the neurobiology of fear conditioning and emergence of PTSD psychobiology: Commentary on Blanchard et al. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2012;200 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Forsberg CW, Goldberg J. A twin study of the association between PTSD symptoms and rheumatoid arthritis. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2010;72:481–486. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Kirchner HL, Hoffman SN, Sartorius J, Adams RE, Figley CR. The New York PTSD Risk Score for assessment of psychological trauma: Male and female versions. Psychiatry Research. 2012a;189 in press. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Kirchner HL, Hoffman SN, Sartorius J, Adams RE, Figley CR. Predicting future PTSD using a modified New York Risk Score: Implications for patient screening and management. Minerva Psichiatrica. 2012c;53:47–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Kirchner HL, Hoffman SN, Sartorius J. Use of the New York PTSD Risk Score to predict PTSD: Current and future research efforts. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2012b;34:317–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Kirchner HL, Hoffman SN, Sartorius J, Adams RE, Figley CR. A brief screening tool for assessing psychological trauma in clinical practice: Development and validation of the New York PTSD Risk Score. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2011c;33:489–500. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Kirchner HL, Hoffman SN, Sartorius J, Adams RE. PTSD and Alcohol use after the World Trade Center attacks: A longitudinal study. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2011a;24:515–525. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Figley CR. Mental health service use after the World Trade Center disaster: Utilization trends and comparative effectiveness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2011b;199:91–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE. PTSD onset and course following the World Trade Center Disaster: findings and Implications for future research. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2009a;44:887–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE. Peritraumatic panic attacks and health outcomes two years after psychological trauma: implications for intervention and research. Psychiatry Research. 2009b;167:139–150. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE. Overview of findings from the World Trade Center Disaster Outcome Study: recommendations for future research after exposure to psychological trauma. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health. 2008;10:275–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Figley CR, Galea S, Foa EB. Fear of terrorism and preparedness in New York City 2 years after the attacks: implications for disaster planning and research. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2006a;12:505–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Figley CR. Worker productivity and outpatient service use after the September 11th attacks: Results from the New York City Terrorism Outcome Study. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2006b;49:670–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Foa EB, Landrigan PJ. A propensity score analysis of brief worksite crisis interventions after the World Trade Center disaster: Implications for intervention and research. Medical Care. 2006c;44:454–462. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Galea S. Alcohol use in New York after the terrorist attacks: a study of the effects of psychological trauma on drinking behavior. Addictive Behavior. 2006d;31:606–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Stuber J, Galea S. Disparities in mental health treatment following the World Trade Center disaster: Implications for mental health care and health services research. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2005;18:287–297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Adams RE, Figley CR. Mental health service Use 1-year after the World Trade Center disaster: Implications for mental health care. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2004a;26:346–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Galea S, Adams RE, Ahern J, Resnick H, Vlahov D. Mental health service and psychiatric medication use in New York City after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack. Psychiatric Services. 2004b;55:274–283. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Figley CR, Adams RE, Galea S, Resnick H, Fleischman AR, Bucuvalas M, Gold J. Adverse reactions of study persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2004c;192:515–524. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, Vlahov D. Psychiatric medication use among Manhattan residents following the World Trade Center disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2003;16:301–306. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Figley CR. The impact of repression, hostility, and post-traumatic stress disorder on all-cause mortality: A prospective 16-year follow-up. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2009;197:461–466. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Erlich PM, Hoffman SN. Low serum cholesterol and external-cause mortality: potential implications for research and surveillance. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2009;43:848–854. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Hoffman SN. Consistent association between mixed lateral preference and PTSD: confirmation among a national study of 2490 US Army Vietnam veterans. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2007;69:365–9. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Chang J. Electrocardiogram abnormalities among men with stress-related psychiatric disorders: Implications for coronary heart disease and clinical research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999a;21:227–234. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino JA, Chang J. Higher abnormal leukocyte and lymphocyte counts 20 years after exposure to severe stress: Research and clinical implications. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1999b;61:378–386. [PubMed]
  • Boscarino J, Figley CR. Alcohol abuse and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Vietnam veterans: A possible link. Sociological Abstracts 1981
  • Bourne PG. The psychology and physiology of stress. New York: Academic Press; 1969.
  • Bourne PG. From boot camp to My Lai. In: Falk R, Kolko G, Lifton R, editors. Crimes of war. New York: Random House; 1971.
  • Burgess AW, Groth AN, Holmstrom LL, Sgroi SM. Sexual assault of children and adolescents. New York: Lexington Books; 1978.
  • Burgess AW, Holstrom L. Rape trauma syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1974;131:981–986. [PubMed]
  • Burton I, Kates RW, White GF. The environment as hazard. New York: Oxford University Press; 1978.
  • Dohrenwend BP, Dohrenwend BS, Warheit GJ, Bartlett GS, Goldsteen RL, Goldsteen K, Martin JL. Stress in the community: A report to the President’s Commission on the Accident at Three Mile Island. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1981;365:159–174. [PubMed]
  • Eitinger L. The symptomatology of mental disease among refugees in Norway. Journal of Mental Science. 1960;106:947–966. [PubMed]
  • Eitinger L. Pathology of the concentration camp syndrome. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1961;5:371–379. [PubMed]
  • Eitinger L. Concentration camp survivors in Norway and Israel. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 1964. [PubMed]
  • Ellenberger HF. The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books; 1970.
  • Erickson K. Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1976.
  • Eth S, Pynoos R, editors. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in children. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 1985.
  • Farberow NL. A training manual for human service workers in major disasters. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976.
  • Figley CR. Interpersonal adjustment and family life among Vietnam veterans, a general bibliography. 1975a Feb 19; Congressional Record (Entered by Senator Vance Hartke)
  • Figley CR. The returning veteran and interpersonal adjustment: A review of the research; 1975b, August; Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations; Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Figley CR. Contrasts between combat and noncombat Vietnam veterans regarding selected indices of interpersonal adjustment. 1975c, August; Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association; San Francisco, CA.
  • Figley CR. Symptoms of delayed combat stress among a college sample of Vietnam veterans. 1976a, March; Invited paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Personnel and Guidance Association; Chicago, MI.
  • Figley CR. The immediate and long-term emotional consequences of war-related trauma; 1976b, June; Invited presentation at the Center for POW Studies.
  • Figley CR. An overview of the research related to delayed combat stress among Vietnam veterans; 1976c, September; Paper presented at a symposium at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association; Washington, D.C.
  • Figley CR, editor. Stress Disorders among Vietnam Veterans: Theory, Research, and Treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978a.
  • Figley CR. Introduction. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978b. pp. 57–70.
  • Figley CR. Psychosocial adjustment among Vietnam veterans: An overview of the research. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978c. pp. 57–70.
  • Figley CR. Separating fact from fiction: The emotional toll of service in Vietnam; 1978d, September; Invited presentation at the meeting of the American Psychological Association; Toronto, Canada.
  • Figley CR. Strangers at home: The war, the nation, and the Vietnam veteran. Invited address at North Dakota University; Grand Forks, North Dakota: 1978e. Nov,
  • Figley CR. Confusing the warrior with the war. American Psychological Association Monitor; 1979a. Mar, p. 2. Editorial.
  • Figley CR. The Spartans and the Spartacans: The Vietnam veteran experience in social-historical perspective; 1979b, April; Invited presentation at Wabash College; Crawfordsville, Indiana.
  • Figley CR. The nature of disasters: Implications for the Vietnam veteran and the nation; 1979c, May; Invited speech at the Annual Indiana Optimist Club Meeting.
  • Figley CR. Catastrophic stress reactions in Vietnam veterans; 1979d, May; Paper presented at George Washington University Medical School and VAMC; Washington, D.C..
  • Figley CR. Stress and the family: Implications for new conceptualizations; 1979e, August; Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations; Boston, MA.
  • Figley CR. Progress: Awards for outstanding achievement in veteran studies; 1979f, September; Annual meeting of the Consortium on Veteran Studies; New York. American Psychological Association;
  • Figley CR. Delayed combat stress disorder (PTSD): Some political implications; 1979g, October; Invited address at the annual meeting of the American Association of Minority Program Administrators; Miami Beach, Florida.
