Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmriBioMed Research International
Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 570158.
Published online 2013 January 20. doi:  10.1155/2013/570158
PMCID: PMC3581293

Sex-Associated Expression of Co-Stimulatory Molecules CD80, CD86, and Accessory Molecules, PDL-1, PDL-2 and MHC-II, in F480+ Macrophages during Murine Cysticercosis


Macrophages are critically involved in the interaction between T. crassiceps and the murine host immune system. Also, a strong gender-associated susceptibility to murine cysticercosis has been reported. Here, we examined the sex-associated expression of molecules MHC-II, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 on peritoneal F4/80hi macrophages of BALB/c mice infected with Taenia crassiceps. Peritoneal macrophages from both sexes of mice were exposed to T. crassiceps total extract (TcEx). BALB/c Females mice recruit higher number of macrophages to the peritoneum. Macrophages from infected animals show increased expression of PDL2 and CD80 that was dependent from the sex of the host. These findings suggest that macrophage recruitment at early time points during T. crassiceps infection is a possible mechanism that underlies the differential sex-associated susceptibility displayed by the mouse gender.

1. Introduction

Gender of the host influences the outcome of many parasitic diseases. For example, in Leishmania major infection, female mice mount a strong Th1 response and resolve the infection. In contrast, male mice mount a Th2-dominant response and develop chronic lesions [1]. In other protozoan infections, such as toxoplasmosis, an opposite finding was observed: female mice succumb to Toxoplasma gondii infection despite a Th1 response, whereas male mice display resistance and survive for a longer period of time to similar challenges [2].

In helminth infections, the gender of the host also plays an important role in the outcome of the infection by inducing different responses depending on the sex [3, 4]. In contrast to the well-described adaptive immunity against these helminthic infections, the role of macrophages (Mϕs) is still unclear. There have been only limited studies on the macrophage response to helminth-derived antigens and the impact of these responses on the outcome of the infection is not known. Much lesser information exists in relation to the role of sex on the macrophage response to helminth-derived antigens.

A sexual dimorphism exists in the acquired immune response against different pathologies and in many autoimmune diseases, which suggests a linkage between the immune and reproductive endocrine system [5]. Moreover, reciprocal endocrine interactions between host and parasite are a strong factor that has an influence in parasite success [6, 7].

Experimental murine cysticercosis caused by Taenia crassiceps [8, 9] is well known as a manageable experimental system which explores the role of biological factors involved in host susceptibility [10]. Interestingly, in T. crassiceps cysticercosis, females of all strains of mice studied sustain larger intensities of infection than males [11]. At the same time, the cellular immune response (Th1) is markedly diminished in both sexes, and the humoral response is enhanced (Th2) [12]. Estradiol is involved in the immunoendocrine regulation of murine T. crassiceps cysticercosis as a major protagonist in promoting cysticercus growth by interfering with the thymus dependent cellular immune mechanisms that obstruct parasite growth [13]. Gonadectomy alters this resistance pattern and makes intensities equal in both sexes by increasing that of male mice and diminishing it in female mice [14]. In addition, the hormonal substitution of gonadectomized males and reconstitution of female mice with 17β-estradiol increased parasite loads [13]. Also, specific splenocyte cell proliferation, IL-2, and IFN-γ production were depressed in gonadectomized-parasitized mice of both genders, and after the reconstitution with testosterone or dihydrotestosterone, there was a significant recovery of the splenocyte proliferation and Th1 cytokine production on these animals. On the other hand, mice treated with estradiol were not able to induce these cellular responses [15].

