Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e58462.
Published online 2013 March 6. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0058462
PMCID: PMC3590189

GEI-8, a Homologue of Vertebrate Nuclear Receptor Corepressor NCoR/SMRT, Regulates Gonad Development and Neuronal Functions in Caenorhabditis elegans

Vincent Laudet, Editor


NCoR and SMRT are two paralogous vertebrate proteins that function as corepressors with unliganded nuclear receptors. Although C. elegans has a large number of nuclear receptors, orthologues of the corepressors NCoR and SMRT have not unambiguously been identified in Drosophila or C. elegans. Here, we identify GEI-8 as the closest homologue of NCoR and SMRT in C. elegans and demonstrate that GEI-8 is expressed as at least two isoforms throughout development in multiple tissues, including neurons, muscle and intestinal cells. We demonstrate that a homozygous deletion within the gei-8 coding region, which is predicted to encode a truncated protein lacking the predicted NR domain, results in severe mutant phenotypes with developmental defects, slow movement and growth, arrested gonadogenesis and defects in cholinergic neurotransmission. Whole genome expression analysis by microarrays identified sets of de-regulated genes consistent with both the observed mutant phenotypes and a role of GEI-8 in regulating transcription. Interestingly, the upregulated transcripts included a predicted mitochondrial sulfide:quinine reductase encoded by Y9C9A.16. This locus also contains non-coding, 21-U RNAs of the piRNA class. Inhibition of the expression of the region coding for 21-U RNAs leads to irregular gonadogenesis in the homozygous gei-8 mutants, but not in an otherwise wild-type background, suggesting that GEI-8 may function in concert with the 21-U RNAs to regulate gonadogenesis. Our results confirm that GEI-8 is the orthologue of the vertebrate NCoR/SMRT corepressors and demonstrate important roles for this putative transcriptional corepressor in development and neuronal function.


NCoR and SMRT are paralogous vertebrate proteins that were first identified as transcriptional corepressors interacting with unliganded thyroid and retinoid receptors [1], [2]. Both NCoR (a.k.a. NCoR1, NCOR1) and SMRT (a.k.a. NCoR2, NCOR2) knockouts in mice are embryonic lethal suggesting that their regulatory roles are indispensable for normal development [3]. NCoR/SMRT function occurs through the assembly of a repressor complex composed of nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs), histone deactylases (HDACs), and other components [4]. Chromatin remodeling depends on the formation of a stoichiometric complex between SMRT/NCoR and HDAC3 that is mediated by two SANT (a.k.a. MYB) domains located at the N-terminus of NCoR/SMRT. Such domains are present in many nuclear receptor corepressors and related proteins and consist of three alpha-helices folded around a core of three hydrophobic amino acids, which determines its characteristic spatial structure [5][7]. The N-terminus proximal SANT1 domain activates the HDAC3 deacetylase [8], [9] and is referred to as the deacetylase activation domain (DAD). A prominent feature of all DAD domains is the absolutely conserved lysine residue (K449 in human SMRT) that promotes HDAC3 activation but not its binding to the complex. The second SANT domain, SANT2, binds unacetylated histone H4 and increases affinity of NCoR/SMRT to HDAC3, suggesting a role for this motif in stabilizing the deacetylated histone tail and blocking its subsequent acetylation [7], [8]. While the SANT2 domain in NCoR/SMRT possesses all of the typical features of a general SANT domain, the presence and structure of the SANT1 domain is unique to NCoR/SMRT and its orthologues [10]. The SANT1 domain contains a characteristic irregular N-terminal helix that is important for forming an additional surface hydrophobic groove that contributes to the interaction with HDAC3. Thus, there are multiple diagnostic domains and amino acid residues that can distinguish NCoR/SMRT orthologues from more general SANT domain-containing proteins.

Although homologues of NCoR/SMRT can be easily identified across vertebrate species, obvious homologues of these corepressors were difficult to identify by sequence homology in either Drosophila or C. elegans. This is surprising in light of the identification of clear sequence homologues for other NCoR/SMRT corepressor complex components in flies and worms such as the histone deacetylase complex associated factors NuRD and SIN3 [11], [12]. We have taken a bioinformatics approach focusing on the unique features of NCoR/SMRT to identify GEI-8 as a possible NCoR/SMRT homologue in C. elegans; Yamamato and colleagues came to the same conclusion while this work was in progress [13]. GEI-8 was originally identified as a GEX-3 binding protein based on yeast-two-hybrid assays [14]; no RNAi phenotypes or functions for GEI-8 have previously been described. We have analyzed the expression of gei-8 and studied its function using a putative null allele with a large deletion in the gei-8 coding sequence resulting in a truncated protein product due to a novel stop codon; this truncated product lacks the domain involved in binding of nuclear receptors (NR domain, a.k.a CoRNR box [15]). Our mutant studies demonstrate a role for GEI-8 in development and suggest it is specifically required for germline development and proper cholinergic regulation. Our whole genome expression analysis demonstrates that GEI-8 is required for transcriptional regulation, consistent with its function and orthology to mammalian NCoR/SMRT corepressors.


Sequence Analysis

In an effort to identify homologues of NCoR/SMRT in the C. elegans proteome, we performed BLAST and PSI-BLAST searches in multiple protein databases [16], [17]. Searches with human NCoR and SMRT sequences returned the sequence annotated as GEI-8 (UniProt GEI8_CAEEL, E value 2e-10), as the best hit. In the reciprocal BLAST, NCoR and SMRT appeared likewise as the best hits for GEI-8 within the human proteome. Although only a small fraction of the entire protein sequence (~7%) was retrieved by Blast searches, nearly complete protein sequences were recovered in PSI-BLAST after the third iteration. Six GEI-8-related proteins from other Nematoda species (C. elegans, C. brenneri, C. briggsae, C. remanei, C. japonica, Loa loa and Brugia malayi) were aligned and submitted as a query in PSI-BLAST (Figure 1). Sequences were extracted from databases UniProt, Wormbase and Ensembl. Entries for C. japonica and X. tropicalis were corrected according to NCBI nucleotide sequences using the GeneWise program [18]. An alignment of these nematode GEI-8-related proteins with human NCoR was obtained in the second iteration.

Figure 1
Comparison of N-terminal regions of GEI-8-related proteins to NCoR/SMRT.

Multiple sequence alignments resulting from PSI-BLAST were further improved using the profile-to-profile alignment method (PSI-Coffee) [19], however, its quality remained ambiguous in several regions across the protein. All NCoR homologues contain long stretches of low complexity (e.g. 23% of amino acids in GEI-8 or 13% in human NCoR1) that are variable in length. The well conserved N-terminal region from representative Metazoa/Fungi NCoR/SMRT is shown in Figure 1. The sequence conservation in the C-terminal domains is much lower; all sequences contain many insertions, deletions, prolines, serines and oligoGlu residues that vary between species. This C-terminal variability is evident even within the alignment of the GEI-8-related proteins from the phylogenetically related Caenorhabditis species. We also used ClustalW2.0 for identification of putative interaction motifs near the C-terminus. NCoR and SMRT bind nuclear hormone receptors by NR-binding domains consisting of three and two CoRNR-box sequences respectively. The CoRNR-box sequence was previously defined as L.x.x.x.I.x.x.x.I/L [20]; I/L.x.x.I/V.I [21]; L/V.x.x.I/V.I [22]. We identified two putative CoRNR-box like sequences in GEI-8 (Figure 2A). The predicted GEI-8 sequence also contains two glutamine rich regions [23] that also might serve as interaction domains.

Figure 2
Expression analysis of gei-8.

