1. Gordon J. Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: theoretical and historical perspectives. In: Carr J, Shepherd R, editors. Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. Rockville: Aspen Publishers; 1987. pp. 1–30.
2. Horak FB. Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation: contemporary management of motor control problems. Proceedings of the II Step Conference; Alexandria, VA: APTA; 1991. pp. 11–27.
3. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1995.
4. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke. Physiotherapy. 1999;85:377–391.
5. Gelber DA, Josefczyk PB, Herrman D, et al. Comparison of two therapy approaches in the rehabilitation of the pure motor hemiparetic stroke patient. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995;9:191–196.
6. Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG, van Wieringen PC, et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neurodevelopmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;22:1–8. [PubMed]
7. Coote S, Stokes E. Physiotherapy for upper extremity dysfunction following stroke. Phys Ther Rev. 2001;6:63–69.
8. Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther. 1986;66:1233–1238. [PubMed] 9. Ernst E. A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke. 1990;21:1081–1085. [PubMed] 10. Logigian M, Samuels M, Falconer J, et al. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:364–367. [PubMed] 11. Lord JP, Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:88–91. [PubMed] 12. Moreland J, Thompson MA. Efficacy of electromyographic feedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 1994;74:534–547. [PubMed] 13. Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA, et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:267–272. [PubMed]
14. Heckmann J, Mokrusch T, Krockel A, et al. EMG-triggered electrical muscle stimulation in the treatment of hemiparesis after a stroke. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;7:138–141.
15. Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220–227. [PubMed] 16. van der Lee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H, et al. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:20–31. [PubMed] 17. Jongbloed L, Stacey S, Brighton C. Stroke rehabilitation: sensorimotor integrative treatment versus functional treatment. Am J Occup Ther. 1989;43:391–397. [PubMed] 18. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:443–446. [PubMed] 19. Feys HM, DeWeerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998;29:785–792. [PubMed] 20. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53:1874–1876. [PubMed] 21. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989;104:125–132. [PubMed] 22. Vander Lee J, Wagenaar R, Lankhorst G, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369–2375. [PubMed]
23. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1998;43:152–170.
24. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:347–354. [PubMed] 25. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke. 1999;30:586–592. [PubMed] 26. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:624–628. [PubMed]
27. Tower SS. Pyramidal lesions in the monkey. Brain. 1940;63:36–90.
28. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1980. pp. 371–401.
29. Taub E, Goldberg IA, Taub P. Deafferentation in monkeys: pointing at a target without visual feedback. Exp Neurol. 1975;46:178–186. [PubMed] 30. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function: a single-case design. Phys Ther. 1981;61:1022–1028. [PubMed]
31. Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, et al. Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain behaviors. In: Tool J, Good D, editors. Imaging in Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York: Demos Publications; 1996. pp. 133–154.
32. Taub E, Wolf SL. Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 1997;3:38–61.
33. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31:2984–2988. [PubMed] 34. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with sub-acute stroke. Phys Ther. 1999;79:847–853. [PubMed] 35. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P, et al. Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38:583–590. [PubMed] 36. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. A clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237–251. [PubMed] 37. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1393–1403. [PubMed]
38. Winstein CJ. Designing practice for motor learning: clinical implications. Contemporary management of motor control problems; Proceedings of the II Step Conference; Alexandria, VA: APTA; 1991.
39. Schmidt R. Motor learning principles for physical therapy: contemporary management of motor control problems. Proceedings of the II Step Conference; Alexandria, VA: APTA; 1991.
40. Morris D, Taub E. Constraint-induced therapy approach to restoring function after neurological injury. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:16–30. [PubMed]
41. Carr J, Shepherd R. A Motor Relearning Programme for Stroke. 2. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1987.
42. Lettinga A, Siemonsma P, van Veen M. Entwinement of theory and practice in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 1999;85:476–490.
43. Rossini PM, Pauri F. Neuromagnetic integrated methods tracking human brain mechanisms of sensorimotor areas “plastic” reorganisation. Brain Res Rev. 2000;33:131–154. [PubMed]
44. Jones TA, Hawrylak N, Klintsova AY, et al. Brain damage, behavior, rehabilitation, recovery, and brain plasticity. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 1998;4:231–237.
45. Fisher B, Sullivan K. Activity-dependent factors affecting poststroke functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001;8:31–44. [PubMed] 46. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74:27–55. [PubMed] 47. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550–1556. [PubMed] 48. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196. [PubMed] 49. Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Topka HR, et al. Topographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:36–50. [PubMed] 50. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J Hand Ther. 1993;6:89–104. [PubMed] 51. Wu CW, Kaas JH. Reorganization in primary motor cortex of primates with long-standing therapeutic amputations. J Neurosci. 1999;19:7679–7697. [PubMed] 52. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, et al. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16:784–807. [PubMed] 53. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effect of rehabilitative training motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794. [PubMed] 54. Friel KM, Heddings AA, Nudo RJ. Effects of postlesion experience on behavioral recovery and neurophysiologic reorganization after cortical injury in primates. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14:187–198. [PubMed]
55. Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry R. Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;7:497–510.
56. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995;377:155–158. [PubMed] 57. Cao Y, D’Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, et al. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke. 1998;29:112–122. [PubMed] 58. Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, et al. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:463–472. [PubMed] 59. Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJS, et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral-cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;33:181–189. [PubMed] 60. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:2518–2527. [PubMed] 61. Binkofski F, Seitz RJ, Hacklander T, et al. Recovery of motor functions following hemiparetic stroke: a clinical and magnetic resonance-morphometric study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:273–281. [PubMed] 62. Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJS, et al. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol. 1991;29:63–71. [PubMed] 63. Nelles G, Spiekermann G, Jueptner M, et al. Reorganization of sensory and motor systems in hemiplegic stroke patients: a positron emission tomography study. Stroke. 1999;30:1510–1516. [PubMed] 64. Seitz RJ, Hoflich P, Binkofski F, et al. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1081–1088. [PubMed] 65. Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, et al. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. Brain. 2002;125:773–788. [PubMed] 66. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:4–12. [PubMed] 67. Barker AT. The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;51:3–21. [PubMed]
68. Beric A. Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation. In: Devinsky O, Beric A, Dogali M, editors. Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain and Spinal Cord. New York: Raven Press; 1993. pp. 29–42.
69. Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;108:1–16. [PubMed] 70. Epstein CM, Scwartzberg DG, Davey KR, et al. Localizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation in humans. Neurology. 1990;40:666–670. [PubMed]
71. Ziemann U. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: its current role in the evaluation of patients post-stroke. Neurol Rep. 2000;24:82–93.
72. Brasil-Neto JP, McShane LM, Fuhr F, et al. Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:9–16. [PubMed] 73. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise S, et al. Rapid plasticity of human movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:1117–1123. [PubMed] 74. Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Enhancing the quality of studies using transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation with a new computer-controlled system. J Neurosci Methods. 2000;102:81–89. [PubMed] 75. Liepert J, Classen J, Cohen LG, et al. Task dependent changes of intracortical inhibition. Exp Brain Res. 1998;118:421–426. [PubMed] 76. Mortifee P, Stewart H, Schulzer M, et al. The reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;93:131–137. [PubMed] 77. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31:1210–1216. [PubMed] 78. Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Bassi A, et al. Interhemispheric differences of hand muscle restoration in human motor cortex. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20:535–542. [PubMed] 79. Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Oliveri M, et al. Intracortical excitatory and inhibitory phenomena to paired transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy human subjects: differences between right and left hemisphere. Neurosci Lett. 2000;288:171–174. [PubMed] 80. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Rossini PM, et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke: a brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke. 1997;28:110–117. [PubMed] 81. Netz J, Lammers T, Homberg V. Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain. 1997;120:1579–1586. [PubMed] 82. Pennisi G, Rapisarda G, Bella R, et al. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke. 1999;30:2666–2670. [PubMed] 83. Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;97:349–354. [PubMed] 84. Rossini PM, Caltagirone C, Castriota-Scanderbeg A, et al. Hand motor cortical reorganization in stroke: a study with fMRI MEG and TCS maps. Neuroreport. 1998;9:2141–2146. [PubMed] 85. Rossini PM, Rossi S. Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;106:180–194. [PubMed] 86. Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, et al. Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;101:321–326. [PubMed] 87. Classen J, Liepert J, Hallet M, et al. Plasticity of movement representation in the human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;51:162–173. [PubMed] 88. Liepert J, Miltner WHR, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett. 1998;250:5–8. [PubMed] 89. Schiene K, Bruehl C, Zilles K, et al. Neuronal hyperexcitability and reduction of GABA A receptor expression in the surround of cerebral photothrombosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:906–914. [PubMed] 90. Jacobs KM, Donoghue JP. Reshaping the cortical map by unmasking latent intracortical connections. Science. 1991;251:944–947. [PubMed] 91. Ziemann U, Ishii K, Borgheresi A, et al. Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor-evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles. J Physiol. 1999;518:895–906. [PubMed] 92. Hagemann G, Redecker C, Neumann-Haefelin T, et al. Increased long-term potentiation in the surround of experimentally induced focal cortical infarction. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:255–258. [PubMed] 93. Thickbroom GW, Sammut R, Mastaglia FL. Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex factors contributing to map area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;109:79–84. [PubMed] 94. Georgopoulos AP. New concepts in generation of movement. Neuron. 1994;13:257–268. [PubMed] 95. Kwan HC, MacKay WA, Murphy JT, et al. Spatial organization of precentral cortex in awake primates, II: motor outputs. J Neurophysiol. 1978;41:1120–1131. [PubMed] 96. Sanes JN, Donoghue JP, Thangaraj V, et al. Shared neural substrate controlling hand movement in human motor cortex. Science. 1995;268:1775–1777. [PubMed] 97. Wassermann EM, McShane LM, Hallet M, et al. Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;85:1–8. [PubMed] 98. Taub E, Burgio L, Groomes T, et al. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;61:281–293. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
99. Morris DM, DeLuca S, Pidikiti R, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation. 1997;9:29–43.
100. Kopp B, Kunkel A, Muhlnickel W, et al. Plasticity in the motor system related to therapy-induced improvement of movement after stroke. Neuroreport. 1999;10:807–810. [PubMed] 101. Sabari JS, Kane L, Flanagan SR, et al. Constraint-induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:524–528. [PubMed] 102. Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2001;248:315–321. [PubMed]