Macrophages are phagocytic cells that are widely distributed on the organism and have an important role in the maintenance of the homeostasis [16]. These cells are involved in T cell activation through antigen presentation by the expression of MHC molecules and costimulatory/inhibitory molecules. It has been demonstrated that the expression of MHC molecules and the expression of costimulatory molecules such as B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) could modulate T cell activation and Th1/Th2 polarization during infection and autoimmunity [17, 18]. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death ligand 2 (PD-L2) have been related to alternate activated phenotype in macrophages induced during Taenia crassiceps infection [19]. Macrophages also have a broad participation in the development of the immune response to many pathogens, particularly to helminthes [20] by polarizing T helper (Th) cells activation in Th1 or Th2, and also have a role in tissue remodeling and wound repair [21]. In the context of immunoendocrine communication, it has been shown that sex steroids are able to modulate survival of human macrophages cell lines [22], the recruitment of macrophages to the site of inflammation, and their effector functions [23]. As occurred with other immune cells, the effect of sex steroids on macrophages depends on the concentration, type, and the context in which macrophages are studied [24]. Furthermore, it has been previously established that sex steroid effects on macrophages depend on the expression of the androgen receptor (AR) [25, 26], progesterone receptor (PR) [27], and both types of estrogen receptor (ERα y ERβ) [28].

Since macrophages have been importantly involved in susceptibility/resistance in murine cysticercosis and also can be modulated by sex steroids, we evaluated and compared the response of molecules of early activation of recruited F4/80hi macrophages, such as MHC-II, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in both gender infected mice. Our results showed that indeed there is a differential expression of these molecules in female and male mice and that this could partially impact the different sex-associated susceptibility to cysticercosis in mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The Animal Care and Use Committee at the Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas evaluated animal care and experimentation practices according to the official Mexican regulations (NOM-062-ZOO-1999) in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (NIH and the Weatherall Report) of the USA. The Ethics Committee of the Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas approved this protocol (Permission Number 2009-13).

2.2. Animals and Experimental Infections

Male and female BALB/cAnN (H2-d) inbred mice obtained from Harlan (Mexico City) were used in all experiments. Animals were housed in the animal care facilities at Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, (UNAM), under controlled conditions of temperature and 12 h dark-light cycles with lights on between 0700 and 1900. They were fed Purina Diet 5015 (Purina, St. Louis, MO) and given tap water ad libitum.

2.3. Aantigen Extraction and Infection

Metacestodes of Taenia crassiceps of the ORF strain were harvested in aseptic conditions from the peritoneal cavity of female BALB/cAnN mice after 4 months of infection. Metacestodes were washed with cold sterile saline (Solución CS, Laboratorios PISA. S.A. de C.V. [NaCl 0.9%]). T. crassiceps soluble extract (TcEx) was prepared in cold aseptic conditions, homogenizing whole metacestodes (30 mL volume) with tree pulses of 60 Hz with a duration of 1 s, by using an ultrasonic homogenizer (Vibracell, SONICS & MATERIALS, Newtown, USA). The homogenates were centrifuged at 20,000 g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatants containing saline-soluble antigens were collected and frozen at −20°C until further use. Protein concentration was estimated by Bradford protein kit assay (BioRad). Sex-and age-matched mice were infected by intraperitoneal (ip) injection with 20 small (approximately 2 mm) nonbudding cysticerci/300 μL saline, with 400 μg TcEx in 300 μL saline or 300 μL saline as control. Six days after-injection, animals were sacrificed by inhalation of an overdose of sevoflurane (Sevorane; Abbott) and peritoneal cells were collected for analysis.

2.4. Isolation of Peritoneal Macrophages

Peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) were obtained from saline, TcEx-treated, or 6-day-T. crassiceps infected mice (BALB/c male or female) by peritoneal lavage with 7 mL of sterile ice-cold saline (Laboratorios PISA. S.A. de C.V. [NaCl 0.9%]). The cells were washed twice with cold PBS. After two washes, the viable cells were counted by trypan blue exclusion with a Neubauer hemocytometer. Viable cells were counted and adjusted to 1 × 106 cells/mL. Viability was measured by trypan blue exclusion. Routinely viability was around over 95%.

