PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Immunity. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 24, 2013.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3576928
NIHMSID: NIHMS441576
Perivascular mast cells dynamically probe cutaneous blood vessels to capture IgE
Laurence E. Cheng,1 Karin Hartmann,2 Axel Roers,3 Matthew F. Krummel,4 and Richard M. Locksley5,6,7
1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
2Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
3Institute for Immunology, University of Technology Dresden, Medical Faculty Carl-Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany
4Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
5Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
6Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
7Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143
Corresponding author: Richard M. Locksley, 513 Parnassus Ave, Box 0795, San Francisco, CA 94143, locksley/at/medicine.ucsf.edu, Tel: (415) 476-5859, Fax: (415) 502-5081
Mast cells are tissue-resident, immune cells that play a central role in allergic disease. These contributions are largely dependent on the acquisition of antigen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). Despite this requirement, studies of mast cell and IgE interactions have overlooked the mechanism by which mast cells acquire IgE from the blood. To address this gap, we developed reporter IgE molecules and employed imaging techniques to study mast cell function in situ. Our data demonstrate that skin mast cells exhibit selective uptake of IgE based on perivascular positioning. Furthermore, perivascular mast cells acquire IgE by extending cell processes across the vessel wall to capture luminal IgE. These data demonstrate how tissue mast cells acquire IgE and reveal a strategy by which extra-vascular cells monitor blood contents to capture molecules central to cellular function.
Mast cells are hematopoietic, tissue-resident cells that have been considered to play diverse roles in host defense and immune regulation as well as a central role in allergic disease (Galli and Tsai, 2010; Gould and Sutton, 2008; Locksley, 2010). Despite these many potential roles, recent studies, using mouse strains with targeted mast cell deletion, have primarily served to underscore the mast cell contribution to the clinical manifestations of allergic disease (Dudeck et al., 2011; Feyerabend et al., 2011).
The mast cell contribution to allergy is largely dependent on the acquisition of monomeric IgE on the surface of mast cells through expression of the high affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) (Kraft and Kinet, 2007). Though FcεRI can be detected on the surface of mast cell precursors (Hallgren and Gurish, 2007), expression of FcεRI on tissue-resident mast cells increases proportionally with serum IgE levels, suggesting the tissue as a primary site of IgE acquisition (Kraft and Kinet, 2007; Yamaguchi et al., 1997). Once mast cells are loaded with IgE, subsequent antigen binding leads to cross-linking of FcεRI molecules and the immediate release of pre-formed mediators, such as histamine, as well as synthesis of lipid and protein mediators (Galli and Tsai, 2010).
Studies of the mast cell-IgE axis have focused on the regulation of IgE production as well as the clinical manifestations of hypersensitivity responses following antigen exposure. Few studies have examined how mast cells acquire unbound IgE. Defining the mechanism by which mast cells capture IgE will fill a gap in our understanding of the mast cell-IgE axis and may provide new therapeutic approaches to severe allergic disorders.
Although cell-bound IgE is found primarily in tissues, IgE production by plasma cells occurs mostly in the bone marrow, spleen, and lymph nodes (Luger et al., 2009; McMenamin et al., 1992; Talay et al.; Yang et al.). Thus, the localization of IgE production is anatomically distinct from sites of IgE acquisition and effector function. As the amount of surface bound IgE by tissue mast cells directly reflects the size of the serum IgE pool (Kraft and Kinet, 2007), the vasculature acts as a conduit by which unbound IgE is distributed to tissue mast cells. The vasculature also acts as a potential barrier to IgE uptake and could thereby regulate IgE delivery to tissue sites.
Mast cells show a preference toward perivascular localization within tissue, wherein a majority of mast cells lie in close proximity to the basal side of the vessel wall (Galli and Tsai, 2010). We hypothesized that this preferential localization might position mast cells to acquire IgE by a mechanism that requires cells to surmount the endothelial barrier. Using reporter IgE molecules, in vivo imaging techniques, and mast cell reporter mice, we demonstrate that perivascular mast cells dynamically extend processes into the vascular compartment to selectively acquire IgE from the blood.
Heterogeneous IgE uptake by skin mast cells
Passive diffusion of blood-borne IgE across the vasculature has been considered to be the primary means by which tissue mast cells acquire IgE. However, we hypothesized a more active mechanism of IgE acquisition by mast cells, which would lead to selective uptake of IgE by a subset of mast cells. Supporting this idea, ear skin mast cells from 6-week old 4get BALB/c mice, in which mast cells constitutively express enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) (Fig. S1 and Gessner et al., 2005), showed heterogeneous surface IgE levels with approximately 50% of the mast cells having high levels of IgE (Fig. 1A). In contrast, peritoneal mast cells exhibited uniform surface IgE levels. These differences were not a result of the protease-dependent skin mast cell isolation protocol as protease-treated peritoneal mast cells showed no loss of surface IgE (Fig. S2).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Heterogeneous uptake of IgE from blood by skin mast cells
Mast cell-bound IgE has a half-life of up to 2 weeks and can modulate mast cell expression of FcεRI (Gould and Sutton, 2008; Yamaguchi et al., 1997). Therefore, we examined IgE uptake in IgE-deficient 4getxRag2−/− mice following intravenous (I.V.) infusion of 10 µg of IgE. Despite peak IgE levels more than 50-fold greater than physiologic levels in IgE-replete animals (data not shown), only a select population of ear skin mast cells demonstrated IgE uptake at 1 hour and continued to accumulate IgE throughout the time course (Fig. 1B). In contrast, peritoneal mast cells showed uniform uptake of IgE at one hour and further accumulation of IgE throughout the time course, similar to profiles seen at steady state in wild-type animals. The ear skin mast cells also did not achieve surface IgE levels commensurate with peritoneal mast cells. Although slightly lower than on peritoneal mast cells, FcεRI expression on skin mast cells could not account for this discrepancy (Fig. 1C). Similar results were obtained with a smaller 1 µg infusion but with markedly lower IgE uptake in the ear (Fig. S3). Together, these data suggested that skin blood vessels regulate IgE trafficking into the tissue and that select mast cell populations had greater access to vascular contents. The data predicted that IgE uptake would similarly localize to perivascular mast cells.
Characterization of reporter IgE molecules and localization of IgE uptake
To visualize IgE uptake in tissues, we constructed a reporter IgE molecule consisting of a tandem Red Fluorescent Protein (tdRFP) fused N-terminal to the Cε2-4 domains of the IgE heavy chain (Cheng et al., 2010). The resulting homodimeric surrogate IgE molecule has a similar molecular weight as native IgE (188 kDa versus ~200 kDa for native IgE). After an I.V. infusion, RFP-Fcε was found on the cell surface of FcεRI+ cells, including splenic basophils and peritoneal mast cells (Fig. 2A). Additionally, gating of peritoneal exudate cells and total splenocytes on RFP+ cells revealed that essentially all of these cells were mast cells or basophils, respectively (Fig. 2B). Similar to data with native IgE, only a subset of skin mast cells captured RFP-Fcε after a 10 µg I.V. infusion (Fig. 2C). Together, these data indicated that RFP-Fcε displays similar binding and distribution characteristics to native IgE.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Characterization of RFP-Fcε
To visualize the distribution of mast cell IgE uptake, we infused 10 µg RFP-Fcε I.V. into wild-type or mast cell-deficient Wsh/sh (Sash) mice (Wolters et al., 2005). After 24 hours, we counterstained blood vessels in vivo with I.V. tomato lectin FITC and examined whole mounts of ear tissue using confocal microscopy (Fig. 3A). Wild-type mice showed an abundance of RFP+ cells with most cells lying in a perivascular location. In contrast to wild-type mice, mast cell-deficient mice demonstrated no RFP+ cells in the ear skin, though RFP+ basophils could be demonstrated within the vasculature (Fig. 3A). We next sought to obtain quantitative data to examine whether RFP+ mast cells tended to be closer to blood vessels than the total mast cell pool. When bred to a cre-dependent lineage reporter mouse, such as Rosa-YFP (Srinivas et al., 2001), MCPT5cre reporter mice allow specific visualization of >90% of mast cells within the ear skin (Dudeck et al., 2011; Scholten et al., 2008). After infusion with RFP-Fcε, RFP-Fcε was found on ~50% of mast cells (Fig. 3B), and some RFP-Fcε+ mast cells appeared to direct cellular projections toward the blood vessel though these initial studies lacked the resolution to define these projections (Fig 3C).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Perivascular mast cells preferentially capture RFP-Fcε from blood in situ
While RFP-Fcε+ and RFP-Fcε mast cells were both found to associate with the vasculature, RFP+ mast cells were on average 35% closer to the nearest blood vessel compared to the total mast cell population (Fig. 3D). In addition, nearly half of the RFP+ cells were within 2 µm of the nearest blood vessel, while only one quarter of the total mast cell population was similarly positioned (Fig. 3D). Together, these data indicated that perivascular mast cells preferentially acquire IgE from the blood, and we hypothesized that mast cells might directly sample blood to acquire IgE.
Perivascular mast cells have access to blood contents
We first took a flow cytometric approach to demonstrate that mast cells have direct access to blood contents. Similar to established approaches (Pereira et al., 2009; Zachariah and Cyster, 2010), we infused 4get mice with an anti-c-kit monoclonal antibody (2B8) conjugated to a high molecular weight fluorophore, phycoerythrin (PE). If allowed to circulate for a short period of time, PE-antibody conjugates remain intravascular and binding to target cells requires either direct blood exposure or sampling of intravascular contents. After a 5-minute infusion, we observed that approximately 15–20% of mast cells captured 2B8-PE (Fig. 4A). Capture of 2B8-PE was not IgE-dependent as FcεRI−/− mice showed similar 2B8-PE uptake when compared to wild-type animals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mast cells probe blood to access serum contents
As noted in our prior experiments, peritoneal mast cells display rapid and uniform acquisition of IgE (Fig. 1). To examine whether peritoneal mast cells similarly display direct access to the blood, we assessed 2B8-PE binding in these cells. Consistent a lack of direct access to the blood and in contrast to ear skin mast cells, peritoneal mast cells showed no binding of 2B8-PE after I.V. exposure (Fig. 4B). This was not due to an inherent inability to bind this antibody as intraperitoneal injection of 2B8-PE led to rapid binding to peritoneal mast cells but essentially no binding to skin mast cells (Fig. 4B).
We next sought to characterize the positioning and dynamics of mast cell projections and blood vessels (Fig. 3B). To investigate this, we employed intravital, high-resolution confocal microscopy in MCPT5-cre × Ai6 mice (M5Ai6), which allowed for greater detail in visualization of mast cells and cellular projections in vivo (Madisen et al., 2010). Similar to our static imaging, we found mast cells closely approximated to blood vessels marked with labeled anti-CD31 antibody (Fig. 5A). We observed two distinct probing phenomena. First, some mast cells demonstrated relatively stable projections in the interior of blood vessels (Fig. 5A and Movie S1). As we followed such cells in time, serial images demonstrated the retraction of projections (Fig. 5B and Movie S2). In Figure 5B, the projection retracted approximately 5 µm over 30 minutes. We also noted a second behavior in which mast cells serially interacted with the vessel wall and/or the interior of the lumen with portions of the cell body or a cellular projection (Fig. 5C and Movie S3).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mast cells are tightly associated with blood vessels and can dynamically sample the intravascular lumen
Although our data indicated that mast cell sampling of blood contents is an efficient means for perivascular mast cells to capture free IgE, other mechanisms could also contribute. Loading of monomeric IgE onto mast cells is thought to modulate mast cell function, including the possibility of piecemeal degranulation (Kawakami and Galli, 2002), which could lead to local changes in vasopermeability and increased IgE diffusion. Using cell surface CD107a and diminished side-scatter profile as markers of mast cell activation and degranulation, we examined whether IgE loading on mast cells resulted in changes in either of these parameters (Gekara and Weiss, 2008). To ensure uniform loading of mast cells during the assay, we used peritoneal mast cells as our source of mast cells. Following an IV infusion of IgE, peritoneal mast cells demonstrated baseline levels of CD107a and native SSC profiles, which contrasted with control antigen/IgE-activated mast cells (Fig. 6A). To directly address the importance of secreted mast cell products, such as histamine, on IgE uptake in skin, we used a pharmacologic approach to block H1 and H2 histamine receptors and mast cell degranulation. IgE loading in ear skin mast cells was not affected by these inhibitors (Fig. 6B).
Figure 6
Figure 6
IgE loading does not cause degranulation and is unaffected by pharmacologic inhibition of mast cell function
We next wanted to determine whether mast cell projections directly interact with intravascular IgE. As fluorescence of RFP-Fcε was too insensitive for this application, we developed a technique using streptavidin-coated beads coupled to biotinylated IgE and a fluorescent dye. After an infusion of 109 beads, beads were found in systemic circulation but were cleared within 15 minutes (data not shown). As a control, we used dye-coated beads. After infusion of control beads into mast cell reporter mice, we found a few beads near perivascular mast cells but no interaction with the bead (Fig. 7A and Movie S4). In contrast, mast cells showed interactions with IgE-coated beads in the form of projections extending toward an intravascular bead and engulfing it (Fig. 7B and Movie S5 and S6).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mast cells capture intravascular IgE-coated beads
To further establish the capacity of mast cells to capture intravascular IgE, we determined the number of IgE-coated beads in mouse ear skin 20 minutes after infusion. In mast cell replete mice, we recovered an average of 1337 beads per mg of ear tissue (Fig. 7C). In contrast, mast cell deficient (MCPT5cre × Rosa-DTA) mice exhibited a nearly 70% drop in bead recovery. Together, these data indicate that mast cells interact directly with intravascular contents in a dynamic fashion and selectively remove IgE from blood.
The acquisition of IgE by mast cells is central to mast cell function, and the importance of this interaction has been underscored by two recent studies (Dudeck et al., 2011; Feyerabend et al., 2011). Given the critical role of IgE in mast cell biology, our study sought to examine how tissue mast cells acquire IgE. The studies presented here indicate that IgE acquisition by mast cells is regulated at the level of the vasculature with perivascular mast cells demonstrating selective uptake of IgE from the blood.
Immune surveillance of intravascular components has been previously described in professional antigen presenting cells (APC), including intra-aortic dendritic cells and Kupffer cells, which also reside within the vasculature (Choi et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2010). Our data illustrate that extravascular cells are also capable of probing blood, akin to sampling of intraluminal contents in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts by CD103+ dendritic cells (Chieppa et al., 2006; Lambrecht and Hammad, 2009; Rescigno et al., 2001). Mast cells are not generally considered to be antigen presenting cells, though mast cells may express MHC class II under specific conditions (Kambayashi et al., 2009). Instead, intravascular sampling appears to be a means for mast cells to capture unbound IgE, which in turn could promote mast cell function and survival (Kawakami and Galli, 2002; Kraft and Kinet, 2007).
Tissue mast cells have long been known to project dendrites, although the function of these projections has not been clear. Beyond sampling blood, mast cells may also extend projections for intercellular communication through a network of cytonemes. The significance of these projections has not been examined in vivo (Fifadara et al., 2010).
We speculate that in addition to capturing IgE, mast cells employ this sampling mechanism as part of a sentinel function in host defense. Localization to barrier surfaces, the capacity to induce immediate inflammatory responses, and the ability to recruit additional immune cells, positions mast cells as initial responders to pathogen invasion. Specific IgE further enhances these functions when antigen is present. Although local production of IgE has been described in the airway mucosa (Gould and Sutton, 2008), delivery to the skin and mucosal sites remote from IgE production requires systemic distribution. The surveillance mechanism we describe limits distribution of IgE to subsets of mast cells in close approximation to the vasculature. Thus, the cells most likely to influence vascular permeability after activation also have the greatest access to free IgE. It remains unclear whether this anatomic positioning also defines subsets of mast cells that have functional differences beyond the effects of IgE.
Our studies focus on the steady state means by which mast cells acquire IgE. Local changes in vascular permeability, which could be seen with immediate hypersensitivity reactions, infection, or dermatitis, may further modulate IgE loading. In addition, the disparate mechanisms by which skin and peritoneal mast cells acquire IgE suggest that IgE uptake may be organ-specific. Several factors, including mast cell positioning, local vascular permeability, and the predominant mast cell populations (connective tissue versus mucosal) contained within each organ may all play a role in IgE acquisition.
Our data uncover a regulated means by which mast cells acquire IgE and fill an important gap in our understanding of the steps required in the elicitation of hypersensitivity by mast cells. The molecular mechanism by which mast cells survey blood remains undefined. We hypothesize that a gradient between blood and tissue levels of a particular factor or family of molecules may drive mast cell sampling behavior. Further understanding of the mechanism by which mast cells survey the blood compartment may provide a means to modulate human allergic disease in the future.
Mice
4get BALB/c and IgE-deficient 4getxRag2−/− mice have been described (Cheng et al., 2010; Mohrs et al., 2001). Mast cell-deficient Wsh/Wsh (Sash) mice on a C57BL/6 background were provided by G. Caughey (UCSF). MCPT5 cre mice were bred to either of the following reporter mice: Rosa-YFP, Ai6, or Rosa-DTA (Madisen et al., 2010; Srinivas et al., 2001; Voehringer et al., 2008). Rosa-YFP and Ai6 mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed in Specific Pathogen Free facilities. Experimental mice were 6–10 weeks old. Animal use was governed by and in accordance with approved protocols overseen by the Laboratory Animal Resource Center (LARC) and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at UCSF.
Skin tissue and peritoneal mast cell isolation
Ear tissue from euthanized mice was split into dorsal and ventral halves, and then minced. Tissue was re-suspended in PBS plus 2 U/ml of Liberase CI (Roche) and incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes in an orbital shaker similar to published protocols (Grimbaldeston et al., 2007). Collagenase activity was quenched with PBS supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum (FCS), and the cells analyzed by flow cytometry. Peritoneal mast cells were analyzed from lavage fluid collected after euthanasia. The gating scheme was similar to a previously published study (Gessner et al., 2005).
Construction of RFP-Fcε
RFP-Fcε was constructed and produced in the same manner as previous molecules (Cheng et al., 2010). A primer pair (5’- TTTAGATCTGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGG-3’ and 5’-TGGATCCCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGC-3’) that spanned amino acids 2–476 was used to amplify the tdRFP cDNA (Shaner et al., 2004).
Antibodies and flow cytometry
For mast cell staining, we used the following antibody clones: c-kit (ACK2, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), FcεRI (Mar-1, eBioscience). For basophil staining, we used: CD49b (DX5, eBioscience). For in vivo infusion, the following antibodies and clones were used: mouse IgE C38-2 (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) anti-CD31 APC (390, eBioscience), tomato lectin FITC (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA), anti-c-kit PE (2B8, eBioscience). For flow cytometry, we used an LSRII (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA) for data acquisition and analysis. We performed post-acquisition analysis using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR).
Mast cell blood sampling
One µg of PE-conjugated 2B8 or isotype control rat IgG2b antibody were infused I.V. into the tail veins of mice. Within five minutes, mice were euthanized with immediate processing of tissue for flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test.
Confocal microscopy
For confocal microscopy, ear tissue from euthanized mice was split into dorsal and ventral halves (except for experiments involving bead infusions for which the ears remained intact). The tissue was then bathed in Vectashield (Vector Labs) and analyzed with a Nikon C1si laser scanning confocal microscope. Images were analyzed and rendered using Imaris software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). To analyze the distance from mast cells to blood vessels, we used Imaris software to mark the boundaries of the blood vessels and to generate “spots” to represent index populations. The software then calculated the distance from the center of each of these spots to the edge of the nearest blood vessel. A students t-test was performed for significance on the resulting data sets.
Intravital microscopy
Mice received intraperitoneal injections of ketamine and xylazine for anesthesia. Mice were then placed in a lateral decubitus position on the imaging stage of a Nikon C1si microscope. The ventral half of the ear was then dissected away with preservation of blood flow to the dorsal half verified under light microscopy. The mouse was then secured on the stage with the microscope objective directed toward the dermal surface. Images were compiled, analyzed, and rendered using Imaris software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland).
IgE Beads
Monoclonal, anti-trinitrophenol IgE (C38-2) was biotinylated with EZ-Link Sulfo NHS (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). After purification (Zeba Spin Desalting columns, Thermo Scientific), 40 µg of IgE (4B12, Vector Labs) was then combined with ~109 Dynal MyOne T1 streptavidin beads for 15 minutes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). To quench unoccupied streptavidin moieties and label the bead, 40 µg of dextran (3 kDa) coupled to biotin and tetramethylrhodamine was added to the mixture for 15 minutes (Invitrogen). The beads were then washed and resuspended in PBS prior to I.V. infusion. Ten minutes after infusion, ears were dissected from euthanized mice and analyzed intact using confocal microscopy. For the bead recovery assay, ears were harvested 20 minutes after infusion, weighed, and placed directly into digest buffer (0.25% SDS, 0.1 M NaCl, 50mM Tris pH 8, 7.5 mM EDTA) with an additional 0.5 mg/ml Proteinase K for 3 hours at 56 degrees and constant agitation. Magnetic beads were then isolated using a Dynal magnet (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) after multiple washes with PBS and resuspended in 100 ul of water. The beads were then counted manually with a hemacytometer.
LAMP-1 staining
Four hours after I.V. IgE infusion or IP challenge with 1 mg of TNP-ovalbumin in sensitized animals, peritoneal lavage fluid was isolated and ckit+GFP+ mast cells were stained with anti-CD107a (1D4B, eBioscience).
Histamine blockade and cromolyn sodium administration
Mice received inhibitors of mast cell degranulation (cromolyn) and histamine blockade per published protocols (Dawicki et al., 2010).
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Skin mast cells exhibit selective uptake of IgE from the blood
  • Selective uptake is localized to perivascular mast cells
  • Mast cells extend cellular processes to survey vascular contents and capture IgE
Supplementary Material
Movie 1
Movie 2
Movie 3
Movie 4
Movie 5
Movie 6
Supp Fig 1
Supp Fig 2
Supp fig 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the following grants to RML: the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, NIH AI026918, AI30663, AI078869, SABRE Center at UCSF and the following grants to LEC: NIH T32 (HD044331), AAAAI-GSK Career Development award, the A.P. Giannini Medical Research Foundation, and NIH AI095319. We thank Chris Allen and George Caughey for providing mice, and the Biological Imaging Development Center for assistance with microscopy. We thank members of the Locksley laboratory, Chris Allen, Jason Cyster, and Shaun Coughlin for thoughtful discussions and/or review of the manuscript. We also thank Paul Kubes for sharing experimental protocols.
Footnotes
The authors declare no financial conflicts of interest.
  • Cheng LE, Wang Z, Locksley RM. Murine B cells regulate serum IgE levels in a CD23- dependent manner. J Immunol. 2010:8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chieppa M, Rescigno M, Huang AY, Germain RN. Dynamic imaging of dendritic cell extension into the small bowel lumen in response to epithelial cell TLR engagement. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2841–2852. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Choi JH, Do Y, Cheong C, Koh H, Boscardin SB, Oh YS, Bozzacco L, Trumpfheller C, Park CG, Steinman RM. Identification of antigen-presenting dendritic cells in mouse aorta and cardiac valves. J Exp Med. 2009;206:497–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dawicki W, Jawdat DW, Xu N, Marshall JS. Mast cells, histamine, and IL-6 regulate the selective influx of dendritic cell subsets into an inflamed lymph node. J Immunol. 2010;184:2116–2123. [PubMed]
  • Dudeck A, Dudeck J, Scholten J, Petzold A, Surianarayanan S, Kohler A, Peschke K, Vohringer D, Waskow C, Krieg T, et al. Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity. 2011;34:973–984. [PubMed]
  • Feyerabend TB, Weiser A, Tietz A, Stassen M, Harris N, Kopf M, Radermacher P, Moller P, Benoist C, Mathis D, et al. Cre-Mediated Cell Ablation Contests Mast Cell Contribution in Models of Antibody- and T Cell-Mediated Autoimmunity. Immunity. 2011 [PubMed]
  • Fifadara NH, Beer F, Ono S, Ono SJ. Interaction between activated chemokine receptor 1 and FcepsilonRI at membrane rafts promotes communication and F-actin-rich cytoneme extensions between mast cells. Int Immunol. 2010;22:113–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Galli SJ, Tsai M. Mast cells in allergy and infection: Versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:1843–1851. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gekara NO, Weiss S. Mast cells initiate early anti-Listeria host defences. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10:225–236. [PubMed]
  • Gessner A, Mohrs K, Mohrs M. Mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils acquire constitutive IL-4 and IL-13 transcripts during lineage differentiation that are sufficient for rapid cytokine production. J Immunol. 2005;174:1063–1072. [PubMed]
  • Gould HJ, Sutton BJ. IgE in allergy and asthma today. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:205–217. [PubMed]
  • Grimbaldeston MA, Nakae S, Kalesnikoff J, Tsai M, Galli SJ. Mast cell-derived interleukin 10 limits skin pathology in contact dermatitis and chronic irradiation with ultraviolet B. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:1095–1104. [PubMed]
  • Hallgren J, Gurish MF. Pathways of murine mast cell development and trafficking: tracking the roots and routes of the mast cell. Immunol Rev. 2007;217:8–18. [PubMed]
  • Kambayashi T, Allenspach EJ, Chang JT, Zou T, Shoag JE, Reiner SL, Caton AJ, Koretzky GA. Inducible MHC class II expression by mast cells supports effector and regulatory T cell activation. J Immunol. 2009;182:4686–4695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kawakami T, Galli SJ. Regulation of mast-cell and basophil function and survival by IgE. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:773–786. [PubMed]
  • Kraft S, Kinet JP. New developments in FcepsilonRI regulation, function and inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:365–378. [PubMed]
  • Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. Biology of lung dendritic cells at the origin of asthma. Immunity. 2009;31:412–424. [PubMed]
  • Lee WY, Moriarty TJ, Wong CH, Zhou H, Strieter RM, van Rooijen N, Chaconas G, Kubes P. An intravascular immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi involves Kupffer cells and iNKT cells. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:295–302. [PubMed]
  • Locksley RM. Asthma and allergic inflammation. Cell. 2010;140:777–783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Luger EO, Fokuhl V, Wegmann M, Abram M, Tillack K, Achatz G, Manz RA, Worm M, Radbruch A, Renz H. Induction of long-lived allergen-specific plasma cells by mucosal allergen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:819–826. e814. [PubMed]
  • Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:133–140. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McMenamin C, Girn B, Holt PG. The distribution of IgE plasma cells in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues of high-IgE responder rats: differential localization of antigen-specific and 'bystander' components of the IgE response to inhaled antigen. Immunology. 1992;77:592–596. [PubMed]
  • Mohrs M, Shinkai K, Mohrs K, Locksley RM. Analysis of type 2 immunity in vivo with a bicistronic IL-4 reporter. Immunity. 2001;15:303–311. [PubMed]
  • Pereira JP, An J, Xu Y, Huang Y, Cyster JG. Cannabinoid receptor 2 mediates the retention of immature B cells in bone marrow sinusoids. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:403–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rescigno M, Urbano M, Valzasina B, Francolini M, Rotta G, Bonasio R, Granucci F, Kraehenbuhl JP, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P. Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:361–367. [PubMed]
  • Scholten J, Hartmann K, Gerbaulet A, Krieg T, Muller W, Testa G, Roers A. Mast cell-specific Cre/loxP-mediated recombination in vivo. Transgenic Res. 2008;17:307–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, Tsien RY. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1567–1572. [PubMed]
  • Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, Jessell TM, Costantini F. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol. 2001;1:4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Talay O, Yan D, Brightbill HD, Straney EE, Zhou M, Ladi E, Lee WP, Egen JG, Austin CD, Xu M, Wu LC. IgE memory B cells and plasma cells generated through a germinalcenter pathway. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:396–404. [PubMed]
  • Voehringer D, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Homeostasis and effector function of lymphopenia-induced"memory-like" T cells in constitutively T cell-depleted mice. J Immunol. 2008;180:4742–4753. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wolters PJ, Mallen-St Clair J, Lewis CC, Villalta SA, Baluk P, Erle DJ, Caughey GH. Tissue-selective mast cell reconstitution and differential lung gene expression in mast celldeficient Kit(W-sh)/Kit(W-sh) sash mice. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005;35:82–88. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yamaguchi M, Lantz CS, Oettgen HC, Katona IM, Fleming T, Miyajima I, Kinet JP, Galli SJ. IgE enhances mouse mast cell Fc(epsilon)RI expression in vitro and in vivo: evidence for a novel amplification mechanism in IgE-dependent reactions. J Exp Med. 1997;185:663–672. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Yang Z, Sullivan BM, Allen CD. Fluorescent In Vivo Detection Reveals that IgE(+) B Cells Are Restrained by an Intrinsic Cell Fate Predisposition. Immunity. 2012 [PubMed]
  • Zachariah MA, Cyster JG. Neural crest-derived pericytes promote egress of mature thymocytes at the corticomedullary junction. Science. 2010;328:1129–1135. [PMC free article] [PubMed]