PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of eidLink to Publisher's site
 
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 February; 19(2): 297–300.
PMCID: PMC3563275

Transmission and Maintenance Cycle of Bartonella quintana among Rhesus Macaques, China

Abstract

We detected Bartonella quintana in 48.6% of captive rhesus macaques from an animal facility in Beijing, China. Prevalence of infection increased over the period of observation. Our findings suggest that macaques may serve as reservoir hosts for B. quintana and that Pedicinus obtusus lice might act as efficient vectors.

Keywords: Bartonella quintana, rhesus macaques, reservoir host, lice, transmission, China, vector-borne infections, Bartonella

Bartonella quintana is a vector-transmitted, hemotropic, and extremely fastidious gram-negative bacterium. Infection with B. quintana has been recognized to cause a broad spectrum of disease, including trench fever, chronic bacteremia, endocarditis, and bacillary angiomatosis (14). Humans are the primary reservoir host for B. quintana, which, unlike most other Bartonella species, lacks an identified animal reservoir, although some recent reports have found B. quintana in dogs and in cynomolgus and rhesus macaques (57). Almost 60 years ago, rhesus macaques were able to be experimentally infected with B. quintana (8). However, nonhuman primates have not been shown to support long-term maintenance, multiplication, and transmission of this pathogen, all of which would be expected if these animals were to act as reservoir species. Observations of monkey ectoparasites transmitting B. quintana between nonhuman primates or infecting humans have also not been reported.

The Study

A laboratory animal surveillance program intended to screen for the presence of adventitious pathogens was performed at the Laboratory Animal Center of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. Four blood samples from 10 captive-bred rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were presumed to be infected with Bartonella spp. according to Giemsa-stained smears and transmission electron microscopy (Technical Appendix Figure 1). Further PCR and sequence analysis of 3 gene targets (internal transcribed spacer [ITS], gltA, and rnpB) confirmed the existence of B. quintana in the 4 parasite-positive macaques (Technical Appendix Table 1). In addition, B. quintana was successfully isolated from the 4 monkeys by blood plating.

Figure 1
Monitoring surveillance of Bartonella quintana infection in macaques and identification of lice. A) Macaques were housed in linked cages (squares); dashed lines indicate wired net enabling direct contact between macaques, and solid line indicates wall ...

During the 36-day period of observation, 3 screening tests of the 10 macaques showed an increasing prevalence of B. quintana: 4 were found positive at day 1, 7 positive at day 15, and all 10 positive at day 35 (Figure 1, panel A). Close examination of the monkeys revealed no skin scratch or wound indicative of direct contact between them.

Examination for ectoparasites at the last day of observation (day 36) revealed that all 10 monkeys were infested with lice (mean 10.3 lice/monkey, range 4–28 lice). Lice from each infested monkey were combined in 2 pools. B. quintana was identified in all pools of lice by PCR selective for ITS, gltA, and rnpB. Partial Cytb sequence (660-bp) of the louse was obtained (GenBank accession no. JX070558) (Technical Appendix Table 1); phylogenetic analysis of Cytb identified the louse as a relative of lice of the genus Pedicinus (Figure 2, panel A). By means of stereomicroscopy, the louse was then identified as Pedicinus obtusus (Figure 1, panel B), a macaque-specific ectoparasite, according to morphologic criteria (9,10).

Figure 2
Phylogenetic analyses of louse species and Bartonella spp. A) Phylogenetic tree of louse species based on the partial Cytb sequence (364-bp), obtained by using the neighbor-joining method with maximum composite likelihood analysis and bootstrap analysis ...

Of the 60 rhesus macaques (27 male, 33 female) housed in 5 other rooms in individual cages in the same facility, an additional 30 were found to be positive for B. quintana by PCR. B. quintana prevalence among sexually immature macaques was higher than that among sexually mature macaques, but this difference was not significant (29/54 [53.7%] vs. 1/6 [16.7%], respectively; p = 0.195). B. quintana prevalence among male macaques was similar to that among females (15/27 [55.6%] vs. 15/33 [45.5%], respectively).