2.5. Analysis of Cell Surface Markers in Macrophages

The surface expression of macrophage markers was analyzed using multicolor flow cytometry. Mϕs were suspended in cold PBS containing 2% FCS and 0.02% NaN3. The Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 for 20 min at 4°C. The cells were washed and triple stained with an APC-conjugated mAbs against F4/80, PE-conjugated mAbs against CD86 or PD-L2, PerCP-conjugated IA/IE (MHC-II), PE-Cy5-conjugated CD80 or Biotin-conjugated PD-L1, and PE-Cy5-conjugated Streptavidin. All Abs were purchased from BioLegend (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). A gate including high forward light scatter (FSC)/high side light scatter (SSC) cells was generated and in that gate the different markers were analyzed. The stained cells were captured using a FACsCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and data analyzed with the FlowJo (Tree Star) software. Absolute numbers in all assays were calculated according to the percentage of positive macrophages and the total numbers of PECs.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data of the three replications of each experiment were pooled and expressed as their average. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with sex (2 levels) and number of experiment (3 levels) as independent variables and as dependent variables: the total number of developed cysticerci and the expression of each molecule. If significant differences between treatments were found by ANOVA, differences between the group means were assessed within each experiment by means of Tukey test using the residual variance estimated by ANOVA to test for significance. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

3. Results

In order to determine the role of sex during early infection, mice of both sexes were infected and sacrificed 6 days after-infection. As previously reported [29], at this time point of infection, there is no statistical difference in parasite loads between males and females, though there is a slight trend in males to have less parasites than females (Figure 1). This result is also consistent with the observation that sexual dimorfism begins after the first week of infection in BALB/c mice [30].

Figure 1
Parasite load obtained of Female (F) and male (M) mice. Data show the number of parasites recovered from the peritoneal cavity at 6 days post-infection. At this time of infection, animals did not show the typical sexual dimorphism of this infection observed ...

To detect the presence of Mϕs and to look for a difference in the number of total Mϕs during early infection, we analyzed the population of PECs recruited to the peritoneal cavity (site of infection) of saline-treated, TcEx, and infected mice of both sexes. Total PECs recruitment in infected male mice is decreased (P < 0.05) compared to infected females, while treatment with saline solution or TcEx did not affect the total number of PECs recruited (Figure 2(a)). Since Mϕs have been previously involved in the susceptibility/resistance to murine cysticercosis, we decided to analyze their percentage (Figure 2(b)) and their total number (Figure 2(c)), defined by their high expression of F4/80 (F4/80hi). We found no differences in the percentage of F4/80hi cells between sexes (Figure 2(b)), but there was a marked increase in the total number of Mϕs detected in infected females with respect to infected males. This difference was not observed in the other treatments (Figure 2(c)).

Figure 2
Kinetics of total peritoneal exudate cells (PECs) recovered from the peritoneum after T. crassiceps infection. (a) Peritoneal cells were isolated from male and female BALB/c at 6 days after infection with twenty cysticerci. Without any additional stimulation, ...

To characterize the phenotype of Mϕs recruited of the peritoneal cavity of infected mice of both sexes, we look for the expression of MHC-II (Figure 3), CD80/CD86 (Figure 4), and PD-L1/PD-L2 (Figure 5) by flow cytometry. In Figure 3(a), the percentage of MHC-II+ cells found is depicted. There is no difference associated to treatment or sex, in the percentage of Mϕs expressing these molecule. However, as seen in the total number of PECs of infected female mice, the total number of Mϕs MHC-II+ is also increased (Figure 3(b)). As for the relative mean intensity of the expression of MHC-II (a measure of the amount of the total MHC-II per cell), there is no difference between animals, either by treatment or sex (Figure 3(c)).

