PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jbcThe Journal of Biological Chemistry
 
J Biol Chem. 2013 January 4; 288(1): 552–560.
Published online 2012 November 7. doi:  10.1074/jbc.M112.426171
PMCID: PMC3537052

F-box and Leucine-rich Repeat Protein 5 (FBXL5) Is Required for Maintenance of Cellular and Systemic Iron Homeostasis*An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpg

Abstract

Maintenance of cellular iron homeostasis requires post-transcriptional regulation of iron metabolism genes by iron regulatory protein 2 (IRP2). The hemerythrin-like domain of F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5), an E3 ubiquitin ligase subunit, senses iron and oxygen availability and facilitates IRP2 degradation in iron replete cells. Disruption of the ubiquitously expressed murine Fbxl5 gene results in a failure to sense increased cellular iron availability, accompanied by constitutive IRP2 accumulation and misexpression of IRP2 target genes. FBXL5-null mice die during embryogenesis, although viability is restored by simultaneous deletion of the IRP2, but not IRP1, gene. Mice containing a single functional Fbxl5 allele behave like their wild type littermates when fed an iron-sufficient diet. However, unlike wild type mice that manifest decreased hematocrit and hemoglobin levels when fed a low-iron diet, Fbxl5 heterozygotes maintain normal hematologic values due to increased iron absorption. The responsiveness of IRP2 to low iron is specifically enhanced in the duodena of the heterozygotes and is accompanied by increased expression of the divalent metal transporter-1. These results confirm the role of FBXL5 in the in vivo maintenance of cellular and systemic iron homeostasis and reveal a privileged role for the intestine in their regulation by virtue of its unique FBXL5 iron sensitivity.

Keywords: E3 Ubiquitin Ligase, Gene Knockout, Iron, Iron Metabolism, Metal Homeostasis, Iron Regulatory Proteins

Introduction

Iron is widely employed throughout biology. Failure to maintain bioavailable iron concentrations within appropriate levels may result in deleterious consequences ranging from anemia to iron overload disease (1, 2). IRPs3 regulate the post-transcriptional expression of several iron metabolism genes upon binding iron responsive elements (IREs) within the 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of their mRNAs in iron-depleted cells (3, 4). For example, synthesis of the iron storage protein ferritin heavy chain 1 is reduced upon binding of IRPs to its 5′ IRE (5). Conversely, iron uptake is promoted by stabilization of the mRNAs encoding the iron import factors transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) and DMT-1 upon IRP binding to IREs within their 3′ UTRs (4, 6). As iron bioavailability increases, IRPs lose their RNA binding capacity either through conformational changes resulting from the enhanced FeS cluster assembly within IRP1 (3) or enhanced proteasomal degradation of IRP2 (7).

Selective degradation of IRP2 is preceded by its iron-dependent polyubiquitination via a Skp1/Cul1/Rbx1 (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex containing FBXL5 (8, 9). FBXL5 contains an N-terminal hemerythrin-like domain characterized by a helical bundle held together by a di-iron center (811). When iron and oxygen are abundant, this domain resides in a compact conformation that masks a degron within the hemerythrin-like domain itself, promoting FBXL5 accumulation and subsequent IRP2 degradation (11, 12). When low levels of bioavailable iron limit assembly of the di-iron center, the hemerythrin-like degron becomes accessible and FBXL5 is degraded by the proteasome (1113). These properties of the FBXL5 hemerythrin-like domain suggest that it is a key sensor of bioavailable ferrous iron within cells (14). The importance of FBXL5 to the maintenance of cellular iron homeostasis was initially confirmed through siRNA-mediated knockdown of FBXL5 expression, which resulted in inappropriate stabilization of IRP2 in iron-replete cells (8). Such cells aberrantly repress ferritin expression while promoting continued iron uptake through stabilization of the TfR1 mRNA (8, 9, 15), exacerbating the metabolic stress of excessive iron.

To investigate the in vivo role for FBXL5 in the maintenance of iron homeostasis, we generated mice in which the Fbxl5 gene locus has been disrupted. FBXL5-null mice die during embryogenesis due to unregulated IRP2 accumulation. Fbxl5 heterozygotes, although viable, exhibit an unexpected phenotype. Unlike their wild type littermates, these mice maintain their hematocrit and hemoglobin levels when challenged with a low iron diet. Here we show that although Fbxl5 heterozygosity has little apparent effect on the iron-responsive behavior of most tissues, iron absorption through the duodenum is substantially altered. These results suggest that the FBXL5-dependent iron sensitivity of the cells within the intestine is set differently from other cells in the body and, as a consequence, FBXL5 plays a previously unrecognized role in systemic iron homeostasis.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals

Murine 129 Sv/Ev embryonic stem cells heterozygous for the gene-trapped Fbxl5 allele (clone OST386421) were obtained from Texas A&M Institute for Genomic Medicine and injected into C57Bl/6J blastocysts at the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Transgenic Technology Center. The resulting chimeric mice were crossed to C57Bl/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories) to produce heterozygous animals. Backcrossing Fbxl5 heterozygous mice of mixed background to wild type 129 Sv/Ev mice resulted in the generation of syngeneic Fbxl5+/GT mice that were 99.99% of 129 Sv/Ev genetic background as determined by speed congenics (Taconic). Fbxl5 wild type and Fbxl5 heterozygous mice were weaned onto a ad libitum iron-sufficient (50 ppm) or low iron (5 ppm) diet (Harlan-Teklad) for 3 weeks. For the 59Fe feeding experiments, mice fed a low iron diet for 3 weeks were then fasted for 24 h and gavaged with an olive-tipped needle containing 200 μl of PBS supplemented with 2.5 μCi of 59FeCl3 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and 0.5 m ascorbic acid. At the indicated time points, animals were exsanguinated and 59Fe accumulation in tissues was measured in a Packard Cobra Gamma Counter. Blood samples were collected from the tail vein or via cardiac puncture following intraperitoneal administration of anesthetic rodent mixture (ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine). Complete Blood Count analysis was performed by the UTSW Diagnostic Lab. Serum iron concentration, iron saturation, and total iron binding capacity were measured by Idexx Laboratories, Cornell University. The Irp1−/− and Irp2−/− (16, 17) mice were generously provided by Matthias Hentze. All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the UTSW Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Isolation, Culture, and Characterization of Mouse Embryonic Cells

Mouse embryonic cells were prepared as described (18). Briefly, E8 embryos were digested with trypsin at 37 °C for 30 min. Cells were cultured on a layer of mitotic inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells in Dulbecco's modified high glucose Eagle's medium (HyClone) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biological), 1× nonessential amino acids (HyClone), 1× penicillin and streptomycin (HyClone), 2 mm glutamine (HyClone), 55 μm β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), and 110 mg/liter of pyruvate (Hyclone). After 4 weeks, cells were grown without feeder cells and immortalized upon transfection of the SV40 large T antigen (pSV3-Neo, ATCC) with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Stably transfected cells were selected in the presence of 500 μg/ml of G418.

Additional “Materials and Methods”

See supplemental “Materials and Methods” for supporting information.

RESULTS

FBXL5 Is Ubiquitously Expressed

As all mammalian cells have a requirement for iron, yet are susceptible to damage when bioavailable iron accumulates, a bona fide cellular iron sensor should be ubiquitously expressed. FBXL5 mRNA levels were quantitated by quantitative PCR across panels of human and murine tissue extracts. As predicted, FBXL5 expression was detected in all samples with the highest relative levels present in the brain, particularly the metal-rich cerebellum (19), eye, and testis (Fig. 1, A and B). These same FBXL5 mRNA-abundant tissues also tend to express relatively high levels of IRP1 and IRP2 mRNAs (Fig. 1, A and B, and Ref. 20). In the mouse, FBXL5 expression is high at embryonic day (E) 7.5 (Fig. 1B), suggesting a role in early embryogenesis, although its expression decreases as the embryo progresses through development (E11 and E15).

FIGURE 1.
FBXL5 is ubiquitously expressed in humans and mice. Relative mRNA levels of FBXL5, IRP1, and IRP2 were quantitated by quantitative PCR from human (A) and murine (B) tissue samples. Each column represents the average of three experiments ± S.D. ...

Mice Lacking a Functional FBXL5 Gene Die during Embryogenesis

Insertion of a gene-trapping (GT) vector downstream of the second exon of FBXL5 generated a disrupted allele (Fbxl5GT; Fig. 2). Progeny from mice containing one copy of this nonfunctional allele were genotyped at various developmental time points. Although wild type (Fbxl5+/+), heterozygous (Fbxl5+/GT), and homozygous null (Fbxl5GT/GT) embryos were initially observed in a Mendelian 1:2:1 ratio, no Fbxl5GT/GT pups were born (Table 1). In the mixed genetic background of our mice, E9.5 Fbxl5GT/GT embryos exhibited growth retardation as compared with wild type and heterozygous littermates (Fig. 3A). Although developmentally delayed, histopathological analysis revealed that E9.5 Fbxl5GT/GT embryos had undergone normal placentation (Fig. 3, B and C), gastrulation, and cardiovascular development (Fig. 3D). However, at E10.5 these embryos appeared very distorted and were completely absorbed by day E12.5.

