PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jvirolPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJV ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Virol. Mar 2013; 87(6): 3108–3118.
PMCID: PMC3592176
Identification of the N-Terminal Domain of the Influenza Virus PA Responsible for the Suppression of Host Protein Synthesis
Emily A. Desmet,* Kendra A. Bussey,* Raychel Stone, and Toru Takimotocorresponding author
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Address correspondence to Toru Takimoto, toru_takimoto/at/urmc.rochester.edu.
*Present address: Emily A. Desmet, Baker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; Kendra A. Bussey, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Received October 9, 2012; Accepted December 23, 2012.
Cellular protein synthesis is suppressed during influenza virus infection, allowing for preferential production of viral proteins. To explore the impact of polymerase subunits on protein synthesis, we coexpressed enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) or luciferase together with each polymerase component or NS1 of A/California/04/2009 (Cal) and found that PA has a significant impact on the expression of eGFP and luciferase. Comparison of the suppressive activity on coexpressed proteins between various strains revealed that avian virus or avian-origin PAs have much stronger activity than human-origin PAs, such as the one from A/WSN/33 (WSN). Protein synthesis data suggested that reduced expression of coexpressed proteins is not due to PA's reported proteolytic activity. A recombinant WSN containing Cal PA showed enhanced host protein synthesis shutoff and induction of apoptosis. Further characterization of the PA fragment indicated that the N-terminal domain (PANt), which includes the endonuclease active site, is sufficient to suppress cotransfected gene expression. By characterizing various chimeric PANts, we found that multiple regions of PA, mainly the helix α4 and the flexible loop of amino acids 51 to 74, affect the activity. The suppressive effect of PANt cDNA was mainly due to PA-X, which was expressed by ribosomal frameshifting. In both Cal and WSN viruses, PA-X showed a stronger effect than the corresponding PANt, suggesting that the unique C-terminal sequences of PA-X also play a role in suppressing cotransfected gene expression. Our data indicate strain variations in PA gene products, which play a major role in suppression of host protein synthesis.
Influenza A viruses remain a significant public health threat. During a typical year, seasonal epidemics result in at least 36,000 deaths in the United States alone (1). Typically, infection with seasonal influenza virus often presents as a mild infection. Periodically, however, pandemics arise, resulting in severe morbidity and mortality within the population. In the case of highly pathogenic influenza A viruses, such as avian H5N1, infection is often associated with severe tissue destruction and dysregulated immune responses (2). Factors that contribute to increased pathogenicity following human infection with avian viruses are not well understood.
Influenza virus infection results in the rapid decline of host protein synthesis, a process referred to as shutoff (3, 4). Inhibition of cellular protein synthesis is expected to aid in dampening the antiviral response, which could be a major factor for efficient viral spread and pathogenicity. Therefore, it is no surprise that influenza viruses have adopted exquisitely complex methods for inducing shutoff during infection. It is not known which viral proteins are responsible for host protein synthesis shutoff. Several groups have shown that NS1 inhibits alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) synthesis (5, 6) and interferes with nuclear export and stability of cellular mRNAs (79), while enhancing the efficiency with which viral mRNAs are translated (10, 11). However, analysis of influenza-induced shutoff using a virus lacking NS1 expression showed that NS1 was not required for the inhibition of host protein synthesis, suggesting that other viral factors are involved in shutoff (12). More recently, several observations in the field have suggested a role for the polymerase complex in host protein synthesis shutoff, based upon the observation that cellular RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is degraded following infection. The viral polymerase complex binds to the C-terminal domain, in particular the active phosphoserine form, of the large subunit of RNAPII (13). Artificial expression of the polymerase complex is associated with degradation of the inactive unphosphorylated form of RNAPII. Inactive RNAPII is similarly degraded in cells expressing the PA subunit in the absence of PB1 and PB2, indicating that a PA-dependent activity is responsible for the observed degradation. However, ubiquitination of the accumulating transcriptionally active form of RNAPII is dependent on the binding of PB2 to RNAPII, suggesting that the full polymerase complex is required for the inhibition of host transcription that is associated with a loss of a functional RNAPII (14, 15). Other studies have suggested a contribution of PA to shutoff based on the ability of PA to induce proteolysis. PA expression was reported to induce the degradation of coexpressed proteins (16). However, it is unclear if the proteolytic activity of PA is sufficient for shutoff, as the PA T157A mutation, which reduces proteolysis, has no effect on viral induction of shutoff (14, 17). This suggests that other functions of PA, or other targets, contribute to host protein synthesis shutoff. Interestingly, a new viral protein, PA-X, was recently found to be produced from the PA gene by ribosomal frameshifting (18). PA-X was shown to repress cellular gene expression and modulate viral virulence and the global host response, suggesting that an additional PA gene product contributes to the regulation of the host response upon viral infection.
In this study, we evaluated the impact of polymerase subunits on influenza-induced host protein synthesis shutoff. We show that expression of influenza virus PA, but not PB1, PB2, or NS1, resulted in decreased protein expression from cotransfected cDNAs. Interestingly, PA genes of avian virus origin, such as those from A/California/04/2009 (Cal), were more potent in shutoff of protein synthesis than those from the human viruses tested, including A/WSN/33 (WSN). The enhancement phenotype associated with avian-origin PA was also observed during viral infection with a recombinant WSN virus expressing the PA gene from Cal. The efficient shutoff observed in the presence of avian-origin PA correlated with a sharp increase in apoptotic cell death. Interestingly, expression of the N-terminal 257 residues was sufficient to induce shutoff, and further analysis using chimeric constructs identified a region in the N-terminal domain responsible for the different shutoff activity. Finally, we detected a similar difference in the shutoff activities of the recently identified PA-X proteins of WSN and Cal. Taken together, these observations indicate a major involvement of PA gene products in nonviral protein synthesis shutoff, which may contribute to viral evasion of the host's antiviral activity.
Viruses and cultured cells.
A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) (Cal) and A/chicken/Nanchang/3-120/01 (H3N2) (Nan) were generously provided by R. Webster and R. Webby (St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN). A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) (NC) was generously provided by A. Sant (University of Rochester). A/WSN/33 (H1N1) (WSN) was rescued from cDNAs generously provided by Y. Kawaoka (University of Wisconsin, Madison). All viruses were propagated in MDCK cells. 293T, A549, and MDCK cells were maintained at 37°C and DF-1 cells were maintained at 39°C in 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 8% fetal calf serum (FCS).
Antibodies.
Anti-Flag M2 (200472) and anti-β-actin (AC-15) antibodies were purchased from Agilent Technologies and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. The anti-influenza A virus PA concentrated culture supernatant (clone 2C3-C10) was generated in the lab (19).
Plasmids.
Cal PA, PB1, PB2, NP, and NS1, as well as NC and Nan PA, genes were cloned by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using total RNA extracted from infected cells and first subcloned to pCMV-Tag4a (Stratagene) to add an in-frame Flag tag before final subcloning to pCAGGSmcs (20, 21) for expression. pCAGGS-WSNPA, -WSNPB1, -WSNPB2, and -WSNNP were obtained from Y. Kawaoka. The enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) cDNA was subcloned from pEGFP-N1 (Clontech) into pCMV-Tag4A, followed by further subcloning of eGFP-Flag into pCAGGSmcs. The pRL-SV40 vector (Promega) expresses Renilla luciferase under the control of the simian virus 40 promoter. pCAGGS-Luc expressing firefly luciferase was constructed by subcloning the luciferase gene from pPolI-NP-Luc, which was provided by T. Wolff (Robert-Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany). Chimeric PA genes were constructed using PCR for gene splicing by overlap extension (22) or using PCR amplification of individual fragments, followed by recombination of multiple fragments and vector using the In-Fusion HD cloning system (Clontech). The full-length Cal PA gene was cloned into the pPolI vector for the rescue of WSN-CalPA using the reverse genetics system described below. pCAGGS cDNAs containing the PA N-terminal domain (residues 1 to 257), or C-terminal domain (residues 258 to 716) were produced by cloning the PCR products amplified using specific primers. Cal and WSN PA-X cDNAs were constructed using QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies). Cytosine 598 was removed from the PA cDNA. The coding region of PA-X was then amplified by PCR using primers containing unique restriction enzyme sites and the Flag sequence and cloned into pCAGGSmcs. CalPANtFS, which contains mutations at the frameshift motif in the Cal PA N-terminal domain (PANt) from UCCUUUCGU to AGCUUCAGA, was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis, as described above. All constructs were sequenced for confirmation.
Luciferase assay.
293T cells were transfected with the indicated pCAGGS expression vector together with pRL-SV40 or pCAGGS-Luc for 18 to 24 h using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Luciferase production was measured using reagents in the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). All results are averages with standard deviations from three or four independent experiments.
RIPA.
To determine the impact of PA on the synthesis of coexpressed proteins, 293T cells were transfected with either empty pCAGGSmcs, pCAGGS-Cal PA-Flag, or pCAGGS-WSN PA-Flag together with pCAGGS-eGFP-Flag. At 30 min prior to the indicated time points, cells were radiolabeled and lysed in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing 9.25 mg/ml iodoacetamide, 1.7 mg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Flag-tagged proteins in cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using Dynabeads (Invitrogen) complexed with 5 μg anti-Flag M2 antibody (Ab). Samples were resuspended in NuPAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS) sample buffer and resolved on NuPAGE-Novex Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen). Dried gels were exposed to a phosphor screen and visualized using a Bio-Rad personal molecular imager (Bio-Rad). The percent adjusted volume was determined using Quantity One 1-D analysis software (Bio-Rad).
Virus rescue.
WSN-CalPA was rescued using the 12-plasmid rescue system developed by Neumann et al. (21). Briefly, a 6-well plate was seeded with a 293T/MDCK coculture. Cells were transfected with 0.1 μg of each pPolI plasmid (from WSN, except pPolI-Cal PA) and 0.4 μg each of pCAGGS-CalPA, pCAGGS-WSNPB1, pCAGGS-WSNPB2, and pCAGGS-WSNNP using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM. The medium was changed to DMEM supplemented with 1% FCS after 24 h. Rescued virus was plaque purified, and stock virus was prepared in MDCK cells. The PA sequence of the virus was confirmed. The titer of WSN-CalPA from MDCK cells was determined using the method of Reed and Muench (23).
Virus growth curves.
A549 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 for 1 h, washed once with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with magnesium and calcium (Invitrogen), and then cultured at 37°C in DMEM containing 0.15% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and tosylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin at 1 μg/ml. At the indicated time points, 10% of the culture supernatant was harvested and viral titers in MDCK cells were determined as described above. The results shown represent means and standard errors of the means (SEM) from at least 3 independent experiments.
Metabolic labeling.
To measure the impact of infection on protein synthesis, A549 cells were mock infected or infected with WSN or WSN-CalPA at an MOI of 3 for 1 h at 37°C. At 4, 6, and 8 h postinfection (hpi), cells were washed and labeled with 50 μCi [35S]Met-Cys for 30 min in medium lacking methionine and cysteine. Cells were then lysed in RIPA buffer as described above. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Dried gels were exposed to a phosphor screen and visualized using a Bio-Rad personal molecular imager. To compare the sum of intensities of pixels across lanes, volume analysis was performed using Quantity One 1-D analysis software. In brief, the volume of a selected band or region was compared across all lanes. These values are depicted as percent adjusted volume, or the volume expressed as a percentage of all of the volumes for a particular band or region of the gel.