Figure 3
MHC-II characterization in Mϕs recovered from the peritoneum after T. crassiceps infection. MHC-II expression was determined on Mϕs (F4/80hi) recruited after 6 days of infection with 20 cysts of T. crassiceps. The percentage (a), total ...
Figure 4
CD80/CD86 characterization in Mϕs recovered from the peritoneum after T. crassiceps infection. Costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 expression was determined on Mϕs (F4/80hi) recruited after 6 days of infection with 20 cysts of T. crassiceps ...
Figure 5
PD-L1/PD-L2 characterization in Mϕs recovered of the peritoneum after T. crassiceps infection. Inhibitory molecule, PD-L1, and PD-L2 expression was determined on Mϕs (F4/80hi) recruited after 6 days of infection with 20 cysts of T. crassiceps ...

In Figure 4, the analysis of the expression of CD80 and CD86 is plotted. There were no differences associated to sex in the percentage of Mϕs expressing CD80 or CD86 (Figures 4(a) and 4(d)). However, there is a marked difference in the total number of CD80+ or CD86+ Mϕs that is observed in infected mice; female mice show an increased number of this population when compared to male mice (Figures 4(b) and 4(e)). We also compared the relative mean intensity (MSR) of the expression of these molecules, in terms to define differences in the coestimulatory ability of these cells. We found no differences between male and female mice in terms of CD80 expression either by treatment or sex (Figure 4(c)). However, CD86 appeared less expressed in male mice than in female mice, even when these data did not show significance (Figure 4(f)).

Finally we look for differences in the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 inhibitory molecules. As shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(d), there were no differences in the percentage of PD-L1 or PD-L2 expressing Mϕs among males and females, but there were differences among treatment: infection induced a higher expression of PD-L1/2 than TcEx. As observed for CD80/86, there were also higher numbers of PD-L1- or PD-L2-positive Mϕs in infected female mice than in infected male mice (Figures 5(b) and 5(e)); but there were no changes in the expression of these molecules on Mϕs (Figures 5(c) and 5(f)).

4. Discussion

Given the reported importance of sex- and pregnancy-associated hormones in the establishment and outcome of parasitic diseases, this is an area of research that is likely to grow. The important role that sex steroids plays during murine cysticercosis has been previously demonstrated in experiments in which gonadectomy, thymectomy, and whole body irradiation showed that both the endocrine and immune systems of the mice were involved in the parasite load differences between the host sexes. Interestingly orchidectomy in male mice raises parasite loads while ovariectomy has the opposite effect; it increased them 3-fold [14]. Thymus hindered parasite reproduction in both sexes but more so in males than in females, thus tending to equalize the number of parasites in thymectomized mice of both sexes [31].

Macrophages play a key role in directing the host immune response to parasites and they can also function as effector cells. The recruitment and activation of macrophages by helminth-derived molecules initiate with the expression of accessory molecules. These immune mediators play crucial roles in the development of immunity against a variety of pathogens, but their role in helminthic infections is less well understood [32, 33]. In this study, we found an increased number of recruited macrophages from T. crassiceps-infected female BALB/c mice in comparison with male mice and expressed MHC-II, the coestimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and the accessory molecules PD-L1 and PD-L2. However, the major difference that we found was associated to infection, though a clear difference in the number of parasites did not exist. There were more Mϕs in infected females compared to those observed in infected males after similar stimulation. These data are consistent with the susceptible phenotype observed in IL-12 KO mice [34] and suggest a major role for macrophages in cysticercosis. The mechanism underlying the differential expression of MHC-II, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in our system remains to be elucidated; however, it may be associated with an impaired intracellular signaling in BALB/c male mice but not in female mice.

The relevance of these observations is highlighted by the finding that macrophages from BALB/c female mice became more rapidly alternatively activated in T. crassiceps chronic infection, whereas macrophages from male mice presented a transient and incomplete alternate activation during early infection [35]. Thus, the presence and the persistence of AAMϕ are another striking difference between the susceptible and resistant sex of mice to T. crassiceps infection.

