PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of bioresMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlertsBioResearch Open Access
 
Biores Open Access. 2012 August; 1(4): 192–198.
PMCID: PMC3559235

Butyrate Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Abstract

In addition to being a part of the metabolic fatty acid fuel cycle, butyrate is also capable of inducing growth arrest in a variety of normal cell types and senescence-like phenotypes in gynecological cancer cells, inhibiting DNA synthesis and cell growth in colonic tumor cell lines, suppressing hTERT mRNA expression and telomerase activity in human prostate cancer cells, and inducing stem cell differentiation and apoptosis by DNA fragmentation. It regulates gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs), enhances memory recovery and formation in mice, stimulates neurogenesis in the ischemic brain, promotes osteoblast formation, selectively blocks cell replication in transformed cells (compared to healthy cells), and can prevent and treat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mouse models of obesity, as well as stimulate fetal hemoglobin expression in individuals with hematologic diseases such as the thalassemias and sickle-cell disease, in addition to a multitude of other biochemical effects in vivo. However, efforts to exploit the potential of butyrate in the clinical treatment of cancer and other medical disorders are thwarted by its poor pharmacological properties (short half-life and first-pass hepatic clearance) and the multigram doses needed to achieve therapeutic concentrations in vivo. Herein, we review some of the methods used to overcome these difficulties with an emphasis on HDAC inhibition.

Key words: acylcarnitine, butyrate, butyrylcarnitine, carnitine, histone deacetylase

Introduction

In a seminal article published in 1990, a Japanese group1 reported that (R)-trichostatin A (a fungal antibiotic, Fig. 1) is a potent and specific inhibitor of mammalian histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in vivo, and that this inhibition strongly induced tumor cell apoptosis, a process that can be mediated epigenetically by regulating the histone function. Since that time, research into the roles HDAC enzymes play in cancer development, progression, and survival has led to the identification of other histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi),25 and several of these have been evaluated in clinical trials, primarily for the treatment of hematologic malignancies.68 HDACi are also being investigated for synergistic cytotoxicity in combination therapies with conventional chemotherapy and targeted agents against solid tumors.912 One of the combination strategies fuses the cytotoxic platinum DNA-binding potential of platinum agents and HDAC inhibitory activity into a single molecular entity.13 In 2006, vorinostat (SAHA, Zolinza®, Fig. 1) became the first HDAC inhibitor to be clinically approved by the Food and Drug Administration14 for use in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (a rare form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that localizes to the skin). In clinical trials, vorinostat has failed as a monotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (and other solid tumors). However, in combination with paclitaxel and bevacizumab as a first-line therapy, the results are more promising.15

FIG. 1.
Hydroxamic acid HDACi: trichostatin A and vorinostat. HDACi, histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Mammalian HDAC Isoforms

The mammalian HDAC family of enzymes consists of at least 18 isoforms that are grouped into four principal class types according to their expression patterns and sequence homology relative to the yeast HDAC proteins.16 Class I (HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8) proteins are found predominantly in the nucleus; Class IIa (HDACs 4, 5, 7, and 9) and Class IIb (HDACs 6 and 10) shuttle between the nucleus and the cytoplasm; Class III enzymes, known as the sirtuins (Sirt1–7), are a silent information regulator (Sir)2 family of proteins17,18 that are NAD+-dependent deacetylases inhibited by nicotinamide;1820 and Class IV (which contains only HDAC 11) has properties of both Class I and Class II HDACs, and like the Class I and Class IIa/b isoforms, uses a lysine residue to bind to Zn2+ in the active state.3,18,21

In addition to the histone proteins, some nonhistone proteins are also targeted by histone acetyltransferases (referred to as HATs2224 in keeping with the historical histone relationship) and deacetylases (referred to as HDACs), and as a consequence, acetylation and deacetylation processes figure prominently in mitigating cellular function and activity as well as transcriptional and chromatin-related processes.18,25 Choudhary et al.26 undertook a mass-spectral-based study designed to analyze sites of lysine-specific HDACs (KDACs) and concluded that protein modification by acetylation in vivo could be as common as an event as phosphorylation2729—a hypothesis predicted a decade earlier by Kouzarides.30 Acetyl is the primary acyl group exchanged by the HATs and HDACs, although propionyl and butyryl may also be substrates.20,3133 Typically, histone acetylation is associated with the activation of gene transcription, whereas deacetylation is associated with transcriptional repression.34 Similarly, methylation and demethylation are alternative pathways cells utilize to effect epigenetic changes.23,35,36 Strahl and Allis37 suggest that combinatorial sequences of epigenetic changes represent a histone language sometimes referred to as a histone code that proteins could read, write, erase, and modify.38 Importantly, since the energy needed to support epigenetic transformations in a cell is provided by its mitochondria, nuclear and mitochondrial genomic interactions in the cell are coordinated.18