Viability assays.
The trypan blue assay was used to determine the percent viability of both infected and transfected cells (24). Briefly, A549 cells infected at an MOI of 3 or 293T cells transfected with 1.6 μg of cDNAs were collected after trypsin-EDTA treatment and incubated with trypan blue for 5 min before live/dead counts. Additionally, viability was measured using the Cell Lab ApoScreen annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis kit (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical significance was evaluated using the nonparametric unpaired t test when comparing appropriate groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Pandemic H1N1 PA contributes to the suppression of protein expression from cotransfected cDNAs.
The influenza virus polymerase complex is thought to be involved in the shutoff of host protein synthesis, as expression of the complex results in the ubiquitination and degradation of RNAPII (15). To further determine the contribution of each component to influenza-induced shutoff, we generated cDNA expression vectors containing Flag-tagged viral polymerase subunits from the pandemic A/California/04/09 strain (Cal). In addition, as previous studies suggested that NS1 inhibited cellular mRNA translation (7, 25), we chose to also include NS1 in our initial evaluation. 293T cells were cotransfected for 24 h with pCMV-eGFP-Flag and individual plasmids to direct the expression of the indicated Cal genes. We observed that in the presence of Cal PB1, PB2, or NS1, eGFP expression was found to be similar to that in cells expressing empty vector. However, eGFP expression was markedly decreased in cells cotransfected with Cal PA (Fig. 1A). To validate these results quantitatively, we next measured the effect of individual viral protein expression on the production of luciferase from transfected cDNA. As observed with eGFP, coexpression of PA significantly reduced luciferase expression by 25-fold compared to that with empty vector, in sharp contrast to the 3-, 2-, or 6-fold reduction compared to expression with empty vector in the presence of PB1, PB2, and NS1, respectively (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that PA has the most significant effect on suppression of coexpressed proteins.
Fig 1
Fig 1
PA reduces the expression of cotransfected proteins. 293T cells were cotransfected with expression vectors containing eGFP or luciferase genes together with the indicated Cal genes. (A) eGFP expression at 24 h posttransfection. (B) Luciferase expression (more ...)
During influenza virus infection, the majority of PA is incorporated into the polymerase complex. To address whether the shutoff function of PA is retained both when PA is expressed by itself and when it is expressed as part of the polymerase complex, 293T cells were cotransfected with luciferase and either PA alone or PA in conjunction with PB1, PB2, and NP. The amount of PA cDNA was adjusted so that the same amount of PA was expressed across samples, which was confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 1C, lower panel). Quantification of the luciferase level revealed a similar level of reduction in cells expressing PA alone or PA together with other nucleocapsid components, showing that both forms of PA can suppress cotransfected luciferase expression (Fig. 1C).
Avian-origin PA is more efficient than human-origin PA at suppressing protein expression.
The PA gene from the 2009 pandemic strain originated from an avian virus (26). To determine the impact of gene origin on shutoff of exogenous protein expression, we compared the activities of avian and human virus PAs in suppressing nonviral protein synthesis, using Cal and A/chicken/Nanchang/3-120/01 (Nan) PAs as avian-like or avian PA and A/New Caledonia/20/99 (NC) and A/WSN/33 (WSN) PAs as human virus PA. Following cotransfection of eGFP cDNA together with the PAs of Cal, Nan, NC, and WSN, we detected that eGFP expression was significantly reduced in the presence of Cal or Nan PA, which are of avian origin, compared to in the presence of those of human virus origin (Fig. 2A). Similarly, luciferase expression was greatly reduced in the presence of avian-origin PA, i.e., 32-fold with Cal and 53-fold with Nan, compared to the reduction seen with human-origin PA, i.e., 5-fold with NC and 3-fold with WSN (Fig. 2B). Although the level of PA expression differed between strains, these differences did not correlate with reduced luciferase expression. For example, Nan PA was detected minimally in transfected cells; however, it reduced the level of coexpressed luciferase the most effectively. Similarly, although a large amount of WSN PA was expressed, it showed a very limited effect on luciferase expression (Fig. 2B). In order to evaluate whether this difference of suppression was host cell specific, we performed the same luciferase assay in chicken fibroblast DF-1 cells. Avian-origin PA most effectively suppressed luciferase expression, suggesting that the difference in shutoff between viruses is not host cell specific (Fig. 2C).
Fig 2
Fig 2
Avian-origin PAs are more active in suppressing coexpressed proteins. 293T cells were cotransfected with expression vectors containing eGFP or luciferase genes together with the PA genes of the indicated viruses. (A) eGFP expression as measured at 24 (more ...)
Avian-origin PA significantly affects the synthesis of coexpressed proteins.