In the context of immunoendocrine communication, it has been previously established that macrophages express the androgen receptor (AR) [25, 26], progesterone receptor (PR) [27], and both types of estrogen receptor (ERα y ERβ) [28]. It has been shown that sex steroids are able to modulate survival of human macrophages cell lines [22], the recruitment of macrophages to the site of inflammation [23], and their effector functions. As occurred with other immune cells, the effect of sex steroids on macrophages depends on the concentration, type, and the context in which macrophages are studied [24].

For instance, in the murine model of incisional wound, gonadectomy of females is associated to an increased inflammation and delay in wound healing. This effect is due to the fact that ovariectomy induces an increase in the secretion of TNF-α and MIF, as well as in the number of infiltrated macrophages at the site of the lesion. Also, the percentage of alternatively activated macrophages is decreased [23, 36]. If castrated females are reconstituted with E2 concentrations observed during estrous, then the production of TNF-α, MIF, and the total number of infiltrated macrophages in the wounds are decreased. However, treatment with physiological levels of progesterone has a modest effect, in comparison to the effect induced by estradiol, on the same parameters studied [23]. Moreover, sex steroides regulate the production of nitric oxide (NO) by macrophages, in a dichotomic way. At low concentrations, E2 stimulates the secretion of NO by LPS-activated macrophages in vitro; however, at high concentrations of E2, there is a decrease of NO [37, 38]. Furthermore, estradiol and to a lesser extent progesterone decrease the activity of the enzyme catalase, a very important modulator of the NO synthesis [39]. As such, these data may represent an important mechanism underlying the immunomodulating effects of sex steroids.

Previously, we showed that during murine cysticercosis, an impressive feminization process is produced in the male host, characterized by an increase in serum estradiol level of 200 times above their normal value, roughly similar to those of normal females, while those of testosterone decreased by 90% relative to controls [29]. These changes in the hormonal milieu of the host equalize the parasite loads between genders. In the same way, progesterone treatment tends to equalize parasite loads in females and males, which suggests that other gonad-associated factors are involved in the control of parasite growth. Therefore, a more intricate strategy of parasite activity has to be considered. Perhaps, high estrogen levels are the main feature of this intriguing puzzle, since, in males, the parasite loads increased more markedly than in females. We suppose that expression of costimulatory molecules early during infection could be differential, and this fact impacts the parasite loads that are different among males and females, late during infection. This hypothesis was tested in this study and found that always females have higher expression of MHC-II, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 during infection, but not in response to saline or TcEx. Interestingly, estradiol concentrations are higher in infected females early in infection [29].

5. Conclusion

In summary, the results presented here demonstrate that recruitment and expression of MHC-II, CD80, CD86, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in Mϕ of peritoneal cavity in T. crassiceps early at infection is associated to the sex of the host, although at the time of infection the number of parasites does not differ between both sexes. Whatever the cysticercosis-relevant “sex steroid target” may prove to be, the fact steroids positively may interfere with the development of protective immune mechanisms against Taenia crassiceps cysticerci has an important implication for future vaccine and vaccination trials, among others projections.


Financial support was obtained by Grant number IN214011 from Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Inovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT), of the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA), from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) to J. Morales-Montor. C. Togno-Peirce had a Ph.D. fellowship from CONACyT, México, and from UNAM. K. Nava-Castro is a Postdoctoral Fellow from DGAPA, U.N.A.M.