DNA Accessibility

In mammalian cells, the genome is tightly packed into chromatin units called nucleosomes, which consist of ~147-base-pair segments of DNA wrapped around a core of eight histones (two each of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4).39,40 Electrostatic forces between positive-charged lysine residues on the histone proteins and negative-charged phosphates on the DNA backbone allow the nucleosome to adopt a highly condensed three-dimensional structure that limits access to the DNA segment by transcription factors and other DNA-seeking chemicals. For example, for a segment of DNA to be read by the cell's transcriptional machinery, the DNA must first be made accessible. One means by which this is achieved in the cell is through acetylation by HAT36 of the lysine residues on the histone tails protruding from the nucleosome cores.24,40 This neutralizes the positive charges on the histone tails (relieving electrostatic forces that keep the histone–DNA pair bound closely together) and exposes the DNA.39 Once transcription has been completed, HDAC enzymes remove the N-acetyl groups from the acetylated lysine residues, which restores positive charge to the histone and draws the DNA back into its protected, less-accessible tertiary structure.5

Consequently, inhibiting HDACs can cause gene activation to be initiated or prolonged—an effect that has a therapeutic application across a wide-spectrum of disease phenotypes, as well as in the ex vivo production of stem cells by induced pluripotency (reprogramming),41,42 for use in the emerging field of regenerative therapy.43,44 As a result, much effort is directed toward identifying druggable HDACi with therapeutic potential, particularly of the small-molecule type.7,4551

n-Butyric Acid

n-Butyric acid, a short-chain naturally occurring fatty acid, is produced in transient amounts during the natural synthesis and breakdown of longer-chain fatty acids in vivo. A significant source in the diet comes from dairy products (such as Greek feta cheese) containing lamb rennet.52,53 However, n-butyric acid (butyrate) is also endogenously made in the human body by anaerobic bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates (derived from dietary fiber) in the colon,5456 but in addition to being a part of the metabolic fatty acid fuel cycle,57,58 butyrate is also capable of inducing growth arrest in a variety of normal cell types and senescence-like phenotypes in gynecological cancer cells,59,60 inhibiting DNA synthesis and cell growth in colonic tumor cell lines,6164 suppressing hTERT mRNA expression and telomerase activity in human prostate cancer cells,65 and inducing stem cell differentiation6671 and apoptosis by DNA fragmentation.72 It regulates gene expression by inhibiting HDACs,73,74 enhances memory recovery and formation in mice,75 stimulates neurogenesis in the ischemic brain,70,76,77 promotes osteoblast formation,78 selectively blocks cell replication in transformed cells (compared to healthy cells),7981 and can prevent and treat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mouse models of obesity,82 as well as stimulate fetal hemoglobin expression in individuals with hematologic diseases such as the thalassemias and sickle-cell disease,8385 in addition to a multitude of other biochemical effects in vivo.8688

However, efforts to exploit the potential of butyrate in the clinical treatment of cancer and other medical disorders are thwarted by its poor pharmacological properties (short half-life and first-pass hepatic clearance) and the multigram doses needed to achieve therapeutic concentrations in vivo.39,79,8995 Prodrugs of butyric acid96,97 such as Pivanex98100 and tributyrin58,94,101 (Fig. 2) help mitigate the impediments, but have not been viable as therapeutic agents. Nonetheless, the arginine salt of butyrate has been utilized successfully in clinical studies for the therapy of sickle-cell disease,102,103 thalassemia,104 Epstein-Barr Virus-related malignancies,6 and chronic, non-healing wounds,105 clearly demonstrating the proof of principle for butyrate-based epigenetic therapeutic approaches to these diseases.

FIG. 2.
Butyrate HDACi: butyric acid, Pivanex, and tributyrin.

Short-Chain Fatty Acids

Although not as potent as butyric acid, other short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like valproic acid and 4-phenylbutyrate (Fig. 3) also have HDAC inhibitory activity.106,107 However, a structure–activity relationship study carried out by Gilbert et al.108 found that nonbranching SCFAs having three to five carbon atoms in length (Fig. 4) are the best inhibitors of HDACs. According to Gilbert et al.108 branching decreases the inhibition of HDACs relative to that observed with n-propionate, n-butyrate, or n-pentanoate. Among the branched-chain acids, valproate exhibited the greatest activity with 2,2-dimethylbutyric acid109,110 and 2-ethylbutyric acid exhibiting only half the activity of valproate. The observations are consistent with the Lu et al.111,112 model of the active site of HDACs being a narrow tube-like pocket, spanning a length equivalent to a straight chain of four to six carbon atoms, with a Zn2+-chelating moiety positioned near the bottom to help facilitate the deacetylation catalysis.113116 Interestingly, pyruvate, the three-carbon chain end-product of glycolysis, is an endogenous HDAC inhibitor, whereas lactate is not.117 Thus, the tumor-associated cytoplasmic diversion of pyruvate into lactate (the Warburg effect) may serve not only to induce a state of apoptosis resistance by suppressing mitochondrial activity in the tumor cell118 but also as a means for the tumor cell to avoid HDAC inhibition, a potential alternate and suicidal pathway.

FIG. 3.
Short-chain fatty acid HDACi: valproic acid and phenylbutyric acid.
FIG. 4.
Variable short-chain fatty acid HDACi.

Cellular Uptake by Transport Proteins

While prodrugs can facilitate cell penetration and help prolong bioavailability, their metabolic cleavage does not necessarily result in therapeutic concentrations of the drug being delivered where needed. Cellular uptake of fatty acids, butyric acid included, is achieved with the aid of specific transporters119,120 and cell surface receptors.120,121 Likewise, cellular entry of carbohydrates is also tightly regulated by carbohydrate-specific transporters and cell surface receptors.120,122,123 The most sensitive clinical test for detecting occult metastases is the enhanced uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose in vivo by cancer cells compared to normal cells as determined by positron-emission tomography124—implying that glucose (and other natural carbohydrate) scaffolds may be used to carry (cytotoxic) substrates selectively into cancer cells.125127 This construct was applied to butyrate and other SCFAs,33,79,128131 for example, Bu4ManNAc and 3,4,6-O-Bu3GlcNAc (Fig. 5).125,130 However, though families of transporters exist for the common dietary sugars such as glucose, they are refractory to modified derivatives (substituted carbohydrates) or analogs, and without assisted cell membrane crossing, cellular uptake of non-natural sugars is limited.122

FIG. 5.
Anticancer sugar-based HDACi butyrates.

Butyryl-l-Carnitine Esters

An alternative delivery method we118,132,133 and others134138 have found to be an effective transporter of modified SCFA substrates in vivo utilizes the cell's natural carnitine–acylcarnitine transport machinery. More than 100 years ago, Knoop139 published a seminal study on the metabolism of omega-phenyl-substituted fatty acids that he fed to dogs. When the dogs were fed odd-chain-substituted fatty acids, hippuric acid (2-benzamidoacetic acid) was found in their urine, and when fed even-chain-substituted fatty acids, phenylaceturic acid [2-(2-phenylacetamido)acetic acid] was the result.140 To account for these findings, he proposed that the metabolism proceeds by the successive removal of two carbon units via the existence of a mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation pathway—a type of carbon oxidation having no reported examples in organic chemistry at the time.140

However, to enter the mitochondrial inner matrix, where β-oxidation takes place, fatty acids (presenting as acylcarnitines)140 are passaged through the mitochondrial membrane via the carnitine acyltransferase pathway.141 Long-chain fatty acids are obligated to be processed this way, but SCFAs can also use this pathway too.142 Thus, as Srinivas et al.135 reported, butyryl-l-carnitine can act as a prodrug for delivering butyrate into cells in vivo, and our own studies (article in preparation) found that butyryl-l-carnitines, PMX 550B and PMX 550D (Fig. 6), are more potent HDACi than butyrate itself.

FIG. 6.
Butyryl-l-carnitines.

Conclusions

Unlike the sugar transporters, which highly discriminate against synthetically modified sugars, the acylcarnitine transporters appear to tolerate a range of acyl-substrate variations118 that can traverse both the plasma118,135,140 and blood–brain barriers.133,134 PMX 550B and PMX 550D are strong butyrate HDACi, and their potential for oral delivery and mitigation of short-half life may lead to more effective epigenetic therapeutics for treating the thalassemias, sickle-cell disease, neurological disorders, and cancer.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Foundation for a Cure for Mitochondrial Disease (MitoCure) and from the Karin Grunebaum Cancer Research Foundation, and by the grants: DK-R01-052962, R41 HL-110727, CA-153474, and T32 HL007501 from the National Institutes of Health, and by a grant from the V Foundation.

Authors' Contributions

The article was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the article.

Author Disclosure Statement

K.S. owns shares in PhenoMatriX. No competing financial interests exist.

References

1. Yoshida M. Kijima M. Akita M, et al. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:17174–17179. [PubMed]
2. Dashwood RH. Ho E. Dietary histone deacetylase inhibitors: From cells to mice to man. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007;17:363–369. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Balasubramanian S. Verner E. Buggy JJ. Isoform-specific histone deacetylase inhibitors: The next step? Cancer Lett. 2009;280:211–221. [PubMed]
4. Ma WW. Adjei AA. Novel agents on the horizon for cancer therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:111–137. [PubMed]
5. Newkirk TL. Bowersab AA. Williams RM. Discovery, biological activity, synthesis and potential therapeutic utility of naturally occurring histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nat Prod Rep. 2009;26:1293–1320. [PubMed]
6. Perrine SP. Hermine O. Small T, et al. A phase 1/2 trial of arginine butyrate and ganciclovir in patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2007;109:2571–2578. [PubMed]
7. Wang H. Dymock BW. New patented histone deacetylase inhibitors. Expert Opin Ther Patents. 2009;19:1727–1757. [PubMed]
8. Robey RW. Chakraborty AR. Basseville A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Emerging mechanisms of resistance. Mol Pharm. 2011;8:2021–2031. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Bots M. Johnstone RW. Rational combinations using HDAC inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:3970–3977. [PubMed]
10. Graham JS. Kaye SB. Brown R. The promises and pitfalls of epigenetic therapies in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1129–1136. [PubMed]
11. Ramalingam SS. Maitland ML. Frankel P, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either vorinostat or placebo for first-line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:56–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Tan J. Cang S. Ma Y, et al. Novel histone deacetylase inhibitors in clinical trials as anti-cancer agents. J Hematol Oncol. 2010;3:5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Griffith D. Morgan MP. Marmion CJ. A novel anti-cancer bifunctional platinum drug candidate with dual DNA binding and histone deacetylase inhibitory activity. Chem Commun. 2009;45:6735–6737. [PubMed]
14. Grant S. Easley C. Kirkpatrick P. Vorinostat. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:21–22. [PubMed]
15. Fernández Y. Cueva J. Palomo AG, et al. Novel therapeutic approaches to the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:33–42. [PubMed]
16. Minucci S. Pelicci PG. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:38–51. [PubMed]
17. Beher D. Wu J. Cumine S, et al. Resveratrol is not a direct activator of SIRT1 enzyme activity. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2009;74:619–624. [PubMed]
18. Wallace DC. Fan W. Energetics, epigenetics, mitochondrial genetics. Mitochondrion. 2010;10:12–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Dai Y. Faller DV. Transcriptional regulation by class III histone deacetylases (sirtuins) Transl Oncogenomics. 2008;3:53–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Smith BC. Hallows WC. Denu JM. Mechanisms and molecular probes of sirtuins. Chem Biol. 2008;15:1002–1013. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Bäckdahl L. Bushell A. Beck S. Inflammatory signalling as mediator of epigenetic modulation in tissue-specific chronic inflammation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:176–184. [PubMed]
22. Manzo F. Tambaro FP. Mai A, et al. Histone acetyltransferase inhibitors and preclinical studies. Expert Opin Ther Patents. 2009;19:761–774. [PubMed]
23. Munshi A. Shafi G. Aliya N, et al. Histone modifications dictate specific biological readouts. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36:75–88. [PubMed]
24. Sleiman SF. Basso M. Mahishi L, et al. Putting the ‘HAT’ back on survival signalling: The promises and challenges of HDAC inhibition in the treatment of neurological conditions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18:573–584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Mellert HS. McMahon SB. Biochemical pathways that regulate acetyltransferase and deacetylase activity in mammalian cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:571–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Choudhary C. Kumar C. Gnad F, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science. 2009;325:834–840. [PubMed]
27. Smith KT. Workman JL. Introducing the acetylome. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:917–1010. [PubMed]
28. Norvell A. McMahon SB. Rise of the rival. Science. 2010;327:964–968. [PubMed]
29. Zhao S. Xu W. Jiang W, et al. Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science. 2010;327:1000–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Kouzarides T. Acetylation: A regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation? EMBO J. 2000;19:1176–1179. [PubMed]
