Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2013; 8(1): e54108.
Published online 2013 January 24. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0054108
PMCID: PMC3554713

The Functional DRD3 Ser9Gly Polymorphism (rs6280) Is Pleiotropic, Affecting Reward as Well as Movement

Andreas Reif, Editor


Abnormalities of motivation and behavior in the context of reward are a fundamental component of addiction and mood disorders. Here we test the effect of a functional missense mutation in the dopamine 3 receptor (DRD3) gene (ser9gly, rs6280) on reward-associated dopamine (DA) release in the striatum. Twenty-six healthy controls (HCs) and 10 unmedicated subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD) completed two positron emission tomography (PET) scans with [11C]raclopride using the bolus plus constant infusion method. On one occasion subjects completed a sensorimotor task (control condition) and on another occasion subjects completed a gambling task (reward condition). A linear regression analysis controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, and self-reported anhedonia indicated that during receipt of unpredictable monetary reward the glycine allele was associated with a greater reduction in D2/3 receptor binding (i.e., increased reward-related DA release) in the middle (anterior) caudate (p<0.01) and the ventral striatum (p<0.05). The possible functional effect of the ser9gly polymorphism on DA release is consistent with previous work demonstrating that the glycine allele yields D3 autoreceptors that have a higher affinity for DA and display more robust intracellular signaling. Preclinical evidence indicates that chronic stress and aversive stimulation induce activation of the DA system, raising the possibility that the glycine allele, by virtue of its facilitatory effect on striatal DA release, increases susceptibility to hyperdopaminergic responses that have previously been associated with stress, addiction, and psychosis.


Abnormalities of motivation and behavior in the context of reward are a key component of addiction and mood disorders. While the neurophysiological structure of the “reward circuit” has been well delineated (figure 1), the genetic contribution to striatal dopaminergic signaling remains poorly understood. Using positron emission tomography (PET), a number of groups have reported associations between functional variants in the DRD2 gene and the binding potential (BP) of [11C]raclopride, a D2/3 antagonist [1], [2], [3], [4]. The BP parameter reflects the density x the affinity of D2/3 receptors in the brain. These imaging data are potentially important because genetically-driven differences in dopamine (DA) receptor function may influence the changes in dopaminergic signaling that modulate emotional, motivational and stress responses.

Figure 1
The phasic burst-firing activity of DA neurons in the VTA is induced by direct excitatory input from the PPTg to the VTA.

In contrast, the impact of genetic variation in the DRD3 gene on measures of DA receptor binding or function has received little attention in the PET literature. Unlike D1 and D2 receptors, the D3 receptor is largely expressed on the dopaminergic neurons of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) [5] where it acts as a DA release-regulating autoreceptor (the D3 receptor has also been shown to act as a heteroreceptor) [6]. Other regions in which the D3 receptor is expressed include the substantia nigra, hypothalamus, globus pallidus, and thalamus [7], [8]. In preclinical studies, blockade of the D3 receptor has been reported to reduce relapse after the presentation of conditioned alcohol and nicotine-associated cues [9], [10] and to prevent the stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior [11]. In humans, postmortem work showed that the density of D3 receptors was elevated in cocaine abusers [12] while polymorphisms of DRD3 gene have been associated with smoking behavior [13], [14], nicotine dependence [15], and alcohol craving [16]. Polymorphisms of the DRD3 gene also have been implicated in increasing the risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) [17], [18].

Stress-induced anhedonia, the failure to experience pleasure in appropriate contexts, has been associated with decreased responsiveness of the D3 receptor in the NAc in animal models; conversely multiple classes of antidepressant medications as well as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) enhance D3 receptor responsiveness [19], [20], [21].. Consistent with these data, genetic variants in the DRD3 gene were associated with differential responsiveness to ECT in humans with major depressive disorder (MDD) [22]. Notably, pramipexole, a dopamine receptor agonist with high selectivity for the D2 dopamine receptor family and preferential affinity for the D3 receptor subtype, has shown antidepressant effects in humans [23], [24] and has been reported to augment tonic DA release and to alter DA neuronal firing activity in rodents [25].

Pharmacogenetic studies have reported that a functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the DRD3 gene (ser9gly) influenced antidepressant response in bipolar disorder patients treated with a combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine [26] as well as response to paroxetine in patients with MDD [27]. The ser9gly polymorphism has also been associated with depression arising in the context of dementia [28] as well as primary MDD [17], [29], [30].

A potentially informative measure of the effect of DRD3 polymorphisms on central dopaminergic function is afforded by the sensitivity of [11C]raclopride binding to endogenous DA release [31], given the prominent role of the D3 receptor in regulating DA release in the ventral striatum [6]. This PET-[11C]raclopride technique thus allows exploration of the effects of genetic variation on the amount of DA released under conditions associated with increased phasic release of DA, such as during receipt of unpredicted reward [32]. Since DA is released in the NAc in response to unpredicted reward [33], the degree of displacement of [11C]raclopride by the increase in intrasynaptic DA concentrations during reward would then be evident by changes in the radioligand binding to either D2 or D3 receptors [34], [35].

