Aebi S, Castiglione M. The enigma of young age. Ann. Oncol. 2006;17(10):1475–1477. [PubMed]  Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, Hahn SM, Lee CN, Millon-Underwood S, Pike MC, Reed S, Saftlas AF, Scarvalone SA, Schwartz AM, Slomski C, Yothers G, Zon R. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, September 22–24, 2009. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010;102(3):161–169. [PubMed]
 American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2009–2010. American Cancer Society; Atlanta, USA: 2009.
 American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures 2009. American Cancer Society; Atlanta, USA: 2009.
 American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™) 4th edition. 2003.
 Anderson WF, Chu KC, Devesa SS. Distinct incidence patterns among in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, with possible etiologic implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;88(2):149–159. [PubMed]  Burnside ES, Davis J, Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Lindstrom MJ, Geller BM, Littenberg B, Shaffer KA, Kahn CE, Page D. Probabilistic computer model developed from clinical data in national mammography database format to classify mammographic findings. Radiology. 2009;251:663–672. [PubMed]  Burnside ES, Rubin DL, Shachter RD. Using a Bayesian network to predict the probability and type of breast cancer represented by microcalcifications on mammography. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):13–17. [PubMed]
 Cleary TA. Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement. 1968;5(2):115–124.
 Collins LC, Tamimi RM, Baer HJ, Connolly JL, Colditz GA, Schnitt SJ. Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy: results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer. 2005;103(9):1778–1784. [PubMed]
 Davis J, Burnside ES, de Castro Dutra I, Page D, Ramakrishnan R, Santos Costa V, Shavlik J. View Learning for Statistical Relational Learning: With an application to mammography. Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Edinburgh, Scotland. 2005. pp. 677–683.
 Davis J, Burnside ES, de Castro Dutra I, Page D, Santos Costa V. An integrated approach to learning Bayesian Networks of rules. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Machine Learning; Porto, Portugal. 2005. pp. 84–95.
 De Raedt L. Logical and Relational Learning. Springer; 2008.
 Dubsky PC, Gnant MFX, Taucher S, Roka S, Kandioler D, Pichler-Gebhard B, Agstner I, Seifert M, Sevelda P, Jakesz R. Young age as an independent adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;3:65–72. [PubMed]  Duggleby SL, Jackson AA, Godfrey KM, Robinson SM, Inskip HM., Southampton Womens Survey Study Group Cut-off points for anthropometric indices of adiposity: differential classification in a large population of young women. British Journal of Nutrition. 2009;101:424–430. [PubMed]  Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(16):1089–1096. [PubMed]  Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Taplin SH, Urban N, Geller BM. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(20):1546–1554. [PubMed]  Fowble BL, Schultz DJ, Overmoyer B, Solin LJ, Fox K, Jardines L, Orel S, Glick JH. The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30(1):23–33. [PubMed]
 Friedman N, Geiger D, Goldszmidt M. Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning. 1997;29:131–163.
 Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000;190(5):523–529. [PubMed]  Ghosh K, Melton L, Jr, Suman VJ, Grant CS, Sterioff S, Brandt KR, Branch C, Sellers TA, Hartmann LC. Breast biopsy utilization: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(14):1593–1598. [PubMed]
 Goutte C, Gaussier E. A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and F-score, with implication for evaluation. Proc of the 27th European Conference on IR Research; Spain: Santiago de Compostela; 2005. pp. 345–359.
 Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2009;11(1):10–18.
 Hansotia B, Rukstales B. Incremental value modeling. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2002;16(3):35–46.
 Harris EE, Hwang WT, Urtishak SL, Plastaras J, Kinosian B, SLJ The impact of comorbidities on outcomes for elderly women treated with breast-conservation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(5):1453–1459. [PubMed]  Jayasinghe UW, Taylor R, Boyages J. Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer? ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(9):762–767. [PubMed]  Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ. 2009;339:b2587. [PMC free article] [PubMed]  Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, Brandt KR, Wang A, Janney C, Fredericksen ZS, Cerhan JR, Vachon CM. Age-specific trends in mammographic density. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2008;167(9):1027–1036. [PubMed]  Kopans DB, Moore RH, McCarthy KA, Hall DA, Hulka CA, Whitman GJ, Slanetz PJ, Halpern EF. Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years. Radiology. 1996 Aug;200(2):357–360. [PubMed]
 Linn RL. Single-group validity, differential validity, and differential prediction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1978;63:507–512.
 Liu Y, Pérez M, Schootman M, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Ellis MJ, Jeffe DB. A longitudinal study of factors associated with perceived risk of recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Epub ahead of print. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
 Lo VS. The true lift model - a novel data mining approach to response modeling in database marketing. SIGKDD Explorations. 2002;4(2):78–86.
 Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–1087. [PubMed]  McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Freund KM, Ash AS, Shwartz M, Marwill SL, Moskowitz MA. Mammography use, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and survival among older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(10):1226–1233. [PubMed]
 Mitchell TM. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill International Editions; Singapore: 1997.
 Muggleton SH. Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing. 1995;13:245–286.
 Nassif H, Page D, Ayvaci M, Shavlik J, Burnside ES. Uncovering age-specific invasive and DCIS breast cancer rules using Inductive Logic Programming. 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium; Arlington, VA. 2010. pp. 76–82.
 Nassif H, Santos Costa V, Burnside ES, Page D. ECML-PKDD 2012. Bristol, UK: 2012. Relational differential prediction. Accepted.
 Nassif H, Wood R, Burnside ES, Ayvaci M, Shavlik J, Page D. ICDM Workshops. Miami, Florida: 2009. Information extraction for clinical data mining: A mammography case study; pp. 37–42.
 Patani N, Cutuli B, Mokbel K. Current management of DCIS: a review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111(1):1–10. [PubMed]  Phibbs B, Nelson W. Differential classification of acute myocardial infarction into ST- and Non-ST segment elevation is not valid or rational. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. 2010;15(3):191–199. [PubMed]  Poplack SP, Carney PA, Weiss JE, Titus-Ernstoff L, Goodrich ME, Tosteson AN. Screening mammography: costs and use of screening-related services. Radiology. 2005;234(1):79–85. [PubMed]
 Radcliffe NJ, Surry PD. Credit Scoring and Credit Control VI. Edinburgh, Scotland: 1999. Differential response analysis: Modeling true response by isolating the effect of a single action.
 Randolph WM, Goodwin JS, Mahnken JD, Freeman JL. Regular mammography use is associated with elimination of age-related disparities in size and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(10):783–790. [PubMed]  Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, Key CR, Linver MN. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. 1998;209(2):511–518. [PubMed]  Sanders ME, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Page DL. The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up. Cancer. 2005;103(12):2481–2484. [PubMed]
 Santos Costa V. The life of a logic programming system. In: de la Banda MG, Pontelli E, editors. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming; Udine, Italy. 2008. pp. 1–6.
 Schnitt SJ. Local outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ based on patient and tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010;(41):158–161. [PubMed]
 Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. 4th edition. 2003.
 Srinivasan A. The Aleph Manual. 4th edition. 2007.
 Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T, Tung TH, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1–14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1745–1759. [PubMed]  Thurfjell MG, Lindgren A, Thurfjell E. Nonpalpable breast cancer: Mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type. Radiology. 2002;222(1):165–170. [PubMed]
 Vincent GK, Velkoff VA. THE NEXT FOUR DECADES, The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. U.S. Census Bureau; Washington, DC: 2010. Number P25-1138 in Current Population Reports.
 Virnig BA, Wang SY, Shamilyan T, Kane RL, Tuttle TM. Ductal carcinoma in situ: Risk factors and impact of screening. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):113–116. [PubMed]  Vlaar AMM, Bouwmans A, Mess WH, Tromp SC, Weber WEJ. Transcranial duplex in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes: a systematic review. Journal of Neurology. 2009;256(4):530–538. [PubMed]  Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(9):605–613. [PubMed]  Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA, Havlik RJ, Edwards BK, Yates JW. Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older. JAMA. 2001;285(7):885–892. [PubMed]
 Young JW. Research Report 2001–6. The College Board; New York: 2001. Differential validity, differential prediction, and college admissions testing: A comprehensive review and analysis.