PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Biochem Mol Toxicol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3578057
NIHMSID: NIHMS439058

Fetal Liver Bisphenol A Concentrations and Biotransformation Gene Expression Reveal Variable Exposure and Altered Capacity for Metabolism in Humans

Abstract

Widespread exposure to the endocrine active compound, bisphenol A (BPA), is well documented in humans. A growing body of literature suggests adverse health outcomes associated with varying ranges of exposure to BPA. In the current study, we measured the internal dose of free BPA and conjugated BPA and evaluated gene expression of bio-transformation enzymes specific for BPA metabolism in 50 first- and second-trimester human fetal liver samples. Both free BPA and conjugated BPA concentrations varied widely, with free BPA exhibiting three times higher concentrations than conjugated BPA concentrations. As compared to gender-matched adult liver controls, UDP-glucuronyltransferase, sulfotransferase, and steroid sulfatase genes exhibited reduced expression whereas β-glucuronidase mRNA expression remained unchanged in the fetal tissues. This study provides evidence that there is considerable exposure to BPA during human pregnancy and that the capacity for BPA metabolism is altered in the human fetal liver.

Keywords: Bisphenol A, Biotransformation, Liver, Biomonitoring

INTRODUCTION

Bisphenol A (BPA) is incorporated into polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resin for use in a variety of products for its desirable commercial properties involving transparency, malleability, and high impact strength [1]. BPA is commonly found in products such as dental sealants, water bottles, canned food items, and thermal receipt papers [25]. The leaching of BPA from consumer products presents many opportunities for human exposure via inhalation, ingestion, and dermal routes. Hence, human exposure to BPA is widespread, and several studies have reported detectable levels of total urinary BPA in a majority of individuals in populations around the world, including the United States, China, and Korea [6, 7]. While most human biomonitoring studies report total BPA levels in urine, free BPA and BPA metabolite measurements in tissue are necessary to assess the relationships between internal dose and adverse health outcomes.

Animal studies suggest that BPA exposures, even at low doses well below the established U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reference dose of 50 μg/kg BW/day, are associated with breast and prostate cancer and reproductive and behavioral abnormalities [8, 9]. Among the limited studies focusing on BPA exposure on human health, increased BPA levels were correlated with cardiovascular disease, decreased semen quality, altered childhood behavior, and recurrent miscarriages [1013]. BPA can mimic or antagonize endogenous hormones, and subsequently perturb endocrine function, by binding weakly to several steroid receptors including the estrogen receptors (ER α and β) and thyroid hormone receptor [1416]. BPA has a strong binding affinity for the transmembrane ER, G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), and the orphan nuclear receptor, estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRγ) [17,18]. BPA can also activate transcription factors, such as peroxisome × receptor (PXR) and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which are often involved in cross-talk with steroid receptors [19, 20]. Many of these receptors play an important role in gene regulation, suggesting that BPA may influence normal differentiation and maturation processes especially during embryonic and fetal development.

While the debate on human BPA exposure–disease relationships continues, the National Toxicology Program declared in 2008 that there is concern for BPA toxicity in sensitive populations such as pregnant women and children. In adults, human pharmacokinetic data suggest rapid metabolism of estrogenic free BPA into the nonestrogenic BPA glucuronide and BPA sulfate metabolites, via UDP-glucuronyltransferase (UGT2B15) and sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) enzymes, followed by urinary elimination [21,22]. In human and rodent fetuses and neonates, however, there is generally reduced or altered capacity for chemical detoxification [23, 24], and thus, metabolism may not ensure negligible risk in these vulnerable populations. Furthermore, β-glucuronidase (GUSB) and steroid sulfatase (STS), enzymes that catalyze the breakdown of inactive BPA metabolites to free BPA, have been detected in mammalian placenta [25, 26], and a number of studies report detectable levels of active BPA in the human placenta and amniotic fluid [2729], indicating the potential for dysregulation of important biological processes necessary for fetal development and disease progression later in life.