Our data shown above clearly indicate that Cal PA strongly suppresses expression of coexpressed proteins. This effect could also affect the level of PA itself if PA affects cellular machinery for protein synthesis. To address this, we compared the synthesis of eGFP and PA at various times after transfection. 293T cells were cotransfected with PA and eGFP both tagged with Flag, and at 6, 10, and 14 h posttransfection, cells were labeled with [35S]Met-Cys for 30 min. Newly synthesized proteins were immunoprecipitated by anti-Flag antibody and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3A). In cells expressing eGFP and WSN PA, synthesis of both proteins increased over time. However, in cells expressing eGFP and Cal PA, Cal PA production was increased over time, while eGFP synthesis was strongly suppressed from early (6 h) to late (14 h) time points (Fig. 3B). It should be noted that the increase in Cal PA expression itself was slower than that observed for WSN PA or eGFP when expressed alone. This suggests that Cal PA negatively affects its own expression, although the suppressive effect was significantly stronger in the case of coexpressed eGFP. The Cal and WSN PA cDNA constructs do not contain the noncoding sequence upstream of the start codon that has previously been shown to enable preferential translation of viral mRNAs (27). Therefore, preferential expression of Cal PA in concert with the dramatic shutoff of nonviral proteins is not likely due to the intrinsic structural features of the noncoding sequence of the viral gene.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Cal PA strongly suppresses production of coexpressed nonviral proteins. (A) 293T cells were cotransfected with expression vectors containing eGFP and either WSN PA, Cal PA, or empty vector. At the indicated time points following transfection (hpt), cells (more ...)
Growth of the WSN-CalPA virus is attenuated.
Due to the significant difference in shutoff of nonviral protein synthesis between avian-origin PA and human-origin PA, we further evaluated this difference in the context of viral infection. To address this, we generated a recombinant WSN virus containing Cal PA (WSN-CalPA) using the 12-plasmid rescue system (21). The rescued virus was plaque purified and subsequently amplified in MDCK cells. The origin of the PA gene of WSN-CalPA was confirmed by sequencing the RT-PCR product of the gene. First, we compared the growth kinetics of WSN and WSN-CalPA in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. At early time points following infection, WSN and WSN-CalPA had similar growth kinetics, while at later time points, the WSN-CalPA titer in the culture medium was reduced compared to that of WSN (Fig. 4A), possibly due to increased cytopathic effect observed in WSN-CalPA-infected cells. Plaque phenotypes for both viruses were similar, suggesting no major defects in viral replication or cell-to-cell spread (data not shown).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Virus growth and suppression of cellular protein synthesis. (A) Reduced growth of WSN-CalPA in A549 cells. A549 cells were infected with either WSN or WSN-CalPA at an MOI of 0.01 and cultured in the presence of trypsin at 1 μg/ml for 96 h. Virus (more ...)
Protein synthesis is reduced to a greater extent during infection with WSN-CalPA.
Reduced protein expression in the presence of PA could be the result of protein synthesis suppression or protein degradation due to the reported proteolysis function of PA. No studies to date have evaluated the impact of PA on protein synthesis in an infection model. To determine the impact of PA on protein synthesis, A549 cells were either left uninfected or infected with WSN or WSN-CalPA at an MOI of 3, and at various time points after infection, cells were radiolabeled with [35S]Met-Cys for 30 min to determine the overall protein synthesis in infected cells. At early times (4 h) following infection, cellular protein levels were similar in all three instances. However, as infection ensued, cellular protein synthesis was reduced in the presence of virus, and this was more efficient in cells infected with WSN-CalPA (Fig. 4B). Quantification of cellular proteins with a molecular mass of greater than 100 kDa (shown as CP1) or 50 kDa (CP2) confirmed that cellular protein synthesis was strongly inhibited by WSN-CalPA infection at 8 h (Fig. 4B and andC).C). In contrast, viral protein synthesis increased with time and was more significant in WSN-CalPA-infected cells. This difference is likely to reflect efficient host protein synthesis shutoff by Cal PA and/or enhanced virus replication kinetics. Together, these data suggest that in the course of infection, Cal PA has a greater impact on cellular protein synthesis shutoff and viral protein production than WSN PA.
Increased apoptosis in cells infected with WSN-CalPA.
Examination of cells transfected with PA cDNA revealed increased cytopathic effect in the presence of avian-origin PA at 24 h after transfection (data not shown). We also detected reduced virus growth of WSN-CalPA at late time points, which could be explained by enhanced cell death (Fig. 4A). Our failure to establish A549 cell lines constitutively expressing Cal PA (data not shown) further suggested that Cal PA induces strong cytopathogenicity in cells. To determine if the presence of Cal PA affects cell viability and enhances apoptotic cell death, A549 cells were infected with both WSN and WSN-CalPA at an MOI of 3, and at various time points after infection, cells were harvested and live cells were detected and counted by trypan blue exclusion assay. As early as 9 h after infection, the percent viable cells was reduced in cells infected with WSN-CalPA, and WSN-CalPA induced more cell death throughout infection as measured up to 48 h (Fig. 5A). To determine if infected cells were undergoing apoptosis, we performed immunofluorescence for annexin V, an early marker of apoptosis, and propidium iodide, indicative of late apoptosis. At both 12 h and 24 h postinfection, the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis was substantially higher in cells infected with WSN-CalPA than in WSN-infected cells (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these results suggest that the PA gene of influenza virus also contributes to the induction of apoptotic cell death, potentially as a result of host protein synthesis shutoff.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Enhanced apoptosis induction by WSN-CalPA. A549 cells were infected with either WSN or WSN-CalPA at an MOI of 3, and cell viability and apoptotic state were determined. (A) Cell viability was determined by trypan blue staining. (B) Apoptotic cells were (more ...)
The N-terminal domain of PA is responsible for the suppression of protein synthesis.
Structural studies of PA suggest that PA is composed of two domains, i.e., an N-terminal domain consisting of residues 1 to 257 and a C-terminal domain composed of residues 258 to 716. Taking advantage of the difference in activity between Cal and WSN PA, we created two PA chimeras composed of WSN or Cal PA domains (Fig. 6A). The chimeras, as well as wild-type (wt) PA genes, were tagged with Flag for direct comparison of expressed protein levels. We expressed the PA proteins together with luciferase and determined the level of luciferase expression in cotransfected cells. As shown in Fig. 6B, chimera CW PA suppressed luciferase expression as efficiently as wt Cal PA, suggesting that the difference in activity between Cal and WSN is determined by the PA N-terminal domain.