  • Figley CR. The secondary explosions of the Vietnam war: Vietnam veterans in mainstream America. Invited address at Calumet College; 1979h. Dec,
  • Figley CR. The glory and the gore: An introduction to Section I: The war and the warrior. In: Figley CR, Leventman S, editors. Strangers at home: Vietnam veterans since the war. New York: Preager; 1980a. pp. 3–8.
  • Figley CR. Confused, hated, ignored, and dishonored: An introduction to Section II, the returning veteran. In: Figley CR, R C, Leventman S, editors. Strangers at home: Vietnam veterans since the war. New York: Preager; 1980b. pp. 109–114.
  • Figley CR. Unpaid debts to unsung heroes: An introduction to Section III, government policies and the veteran. In: Figley CR, R C, Leventman S, editors. Strangers at home: Vietnam veterans since the war. New York: Preager; 1980c. pp. 251–256.
  • Figley CR. A postscript: Welcoming home the strangers. In: Figley CR, Leventman S, editors. Strangers at home: Vietnam veterans since the war. New York: Preager; 1980d.
  • Figley CR. Welcoming back the Vietnam veteran survivor: Review and application of PTSD; 1980e, May; Presented at the 133rd Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; San Francisco, CA.
  • Figley CR. The Iranian crisis: Caring for families of catastrophe. American Association for Family Therapy Newsletter. 1980f Sep;11
  • Figley CR. The Vietnam veteran experience; 1980g, November; Invited presentation at the VA Medical Center; Minneapolis.
  • Figley CR. The Vietnam veteran in the context of the family. Invited lectures, Washburn University; Topeka, Kansas: 1981a. Mar,
  • Figley CR. Working on a theory of what it takes to survive. American Psychological Association Monitor. 1981b Mar;12:9.
  • Figley CR. Historical overview of society’s treatment of American veterans since the revolutionary war. Invited address at Indiana State University; Evansville, Indiana: 1981c. May,
  • Figley CR. Post-traumatic stress disorders: Models and applications for individuals and families. Invited address at Princeton University; Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs: 1982. Jan,
  • Figley CR. Letter to Colleagues. 1983a Nov 11;
  • Figley CR. Catastrophes: An overview of family reactions. In: Figley CR, McCubbin HI, editors. Stress and the family, Volume II: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983b. pp. 3–20.
  • Figley CR. Final Report of the Task Force on families of catastrophe. In: Figley CR, McCubbin HI, editors. Stress and the family, Volume II: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983c. pp. 197–226.
  • Figley CR, editor. Trauma and its wake: The student and treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1985a.
  • Figley CR. From victim to survivor: Social responsibility in the wake of catastrophe. In: Figley CR, editor. Trauma and its wake: The student and treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1985b. pp. 298–416.
  • Figley CR. History. Stresspoints. 1986a;1(1):2.
  • Figley CR. Trauma and its wake, Volume two: Traumatic stress theory, research, and integration. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1986b.
  • Figley CR. Forward. In: Wilson JP, Raphael B, editors. The International Handbook of Traumatic Stress Syndromes. New York: Plenum; 1993. pp. xvii–xx.
  • Figley CR, editor. Treating Compassion Fatigue. NY: Brunner/Routledge; 2002a.
  • Figley CR, editor. Brief Treatments for the Traumatized. Westport, CT: Greewood Press; 2002b.
  • Figley CR, Hall N, Nash WP. Combat stress injuries: Toward a psychoneuroimmunological model for research, treatment, and prevention. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2009;23:S36.
  • Figley CR, Leventman S. Strangers at home: Vietnam veterans since the war. New York: Preager; 1980.
  • Figley CR, McCubbin HI. Stress and the family, Volume II: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983a.
  • Figley CR, McCubbin HI. Introduction. In: Figley CR, McCubbin HI, editors. Stress and the family, Volume II: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983b. pp. Xix–xxvi.
  • Figley CR, McCubbin HI, Spanier G. the Task Force on Families of Catastrophe. Report of the Task Force on Families of Catastrophe to the U. S. State Department regarding the treatment of the Americans held hostage in Iran and their families. Presented to the Department of State; Washington, D.C: 1980. Feb,
  • Figley CR, Robertson M, Lester G, Ross K. The relationship between life changes and family-related anxiety among returned POWs; 1976, November; Paper presented at the 4th Department of Defense Meeting on the POW; San Diego, CA.
  • Figley CR, Smith S. Disasters and traumatic stress reactions of families; 1981, October; Invited presentation at the annual training conference of the American Red Cross, Indiana Chapter; Vincennes, Indiana.
  • Figley CR, Southerly WT. Residue of war: The Vietnam veteran in mainstream America; 1977, August; Paper presented at a symposium at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association; San Francisco, California.
  • Figley CR, Salison S. Treating the veteran as a survivor. Evaluation and Change. 1980:135–141.
  • Figley CR, Sprenkle DH. Delayed stress response syndrome: Family therapy implications. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling. 1978;4:53–60.
  • Finkelhor D. Sexually victimized children. New York: The Free Press; 1979.
  • Finkelhor D. Introduction. In: Briere J, Berliner L, Bulkley JA, Jenny C, Reid T, editors. The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications; 1996. pp. ix–xiii.
  • Gelles RJ, Straus MA. Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In: Burr WR, Hill R, Nye FI, editors. Contemporary theories about the family. New York: Free Press; 1979. pp. 549–581.
  • Gleser G, Green BL, Winget C. Prolonged psychosocial effects of disaster: A study of Buffalo Creek. New York: Academic Press; 1981.
  • Flournoy T. A study of a case of glossolalia. NY: Harper; 1900.
  • Grinker RR, Spiegel JP. War neuroses in North Africa: The Tunisian Campaign. NY: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation; 1943.
  • Grinker RR, Spiegel JP. The management of neuropsychiatric casualties in the zone of combat Manual of military neuropsychiatry. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1944.
  • Herman JL. Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books; 1992.
  • Hodgson R. A cs [case] of double consciousness In proceedings of the Society of Psychical Research. London: Edward Arnold; 1891.
  • Hogencamp V, Figley CR. War-related stress. In: Figley CR, McCubbin HI, editors. Stress and the family, Volume II: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1983. pp. 148–165.
  • Horowitz MJ. Stress response syndromes. New York: Jason Aronson; 1976.
  • Kardiner A. The traumatic neuroses of war. New York: Paul B Hoeber; 1941.
  • Kinzie JD. Lessons from cross-cultural psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1978;32:110–120.
  • Krystal H. Massive psychic trauma. New York: International Universities Press; 1968.
  • Leventman S. Epilogue: Social and historical perspectives on the Vietnam veteran. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978. pp. 291–295.
  • Lewin Kurt. Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues 2. 1946:34–46.
  • Lifton RJ. Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: Basic Books; 1967.
  • Lifton RJ. Home from the war. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
  • Lifton RJ. Advocacy and corruption in the healing profession. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978. pp. 209–230.
  • Lifton RJ, Olson E. The human meaning of total disaster: The Buffalo Creek Experience. Psychiatry. 1976;39:1–18. [PubMed]
  • Lin KM, Tozuma L, Masuda M. Adaptional problems of Vietnamese refugees. Archives of General Psychology. 1979;36:955–961. [PubMed]
  • Malt UF, Schnyder U, Weisaeth L. ICD-10 Mental and behavioral consequences of traumatic stress. In: Mak FL, Nadelson CC, editors. International Review of Psychiatry. Vol. 2. Washington, D. C: American Psychiatric Press; 1996. pp. 151–176.
  • Neff L. Traumatic neurosis; 1975, May; Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association; CA.
  • Niederland WG. Clinical observations on the “survivor syndrome” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis. 1968;49:313–315. [PubMed]
  • Ochberg F. The victim of terrorism: Psychiatric considerations. Terrorism. 1978;1(2):147–168.
  • Ochberg F. Post-traumatic therapy and victims of violence. In: Ochberg F, editor. Post-traumatic therapy and victims of violence. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1988a. pp. 3–19.
  • Ochberg F. The victim of war and atrocity. In: Ochberg F, editor. Post-traumatic therapy and victims of violence. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1988b. pp. 225–226.