31. Chen Y. Sprung R. Tang Y, et al. Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007;6:812–819. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Berndsen CE. Denu JM. Catalysis and substrate selection by histone/protein lysine acetyltransferases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18:682–689. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Zhang K. Chen Y. Zhang Z, et al. Identification and verification of lysine propionylation and butyrylation in yeast core histones using PTMap software. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:900–906. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Adachi M. Monteggia LM. Synergistic interactions between histone deacetylase inhibitors and drugs of abuse. Nat Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;34:2619–2620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Delage B. Dashwood RH. Dietary manipulation of histone structure and function. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008;28:347–366. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. McGowan PO. Meaney MJ. Szyf M. Diet and the epigenetic (re)programming of phenotypic differences in behavior. Brain Res. 2008;1237:12–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Strahl BD. Allis D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature. 2000;403:41–45. [PubMed]
38. Perkel JM. Histone code-breakers: The technologies of an epigenetic enigma. Biotechniques. 2010;48:185–191. [PubMed]
39. Yoo CB. Jones PA. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: Past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:37–50. [PubMed]
40. Campos EI. Reinberg D. Histones: Annotating chromatin. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:559–599. [PubMed]
41. de Souza M. Primer: Induced pluripotency. Nat Methods. 2010;7:20–21. [PubMed]
42. Eisenstein M. IPSCs: One cell to rule them all? Nat Methods. 2010;7:81–85.
43. Graf T. Enver T. Forcing cells to change lineages. Nature. 2009;462:587–504. [PubMed]
44. Sang Y. Wu M-F. Wagner D. The stem cell—chromatin connection. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:1143–1148. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Miller TA. Witter DJ. Belvedere S. Histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2003;46:5097–5116. [PubMed]
46. Itoh Y. Suzuki T. Kouketsu A, et al. Design, synthesis, structure-selectivity relationship, and effect on human cancer cells of a novel series of histone deacetylase 6-selective inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2007;50:5425–5438. [PubMed]
47. Mahboobi S. Sellmer A. Höcher H, et al. 2-Aroylindoles and 2-aroylbenzofurans with N-hydroxyacrylamide substructures as a novel series of rationally designed histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2007;50:4405–4418. [PubMed]
48. Methot JL. Chakravarty PK. Chenard M, et al. Exploration of the internal cavity of histone deacetylase (HDAC) with selective HDAC1/HDAC2 inhibitors (SHI-1:2) Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:973–978. [PubMed]
49. Kinzel O. Llauger-Bufi L. Pescatore G, et al. Discovery of a potent class I selective ketone histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in vivo and optimized pharmacokinetic properties. J Med Chem. 2009;52:3453–3456. [PubMed]
50. Zhang L. Fang H. Xu W. Strategies in developing promising histone deacetylase inhibitors. Med Res Rev. 2010;30:585–602. [PubMed]
51. Pontiki E. Hadjipavlou-Litina D. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs). Structure–activity relationships: History and new QSAR perspectives. Med Res Rev. 2012;32:1–165. [PubMed]
52. Addis M. Piredda G. Pirisi A. The use of lamb rennet paste in traditional sheep milk cheese production. Small Ruminant Res. 2008;79:2–10.
53. Santillo A. Albenzio M. Quinto M, et al. Probiotic in lamb rennet paste enhances rennet lipolytic activity, and conjugated linoleic acid and linoleic acid content in pecorino cheese. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:1330–1337. [PubMed]
54. Miller SJ. Cellular and physiological effects of short-chain fatty acids. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2004;4:839–845. [PubMed]
55. Waldecker M. Kautenburger T. Daumann H, et al. Inhibition of histone-deacetylase activity by short-chain fatty acids and some polyphenol metabolites formed in the colon. J Nutr Biochem. 2008;19:587–593. [PubMed]
56. Scharlau D. Borowicki A. Habermann N, et al. Mechanisms of primary cancer prevention by butyrate and other products formed during gut flora-mediated fermentation of dietary fiber. Mutat Res. 2009;682:39–53. [PubMed]
57. Serpa J. Caiado F. Carvalho T, et al. Butyrate-rich colonic microenvironment is a relevant selection factor for metabolically adapted tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39211–39223. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
58. Rajendran P. Williams DE. Ho E, et al. Metabolism as a key to histone deacetylase inhibition. Crit Rev Biochem Mol. 2011;46:181–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Terao Y. Nishida J-I. Horiuchi S, et al. Sodium butyrate induces growth arrest and senescence-like phenotypes in gynecological cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2001;94:257–267. [PubMed]
60. Rodríguez-Paredes M. Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med. 2011;17:330–339. [PubMed]
61. Andriamihaja M. Chaumontet C. Tome D, et al. Butyrate metabolism in human colon carcinoma cells: Implications concerning its growth-inhibitory effect. J Cell Physiol. 2009;218:58–65. [PubMed]
62. Zhang Y. Zhou L. Bao YL, et al. Butyrate induces cell apoptosis through activation of JNK MAP kinase pathway in human colon cancer RKO cells. Chem-Biol Interact. 2010;185:174–181. [PubMed]
63. Crea F. Nobili S. Paolicchi E, et al. Epigenetics and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer: An opportunity for treatment tailoring and novel therapeutic strategies. Drug Resist Updates. 2011;14:280–296. [PubMed]
64. Rawłuszko AA. Sławek S. Gollogly A, et al. Effect of butyrate on aromatase cytochrome P450 levels in HT29, DLD-1 and LoVo colon cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2012;66:77–82. [PubMed]
65. Rahman R. Grundy R. Histone deacetylase inhibition as an anticancer telomerase-targeting strategy. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2765–2774. [PubMed]
66. Liang G. Taranova O. Xia K, et al. Butyrate promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:25516–25521. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
67. Mali P. Chou B-K. Yen J, et al. Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency-associated genes. Stem Cells. 2010;28:713–720. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
68. Zhou M. Li P. Tan L, et al. Differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into hepatocytes induced by a combination of cytokines and sodium butyrate. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109:606–614. [PubMed]
69. Lyssiotis CA. Lairson LL. Boitano AE, et al. Chemical control of stem cell fate and developmental potential. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:200–242. [PubMed]
70. Ariff IM. Mitra A. Anirban Basu A. Epigenetic regulation of self-renewal and fate determination in neural stem cells. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90:529–539. [PubMed]
71. Mali P. Cheng L. Concise review: Human cell engineering: Cellular reprogramming and genome editing. Stem Cells. 2012;30:75–81. [PubMed]
72. Roy M-J. Dionne S. Marx G, et al. In vitro studies on the inhibition of colon cancer by butyrate and carnitine. Nutrition. 2009;25:1193–1201. [PubMed]
73. Blouin J-M. Penot G. Collinet M, et al. Butyrate elicits a metabolic switch in human colon cancer cells by targeting the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:2591–2601. [PubMed]
74. Canani RB. Di Costanzo M. Leone L. The epigenetic effects of butyrate: Potential therapeutic implications for clinical practice. Clin Epigenetics. 2012;4:4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. Guan J-S. Haggarty SJ. Giacometti E, et al. HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature. 2009;459:55–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Kim HJ. Leeds P. Chuang D-M. The HDAC inhibitor, sodium butyrate, stimulates neurogenesis in the ischemic brain. J Neurochem. 2009;110:1226–1240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
77. Best JD. Carey N. Epigenetic therapies for non-oncology indications. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:1008–1014. [PubMed]
78. McGee-Lawrence ME. Westendorf JJ. Histone deacetylases in skeletal development and bone mass maintenance. Gene. 2011;474:1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
79. Sampathkumar S-G. Jones MB. Meledeo MA, et al. Targeting glycosylation pathways and the cell cycle: Sugar-dependent activity of butyrate-carbohydrate cancer prodrugs. Chem Biol. 2006;13:1265–1275. [PubMed]
80. Pajak B. Orzechowski A. Gajkowska B. Molecular basis of sodium butyrate-dependent proapoptotic activity in cancer cells. Adv Med Sci. 2007;52:83–88. [PubMed]
81. Lee S. Park J-R. Seo M-S, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors decrease proliferation potential and multilineage differentiation capability of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2009;42:711–722. [PubMed]
82. Gao Z. Yin J. Zhang J, et al. Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice. Diabetes. 2009;58:1509–1517. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Pace BS. White GL. Dover GJ, et al. Short-chain fatty acid derivatives induce fetal globin expression and erythropoiesis in vivo. Blood. 2002;100:4640–4648. [PubMed]
84. Perrine SP. Fetal globin induction—can it cure β thalassemia? Hematology. 2005;1:38–44. [PubMed]
85. Perrine SP. Mankidy R. Boosalis MS, et al. Erythroid Kruppel-like factor (EKLF) is recruited to the γ-globin gene promoter as a co-activator and is required for γ-globin gene induction by short-chain fatty acid derivatives. Eur J Haematol. 2009;82:466–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
86. Canani RB. Di Costanzo M. Leone L, et al. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1519–1528. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Machado-Vieira R. Ibrahim L. Zarate CA., Jr. Histone deacetylases and mood disorders: Epigenetic programming in gene-environment interactions. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011;17:699–704. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Wang A. Si H. Liu D, et al. Butyrate activates the cAMP-protein kinase A cAMP response element-binding protein signaling pathway in Caco-2 cells. J Nutr. 2012;142:1–6. [PubMed]
89. Witt O. Mönkemeyer S. Rönndahl G, et al. Induction of fetal hemoglobin expression by the histone deacetylase inhibitor apicidin. Blood. 2003;101:2001–2007. [PubMed]
90. Entin-Meer M. Rephaeli A. Yang X, et al. Butyric acid prodrugs are histone deacetylase inhibitors that show antineoplastic activity and radiosensitizing capacity in the treatment of malignant gliomas. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1952–1961. [PubMed]
91. Bohacek R. Boosalis MS. McMartin C, et al. Identification of novel small-molecule inducers of fetal hemoglobin using pharmacophore and ‘PSEUDO’ receptor models. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2006;67:318–328. [PubMed]
92. Riester D. Hildmann C. Schwienhorst A. Histone deacetylase inhibitors—turning epigenic mechanisms of gene regulation into tools of therapeutic intervention in malignant and other diseases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:499–514. [PubMed]
93. Parise RA. Beumera JH. Kangani CO, et al. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric assay for quantitation of the short-chain fatty acid, 2,2-dimethylbutyrate (NSC 741804), in rat plasma. J Chromatogr B. 2008;862:168–174. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Kuroiwa-Trzmielina J. de Conti A. Scolastici C, et al. Chemoprevention of rat hepatocarcinogenesis with histone deacetylase inhibitors: Efficacy of tributyrin, a butyric acid prodrug. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:2520–2527. [PubMed]
95. Ghosh SK. Perrine SP. Williams RM, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are potent inducers of gene expression in latent EBV and sensitize lymphoma cells to nucleoside antiviral agents. Blood. 2012;119:1008–1017. [PubMed]
96. Nudelman A. Gnizi E. Katz Y, et al. Prodrugs of butyric acid. Novel derivatives possessing increased aqueous solubility and potential for treating cancer and blood diseases. Eur J Med. 2001;36:63–74. [PubMed]
97. Kessler-Icekson G. Hochhauser E. Sinai T, et al. A histone deacetylase inhibitory prodrug—butyroyloxymethyl diethyl phosphate—protects the heart and cardiomyocytes against ischemia injury. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2012;45:592–599. [PubMed]
98. Rephaeli A. Entin-Meer M. Angel D, et al. The selectivity and anti-metastatic activity of oral bioavailable butyric acid prodrugs. Invest New Drugs. 2006;24:383–392. [PubMed]
99. Chung MC. Ferreira EI. Santos JL, et al. Prodrugs for the treatment of neglected diseases. Molecules. 2008;13:616–677. [PubMed]
100. Tarasenko N. Nudelman A. Tarasenko I, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: The anticancer, antimetastatic and antiangiogenic activities of AN-7 are superior to those of the clinically tested AN-9 (Pivanex) Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25:703–716. [PubMed]
101. Mai A. Altucci L. Epi-drugs to fight cancer: From chemistry to cancer treatment, the road ahead. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:199–213. [PubMed]
102. Perrine SP. Ginder G. Faller DV, et al. A short-term trial of butyrate to stimulate fetal globin gene expression in the β globin gene disorders. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:81–86. [PubMed]
103. Atweh GF. Dover GJ. Ikuta T, et al. Hematologic responses to pulse butyrate therapy in the beta-hemoglobinopathies. Blood. 1999;93:1790–1797. [PubMed]
104. Perrine SP. Castaneda SA. Chui DH, et al. Fetal globin gene inducers: Novel agents and new potential. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1202:158–164. [PubMed]
105. McMahon L. Tamary H. Askin M, et al. A randomized phase II trial of arginine butyrate with standard local therapy in refractory sickle cell leg ulcers. Br J Haematol. 2010;151:516–524. [PubMed]
106. Bora-Tatar G. Dayangaç-Erden D. Demir AS, et al. Molecular modifications on carboxylic acid derivatives as potent histone deacetylase inhibitors: Activity and docking studies. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:5219–5228. [PubMed]
107. Li G-F. Qian T-L. Li G-S, et al. Sodium valproate inhibits MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell migration by upregulating NM23H1 expression. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11:77–86. [PubMed]
108. Gilbert KM. DeLoose A. Valentine JL, et al. Structure–activity relationship between carboxylic acids and T cell cycle blockade. Life Sci. 2006;78:2159–2165. [PubMed]
109. Boosalis MS. Bandyopadhyay R. Bresnick EH, et al. Short-chain fatty acid derivatives stimulate cell proliferation and induce STAT-5 activation. Blood. 2001;97:3259–3267. [PubMed]
110. Castaneda S. Boosalis MS. Emery D, et al. Enhancement of growth and survival and alterations in Bcl-family proteins in β-thalassemic erythroid progenitors by novel short-chain fatty acid derivatives. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2005;35:217–226. [PubMed]
111. Lu Q. Yang Y-T. Chen C-S, et al. Zn2+-chelating motif-tethered short-chain fatty acids as a novel class of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2004;47:467–474. [PubMed]
112. Lu Q. Wang D-S. Chen C-S, et al. Structure-based optimization of phenylbutyrate-derived histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem. 2005;48:5530–5535. [PubMed]
113. Bieliauskas AV. Weerasinghe SVW. Pflum MKH. Structural requirements of HDAC inhibitors: SAHA analogs functionalized adjacent to the hydroxamic acid. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:2216–2219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
114. Witter DJ. Harrington P. Wilson KJ, et al. Optimization of biaryl selective HDAC1&2 inhibitors (SHI-1:2) Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:726–731. [PubMed]
115. Andrianov V. Gailite V. Lola D, et al. Novel amide derivatives as inhibitors of histone deacetylase: Design, synthesis and SAR. Eur J Med Chem. 2009;44:1067–1085. [PubMed]