Fig 6
Fig 6
The N-terminal domain of PA determines shutoff activity. (A) Schematic diagram of the chimeric PA constructs. (B) Luciferase expression from pRL-SV40 in cells cotransfected with the indicated chimeric PA genes in pCAGGS. (C) Expression of PA proteins (more ...)
To determine if the N-terminal domain by itself suppresses host protein synthesis, as reported previously (28), we created cDNAs that express the N-terminal domain (residues 1 to 257) of either Cal and WSN or the C-terminal domain (residues 258 to 716) of Cal. For an unknown reason, we were unable to stably express the C-terminal domain of WSN. We determined the effect of these domains on the suppression of cotransfected luciferase gene products. As shown in Fig. 7, coexpression of the C-terminal domain of Cal had no effect on the luciferase level, while the N-terminal domain of Cal strongly suppressed the expression of cotransfected luciferase. In fact, the effect of the N-terminal domain was even stronger than that of the full-size PA molecule. These results indicate that the N-terminal domain containing the endonuclease active site is responsible for the suppression of cotransfected gene product expression.
Fig 7
Fig 7
The N-terminal 257 residues are sufficient to induce shutoff. (A) Luciferase expression from pRL-SV40 in cells cotransfected with the indicated PA genes in pCAGGS. PANt indicates a protein containing the PA N-terminal 257 residues, and PACt indicates (more ...)
Identification of the residues that affect protein expression.
Cal and WSN PA contain 15 amino acid differences in the N-terminal fragment (Fig. 8A). To identify the residues that differentiate the suppressive activities of Cal and WSN PA, we constructed 8 chimeric PA N-terminal fragments (Fig. 8A) and determined their ability to inhibit coexpressed luciferase expression (Fig. 8B). All of the chimeric PA N-terminal domains were expressed at a similar level as determined by Western blotting using an anti-Flag antibody (Fig. 8C). Comparison of the levels of luciferase coexpressed with chimeras 1 and 2 indicated that residues within the PA N-terminal 186 amino acids are responsible for the strong inhibition of coexpressed protein. Chimeras 8 and 5, which contain only residues 57 to 65 and 85 to 114 from Cal PA, respectively, suppressed luciferase expression 5.5- and 2.4-fold, respectively. Expression of chimera 7, which contains residues 57 to 114 of Cal PA, resulted in the greatest suppression (17-fold) of luciferase activity. Within the crystal structure of the PA N-terminal fragment, residues 57 to 65 are in a flexible loop region of unknown structure (29). Residues 85 to 91 are in the helix α4, and residue 100 is located in the loop between α4 and β2 (Fig. 8D). Interestingly, the region most strongly affecting shutoff activity (residues 57 to 114) is located proximally to an area containing a flexible loop and helix α4, suggesting the overall structure of the region plays a major role in shutoff activity. In addition to this region, we noticed that residue 186 also contributes to the inhibitory effect. Comparisons of the shutoff activities of chimeras 1 and 3, as well as those of chimeras 4 and 5, which differ only at residue 186, indicate that a glycine at position 186 confers greater shutoff activity than a serine at this position. Nan PA, which has a stronger inhibitory activity than Cal PA, contains a glycine at position 186 (data not shown), potentially explaining the difference in activity between Cal and Nan (Fig. 2). Overall, characterization of chimeric PA N-terminal fragments suggests that multiple regions of PA, mainly helix α4 and the flexible loop at positions 51 to 74, are involved in shutoff activity.
Fig 8
Fig 8
Identification of the residues required for shutoff. (A) Sequence differences between the Cal and WSN PA N-terminal regions (residues 1 to 257). The amino acid differences in the Cal/WSN chimeric PA N-terminal constructs are also shown. (B) Luciferase (more ...)
PA-X strongly suppresses protein expression.
Recently, a new viral protein, termed PA-X, has been identified to be expressed from the PA gene by ribosomal frameshifting (18). Cal and WSN PA-X are composed of 232 and 252 residues containing PA-X unique sequences in residues 192 to 232 and 192 to 252, respectively (Fig. 9A). It is possible that PA-X expressed by frameshifting from PANt cDNA is responsible for the reduction in protein expression. To address this, we constructed a cDNA that expresses only PA-X by deleting cytosine 598 and constructed a CalPANtFS cDNA containing mutations at the frameshift motif, which reduces the expression of PA-X (18). Cotransfection of these cDNAs with luciferase cDNA clearly indicates that PA-X expression has a strong impact on suppressive effects (Fig. 9B). This result indicates that the unique C-terminal sequence in PA-X plays a major role in the suppression of protein expression. Interestingly, WSN PA-X is less active than Cal PA-X at a level similar to that observed for PA N-terminal fragments (Fig. 8), suggesting that the regions shown in Fig. 8D are responsible for the difference in shutoff activity between Cal and WSN PA-X proteins.
Fig 9
Fig 9
Shutoff activity of PA-X. (A) Sequence differences in the unique region between the Cal PA N-terminal fragment and PA-X (top). The unique C-terminal region of PA-X is highly homologous between Cal and WSN, except that WSN contains an additional 20 residues (more ...)
Structural and functional analyses revealed that PA possesses an endonuclease site in the N-terminal domain with a putative P107D108X10E119K134 active motif (29). It has been shown that D108A and K134A mutations completely inhibit endonuclease activity in vitro (30). Jagger et al. showed that mutations at residue 108 resulted in elimination of the shutoff activity of PA-X (18). To determine if endonuclease activity is required for shutoff activity, we created and analyzed the shutoff activity of Cal PA or Cal PA-X containing the K134A mutation. As shown in Fig. 9C, a single mutation at residue 134 completely abolished the repressive activity in cotransfected luciferase expression, supporting the idea that endonuclease activity is required for shutoff activity (18).
Virally induced inhibition of cellular protein synthesis, or shutoff, is a process in which the virus hijacks cellular machinery for its own benefit. Viruses rely on host cell machinery for replication and production of progeny virions. Therefore, viral control of cellular transcription/translation machinery for preferential production of viral proteins is beneficial for the virus. Inhibition of host protein synthesis also prevents the cellular antiviral response, which can contribute to efficient virus production and spread. In the present study, we identified the domain within the PA subunit of the influenza virus polymerase complex that critically affects expression of exogenous protein, as confirmed by cotransfection experiments. We also showed that PA suppresses cellular protein synthesis and has an effect on the induction of apoptosis in virus-infected cells. Our results indicate an additional role for PA gene products in the control of host cell protein synthesis machinery, which is likely to affect viral production and cytopathogenicity of infected cells.
Influenza virus is known to shut off host cell protein synthesis following infection (3, 4). It is highly likely that multiple viral proteins and their functions contribute to the overall magnitude of host protein synthesis shutoff. In fact, some viral proteins have been identified to have functions that contribute to shutoff. NS1 blocks nuclear export of mRNA and inhibits mRNA splicing (7, 31). The viral polymerase complex removes 5′ methyl caps from host cell pre-mRNA for the synthesis of viral mRNA (32) and also degrades cellular RNA polymerase II (14, 15). These viral protein functions likely alter the steady-state levels of cellular mRNAs. However, analysis of mRNA levels using a cDNA microarray assay indicated that influenza virus infection only partially affected mRNA levels, whereas a significant downregulation of cellular mRNAs, which would explain the profound inhibition of host protein synthesis, was not observed in infected cells (33). The data suggest that downregulation of cellular transcription or transcripts may not be the major factor that mediates host protein synthesis shutoff but that there may be an additional mechanism(s) involved in the control of host cell protein synthesis in infected cells.
Our data presented here clearly indicate that PA gene products have a significant impact on host protein synthesis shutoff. Comparison of protein synthesis shutoff by each polymerase component, as well as by NS1, clearly implicates PA as the major factor for host protein synthesis shutoff (Fig. 1). A role for PA in shutoff of host protein synthesis is also supported by our failure and the inability of others to generate cell lines that stably express PA (34). The molecular mechanism by which PA induces shutoff is unclear at this stage. However, previous reports implicate the proteolytic activity of PA in shutoff of both cellular and viral proteins (16, 28). In these studies, the impact of PA expression on the steady-state levels of coexpressed proteins was evaluated by pulse-chase experiments, which suggest that the expression of PA affects the half-lives of coexpressed proteins. However, the rate of degradation of coexpressed proteins in this study was not high enough to explain the level of reduction we observed in cells labeled for 30 min without chase (Fig. 3). Furthermore, a study of the crystal structure of the PA N-terminal domain found no obvious protease active site, and an additional in vitro protease assay supported no detectable proteolytic activity in the N-terminal domain of PA (29). Taking this together with our data, we anticipate that PA contributes to shutoff not through the proteolytic degradation of existing proteins but rather by inhibiting the synthesis of new protein. Coexpression of eGFP and Cal PA, both tagged with the same Flag tag, resulted in suppression of eGFP synthesis (Fig. 3). PA expression was also suppressed, although this was not as significant as eGFP suppression. This result may indicate that, even in the absence of the 5′ untranslated region, there might be a mechanism that allows for viral proteins to escape the suppressive effect. Also, in infected cells, viral protein synthesis increases while cellular protein production is strongly blocked (Fig. 4). It is unclear how viral proteins are selectively produced; however, it is possible that PA is involved in selective shutoff of nonviral protein synthesis.
Interestingly, there was a difference in the activity of host protein synthesis shutoff between the avian and human virus PA proteins examined. PAs from an avian virus (Nan) or the avian-origin pH1N1 (Cal) demonstrated much more efficient shutoff of host protein synthesis than those from a human virus (NC) or a mouse-adapted human virus (WSN) (Fig. 2). By characterizing the shutoff effect of Cal/WSN chimeric PA N-terminal fragments, we identified regions responsible for the difference in the activity, which include a flexible loop and the helix α4 (Fig. 8). To determine if these residues were conserved among avian or human isolates, we analyzed the PA sequences of 5,643 avian and 4,782 human influenza viruses. The results indicate that most of the avian, but not human, viruses contain residues 57R, 62I, 65S, and 100V (Table 1), which enhanced the reduction in protein expression from cotransfected cDNAs (Fig. 8). Therefore, the sequence data support the idea that avian influenza virus contains a PA gene that is more effective in shutoff activity. It is not clear if this difference in PA activity has significance for host-specific virus growth, although it is conceivable that strong host protein shutoff by avian virus PA gene products could be an important factor in preventing the antiviral response in avian hosts. In mammalian hosts, a critical function of NS1 in suppressing the innate immune response is well established (3537). The in vivo role of avian virus NS1 in chickens has not yet been studied in detail. However, a recent study using NS1 mutant viruses suggests that NS1 does not suppress IFN gene expression efficiently in vivo. It was suggested that, in chickens, other functions of NS1, such as its ability to inhibit apoptosis, might be more critical for maintaining the virus in an avian host (38). It is unknown how much of an effect PA has in antagonizing the innate immune response in avian hosts. However, it is possible that influenza viruses develop different mechanisms to escape the antiviral response to achieve the best transmission efficiency in specific hosts.