  • Ochberg F, Soskis DA, editors. Victims of terrorism. Boulder: Westview Press; 1982.
  • Parker G. Cyclone Tracy and Darwin evacuees: On the restoration of the species. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1977;130:548–555. [PubMed]
  • Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR. Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology. 1977;3:23–49.
  • Raphael B. Bereavement and prevention. New Doctor. 1977;4:41–45.
  • Raphael B, Maddison DC. Care of bereaved adults: Modern trends. In: Hill OW, editor. Psychosomatic medicine – 3. London: Butterworth; 1976. pp. 491–506.
  • Rich RF. Evaluating mental health services for victims: Perspectives on policies and services in the United States. In: Salasin SE, editor. Evaluating victim services. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981. pp. 128–142.
  • Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1981;38(4):381–389. [PubMed]
  • Salasin SE, editor. Evaluating victim services. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1981.
  • Scott W. PTSD in DSM-III: A case in the politics of diagnosis and disease. Social Problems. 1990;37(3):294–310.
  • Scott W. The politic of readjustment: Vietnam veterans since the war. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter; 1993.
  • Sharma AV, Nargang FE, Dickson CT. Neurosilence: Profound Suppression of Neural Activity following Intracerebral Administration of the Protein Synthesis Inhibitor Anisomycin. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012;32(7):2377–2387. [PubMed]
  • Shatan C. Through the membrane of reality: “Impacted grief” and perceptual dissonance in Vietnam combat veterans. Psychiatric Opinion. 1974;11(6):6–15.
  • Shatan C. War babies: Delayed impact of war-making, persecution, and disaster on children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1975;45:289.
  • Shatan C. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: The emotional context of combat continues. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978. pp. 43–52.
  • Sims ACP, White AC, Murphy T. Aftermath neurosis: Psychological sequelae of the Birmingham bombings in victims not seriously injured. Medicine, Science and the Law. 1979;19:78–81. [PubMed]
  • Solomon Z. Oscillating between denial and recognition of PTSD: Why are lessons learned and forgotten? Journal of Traumatic Stress Studies. 1995;8(2):271–282. [PubMed]
  • Stanton MD, Figley CR. Treating the Vietnam veteran within the family system. In: Figley CR, editor. Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans: Theory, research and treatment. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1978. pp. 281–290.
  • Steiner M, Neumann M. Traumatic neurosis and social support in the Yom Kippur war returnees. Military Medicine. 1978;143:866–868. [PubMed]
  • Straus MA. Sociological perspective on the prevention and treatment of wife-beating. In: Roy M, editor. Battered women: A psychological study of domestic violence. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1977.
  • Strenz T. The Stockholm Syndrome. In: Ochberg F, Soskis D, editors. Victims of terrorism. Boulder: Westview; 1982. pp. 149–164.
  • Stretch RH, Figley CR. Combat and the Vietnam veteran: Assessment of psychosocial adjustment. Armed Forces and Society. 1984;10(2):311–319. [PubMed]
  • Terr L. Children of Chowchilla: A study of psychic trauma. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 1979;34:552–623. [PubMed]
  • Terr L. Treating psychic trauma in children: A preliminary discussion. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 1989;2(1):3–20.
  • Thygesen P, Hermann K, Willanger R. Concentration camp survivors in Denmark. Persecution, disease, disability, compensation. A 23 year follow-up. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1970;17:65–108. [PubMed]
  • Titchner J, Kapp FT. Family and character change at Buffalo Creek. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1976;143:1443–1446.
  • Veith I. Hysteria: The history of a disease. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1965.
  • Walker L. The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row; 1979.
  • Wilkinson CB, Vera E. The management and treatment of disaster victims. Psychiatric Annals. 1985;15:174–184.
  • Wilson JP, Raphael B. International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes. New York: Plenum Press; 1993.
  • Frey-Wouters E, Laufer RS. Legacy of a war: The American soldier in Vietnam. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, Inc; 1986.
  • Young M. The crime victim’s movement. In: Ochberg F, editor. Post-traumatic therapy and victims of violence. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1988. pp. 319–329.