Notably, the application of the PET-[11C]raclopride imaging to measure the degree of DA release during reward provides an experimental paradigm that is sensitive to potential functional effects of genetic variation in the D3 receptor, despite the fact that at baseline, the [11C]raclopride signal is dominated by the D2 receptor. [11C]Raclopride shows not only a modestly greater affinity for the D2 receptor compared with the D3 receptor [36], but relative to the D3 receptor, the density of the D2 receptor is approximately 2-fold greater in the NAc and 4-fold greater in the caudate at postmortem [37]. More recent in vivo studies using [11C]-(+)-PHNO, a radioligand that binds preferentially to the D3 receptor, have indicated that in the absence of reward, the D3 receptor accounts for less than 10% of the signal in the striatum and caudate [7], [8]. Thus the D3 receptor binding contributes only a fraction of the baseline [11C]raclopride BP rendering this measure relatively insensitive to genetically-mediated differences in D3 receptor binding (which would likely be masked by noise introduced by variations in D2 receptor phenotype).

In healthy controls (HC), we previously assessed the magnitude of reward-associated DA release with PET by measuring differences in D2/D3 receptor BPND (ΔBPND) for [11C]raclopride between an unpredictable monetary reward condition and a sensorimotor control condition [38]. A decrease in BPND, indicative of increased endogenous DA release, was observed in the ventral striatum and left middle caudate region-of-interest (anterior caudate head) regions-of-interest in the reward versus the control condition [38]. We also found a significant reduction in [11C]raclopride BPND in depressed patients versus HCs in the anteroventral striatum (unpublished data). Here we tested the effect of a functional missense mutation in the DRD3 gene (ser9gly, rs6280) on ΔBPND in the caudate and striatum in healthy individuals and MDD patients who completed PET scanning with [11C]raclopride.

Patients and Methods

Subject Data

Subjects provided written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the study procedures and risks, as approved by the NIMH IRB. Twenty-six right-handed HCs (15 women; mean age 34.4±8.3) and 10 currently depressed, unmedicated patients with MDD (8 women; mean age 38.2±11.3) participated in the study (table 1). Handedness was assessed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. A medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing (including drug screening), T1-weighted MRI, and both structured (Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR) and an unstructured (with a psychiatrist) psychiatric interviews were obtained on all participants. Anhedonic symptoms were rated using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS).

Table 1
Demographic and Clinical Data for MDD and HC Groups (A) and Total Sample Stratified by Genotype (B).

Volunteers were excluded if they had taken antidepressant medications or other drugs likely to affect cerebral physiology, monoaminergic neurotransmitter function, or vascular function within 3 weeks of the scan (8 weeks for fluoxetine). Other exclusion criteria included having: a major medical or neurological disorder; a history of psychosis; illicit drug use or alcohol abuse within one year of the scan; lifetime history of alcohol or drug dependence; lifetime exposure to stimulant drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines) tobacco use within 1 year of the scan; lifetime history of pathological gambling behavior as assessed with the lie/bet screen and South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), electrolyte disturbance, anemia, positive drug test or HIV screen on laboratory testing, IQ<85; current pregnancy or breast feeding, and general MRI exclusions. Additional exclusions applied to the healthy group included having met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a current or past psychiatric disorder or having a first degree relative with a mood or anxiety disorder as established using the Family Interview for Genetic Studies (FIGS).

PET Imaging

The Sensorimotor and Gambling (Slot Machine) Tasks

Methodological details can be found in [38]. Briefly, the slot machine task involved two conditions, each consisting of 180 trials, each of average duration 8 sec. In the monetary-reward condition subjects received financial rewards unpredictably, in a pseudo-randomized order with an average of one reward per four trials. In the sensorimotor control condition subjects performed the same task without receiving rewards, to control for motor activation or other nonspecific aspects of task-performance (figure S1).

During scanning subjects initially rested for 20 min in order to allow [11C]raclopride to approach equilibrium (previously validated by [39], [40]), and thereafter they performed the sensorimotor control task for approximately 24 min. Beginning 50 min after the start of the [11C]raclopride infusion, subjects performed the monetary reward condition for approximately 24 min. This timing allowed the distribution of [11C]raclopride to come into equilibrium for each of the two task conditions. During the 24 min epochs that corresponded to each task condition, subjects alternated between two-min periods in which they actively performed the task and one-min periods when they rested to minimize fatigue. Each subject won a total of $33 during the rewarded condition.

Image Acquisition

PET scans were acquired using a GE-Advance scanner in 3D-mode (3D resolution = 6 mm full-width at half-maximum). The data were reconstructed using a Hanning-filter and Gaussian-fit scatter-correction method. A transmission scan was acquired using rotating 68Ge/68Ga rods to perform attenuation-correction of the emission scans. The [11C]raclopride (20 mCi) was administered as an initial bolus over 60 seconds followed by a maintenance infusion over the remainder of the scanning session using a computer-controlled pump. Dynamic emission scanning (27 frames) was initiated with injection of the [11C]raclopride bolus. MRI images were acquired on a General Electric 3.0 Tesla scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), using T1 weighted sequences to provide an anatomical framework for image analysis (in-plane resolution: 0.86 mm, slice thickness: 1.2 mm).

PET Image Analysis

Mean tissue radioactivity concentrations from the baseline and reward images were extracted using MRI-based regions-of-interest (ROI), defined on a template MRI image using MEDx software in the anteroventral striatum, middle caudate, and cerebellum after Martin-Soelch et al. (2011). Each individual's MRI was registered to a template brain and the ROIs were repositioned as needed to accommodate individual differences in anatomy. The anatomical accuracy of each set of individual ROI was verified by a neuroscientist familiar with striatal anatomy (WCD). These ROIs then were back-transformed into the subject's native MRI space and applied to the co-registered PET images.

Decay-corrected, tissue radioactivity concentrations (C) were obtained from each ROI using a calibrated phantom standard to convert tomographic counts to Bq/ml. Mean radioactivity in the reference region (cerebellum; C′) was used to factor out the effects of free and non-specifically bound [11C]raclopride. The percent change in [11C]raclopride binding was computed as the difference in BPND (C/C′-1 for each ROI) between baseline and reward images.

Selection of Regions of Interest

The ventral striatum and middle caudate were chosen as ROIs on the basis of our previously published imaging findings regarding the striatal subregions where [11C]raclopride binding changed in response to unpredicted monetary reward [38]. The ROIs in [38] were defined using neuroanatomical landmarks on the co-registered MRI scan after the method described by [41]. In primates the cells with histochemical and connectional features of the NAc shell implicated in reward learning are scattered through the accumbens area, ventromedial caudate, and anteroventral putamen [42], and previous PET studies of amphetamine-induced DA release showed that euphoria correlated with DA release in the anteroventral striatum and ventral putamen [41], [43]. The middle caudate consists of the central portion of the anterior caudate head, which receives anatomical projections from the orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortical regions implicated in reward processing [44].


Samples were genotyped for the rs6280 polymorphism using the Illumina GoldenGate platform [45]. The array covers 130 candidate genes for alcoholism, other addictions, and mood and anxiety disorders. The average call rate of this platform is 98.3% and the replication rate, 99.7%. The array also allows for control of population stratification through the inclusion of 186 ancestry informative markers (AIMs). The AIMs panel identifies six distinct groups from the global population, based upon geographic relationships: Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia, Far East Asia, Oceania, and the Americas.

Statistical Analysis

To test whether ethnicity predicted D3 [11C]raclopride binding, we used African and European ancestry, defined by genetically informative markers, as predictors of [11C]raclopride binding in separate regression models. There was no effect of either African or European ancestry on baseline BPND of ventral striatum and middle caudate as well as Δ BPND of the ventral striatum and middle caudate (table S1). The majority of the participants were Caucasian or African American and thus the ancestry categories, Middle-Eastern, Asian, Far East Asian, Oceania, and America were not evaluated as predictors of raclopride binding because these factors were quantitatively negligible across the sample.

Imaging genetics data were analyzed with a 2-step forced linear regression. The following predictor variables were entered into the model: age, sex, diagnosis, and SHAPS score (step 1) and ser9gly genotype (ser/ser vs ser/gly vs gly/gly) (step 2). Baseline BPND of ventral striatum and middle caudate as well as Δ BPND of the ventral striatum and middle caudate constituted the dependent variables.

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was tested using Haploview [46]. Thirteen subjects were homozygous for the serine allele, 11 subjects were heterozygotes, and 12 subjects were homozygous for glycine.


The ser9gly SNP was not significantly associated with [11C]raclopride binding in the ventral striatum or middle caudate at baseline (table 2). However, a linear regression analysis controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, and self-reported anhedonia indicated that during receipt of unpredictable monetary reward the glycine allele was associated with a greater reduction in D2/3 receptor binding (i.e. increased reward-related DA release) in the middle caudate (r2 explained = 0.24, β-weight = 0.5, t = 3.3, p = 0.003) and the ventral striatum (r2 explained = 0.14; β-weight = 0.4, t = 2.3, p = 0.027) (fig. 2, table 2). A similar, but not statistically significant pattern of findings was observed when the MDD group was considered separately from the HC group (figure, S2).

Figure 2
Scatterplots of the percent change in D2/D3 receptor binding in the reward versus baseline condition for the middle caudate and the ventral striatum.
Table 2
Linear Regression Showing Effects of Ser9Gly on Raclopride Binding and Anhedonia Scores.

The ser9gly polymorphism was not in HWE (p = 0.0346) most likely because of the small sample size. Although ethnic stratification is also a possible cause of the divergence of the Ser9Gly polymorphism from HWE, [11C]raclopride binding was not affected by ethnic origin (table S1) suggesting that our results are not confounded by population admixture.


A potential neurobiological mechanism of ser9gly DA signaling modulation

Our finding that the glycine allele is associated with greater reward-related DA release is potentially consistent with an in vitro study showing that the glycine allele yields D3 autoreceptors that have a higher affinity for DA in both G-protein-coupled and uncoupled receptor states and show more robust cAMP and MAPK signaling [47].

Electrophysiology studies demonstrate that DA neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are either inactive, display irregular tonic-firing, or show phasic burst-firing patterns. In response to unpredicted reward the population of DA neurons engaged in burst-firing increases, although only those DA neurons that had been active prior to stimulation are able to burst-fire in response to excitatory afferent input [48]. The D3 receptor is densely distributed in the shell region of the NAc where it predominantly acts as a presynaptic autoreceptor that inhibits DA release. The higher affinity of the glycine D3 autoreceptor would be expected to decrease the extrasynaptic DA concentration under conditions of tonic DA release, potentially diminishing the inhibitory tone on the amount of DA released per action potential during burst firing, and thereby enabling an increase in the efficacy with which burst-firing releases DA (i.e., more neurotransmitter released per action potential) [49].

The higher affinity of the glycine autoreceptor may also predispose to elevated phasic DA signaling – i.e. greater reward-associated DA release – via a second mechanism. In rodents the tonic firing activity of VTA DA neurons is regulated by antagonistically-acting afferent projections to the NAc from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and ventral subiculum (vSub) (figure 1). D2/3 receptor stimulation selectively inhibits mPFC inputs to the NAc while D1 receptor agonists increase NAc activity via the vSub [48]. More specifically, excitatory projections from the vSub release inactive DA neurons from inhibition, by stimulating the inhibitory projection from the NAc to the ventral pallidum, thereby increasing the pool of DA neurons available for burst-firing [48]. The D1 and D3 receptors form dimers in the limbic and associative striatum allowing for synergistic interaction [50], such that higher affinity D3 receptors, by augmenting phasic DA release, could theoretically potentiate hippocampal drive and thus increase the population of DA neurons entering a burst-firing pattern in response to rewarding stimuli. One would therefore expect a D3 receptor with higher affinity for DA to result in greater DA release during phasic burst-firing.

Potential clinical implications

Depression and/or anhedonia has been shown to be associated with a reduced striatal response to reward [reviewed in [44], [51]]. These data are primarily derived from hemodynamic imaging methods, especially functional MRI (fMRI). The BOLD fMRI signal reflects the corresponding change in regional cerebral blood flow associated with synaptic terminal field metabolic activity and is dominated by glutamatergic transmission, with a relatively smaller component attributable to GABAergic transmission [52]. In contrast, the proportion of the BOLD signal that reflects a direct contribution of terminal field metabolic activity of monoaminergic (i.e., DA) neurons is negligible [52]. Within the striatum many of the DA projections synapse directly on the axon terminals of glutamatergic neurons, and DA release acts to inhibit glutamate release from the afferent excitatory projections [53], [54], Thus an increase in striatal DA signaling could potentially account for the reduction in the BOLD striatal response to reward observed in the ventral striatum in depressed MDD subjects. These data raise the possibility that the glycine allele, which is associated with increased reward-associated DA release, predisposes to the development of mood disorders. Indeed we found that among the MDD patients glycine allele carriers were more anhedonic (measured with the Chapman Social Anhedonia Scale) than serine/serine homozygotes (data not shown). This association between the glycine allele and anhedonia is potentially consistent with preclinical data that indicate that chronic stress and aversive stimulation induce a pronounced activation of the DA system both electrophysiologically (number of DA neurons firing spontaneously) and behaviorally (response to psychostimulants), driven by hyperactivity within the ventral hippocampus [55].

Theoretically, the glycine allele-associated increase in phasic DA signaling may also contribute to the development of addiction disorders. Pharmacological agents that induce feelings of pleasure are known to stimulate DA release in the ventral striatum (reviewed in [56]). In addition, as discussed in Joutsa et al. [57], the binding of [11C]raclopride is sensitive to changes in striatal DA concentration during receipt of non-pharmacological rewards such as a video game [58], large monetary wins versus large monetary losses [59] and the monetary incentive delay task [60]. Notably, in a study of pathological gamblers and healthy controls who completed 3 PET scans with [11C]raclopride while gambling with a slot machine, the severity of addiction to gambling was positively associated with the degree of DA release in the basal ganglia during gambling [57]. Consistent with these results, highly impulsive individuals, who are thought to be vulnerable to developing addiction disorders, were shown to have diminished availability of striatal D2/3 autoreceptors, potentially predisposing them to a greater phasic DA response [61].

In preclinical models of substance abuse, stress-induced elevations in glucocorticoids result in an increased response to psychostimulants while administration of glucocorticoid antagonists or adrenalectomy attenuates self-administration of psychostimulants [62], [63]. In healthy humans, cortisol levels were found to be positively correlated with amphetamine-induced DA release measured with [11C]raclopride in the ventral striatum and the dorsal putamen [64]. These data, taken together with the findings presented here, thus suggest the hypothesis that the susceptibility for developing hyperdopaminergic responses to stress in carriers of the glycine allele may be accentuated in individuals with hypercortisolemia.

Potential treatment implications

The important role of DA signaling in mood disorders is congruent with the fact that pramipexole, a medication with antidepressant properties that selectively binds to the D3 receptor, has been reported to augment tonic DA release and to alter the sensitivity of D3 autoreceptors in rodents [25]. Interestingly, Liu et al. [65] reported that Parkinson's disease patients homozygous for the serine allele had a 60% response rate to pramipexole compared to only a 13% response rate in glycine allele carriers. The effect of ser9gly on pramipexole response in mood disorders is unknown but merits investigation.

Additional comments

The ser9gly variant appears to be pleiotropic and is a well established risk factor for movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia [66], [67] and essential tremor [47], [68]. It has not only been implicated in mood disorders and addiction, but personality traits [69], schizophrenia [70], [71], cognition [72], autism [73], obsessive compulsive disorder [74], and response to clozapine [75], [76] in the context of psychosis. Conceivably, the ser9gly polymorphism is capable of modulating a variety of functions and circuits in which the D3 receptor plays an integral role, perhaps explaining evidence for a recent positive selection sweep in favor of the ser9 allele in European [70] and east Asian populations [71].

The wide range of phenotypes implicated in these genetic association studies together with our results, which are suggestive of a large effect size for the ser9gly variant, raise the question of why the evidence for the D3 receptor involvement in reward and depression-like behavior has not been more robust in the preclinical literature. One possibility is that in contrast to monkeys and primates, which carry the gly9 allele, there is no equivalent polymorphism in mice or rats (figure S3). A D3 receptor knockout may not be adequate to model the change in D3 receptor function associated with the serine-glycine substitution. However, future studies with a gly9 knock-in mouse or rat may provide valuable insight into the role of the D3 receptor in addiction, mood disorders, and psychosis.

One weakness of our study is the modest sample size, which may have led to type I or II error. Although large sample sizes are uncommon in PET studies because of cost and radiation exposure, PET has an advantage over magnetic resonance imaging because it allows a particular molecular target to be assayed directly. Thus it is likely that true signals can be detected with relatively small sample sizes. For example, in a sample of HCs (n = 25) and patients with BD (n = 16) and MDD (n = 17), we previously found a significant association between a non-synonymous polymorphism in the galactose mutarotase gene and serotonin transporter BP in the context of a genome-wide association study [77]. Nevertheless, interactions between ser9gly and functional polymorphisms in DRD2 (C957T and rs1076560), which have been previously associated with D2/3 receptor binding at rest [2], [3], would be interesting to examine in a larger sample.

The order of tasks (sensorimotor and reward task) was not counterbalanced because the PET-[11C]raclopride B/I approach permits imaging in only two conditions per scan session and a behavioral reward-induced increase in DA release that displaces [11C]raclopride can persist for 45 minutes. Thus the task order was fixed so that the unpredicted reward condition, which we expected to increase phasic DA release, always followed the sensorimotor baseline task. Nevertheless, order effects were unlikely to have affected the assessments of DA release induced by the unpredicted reward task because the [11C]raclopride BP obtained during the sensorimotor control task did not differ significantly across genotypes. Future studies potentially may explore the issue of order effects by including a second scan session in which the BP obtained during the sensorimotor control task is compared to the BP obtained during a resting baseline condition (i.e., such a design can address order effects by counterbalancing the order of the session comprised of the resting baseline and sensorimotor task with the session comprised of the sensorimotor task and unpredicted reward task).

Another limitation of our paper concerns the limited temporal resolution of PET, which does not allow a distinction to be made between the effect of the ser9gly DRD3 SNP on DA release associated with anticipation of reward versus DA release associated with receipt of reward.

Future multi-modal imaging studies that combine functional MRI (fMRI) and [11C]raclopride PET data may provide further insights into the role of the ser9gly polymorphism in modulating reward-associated DA-release. A number of studies have successfully applied multi-modal imaging in order to examine the relationship between serotonergic function [78], [79] or dopamine storage capacity [80] and the hemodynamic response to affective stimuli in regions such as the amygdala. Conceivably, a gambling task similar to the one used in this study could be implemented in a cohort of subjects who complete both [11C]raclopride PET and fMRI. It may also be important to examine the effect of the ser9gly SNP on baseline D3 receptor binding using the selective D3 ligand, [11C]-(+)-PHNO.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that the DRD3 ser9gly variant influences in vivo DA release in the context of unpredicted reward, a finding with potentially important implications for the pathophysiology and treatment of addiction and mood disorders.

Supporting Information

Table S1

Linear Regression Showing Effects of Genetically-Defined African and European Ancestry on Raclopride Binding.


Figure S1

During each trial, subjects were presented four distinct pictures (apple, grape, cherry, bell) presented in a “slot-machine” motif. (Adapted from Martin-Soelch et al. 2012). Subjects were asked to choose one of the four with a button press on a four-button response box. This response was followed by a 500 msec delay. In the rewarded trials a one-dollar bill appeared for 1,000 msec and subjects heard the sound of an opening cash-register door. These monetary gains were provided in a pseudo-randomized order with an average of one reward every fourth trial. In the sensorimotor control trials, subjects instead were presented with a meaningless symbol accompanied by a clicking sound on every fourth trial. After being made aware of the trial outcome, subjects were presented their running total of earnings for 1,000 msec. Displaying the actual balance account prevented rapid discounting of the rewards presented. At the end of each trial subjects viewed a blank screen for 1,000 msec. During the reward task subjects were unaware of which trial or picture would lead to the receipt of a reward, except that the same picture could not provide a reward in two consecutive trials. Subjects thus were instructed not to select the same picture more than twice in a row.


Figure S2

The figure shows the distribution of the percentage change in D2/3 receptor binding stratified according to genotype. Figure A illustrates the change in D2/3 receptor binding in the middle caudate in the healthy subjects. Figure B shows the change in D2/3 receptor binding in the middle caudate in the MDD subjects. Figure C illustrates the change in D2/3 receptor binding in the ventral striatum in healthy subjects. Figure D shows the change in D2/3 receptor binding in the ventral striatum in MDD patients.


Figure S3

The figures illustrate the position of the rs6280 SNP in the DRD3 gene (top) and the conservation among species of the amino acid at residue 9, highlighted within the red box (bottom). Mice have a serine allele at residue 9, while rats carry a threonine allele. The glycine allele is present in the other species listed in the figure, including humans. The data were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (


Funding Statement

This research was funded by the intramural program at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Drs. Savitz and Drevets also received support from The William K. Warren Foundation. The Foundation played no role in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Pohjalainen T, Rinne JO, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Anttila K, et al. (1998) The A1 allele of the human D2 dopamine receptor gene predicts low D2 receptor availability in healthy volunteers. Molecular psychiatry 3: 256–260 [PubMed]
2. Hirvonen M, Laakso A, Nagren K, Rinne JO, Pohjalainen T, et al. (2004) C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene affects striatal DRD2 availability in vivo. Mol Psychiatry 9: 1060–1061 [PubMed]
3. Sambataro F, Fazio L, Taurisano P, Gelao B, Porcelli A, et al. (2011) DRD2 Genotype-Based Variation of Default Mode Network Activity and of Its Relationship with Striatal DAT Binding. Schizophr Bull 391: 206–216 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Pecina M, Mickey BJ, Love T, Wang H, Langenecker SA, et al. (2012) DRD2 polymorphisms modulate reward and emotion processing, dopamine neurotransmission and openness to experience. Cortex doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.01.010 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Bouthenet ML, Souil E, Martres MP, Sokoloff P, Giros B, et al. (1991) Localization of dopamine D3 receptor mRNA in the rat brain using in situ hybridization histochemistry: comparison with dopamine D2 receptor mRNA. Brain research 564: 203–219 [PubMed]
6. Diaz J, Pilon C, Le Foll B, Gros C, Triller A, et al. (2000) Dopamine D3 receptors expressed by all mesencephalic dopamine neurons. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20: 8677–8684 [PubMed]
7. Rabiner EA, Slifstein M, Nobrega J, Plisson C, Huiban M, et al. (2009) In vivo quantification of regional dopamine-D3 receptor binding potential of (+)-PHNO: Studies in non-human primates and transgenic mice. Synapse 63: 782–793 [PubMed]
8. Tziortzi AC, Searle GE, Tzimopoulou S, Salinas C, Beaver JD, et al. (2011) Imaging dopamine receptors in humans with [11C]-(+)-PHNO: dissection of D3 signal and anatomy. Neuroimage 54: 264–277 [PubMed]
9. Khaled MA, Farid Araki K, Li B, Coen KM, Marinelli PW, et al. (2010) The selective dopamine D3 receptor antagonist SB 277011-A, but not the partial agonist BP 897, blocks cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology/official scientific journal of the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologicum 13: 181–190 [PubMed]
10. Vengeliene V, Leonardi-Essmann F, Perreau-Lenz S, Gebicke-Haerter P, Drescher K, et al. (2006) The dopamine D3 receptor plays an essential role in alcohol-seeking and relapse. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 20: 2223–2233 [PubMed]
11. Xi ZX, Gilbert J, Campos AC, Kline N, Ashby CR Jr, et al. (2004) Blockade of mesolimbic dopamine D3 receptors inhibits stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology 176: 57–65 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Segal DM, Moraes CT, Mash DC (1997) Up-regulation of D3 dopamine receptor mRNA in the nucleus accumbens of human cocaine fatalities. Brain research Molecular brain research 45: 335–339 [PubMed]
13. Vandenbergh DJ, O'Connor RJ, Grant MD, Jefferson AL, Vogler GP, et al. (2007) Dopamine receptor genes (DRD2, DRD3 and DRD4) and gene-gene interactions associated with smoking-related behaviors. Addict Biol 12: 106–116 [PubMed]
14. Novak G, LeBlanc M, Zai C, Shaikh S, Renou J, et al. (2010) Association of polymorphisms in the BDNF, DRD1 and DRD3 genes with tobacco smoking in schizophrenia. Annals of human genetics 74: 291–298 [PubMed]
15. Wei J, Chu C, Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang Q, et al. (2012) Association study of 45 candidate genes in nicotine dependence in Han Chinese. Addictive behaviors 37: 622–626 [PubMed]
16. Agrawal A, Wetherill L, Bucholz KK, Kramer J, Kuperman S, et al. (2012) Genetic influences on craving for alcohol. Addictive behaviors 382: 1501–1508 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Schosser A, Gaysina D, Cohen-Woods S, Domenici E, Perry J, et al. (2011) A follow-up case-control association study of tractable (druggable) genes in recurrent major depression. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 156B: 640–650 [PubMed]
18. Dikeos DG, Papadimitriou GN, Avramopoulos D, Karadima G, Daskalopoulou EG, et al. (1999) Association between the dopamine D3 receptor gene locus (DRD3) and unipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Genet 9: 189–195 [PubMed]
19. Maj J, Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M, Rogoz R, Rogoz Z (1998) Effect of antidepressant drugs administered repeatedly on the dopamine D3 receptors in the rat brain. European journal of pharmacology 351: 31–37 [PubMed]
20. Lammers CH, Diaz J, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P (2000) Selective increase of dopamine D3 receptor gene expression as a common effect of chronic antidepressant treatments. Molecular psychiatry 5: 378–388 [PubMed]
21. Papp M, Klimek V, Willner P (1994) Parallel changes in dopamine D2 receptor binding in limbic forebrain associated with chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia and its reversal by imipramine. Psychopharmacology 115: 441–446 [PubMed]
22. Dannlowski U, Domschke K, Birosova E, Lawford B, Young R, et al. (2011) Dopamine D3 receptor gene variation: impact on electroconvulsive therapy response and ventral striatum responsiveness in depression. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology/official scientific journal of the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologicum 1–17 [PubMed]
23. Aiken CB (2007) Pramipexole in psychiatry: a systematic review of the literature. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 68: 1230–1236 [PubMed]
24. Zarate CA Jr, Payne JL, Singh J, Quiroz JA, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. (2004) Pramipexole for bipolar II depression: a placebo-controlled proof of concept study. Biological psychiatry 56: 54–60 [PubMed]
25. Chernoloz O, El Mansari M, Blier P (2009) Sustained administration of pramipexole modifies the spontaneous firing of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin neurons in the rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 651–661 [PubMed]
26. Perlis RH, Adams DH, Fijal B, Sutton VK, Farmen M, et al. (2010) Genetic association study of treatment response with olanzapine/fluoxetine combination or lamotrigine in bipolar I depression. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 71: 599–605 [PubMed]
27. Tsuchimine S, Yasui-Furukori N, Nakagami T, Sato Y, Kaneko S (2012) DRD3, but Not BDNF, Genotype Affects Treatment Response to Paroxetine in Major Depressive Disorder: A Preliminary Study. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 32: 724–726 [PubMed]
28. Proitsi P, Lupton MK, Reeves SJ, Hamilton G, Archer N, et al. (2012) Association of serotonin and dopamine gene pathways with behavioral subphenotypes in dementia. Neurobiology of aging 33: 791–803 [PubMed]
29. Dikeos DG, Papadimitriou GN, Avramopoulos D, Karadima G, Daskalopoulou EG, et al. (1999) Association between the dopamine D3 receptor gene locus (DRD3) and unipolar affective disorder. Psychiatric genetics 9: 189–195 [PubMed]
30. Henderson AS, Korten AE, Jorm AF, Jacomb PA, Christensen H, et al. (2000) COMT and DRD3 polymorphisms, environmental exposures, and personality traits related to common mental disorders. American journal of medical genetics 96: 102–107 [PubMed]
31. Laruelle M (2000) Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding competition techniques: a critical review. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 20: 423–451 [PubMed]
32. Goto Y, Grace AA (2008) Limbic and cortical information processing in the nucleus accumbens. Trends Neurosci 31: 552–558 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Schultz W (2002) Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 36: 241–263 [PubMed]
34. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Logan J, Schlyer D, et al. (1994) Imaging endogenous dopamine competition with [11C]raclopride in the human brain. Synapse 16: 255–262 [PubMed]
35. Zald DH, Boileau I, El-Dearedy W, Gunn R, McGlone F, et al. (2004) Dopamine transmission in the human striatum during monetary reward tasks. J Neurosci 24: 4105–4112 [PubMed]
36. Malmberg A, Nordvall G, Johansson AM, Mohell N, Hacksell U (1994) Molecular basis for the binding of 2-aminotetralins to human dopamine D2A and D3 receptors. Molecular pharmacology 46: 299–312 [PubMed]
37. Gurevich EV, Joyce JN (1999) Distribution of dopamine D3 receptor expressing neurons in the human forebrain: comparison with D2 receptor expressing neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 60–80 [PubMed]
38. Martin-Soelch C, Szczepanik J, Nugent A, Barhaghi K, Rallis D, et al. (2011) Lateralization and gender differences in the dopaminergic response to unpredictable reward in the human ventral striatum. Eur J Neurosci 33: 1706–1715 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Lassen NA (1992) Neuroreceptor quantitation in vivo by the steady-state principle using constant infusion or bolus injection of radioactive tracers. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 12: 709–716 [PubMed]
40. Carson RE, Breier A, de Bartolomeis A, Saunders RC, Su TP, et al. (1997) Quantification of amphetamine-induced changes in [11C]raclopride binding with continuous infusion. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 17: 437–447 [PubMed]
41. Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, Kupfer DJ, Kinahan PE, et al. (2001) Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol Psychiatry 49: 81–96 [PubMed]
42. Heimer L, Alheid GF (1991) Piecing together the puzzle of basal forebrain anatomy. Adv Exp Med Biol 295: 1–42 [PubMed]
43. Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Mawlawi O, Hwang DR, et al. (2003) Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography. Part II: amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the functional subdivisions of the striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 23: 285–300 [PubMed]
44. Haber SN, Knutson B (2010) The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 4–26 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Hodgkinson CA, Yuan Q, Xu K, Shen PH, Heinz E, et al. (2008) Addictions biology: haplotype-based analysis for 130 candidate genes on a single array. Alcohol Alcohol 43: 505–515 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265 [PubMed]
47. Jeanneteau F, Funalot B, Jankovic J, Deng H, Lagarde JP, et al. (2006) A functional variant of the dopamine D3 receptor is associated with risk and age-at-onset of essential tremor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10753–10758 [PubMed]
48. Grace AA, Floresco SB, Goto Y, Lodge DJ (2007) Regulation of firing of dopaminergic neurons and control of goal-directed behaviors. Trends Neurosci 30: 220–227 [PubMed]
49. Maina FK, Mathews TA (2010) A functional fast scan cyclic voltammetry assay to characterize dopamine D2 and D3 autoreceptors in the mouse striatum. ACS Chem Neurosci 1: 450–462 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
50. Ridray S, Griffon N, Mignon V, Souil E, Carboni S, et al. (1998) Coexpression of dopamine D1 and D3 receptors in islands of Calleja and shell of nucleus accumbens of the rat: opposite and synergistic functional interactions. Eur J Neurosci 10: 1676–1686 [PubMed]
51. Bogdan R, Nikolova YS, Pizzagalli DA (2012) Neurogenetics of depression: A focus on reward processing and stress sensitivity. Neurobiology of disease doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2012.05.007 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
52. Shulman RG, Rothman DL, Behar KL, Hyder F (2004) Energetic basis of brain activity: implications for neuroimaging. Trends Neurosci 27: 489–495 [PubMed]
53. Bamford NS, Zhang H, Schmitz Y, Wu NP, Cepeda C, et al. (2004) Heterosynaptic dopamine neurotransmission selects sets of corticostriatal terminals. Neuron 42: 653–663 [PubMed]
54. Rowlands GF, Roberts PJ (1980) Activation of dopamine receptors inhibits calcium-dependent glutamate release from cortico-striatal terminals in vitro. European journal of pharmacology 62: 241–242 [PubMed]
55. Valenti O, Lodge DJ, Grace AA (2011) Aversive stimuli alter ventral tegmental area dopamine neuron activity via a common action in the ventral hippocampus. J Neurosci 31: 4280–4289 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Swanson JM, Telang F (2007) Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Archives of neurology 64: 1575–1579 [PubMed]
57. Joutsa J, Johansson J, Niemela S, Ollikainen A, Hirvonen MM, et al. (2012) Mesolimbic dopamine release is linked to symptom severity in pathological gambling. Neuroimage 60: 1992–1999 [PubMed]
58. Koepp MJ, Gunn RN, Lawrence AD, Cunningham VJ, Dagher A, et al. (1998) Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature 393: 266–268 [PubMed]
59. Pappata S, Dehaene S, Poline JB, Gregoire MC, Jobert A, et al. (2002) In vivo detection of striatal dopamine release during reward: a PET study with [(11)C]raclopride and a single dynamic scan approach. Neuroimage 16: 1015–1027 [PubMed]
60. Schott BH, Minuzzi L, Krebs RM, Elmenhorst D, Lang M, et al. (2008) Mesolimbic functional magnetic resonance imaging activations during reward anticipation correlate with reward-related ventral striatal dopamine release. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 28: 14311–14319 [PubMed]
61. Buckholtz JW, Treadway MT, Cowan RL, Woodward ND, Li R, et al. (2010) Dopaminergic network differences in human impulsivity. Science 329: 532. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Goeders NE, Guerin GF (1996) Effects of surgical and pharmacological adrenalectomy on the initiation and maintenance of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats. Brain research 722: 145–152 [PubMed]
63. Koenig HN, Olive MF (2004) The glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone reduces ethanol intake in rats under limited access conditions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 29: 999–1003 [PubMed]
64. Oswald LM, Wong DF, McCaul M, Zhou Y, Kuwabara H, et al. (2005) Relationships among ventral striatal dopamine release, cortisol secretion, and subjective responses to amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 30: 821–832 [PubMed]
65. Liu YZ, Tang BS, Yan XX, Liu J, Ouyang DS, et al. (2009) Association of the DRD2 and DRD3 polymorphisms with response to pramipexole in Parkinson's disease patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65: 679–683 [PubMed]
66. Sokoloff P, Giros B, Martres MP, Bouthenet ML, Schwartz JC (1990) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dopamine receptor (D3) as a target for neuroleptics. Nature 347: 146–151 [PubMed]
67. Lerer B, Segman RH, Fangerau H, Daly AK, Basile VS, et al. (2002) Pharmacogenetics of tardive dyskinesia: combined analysis of 780 patients supports association with dopamine D3 receptor gene Ser9Gly polymorphism. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 105–119 [PubMed]
68. Deng H, Le W, Jankovic J (2007) Genetics of essential tremor. Brain : a journal of neurology 130: 1456–1464 [PubMed]
69. Jonsson EG, Burgert E, Crocq MA, Gustavsson JP, Forslund K, et al. (2003) Association study between dopamine D3 receptor gene variant and personality traits. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 117: 61–65 [PubMed]
70. Costas J, Carrera N, Dominguez E, Vilella E, Martorell L, et al. (2009) A common haplotype of DRD3 affected by recent positive selection is associated with protection from schizophrenia. Hum Genet 124: 607–613 [PubMed]
71. Zhang F, Fan H, Xu Y, Zhang K, Huang X, et al. (2011) Converging evidence implicates the dopamine D3 receptor gene in vulnerability to schizophrenia. American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics 156B: 613–619 [PubMed]
72. Bombin I, Arango C, Mayoral M, Castro-Fornieles J, Gonzalez-Pinto A, et al. (2008) DRD3, but not COMT or DRD2, genotype affects executive functions in healthy and first-episode psychosis adolescents. American journal of medical genetics Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics 147B: 873–879 [PubMed]
73. Toma C, Hervas A, Balmana N, Salgado M, Maristany M, et al. (2012) Neurotransmitter systems and neurotrophic factors in autism: association study of 37 genes suggests involvement of DDC. The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry doi:10.3109/15622975.2011.602719 [PubMed]
74. Taylor S (2012) Molecular genetics of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comprehensive meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Molecular psychiatry doi:10.1038/mp.2012.76 [PubMed]
75. Jonsson EG, Flyckt L, Burgert E, Crocq MA, Forslund K, et al. (2003) Dopamine D3 receptor gene Ser9Gly variant and schizophrenia: association study and meta-analysis. Psychiatric genetics 13: 1–12 [PubMed]
76. Hwang R, Zai C, Tiwari A, Muller DJ, Arranz MJ, et al. (2010) Effect of dopamine D3 receptor gene polymorphisms and clozapine treatment response: exploratory analysis of nine polymorphisms and meta-analysis of the Ser9Gly variant. Pharmacogenomics J 10: 200–218 [PubMed]
77. Liu X, Cannon DM, Akula N, Moya PR, Knudsen GM, et al. (2011) A non-synonymous polymorphism in galactose mutarotase (GALM) is associated with serotonin transporter binding potential in the human thalamus: results of a genome-wide association study. Molecular psychiatry 16: 584–585 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
78. Fisher PM, Meltzer CC, Ziolko SK, Price JC, Moses-Kolko EL, et al. (2006) Capacity for 5-HT1A-mediated autoregulation predicts amygdala reactivity. Nat Neurosci 9: 1362–1363 [PubMed]
79. Rhodes RA, Murthy NV, Dresner MA, Selvaraj S, Stavrakakis N, et al. (2007) Human 5-HT transporter availability predicts amygdala reactivity in vivo. J Neurosci 27: 9233–9237 [PubMed]
80. Kienast T, Hariri AR, Schlagenhauf F, Wrase J, Sterzer P, et al. (2008) Dopamine in amygdala gates limbic processing of aversive stimuli in humans. Nature neuroscience 11: 1381–1382 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science