1. Satoskar A, Alexander J. Sex-determined susceptibility and differential IFN-γ and TNF-α mRNA expression in DBA/2 mice infected with Leishmania mexicana . Immunology. 1995;84(1):1–4. [PubMed]
2. Liesenfeld O, Nguyen TA, Pharke C, Suzuki Y. Importance of gender and sex hormones in regulation of susceptibility of the small intestine to peroral infection with Toxoplasma gondii tissue cysts. Journal of Parasitology. 2001;87(6):1491–1493. [PubMed]
3. Nava-Castro K, Hernández-Bello R, Muñiz-Hernández S, Camacho-Arroyo I, Morales-Montor J. Sex steroids, immune system, and parasitic infections: facts and hypotheses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012;1262(1):16–26. [PubMed]
4. Poulin R. Helminth growth in vertebrate hosts: does host sex matter? International Journal for Parasitology. 1996;26(11):1311–1315. [PubMed]
5. Besedovsky HO, del Rey A. Immune-neuro-endocrine interactions: facts and hypotheses. Endocrine Reviews. 1996;17(1):64–102. [PubMed]
6. Morales-Montor J, Baig S, Mitchell R, Deway K, Hallal-Calleros C, Damian RT. Immunoendocrine interactions during chronic cysticercosis determine male mouse feminization: role of IL-6. Journal of Immunology. 2001;167(8):4527–4533. [PubMed]
7. Morales-Montor J, Escobedo G, Vargas-Villavicencio JA, Larralde C. The neuroimmunoendocrine network in the complex host-parasite relationship during murine cysticercosis. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2008;8(5):400–407. [PubMed]
8. Culbreth KL, Esch GW, Kühn RE. Growth and development of larval Taenia crassiceps (Cestoda). III. The relationship between larval biomass and the uptake and incorporation of 14C-leucine. Experimental Parasitology. 1972;32(2):272–281. [PubMed]
9. Freeman RS. Studies on responses of intermediate host to infection with Taenia crassiceps (Zeder, 1800) (Cestoda) Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1964;42(3):367–385.
10. Sciutto E, Fragoso G, Larralde C. Taenia crassiceps as a model for Taenia solium and the S3Pvac vaccine. Parasite Immunology. 2011;33(1):79–80. [PubMed]
11. Fragoso G, Meneses G, Sciutto E, Fleury A, Larralde C. Preferential growth of Taenia crassiceps cysticerci in female mice holds across several laboratory mice strains and parasite lines. Journal of Parasitology. 2008;94(2):551–553. [PubMed]
12. Terrazas LI, Bojalil R, Govezensky T, Larralde C. Shift from an early protective TH1-type immune response to a late permissive TH2-type response in murine cysticercosis (Taenia crassiceps) Journal of Parasitology. 1998;84(1):74–81. [PubMed]
13. Terrazas LI, Bojalil R, Govezensky T, Larraide C. A role for 17-β-estradiol in immunoendocrine regulation of murine cysticercosis (Taenia crassiceps) Journal of Parasitology. 1994;80(4):563–568. [PubMed]
14. Huerta L, Terrazas LI, Sciutto E, Larralde C. Immunological mediation of gonadal effects on experimental murine cysticercosis caused by Taenia crassiceps metacestodes. Journal of Parasitology. 1992;78(3):471–476. [PubMed]
15. Morales-Montor J, Baig S, Hallal-Calleros C, Damian RT. Taenia crassiceps: androgen reconstitution of the host leads to protection during cysticercosis. Experimental Parasitology. 2002;100(4):209–216. [PubMed]
16. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011;11(11):723–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Salomon B, Bluestone JA. Complexities of CD28/B7: CTLA-4 costimulatory pathways in autoimmunity and transplantation. Annual Review of Immunology. 2001;19(1):225–252. [PubMed]
18. Schweitzer AN, Sharpe AH. Studies using antigen-presenting cells lacking expression of both B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) show distinct requirements for B7 molecules during priming versus restimulation of Th2 but not Th1 cytokine production. Journal of Immunology. 1998;161(6):2762–2771. [PubMed]
19. Terrazas LI, Montero D, Terrazas CA, Reyes JL, Rodríguez-Sosa M. Role of the programmed Death-1 pathway in the suppressive activity of alternatively activated macrophages in experimental cysticercosis. International Journal for Parasitology. 2005;35(13):1349–1358. [PubMed]
20. Jenkins SJ, Allen JE. Similarity and diversity in macrophage activation by nematodes, trematodes, and cestodes. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology. 2010;2010:14 pages.262609 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012;122(3):787–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Subramanian M, Shaha C. Up-regulation of Bcl-2 through ERK phosphorylation is associated with human macrophage survival in an estrogen microenvironment. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(4):2330–2338. [PubMed]
23. Routley CE, Ashcroft GS. Effect of estrogen and progesterone on macrophage activation during wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2009;17(1):42–50. [PubMed]
24. Muñoz-Cruz S, Togno-Pierce C, Morales-Montor J. Non-reproductive effects of sex steroids: their immunoregulatory role. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;11(13):1714–1727. [PubMed]
25. Ahmadi K, McCruden AB. Macrophage may responses to androgen via its receptor. Medical Science Monitor. 2006;12(1):BR15–BR20. [PubMed]
26. Ashcroft GS, Mills SJ. Androgen receptor-mediated inhibition of cutaneous wound healing. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;110(5):615–624. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Khan KN, Masuzaki H, Fujishita A, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression im macrophages and regulation of hepatocyte growth factor by ovarian steroids in women with endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(7):2004–2013. [PubMed]
28. Wang Y, Wang L, Zhao J, Qiao Z. Estrogen, but not testosterone, down-regulates cytokine production in nicotine-induced murine macrophage. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2005;27(5):311–316. [PubMed]
29. Larralde C, Morales J, Terrazas I, Govezensky T, Romano MC. Sex hormone changes induced by the parasite lead to feminization of the male host in murine Taenia crassiceps cysticercosis. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1995;52(6):575–580. [PubMed]
30. Sciutto E, Fragoso G, Diaz ML, et al. Murine Taenia crassiceps cysticercosis: H-2 complex and sex influence on susceptibility. Parasitology Research. 1991;77(3):243–246. [PubMed]
31. Bojalil R, Terrazas LI, Govezensky T, Sciutto E, Larralde C. Thymus-related cellular immune mechanisms in sex-associated resistance to experimental murine cysticercosis (Taenia crassiceps) Journal of Parasitology. 1993;79(3):384–389. [PubMed]
32. Allen JE, Loke P. Divergent roles for macrophages in lymphatic filariasis. Parasite Immunology. 2001;23(7):345–352. [PubMed]
33. Goodridge HS, Wilson EH, Harnett W, Campbell CC, Harnett MM, Liew FY. Modulation of macrophage cytokine production by ES-62, a secreted product of the filarial nematode Acanthocheilonema viteae . Journal of Immunology. 2001;167(2):940–945. [PubMed]
34. Rodríguez-Sosa M, Satoskar AR, David JR, Terrazas LI. Altered T helper responses in CD40 and interleukin-12 deficient mice reveal a critical role for Th1 responses in eliminating the helminth parasite Taenia crassiceps . International Journal for Parasitology. 2003;33(7):703–711. [PubMed]
35. Rodríguez-Sosa M, Satoskar AR, Calderón R, et al. Chronic helminth infection induces alternatively activated macrophages expressing high levels of CCR5 with low interleukin-12 production and Th2-biasing ability. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70(7):3656–3664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Gilliver SC, Ashworth JJ, Mills SJ, Hardman MJ, Ashcroft GS. Androgens modulate the inflammatory response during acute wound healing. Journal of Cell Science. 2006;119(4):722–732. [PubMed]
37. Chao TC, Chao HH, Chen MF, Greager JA, Walter RJ. Female sex hormones modulate the function of LPS-treated macrophages. The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2000;44(5):310–318. [PubMed]
38. Huang H, He J, Yuan Y, et al. Opposing effects of estradiol and progesterone on the oxidative stress-induced production of chemokine and proinflammatory cytokines in murine peritoneal macrophages. Journal of Medical Investigation. 2008;55(1-2):133–141. [PubMed]
39. Gay-Andrieu F, Cozon GJN, Ferrandiz J, Peyron F. Progesterone fails to modulate Toxoplasma gondii replication in the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line. Parasite Immunology. 2002;24(4):173–178. [PubMed]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Hindawi