Table 1
Table 1
Amino acid differences between avian and human PA proteins
Expression of an N-terminal domain of PA comprised of 257 residues was sufficient to inhibit protein synthesis (Fig. 7). This is consistent with a previous study, using deletion mutants, which showed that the N-terminal 247 residues are sufficient for reduced accumulation of coexpressed proteins (28). However, our data with chimeric PA N-terminal fragments uncovered the presence of a particular domain that determines the activity, located at helix α4 and the flexible loop of amino acids 51 to 57 (Fig. 8). The fact that these regions are proximally located in the crystal structure suggests that a possible interaction with a cellular protein(s) through the helix/loop domain is required for the suppressive activity of PA.
Recently, an additional PA gene product, termed PA-X, has been reported (18). PA-X contains the region which reflects the difference in reducing protein synthesis between WSN and Cal. In fact, Cal PA-X repressed expression of cotransfected gene products more efficiently than WSN PA-X (Fig. 9B), supporting our findings that the flexible loop (residues 51 to 74) and helix α4 determine the difference in the activity between WSN and Cal. In addition, both Cal and WSN PA-X showed stronger suppressive activity than PA N-terminal fragments, indicating that unique sequences in the C-terminal region of PA-X also play an important role in reducing protein expression (Fig. 9A). Although the mechanism is unclear at this stage, it is highly likely that mRNA degradation is a key process in reducing protein expression, as mutations at the endonuclease active sites (D108A and K134A) completely abolished the repressive activity (Fig. 9C) (18). Further studies into the mechanism of how PA-X efficiently suppresses protein synthesis are required to unveil its role in virus replication and pathogenesis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the New York Influenza Center of Excellence (NYICE), a member of the NIAID CEIRS network, under NIH contract HHSN266200700008C and National Institutes of Health training grant T32 AI007362 (to E.A.D.).
We thank Leslie MacDonald for technical assistance.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 2 January 2013
1. Smith NM, Bresee JS, Shay DK, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Strikas RA. 2006. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recommend. Rep. 55:1–42. [PubMed]
2. Perrone LA, Plowden JK, Garcia-Sastre A, Katz JM, Tumpey TM. 2008. H5N1 and 1918 pandemic influenza virus infection results in early and excessive infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils in the lungs of mice. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000115 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000115. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Katze MG, DeCorato D, Krug RM. 1986. Cellular mRNA translation is blocked at both initiation and elongation after infection by influenza virus or adenovirus. J. Virol. 60:1027–1039. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Katze MG, Detjen BM, Safer B, Krug RM. 1986. Translational control by influenza virus: suppression of the kinase that phosphorylates the alpha subunit of initiation factor eIF-2 and selective translation of influenza viral mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:1741–1750. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Garcia-Sastre A, Egorov A, Matassov D, Brandt S, Levy DE, Durbin JE, Palese P, Muster T. 1998. Influenza A virus lacking the NS1 gene replicates in interferon-deficient systems. Virology 252:324–330. [PubMed]
6. Talon J, Horvath CM, Polley R, Basler CF, Muster T, Palese P, Garcia-Sastre A. 2000. Activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 is inhibited by the influenza A virus NS1 protein. J. Virol. 74:7989–7996. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Fortes P, Beloso A, Ortin J. 1994. Influenza virus NS1 protein inhibits pre-mRNA splicing and blocks mRNA nucleocytoplasmic transport. EMBO J. 13:704–712. [PubMed]
8. Qian XY, Alonso-Caplen F, Krug RM. 1994. Two functional domains of the influenza virus NS1 protein are required for regulation of nuclear export of mRNA. J. Virol. 68:2433–2441. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Qiu Y, Krug RM. 1994. The influenza virus NS1 protein is a poly(A)-binding protein that inhibits nuclear export of mRNAs containing poly(A). J. Virol. 68:2425–2432. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. de la Luna S, Fortes P, Beloso A, Ortin J. 1995. Influenza virus NS1 protein enhances the rate of translation initiation of viral mRNAs. J. Virol. 69:2427–2433. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Enami K, Sato TA, Nakada S, Enami M. 1994. Influenza virus NS1 protein stimulates translation of the M1 protein. J. Virol. 68:1432–1437. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Salvatore M, Basler CF, Parisien JP, Horvath CM, Bourmakina S, Zheng H, Muster T, Palese P, Garcia-Sastre A. 2002. Effects of influenza A virus NS1 protein on protein expression: the NS1 protein enhances translation and is not required for shutoff of host protein synthesis. J. Virol. 76:1206–1212. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Engelhardt OG, Smith M, Fodor E. 2005. Association of the influenza A virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase with cellular RNA polymerase II. J. Virol. 79:5812–5818. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Rodriguez A, Perez-Gonzalez A, Nieto A. 2007. Influenza virus infection causes specific degradation of the largest subunit of cellular RNA polymerase II. J. Virol. 81:5315–5324. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Vreede FT, Chan AY, Sharps J, Fodor E. 2010. Mechanisms and functional implications of the degradation of host RNA polymerase II in influenza virus infected cells. Virology 396:125–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Sanz-Ezquerro JJ, de la Luna S, Ortin J, Nieto A. 1995. Individual expression of influenza virus PA protein induces degradation of coexpressed proteins. J. Virol. 69:2420–2426. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Huarte M, Falcon A, Nakaya Y, Ortin J, Garcia-Sastre A, Nieto A. 2003. Threonine 157 of influenza virus PA polymerase subunit modulates RNA replication in infectious viruses. J. Virol. 77:6007–6013. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Jagger BW, Wise HM, Kash JC, Walters KA, Wills NM, Xiao YL, Dunfee RL, Schwartzman LM, Ozinsky A, Bell GL, Dalton RM, Lo A, Efstathiou S, Atkins JF, Firth AE, Taubenberger JK, Digard P. 2012. An overlapping protein-coding region in influenza A virus segment 3 modulates the host response. Science 337:199–204. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. MacDonald LA, Aggarwal S, Bussey KA, Desmet EA, Kim B, Takimoto T. 2012. Molecular interactions and trafficking of influenza A virus polymerase proteins analyzed by specific monoclonal antibodies. Virology 426:51–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kobasa D, Rodgers ME, Wells K, Kawaoka Y. 1997. Neuraminidase hemadsorption activity, conserved in avian influenza A viruses, does not influence viral replication in ducks. J. Virol. 71:6706–6713. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Neumann G, Watanabe T, Ito H, Watanabe S, Goto H, Gao P, Hughes M, Perez DR, Donis R, Hoffmann E, Hobom G, Kawaoka Y. 1999. Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:9345–9350. [PubMed]
22. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR. 1989. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61–68. [PubMed]
23. Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 27:493–497.