FIGURE 2.
Disruption of the murine Fbxl5 gene. A, embryonic stem cells containing a gene-trapped (GT) Fbxl5 allele were used to generate FBXL5-null mice. A trapping vector containing a promoter-less neomycin (Neo) resistance cassette flanked by a splicing acceptor ...
TABLE 1
Genotypes of embryos from heterozygous matings
FIGURE 3.
Characterization of Fbxl5GT/GT embryos. A, Fbxl5GT/GT embryos exhibit growth retardation with respect to their wild type (Fbxl5+/+) and heterozygous (Fbxl5+/GT) littermates. Embryos were harvested at day E9.5 and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Bar, 1 mm. ...

Iron Metabolism Genes are Aberrantly Regulated in FBXL5GT/GT Mouse Embryonic Cells

Given the proposed role of FBXL5 in mediating cellular iron homeostasis, we suspected that Fbxl5GT/GT embryos would fail to properly regulate IRE-containing mRNAs. Due to the early embryonic lethality of the Fbxl5GT/GT mice, we generated mouse embryonic cell lines from Fbxl5+/+, Fbxl5+/GT, and Fbxl5GT/GT embryos (Fig. 4A) harvested on day E8. Fbxl5+/+ and Fbxl5+/GT cells depleted of bioavailable iron with the metal chelator deferoxamine mesylate (DFO) strongly accumulate IRP2 compared with iron-replete cells incubated with ferric ammonium citrate. However, Fbxl5GT/GT cells aberrantly accumulate IRP2 under both conditions (Fig. 4C). Total IRP1 protein levels remained constant under all conditions and in all cell types (Fig. 4C). This inappropriately accumulated IRP2 is competent for IRE binding (Fig. 4D) and Fbxl5GT/GT cells exhibit increased TfR1 expression and decreased ferritin expression under iron replete conditions (Fig. 4, B and C). An increase in iron uptake, coupled with a decrease in iron storage capacity, could result in the overaccumulation of iron accompanied by increased oxidative stress in these FBXL5-null cells.

FIGURE 4.
Iron metabolism genes are aberrantly regulated in FBXL5GT/GT mouse embryonic cells. A, mouse embryonic cells genotypes assessed by PCR assay (Fig. 2). B, relative TfR1 mRNA accumulation measured by quantitative PCR (supplemental Table S3). Each column ...

To ascertain whether embryonic lethality was due to deregulated IRP2 expression, we crossed Fbxl5+/GT mice with IRP2 knock-out mice (21). Viable Irp2−/−; Fbxl5GT/GT mice were born from Irp2+/−; Fbxl5+/GT intercrosses, although no Irp2+; Fbxl5GT/GT mice were observed (Table 2). Like their littermates, Irp2−/−; Fbxl5GT/GT mice grow normally and are fertile. This result suggests that the early embryonic mortality of FBXL5-null animals is due to the constitutive accumulation of IRP2 with concomitant dysregulation of its target genes. Interestingly, when Irp1+/−; Fbxl5+/GT mice were crossed, no Irp1−/−; Fbxl5GT/GT pups were observed at birth (Table 3), despite the significant redundancy in IRP1 and IRP2 function (22, 23).

TABLE 2
Genotypes of mice produced from Fbxl5+/GT; Irp2+/− intercrosses
TABLE 3
Genotypes of mice produced from Fbxl5+/GT; Irp1+/− intercrosses

Fbxl5+/GT Mice Differ from Fbxl5+/+ Littermates When Fed a Low Iron Diet

To determine whether Fbxl5+/GT mice manifest a non-overt iron-related phenotype(s), we challenged wild type and heterozygous mice with a low iron (5 ppm) diet and compared their results to mice weaned onto an iron-sufficient (50 ppm) diet (23, 24). After 3 weeks ingesting the specified diets, complete blood counts and serum iron levels were determined. Wild type mice fed a low iron diet exhibited an expected 77% decrease in serum iron levels despite a compensatory 149% increase in the total iron binding capacity of transferrin (Table 4). Consistent with the low dietary iron availability, wild type animals report significant reductions in hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, and a modest reduction in the number of red blood cells (RBC) (Table 4). All measurements taken from Fbxl5+/GT mice fed an iron-sufficient (50 ppm) diet were indistinguishable from control Fbxl5+/+ mice. Even Fbxl5+/GT mice fed a low iron diet exhibit similar changes in serum iron and total iron binding capacity values to those of their wild type counterparts (Table 4). However, this reduced iron availability does not result in any corresponding reductions in hematocrit, hemoglobin, or erythrocyte levels in the Fbxl5 heterozygotes (Table 4). To guard against the possibility that this unexpected phenotype was due to the mixed genetic background of these mice, Fbxl5+/GT mice were backcrossed to 129 Sv/Ev mice to generate syngeneic Fbxl5+/GT mice. Just like their mixed background Fbxl5+/GT counterparts, syngeneic Fbxl5+/GT mice still maintained normal hematologic values when fed a low iron diet (Table 5). These data suggest that Fbxl5+/GT mice have altered their systemic iron homeostasis so as to make iron preferentially available to the erythroid compartment, irrespective of genetic background.