The most conserved N-terminal regions of the GEI-8 related sequences contain both the DAD and SANT domains with their location and the positions of the conserved helices shown in Figure 1. We noted that GEI-8 and related sequences preserve all features known to be essential for correct functioning of NCoR/SMRT as an HDAC-dependent transcriptional corepressor [10] (highlighted in Figure 1). These include the number of helices, their topology, the conserved amino acids needed for the integrity of the structure and for the interaction with HDAC and, most importantly, the K159 residue in the loop between helices H1 and H2 that is indispensable for the activation of HDAC3. The helix H0, known to be very irregular in human SMRT, is probably also present although it contains a two amino acid insertion between the second and third helical turn. Based on the sequence analysis, we concluded that GEI-8 bears all major features identified in other NCoR/SMRT orthologues in annotated genomes from other species and is the NR corepressor and NCoR/SMRT orthologue in C. elegans.

The C-terminal Region of GEI-8 is Capable of Binding GST-NHR-60

In order to confirm functional relatedness of GEI-8 with NCoR/SMRT, we performed a binding assay of the GEI-8 C-terminal domains to GST-NHR-60. NHR-60 is a member of a diversified subfamily of nematode receptors related to HNF-4 alpha and is important for embryonic and early larval development [24]. Mammalian HNF-4 alpha interacts both physically and functionally with SMRT [25] raising the possibility that NHR-60 may similarly interact with GEI-8. We divided the C-terminal region of gei-8 into three domains: I. containing the NR1 binding site (position 2480–3485 in gei-8a isoform), II. containing the sequence between NR bindings sites (position 3413–4389) and III. containing the NR2 binding site (position 4274–5513). As expected from our sequence homology analysis of GEI-8 as it relates to NCoR/SMRT, the C-terminal region I of GEI-8 that includes the predicted NR1 binding site showed affinity to GST-NHR-60 but not to the control protein expressing the GST anchor used for pull-down experiments (Figure S1).

gei-8 Expression

The C. elegans gei-8 gene is located on chromosome III and gives rise to three predicted isoforms with mRNAs ranging from 5.3 to 5.6 kb (WormBase WS195). All predicted isoforms contain two SANT domains that could provide DNA and HDAC interaction functions (Figure 2A and B). Using primers based on predicted cDNA sequences of gei-8 isoforms, we cloned three overlapping regions corresponding to gei-8 cDNAs and confirmed the expression of predicted isoform gei-8a containing both SANT domains and two putative CoRNR-box like motifs (Figure 2A). The gei-8a cDNA clones also revealed that exon 12 can be removed and exon 16 is modified by alternative splicing (Figure 2A); a spliced region of the same location and size as our cDNA clone was also detected by polyA mRNA expression profiling [26]. Depending on the presence or absence of exon 12, the size of gei-8 cDNA is 5043 bp (gei-8d) and 5292 bp (gei-8e), giving rise to either a 1680 or 1763 amino acid long GEI-8 isoforms. We have not cloned the region containing the complete predicted protein encoded by inclusion of exon 16, however, polyA mRNA expression profiling data suggest that this variant is expressed. We confirmed the transcription of the gei-8a 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) and its trans-splicing to SL1 by PCR assays [27]. Expression of gei-8b and gei-8c was not detected using primers directed at predicted exons 1 to 3; our results are consistent with polyA mRNA expression profiling data generated by modENCODE (Figure 2B) [26].

We quantified gei-8 expression in individual embryonic and larval stages by real-time qPCR using cDNA prepared from synchronized populations of wild-type animals. We separately analyzed a region common for all predicted isoforms (gei-8a, b, c) as well as a gei-8a-specific region. We detected expression after probing both regions in all developmental stages at constant relative levels with the exception of the fourth larval (L4) stage where we observed a 2-fold increase for both (Figure 3). We concluded that gei-8a was expressed throughout development, with its late larval increase possibly reflecting expression in the maturing germline.

Figure 3
Normalized expression of gei-8a.

The spatial expression pattern of gei-8 was studied using three different gei-8::gfp constructs based on the predicted start of transcription for gei-8b (promoter 1), the detected start of transcription for gei-8a (promoter 2), and an overlapping region covering both promoters (promoter 3) (Figure 2C). pPD95.69 and pPD95.67 promoterless, nuclear localization signal-containing vectors were used for the promoter 1 and promoter 2 constructs, respectively. Expression from promoter 3 was studied by the PCR fusion-based SOEing approach [28].

The promoter 1 reporter gene consisted of 1.8 kb upstream of the predicted gei-8b start codon and 222 bps of predicted exon 1. Its expression started in embryos at the comma stage in a ubiquitous pattern and was present in all larval stages. In larvae, the expression was detected in pharyngeal and tail neurons, intestinal cells, egg-laying muscles and the anal depressor (Figure 4). The promoter 2 reporter gene construct consisted of 2.3 kb upstream of the predicted gei-8a start codon and included exon 1 and 64 bp of exon 2. The expression of this reporter gene was observed in all larval stages starting at the L1 stage and continuing through adulthood where expression was primarily observed in neurons of the pharyngeal nerve ring, head neurons, tail neurons and the egg-laying muscles. The promoter 3 reporter gene construct contained 6.2 kb upstream of the predicted gei-8a start codon, covering both promoter regions 1, 2 and exons 1, 2 and a part of exon 3; GFP sequences were derived from pPD95.75 by SOEing [28] and did not contain a nuclear localization signal. Expression of this reporter gene started at the embryonic comma stage. Larval expression was detected in pharyngeal neurons, ventral and dorsal nerve cords, tail neurons, egg-laying neurons, and egg-laying muscles. In males, GFP was observed in male-specific tail ganglia and rays. Typical examples of GEI-8::GFP cell- and tissue-specific expression are shown in Figure 4. Taken altogether, our reporter gene expression results defined multiple and distinct cis-acting regulatory regions of gei-8 that drive similar expression patterns that are present throughout development and predominantly in neurons. Expression in the germline would not be revealed by this strategy because transgenes are usually silenced in the germline [29]. However, we noted that gei-8 expression in the germline has been detected by Y. Kohara’s in situ hybridization results accessible in the Kohara in situ database NEXTDB (

Figure 4
Analysis of gei-8 expression using transgenic lines.

Loss of gei-8 Results in Mutant Phenotypes

We obtained the VC1213 strain harboring a gei-8(ok1671) deletion allele generated by the C. elegans Knockout Consortium. The mutation was initially characterized as a 1095 bp deletion/45 bp insertion affecting exons 7 and 8 of gei-8a, removing the intron between them. We verified the size and location of the deletion by PCR genomic amplification from mutant animals and showed that the inserted sequences are identical to a 45 bp region from exon 7 starting at position 1550 of the predicted gei-8a isoform cDNA sequence. Sequencing the gei-8(ok1671) cDNA revealed a stop codon present in the gei-8(ok1671) transcript at position 663, giving rise to a predicted protein containing SANT1 and SANT2 domains, but missing the majority of the putative NR interaction sites at the C-terminus of the protein. The mutant mRNA was detected in homozygous gei-8(ok1671) animals using RT-PCR at levels similar to wild-type animals, suggesting the premature stop codon may be bypassed in some transcripts by alternative splicing or that the premature stop codon is not efficiently recognized by nonsense mediated decay [30]. Thus, truncated GEI-8 protein may be present in homozygous mutant larvae.

The homozygous gei-8(ok1671) animals had obvious phenotypes, including a progressive defect in locomotion starting at the L2 stage that was marked by a delayed response to prodding and a low pharyngeal pumping rate (Figure 5). Compared to wild-type animals of the same age, mutants were also characterized by a shorter maximum body length (750.25 µm, n = 6, SD = 50.59 µm), a convoluted intestine, gonadogenesis defects including loss of the spermathecae, sterility, and arrest at the L4 stage of development (Figure 6 C and D). After outcrossing the original mutant strain to wild-type animals, the heterozygous mutant strain segregated 26.2% (SD = 2.4; n = 2656) affected progeny as described (Table 1). To verify that the observed phenotypes were caused by the ok1671 deletion allele of gei-8, we performed rescue using intact gei-8 genomic DNA. This method has been used previously to generate transgenic animals and to rescue mutant animals [31][34]. Overlapping PCR regions containing a 6 kb putative promoter region plus the complete coding region of gei-8a (Figure 2D) were injected into heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) animals along with pRF4 injection marker, rollers were selected and their progeny were screened for locomotion defects as defined as impaired responses to prodding. The wild-type gei-8 genomic sequences were able to reduce the percentage of affected mutant progeny segregating from heterozygous hermaphrodites from 26.2% to 18.3% (SD = 3.4; n = 7883); this difference was significant using the Student's t-test (p<0.001; SD = 3.16) (Table 1). Importantly, all other mutant phenotypes also showed improvement in the presence of wild-type genomic sequences leading us to conclude that most, if not all, of the defects we observed in gei-8(ok1671) animals were due to disruption of GEI-8 activity.