24. Tennant JR. 1964. Evaluation of the trypan blue technique for determination of cell viability. Transplantation 2:685–694. [PubMed]
25. Lu Y, Wambach M, Katze MG, Krug RM. 1995. Binding of the influenza virus NS1 protein to double-stranded RNA inhibits the activation of the protein kinase that phosphorylates the elF-2 translation initiation factor. Virology 214:222–228. [PubMed]
26. Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, Sessions WM, Xu X, Skepner E, Deyde V, Okomo-Adhiambo M, Gubareva L, Barnes J, Smith CB, Emery SL, Hillman MJ, Rivailler P, Smagala J, de Graaf M, Burke DF, Fouchier RA, Pappas C, Alpuche-Aranda CM, Lopez-Gatell H, Olivera H, Lopez I, Myers CA, Faix D, Blair PJ, Yu C, Keene KM, Dotson PD, Jr, Boxrud D, Sambol AR, Abid SH, St George K, Bannerman T, Moore AL, Stringer DJ, Blevins P, Demmler-Harrison GJ, Ginsberg M, Kriner P, Waterman S, Smole S, Guevara HF, Belongia EA, Clark PA, Beatrice ST, Donis R, Katz J, Finelli L, Bridges CB, Shaw M, Jernigan DB, Uyeki TM, Smith DJ, Klimov AI, Cox NJ. 2009. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 325:197–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Garfinkel MS, Katze MG. 1993. Translational control by influenza virus. Selective translation is mediated by sequences within the viral mRNA 5′-untranslated region. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22223–22226. [PubMed]
28. Sanz-Ezquerro JJ, Zurcher T, de la Luna S, Ortin J, Nieto A. 1996. The amino-terminal one-third of the influenza virus PA protein is responsible for the induction of proteolysis. J. Virol. 70:1905–1911. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Yuan P, Bartlam M, Lou Z, Chen S, Zhou J, He X, Lv Z, Ge R, Li X, Deng T, Fodor E, Rao Z, Liu Y. 2009. Crystal structure of an avian influenza polymerase PA(N) reveals an endonuclease active site. Nature 458:909–913. [PubMed]
30. Hara K, Schmidt FI, Crow M, Brownlee GG. 2006. Amino acid residues in the N-terminal region of the PA subunit of influenza A virus RNA polymerase play a critical role in protein stability, endonuclease activity, cap binding, and virion RNA promoter binding. J. Virol. 80:7789–7798. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Satterly N, Tsai PL, van Deursen J, Nussenzveig DR, Wang Y, Faria PA, Levay A, Levy DE, Fontoura BM. 2007. Influenza virus targets the mRNA export machinery and the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:1853–1858. [PubMed]
32. Plotch SJ, Bouloy M, Ulmanen I, Krug RM. 1981. A unique cap(m7GpppXm)-dependent influenza virion endonuclease cleaves capped RNAs to generate the primers that initiate viral RNA transcription. Cell 23:847–858. [PubMed]
33. Geiss GK, An MC, Bumgarner RE, Hammersmark E, Cunningham D, Katze MG. 2001. Global impact of influenza virus on cellular pathways is mediated by both replication-dependent and -independent events. J. Virol. 75:4321–4331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Stranden AM, Staeheli P, Pavlovic J. 1993. Function of the mouse Mx1 protein is inhibited by overexpression of the PB2 protein of influenza virus. Virology 197:642–651. [PubMed]
35. Garcia-Sastre A. 2001. Inhibition of interferon-mediated antiviral responses by influenza A viruses and other negative-strand RNA viruses. Virology 279:375–384. [PubMed]
36. Krug RM, Yuan W, Noah DL, Latham AG. 2003. Intracellular warfare between human influenza viruses and human cells: the roles of the viral NS1 protein. Virology 309:181–189. [PubMed]
37. Seo SH, Hoffmann E, Webster RG. 2002. Lethal H5N1 influenza viruses escape host anti-viral cytokine responses. Nat. Med. 8:950–954. [PubMed]
38. Penski N, Hartle S, Rubbenstroth D, Krohmann C, Ruggli N, Schusser B, Pfann M, Reuter A, Gohrbandt S, Hundt J, Veits J, Breithaupt A, Kochs G, Stech J, Summerfield A, Vahlenkamp T, Kaspers B, Staeheli P. 2011. Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses do not inhibit interferon synthesis in infected chickens but can override the interferon-induced antiviral state. J. Virol. 85:7730–7741. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of
American Society for Microbiology (ASM)