TABLE 4
Hematological parameters and serum values from Fbxl5+/+ and Fbxl5+/GT mice fed either an iron sufficient or low iron diet
TABLE 5
Hematological parameters and serum values from syngeneic Fbxl5+/+ and Fbxl5+/GT mice fed either an iron sufficient or low iron diet

Iron Absorption and Systemic Distribution Are Altered in Fbxl5+/GT Mice Fed a Low Iron Diet

We hypothesized that the requisite iron needed to maintain normal hematocrit and hemoglobin values in Fbxl5+/GT mice could be made available either through depletion of iron stores or through increased intestinal absorption. The metal content of the liver, a major site of iron storage (4), was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (supplemental Fig. S1 and Fig. 5). As shown in Fig. 5, total iron content in the liver was reduced in an equivalent amount in all mice fed the low iron diet for 3 weeks, providing no indication that additional iron was mobilized from Fbxl5+/GT liver stores.

FIGURE 5.
Total iron concentration in Fbxl5+/+ and Fbxl5+/GT mice. The iron (Fe) content in perfused livers from Fbxl5+/+ and Fbxl5+/GT mice fed either an iron-sufficient (S; 50 ppm) or a low (L; 5 ppm) iron diet for 3 weeks was determined by inductively coupled ...

To determine whether Fbxl5+/GT mice are more efficient than wild type mice at absorbing limiting dietary iron, 59Fe was directly introduced via gastric gavage into the stomachs of mice that had been fed a low iron diet for 3 weeks and the distribution of 59Fe in various tissues was measured over time. After 1 h, almost 80-fold more 59Fe was incorporated within the duodena of Fbxl5+/GT mice as compared with wild type animals (Fig. 6A). This increased efficiency in intestinal uptake was accompanied by a corresponding 3-fold increase in serum 59Fe levels (Fig. 6B). The whole body distribution of 59Fe is also markedly different in the Fbxl5+/GT mice, as this newly absorbed iron is made preferentially available to the spleen (Fig. 6C) and the bone marrow (Fig. 6D, femur) for rapid incorporation into red blood cells (Fig. 6E), rather than sites of storage (Fig. 6F, liver).

FIGURE 6.
Fbxl5+/GT mice fed a low iron diet for 3 weeks have altered 59Fe absorption and distribution profiles compared with wild type littermates. 59Fe levels were measured in the (A) duodenum, (B) serum, (C) spleen, (D) femur, (E) red blood cells, and (F) liver ...

Fbxl5 Heterozygosity Specifically Alters the Iron Responsiveness of the Duodenum

Although Fbxl5+/GT mice are indistinguishable from Fbxl5+/+ mice when fed an iron-sufficient diet, the heterozygous mice take up iron more efficiently when dietary availability is limiting. To determine the underlying cause of this difference, immunoblot analysis was used to examine the expression of iron metabolism genes. In wild type mice fed a low iron diet, intestinal iron absorption is typically promoted in multiple ways. At the cell autonomous level (25, 26), IRP activity is induced within iron-depleted intestinal epithelial cells (supplemental Fig. S2), stabilizing an IRE-containing DMT-1 transcript (supplemental Table S1) and subsequently promoting iron uptake through increased DMT-1 expression (Fig. 7A). At the same time, reduced serum iron levels attenuate hepcidin (HAMP) transcription in the liver (supplemental Table S1) (27). A reduction in circulating hepcidin levels stabilizes the iron export protein ferroportin (Fig. 7A) to facilitate iron absorption through the intestine (27, 28). In the Fbxl5+/GT animals, the systemic, ferroportin-dependent, response is identical to Fbxl5+/+ mice, both at the level of hepcidin expression in the liver (supplemental Table S1) and ferroportin accumulation in the duodenum (Fig. 7A). However, the cell autonomous response to low iron is dramatically altered in the duodena of Fbxl5+/GT mice fed a low iron diet. IRP2 protein levels are 7-fold higher than in the corresponding wild type mice (Fig. 7A and supplemental Table S2). The accompanying 2-fold increase in IRP-binding activity (Fig. 7C) mimics the 2-fold additional increase in the IRE-containing DMT-1 mRNA (but not the IRE-independent DMT-1 mRNA isoform; supplemental Table S1) and DMT-1 protein levels (Fig. 7A and supplemental Table S2) in the Fbxl5+/GT duodenum samples. Interestingly, this enhanced IRP responsiveness appears to be primarily limited to the intestine as the expression of iron metabolism genes was identical between wild type and heterozygous livers (Fig. 7B), spleens, and brains (supplemental Tables S1 and S2). Similar results were observed in syngeneic Fbxl5+/GT mice (supplemental Fig. S3). Interestingly, through Irp2−/−; Fbxl5GT/GT mice are viable, the lack of FBXL5 was not sufficient to reverse the anemia that accompanies Irp2 deletion.4 This result further supports a role for IRP2 in mediating the erythropoietic phenotypes observed in Fbxl5 heterozygotes.