In this study, first- and second-trimester human liver specimens were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) for endogenous BPA concentrations to assess in utero exposure. To assess the ability of the fetus to detoxify BPA, tissue-specific BPA concentrations were compared to expression of biotransformation enzyme isoforms specific to BPA metabolism. Furthermore, we compared BPA dose and mRNA expression between fetal and adult liver specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue Samples

Human fetal liver samples, ranging from gestational day 74–120, were obtained from the NIH-funded University of Washington Birth Defects Laboratory fetal tissue bank (2R24 HD000836-47). These healthy tissue specimens were collected from volunteers undergoing elective pregnancy termination during the first or second trimester of pregnancy. After surgery and proper consent for donation, organs were flash-frozen and subsequently stored in polycarbonate-free polypropylene tubing at −80°C, prior to shipment to the University of Michigan (UM) on dry ice. From the date of receipt at UM to BPA processing, only one sample was stored at −80°C for 2 years (>75% stored for <1 year). BPA in urine samples has previously been assessed for degradation in −80°C storage [30] and thus is not expected to be a considerable limitation in our study. No significant correlation was observed between time in −80°C storage and free BPA levels (R2 < 0.03).

Other than gestational age, and occasionally sex and race, no identifying information about the clinical samples was provided. Samples with missing sex information (N = 10) were assayed for the Y-chromosome specific SRY and the X-chromosome specific ATL1 genes using a nested PCR analysis as described previously, with slight modifications [31]. As controls, healthy frozen adult liver samples were procured from Asterand (Detroit, MI). These normal adult liver specimens, belonging to one male and one female 50-year-old Caucasian subjects, were recovered from routine autopsies, stored in polycarbonate-free polypropylene tubing, and immediately frozen for storage. The liver specimens did not exhibit any pathological characteristics.

BPA Analysis and Quality Control

Frozen liver samples were processed for quantification of free BPA and conjugated BPA metabolites. An average of 630 mg (between 400 and 970 mg) of excised frozen tissue was pulverized into fine powder using a stainless steel mortar and ceramic pestle above liquid nitrogen and stored in a 2-mL polypropylene eppendorf tube. The homogenized tissue was shipped to the Wadsworth Center (New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY) overnight on dry ice, where samples were processed. Homogenized liver samples were spiked with 5 ng of the internal standard, 13C12-BPA, and further homogenized in 5 mL of acetonitrile. The method for the analysis of free BPA and conjugated BPA has been previously described [32]. Briefly, tissue samples were extracted several times with acetonitrile and reconstituted with 10% dichloromethane in hexane. Sample extract was then loaded onto a Strata NH2 cartridge (200 mg/3 cc; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) preconditioned with 5 mL of 80% methanol in acetone and 5 mL of hexane. The cartridge was washed with 5 mL of hexane and eluted with 5 mL of 80% methanol in acetone. The eluate was concentrated to 0.5 mL under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The resulting extract represents free BPA, whereas the residual pellet was further processed for conjugated BPA quantification. The pellet, after addition of 5 ng of the internal standard and 1 mL of water, was digested in 1 mL of 1 M ammonium acetate buffer containing 2 μL/mL β-glucuronidase (with 0.6% sulfatase activity; from Helix pomatia, 145,700 unit/mL; Sigma, St Louis, MO) at 37°C for 12 h. This conjugated BPA fraction was extracted thrice with ethyl acetate. The sample extract was concentrated to near dryness, reconstituted with 10% dichloromethane in hexane, and purified by passing through the Strata NH2 cartridge as described above. The final eluate was concentrated to 0.5 mL.

BPA and 13C12-BPA detection from both extracts was quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with API 2000 electrospray triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (ESI-MS/MS; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and modified from a protocol published previously [33]. Ten microliters of each extract was injected onto an analytical column, set at 25°C and a flow rate of 300 μL/min with the mobile phase comprising of varying methanol and water mixtures (25–99% methanol gradient). Instrument parameters were as follows: MS/MS was set to electrospray negative mode, cone voltage set at −30 V, collision energy set at −25 V, capillary voltage set at −4.5 KV, and desolvation temperature set at 400°C. For detection, transitions were monitored at 227 > 212 for BPA and 239 > 224 for 13C12-BPA using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM).

Several quality assurance and quality control measurements were taken to assure the validity of the analytical technique. Selected sample matrices were spiked with BPA standards and then passed through the entire analytical procedure. Results indicated an average recovery of 104% (90–120%) for spiked BPA and 85% (65–120%) for spiked 13C12-BPA. An external calibration curve was prepared by injecting standards at varying concentrations (10 μL of 0.05–100 ng/mL), resulting in a calibration coefficient >0.99. In addition, a procedural blank (water) was analyzed between every 10 samples that were analyzed. To prevent contamination, only polypropylene or BPA-free supplies were used during sample processing. Furthermore, BPA-free water was stored at −80°C and then pulverized over the frozen mortar and pestle apparatus, similar to the process described above, to assess contamination introduced during homogenization. Free BPA and conjugated BPA concentrations were both below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.1 ng/g in controls and blanks. For data analysis, liver BPA concentrations below the LOQ were assigned a value of 0.071 ng/g, which was estimated by dividing the LOQ by the square root of 2.

RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA, in addition to genomic DNA and total protein, was purified from frozen liver tissue using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Before extraction, 10–20 mg of tissue was added to a 2-mL round bottom microcentrifuge tube containing 600 μL of Buffer RLT with 1% β-mercaptoethanol and a 5-mm stainless steel bead, and subsequently homogenized twice for 2 min at 20 Hz in the TissueLyser II (Qiagen). RNA quality and quantity was assessed using the Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).

To generate complementary DNA for each sample, approximately 1 μg of total RNA template was used with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The thermocycler settings for cDNA synthesis required incubation at 25°C for 5 min, 42°C for 60 min, and 90°C for 5 min.

Primer Design and Real-time Quantitative PCR

Primer pairs for real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) were designed for four genes related to BPA metabolism using GenScript Real-Time PCR (TaqMan) Primer Design Tool (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ). The final UGT2B15 primer sequence was obtained from the Harvard Primer Bank. The primers for human liver reference genes, GAPDH, UBC, and B2M were similarly designed using GenScript. All RT-qPCR primers (Table 1) were verified using Primer BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome) and chosen avoiding sequence alignment over polymorphisms or multiple binding sites. Most primers span introns or bridge exon–exon junctions, resulting in unique amplicons 50–200 base pairs long. All primer sets were tested for PCR efficiency using 10-fold serial dilutions of a standard template. Primers with the best standard curve slope and R2 values (>0.97) were chosen as the final RT-qPCR assay.

TABLE 1
RT-qPCR Primers for BPA Biotransformation Analysis

Template amplification was set up in a 25-μL reaction for RT-qPCR using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Each reaction, containing 2 μL of 10-fold diluted cDNA template and 100 nM primer concentration, was carried out in triplicate on a C100 Thermal Cycler with a CFX96 Real-Time head (Bio-Rad). Each 96-well plate contained no template controls for individual primer sets as well as plate control samples to adjust for interplate variability. RT-qPCR cycle parameters were set to 95°C for 3 min, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 55°C for 30 s, followed by 95°C for 10 s and 65°C for 5 s.

The average threshold cycle (C(t)) from triplicate runs was calculated for individual genes using the CFX Manager Version 1.6 software (Bio-Rad). An interrun calibration using the plate controls automatically adjusted data points between plates. For normalized expression, the software takes the C(t) for each gene and then normalizes the values to the average C(t) of the endogenous reference genes, GAPDH, UBC, and B2M. Results are reported as normalized fold expression change (2−ΔΔC(t)) with standard error of the mean. The final normalized fold change reported represents fetal expression relative to expression in a gender matched adult control, where fold change equals one.

Statistical Analysis

Distribution of BPA in liver tissue was examined and did not appear to be normal. Free BPA, conjugated BPA, and total BPA (ng/g wet weight) concentrations were presented as percentiles, geometric means, and variances. Bivariate nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon rank sum and Spearman correlation) were used to analyze free BPA and conjugated BPA concentrations with covariates such as sex and gestational age. Similar bivariate analyses were conducted separately with the primary predictors: mRNA expression of UGT2B15, GUSB, SULT1A1, and STS. Simple and multiple linear regression models, in which BPA concentration outcomes were log transformed, were tested to assess the relationship between BPA tissue concentrations and gene expression. Each of the four genes was individually analyzed with free BPA in a simple linear regression model. Regression models were not analyzed for conjugated BPA given that the exact BPA glucuronide and BPA sulfate metabolite composition was unknown. In the multiple linear regression models, gene expression and free BPA were analyzed after adjusting for gestational age, as a confounder, and sex, as an effect modifier. Regression coefficients (β) were analyzed and calculated as percentage change [100(êβ − 1)] with p values <0.05 considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using the stats and epicalc packages in R (version 2.14.2; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2012).

RESULTS

In the adult liver controls, the concentrations of conjugated BPA were both <LOQ, whereas the concentrations of free BPA were <LOQ and 0.38 ng/g wet weight (Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting Information). Greater than 70% of the 50 fetal liver samples, however, contained detectable levels of free BPA and conjugated BPA, ranging from <LOQ to 50.5 ng/g (geometric mean: 2.26 ng/g) and <LOQ to 49.5 ng/g (geometric mean: 0.65 ng/g), respectively (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting Information). The majority (78%) of samples exhibited a free BPA to conjugated BPA ratio greater than 1, with a mean of 6.91 and median of 3.75, across all gestational age and sex (Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting Information). No significant differences in free BPA (p value: 0.675) or conjugated BPA (p value: 0.976) concentrations appeared between male and female specimens. After assessing BPA concentrations over developmental time span (Figure 1), gestational age was found to be significantly correlated with free BPA (R2 = 0.316; p value: 0.025) but only marginally significant with conjugated BPA (R2 = 0.267; p value: 0.059) across all samples.

FIGURE 1
Liver tissue free BPA levels are associated with gestational age but not sex. (A) A significant positive correlation between free BPA levels and gestational age is observed (overall R2: 0.316 and p value: 0.025). When the exposure-age correlation was ...
TABLE 2
Distribution of Free, Conjugated, and Total BPA (ng/g) in Human Fetal Liver Tissues (Gestational Age: day 74–120, N = 50)

In general, mRNA expression of UGT2B15 and SULT1A1 was significantly reduced (p values: 0.039 and 0.044, respectively), whereas STS expression was marginally reduced (p value: 0.054) in fetal liver compared to adult liver samples. Furthermore, normalized mRNA expression was significantly higher in male compared to female fetal livers, especially for UGT2B15, SULT1A1, and STS expression (p value: <0.005 for all three genes; Figure 2). GUSB displayed no significant difference in expression between fetal and adult liver samples (p value: 0.197). There were no significant correlations between expression of the four BPA biotransformation genes and gestational age (p value: >0.200 for all associations).

FIGURE 2
Biotransformation gene expression levels are associated with sex. Boxplots represent sex stratified biotransformation enzyme expression in fetal livers compared to adult livers, normalized to onefold change for each gene. (A) Fetal liver expression of ...

The association between fetal liver free BPA concentrations and expression of candidate genes related to BPA metabolism was assessed using linear regression. No significant associations were observed between free BPA concentration and expression levels in simple regression modeling (UGT2B15 p value: 0.441, SULT1A1 p value: 0.914, GUSB p value: 0.477, and STS p value: 0.753). The correlation between free BPA and many of the gene expression profiles, however, differed between male and female liver specimens, suggesting that sex may act as a potential effect modifier. Therefore, in the final model, an interaction term between sex and expression was added along with adjustment for gestational age. There were no significant relationships between free BPA tissue concentration and individual biotransformation gene expression values adjusting for gestational age, sex, and their interaction (p value: >0.500 for all associations).

DISCUSSION

Studies reporting internal dose of BPA in human tissues at vulnerable developmental stages are presently lacking. When we measured endogenous BPA concentrations in human fetal liver, detectable levels of free and conjugated species were found, ranging from <LOQ to 50 ng/g wet weight (parts per billion). Comparable concentrations of free BPA have been previously reported in 49 term placentas collected from Spanish women (<LOQ- 22.2 ng/g), 248 amniotic fluids from second-trimester Japanese women (<LOQ-5.62 ng/mL), and 28 fetal livers from a Canadian population (<LOQ- 37.7 ng/g) [27,28,34]. Often, these studies only quantify free BPA or total BPA, and the LOQs are higher than 0.1 ng/g.

A higher free BPA to conjugated BPA ratio in this sample population is especially notable, given that free BPA normally represents 10–30% of total BPA in adult urinary excretions [35, 36]. The discrepancy in our clinical samples may be attributed to varying metabolic potential across tissues and time points, or as a result of contamination during sample processing. Several experimental precautions were taken, including use of polycarbonate-free equipment and negative controls throughout processing. Any exogenous BPA introduced during tissue procurement likely affected all samples; however, the wide range of free BPA and <LOQ levels observed implies otherwise. Furthermore, a recent study examining BPA in second- and third-trimester amniotic fluid from American women found that free BPA accounted for more than 80% of total BPA levels [37].

The biotransformation system undergoes significant changes during hepatic maturation, resulting in differential response to xenobiotic chemicals. Hepatic mRNA and protein expression of 13 UGT genes, including UGT2B15, were not detectable in the fetus and were reduced in children compared to adults [38]. In our larger collection of samples, we also found significantly reduced mRNA expression of UGT2B15 in fetal liver. While fetal GUSB did not show differential expression, STS exhibited significantly reduced expression compared to adult livers, as supported by other studies [3941]. Hepatic SULT genes, especially SULT1A1, often exhibit protein expression levels that are equivalent to adult levels [42, 43]. Although we observed reduced mRNA expression of SULT1A1 in fetal liver, there was wide variability in our samples. Future studies can be improved by increasing the number of adult liver controls to account for intersubject variability resulting from not only differential exposure but also genetic variation contributing to altered xenobiotic metabolism. Furthermore, integration of gene ontogeny with genetic variants involved in differential BPA metabolism, such as the UGT2B15 D85Y substitution [44], among others, will be necessary for complete understanding of altered BPA metabolism in human fetal samples.

When the relationship between biotransformation gene expression and free BPA concentration was examined, no significant correlations were observed. In addition to small sample size, several reasons may help explain the lack of association, even after adjustment for gestational age and gender. First, the mRNA levels quantified in these first- and second-trimester liver samples may not be a good proxy for measuring functional activity of biotransformation enzymes at this particular window of development. Thus, experiments that assess protein activity of BPA biotransformation enzymes in fresh human tissue will be valuable. Second, there is also the possibility that, despite experimental precautions described above, free BPA was introduced exogenously during sample procurement and this contamination may have negated any true associations between expression and exposure. Therefore, the optimal regression model should evaluate biotransformation gene expression with their respective BPA species. Future analyses will require separate characterization of both BPA glucuronide and BPA sulfate in tissue. Finally, the high free BPA to conjugated BPA ratio observed may also be a result of deconjugation in the placenta or differential exposure from physiological changes occurring in the mother during pregnancy [40, 45]. To assess BPA fate throughout human pregnancy, investigation of BPA metabolism and transport in the placenta, maternal liver, and fetal liver is required.

As is true in many human studies, bioethical issues and the paucity of appropriate samples limit our ability to fully comprehend the role of BPA biotransformation during this sensitive window of development. This study is one of the first of its kind to investigate both BPA conjugating and deconjugating enzyme gene expression in relation to endogenous BPA exposure in the developing human fetus. Characterizing biotransformation gene ontogeny with BPA exposure from early gestation to birth will enhance our understanding of BPA fate and subsequent health effects.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table

Acknowledgments

Contract Grant Sponsor: NIH.

Contract Grant Number: ES017524.

Contract Grant Sponsor: University of Michigan National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Core Center.

Contract Grant Number: P30 ES017885.

MSN was supported by Institutional Training Grant T32 ES007062. The authors would like to thank the University of Washington Birth Defects Research Laboratory (2R24 HD000836-47) for tissue sample procurement and the University of Michigan Rackham Graduate School for assay funding.

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

The supporting information is available from the corresponding author (ude.hcimu@yonilodd) on request.

References

1. Ben-Jonathan N, Steinmetz R. Xenoestrogens: the emerging story of bisphenol A. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1998;9(3):124–128. [PubMed]
2. Fleisch AF, Sheffield PE, Chinn C, Edelstein BL, Landrigan PJ. Bisphenol A and related compounds in dental materials. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):760–768. [PubMed]
3. Kubwabo C, Kosarac I, Stewart B, Gauthier BR, Lalonde K, Lalonde PJ. Migration of bisphenol A from plastic baby bottles, baby bottle liners and reusable polycarbonate drinking bottles. Food Addit Contam, Part A: Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2009;26(6):928–937. [PubMed]
4. Goodson A, Summerfield W, Cooper I. Survey of bisphenol A and bisphenol F in canned foods. Food Addit Contam. 2002;19(8):796–802. [PubMed]
5. Liao C, Kannan K. Widespread occurrence of bisphenol A in paper and paper products: implications for human exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(21):9372–9379. [PubMed]
6. Calafat A, Ye X, Wong L, Reidy J, Needham L. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(1):39–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Zhang Z, Alomirah H, Cho HS, Li YF, Liao C, Minh TB, Mohd MA, Nakata H, Ren N, Kannan K. Urinary bisphenol A concentrations and their implications for human exposure in several Asian countries. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(16):7044–7050. [PubMed]
8. Maffini MV, Rubin BS, Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Endocrine disruptors and reproductive health: the case of bisphenol-A. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;254–255:179–186. [PubMed]
9. Vandenberg LN, Colborn T, Hayes TB, Heindel JJ, Jacobs DR, Jr, Lee DH, Shioda T, Soto AM, Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, et al. Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(3):378–455. [PubMed]
10. Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, Henley WE, Depledge M, Wallace RB, Melzer D. Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1303–1310. [PubMed]
11. Meeker JD, Ehrlich S, Toth TL, Wright DL, Calafat AM, Trisini AT, Ye X, Hauser R. Semen quality and sperm DNA damage in relation to urinary bisphenol A among men from an infertility clinic. Reprod Toxicol. 2010;30(4):532–539. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sonta S, Makino T, Suzumori K. Exposure to bisphenol A is associated with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(8):2325–2329. [PubMed]
13. Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Ye X, Dietrich KN, Lanphear BP. Impact of early-life bisphenol a exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):873–882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Gould JC, Leonard LS, Maness SC, Wagner BL, Conner K, Zacharewski T, Safe S, McDonnell DP, Gaido KW. Bisphenol A interacts with the estrogen receptor alpha in a distinct manner from estradiol. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998;142(1–2):203–214. [PubMed]
15. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, van der Saag PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson JA. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology. 1998;139(10):4252–4263. [PubMed]
16. Moriyama K, Tagami T, Akamizu T, Usui T, Saijo M, Kanamoto N, Hataya Y, Shimatsu A, Kuzuya H, Nakao K. Thyroid hormone action is disrupted by bisphenol A as an antagonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):5185–5190. [PubMed]
17. Thomas P, Dong J. Binding and activation of the seven-transmembrane estrogen receptor GPR30 by environmental estrogens: a potential novel mechanism of endocrine disruption. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;102(1–5):175–179. [PubMed]
18. Takayanagi S, Tokunaga T, Liu X, Okada H, Matsushima A, Shimohigashi Y. Endocrine disruptor bisphenol A strongly binds to human estrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRgamma) with high constitutive activity. Toxicol Lett. 2006;167(2):95–105. [PubMed]
19. Sui Y, Ai N, Park SH, Rios-Pilier J, Perkins JT, Welsh WJ, Zhou C. Bisphenol A and its analogues activate human pregnane X receptor. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(3):399–405. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Kruger T, Long M, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC. Plastic components affect the activation of the aryl hydrocarbon and the androgen receptor. Toxicology. 2008;246(2–3):112–123. [PubMed]
21. Hanioka N, Naito T, Narimatsu S. Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms involved in bisphenol A glucuronidation. Chemosphere. 2008;74(1):33–36. [PubMed]
22. Nishiyama T, Ogura K, Nakano H, Kaku T, Takahashi E, Ohkubo Y, Sekine K, Hiratsuka A, Kadota S, Watabe T. Sulfation of environmental estrogens by cytosolic human sulfotransferases. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2002;17(3):221–228. [PubMed]
23. Hines RN, McCarver DG. The ontogeny of human drug-metabolizing enzymes: phase I oxidative enzymes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300(2):355–360. [PubMed]
24. McCarver DG, Hines RN. The ontogeny of human drug-metabolizing enzymes: phase II conjugation enzymes and regulatory mechanisms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300(2):361–366. [PubMed]
25. Sperker B, Backman JT, Kroemer HK. The role of beta-glucuronidase in drug disposition and drug targeting in humans. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33(1):18–31. [PubMed]
26. Kriz L, Bicikova M, Hampl R. Roles of steroid sulfatase in brain and other tissues. Physiol Res. 2008;57(5):657–668. [PubMed]
27. Jimenez-Diaz I, Zafra-Gomez A, Ballesteros O, Navea N, Navalon A, Fernandez MF, Olea N, Vilchez JL. Determination of Bisphenol A and its chlorinated derivatives in placental tissue samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B: Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010;878(32):3363–3369. [PubMed]
28. Cao XL, Zhang J, Goodyer CG, Hayward S, Cooke GM, Curran IH. Bisphenol A in human placental and fetal liver tissues collected from Greater Montreal area (Quebec) during 1998–2008. Chemosphere. 2012;89(5):505–511. [PubMed]
29. Ikezuki Y, Tsutsumi O, Takai Y, Kamei Y, Taketani Y. Determination of bisphenol A concentrations in human biological fluids reveals significant early prenatal exposure. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2839–2841. [PubMed]
30. Calafat AM, Kuklenyik Z, Reidy JA, Caudill SP, Ekong J, Needham LL. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(4):391–395. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Tungwiwat W, Fucharoen G, Ratanasiri T, Sanchaisuriya K, Fucharoen S. Non-invasive fetal sex determination using a conventional nested PCR analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;334(1–2):173–177. [PubMed]
32. Anderson OS, Nahar MS, Faulk C, Jones TR, Liao C, Kannan K, Weinhouse C, Rozek LS, Dolinoy DC. Epigenetic responses following maternal dietary exposure to physiologically relevant levels of bisphenol A. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012;53(3):334–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Padmanabhan V, Siefert K, Ransom S, Johnson T, Pinkerton J, Anderson L, Tao L, Kannan K. Maternal bisphenol-A levels at delivery: a looming problem? J Perinatol. 2008;28(4):258–263. [PubMed]
34. Yamada H, Furuta I, Kato EH, Kataoka S, Usuki Y, Kobashi G, Sata F, Kishi R, Fujimoto S. Maternal serum and amniotic fluid bisphenol A concentrations in the early second trimester. Reprod Toxicol. 2002;16(6):735–739. [PubMed]
35. Koch HM, Kolossa-Gehring M, Schroter-Kermani C, Angerer J, Bruning T. Bisphenol A in 24 h urine and plasma samples of the German Environmental Specimen Bank from 1995 to 2009: A retrospective exposure evaluation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012;22(6):610–616. [PubMed]
36. Liao C, Kannan K. Determination of free and conjugated forms of bisphenol a in human urine and serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(9):5003–5009. [PubMed]
37. Edlow AG, Chen M, Smith NA, Lu C, McElrath TF. Fetal bisphenol A exposure: concentration of conjugated and unconjugated bisphenol A in amniotic fluid in the second and third trimesters. Reprod Toxicol. 2012;34(1):1–7. [PubMed]
38. Strassburg CP, Strassburg A, Kneip S, Barut A, Tukey RH, Rodeck B, Manns MP. Developmental aspects of human hepatic drug glucuronidation in young children and adults. Gut. 2002;50(2):259–265. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Miki Y, Nakata T, Suzuki T, Darnel AD, Moriya T, Kaneko C, Hidaka K, Shiotsu Y, Kusaka H, Sasano H. Systemic distribution of steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human adult and fetal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(12):5760–5768. [PubMed]
40. Lucier GW, Sonawane BR, McDaniel OS. Glucuronidation and deglucuronidation reactions in hepatic and extrahepatic tissues during perinatal development. Drug Metab Dispos. 1977;5(3):279–287. [PubMed]
41. Collier AC, Tingle MD, Paxton JW, Mitchell MD, Keelan JA. Metabolizing enzyme localization and activities in the first trimester human placenta: the effect of maternal and gestational age, smoking and alcohol consumption. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2564–2572. [PubMed]
42. Stanley EL, Hume R, Coughtrie MW. Expression profiling of human fetal cytosolic sulfotransferases involved in steroid and thyroid hormone metabolism and in detoxification. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;240(1–2):32–42. [PubMed]
43. Duanmu Z, Weckle A, Koukouritaki SB, Hines RN, Falany JL, Falany CN, Kocarek TA, Runge-Morris M. Developmental expression of aryl, estrogen, and hydroxysteroid sulfotransferases in pre- and postnatal human liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;316(3):1310–1317. [PubMed]
44. Hanioka N, Oka H, Nagaoka K, Ikushiro S, Narimatsu S. Effect of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 polymorphism on bisphenol A glucuronidation. Arch Toxicol. 2011;85(11):1373–1381. [PubMed]
45. Abduljalil K, Furness P, Johnson TN, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Soltani H. Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(6):365–396. [PubMed]