Figure 5
Analysis of the pharyngeal pumping rate of gei-8(ok1671) mutant animals and controls.
Figure 6
Development of the germline in gei-8(ok1671) mutants and additional phenotypic changes induced by RNAi targeted against Y9C9A.16 (sqrd-2) in homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants.
Table 1
Rescue experiment of gei-8(ok1671) with overlapping amplified regions of genomic DNA injected into the gonads of parents.

We scored 20 gei-8(ok1671) mutant animals for germline development defects using Nomarski optics and DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining of fixed animals. In 19/20 mutant animals examined, distal tip cell (DTC) migration stopped short, reaching only two thirds of it’s normal length of migration on the dorsal side of the animal (Figure 6C and D). In homozygous mutant animals, both gonad arms were underdeveloped, containing fewer meiotic nuclei and germ cells compared to wild-type and heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) control animals. We also failed to detect spermathecae, sperm, or embryos in any mutant animals. We concluded that gei-8(ok1671) mutant germlines are arrested at the L4 stage, before complete gonad elongation and spermatheca development, although some somatic markers of early young adult stages were already present (adult alae, adult vulva). The arrested animals also had a shorter lifespan than wild-type controls. The average lifespan of gei-8(ok1671) mutants at 20°C was 11 days (n = 21, SD = 3.4), which was significantly shorter than the average lifespan of wild type controls (17.4 days, n = 12, SD = 3.9).

Two muscle-related phenotypes were observed in homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants; decreased locomotion on plates and decreased pharyngeal pumping rates. The locomotion defects we observed for gei-8(ok1671) animals on plates prompted us to carry out a thrashing assay. When placed in liquid, wild-type animals bend back and forth moving their head and tail relative to the midbody of the animal in a thrashing motion that can be easily quantitated [35]. In the gei-8(ok1671) mutant strain, this natural thrashing behavior is impaired and deteriorated over the course of development. Unlike wild-type controls, homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants at the L4 stage were not able to perform smooth thrashing. Instead, their movements were spastic and irregular, averaging only 0 to 6 bends per minute at the L4 stage compared to about 250 bends per minute for wild-type animals (n = 10). Similarly, assays of pharyngeal pumping revealed irregular and reduced contraction rates in the homozygous mutants that became progressively worse with age. The average pumping rate in gei-8(ok1671) homozygous animals was 31.8, 17.5 and 5.3 pumps per minute at L2, L3 and L4 stages, respectively (n = 10 for each larval stage), compared to 250 pumps per minute for wild-type animals.

The movement and pharyngeal mutant phenotypes could be due to defects in the functioning of muscle, nerves, or both. To investigate muscle structure, we performed immunostaining using phalloidin and anti-MYO3 antibody directed against contractile apparatus components. Phalloidin stains actin filaments whereas the anti-MYO3 probe recognizes myosin heavy chain-3 [36], [37]. Immunostaining revealed no obvious structural differences between gei-8(ok1671) mutants and wild-type controls (not shown). Yamamoto et al. reported increased mitochondrial oxidative function in C. elegans after gei-8 inhibition by RNAi [13]. We confirmed that finding using MitoTracker Red to visualize the mitochondrial oxidative state; homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants had an average mean density of staining that was more than 2.7 times greater (p<0.001) than that observed in wild-type larvae (Figure S2). Elevated MitoTracker staining could also be visualized in heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants compared to wild-type N2 worms, but was not statistically significant in densitometric analysis of randomly selected progeny of heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) animals with a normal phenotype (which included both heterozygous mutants as well as wild-type animals (Figure S3).

The absence of obvious muscle defects in gei-8 mutants suggested that the locomotion and pharyngeal pumping defects might be due to problems in neurotransmission. We investigated synaptic transmission by assaying animal sensitivity to either aldicarb or levamisole [38], [39]. Aldicarb is a reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that increases the accumulation of acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft causing whole body paralysis and inhibition of pharyngeal pumping. Homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants (n = 64) and wild-type animals (n = 75) at the L4 stage were incubated on NGM plates with 1 mM aldicarb and scored over time for paralysis in three separate experiments. The onset of paralysis occurred significantly earlier in gei-8(ok1671) mutants than in wild-type controls (Figure 7A). Levamisole is a cholinergic agonist that also results in animal paralysis. We performed two experiments with homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants (n = 40) and wild-type animals (n = 40) at the L4 stage on NGM plates with levamisole at a concentration of 1 mM. As in the aldicarb assay, the onset of paralysis occurred significantly earlier in gei-8(ok1671) mutants compared to controls (Figure 7B). Taken together, these results indicate that the gei-8(ok1671) mutation results in abnormal cholinergic signaling, however, it does not distinguish between post-synaptic versus pre-synaptic transmission defects.

Figure 7
Analysis of neuromuscular function of gei-8(ok1671) mutant (VC1213).

gei-8 Loss of Function Leads to Transcription Deregulation

Effects of the gei-8(ok1671) mutation on gene expression were studied with whole genome microarrays (Affymetrix). Changes in gene expression were defined as increased or decreased if statistically significant compared to wild-type controls in at least 2 out of 3 biological replicates. Deregulated genes were analyzed for Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment and clustered according to functional classification using DAVID 6.7 [40] and KEGG pathway tools [41].

Expression microarray analysis revealed 756 probe sets with decreased expression, corresponding with 690 unique Wormbase IDs (Table S1). DAVID classification tools [40] identified 645 IDs using medium classification stringency. GO analysis resulted in 32 clusters with an enrichment score greater than 2 and P<0.05. The list was enriched in spliceosome (29 genes), proteasome (13 genes), cysteine and methionine metabolism (7 genes), and RNA polymerase genes (6 genes) as identified by KEGG pathway analysis. Among specific genes involved are RNA polymerase II and III (Pol II subunits B4, B7, B9 and Pol III subunits AC2 and F09F7.3), spliceosome components (U1 to U6 snRNAs, hel-1 helicase and others), and proteasome subunits (pas-3, pas-4, pbs-1, pbs-3, pbs-4, pbs-6, pbs-7, rpt-1, rpt-2, rpn-2, rpn-5, rpn-8, rpn-12). The most common functional categories over represented by the changes in gene expression were growth, embryonic or larval development and development of reproductive structures. Other clusters include multiple histones and histone-like genes, mitochondrial membrane proteins, sperm structural proteins and hedgehog-like family genes. Interestingly, the set of genes downregulated in gei-8 mutants included several genes required for proper muscle function, including unc-52 (myofilament assembly and/or attachment of the myofilament lattice to the cell membrane), unc-27 (troponin I family), unc-54 (muscle myosin class II heavy chain), pat-10 (body wall muscle troponin C), lev-11 (tropomyosin), mlc-2 (myosin light-chain), and tni-1 (troponin 1). It is unclear if such changes in muscle gene expression contribute to, or are the result of, the defective movement phenotypes we observed in gei-8(ok1671) mutant animals. Depletion of NCoR1 function specifically in mouse muscle resulted in increased muscle mass and mitochondrial function [13], a phenotype opposite to what we observed in worms with reduced GEI-8 activity in all tissues.

Microarray analysis revealed 296 probe sets with increased expression, corresponding to 275 unique Wormbase IDs (Table S2). GO analysis identified 7 clusters with an enrichment score greater than 2 and P<0.05. Enriched clusters included gene annotations for life span and aging, lipid transport and vitellogenin genes, stress response (heat shock and cellular stress), metabolic genes (sugar metabolism, glycolysis), and neuropeptide signaling (including genes coding for neuropeptide like proteins nlp-27 to nlp-32). The KEGG pathway analysis identified six groups including genes involved in glycolysis (8 genes), cystein methionine metabolism (4 genes), galactose metabolism (3 genes), pentose phosphate pathway (3 genes), fructose and mannose (3 genes) and tryptophan metabolism (3 genes).

One of the most significantly affected genes in the gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutants was Y9C9A.16, encoding a predicted mitochondrial sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase, which had an averaged 7.6-fold increase in expression compared to wild-type controls; this increase was confirmed by RT-qPCR. The Y9C9A.16 region is assayed by Affimetrix probe set 184710_at and, interestingly, includes three 21U-RNAs; 21ur-2020, 21ur-11733 and 21ur-9201. To determine if disruption of expression of Y9C9A.16 affected development, we performed RNAi targeted to the spliced mRNA covered by the Affymetrix probe set (184710_at) or only the regions that include 21ur-2020, 21ur-11733 and 21ur-9201. Progeny of parental animals injected with dsRNA targeting the specific regions were scored using Nomarski optics and fluorescent microscopy (DAPI stained). We were not able to identify any specific phenotype of Y9C9A.16 knockdown in wild type animals. However, because the expression from Y9C9A.16 showed a dramatic response to loss of GEI-8 activity, we thought there might be a biological connection between them. We predicted that knockdown of the expression from Y9C9A.16 locus in gei-8 (ok1671) homozygous mutants might revert or modify some of the observed phenotypes; the latter was observed. RNAi-mediated knockdowns targeted to the region covered by the 184710_at probe set and the region containing 21ur-2020, 21ur-11733 and 21ur-9201 induced additional phenotypes in the gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutant background. Additional phenotypes included severe distal tip cell migration defects, irregular gonadal nuclei tumor like accumulation of germline cells and vulval protrusions observed in 13.9% of homozygous gei-8(ok1671) animals treated with Y9C9A.16 RNAi (n = 481) (Figure 6E, F, G, H, I and J and Table 2). Interestingly, Y9C9A.16 has a paralogue in the C. elegans genome, the gene sqrd-1 (sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase). This gene encodes a protein that is identical in size (361 aa) to Y9C9A.16 sharing 266 identical amino acids in its sequence although the genes share very little DNA homology. SQRD-1 expression is regulated by hif-1 in response to H2S and HCN [42], is involved in innate immunity and is associated with numerous 21U-RNAs. RNAi targeted to unique regions of the sqrd-1 coding region, including four 21U-RNAs, resulted in changes in gonad arm migrations and an accumulation of germline cells (4.5% affected, n = 198) that were similar, although less severe, as those observed after Y9C9A.16 RNAi. We concluded that the paralogues encoded by Y9C9A16 and sqrd-1, and perhaps their associated 21U-RNAs, have overlapping roles during development of the germline that can be exacerbated by loss of GEI-8 activity.

Table 2
Induction of additional gonad and body shape phenotypes in homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutant worms by RNAi directed against sqrd-2 or sqrd-1.


GEI-8 is a NCoR/SMRT Orthologue with Developmental Roles in C. elegans

Our results demonstrate that GEI-8 is the C. elegans orthologue of the vertebrate NCoR/SMRT corepressors and that it has essential developmental and transcriptional functions throughout development. GEI-8 has the critical structural motifs necessary for corepressor functions, including the domains for HDAC interaction and activation. Moreover, it is able to interact physically with nuclear receptors through its C-terminal domain that is known to tether NCoR/SMRT to NRs [21], [43], [44]. The identification of the NCoR/SMRT homologue in C. elegans allows us to extend to invertebrates the conserved developmental functions of these important corepressors. Although such links had been previously suggested by the discovery of SMRTER in Drosophila, questions remained because SMRTER was significantly different from the majority of NCoR/SMRT paralogues that had previously been annotated [45]. While the HDAC interacting domain SANT1 is clearly present in Drosophila SMRTER (Figure 1), the second SANT domain is absent. In this respect, C. elegans GEI-8 is more closely related to vertebrate NCoR/SMRT-like NR corepressors than to SMRTER.

We further show that GEI-8 is required for normal development in C. elegans based on our studies of a gei-8 deletion allele that severely truncates or inhibits the protein product. Although expressed, at least at the mRNA level, this mutant allele is predicted to lack the GEI-8 nuclear receptor interacting sites while expressing an mRNA that codes for the domains necessary for HDAC binding and activation. There is no evidence for dominant negative activity of this truncated product as heterozygous animals appear completely wild-type and the introduction of wild-type gei-8 coding regions in transgenic animals partially rescue multiple mutant phenotypes. Therefore, the mutant phenotypes likely represent the loss of function effects for gei-8. Given the early and widespread onset of gei-8 reporter gene expression in embryos, which is also detected by RT-qPCR, it is very likely that GEI-8 functions throughout development and in most, if not all, tissues. The lack of embryonic or early larval defects in homozygous mutants likely reflects the maternal load of gei-8 gene products in the embryo. It is also possible that GEI-8 has multiple functions requiring different amount of GEI-8 activity, with demands for higher levels post-embryonically, including germline development.

The most significant phenotype observed in gei-8 mutants is the late-L4 larval arrest, as revealed by the extent of gonadogenesis and DTC migration. One possibility is that this arrest reflects the depletion of maternally loaded gei-8 products and that in the absence of GEI-8 activity, development and/or cellular processes fail to be executed properly. This interpretation would be consistent with the late developmental defects seen when other essential, maternally provided gene products are exhausted, such as the G1 cell cycle regulators [46][48]. The second most pronounced phenotype in the gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutants is reduced pharyngeal pumping. It is unclear what defect(s) is responsible for this reduced pharyngeal rate given that it is a semi-autonomous action of the pharyngeal muscles that can be stimulated, but does not require neuronal input [49], [50]. One possibility was that food sensation mechanisms were compromised in the gei-8(ok1671) mutants; in the absence of food, the pumping rate of wild-type worms is similar to the rate we observed in the homozygous mutants. However, when tested we found that gei-8(ok1671) mutants exhibited spontaneous chemotaxis towards OP50 lawns until the mutants terminally arrested late in development demonstrating that food sensation mechanisms were intact. Another explanation of reduced pharyngeal pumping is diminished activity of the MC pharyngeal cholinergic neuron and/or its receptor, EAT-2 that regulate pharyngeal pumping in response to food [51], [52]. Such reduced cholinergic signaling is consistent with the sensitivity we observed for gei-8(ok1671) mutants to levamisole and aldicarb. Further experiments are needed to determine exactly which pathways are perturbed and the molecular basis for these aberrations.

GEI-8 Regulates Transcription

Whole genome transcriptional analysis indicates that GEI-8 is required for proper gene expression. Its loss-of-function allele resulted in altered expression of a wide range of genes; genes with elevated expression as well as with decreased expression were identified. However, while GO annotation of many genes that showed decreased expression correlated with the observed phenotypes, genes with increased expression (that could be potentially de-repressed) failed to show an obvious correlation. It is interesting to note that among the set of genes that were decreased in mutant worms were several muscle specific genes. Thus, while bodywall muscle was normal by gross observations with normal appearance, there may be defects in this tissue in homozygous mutants.

The set of deregulated (increased) genes included neuropetide-like protein genes (nlp-27 to nlp-32). The neuropetides that are generated from these genes fall in the subfamily characterized by the sequence YGGW [53] and are related to Aplysia APGW neuropeptides that regulate male reproductive functions [54]; the functional consequences of this, if any, are currently unknown. However, in agreement with results reported by Yamamoto et al. for mice [13], we have detected numerous metabolic genes in the set of genes with increased expression in homozygous mutant worms.

The set of increased genes included several clusters of metabolic genes involved in lipid transport, sugar metabolism, glycolysis, and amino acid metabolism. Several nuclear receptors may be involved in this metabolic regulation. The majority of C. elegans NRs show similarity to HNF4a but some may support metabolic functions dependent on PPARs in vertebrates, as shown for NHR-49 [55]. Moreover, GEI-8 loss of function may be similar in metabolic regulation as shown for SMRT with a single disabled NR site (ID1 or mRID1, respectively) [56], [57]. Interestingly, one of the genes that was increased in gei-8(ok1671) mutants (Y9C9A.16) encodes a sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase that we name sqrd-2. Our results demonstrate that sqrd-2 and gei-8 functions are genetically linked; inhibition of sqrd-2 in homozygous mutants gei-8(ok1671) induces partial reversal of gei-8 mutant phenotypes as well as additional phenotypic changes. We also demonstrated similar reduction-of-function phenotypes for the sqrd-2 paralogue, sqrd-1. Both sqrd genes are associated with 21U-RNAs scattered throughout the non-coding regions. It is intriguing to speculate that the gene expression pattern of gei-8 loss of function may be dependent on this class of regulatory RNAs. 21U-RNAs have been shown to be critical for sperm development and transposon silencing [58]. Both sqrd genes may be linked to their associated non-coding 21U-RNAs that may be localized in mitochondria as part of piRNA biosynthesis [59]. Changes in the mitochondrial compartment induced by gei-8 inhibition as reported by Yamamoto et al. [13] and observed in our experiments on gei-8(ok1671) mutants may also involve piRNAs mediated regulation. The connection to the regulation by 21U-RNAs is supported by our findings that additional changes in the phenotypes of homozygous mutants gei-8(ok1671) are induced by RNAi targeted at sqrd-1 gene. One of the three isoforms of sqrd-1 is predicted to code for a protein with the same length as the protein derived from sqrd-2 and both proteins show 74% identity in amino acid sequences suggesting that these proteins may substitute for each other in function. 21U-RNAs located in sqrd-2 show approximately 50% identity in the conserved cores formed by 16 or 17 bases with piRNAs found in sqrd-1. The levels of these non-coding RNAs, like the activity of sqrd-1 and -2, may be critical for gonad and/or germline development and metabolism. The early embryonic lethality of mice lacking NCoR1/SMRT as well as NCoR2 prevents us from assessing whether the role of GEI-8 in gonadogenesis is an evolutionarily conserved feature [3], [60]. Interestingly, it was recently found that individual 21U-RNAs are regulated by fork-head transcription factors [61]. Moreover, the fork-head factor FoxP1 regulates development in concert with SMRT [62]. These results raise the intriguing possibility that GEI-8 might be directly involved in the transcriptional regulation of 21U-RNAs.

Materials and Methods

Worm Strains

All strains were maintained as described [63] and were grown on standard NGM plates or, in case of RNA isolation, on NGM plates capped with 2% agarose. Wild-type animals were N2 (var. Bristol). The VC1213 strain, kindly provided by the C. elegans Gene Knockout Consortium, carried the gei-8(ok1671) allele over a bli-4 and GFP-marked balancer chromosome; homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants are lethal. Prior to experiments, we outcrossed the VC1213 strain three times to wild-type males. gei-8::gfp transgenic lines were constructed by injecting gei-8 promoter constructs into N2 hermaphrodites as described previously [64].

Total RNA Isolation and cDNA Preparation

Wild-type C. elegans animals were grown on 2% agarose-capped NGM plates, washed with water and frozen at −80°C. After thawing the pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of resuspension buffer (0.5% SDS; 5% 2-mercaptoethanol;10 mM EDTA; 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5) with 15 µl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml)), vortexed for 60 s and incubated at 55°C for 60 min. The sample was phenol-chloroform extracted and ethanol-precipitated, dissolved in water and treated with 1 unit of DNAse (Promega, Madison, WI) per 1 µg of total RNA for 30 min at 37°C. After phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol-precipitation RNA was resuspended in DEPC water. cDNA was synthesized from the isolated RNA using Roche Transcriptor High Fidelity cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with poly-T and gene specific primer 6242 from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of gei-8, or using Superscript II kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with random hexamer primers, all according to protocols by manufacturers.

RNA Interference

Y9C9A.16 dsRNA was synthesized using a 774 bp region of gDNA containing exons 2 to 6 amplified by primers 7501 and 7502 and cloned into pCRII vector (Invitrogen). Prior to in-vitro transcription by T7 or Sp6 polymerases, the construct was linearized. dsRNA was prepared by incubating ssRNAs at 70°C for 10 min and at 37°C for 30 min, followed by phenol-chloroform purification, ethanol-precipitation and dilution in DEPC water. dsRNA was injected into gonads of N2 wild-type hermaphrodites, heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants, and homozygous wild-type progeny of heterozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutant parents. sqrd-1 RNAi was prepared as mentioned above using primers 7605 and 7606.


L4 stage homozygous VC1213 mutants and N2 control animals were put on slides coated with poly-L-lysine, fixed in 5% paraformaldehyde, covered by a cover glass and incubated in a wet chamber for 30 minutes at room temperature. Freeze crack was performed after freezing the sample on dry ice for 5 minutes. Samples were placed in −20°C methanol followed by series of rehydration in methanol:TTBS (9[ratio]1, 7[ratio]3, 1[ratio]1 and 1[ratio]4 10 minutes each). Staining of actin filaments was done using phalloidin labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Samples were incubated with phalloidin (1[ratio]500 dilution) for 40 min and then washed in TTBS three times. Samples were mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (DakoCytomation, Copenhagen, Denmark) and coated with nail polish.

Immunostaining of myosin filaments was performed using anti-MYO3 antibody [65]. After rehydration samples were incubated with anti-MYO3 mouse antibody (1[ratio]200 dilution) for 24 hours at 4°C, then incubated with anti-mouse IgG antibody labeled with Alexa Fluor 568 (1[ratio]400 dilution). Each incubation with antibody was followed by three TTBS washes. Samples were mounted as described above.

Staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)

L4 stage homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants and N2 control animals selected from progeny of injected mothers were put on slides coated with poly-L-lysine and 20 µl of water, covered by a cover glass and put on dry ice. Freeze crack was performed after freezing the sample on dry ice for 5 minutes. Samples were kept in −20°C methanol for 10 minutes, then stained with DAPI (20 µl, 1[ratio]1000 dilution of 1 mg/ml) and mounted with fluorescent mounting medium (DakoCytomation, Copenhagen, Denmark) and coated with nail polish.

Longevity Assays

Longevity assays were performed as described [66] with modification. Adult hermaphrodites were allowed to lay eggs for 4–5 hours. Homozygous gei-8(ok1671 mutants (n = 21) and N2 controls (n = 12) were cultured at 20°C and transferred to a new plate every second day. The vitality of the animals was checked once per day. Death was defined as cessation of pharyngeal pumping or lack of response to prodding.


We used primers designed according to predicted sequences of gei-8 isoforms a, b and c (WormBase WS195). Multiple regions were amplified by Accuprime polymerase (Invitrogen), cloned into TOPO pCRII, pCR4 or XL vectors (Invitrogen) and sequenced (Avant 3100). Selected clones are displayed in Figure 2A and C. Primer sequences are as follows: 107, 7149, 7144, and 6242. The sequences of all primers are in Table S3.

Sequencing the gei-8(ok1671) Allele

The mutation in strain VC1213 was confirmed by single-worm PCR with primers 107 and 307 producing bands of expected sizes for mutant and wild-type worms. The nature of gei-8(ok1671) deletion was confirmed by sequencing these PCR fragments (Avant 3100).

Aldicarb and Levamisole Sensitivity Assays

L4 gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutants and L4 N2 wild-type animals were scored for aldicarb or levamisole sensitivity on NGM plates with 1 mM aldicarb [38] or 1 mM levamisole [39]. The assays were performed at room temperature and scored every 30 minutes until complete paralysis of all animals. Paralysis was defined as cessation of pharyngeal pumping and lack of response to prodding. The score was plotted as the ratio of moving animals to the total number of all animals on the plate.

Locomotion Assays

Thrashing assays were performed in 15 µl of 1× PBS solution on non-adhesive slides. One thrash was defined as a complete swing of the head, for example from left to right and left again. L4 stage VC1213 mutant animals and N2 controls were compared. All worms were allowed to acclimate to the solution for one min prior to scoring. The total number of thrashes was counted in one minute intervals. The pharyngeal pumping rate was counted per minute in well-fed worms in the presence of food at 20°C and VC1213 and N2 controls were compared at the L2, L3 and L4 stages (n = 10 for each stage).

Real-time PCR

Two regions of the gei-8 gene were analyzed for expression using the LightCycler 480 and the LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Region 1 was amplified by primers 6200 and 05/153. Region 2 was amplified by primers 6168 and 01/042. We performed two independent reactions for each region. Reaction conditions were as follows: 5 min pre-denaturation at 95°C followed by 45 cycles amplification (10 s at 95°C, 15 s at 59°C, 15 s at 72°C) and melting curve analyses (5 s at 95°C, 1 min at 65°C and then continuously increasing temperature up to 97°C (temp rate 0,2°C/s)). Data were processed by the LightCycler® 480 software version 1.5. Efficiency values reflected standard curve dilution series, which corresponded to gel-purified ethanol-precipitated PCR products. The Cp values of studied genes were normalized relative to the constitutive gene ama-1 encoding the large subunit of RNA polymerase II [67], [68].

Mutant Rescue

The gei-8 promoter and coding sequence was amplified in two overlapping PCR products RES1 and RES2 with primers 6174 and 6173; 6158 and 6243, respectively. The size of the overlapping region was 191 bp. Both PCR products were mixed together to a final concentration 250 ng/µl and injected with the pRF4 (rol-6(su1006)) dominant marker at 100 ng/µl in VC1213 mutant or wild-type adult hermaphrodites. Rollers were selected from the progeny of injected mothers and kept individually per plate at 16°C until they finished laying eggs. Total progeny were counted and scored for embryonic lethality and the number animals carrying the mutant phenotype [31][34].

GFP Reporters

Transgenic lines expressing gei-8::gfp from putative promoter 1 contains 1832 bp upstream of the translational start codon and 222 bp of predicted exon 1 of gei-8b and c. Putative promoter 2 contains 2300 bp upstream of ATG. Promoter 1 was amplified using primers 01/021 and 4938. Promoter 2 was amplified using primers 5056 and 5060. Promoter fragments were cloned into the GFP vectors pPD95.69 and pPD95.67, respectively and injected into L4 hermaphrodites. Both constructs contained a nuclear localization signal.

Transgenic lines expressing gei-8::gfp from putative promoter 3 were created by a PCR fusion-based approach described by Hobert (2002). A 6.2 kb long putative promoter region of gei-8 was amplified by primers 6228 and 6230. Primer 6230 contains an overhang complementary to the gfp sequence of the pPD95.75 vector. The second product, containing gfp and unc-54 sequences was amplified by standard primers 6232 and 6233 using the pPD95.75 vector as template. The overlapping fusion PCR product was obtained by diluting the two products with water to 10–50 ng/µl and using a 1[ratio]1 mixture as a template for a subsequent PCR reaction with nested primers 6229 and 6234. The PCR fusion product was diluted to a final concentration of 50 ng/µl, mixed with the injection marker rol-6 at 50 ng/µl and injected in N2 adult hermaphrodite animals. GFP expression was selected for until stable expressing lines were established.


C. elegans whole genome expression microarrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) were used to profile gene expression in three independent replicates based on manually selected homozygous gei-8(ok1671) mutants and matched N2 wild-type larvae at the earliest stage when mutants can be easily recognized based on their movement phenotype. Microarray chip data was analyzed by Affymetrix MAS 5.0 suite software (1.6-fold change in mRNA expression) and Robust Multichip Average (RMA) (1.2-fold change in mRNA expression) as part of the Partek genomics suite software package, all with a p-value less than or equal to 0.05. The microarray data has been deposited in the NCBI’s GEO database ( accession number GSE40127.

Detection of Mitochondrial Activity by MitoTracker Labeling

Manually selected worms were transferred to a 10 µl drop of 10 µM MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes) for 2 hr at room temperature (21°C) in PBS and were kept in dark. Worms were transferred in a drop of 20 µl PBS to NGM plate seeded with OP50 bacteria and kept in dark for 2 hr. Worms were then manually transferred to microscopic slides with agarose layer for fluorescent microscopy. For densitometric analysis, L4 larvae were analyzed using the Olympus BX60 microscope with a DP30 camera and pictures recorded at constant settings. For densitometric analysis, pictures of 12 larvae were used (four for each group, N2 wild-type larvae, mutant larvae gei-8(ok1671) determined by their moving phenotype and worms from the progeny of heterozygous gei-8(ok1761) that appeared normal). The total area of 149 000 µm2 was analyzed in total 40 selected areas (excluding areas for determination of background values) using the computer program ImageJ Version 1.42q (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA,, 1997–2011).

GST Pull-down Assay

The complete coding cDNA of NHR-60 [24] (with the exception of the first methionine codon) was amplified by PCR using primers 10/44 and 10/45 and cloned in pGEX-2T vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, UK). The glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was expressed in Escherichia coli (BL-21-strain). For control experiments, the protein domain of GST was expressed from the pGEX-2T empty vector. Overnight cultures of transformed bacteria obtained from a single bacterial colony were cultured in 400 ml of Luria-Broth culture medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin at 37°C overnight. Cultures with O. D. (600 nm) = 0.8 were induced using 1 mM isopropylthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and the cultures were cultivated at 20°C for an additional 5 hr prior to harvesting by centrifugation at 3300×g in a swing out rotor at 4°C for 10 min. The bacteria were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 5 ml of PBS. Bacteria were lysed in 6 ml of Lysis buffer, (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) supplemented with protease inhibitor (1× COMPLETE, Roche, Basel, Switzerland), incubated on ice for 10 minutes with intermittent vortexing and sonicated four times 10 sec. at 80% intensity (Sonicator UP100H, Hielscher Ultrasonics, Teltow, Germany). The lysates were centrifugated at 11180×g/4°C/10 min. The supernatant was removed and filtered using a 0.22 µm filter. Glutathione-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) was prepared by swelling 0.01 g of beads in 1 ml PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.45 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.5). The beads were collected by sedimentation and swelling completed by repeating the swelling step for an additional 5 min. The beads were then resuspended in 100 ul of PBS. The resulting slurry was used for binding of GST or GST-NHR-60. For purification of GST-NHR-60 and GST, 100 µl of slurry (containing 0.01 g of beads), and 300 µl of bacterial lysates were incubated for 30 minutes at 4°C with intermittent mixing (approximately every 4 minutes). The beads were washed four times in 1 ml of PBS Triton X-100 (1%) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO). Beads were collected by sedimentation and resuspended in 500 µl of PBS. The resulting slurry was divided to four aliquots of 100 µl that were used for the binding assay.

The C-terminal domains of gei-8a coding for regions with the putative NR binding sites were amplified by PCR from cDNA and cloned in three constructs in pCR4 or pCRII TOPO-TA cloning vectors (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The three constructs marked as I, II, III were prepared using the following primers and positions in gei-8a isoform (Construct I: 7749, 7750; position 2480–3485, construct II: 7751, 7752; position 3413–4389; construct III: 7753, 7754; position 4274–5513). Constructs I and III included the predicted NR sites, NR1 and NR2 respectively.

35S-radiolabeled proteins were prepared using an in-vitro TNT T7/T3 coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Madison, WI) and 1.48 MBq of 35S-methionine (37 TBq/mmol) (Institute of Isotopes, Budapest, Hungary) in the final volume 50 µl. Ten microliters of the final TNT product was used for binding at 22°C for 30 minutes with intermittent mixing every 4 minutes. The beads were washed 3 times in 1 ml of PBS and resuspended in a final volume of 40 µl of PBS. Subsequently 5 µl of 2 × Laemmli Buffer and 1 µl of beta-mercaptoethanol were added, samples were boiled for 5 minutes and 25 µl were used for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. 10 µl of supernatant was used for determination of 35S-methionine in samples using the Liquid Scintillation Analyzer Tri-Carb 1600 TR (Packard, Meriden, CT) and Ultima-Gold scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). For determination of input in binding experiments, 2 µl of in-vitro transcribed-translated product was resolved using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred on Whitman 3M paper, dried and radioactivity determined in cut stripes containing the translated proteins but not the unincorporated 35S-methionine.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Binding analysis of C-terminal domains of GEI-8 including the predicted NR binding sites to GST-NHR-60. (A). Pull-down experiment of GST (lanes 1 to 3) and GST-NHR-60 (lanes 4 to 6) with in vitro translated proteins covering the C-terminal domains of GEI-8 (GEI-8*) cloned in three constructs: domain I (position 2480–3485 in gei-8a, lanes 1 and 4), domain II (position 3413–4389) lanes 2 and 5 and domain III (position 4274–5513) lanes 3 and 6. The domains I and III contain the predicted NR1 and NR2 binding sites, respectively. (B) Pulled-down radioactivity determined by scintillation detection in the fractions shown in panel A. GST-NHR-60 binds in vitro translated domain I of GEI-8 (lane 4 in panel A and the corresponding bar in panel B) supporting the functional similarity between GEI-8 C-terminal region and NCoR/SMRT. The figure presents one of two experiments that gave similar results.


Figure S2

Elevated mitochondrial activity in mutant gei-8(ok1671) larvae. Control wild-type N2 L4 larvae and progeny of heterozygous mutant in the same developmental stage were stained using MitoTracker staining as described (Materials and methods). Panels A, D, G, and J show N2 control animals; panels B, E, H, and K show progeny of a mutant heterozygous parent that lack the mutant phenotype and represent heterozygous or wild-type larvae; panels C, F, I and L show homozygous mutant larvae, from the same parent. Exposure time was 50 ms in panels A, B and C and 100 ms in all other panels. Panels A to F show the proximal part of larvae; panels G to I show the middle part of the larval bodies and panels J to L show the distal part of larvae. Elevated activity in homozygous animals is apparent in panels C, F, I and L. The scale bar represents 100 µm.


Figure S3

Densitometric analysis of MitoTracker staining expressed in arbitrary units. N2 wild-type animals, and the progeny of heterozygous mutant parents divided according to the mutant phenotype to phenotypically normal heterozygous (+/−) and phenotypically homozygous (−/−) animals were analyzed. Elevated staining by MitoTracker in homozygous mutant larvae is statistically significant in paired Student’s T-test compared to both N2 and morphologically unaffected progeny of heterozygous parents (p<0.01).


Table S1

List of genes with decreased expression in gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutants.


Table S2

List of genes with increased expression in gei-8(ok1671) homozygous mutants.


Table S3

Primers used in the study.



We thank Dr. A. Fire for GFP and L4440 vectors and the bacterial strain used in RNAi.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the following grants: grant 304/08/0970 from the Czech Science Foundation (, grant 0021620806 from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (, Prvouk/1LF/1 and UNCE 204022 from the Charles University in Prague ( PM, JK and KS were partially supported by the grant SVV 2012 264514 from the Charles University in Prague ( KS was partially supported by the Grant 579612 from the Charles University in Prague. MWK is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) of the National Institutes of Health, USA ( The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. No additional external funding received for this study.


1. Horlein AJ, Naar AM, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Gloss B, et al. (1995) Ligand-independent repression by the thyroid hormone receptor mediated by a nuclear receptor co-repressor. Nature 377: 397–404 [PubMed]
2. Chen JD, Evans RM (1995) A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature 377: 454–7 [PubMed]
3. Jepsen K, Hermanson O, Onami TM, Gleiberman AS, Lunyak V, et al. (2000) Combinatorial roles of the nuclear receptor corepressor in transcription and development. Cell 102: 753–63 [PubMed]
4. Goodson M, Jonas BA, Privalsky MA (2005) Corepressors: custom tailoring and alterations while you wait. Nucl Recept Signal 3: e003. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Ogata K, Morikawa S, Nakamura H, Sekikawa A, Inoue T, et al. (1994) Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices. Cell 79: 639–48 [PubMed]
6. Tahirov TH, Sasaki M, Inoue-Bungo T, Fujikawa A, Sato K, et al. (2001) Crystals of ternary protein-DNA complexes composed of DNA-binding domains of c-Myb or v-Myb, C/EBPalpha or C/EBPbeta and tom-1A promoter fragment. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 57: 1655–8 [PubMed]
7. Boyer LA, Latek RR, Peterson CL (2004) The SANT domain: a unique histone-tail-binding module? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 158–63 [PubMed]
8. Yu J, Li Y, Ishizuka T, Guenther MG, Lazar MA (2003) A SANT motif in the SMRT corepressor interprets the histone code and promotes histone deacetylation. Embo J 22: 3403–10 [PubMed]
9. Guenther MG, Barak O, Lazar MA (2001) The SMRT and N-CoR corepressors are activating cofactors for histone deacetylase 3. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6091–101 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Codina A, Love JD, Li Y, Lazar MA, Neuhaus D, et al. (2005) Structural insights into the interaction and activation of histone deacetylase 3 by nuclear receptor corepressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 6009–14 [PubMed]
11. Ahringer J (2000) NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet 16: 351–6 [PubMed]
12. Choy SW, Wong YM, Ho SH, Chow KL (2007) C. elegans SIN-3 and its associated HDAC corepressor complex act as mediators of male sensory ray development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358: 802–7 [PubMed]
13. Yamamoto H, Williams EG, Mouchiroud L, Canto C, Fan W, et al. (2011) NCoR1 is a conserved physiological modulator of muscle mass and oxidative function. Cell 147: 827–39 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Tsuboi D, Qadota H, Kasuya K, Amano M, Kaibuchi K (2002) Isolation of the interacting molecules with GEX-3 by a novel functional screening. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292: 697–701 [PubMed]
15. Hodgson MC, Shen HC, Hollenberg AN, Balk SP (2008) Structural basis for nuclear receptor corepressor recruitment by antagonist-liganded androgen receptor. Mol Cancer Ther 7: 3187–94 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–402 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Biegert A, Mayer C, Remmert M, Soding J, Lupas AN (2006) The MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit for protein sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W335–9 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R (2004) GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res 14: 988–95 [PubMed]
19. Kemena C, Notredame C (2009) Upcoming challenges for multiple sequence alignment methods in the high-throughput era. Bioinformatics 25: 2455–65 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Ogawa S, Lozach J, Jepsen K, Sawka-Verhelle D, Perissi V, et al. (2004) A nuclear receptor corepressor transcriptional checkpoint controlling activator protein 1-dependent gene networks required for macrophage activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14461–6 [PubMed]
21. Hu X, Li Y, Lazar MA (2001) Determinants of CoRNR-dependent repression complex assembly on nuclear hormone receptors. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1747–58 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Malartre M, Short S, Sharpe C (2004) Alternative splicing generates multiple SMRT transcripts encoding conserved repressor domains linked to variable transcription factor interaction domains. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 4676–86 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Michelitsch MD, Weissman JS (2000) A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 11910–5 [PubMed]
24. Simeckova K, Brozova E, Vohanka J, Pohludka M, Kostrouch Z, et al. (2007) Supplementary nuclear receptor NHR-60 is required for normal embryonic and early larval development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Folia Biol (Praha) 53: 85–96 [PubMed]
25. Torres-Padilla ME, Sladek FM, Weiss MC (2002) Developmentally regulated N-terminal variants of the nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha mediate multiple interactions through coactivator and corepressor-histone deacetylase complexes. J Biol Chem 277: 44677–87 [PubMed]
26. Celniker SE, Dillon LA, Gerstein MB, Gunsalus KC, Henikoff S, et al. (2009) Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459: 927–30 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. MacMorris M, Kumar M, Lasda E, Larsen A, Kraemer B, et al. (2007) A novel family of C. elegans snRNPs contains proteins associated with trans-splicing. Rna 13: 511–20 [PubMed]
28. Hobert O (2002) PCR fusion-based approach to create reporter gene constructs for expression analysis in transgenic C. elegans. Biotechniques 32: 728–30 [PubMed]
29. Kelly WG, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Fire A (1997) Distinct requirements for somatic and germline expression of a generally expressed Caernorhabditis elegans gene. Genetics 146: 227–38 [PubMed]
30. Barberan-Soler S, Lambert NJ, Zahler AM (2009) Global analysis of alternative splicing uncovers developmental regulation of nonsense-mediated decay in C. elegans. Rna 15: 1652–60 [PubMed]
31. Maryon EB, Coronado R, Anderson P (1996) unc-68 encodes a ryanodine receptor involved in regulating C. elegans body-wall muscle contraction. J Cell Biol 134: 885–93 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Maryon EB, Saari B, Anderson P (1998) Muscle-specific functions of ryanodine receptor channels in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Sci 111 (Pt 19): 2885–95 [PubMed]
33. Mercer KB, Flaherty DB, Miller RK, Qadota H, Tinley TL, et al. (2003) Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-98, a C2H2 Zn finger protein, is a novel partner of UNC-97/PINCH in muscle adhesion complexes. Mol Biol Cell 14: 2492–507 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Watanabe N, Nagamatsu Y, Gengyo-Ando K, Mitani S, Ohshima Y (2005) Control of body size by SMA-5, a homolog of MAP kinase BMK1/ERK5, in C. elegans. Development 132: 3175–84 [PubMed]
35. Faumont S, Miller AC, Lockery SR (2005) Chemosensory behavior of semi-restrained Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurobiol 65: 171–8 [PubMed]
36. Han HF, Beckerle MC (2009) The ALP-Enigma protein ALP-1 functions in actin filament organization to promote muscle structural integrity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 20: 2361–70 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Glenn CF, Chow DK, David L, Cooke CA, Gami MS, et al. (2004) Behavioral deficits during early stages of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans result from locomotory deficits possibly linked to muscle frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59: 1251–60 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Mahoney TR, Luo S, Nonet ML (2006) Analysis of synaptic transmission in Caenorhabditis elegans using an aldicarb-sensitivity assay. Nat Protoc 1: 1772–7 [PubMed]
39. Gottschalk A, Almedom RB, Schedletzky T, Anderson SD, Yates JR 3rd, et al (2005) Identification and characterization of novel nicotinic receptor-associated proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. Embo J 24: 2566–78 [PubMed]
40. Huang D, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57 [PubMed]
41. Arakawa K, Kono N, Yamada Y, Mori H, Tomita M (2005) KEGG-based pathway visualization tool for complex omics data. In Silico Biol 5: 419–23 [PubMed]
42. Budde MW, Roth MB The response of Caenorhabditis elegans to hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen cyanide. Genetics 189: 521–32 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Cohen RN, Brzostek S, Kim B, Chorev M, Wondisford FE, et al. (2001) The specificity of interactions between nuclear hormone receptors and corepressors is mediated by distinct amino acid sequences within the interacting domains. Mol Endocrinol 15: 1049–61 [PubMed]
44. Privalsky ML (2001) Regulation of SMRT and N-CoR corepressor function. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 254: 117–36 [PubMed]
45. Tsai CC, Kao HY, Yao TP, McKeown M, Evans RM (1999) SMRTER, a Drosophila nuclear receptor coregulator, reveals that EcR-mediated repression is critical for development. Mol Cell 4: 175–86 [PubMed]
46. Park M, Krause MW (1999) Regulation of postembryonic G(1) cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans by a cyclin D/CDK-like complex. Development 126: 4849–60 [PubMed]
47. Fay DS, Han M (2000) Mutations in cye-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans cyclin E homolog, reveal coordination between cell-cycle control and vulval development. Development 127: 4049–60 [PubMed]
48. Boxem M, van den Heuvel S (2001) lin-35 Rb and cki-1 Cip/Kip cooperate in developmental regulation of G1 progression in C. elegans. Development 128: 4349–59 [PubMed]
49. Avery L, Horvitz HR (1989) Pharyngeal pumping continues after laser killing of the pharyngeal nervous system of C. elegans. Neuron 3: 473–85 [PubMed]
50. Albertson DG, Thomson JN (1976) The pharynx of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275: 299–325 [PubMed]
51. McKay JP, Raizen DM, Gottschalk A, Schafer WR, Avery L (2004) eat-2 and eat-18 are required for nicotinic neurotransmission in the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. Genetics 166: 161–9 [PubMed]
52. Raizen DM, Lee RY, Avery L (1995) Interacting genes required for pharyngeal excitation by motor neuron MC in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 141: 1365–82 [PubMed]
53. Nathoo AN, Moeller RA, Westlund BA, Hart AC (2001) Identification of neuropeptide-like protein gene families in Caenorhabditiselegans and other species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 14000–5 [PubMed]
54. Fan X, Croll RP, Wu B, Fang L, Shen Q, et al. (1997) Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding the neuropeptides APGWamide and cerebral peptide 1: localization of APGWamide-like immunoreactivity in the central nervous system and male reproductive organs of Aplysia. J Comp Neurol 387: 53–62 [PubMed]
55. Van Gilst MR, Hadjivassiliou H, Jolly A, Yamamoto KR (2005) Nuclear hormone receptor NHR-49 controls fat consumption and fatty acid composition in C. elegans. PLoS Biol 3: e53. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Yu C, Markan K, Temple KA, Deplewski D, Brady MJ, et al. (2005) The nuclear receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT decrease peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcriptional activity and repress 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 280: 13600–5 [PubMed]
57. Fang S, Suh JM, Atkins AR, Hong SH, Leblanc M, et al. (2010) Corepressor SMRT promotes oxidative phosphorylation in adipose tissue and protects against diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 3412–7 [PubMed]
58. Batista PJ, Ruby JG, Claycomb JM, Chiang R, Fahlgren N, et al. (2008) PRG-1 and 21U-RNAs interact to form the piRNA complex required for fertility in C. elegans. Mol Cell 31: 67–78 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Huang H, Gao Q, Peng X, Choi SY, Sarma K, et al. (2011) piRNA-associated germline nuage formation and spermatogenesis require MitoPLD profusogenic mitochondrial-surface lipid signaling. Dev Cell 20: 376–87 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
60. Jepsen K, Solum D, Zhou T, McEvilly RJ, Kim HJ, et al. (2007) SMRT-mediated repression of an H3K27 demethylase in progression from neural stem cell to neuron. Nature 450: 415–9 [PubMed]
61. Cecere G, Zheng GX, Mansisidor AR, Klymko KE, Grishok A (2012) Promoters recognized by forkhead proteins exist for individual 21U-RNAs. Mol Cell 47: 734–45 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Jepsen K, Gleiberman AS, Shi C, Simon DI, Rosenfeld MG (2008) Cooperative regulation in development by SMRT and FOXP1. Genes Dev 22: 740–5 [PubMed]
63. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71–94 [PubMed]
64. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, et al. (1998) Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391: 806–11 [PubMed]
65. Fire A, Waterston RH (1989) Proper expression of myosin genes in transgenic nematodes. Embo J 8: 3419–28 [PubMed]
66. Lakowski B, Hekimi S (1998) The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13091–6 [PubMed]
67. Kostrouchova M, Krause M, Kostrouch Z, Rall JE (2001) Nuclear hormone receptor CHR3 is a critical regulator of all four larval molts of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 7360–5 [PubMed]
68. Dorak MT (2006) Real-time PCR (Advanced Methods) (Routledge, UK, Abingdon).

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science