Nucleotide sequences of ITS (123-bp), gltA (539-bp), and rnpB (336-bp) from all macaques and pools of lice were identical; they differed from from those of B. quintana strain Toulouse by1–3 bp . Phylogenetic markers rnpB, 16S rRNA, and 23S rRNA (11) were amplified and sequenced from the strain identified in this study (RM-11) (Technical Appendix Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis of their combined sequence alignment placed the RM-11 strain on a separate branch along with the strain of B. quintana from a cynomolgus macaque and in the same clade as strains from patients in Europe who had trench fever (strains Toulouse and Fuller) (Figure 2, panel B).

To evaluate the ability of the isolate to cause disease, we intravenously inoculated 4 Bartonella spp.–negative rhesus macaques with B. quintana isolated from a blood sample of a macaque from this study and twice passaged on agar (detailed methods described in the Technical Appendix). Bacteremia reached a peak in 1 monkey on day 7 postinoculation (160 CFU/mL), in 2 monkeys on day 14 postinoculation (290 and 240 CFU/mL), and in 1 monkey on day 42 postinoculation (240 CFU/mL). Bacteremia then dropped to below a detectable level after 15 weeks postinoculation for all monkeys (Technical Appendix Figure 2). A relapsing pattern of bacteremia was observed during the experiment. Rectal temperature, hemogram, and blood biochemistry results for the 4 monkeys remained within normal limits.

The animal facility employees who had direct contact with monkeys during cage cleaning and feeding activities were tested for B. quintana infection. Paired serum samples collected at 2 time points 3 months apart were tested for IgG against B. quintana by indirect immunofluorescence assay, as described (12). The baseline serum samples were all negative at a dilution of 1:64. Among the serum samples collected 3 months later, 3 had IgG titers of 256, 1 had a titer of 512, and 4 were negative. For all blood samples collected at the 2 time points, PCR detection, blood-smear staining, and blood culture for Bartonella spp. were negative. Analysis of questionnaires revealed that all 4 of the workers with evidence of seroconversion reported lice exposure; 2 of them were scratched or bitten by monkeys.

Conclusions

We demonstrated high prevalence of B. quintana in a colony of rhesus macaques and postulated the transmission among macaques by P. obtusus lice. Our findings suggest that macaques are susceptible to B. quintana infection and can sustain vector infection and subsequent transmission. In addition, rhesus macaques showed long-lasting chronic bacteremia without apparent clinical abnormalities after experimental inoculation, suggesting a high level of adaptation of the pathogen to macaques.

It is unknown how the macaques were initially exposed to infected lice or how the lice became infected with B. quintana. We postulate that the lice became infected with B. quintana from an infected macaque and thereafter acted as efficient vectors among the rest of the macaques in the colony. We cannot completely exclude the possibility that transmission occurred through direct contact between macaques within the colony; however, we did not observe any skin scratches or wounds on the animals.

Four workers involved with care of the macaques showed seroconversion to antigens derived from our strain. This finding may relate to exposure to the P. obtusus lice found on macaques in the animal facility; however, we cannot exclude the possibility of direct contact with these animals as the mode of Bartonella spp. transmission because information obtained from the questionnaires indicates that 2 of the 4 seropositive workers were scratched or bitten by the colony’s macaques. No clinical signs were observed from these persons, indicating an asymptomatic course of B. quintana infection, which has been frequently reported in other studies (1,13). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that bacteremia continued for an extended time in humans, because the animal care personnel were sampled only 2 times, so we might have missed bacteremia of short duration. Bacterial levels obtained after monkey inoculation was low compared with levels in the initial inoculum, a finding similar to that of a previous study (14).

In summary, our findings suggest that the macaques might serve as reservoir hosts for B. quintana and that lice might act as efficient vectors. Our data also indicate that macaques could be a source for human infection with B. quintana. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanism of B. quintana transmission by the P. obtusus louse.