FIGURE 7.
The duodena of FBXL5+/GT mice display a heightened responsiveness to a low iron diet. Immunoblot analysis of IRP2 and its targets DMT1, TfR1, ferroportin (FPN1), and ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) in the duodenum (A) and liver (B) of FBXL5+/+ and FBXL5 ...

DISCUSSION

FBXL5 plays a critical role in the maintenance of cellular iron homeostasis (8, 9). Here we show that previous in vitro findings extend to a required in vivo role for FBXL5. Global inactivation of the Fbxl5 gene results in embryonic lethality, with growth defects readily apparent prior to day E9 despite normal placentation, gastrulation, and cardiovascular development. Cells derived from FBXL5-null embryos are unable to sufficiently degrade IRP2 when incubated in the presence of excess iron and are apt to import iron that cannot be appropriately sequestered within the limiting amount of ferritin available. Using an independently generated Fbxl5 knock-out mouse, it was recently shown that FBXL5-null embryos accumulate excess ferrous iron and are exposed to damaging levels of oxidative stress (15). Although many E3 ligases ubiquitinate multiple substrates (29), simultaneous inactivation of both the Fbxl5 and Irp2 genes is sufficient to rescue embryonic lethality, also consistent with the prior report (15).

Despite sharing >70% identity (30), the mechanisms by which the IRE-binding activity of IRP1 and IRP2 are inactivated in iron-replete cells largely differ (31). Both FBXL5-mediated degradation (8, 9) and IRE recognition of IRP1 are inactivated by iron upon insertion of an iron-sulfur cluster (3133), although the contribution of protein degradation to in vivo IRP1 regulation is not completely understood (8, 9, 32, 34). In extracts from both mouse embryonic cells and the duodenum, IRE binding by IRP1 is enhanced upon partial or complete FBXL5 inactivation (Fig. 4D), even though total IRP1 protein accumulation remains relatively constant (Fig. 4C). However, if only a small percentage of IRP1 protein were competent for RNA binding, as is the case in liver and perhaps other tissues (23, 32, 35), significant changes in the accumulation of this apo form may be difficult to detect over the background of bulk holo-IRP1. Alternatively, iron-sulfur cluster assembly on IRP1 may be compromised in FBXL5-deficient cells as a result of increased oxidative stress (31, 36) or some other mechanism.

Nevertheless, although IRP1 and IRP2 are thought to bind many of the same mRNA targets in vivo and are thought to be largely redundant (16, 17, 22, 23, 37), simultaneous inactivation of the IRP1 gene product did not rescue the embryonic lethality in FXBL5-null mice (Table 3). If rescue of embryonic lethality upon IRP2 ablation were solely due to a reduction in total IRE-binding capacity, IRP1 inactivation might have been expected to result in similar compensatory changes given that IRP1 and IRP2 have comparable RNA binding capacities in both the mouse embryonic cells and duodenum. Although indicating that IRP1 and IRP2 have distinct physiological roles, these results cannot distinguish between possible underlying mechanisms including IRP2-selective IRE targets (38), differences in temporal and spatial expression patterns (Fig. 1), or differential IRP responsiveness in the context of stresses such as hypoxia (39).

In addition to the similar results observed upon global FBXL5 inactivation, Moroishi and colleagues (15) also constructed a mouse model in which FBXL5 was selectively ablated in the liver. Although viable, these mice exhibited both cell-autonomous effects, including hallmarks of liver damage, and systemic effects, consisting of increased serum iron levels likely due to decreased hepcidin expression in the liver. When challenged with a high iron diet, severe iron overload was restricted to the liver and proved fatal within a day (15). In this context, the distinct phenotype we observed with the heterozygous Fbxl5+/GT mice was of particular interest in at least two key respects: 1) the phenotype was manifested with a low iron diet and 2) the phenotype suggests that the intestine has distinct iron-sensing characteristics that may underlie a more privileged role in the maintenance of systemic iron homeostasis in response to iron deficiency than previously appreciated.

Fbxl5 heterozygosity had no observed effect on the behavior of most tissues we examined, including the liver, either from animals fed a low iron (5 ppm) or iron-sufficient (50 ppm) diet (Fig. 7B and supplemental Table S2). We also saw no difference in animals fed standard chow that contains excess iron (250 ppm, data not shown),5 although it remains possible that new phenotypes could emerge in the Fbxl5+/GT mice when challenged with supraphysiological dietary iron. Nevertheless, Fbxl5+/GT mice fed a low iron diet were more effective than their wild type littermates at absorbing iron and maintaining hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, despite no differences in the expression levels of traditional systemic regulators of iron mobilization (liver hepcidin) or erythropoiesis (renal erythropoietin) (supplemental Table S1). These systemic adaptations were mirrored by corresponding changes in gene expression within the duodenum, including increased induction of IRP2 protein levels, IRE-binding capacity, and DMT-1 expression (Fig. 7, A and C, and supplemental Table S1). TfR1 also contains IREs within its 3′ UTR (40) and likewise accumulates in the intestines of the Fbxl5+/GT mice fed the low iron diet (Fig. 7A and supplemental Table S1), although the relevance of this observation is unclear as TfR1 is not responsible for iron uptake from the lumen. Because IRP2 levels are normal in mice fed an iron-sufficient diet (Fig. 7A), there does not appear to be an overall diminished capacity for IRP degradation. Rather, the intestines of these heterozygotes are responding as though they were further iron-deficient than their wild type counterparts. Despite sharing this same FBXL5 iron-sensor, the iron “set point” of the duodenum appears distinct from most other tissues. Importantly, these characteristics were observed in mice having either isogenic (Table 5 and supplemental Fig. S3) or mixed genetic backgrounds.

Although the serum values in Table 4 reflect steady-state measurements, the flux measurements in Fig. 6 clearly show preferential targeting of serum iron to the erythron. It remains unclear as to whether the liver “refuses” iron or whether the erythron is more effective in its capture. Immature RBC have much higher TfR1 levels than hepatocytes (41), and it remains possible that iron homeostasis is also altered in erythropoietic tissues to further facilitate uptake of absorbed iron, although we detected no comparable changes in gene expression in the spleen (supplemental Tables S1 and S2).

These results validate an important physiological role for the iron-sensing FBXL5 protein in the regulation of IRPs and maintenance of both cellular and systemic iron homeostasis. Cells lacking FBXL5 expression fail to recognize their metabolic iron status and continuously accumulate toxic levels of bioavailable iron in an unregulated fashion. The damage incurred in iron-replete livers lacking FBXL5 suggests that it may be a genetic modifier of hemochromatosis (15). FBXL5 also plays a role in establishing IRP responsiveness even when iron is limiting, as revealed by the altered behavior of the duodenum in Fbxl5 heterozygotes. Because these mice maintain normal hematocrit and hemoglobin levels, a partial inhibition of FBXL5 expression may also have physiological benefits, as iron deficiency is the most common nutritional disorder worldwide (2). Last, as revealed upon FBXL5 depletion, the intestine has iron-responsive characteristics distinct from those of other tissues, conferring the capacity to influence systemic iron homeostasis in a previously unappreciated manner. It will be of great interest to investigate those responsible factors that work in conjunction with the FBXL5 iron sensor to establish the homeostatic iron set point in different cell types.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sean McCormick and Paul A. Lindahl for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis, Sandi Jo Estill, James Richardson, and the UTSW Molecular Pathology Core for assistance with the animal studies, C. Nizzi and N. Keuler for statistical analysis, and members of the Bruick lab for helpful advice. This investigation was conducted in a facility constructed with support from the Research Facilities Improvement Program Grant C06 RR 15437-01 from the National Center for Research Resources.

*This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants HL102481 (to R. K. B.), DK66600 (to R. S. E.), and GM084266 (to P. A. L.), a Career Award in the Biomedical Sciences from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (to R. K. B.), and Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant I-1568 (to R. K. B.).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is sbox.jpgThis article contains supplemental “Materials and Methods,” Tables S1–S4, and Figs. S1–S3.

4J. C. Ruiz and R. K. Bruick, unpublished results.

5J. C. Ruiz and R. K. Bruick, unpublished data.

3The abbreviations used are:

IRP
iron regulatory proteins
FbxL5
F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5
IRE
iron responsive element
TfR1
transferrin receptor 1
GT
gene trapping
DMT-1
divalent metal transporter-1
SCF
Skp1/Cul1/Rbx1.

REFERENCES

1. Camaschella C., Poggiali E. (2011) Inherited disorders of iron metabolism. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 23, 14–20 [PubMed]
2. Grosbois B., Decaux O., Cador B., Cazalets C., Jego P. (2005) Human iron deficiency. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. 189, 1649–1663; discussion 1663–1664 [PubMed]
3. Rouault T. A. (2006) The role of iron regulatory proteins in mammalian iron homeostasis and disease. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 406–414 [PubMed]
4. Hentze M. W., Muckenthaler M. U., Galy B., Camaschella C. (2010) Two to tango. Regulation of mammalian iron metabolism. Cell 142, 24–38 [PubMed]
5. Thomson A. M., Rogers J. T., Leedman P. J. (1999) Iron-regulatory proteins, iron-responsive elements and ferritin mRNA translation. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 1139–1152 [PubMed]
6. Koeller D. M., Casey J. L., Hentze M. W., Gerhardt E. M., Chan L. N., Klausner R. D., Harford J. B. (1989) A cytosolic protein binds to structural elements within the iron regulatory region of the transferrin receptor mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 3574–3578 [PubMed]
7. Guo B., Phillips J. D., Yu Y., Leibold E. A. (1995) Iron regulates the intracellular degradation of iron regulatory protein 2 by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21645–21651 [PubMed]
8. Salahudeen A. A., Thompson J. W., Ruiz J. C., Ma H. W., Kinch L. N., Li Q., Grishin N. V., Bruick R. K. (2009) An E3 ligase possessing an iron-responsive hemerythrin domain is a regulator of iron homeostasis. Science. 326, 722–726 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Vashisht A. A., Zumbrennen K. B., Huang X., Powers D. N., Durazo A., Sun D., Bhaskaran N., Persson A., Uhlen M., Sangfelt O., Spruck C., Leibold E. A., Wohlschlegel J. A. (2009) Control of iron homeostasis by an iron-regulated ubiquitin ligase. Science 326, 718–721 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Shu C., Sung M. W., Stewart M. D., Igumenova T. I., Tan X., Li P. (2012) The structural basis of iron sensing by the human F-box protein FBXL5. Chembiochem. 13, 788–791 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Thompson J. W., Salahudeen A. A., Chollangi S., Ruiz J. C., Brautigam C. A., Makris T. M., Lipscomb J. D., Tomchick D. R., Bruick R. K. (2012) Structural and molecular characterization of iron-sensing hemerythrin-like domain within F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 7357–7365 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Chollangi S., Thompson J. W., Ruiz J. C., Gardner K. H., Bruick R. K. (2012) Hemerythrin-like domain within F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (FBXL5) communicates cellular iron and oxygen availability by distinct mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 23710–23717 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Thompson J. W., Bruick R. K. (2012) Protein degradation and iron homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1823, 1484–1490 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Salahudeen A. A., Bruick R. K. (2009) Maintaining mammalian iron and oxygen homeostasis. Sensors, regulation, and cross-talk. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1177, 30–38 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Moroishi T., Nishiyama M., Takeda Y., Iwai K., Nakayama K. I. (2011) The FBXL5-IRP2 axis is integral to control of iron metabolism in vivo. Cell Metab. 14, 339–351 [PubMed]
16. Galy B., Ferring D., Hentze M. W. (2005) Generation of conditional alleles of the murine iron regulatory protein (IRP)-1 and -2 genes. Genesis 43, 181–188 [PubMed]
17. Galy B., Ferring D., Minana B., Bell O., Janser H. G., Muckenthaler M., Schümann K., Hentze M. W. (2005) Altered body iron distribution and microcytosis in mice deficient in iron regulatory protein 2 (IRP2). Blood 106, 2580–2589 [PubMed]
18. Lee J., Petris M. J., Thiele D. J. (2002) Characterization of mouse embryonic cells deficient in the Ctr1 high affinity copper transporter. Identification of a Ctr1-independent copper transport system. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 40253–40259 [PubMed]
19. Popescu B. F., Robinson C. A., Rajput A., Rajput A. H., Harder S. L., Nichol H. (2009) Iron, copper, and zinc distribution of the cerebellum. Cerebellum. 8, 74–79 [PubMed]
20. Guo B., Brown F. M., Phillips J. D., Yu Y., Leibold E. A. (1995) Characterization and expression of iron regulatory protein 2 (IRP2). Presence of multiple IRP2 transcripts regulated by intracellular iron levels. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16529–16535 [PubMed]
21. Galy B., Ferring D., Benesova M., Benes V., Hentze M. W. (2004) Targeted mutagenesis of the murine IRP1 and IRP2 genes reveals context-dependent RNA processing differences in vivo. RNA 10, 1019–1025 [PubMed]
22. LaVaute T., Smith S., Cooperman S., Iwai K., Land W., Meyron-Holtz E., Drake S. K., Miller G., Abu-Asab M., Tsokos M., Switzer R., 3rd, Grinberg A., Love P., Tresser N., Rouault T. A. (2001) Targeted deletion of the gene encoding iron regulatory protein-2 causes misregulation of iron metabolism and neurodegenerative disease in mice. Nat. Genet. 27, 209–214 [PubMed]
23. Meyron-Holtz E. G., Ghosh M. C., Iwai K., LaVaute T., Brazzolotto X., Berger U. V., Land W., Ollivierre-Wilson H., Grinberg A., Love P., Rouault T. A. (2004) Genetic ablations of iron regulatory proteins 1 and 2 reveal why iron regulatory protein 2 dominates iron homeostasis. EMBO J. 23, 386–395 [PubMed]
24. Ross K. L., Eisenstein R. S. (2002) Iron deficiency decreases mitochondrial aconitase abundance and citrate concentration without affecting tricarboxylic acid cycle capacity in rat liver. J. Nutr. 132, 643–651 [PubMed]
25. Galy B., Ferring-Appel D., Kaden S., Gröne H. J., Hentze M. W. (2008) Iron regulatory proteins are essential for intestinal function and control key iron absorption molecules in the duodenum. Cell Metab. 7, 79–85 [PubMed]
26. Mastrogiannaki M., Matak P., Keith B., Simon M. C., Vaulont S., Peyssonnaux C. (2009) HIF-2α, but not HIF-1α, promotes iron absorption in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 1159–1166 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Ganz T., Nemeth E. (2012) Hepcidin and iron homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1823, 1434–1443 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. De Domenico I., Ward D. M., Kaplan J. (2011) Hepcidin and ferroportin. The new players in iron metabolism. Semin. Liver Dis. 31, 272–279 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Ho M. S., Ou C., Chan Y. R., Chien C. T., Pi H. (2008) The utility F-box for protein destruction. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 65, 1977–2000 [PubMed]
30. Pantopoulos K. (2004) Iron metabolism and the IRE/IRP regulatory system. An update. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1012, 1–13 [PubMed]
31. Eisenstein R. S. (2000) Iron regulatory proteins and the molecular control of mammalian iron metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 20, 627–662 [PubMed]
32. Clarke S. L., Vasanthakumar A., Anderson S. A., Pondarré C., Koh C. M., Deck K. M., Pitula J. S., Epstein C. J., Fleming M. D., Eisenstein R. S. (2006) Iron-responsive degradation of iron-regulatory protein 1 does not require the Fe-S cluster. EMBO J. 25, 544–553 [PubMed]
33. Pantopoulos K., Gray N. K., Hentze M. W. (1995) Differential regulation of two related RNA-binding proteins, iron regulatory protein (IRP), and IRPB. RNA 1, 155–163 [PubMed]
34. Wang J., Fillebeen C., Chen G., Biederbick A., Lill R., Pantopoulos K. (2007) Iron-dependent degradation of apo-IRP1 by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 2423–2430 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Chen O. S., Schalinske K. L., Eisenstein R. S. (1997) Dietary iron intake modulates the activity of iron regulatory proteins and the abundance of ferritin and mitochondrial aconitase in rat liver. J. Nutr. 127, 238–248 [PubMed]
36. Mueller S., Pantopoulos K., Hübner C. A., Stremmel W., Hentze M. W. (2001) IRP1 activation by extracellular oxidative stress in the perfused rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23192–23196 [PubMed]
37. Smith S. R., Ghosh M. C., Ollivierre-Wilson H., Hang Tong W., Rouault T. A. (2006) Complete loss of iron regulatory proteins 1 and 2 prevents viability of murine zygotes beyond the blastocyst stage of embryonic development. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 36, 283–287 [PubMed]
38. Butt J., Kim H. Y., Basilion J. P., Cohen S., Iwai K., Philpott C. C., Altschul S., Klausner R. D., Rouault T. A. (1996) Differences in the RNA binding sites of iron regulatory proteins and potential target diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 4345–4439 [PubMed]
39. Schneider B. D., Leibold E. A. (2003) Effects of iron regulatory protein regulation on iron homeostasis during hypoxia. Blood 102, 3404–3411 [PubMed]
40. Leibold E. A., Guo B. (1992) Iron-dependent regulation of ferritin and transferrin receptor expression by the iron-responsive element binding protein. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 12, 345–368 [PubMed]
41. Ponka P., Lok C. N. (1999) The transferrin receptor: role in health and disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 1111–1137 [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology