PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Child Abuse Negl. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 March 6.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3589583
NIHMSID: NIHMS362465

Epidemiology of abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations in United States children[star]

Abstract

Objectives

(1) To estimate the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma (AAT) hospitalizations among US children age 0–9 years. (2) To identify demographic characteristics of children at highest risk for AAT.

Design

Secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional, national hospitalization database.

Setting

Hospitalization data from the 2003 and 2006 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID).

Main exposure

Frequency and rate of hospitalizations for abusive abdominal trauma as identified by ICD-9CM codes for abdominal trauma and child abuse and E-codes for inflicted injury.

Outcome measures

Hospitalization rates by age, insurance status, and frequency of specific organ injury.

Results

AAT rates were higher for infants than for any other age group, with 17.7 (95% CI 11.7–23.9) cases per million in 2006. More than 25% of all abdominal trauma in children <1 year of age was abusive. For all age groups, rates were higher for males than females, and for children insured by Medicaid compared to those with private insurance. Organs most commonly injured were the liver (64% of hospitalizations), kidney (19%), and stomach/intestines (12%).

Conclusions

Although experts have considered toddlers to be at highest risk for AAT, infants have higher rates of AAT hospitalization. Similar to other abusive injuries, young age, male gender, and poverty are risk factors for AAT.

Keywords: Child abuse, Abdominal trauma, Injury, Epidemiology

Introduction

Approximately 4 per 1,000 children are substantiated victims of physical abuse every year (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). The actual rate of physical abuse may be as much as ten times higher (Sedlack, Mettenburg, et al., 2010; Theodore et al., 2005), as many victims are not identified or reported to child protective service agencies. Abusive abdominal trauma is a particularly severe form of child maltreatment, with injuries including hematomas and lacerations of the liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenal glands, and pancreas, as well as hematomas and perforations of the stomach, intestines, and bladder. Mortality rates of 13–45% make abusive abdominal trauma the second leading cause of child physical abuse mortality after abusive head trauma (Davis, Cohn, & Nance, 1976; Grisoni, Gauderer, Ferron, & Izant, 1984; Barnes et al., 2005).

Studies using convenience samples show abusive abdominal trauma representing anywhere from 0.5 to 11% of physical abuse injuries (Cooper et al., 1988; DiScala, Sege, Li, & Reece, 2000). Studies have also indicated that the estimated percentages of abusive abdominal trauma injuries are highest among toddlers (Cooper et al., 1988; Trokel, Discala, Terrin, & Sege, 2006). While one study in the UK identified an incidence of 2.3 cases per million children age 0–5 years (Barnes et al., 2005), the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma in the US has not been previously studied. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations for all US children age 9 and younger, as well as to examine the incidence by age, gender, and insurance status. Secondary aims were to examine the proportions of specific injuries, and the identity of perpetrators.

Methods

The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) is a database of inpatient hospital stays developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), as a part of its Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). It is the only all-payer inpatient care database for children in the United States, and has been developed to provide national estimates of hospital utilization for children <20 years of age. Data sets are released every 3 years, and each contains a full year of hospitalization data with nearly 3 million pediatric discharges. These include data from 36 states and 3,438 hospitals in 2003 and 38 states and 3,739 hospitals in 2006. Records are at the discharge level, not the patient level; therefore it is possible that the same child may be represented in more than one hospitalization. Systematic random sampling is used to select 80% of non-birth related hospitalizations from each participating hospital. Weights are provided to estimate hospitalization rates for the entire US pediatric population. These discharge weights are based on hospital geographic region, urban/rural location, teaching status, bed size, ownership, and type (e.g., children's or non-children's) (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008).

Specific data elements include up to 15 discharge diagnoses per hospitalization, up to 4 external cause of injury codes (E-codes), patient demographics (age, sex, race, median income of families in the zip code of residence), length of stay, procedures, and discharge disposition, among others. The database has been used by other researchers to examine the incidence of abusive head trauma; rates from the KID were comparable to those of several prospective studies leading the authors to conclude that KID data could be used to estimate the incidence of at least one form of abusive injury (Ellingson, Leventhal, & Weiss, 2008). Our analyses include KID data from 2003 and 2006. This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board.

Hospitalizations for child abuse, abdominal trauma, and abusive abdominal trauma in children age 0–9 years were included in our analyses. We limited our data to children 9 years of age and under as it becomes increasingly difficult in older children to determine whether the injury was inflicted by a caregiver or a peer. Hospitalizations for abdominal trauma were identified by International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9 CM) codes 863.0-869.16 (abdominal organ injury) and 902.0-902.9 (abdominal vascular injury). Abdominal trauma was considered to be present if any of the 15 diagnosis codes contained an abdominal trauma ICD-9 CM code. Injuries to specific organs were determined by individual ICD-9 CM codes. Child abuse hospitalizations were identified by either an ICD-9 code for child abuse (995.5 – child maltreatment syndrome, 995.50 – child abuse unspecified, 995.54 – physical abuse, 995.59 – other child abuse and neglect) or E-code for inflicted injury (E-960-969). Inclusion was not limited to hospitalizations for isolated abdominal trauma; children with extra-abdominal injuries (e.g., abusive head trauma), in addition to their abdominal injuries, were included.

Estimates of the total number of US hospitalizations and 95% confidence intervals for child abuse, abdominal trauma, and abusive abdominal trauma were extracted from KID data, using the weighting incorporated in the database design. Numbers by age, race, and insurance status were also determined. Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using US census data estimates for 2003 and 2006 (US Census Bureau, 2008, 2009). Overall incidence rates were determined for all child abuse, all abdominal trauma, and all abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations; incidence rates of hospitalization by age, sex, and insurance status were also calculated for abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations. Medicaid insurance status was used as a proxy for poverty, as the KID does not contain any direct measures of family income, and Medicaid eligibility requires income below a state-specific threshold. While the KID does provide data on uninsured children, these are not reported because there were few such children in this sample, resulting in wide confidence intervals for incidence estimates. The number and percentage of injuries to each abdominal organ were calculated based on the total (unweighted) number of children with abusive abdominal trauma in the two years of data (n = 234).

Data on race were missing for approximately one third of the sample, primarily because 10 states do not report race data to HCUP. Given the large proportion of missing data, we opted not to examine incidence rates by race.

Results

Based on our weighted estimates (Table 1), among children age 9 years and younger, abusive abdominal trauma accounted for approximately 3.8% (183/4,785) of all child abuse hospitalizations in 2003 and 4.3% (211/4,901) in 2006 (Table 1). Abusive abdominal trauma accounted for 4.8% (183/3,823) and 5.9% (211/3,563) of all abdominal trauma admissions during these years. Abusive injury represented more than one quarter of all abdominal trauma hospitalizations among children <1 year of age (60/216, 27.8% in 2003 and 71/281, 25.3% in 2006). For children between the ages of 1 and 2 years, abusive injury was responsible for 11% (2003) and 18% (2006) of all abdominal trauma hospitalizations.

Table 1
Estimated total hospitalizations for child abuse, abdominal trauma, and abusive abdominal trauma by age – 2003 and 2006.

For all children age 0–9 years, the incidence of hospitalization for abusive abdominal trauma was 4.6 per million children (95% CI 3.5–5.7) in 2003 and 5.3 per million children (95% CI 4.1–6.5) in 2006 (Table 2). The incidence of hospitalization for abusive abdominal trauma was higher among infants than among any other age group, with 14.9 hospitalizations per million infants (95% CI 9.7–20.4) in 2003 and 17.7 per million infants (95% CI 11.7–23.9) in 2006 (Table 2). Among children age 0–4 years, rates were 7.8 per million children (95% CI 5.7–9.8) in 2003, and 9.1 (95% CI 6.9–11.3) in 2006.

Table 2
Abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations – number and rates by age, 2003 and 2006.

Examination of abusive abdominal trauma hospitalization incidence by gender demonstrated higher rates for males versus females among all age groups (Table 3). Male infants had the highest incidence, with 16.6 hospitalizations per million male infants (95% CI 8.3–24.8) in 2003, and 20 hospitalizations per million (95% CI 10.7–29.2) in 2006.

Table 3
Abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations by gender and age – 2003 and 2006.

Marked differences were seen in hospitalization rates by insurance status (Table 4). The incidence of abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations was up to 10-times higher among those receiving Medicaid compared to those covered by private insurance. Hospitalization rates for infants with Medicaid were 40.8 per million children (95% CI 24.1–57.3) in 2003 and 38.1 per million children (95% CI 23.3–52.2) in 2006. In contrast, privately insured infants were hospitalized at a rate of 2.5 per million (95% CI 0–5.9) in 2003 and 3.5 per million (95% CI 0.4–7.1) in 2006.

Table 4
Abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations by insurance status and age, 2003 and 2006.

Liver injuries were the most common injuries (Table 5). Nearly 2/3 of all abusive abdominal trauma hospitalizations involved the liver. Injuries to the kidneys were also common, identified in 19% of hospitalizations. Injuries to the stomach and/or intestines were seen in 12% of hospitalizations.

Table 5
Abusive abdominal trauma–specific injuries N = 234 (unweighted data, 2003 and 2006).

Discussion

Approximately 5 of every million US children age 0–9 years are hospitalized for abusive abdominal trauma each year. These numbers include about 15 hospitalizations per million infants (age <1 year) and 10 per million toddlers (age 1–3 years). As the confidence intervals for 2003 and 2006 incidence rates overlap, there is no clear change in incidence during this time period. While these hospitalizations account for a small percentage (~4%) of all child abuse hospitalizations, they represent a significant proportion of hospitalizations for abdominal trauma among infants and toddlers. Therefore, abuse should be strongly considered when infants and toddlers present with abdominal injuries, unless high velocity trauma, such as a motor vehicle crash, is clearly involved or the event is witnessed by a reliable observer.

Only 1 other study, by Barnes et al. (2005) in the UK, has examined the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma, but not in hospitalized children only. The incidence among children ages 0–4 from the KID data is much higher (~8 per million) than Barnes' calculation of 2.3 cases per million children (95% CI 1.43–3.78). Our data suggest that US children in this age group are much more likely to be victims of abusive abdominal trauma than their British counterparts. The difference in rates between the 2 studies might, however, be due to methodological differences. The Barnes study used an ongoing surveillance program for rare disorders, in which pediatricians returned cards each month noting whether they had identified any children with the listed disorders. Over 2 years, 92% of all cards were returned, suggesting very good ascertainment. However, surgeons were not part of the surveillance program, and the authors do not make clear whether pediatricians were involved in caring for all children with trauma, or only those identified by surgeons as having been abused. If the latter is true, than any instance of abuse that surgeons missed would not be counted. Barnes' data included all children with abusive abdominal trauma, not just hospitalized children, yet still had lower rates than those seen in our US hospitalization data. In addition, our rates are more likely to be underestimates than overestimates, given the known reluctance of physicians to acknowledge and report the possibility of abuse (Flaherty et al., 2006, 2008; Gunn, Hickson, & Cooper, 2005; Jones et al., 2008; Sege & Flaherty, 2008). Differences in these rates do not necessarily reflect overall differences in violence between the 2 countries. While the US has a fourfold higher homicide rate, national statistics indicate that the incidence rates of assault and intimate partner violence are higher in the UK, although, here too, these may involve methodological differences (Coleman, Jansson, Kaiza, & Reed, 2007; Heron et al., 2009; MMWR, 2008a, 2008b; Rand, 2008; Tjaden &Thoennes, 2000; Walker, Flatley, Kershaw, & Moon, 2008).

The highest hospitalization rates in our study were seen among infants, males, and children with Medicaid. Data from earlier studies have suggested that toddlers are the most frequent victims of abusive abdominal trauma (Cooper et al., 1988; Trokel et al., 2006). While the percentage of child abuse injuries caused by abdominal trauma is highest among toddlers, our data indicate that the highest rates of abusive abdominal trauma are seen among infants. The incidence among toddlers is intermediate between that of infants and older children. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to consider the possibility of abuse when evaluating infants with abdominal injuries.

Approximately 25% of abdominal trauma hospitalizations in infants were the result of abuse, according to KID data. While this is a large proportion, it is smaller than the 50% that Trokel et al. (2006) found in their evaluation of data from the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR). This difference could be from better diagnosis of child abuse at pediatric trauma centers (usually located within children's hospitals) compared to community hospitals. Another possibility is that because the KID includes both trauma and non-trauma centers, children with more minor injuries are included; these may be more likely the result of injuries other than child abuse.

By far, the most common injury seen in our data was liver trauma (64% of cases). Wood, Rubin, Nance, and Christian (2005), in a 10 year single-institution retrospective review of abdominal trauma hospitalizations also noted liver injuries to be the most common (92% of cases). However, Barnes et al. (2005) identified liver injuries less often (35%). While 12% of our hospitalizations had injuries to the stomach and/or intestines, these injuries were seen more often in other studies (35–65% of cases) (Barnes et al., 2005; Ledbetter, Hatch, Feldman, Fligner, & Tapper, 1988; Trokel et al., 2006; Wood et al., 2005). Intestinal injuries were, in fact the most common finding in Barnes' et al. (2005) data. These differences may be explained, in part, by differences in data sources. Inclusion of children who died before they could be hospitalized (Barnes et al., 2005) and restricting data to trauma centers (Trokel et al., 2006) would increase the proportion of more severe injuries in the sample. In contrast, data from Wood and the KID database did not include injuries severe enough to result in pre-hospital death, and they included injury hospitalizations that might not necessitate trauma center referral. Because intestinal perforations are more likely to require surgical repair and may more often be fatal; they may be overrepresented in trauma center and mortality data, and underrepresented in general hospitalization data.

Risk factors for abusive abdominal trauma are similar to those seen in other forms of inflicted injury (Keenan et al., 2003; United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010). These risks include young age, poverty, and male gender. Poverty was a particularly pronounced risk factor in our data, with approximately 10-fold higher incidence rates for Medicaid beneficiaries compared to those with private insurance. It is possible that biases in identification of abuse by socioeconomic status account for at least some of the difference in rates by insurance status, as suggested by previous studies (Lane & Dubowitz, 2007; Hampton & Newberger, 1985; Jason, Andreck, Marks, & Tyler, 1982). However, poverty has also been clearly demonstrated as an independent risk factor for maltreatment (Kotch, Browne, Dufort, & Winsor, 1999).

Several limitations to our findings should be noted. First, because the number of abusive abdominal injuries was relatively small, some of our rate estimates were imprecise, particularly for smaller age groupings and older age groups. As with any child abuse data, it is highly likely that cases of abuse were misclassified as accidental injury. Likewise, some cases of accidental injury may have been misclassified as abuse, particularly in minority children. In addition, it is possible that some inflicted injuries in the older children were the result of assault by a peer or non-caregiving adult, and not abuse by a caregiver.

Because race data were missing for 1/3 of the sample, we opted not to include incidence rates by race. While CPS data demonstrate higher rates of minority children in the child welfare system (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010), other data suggest that rates of maltreatment are no different for Black than for White children, or that differences that do exist are the result of confounding by poverty (Sedlack & Broadhurst, 1996; Sedlack, McPherson, & Das, 2010). We therefore felt that including rates of abusive abdominal trauma by insurance status was far more valuable than including rates by race.

While we anticipate that most children with symptomatic abusive abdominal trauma will be hospitalized for their injuries, the KID data do not include children who died prior to reaching a hospital, or who died in a hospital emergency department. Further, abused children may have abdominal injuries that are asymptomatic or associated with minor or vague complaints (Lindberg et al., 2009; Coant, Kornberg, Brody, & Edwards-Holmes, 1992; Lane, Dubowitz, & Langenberg, 2009). Because screening for occult abdominal trauma is not routine practice in all hospitals, it is likely that many cases of occult abdominal trauma are not identified, and therefore not reflected in KID data (Lane et al., 2009).

Despite these limitations, our study is important in that it is the first effort to examine the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma in children in the US. Further, we have demonstrated that infants are at highest risk for abusive abdominal trauma hospitalization, challenging previously held assumptions that toddlers were at greatest risk. Although the incidence of abusive abdominal trauma is lower than in many other maltreatment-related injuries, (e.g., the incidence of abusive head trauma is tenfold higher), it represents a significant proportion of all abdominal trauma injuries. It is therefore important that clinicians consider the possibility of child abuse unless there is a clear history of non-inflicted abdominal injury; missed cases of abuse and failure to protect may lead to escalating trauma and even death (Jenny, Hymel, Ritzen, Reinert, & Hay, 1999).

Abdominal injuries may require long hospitalizations, and result in significant costs to the health care system (Trokel, DiScala, Terrin, & Sege, 2004). The high mortality from abusive abdominal trauma is a substantial problem. Therefore there is a strong need to identify better methods of prevention of abusive abdominal trauma, as well as other forms of maltreatment.

Conclusions

Although experts have considered toddlers to be at highest risk for AAT, infants have higher rates of AAT hospitalization in the US. The possibility of abuse should be strongly considered in infants as well as toddlers with abdominal injuries. In addition, the high proportion of abuse among infants and toddlers hospitalized for abdominal trauma should alert clinicians to suspect abuse in these populations. The high rate of male perpetrators points to the need for child abuse prevention efforts that include male caregivers.

Footnotes

[star]Financial support for this work was provided by the National Institute for Child Health and Development, National Institutes of Health, Grant number 1K23HD055515-01A1, PI – Wendy Lane, MD, MPH.

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Introduction to the HCUP KIDS'Inpatient Database 2006. 2008 Retrieved from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov.
  • Barnes PM, Norton CM, Dunstan FD, Kemp AM, Yates DW, Sibert JR. Abdominal injury due to child abuse. Lancet. 2005;366:234–235. [PubMed]
  • Coant PN, Kornberg AE, Brody AS, Edwards-Holmes K. Markers for occult liver injury in cases of physical abuse in children. Pediatrics. 1992;89:274–278. [PubMed]
  • Coleman K, Jansson K, Kaiza P, Reed E. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London, UK: Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, Home Office; 2007. [Accessed 17.08.09]. Homicides, firearm offences, and intimate violence 2005/2006. Retrieved from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosp0207.pdf.
  • Cooper A, Floyd T, Barlow B, Niemirska M, Ludwig S, Seidl T, O'Neill J, Templeton J, Ziegler M, Ross A, Gandhi R, Catherman R. Major blunt abdominal trauma due to child abuse. Journal of Trauma. 1988;28:1483–1487. [PubMed]
  • Davis JJ, Cohn I, Nance FC. Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal trauma. Annals of Surgery. 1976;183:672–678. [PubMed]
  • DiScala C, Sege R, Li G, Reece RM. Child abuse and unintentional injuries: A 10-year retrospective. Archives of Pediatrics Adolescent Medicine. 2000;154:16–22. [PubMed]
  • Ellingson KD, Leventhal JM, Weiss HB. Using hospital discharge data to track inflicted traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;34:S157–S162. [PubMed]
  • Flaherty EG, Sege R, Price LL, Christoffel KK, Norton DP, O'Connor KG. Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: Results from a national survey of pediatricians. Child Maltreatment. 2006;11:361–369. [PubMed]
  • Flaherty EG, Sege RD, Griffith J, Price LL, Wasserman R, Slora E, Dhepyasuwan N, Harris D, Norton D, Angelili ML, Abney D, Binns HJ. From suspicion of physical child abuse to reporting: Primary care clinician decision-making. Pediatrics. 2008;122:611–619. [PubMed]
  • Grisoni ER, Gauderer MW, Ferron J, Izant RJ. Nonoperative management of liver injuries following blunt abdominal trauma in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1984;19:515–518. [PubMed]
  • Gunn VL, Hickson GB, Cooper WO. Factors affecting pediatricians' reporting of suspected child maltreatment. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2005;5:96–101. [PubMed]
  • Hampton RL, Newberger EH. Child abuse incidence and reporting by hospitals: Significance of severity, class, and race. American Journal of Public Health. 1985;75:56–60. [PubMed]
  • Heron M, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Tejada-Vera B. 14. Vol. 57. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2009. [Accessed 17.08.09]. Deaths: Final data for 2006. National vital statistics reports. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_14.pdf.
  • Jason J, Andreck ND, Marks J, Tyler CW. Child abuse in Georgia: A method to evaluate risk factors and reporting bias. American Journal of Public Health. 1982;72:1353–1358. [PubMed]
  • Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. Journal of American Medical Association. 1999;281:621–626. [PubMed]
  • Jones R, Flaherty EG, Binns HJ, Price LL, Slora E, Abney D, Harris DL, Christoffel KK, Sege RD. Clinicians' description of factors influencing their reporting of suspected child abuse: Report of the Child Abuse Reporting Experience Study Research Group. Pediatrics. 2008a;122:259–266. [PubMed]
  • Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW, Nocera MA, Merten DF, Sinal SH. A population-based study of inflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. Journal of American Medical Association. 2003;290:621–626. [PubMed]
  • Kotch JB, Browne DC, Dufort V, Winsor J. Predicting child maltreatment in the first 4 years of life from characteristics assessed in the neonatal period. Child Abuse & Neglect. 1999;23:305–319. [PubMed]
  • Lane WG, Dubowitz H. What factors affect the identification and reporting of child abuse-related fractures? Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research. 2007;461:219–225. [PubMed]
  • Lane WG, Dubowitz H, Langenberg P. Screening for occult abdominal trauma among children with suspected physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1595–1602. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0904. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Ledbetter DJ, Hatch EI, Feldman KW, Fligner CL, Tapper D. Diagnostic and surgical implications of child abuse. Annals of Surgery. 1988;123:1101–1105. [PubMed]
  • Lindberg D, Makaroff K, Harper N, Laskey A, Bechtel K, Deye K, Shapiro R. Utility of hepatic transaminases to recognize abuse in children. Pediatrics. 2009;124:509–516. [PubMed]
  • Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence, US 2005. MMWR. 2008;57(05):113–117. [PubMed]
  • Errata: Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence, US, 2005. MMWR. 2008b;57(09):235. [PubMed]
  • Rand MR. Criminal victimization, 2007 Bureau of justice statistics bulletin National crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice; 2008. [Accessed 17.08.09]. Retrieved from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cv07.pdf.
  • Sedlack AJ, Broadhurst DD. The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-3) Final Report. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 1996.
  • Sedlack AJ, Mettenburg J, Basena M, Petta I, McPherson K, Greene A, Li S. Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-4): Report to congress. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2010.
  • Sedlack AJ, McPherson K, Das B. Supplementary analyses of race differences in child maltreatment rates in the NIS-4. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2010.
  • Sege RD, Flaherty EG. Forty years later: Inconsistencies in reporting of child abuse. Archives of Disease in Child. 2008;93:822–824. [PubMed]
  • Theodore AD, Chang JJ, Runyan DK, Hunter WM, Bangdiwala SI, Agans R. Epidemiologic features of the physical and sexual maltreatment of children in the Carolinas. Pediatrics. 2005;115:331–337. [PubMed]
  • Tjaden P, Thoennes N. The extent, nature, and consequences of IPV: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, July 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2000. [Accessed 17.08.09]. Retrieved from: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/181867.htm.
  • Trokel M, DiScala C, Terrin NC, Sege RD. Blunt abdominal injury in the young pediatric patient: Child abuse and patient outcomes. Child Maltreatment. 2004;9:111–117. [PubMed]
  • Trokel M, Discala C, Terrin NC, Sege RD. Patient and injury characteristics in abusive abdominal injuries. Pediatric Emergency Care. 2006;22(10):700–704. [PubMed]
  • US Census Bureau. [Accessed on 08.11.09];Projected population by single year of age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States: July 1, 2000 to July 1, 2050. 2008 Retrieved from: < www.census.gov/population/www/projections/files/nation/download/NP2008_D1.xls-2008-08-13>.
  • US Census Bureau. [Accessed 08.10.09];Health insurance Current population survey (CPS) table creator. 2009 Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthins/data_access.html.
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Child Maltreatment 2009. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2010. Administration for Children and Families.
  • Walker A, Flatley J, Kershaw J, Moon D. Crime in England and Wales 2008/9 Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London, U.K: Research, Development, and Statistics Directorate, Home Office; 2008. [Accessed 17.08.09]. Retrieved from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb1109vol1.pdf.
  • Wood J, Rubin DM, Nance ML, Christian CW. Distinguishing inflicted versus accidental abdominal injuries in young children. Journal of Trauma. 2005;59:1203–1208. [PubMed]