116. Martinet N. Bertrand P. Interpreting clinical assays for histone deacetylase inhibitors. Cancer Manage Res. 2011;3:117–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
117. Thangaraju M. Carswell KN. Prasad PD, et al. Colon cancer cells maintain low levels of pyruvate to avoid cell death caused by inhibition of HDAC1/HDAC3. Biochem J. 2009;417:379–389. [PubMed]
118. Steliou K. Perrine SP. Faller DV. Lactic acid in cancer and mitochondrial disease. Drug Dev Res. 2009;70:499–511.
119. Gupta N. Martin PM. Prasad PD, et al. SLC5A8 (SMCT1)-mediated transport of butyrate forms the basis for the tumor suppressive function of the transporter. Life Sci. 2006;78:2419–2425. [PubMed]
120. Ganapathy V. Thangaraju M. Prasad PD. Nutrient transporters in cancer: Relevance to Warburg hypothesis and beyond. Pharmacol Therapeut. 2009;121:29–40. [PubMed]
121. Brown AJ. Jupe S. Briscoe CP. A family of fatty acid binding receptors. DNA Cell Biol. 2005;24:54–61. [PubMed]
122. Aich U. Yarema KJ. Non-natural sugar analogues: Chemical probes for metabolic oligosaccharide engineering. In: Fraser-Reid B, editor; Tatsuta K, editor; Thiem J., editor. Glycoscience. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Germany: 2008. pp. 2133–2190.
123. Zhang H. Ma Y. Sun X-L. Recent developments in carbohydrate-decorated targeted drug/gene delivery. Med Res Rev. 2010;30:270–289. [PubMed]
124. Mertens K. Mees G. Lambert B, et al. In vitro 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose uptake: Practical considerations. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27:183–188. [PubMed]
125. Elmouelhi N. Aich U. Paruchuri VDP, et al. Hexosamine template. A platform for modulating gene expression and for sugar-based drug discovery. J Med Chem. 2009;52:2515–2530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
126. Stallforth P. Lepenies B. Adibekian A, et al. Carbohydrates: A frontier in medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem. 2009;52:5561–5577. [PubMed]
127. Wang Z. Du J. Che P-L, et al. Hexosamine analogs: From metabolic glycoengineering to drug discovery. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009;13:565–572. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
128. Kim EJ. Jones MB. Rhee JK, et al. Establishment of N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) analogue-resistant cell lines as improved hosts for sialic acid engineering applications. Biotechnol Prog. 2004;20:1674–1682. [PubMed]
129. Campbell CT. Sampathkumar S-G. Yarema KJ. Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering: Perspectives, applications, and future directions. Mol Biosyst. 2007;3:187–194. [PubMed]
130. Campbell CT. Aich U. Weier CA, et al. Targeting pro-invasive oncogenes with short chain fatty acid-hexosamine analogues inhibits the mobility of metastatic MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. J Med Chem. 2008;51:8135–8147. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
131. Almaraz RT. Aich U. Khanna HS, et al. Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering with N-acyl functionalized ManNAc analogs: Cytotoxicity, metabolic flux, and glycan-display considerations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:992–1006. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
132. Parameshwaran K. Irwin MH. Steliou K, et al. D-Galactose effectiveness in modeling aging and therapeutic antioxidant treatment in mice. Rejuv Res. 2010;13:729–735. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
133. Parameshwaran K. Irwin MH. Steliou K, et al. Antioxidant protection of rotenone-induced neuromotor decline, ROS generation and cellular stress in mouse brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012;101:487–492. [PubMed]
134. Nałezcz KA. Miecz D. Berezowski V, et al. Carnitine: Transport and physiological functions in the brain. Mol Aspects Med. 2004;25:551–567. [PubMed]
135. Srinivas SR. Prasad PD. Umapathy NS, et al. Transport of butyryl-L-carnitine, a potential prodrug, via the carnitine transporter OCTN2 and the amino acid transporter ATB0,+ Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;293:G1046–G1053. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
136. Gong X-w. Li J-p. Wu J-f, et al. Synthesis of carnitine benzyl esters as prodrugs. J Chem Res. 2008;2008:327–330.
137. Piermatti O. Fringuelli F. Pochini L, et al. Synthesis and characterization of carnitine nitro-derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16:1444–1451. [PubMed]
138. Rosca MG. Lemieux H. Hoppel CL. Mitochondria in the elderly: Is acetylcarnitine a rejuvenator? Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2009;61:1332–1342. [PubMed]
139. Knoop F. Der abbau aromatischer fettsäuren im tierkörper (The degradation of aromatic fatty acids in the animal body) Beitr Chem Physiol Pathol. 1904;6:150–162.
140. Houten SM. Wanders RJA. A general introduction to the biochemistry of mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33:469–477. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
141. Bieber LL. Carnitine. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:261–283. [PubMed]
142. Bieber LL. Emaus R. Valkner K, et al. Possible functions of short-chain and medium-chain carnitine acyltransferases. Fed Proc. 1982;41:2858–2862. [PubMed]

Articles from BioResearch Open Access are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.