To date, most studies have involved acute total sleep deprivation (involving no sleep from time of awakening for 24 hours and in some studies for up to 126 hours). Study designs using acute partial sleep deprivation (a single night of reduced sleep time) or chronic partial sleep deprivation (multiple nights of reduced sleep time) have also been used. Chronic partial sleep deprivation protocols typically last for 2–14 days, and attempt to model physiological effects of chronic insufficient sleep. These controlled experimental models are useful tools by which to investigate the effects of sleep loss on physiological systems in healthy individuals. To date, these approaches have typically used rigorously screened, healthy volunteers as study participants, which is a necessary preliminary step in order to begin to look at the mechanisms of how sleep loss affects physiological systems, in vivo.
Studies on the effects of sleep loss on immune function have examined WBC counts and differential cells, and studied how they changed across time under conditions of reduced or absent sleep. An early experimental study involving up to five days and nights of wakefulness, conducted in Czechoslovakia in the 1960s (
36), reported increased WBCs, most notably neutrophils, in response to sleep deprivation. An increase in leukocytes has been confirmed in subsequent sleep deprivation research involving continuous wakefulness of >40h (
37–
41). Some studies have also found increased WBC subsets, particularly neutrophils (
36,
39–
41), and monocytes (
37,
39,
40). Most studies have found no increase in lymphocytes in response to sleep loss. Increased WBC counts in these studies of sleep deprivation were recognized as a sign of host defense activation. Later, it was found that IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha, are also elevated during acute sleep deprivation, although the specific mediators may vary between studies (
42–
48).
Studies have also examined inflammatory system changes that occur in response to controlled experimental partial sleep deprivation, or reduced sleep time in individuals who normally sleep approximately eight hours per night. In the first of these studies, Shearer and colleagues (
47) found that men who were permitted to sleep only two hours twice a day, once at night and once in the afternoon, for four days showed no increase in IL-6, TNF-alpha, or TNF-alpha receptors. In another study that investigated the effects of ten days of sleep reduced to 4 hours per night, no change was found in TNF-alpha or its soluble type I receptor, although IL-6 was increased (
44). In another study, two hours of sleep reduction per night for seven nights led to increased TNF-alpha in healthy men but not women, but increased IL-6 in both men and women (
49). In a study of sleep restricted to 4 hours per night and centered on the mid-sleep time of habitual sleep, IL-6 and CRP were also found to be elevated (
45). Another recent study provided sleep opportunity for 4h/night for five nights and found increased IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-17 and hsCRP (
48).
There are a number of factors to consider when interpreting data associating insufficient or disturbed sleep with inflammation. These are particularly important when considering studies with small numbers of subjects. Specifically, there are large individual differences in basal levels of inflammation that are associated with a range of factors, even in apparently healthy individuals. Among these are: stress and activity level prior to sample blood draw, proximity to meal intake, smoking status, and adiposity and other metabolic factors (discussed further below). In addition, some studies have found circadian rhythms for cytokines such as IL-6 (
50–
52); these finding indicate that the timing and frequency of sampling also needs to be considered. Assays used have varied in their range of sensitivity and specificity and thus, detectability and ease of measurement may influence selection of analytes and outcomes. Effects of catheter (
53) and contamination (
54) may further contribute to noise in the data and cause spurious results. Given this multitude of factors, the inclusion of appropriate controls and specimen documentation are essential, as is replication and analysis of the relationship between sleep loss and inflammation from multiple study approaches.
In sum, well-known markers of the acute inflammatory system, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, IL-6 and CRP have all demonstrated responsiveness to sleep manipulation in humans. Many experimental factors, such as light and activity levels, experimental activities and stress involved in the protocols or testing environments, the timing of sleep loss and sampling frequency, as well as genetic and individual differences in responsiveness to stimulation by sleep loss, may underlie the pattern of cytokine stimulation seen in a given study. Alteration from basal levels indicates an activated inflammatory system. While commonly referred to as “pro-inflammatory”, they are in fact pleiotropic cytokines that have receptor families that help to regulate the balance of the inflammatory response. Redundancy built into the inflammatory cytokine network such that, very often, if one cytokine is knocked out, another can fill its role. Thus, inflammatory cytokines work together to promote and subdue the inflammatory, phagocytic and coagulatory stages involved in protecting the body and maintaining immune system homeostasis. In fact, the same cytokines can sometimes be seen to work to both increase and decrease the inflammatory response (
55). How these cytokine networks communicate and work together is an intensely investigated area of research. And, more and more, the genetic influences and their implications for therapeutic intervention in these systems is appreciated (
56).