Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 January 23.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3552482

Crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel in two potentially inactivated states


In excitable cells, voltage-gated sodium (NaV) channels activate to initiate action potentials and then undergo fast and slow inactivation processes that terminate their ionic conductance1,2. Inactivation is a hallmark of NaV channel function and is critical for control of membrane excitability3, but the structural basis for this process has remained elusive. Here we report crystallographic snapshots of the wild-type NavAb channel from Arcobacter butzleri captured in two potentially inactivated states at 3.2 Å resolution. Compared to previous structures of NavAb S6-cysteine mutants4, the pore-lining S6 helices and the intracellular activation gate have undergone significant rearrangements in which one pair of S6 segments has collapsed toward the central pore axis and the other S6 pair has moved outward to produce a striking dimer-of-dimers configuration. An increase in global structural asymmetry is observed throughout our wild-type NavAb models, reshaping the ion selectivity filter at the extracellular end of the pore, the central cavity and its residues analogous to the mammalian drug receptor site, and the lateral pore fenestrations. The voltage-sensing domains also shift around the perimeter of the pore module in NavAb, and local structural changes identify a conserved interaction network that connects distant molecular determinants involved in NaV channel gating and inactivation. These potential inactivated-state structures provide new insights into NaV channel gating and novel avenues to drug development and therapy for a range of debilitating NaV channelopathies.

Voltage-gated ion channels (VGICs) share a common architecture consisting of a central ion-conducting pore module (PM) and four peripheral voltage-sensing domains (VSDs)4,5. Voltage-gated potassium (KV) and bacterial NaV channels are homotetramers of subunits containing six transmembrane segments (S1–S6)5,6, whereas vertebrate NaV and calcium (CaV) channels contain four linked homologous domains in a single polypeptide7. The S5 and S6 segments of four subunits (or domains) form the PM7. The VSDs (S1–S4) place highly conserved S4 gating charges in the membrane electric field, where depolarization causes their outward movement during channel activation7. S4 movement is coupled through the S4–S5 linker to the intracellular activation gate to open the pore4,5. In mammalian NaV channels, two physically distinct inactivation processes control the activity of NaV channels. Fast inactivation operates on the millisecond time scale and is quickly reversed upon repolarization, permitting NaV channels to be rapidly available for reactivation7. A tethered cytoplasmic inactivation gate connecting the third and fourth homologous domains confers fast inactivation through a hinged-lid mechanism7. Fast inactivation can be removed by intracellular protease treatment8 or mutations of the inactivation gate9 and can be restored by addition of inactivation-gate peptides10. By contrast, slow inactivation develops much more slowly during repetitive firing of action potentials and opposes high-frequency spike generation2,3. Its essential physiological role is highlighted by disease mutations that affect slow-inactivation3 and clinically relevant channel blocking drugs bind to and stabilize slow-inactivated states11,12. In contrast to fast inactivation, the structures and mechanisms involved in slow inactivation of NaV channels remain poorly defined.

Bacterial NaV channels share key physiological properties with their more complex vertebrate descendants, including voltage-dependent activation, inactivation, and pharmacological sensitivity6. However, their simple homotetrameric structure leaves bacterial NaV channels without the fast inactivation gate found in mammalian NaV channels. Therefore, bacterial NaV channels are thought to undergo an inactivation process similar to slow inactivation13. Mutations near the selectivity filter13,14, along the pore-lining S6 helices1517, and within VSDs of bacterial NaV channels have dramatic effects on inactivation, similar to slow inactivation in mammalian NaV channels (Supplementary Discussion). We previously reported the structure of NavAb from Arcobacter butzleri captured in a potentially pre-open state with four activated VSDs and a closed PM4. In space group I222, the structural model of NavAb-I217C was nearly four-fold symmetric with two very similar molecules in the asymmetric unit. The ion conductance pathway displayed a selectivity filter with a central orifice of ~4.6 Å lined by four Glu177 side-chains, followed by two sequential carbonyl sites fit to coordinate a Na+ ion in complex with a square planar array of hydrating waters4. The nearly four-fold symmetrical S6 segments formed a large central cavity and a tightly closed intracellular activation gate4. Four lateral pore fenestrations of similar size and shape were seen connecting the hydrophobic membrane phase to the central cavity, and the activated VSDs were arranged in a square array around the PM4. Here, through crystallographic and electrophysiological studies, we now describe the structure of NavAb in two potentially inactivated states.

When expressed in Trichopulsia ni cells, the wild-type NavAb channel (NavAb-WT) activates and inactivates during 7-ms depolarizing pulses from −180 mV to −40 mV (Fig. 1a). Repetitive 7-ms pulses cause a late phase of slow inactivation that is dependent on the frequency of depolarization and nears completion in 600 s at 0.2 Hz (Fig. 1a). By comparison, NavAb-I217C enters this deep slow-inactivated state more slowly and less completely, and its voltage-dependence of activation is shifted toward more negative potentials in a manner that is consistent with stabilization of the pre-open state (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2; Supplementary Results). The unusually strong, negatively shifted, and slowly reversible inactivation of NavAb-WT in Trichopulsia ni cells suggests that it might enter the late slow-inactivated state during our purification and crystallization procedures and never recover from it.

Figure 1
Structure and function of NavAb

To gain insights into the native structure of NavAb-WT, we solubilized and purified it in a mild detergent and reconstituted it into a phosphatidylcholine-based bicelle system as described for NavAb-I217C4. Merohedrally twinned crystals formed in space group P42 and the NavAb-WT structure was phased and refined to 3.2 Å resolution (Supplementary Table 3). NavAb-WT channels are arranged in the crystals as though each is embedded in a phospholipid membrane bilayer (Supplementary Fig. 2). Remarkably, the structure of NavAb-WT differs substantially from our previously reported S6-cysteine mutant channels4 (Fig. 1b–e). Four molecules in the P42 asymmetric unit give rise to two independent NavAb-WT channels composed of dimers of AB and CD subunit conformations, respectively (NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD; Fig. 1b, c). The NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD models are each unique and strikingly asymmetric in structure (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Figs. 3–5). All VSDs are in an activated conformation, and the PM of both channel appears occluded by collapse of the S6 helices of subunits B or C toward the central axis (Supplementary Figs. 3–5).

We aligned the WT NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD models onto the selectivity filter of NavAb-I217C, revealing conformational adjustments that include asymmetric collapse of the S6 activation gate (Fig. 1d), narrowing of the selectivity filter, reshaping of the central cavity and lateral pore fenestrations, and displacement of the VSDs around the PM (see below). These structural features fit well with expectations of a NaV channel captured in a slow-inactivated state (Supplementary Discussion). Multiple slow-inactivated conformations are predicted from kinetic analyses of NaV channels3, and NavAb exhibits at least two inactivated states with different kinetics of recovery from inactivation, and differential effects of the S6 mutation I217C (Supplementary Fig. 1). The observation of two discrete conformations of NavAb-WT provides a potential structural basis for these functional properties.

The inactivated state of a NaV channel is expected to be non-conductive. The closed inner ends of the S6 segments in NavAb-I217C form a nearly square array (red circle, Fig. 1e) and superimpose well upon other closed-pore tetrameric ion channel structures4,18. By contrast, the intracellular activation gate in NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD has closed in an unprecedented way. Two S6 segments from diagonally opposed subunits have moved closer to the central pore axis, while the adjacent S6 segments have shifted farther away (red oval, Fig. 1d), asymmetrically collapsing the S6 activation gate in these potentially inactivated states. This finding is consistent with biophysical studies3,1517 of bacterial and mammalian NaV channels as well as pathological mutations that have implicated this pore region in slow-inactivation gating3. This novel activation gate structure may represent a hallmark of the slow-inactivated state in NaV channels, and is in sharp contrast to the dilated activation gate observed in inactivated KcsA potassium channels19.

Conformational shifts of the S5 and S6 segments in NavAb are hinged at the extracellular side of the PM near where these segments connect to the pore (P)-helix and P2-helix, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 4c–d). Two S6 segments in NavAb-AB engage an interaction with the S4–S5 linker from a neighboring subunit near the intracellular activation gate (Fig. 1d). Electron density suggests the side-chain of Asn211 forms a stabilizing inter-subunit hydrogen bond with a backbone carbonyl in the S4–S5 linker (Fig. 1d), which is not formed in NavAb-I217C (Fig. 1e). Notably, Asn211 is the only universally conserved S6 residue in all NaV channels (Supplementary Fig. 6), yet its close interaction with the S4–S5 linker is seen only in two of the four subunits in NavAb-AB due to structural asymmetry. Mutations of the equivalent S6 Asn residue in domains I and III of vertebrate NaV channels, but not in domains II and IV, have dramatic effects on slow-inactivation20,21. Thus, NavAb may offer the first structural views of a conserved interaction occurring during slow inactivation in the NaV channel family.

Structural adjustments throughout the PM in NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD culminate in dramatic effects at the selectivity filter, where accumulating evidence implicates molecular rearrangements in slow inactivation gating in bacterial and mammalian NaV channels (Supplementary Discussion). The selectivity filter in NavAb-I217C is rigidly anchored by a hydrogen bond (~3.0 Å) between Thr175 and Trp179 of neighboring subunits4. This landmark interaction forces the Thr175 and Leu176 carbonyls to point towards the ion conduction pathway and positions the Glu177 side-chains squarely against the P2-helix (Fig. 2a, b). In NavAb-AB, two of the key Thr175-Trp179 interactions have become unlatched, since only a very weak hydrogen bond (~3.8 Å) could exist between these partners (Fig. 2a, b). In the unlatched subunits, Ser180 has also flipped its conformation to engage the Glu177 carboxylate of a neighboring subunit (Fig. 2a, b), and formation of this new hydrogen bond may correlate with entry into the inactivated state13. Concerted structural changes distort the geometry along the Thr175-Leu176 carbonyl funnel, which was perfectly sized to coordinate and conduct a fully hydrated square-planar Na+ complex in NavAb-I217C (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). Analysis of the NavAb-WT pore diameters indicates a 1–2 Å narrowing and distortion of the backbone carbonyl geometry in the central and inner Na+ coordination sites of the selectivity filter (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8), suggesting that NavAb would be less permissive to the conduction of optimally hydrated Na+ ions in these inactivated states.

Figure 2
Structural changes in the selectivity filter of NavAb

Consistent with the existence of multiple inactivated states in NavAb (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1), the Thr175-Trp179 interaction network remains intact in NavAb-CD, as does the predominant side-chain conformation of Ser180 (Fig. 2a, b). However, the Gln172 side-chain, which makes a strong interaction with the Glu177 backbone carbonyl in NavAb-I217C, is disengaged from this interaction in the NavAb-CD channel (Fig. 2a, b). Loss of this supporting interaction would destabilize the selectivity filter, similar to unlatching the Thr175-Trp179 network described above in NavAb-AB. In fact, comparison of crystallographic temperature factors suggests that the entire P-helix displays increased mobility in these inactivated states (Fig. 2c). Therefore, destabilization of the selectivity filter and concomitant remodeling of the outer pore vestibule in NavAb-WT (Fig. 2; Supplementary Figs. 5 and 8) may correlate with entry into the inactivated state. This conclusion would be consistent with the effects of toxin binding, permeant ions, and mutations in the selectivity filter of mammalian NaV channels on slow inactivation (Supplementary Discussion)3.

Overlaying the structural models of NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD onto NavAb-I217C provides insight into a network of structurally coupled residues unique to NaV channels that scaffold the selectivity filter and line the surrounding S5 and S6 segments (Fig. 3a–b). Structure- based sequence alignment of the four linked domains from mammalian NaV channels pinpoints analogous residues in the PM of NavAb: Phe144 and Phe152 in the S5 segment, Leu170 and Phe171 in the P-helix, Trp179 in the P2-helix, and Phe198 and Ile202 in the S6 segment (Fig 3a–b and Supplementary Fig. 6). Notably, substitution of the Leu170 equivalent or the Ile202 equivalent in NaV1.4 dramatically alters its slow-inactivation22,23. These comparisons highlight an evolutionarily conserved network of residues coupling the conformation of the intracellular activation gate to the selectivity filter through a molecular mechanism that results in collapse of the pore into a prominent dimer-of-dimers arrangement for all of the functional elements in NavAb-WT.

Figure 3
Conformational changes in the pore module of NavAb

The structural changes observed in NavAb-WT also alter the central cavity, where amino acid side-chains analogous to those involved in drug binding in mammalian NaV channels2427 have a different spatial arrangement due to the asymmetric collapse of two S6 segments (Fig. 3c). Local anesthetics and related pore blockers of mammalian NaV channels block the NavAb homologue NaChBac in a state-dependent manner6,16. If similar asymmetric conformational changes occur during inactivation of mammalian NaV channels (Supplementary Discussion), they could rationalize why pore-blocking drugs bind to and stabilize inactivated states of NaV channels through interactions with only three of their four S6 segments 25,26.

Four striking lateral pore fenestrations in the PM of NavAb-I217C revealed a hydrophobic access pathway to the central cavity4. Compared to the nearly identical pore fenestrations in NavAb-I217C, two diagonal fenestrations have narrowed in NavAb-AB, while the adjacent two fenestrations have opened wider (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). In NavAb-CD, both pairs of pore fenestrations are smaller than in NavAb-I217C (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 9, 10). Therefore, different-sized drugs and other hydrophobic molecules could potentially gain access to the NavAb central cavity through these differentially-sized pore fenestrations (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). If mammalian NaV channels have similar pore fenestrations, our NavAb structures predict they would provide dynamic drug access to the central cavity during different stages of channel gating, as postulated by the modulated receptor hypothesis of drug action28.

We can now compare the VSD structures from a single VGIC captured in different pore conformations for the first time. The S4 segments in all NavAb structures have a similar 310 helical conformation from R1 to R4 (Fig. 4a), suggesting S4 does not undergo a major conformational change during inactivation. Surprisingly, crystallographic temperature factors indicate that the S4 segment is the most well-ordered region of the VSD (Fig. 4b). Upon superimposing the pore domains of NavAb, a hinge point is seen at the foot of the S5 segment (Fig. 4c), as reported previously when comparing closed-pore NavAb-I217C and open-pore KV1.2 structures4. Hence, movements at this S5 gating hinge may be involved in both pore-opening4 and inactivation gating. Our NavAb structures do not provide evidence for transition of the S4 segment into a “relaxed” conformation29; however, we do observe repositioning of the entire VSD around the PM (Fig. 4d, e). This movement of the VSD with respect to the PM is likely to be required for entry into the potentially inactivated states represented by the NavAb-AB and NavAb-CD models. Perhaps pivoting of the VSD around the PM at the S5 gating hinge forces collapse of two S6 segments into an asymmetric dimer-of-dimers conformation at the activation gate. Some gating-modifier toxins have binding determinants in both the VSD and neighboring PM of ion channels (Supplementary Discussion), including NaV channels30, suggesting that nature has evolved a strategy to trap specific gating intermediates by binding toxins at this interface and locking the VSD and PM in fixed relative positions. This gating movement is a potential target for design of next-generation NaV blocking drugs that could have increased voltage-dependence and improved subtype selectivity.

Figure 4
Structure and coupling of the VSD in NavAb

Our NavAb crystal structures provide insight into conformational changes that may underlie the process of slow inactivation, a conserved property of NaV channels from bacteria to man (Supplementary Discussion). During the conformational changes that we propose lead to slow inactivation, the NavAb channel dramatically alters its central pore, moving from a nearly square arrangement in the selectivity filter, pore-lining S6 segments, and activation gate, to a strikingly asymmetric arrangement in which the four subunits morph into two pairs of conformations. This structural transition has dramatic consequences for all functional elements of NavAb, providing new templates for understanding the slow-inactivation process, the effects of disease mutations, and the complex properties of drugs that block mammalian NaV channels.

Methods Summary

WT NavAb was expressed in Trichopulsia ni insect cells, purified using anti-Flag resin and size exclusion chromatography, reconstituted into DMPC:CHAPSO bicelles, and crystallized over an ammonium sulphate solution containing 0.1 M Na-citrate, pH 4.75. A SAD data set from a SeMet-substituted protein crystal enabled phase determination and guided initial rigid body refinement protocols. Standard refinement procedures accounting for merohedral twinning were performed. Electrophysiological experiments were carried out on WT NavAb in Trichopulsia ni cells using standard protocols.

Full Methods and associated references are available in the online version of the paper at


Protein expression and purification

To the best of our knowledge31, NavAb represents the only prokaryotic membrane protein to be over-expressed in a eukaryotic expression system for structural studies to date. NavAb was cloned into the pFASTBac-Dual vector preceded by an N-terminal Flag-tag. Recombinant baculovirus were generated using the Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen). Trichopulsia ni insect cells were harvested 72 h post-infection and resuspended in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl (Buffer A) supplemented with protease inhibitors and DNase. Following sonication, digitonin (EMD Biosciences) was added to 1% and solubilization was carried out for 1–2 h at 4° C. Clarified supernatant was agitated with anti-Flag M2-agarose resin (Sigma) pre-equilibrated with Buffer B (Buffer A supplemented with 0.12% digitonin) for 1–2 h at 4° C. Flag-resin was washed with ten column volumes of Buffer B and eluted with Buffer B supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL Flag peptide. NavAb was subsequently passed over a Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) in 10 mM Tris pH 8, 100 mM NaCl and 0.12% digitonin and peak fractions were concentrated using a Vivaspin (30K MWKO) centrifugal device. Selenomethionine-labeled proteins were expressed as previously described4 and purified as above.

NavAb crystallization and data collection

NavAb was concentrated to ~20 mg/mL and reconstituted into DMPC:CHAPSO (Anatrace) bicelles according to standard protocols32. The NavAb-bicelle preparation was mixed in a 1:1 ratio and setup in a hanging-drop vapor-diffusion format over a well solution containing ~2 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM Na-citrate pH 4.75. Native and SeMet-labeled proteins crystallized under essentially identical conditions. Crystals were passed through solutions containing 2 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM Na-citrate pH 4.75 and 28% glucose (wt/v) in increments of ~6% glucose during harvesting. As previously suggested33, the inclusion of nicotinic acid at saturating concentration in the cryo solution was found to prolong the lifetime of our NavAb crystals in the x-ray beam. Crystals were plunged into liquid nitrogen and maintained at 100 K during all data collection procedures.

Over 1,500 NavAb crystals were screened at the Advanced Light Source (BL8.2.1 and BL8.2.2), but most WT NavAb crystals did not diffract beyond 3.5 Å. A single anomalous dispersion (SAD) data set collected near the selenium absorption edge (λ = 0.9792 Å) from a SeMet-labeled crystal was used to determine initial experimental phases and proved to be our best data set. In addition to nicotinic acid treatment33, special care was taken to minimize exposure times and orient the NavAb crystals in order to maximize data completeness and quality.

Structure determination and refinement

X-ray diffraction data were integrated and scaled with DENZO/SCALEPACK34 and further processed with the CCP4 package35. Initial efforts to determine and refine the NavAb-WT structure using our previous NavAb-I217C model and various protocols led to Rfree stalling at ~40%, even after accounting for the perfect merohedral twinning characteristic of the NavAb-WT crystals. Fortunately, unbiased experimental phases could be obtained using a 3.2 Å SAD-data set collected from a single SeMet-labeled crystal with the PHENIX software package36. The NavAb-I217C model was manually placed into this experimentally-phased map. Despite limited map quality, approximate boundaries to define rigid bodies in subsequent refinement procedures were apparent (at the S5 gating hinge) and led to an immediate ~6 % drop in the Rfree factor. Complete and partial poly-Ala models were used in combination with SAD phases (in PHENIX36) to assist with model re-building and side-chain placement in the program O37. Partial models were similarly used to assess and confirm the boundaries of our WT model. Both protein chains in the WT-AB channel extend from amino acid 1–219; in the WT-CD channel, chain C extends from amino acid 1–213, and chain D extends from amino acid 1–217. Only fragmented or weak electron density can be seen beyond these modeled S6 residues. At this point, the SeMet-labeled data set was reprocessed to lower redundancy (to ~3) and used as “native” data, leading to an overall improvement in data and map quality. Electron density for nine lipids and three water molecules were accounted for at this stage of model building. Application of TLS groups38, as implemented in REFMAC39,40, led to a ~1.5 % drop in the Rfree and further improvement in map quality. Although examined, NCS restraints were never applied during the refinement procedure due to the asymmetry immediately apparent within the NavAb-WT model. Tight geometric restraints were maintained throughout refinement and the overall geometry of the final NavAb-WT model is excellent (Supplementary Table 3). Only Arg68 in the S2–S3 loop (chain A and C) and Ser93 in the S3–S4 loop (chain A, C and D) appear as outliers in the Ramachandran plot (5 residues of the 880 modeled).

In order to facilitate comparison between our NavAb structures (i.e. Fig 2), and because NavAb-I217C was originally refined using the CNS software41 to 2.7 Å resolution4, the final scaled data set and deposited NavAb-I217C coordinates were re-refined using similar REFMAC procedures39,40 described above for WT-NavAb (to effective resolutions of 2.7 Å and 3.2 Å). The R/Rfree, overall map quality, geometry, and root-mean-square deviation of all refined NavAb-I217C models are highly comparable.

Structure analysis

The geometry of NavAb-WT structural models was assessed using PROCHECK42. The pore radius was calculated using standard settings in the MOLE software43 for Supplementary Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. 8. More detailed representations of the pore were obtained using the HOLLOW44 software for Fig 3d–e, Supplementary Fig. 7a, and Supplementary Figs. 9–10. Structural alignments were performed using LSQMAN45 and O37. Unless otherwise stated, all figures have been prepared with the WT-AB and WT-CD channels independently aligned onto the selectivity filter (residues Thr175-Leu176-Glu177) of the tetrameric NavAb-I217C channel model. All structural figures were prepared with the PyMol software46.


Baculovirus containing the WT-NavAb construct used for crystallography (i.e. containing an N-terminal Flag tag) were used to infect Trichopulsia ni cells. After 24 h, whole cell sodium currents were recorded using an Axopatch 200 amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) with glass micropipettes (2–5 MΩ). Capacitance was subtracted and series resistance was compensated using internal amplifier circuitry; 80% of series resistance was compensated. The intracellular pipette solution contained (in mM): 35 NaCl, 105 CsF, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 (adjusted with CsOH). The extracellular solution contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH). Voltage clamp pulses were generated and currents were recorded using Pulse software controlling an Instrutech ITC18 interface (HEKA, Great Neck, NY). Data were analysed using Igor Pro 6.2 (WaveMetrics, Lake Oswego, OR).

Supplementary Material

Supplementart Data


We thank Dr. Bertil Hille (University of Washington) for comments on a draft of the manuscript and members of the Zheng and Catterall groups for their insight and support throughout this project. We are grateful to the beamline staff at the Advanced Light Source (BL8.2.1 and BL8.2.2) for their assistance during data collection. J.P. acknowledges support from a Canadian Institutes of Health Research fellowship and the support of Naomi and Emily Payandeh. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 NS15751 and U01 NS058039 to W.A.C.) and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (N. Z.). We dedicate this work to the memory of our colleague Ms. Laura Sheard.


Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 4E6V.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author contributions

W.A.C. and N.Z. are co-senior authors. J.P., N.Z., and W.A.C. conceived and J.P. conducted the protein purification and crystallization experiments. J.P. and N.Z. determined and analyzed the structure of NavAb. T.M.G., T.S., and W.A.C. conceived, T.M.G. conducted, and T.M.G., T.S., and W.A.C. analyzed the electrophysiology experiments. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript.


1. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952;117:500–544. [PubMed]
2. Rudy B. Slow inactivation of the sodium conductance in squid giant axons. Pronase resistance. J Physiol(Lond) 1978;283:1–21. [PubMed]
3. Vilin YY, Ruben PC. Slow inactivation in voltage-gated sodium channels: molecular substrates and contributions to channelopathies. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2001;35:171–190. [PubMed]
4. Payandeh J, Scheuer T, Zheng N, Catterall WA. The crystal structure of a voltage-gated sodium channel. Nature. 2011;475:353–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Long SB, Tao X, Campbell EB, MacKinnon R. Atomic structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel in a lipid membrane-like environment. Nature. 2007;450:376–382. [PubMed]
6. Ren D, et al. A prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium channel. Science. 2001;294:2372–2375. [PubMed]
7. Catterall WA. From ionic currents to molecular mechanisms: The structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels. Neuron. 2000;26:13–25. [PubMed]
8. Armstrong CM, Bezanilla F, Rojas E. Destruction of sodium conductance inactivation in squid axons perfused with pronase. J Gen Physiol. 1973;62:375–391. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. West JW, et al. A cluster of hydrophobic amino acid residues required for fast Na+ channel inactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:10910–10914. [PubMed]
10. Eaholtz G, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Restoration of inactivation and block of open sodium channels by an inactivation gate peptide. Neuron. 1994;12:1041–1048. [PubMed]
11. Nesterenko VV, Zygmunt AC, Rajamani S, Belardinelli L, Antzelevitch C. Mechanisms of atrial-selective block of Na+ channels by ranolazine: II. Insights from a mathematical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H1615–1624. [PubMed]
12. Wang Y, et al. Merging structural motifs of functionalized amino acids and alpha-aminoamides results in novel anticonvulsant compounds with significant effects on slow and fast inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and in the treatment of neuropathic pain. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2011;2:317–322. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Pavlov E, et al. The pore, not cytoplasmic domains, underlies inactivation in a prokaryotic sodium channel. Biophys J. 2005;89:232–242. [PubMed]
14. Yue L, Navarro B, Ren D, Ramos A, Clapham DE. The cation selectivity filter of the bacterial sodium channel, NaChBac. J Gen Physiol. 2002;120:845–853. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Zhao Y, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. A gating hinge in Na+ channels; a molecular switch for electrical signaling. Neuron. 2004;41:859–865. [PubMed]
16. Zhao Y, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Reversed voltage-dependent gating of a bacterial sodium channel with proline substitutions in the S6 transmembrane segment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:17873–17878. [PubMed]
17. Irie K, et al. Comparative study of the gating motif and C-type inactivation in prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium channels. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3685–3694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Doyle DA, et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998;280:69–77. [PubMed]
19. Cuello LG, Jogini V, Cortes DM, Perozo E. Structural mechanism of C-type inactivation in K+ channels. Nature. 2010;466:203–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Chen Y, Yu FH, Surmeier DJ, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Neuromodulation of Na+ channel slow inactivation via cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C. Neuron. 2006;49:409–420. [PubMed]
21. Wang SY, Wang GK. A mutation in segment I-S6 alters slow inactivation of sodium channels. Biophys J. 1997;72:1633–1640. [PubMed]
22. Vilin YY, Fujimoto E, Ruben PC. A single residue differentiates between human cardiac and skeletal muscle Na+ channel slow inactivation. Biophys J. 2001;80:2221–2230. [PubMed]
23. Zarrabi T, et al. A molecular switch between the outer and the inner vestibules of the voltage-gated Na+ channel. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39458–39470. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Ragsdale DS, McPhee JC, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Molecular determinants of state-dependent block of sodium channels by local anesthetics. Science. 1994;265:1724–1728. [PubMed]
25. Yarov-Yarovoy V, et al. Molecular determinants of voltage-dependent gating and binding of pore-blocking drugs in transmembrane segment IIIS6 of the Na+ channel α subunit. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20–27. [PubMed]
26. Yarov-Yarovoy V, et al. Role of amino acid residues in transmembrane segments IS6 and IIS6 of the sodium channel α subunit in voltage-dependent gating and drug block. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:35393–35401. [PubMed]
27. Nau C, Wang GK. Interactions of local anesthetics with voltage-gated Na+ channels. J Membr Biol. 2004;201:1–8. [PubMed]
28. Hille B. Local anesthetics: hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for the drug-receptor reaction. J Gen Physiol. 1977;69:497–515. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Villalba-Galea CA, Sandtner W, Starace DM, Bezanilla F. S4-based voltage sensors have three major conformations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:17600–17607. [PubMed]
30. Wang J, et al. Mapping the receptor site for alpha-scorpion toxins on a Na+ channel voltage sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:15426–15431. [PubMed]
31. Koth CM, Payandeh J. Strategies for the cloning and expression of membrane proteins. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2009;76:43–86. [PubMed]
32. Faham S, et al. Crystallization of bacteriorhodopsin from bicelle formulations at room temperature. Protein Sci. 2005;14:836–840. [PubMed]
33. Kauffmann B, Weiss MS, Lamzin VS, Schmidt A. How to avoid premature decay of your macromolecular crystal: a quick soak for long life. Structure. 2006;14:1099–1105. [PubMed]
34. Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Vol. 276. Academic Press; 1997.
35. CCP4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1994;50:760–763. [PubMed]
36. Adams PD, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:213–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Jones TA, Zou JY, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr A. 1991;47 (Pt 2):110–119. [PubMed]
38. Painter J, Merritt EA. Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TLS motion. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006;62:439–450. [PubMed]
39. Winn MD, Murshudov GN, Papiz MZ. Macromolecular TLS refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions. Methods Enzymol. 2003;374:300–321. [PubMed]
40. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1997;53:240–255. [PubMed]
41. Brunger AT, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1998;54:905–921. [PubMed]
42. Laskowski RA, Moss DS, Thornton JM. Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. J Mol Biol. 1993;231:1049–1067. [PubMed]
43. Petrek M, Kosinova P, Koca J, Otyepka M. MOLE: a Voronoi diagram-based explorer of molecular channels, pores, and tunnels. Structure. 2007;15:1357–1363. [PubMed]
44. Ho BK, Gruswitz F. HOLLOW: generating accurate representations of channel and interior surfaces in molecular structures. BMC Struct Biol. 2008;8:49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Kleywegt GJ. Use of non-crystallographic symmetry in protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 1996;52:842–857. [PubMed]
46. PyMOL. (Version 1.2r3pre)