Technical Appendix:

Detailed methods of inoculation of 4 Bartonella spp.–negative rhesus macaques with isolate from captive rhesus macaques in Beijing; nucleotide sequence of primers used for PCR analysis; GenBank accession numbers of Bartonella strains used for phylogenetic analysis; analysis of thin-film blood smear and peripheral blood from rhesus macaque; and timeline of bloodstream infections of B. quintana strain RM-11 in 4 rhesus macaques.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Ying Bai for her help with culture of B. quintana.

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81130086, 81222037, and 81072250), Chinese Basic Research Project (2010CB530201), and Special Fund for Health Research in the Public Interest (201202019).

Biography

• 

Mr Li is an MD candidate in the State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology. His research interests include microbiology, epidemiology, and ecology of vector-borne diseases.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Li H, Liu W, Zhang G-Z, Sun Z-Z, Bai J-Y, Jiang B-G, et al. Transmission and maintenance cycle of Bartonella quintana among rhesus macaques, China. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Feb [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1902.120816

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Reference

1. Brouqui P, Lascola B, Roux V, Raoult D. Chronic Bartonella quintana bacteremia in homeless patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:184–9 10.1056/NEJM199901213400303 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Drancourt M, Mainardi JL, Brouqui P, Vandenesch F, Carta A, Lehnert F, et al. Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana endocarditis in three homeless men. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:419–23 10.1056/NEJM199502163320702 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Klein JL, Nair SK, Harrison TG, Hunt I, Fry NK, Friedland JS. Prosthetic valve endocarditis caused by Bartonella quintana. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:202–3 10.3201/eid0802.010206 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Koehler JE, Sanchez MA, Garrido CS, Whitfeld MJ, Chen FM, Berger TG, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Bartonella infections in patients with bacillary angiomatosis-peliosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1876–83 10.1056/NEJM199712253372603 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Chomel BB, Boulouis HJ, Maruyama S, Breitschwerdt EB. Bartonella spp. in pets and effect on human health. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:389–94 10.3201/eid1203.050931 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. O'Rourke LG, Pitulle C, Hegarty BC, Kraycirik S, Killary KA, Grosenstein P, et al. Bartonella quintana in cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1931–4 10.3201/eid1112.030045 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Huang R, Liu Q, Li G, Li D, Song X, Birtles RJ, et al. Bartonella quintana infections in captive monkeys, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1707–9 10.3201/eid1709.110133 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Mooser H, Weyer F. Experimental infection of Macacus rhesus with Rickettsia quintana (trench fever). Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953;83:699–701 . [PubMed]
9. Kim KC, Ludwig HW. The family classification of the Anoplura. Syst Ent. 1978;3:249–84 10.1111/j.1365-3113.1978.tb00120.x [Cross Ref]
10. Jin S, Rao J, Liu X, Wen Y, Lian J. Diagnosis and therapy of Pedicinus obtusus Infection on Macaca mulatta. Chin J Comp Med. 2006;16:424–5
11. Pitulle C, Strehse C, Brown JW, Breitschwerdt EB. Investigation of the phylogenetic relationships within the genus Bartonella based on comparative sequence analysis of the rnpB gene, 16S rDNA and 23S rDNA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:2075–80 10.1099/ijs.0.02281-0 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Kosoy MY, Regnery RL, Tzianabos T, Marston EL, Jones DC, Green DE, et al. Distribution, diversity, and host specificity of Bartonella in rodents from the southeastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;57:578–88 . [PubMed]
13. Bass JW, Vincent JM, Person DA. The expanding spectrum of Bartonella infections: I. Bartonellosis and trench fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16:2–10 10.1097/00006454-199701000-00003 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Zhang P, Chomel BB, Schau MK, Goo JS, Droz S, Kelminson KL, et al. A family of variably expressed outer-membrane proteins (Vomp) mediates adhesion and autoaggregation in Bartonella quintana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13630–5 10.1073/pnas.0405284101 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention