Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jcinvestThe Journal of Clinical Investigation
J Clin Invest. 2012 December 3; 122(12): 4505–4518.
Published online 2012 November 12. doi:  10.1172/JCI63735
PMCID: PMC3533542

Cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality in Mob1a/1b double-mutant mice


Mps one binder 1a (MOB1A) and MOB1B are key components of the Hippo signaling pathway and are mutated or inactivated in many human cancers. Here we show that intact Mob1a or Mob1b is essential for murine embryogenesis and that loss of the remaining WT Mob1 allele in Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ or Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr mice results in tumor development. Because most of these cancers resembled trichilemmal carcinomas, we generated double-mutant mice bearing tamoxifen-inducible, keratinocyte-specific homozygous-null mutations of Mob1a and Mob1b (kDKO mice). kDKO mice showed hyperplastic keratinocyte progenitors and defective keratinocyte terminal differentiation and soon died of malnutrition. kDKO keratinocytes exhibited hyperproliferation, apoptotic resistance, impaired contact inhibition, enhanced progenitor self renewal, and increased centrosomes. Examination of Hippo pathway signaling in kDKO keratinocytes revealed that loss of Mob1a/b altered the activities of the downstream Hippo mediators LATS and YAP1. Similarly, YAP1 was activated in some human trichilemmal carcinomas, and some of these also exhibited MOB1A/1B inactivation. Our results clearly demonstrate that MOB1A and MOB1B have overlapping functions in skin homeostasis, and exert their roles as tumor suppressors by regulating downstream elements of the Hippo pathway.


Tissue homeostasis requires a balance of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. During tissue development, progenitor cells divide for a limited number of times before exiting the cell cycle and undergoing terminal differentiation (1). When progenitor cells proliferate inappropriately and/or undergo abnormal differentiation, cancer can result (2).

Skin is a tissue that begins as a single-layered epithelium made up of keratinocytes that later stratify and differentiate into hair follicles (HFs) or interfollicular epidermis (IFE). Disruption of signals balancing growth and differentiation in keratinocytes can initiate skin cancers. The most common skin cancer is basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the nodular subtype of which originates from HFs. Trichilemmal carcinomas are also HF-derived skin cancers, but are much more rare and show characteristic abnormalities of outer hair root sheath differentiation (3). Although impairment of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) intracellular signaling pathway is now well established as the cause of BCC (4, 5), the molecular mechanism underlying the development of trichilemmal carcinomas is unknown.

The evolutionarily conserved Hippo signaling pathway was first identified as regulating the cell proliferation and apoptosis-controlling organ size in Drosophila (6, 7). In mammals, the canonical Hippo pathway includes the following: Neurofibromin 2 (NF2) (8), the Mammalian STE20-like protein (MST) kinases (9), large tumor suppressor homolog (LATS) and Nuclear Dbf2-related (NDR) kinases (10), the adaptor proteins SAV1 (WW45) (11) and MOB (12), and their downstream transcriptional coactivators YAP1 and its paralog transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ, WWTR1) (13). All of these molecules (except YAP1 and TAZ) have been implicated as tumor suppressors. For example, mice deficient in Lats1 or Mst1/2 develop various cancers (14, 15), SAV1 and MOB are mutated in human cancer cell lines (16, 17), and Hippo components are reduced in human cancer samples (18). Homozygous-null mutant mice lacking Nf2, Mst1/2, Sav1, Lats2, or Yap1 are all embryonic lethal (15, 1922), precluding study of these mediators in tumorigenesis. To complicate matters, multiple homologs of each mammalian Hippo element exist, and a noncanonical Hippo pathway influences the localization and activity of canonical Hippo components (15, 23). Thus, the precise physiological functions of Hippo elements in mammals remain obscure.

MOB1 was originally shown in yeast to regulate mitotic exit and modulate cytokinesis (2429). In Drosophila, dMOB1 (MATS) overexpression is tumor suppressive, while loss of dMOB1 triggers tumor development (17). In humans, 7 MOB homologs (hMOB1A-B, 2A-C, 3, 4, where MOB indicates Mps one binder) have been identified (30), and hMOB1A (hMATS1, MOBKL1B) and hMOB1B (hMATS2, MOBKL1A) share 95% amino acid identity. Although no apparent functional domain has been found in hMOB1A/1B, only these 2 MOB proteins can bind to and activate LATS1/2 (31). In vitro, hMOB1A overexpression inhibits cell proliferation, while suppression of hMOB1B or hMOB1A mediated by shRNA or siRNA increases proliferation (30) or impairs mitotic exit (32), respectively. In vivo, the hMOB1A gene is mutated in melanoma and breast cancer cell lines, and its expression is downregulated in human colorectal and non–small-cell lung cancers (17, 33, 34). However, the normal function of hMOB1 proteins in vivo is unknown. To assess whether MOB1 is an important functional component of mammalian Hippo signaling and to determine whether MOB1 is truly a tumor suppressor in vivo, we generated and characterized double-mutant mice lacking Mob1a and Mob1b.


Embryonic lethality of Mob1a/1b-null mutant mice.

We first generated single-mutant mice bearing a null mutation of Mob1a (Mob1aΔ/Δ) or a trapped mutation of Mob1b (Mob1btr/tr) (Supplemental Figure 1, A–D; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI63735DS1) but no abnormalities were observed in morphology, body weight, histology, or life span (Supplemental Figure 1E and data not shown). We then attempted to generate double-homozygous–null mutant (Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/tr) mice, but no viable pups were obtained (Supplemental Table 1), indicating that complete loss of Mob1 is embryonic lethal. We next analyzed embryos from Mob1AΔ/+1btr/tr intercrosses at various time points during gestation. By E6.5, although decidua were formed, 28% of embryos were absorbed too severely to genotype (Figure (Figure1A1A and Table Table1).1). Thus, MOB1A and MOB1B have overlapping functions, and MOB1 is essential for postimplantation embryogenesis.

Figure 1
Loss of Mob1a/1b impairs mouse embryo survival.
Table 1
Viability of embryos of the indicated Mob1a genotypes from Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr intercrosses at the indicated stages of embryogenesis

To pinpoint the embryonic defect, we obtained individual blastocysts (E3.5) from Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr intercrosses and cultured them for 8 days. Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/tr blastocysts appeared normal at E3.5, but showed growth failure of the inner cell mass (ICM) by day 8 (Figure (Figure1B).1B). In contrast, the trophectoderm (TE) of Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/tr blastocysts developed normally.

To create conditional tamoxifen-inducible Mob1 mutants, we generated ERCreMob1afl/fl1btr/tr ES cells and established embryoid bodies (EBs) using the hanging drop method. Control and mutant EBs were cultured for 2 days with (or without) tamoxifen to delete Mob1 and then grown without leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) for 3–4 days. Quantitative RT-PCR examination showed that Gata4 and Pdgfra mRNAs (essential for primitive endoderm formation) were markedly suppressed in Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/tr EBs, whereas Cdx2 and Eomesodermin mRNAs (essential for TE) were only slightly inhibited (Figure (Figure1C).1C). Levels of Oct3/4 (Pou5f1) and Sall4 mRNAs (essential for ICM), as well as Nanog, Fgf5, Pax6, and Sox2 mRNAs (essential for primitive ectoderm), were normal in the double-mutant EBs. Immunostaining of double-mutant blastocysts with antibodies recognizing CDX2 or Troma-1 (TE markers), NANOG or SOX2 (primitive ectoderm markers), or Oct3/4 confirmed that the levels of these proteins were also normal in the absence of Mob1. However, levels of GATA4 and PDGFRA proteins (primitive endoderm markers) were greatly reduced in the mutants (Figure (Figure1D).1D). Moreover, YAP1, which is usually expressed only in the nuclei of TE cells, was abnormally activated and expressed in the nuclei of ICM cells (Figure (Figure1D).1D). Thus, Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/tr embryos have a defect in primitive endoderm formation.

Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice show increased susceptibility to tumorigenesis.

Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice were born alive and were healthy and fertile, but 52% of them had dental malocclusion (Supplemental Figure 2A). In addition, 25% of these heterozygotes exhibited disequilibrium due to disorganized inner ear hair bundles in the cochlear organ of Corti (Supplemental Figure 2B and Supplemental Video 1), and 31% showed histological evidence of increased trabeculae in femurs (Supplemental Figure 2C).

Because mutation or reduced expression of MOB1A occurs in cancer patients (33), we monitored tumorigenesis in Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr, Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+, and Mob1aΔ/+1btr/+ (control) mice over 70 weeks. Various tumor types arose spontaneously in 100% of Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice, but in only 4% of controls (Figure (Figure2,2, A and B, and Table Table2).2). Southern blotting confirmed the loss of the WT Mob1 allele in all tumors (Figure (Figure2C).2C). In most mutants, skin tumors in the form of facial swellings (Figure (Figure2A)2A) were observed. Benign exostosis in calvaria occurred in 92% of animals with just 1 WT Mob1 allele as well as extraskeletal osteosarcomas (24%), subcutaneous fibrosarcomas (or myofibrosarcomas) (22%), breast cancers (16%), lung cancers (5%), and salivary gland cancers (5%). Liver cancers were found only in Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mutants (50%). Interestingly, none of our Mob1-deficient mice developed colon tumors or melanomas, unlike MOB1A-deficient humans (17, 33). Nevertheless, MOB1 is a powerful tumor suppressor in multiple tissues in vivo.

Figure 2
Loss of Mob1a/1b promotes tumorigenesis.
Table 2
Total tumor numbers (incidence) for the mice in Figure 2A

Keratinocyte-specific Mob1a/1b-deficient mice show gross skin abnormalities and die during lactation.

Because the dominant tumor in Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice arose in the skin, we generated tamoxifen-inducible, keratinocyte-specific Mob1a/1b double-homozygous mutant mice (Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr). The Keratin-14 (Krt14) promotor directs gene expression in the basal layer of epidermal and follicular keratinocytes, including stem cells in the HF bulge. Thus, tamoxifen-induced, Krt14-controlled Cre-mediated deletion of a floxed gene disrupts expression of that gene throughout the IFE and HFs (35). When we administered tamoxifen to Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr mice at P1, we created double-homozygous conditional mutant mice [kDKO(P1)] that initially appeared healthy. Single-mutant mice (Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr) without tamoxifen or Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1b+/+ mice with tamoxifen were indistinguishable from the WT in gross appearance, histology, and survival (data not shown), allowing us to choose Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr mice without tamoxifen as controls. Southern blotting confirmed that tamoxifen disrupted the Mob1aflox allele in almost all keratinocytes of kDKO(P1) mice, leaving the Mob1aΔ allele (Supplemental Figure 3A). In addition, immunostaining using an Ab recognizing both MOB1A and MOB1B (Supplemental Figure 3B) confirmed that the MOB1A and MOB1B proteins are expressed both in IFE cells (especially in the granular layer) and in HF cells (especially in matrix cells and outer root sheath cells) in normal mice and humans (Supplemental Figure 3, C and D). In contrast, MOB1A and MOB1B proteins were not detected in the epidermis of kDKO(P1) mice (Supplemental Figure 3C).

By 13 days of age, kDKO(P1) mice were significantly smaller than control littermates and readily identified by their “wrinkled-bear” facial skin (Figure (Figure3A)3A) and ruffled hair (Figure (Figure3A).3A). These mutants’ front paws (Figure (Figure3A),3A), ears, and lips were hyperplastic and enlarged. All kDKO(P1) mice died of malnutrition within 10–30 days of birth (Figure (Figure3),3), likely due to dysphagia caused by hyperplasia of the oral cavity epithelium.

Figure 3
Characterization of keratinocyte-specific Mob1a/1b double-homozygous mutant mice.

We next analyzed the architecture of kDKO(P1) skin at various time points after birth. In WT mice, dividing keratinocytes are restricted to the basal epidermal layer. As these cells exit the cell cycle, they differentiate to form the spinous and granular skin layers as well as the dead, enucleated stratum corneum layers. The anagen phase of hair development thickens the skin until day 17, when the first catagen phase is triggered and skin thickness regresses until day 19. Hair remodeling then begins its lifelong cycle of spontaneous regrowth and regression (36). We saw this pattern clearly in our biopsy series from control mice (Supplemental Figure 4). However, the IFE and HFs of kDKO(P1) mice showed hyperplastic multilayered epithelium at day 16 (Figure (Figure3B),3B), and impaired epidermal regression during catagen (Supplemental Figure 4; day 19). In addition, parakeratosis (reduced enucleation) was evident in the stratum corneum layer of kDKO(P1) mice (Figure (Figure33C).

To investigate keratinocyte differentiation, we used immunostaining to detect keratin markers in the fat pad epidermis, which allows easy analysis of epidermal layers. Keratin-15+ (KRT15+) cells, the most primitive in IFE, normally form a single basal layer attached to the IFE basement membrane (BM). This configuration was clearly visible in our controls, whereas the KRT15+ cells of kDKO(P1) mice, although nearly normal in number, were scattered inside the IFE without attachment to the BM (Figure (Figure3D).3D). In control mice, KRT14+ and KRT5+cells were present in 1 or 2 IFE layers (as expected), but appeared in multiple layers in kDKO(P1) mice (Figure (Figure3D).3D). Moreover, there were increased numbers of irregularly organized KRT10+ cells in the suprabasal layers of kDKO(P1) epidermis (Figure (Figure3D).3D). Filaggrin+ cells, the most highly differentiated keratinocytes, were present in kDKO(P1) epidermis but at a reduced percentage (Figure (Figure3D).3D). Similar IFE alterations were observed in the back skin of kDKO(P1) mice (Figure (Figure3E3E and Supplemental Figure 5). KRT17+ outer root sheath cells were significantly increased in back skin HFs of kDKO(P1) mice, and Trichohyalin+ inner root sheath cells were elevated slightly (Figure (Figure3E).3E). Thus, the phenotype of kDKO(P1) mice may be largely due to abnormal expansion of immature stem/progenitor skin cells.

To try to overcome the early lethality of kDKO(P1) mice, we waited until kDKO mice reached 28 days of age before treating them with tamoxifen for 7 days. However, like kDKO(P1) mice, all of these kDKO(P28) mice showed keratinocyte hyperplasia (Figure (Figure3F)3F) and died within 15–55 days after treatment (Supplemental Figure 6). Thus, MOB1 deficiency in epidermal cells severely disrupts normal IFE and HF development and homeostasis.

Tumorigenic anomalies in Mob1a/1b double-homozygous mutant keratinocytes.

To determine whether loss of MOB1 conferred tumorigenic properties on keratinocytes, we first immunostained kDKO(P1) skin with anti-Ki67 Ab and found increased numbers of Ki67+ proliferating epithelial cells (Figure (Figure4A).4A). In control mice at P13, a few Ki67+ cells were located among basal IFE cells and outer root sheath cells, with more scattered among HF matrix cells. However, the incidence of Ki67+ cells in kDKO(P1) skin at P13 was 1.5 times higher than in controls, and Ki67+ cells were also found in the suprabasal layers normally quiescent in control epidermis. In addition, TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells were reduced in kDKO(P1) epidermis (Figure (Figure4B).4B). Thus, increased proliferation and repressed apoptosis may contribute to kDKO(P1) epidermal hyperplasia. Cell-plating studies revealed that the saturation density of kDKO(P1) keratinocytes was also increased (Figure (Figure4C).4C). Because the cell size (forward scatter) of control and mutant keratinocytes showed no difference by FACS analysis (data not shown), the increased saturation density of the mutant suggests impaired contact inhibition. Histological analysis confirmed that the mutant basal epidermal layer showed significantly increased cell density (control: 7.6 ± 0.36 nuclei per 50 μm BM; mutant: 8.9 ± 0.38 nuclei per 50 μm BM; n = 5; P < 0.05). Morphologically, mutant basal cells were elongated and columnar rather than round like control basal cells (Figure (Figure4D),4D), also indicating defective contact inhibition.

Figure 4
Tumorigenic anomalies in Mob1a/1b double-homozygous mutant keratinocytes.

Because yeast MOB1 regulates mitotic exit and cytokinesis (2429), we speculated that mammalian MOB1 might affect processes that support cell division. Indirect immunofluorescence analysis of control and kDKO(P1) keratinocytes using anti–γ-tubulin and anti–α-tubulin Abs revealed an increase in centrosome number (>2 centrosomes/cell) (Figure (Figure4E).4E). Aberrant centrosome numbers are associated with multipolar spindle formation that impairs chromosome segregation. Indeed, a greater percentage of kDKO(P1) keratinocytes exhibited multi-polar spindles (Figure (Figure4F).4F). Micronuclei, which are cytoplasmic chromosomal fragments generated by aberrant mitosis, were also increased in kDKO(P1) keratinocytes (Figure (Figure4G).4G). Similar defects were observed in Mob1a and Mob1b double-homozygous mutant embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Supplemental Figure 7, A–C).

To determine which mitotic stage was altered in kDKO(P1) keratinocytes, we divided the mitotic process into 4 parts based on cell morphology: part I, cells progressing from the round morphology of a resting cell to chromosome alignment (corresponding to prometaphase); part II, from chromosome alignment to ingression of the cleavage furrow (metaphase/late anaphase); part III, from ingression to furrow completion (late anaphase/telophase); and part IV, from furrow completion to cell division (cytokinesis). We used time-lapse video microscopy to measure the duration of each of parts I–IV in control and kDKO(P1) keratinocytes. Part IV was significantly accelerated in MOB1-deficient cells compared with controls, while part I was slightly faster in the mutant (Supplemental Figure 8, A and B). No significant differences were detected for parts II and III. Thus, loss of MOB1 accelerates a cell’s exit from mitosis.

We noted that kDKO(P1) mice had an apparent increase in the number of skin progenitors in the IFE (Figure (Figure3D).3D). We therefore performed RT-PCR to evaluate stem/progenitor cells in the HFs. CD34+ and LGR6+ cells are the most immature HF stem cells located in the bulge and isthmus. We found that Cd34 and Lgr6 mRNAs were normal or reduced in kDKO(P1) keratinocytes, but that markers of activated stem/progenitor cells, such as Sox9 and Lgr5, were elevated (Figure (Figure4H).4H). These findings were confirmed by FACS analysis and immunohistochemistry (Figure (Figure4H).4H). However, despite their normal numbers, CD34+ cells in mutant HFs could not localize to the proper bulge area (Supplemental Figure 9). This result mirrors the failure of HF stem cells to localize to the basal cell layer in MOB1-deficient IFE and HFs (Figure (Figure3D).3D). In addition, SOX9+ cells (which are normally located in the bulge at P21) were markedly increased among kDKO(P1) keratinocytes and scattered throughout the HFs (Figure (Figure4H).4H). To determine how MOB1 inactivation affected HF stem cell self renewal, we quantified the ability of the total kDKO(P1) keratinocyte population to form colonies in culture. A lack of MOB1 induced a 2.1-fold increase in colony-forming efficiency (Figure (Figure4I).4I). When these primary colonies were replated to test their ability to form secondary colonies, a 3.0-fold increase in secondary colony-forming efficiency was observed in the absence of MOB1 (Figure (Figure4I).4I). Thus, MOB1 inactivation enhances the self renewal of activated stem/progenitor keratinocytes. This property, along with hyperproliferation, apoptotic resistance, impaired contact inhibition, increased centrosome number, and accelerated mitotic exit, may account for the frequent cancers observed in Mob1-deficient mice.

MOB1-mediated regulation of the LATS1/2-YAP1 pathway controls skin homeostasis.

To characterize the mechanisms driving the kDKO(P1) phenotype, we investigated the effects of MOB1 loss on signaling mediated by YAP1 and its upstream kinases LATS1/2. In vitro, MOB1 is important for the full activation of LATS kinases (37), and activated LATS1/2 phosphorylate YAP1 and inhibit its nuclear localization (38). Using immunohistochemistry, we found that, in control mice, YAP1 was localized in the nuclei of most outer root sheath cells, in some HF matrix cells, and in some IFE basal cells (Figure (Figure5A).5A). However, kDKO(P1) mice exhibited not only greater numbers of nuclear YAP1+ cells in these sites but also some nuclear YAP1+ cells in the upper IFE layer (Figure (Figure5A).5A). Immunoblotting of keratinocytes confirmed that the phosphorylation of YAP1 on Ser127 was reduced, but that total YAP1 was increased in the absence of MOB1 (Figure (Figure5B),5B), especially in the nucleus (Figure (Figure5C).5C). When we cultured keratinocytes under high cell density conditions, YAP1 was inactivated and localized in the cytoplasm in control cells (Figure (Figure5D).5D). In contrast, in kDKO(P1) keratinocytes, YAP1 remained activated and positioned in the nucleus even at high-cell density (Figure (Figure5D).5D). Thus, MOB1 is required for density-induced subcellular localization of YAP1.

Figure 5
MOB1-mediated regulation of the LATS1/2-YAP1 pathway controls skin homeostasis.

We next investigated LATS1/2 phosphorylation in control and mutant keratinocytes. Immunoblotting demonstrated that, in the absence of any stimulation, levels of phospho-LATS1(T1079) and phospho-LATS2(T1041) were below the assay detection limit even in control keratinocytes (Figure (Figure5E).5E). We then stimulated control and kDKO(P1) keratinocytes with okadaic acid (OA), which activates the MST kinases acting upstream of LATS1/2 (39). While OA-stimulated control keratinocytes showed vigorous phosphorylation of LATS1/2, OA-stimulated kDKO(P1) keratinocytes did not. Strikingly, total LATS1/2 protein levels were also reduced in the mutant. This inhibition of LATS1/2 phosphorylation was not due solely to the reduction in total LATS1/2 proteins because levels of phospho-LATS1/2 were also markedly decreased when total LATS1/2 protein levels in each sample were adjusted to equality prior to electrophoresis (Figure (Figure5E).5E). These data show that MOB1 regulates LATS1/2-YAP1 signaling essential for mammalian skin homeostasis.

MOB1 is involved in the onset of malignant outer root sheath tumors resembling trichilemmal carcinomas.

Microscopic analysis of the skin tumors of Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ and Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr mice revealed lesions consisting of invasive epithelial lobules with atypical cytology, an increased number of mitotic cells, and horn cysts (Figure (Figure6A).6A). Trichilemmal keratinization and continuity with the follicular epithelium (Figure (Figure6A)6A) were focally evident. Because these features are characteristic of trichilemmal carcinomas of outer root sheath origin, we immunostained these tumors with Abs recognizing KRT17, KRT5, KRT15, KRT10, Trichohyalin, or AE13. All tumors were positive for KRT17 (outer root sheath marker), KRT5 (basal cells and outer root sheath), and KRT15 (basal cells, outer root sheath, and bulge), but negative for KRT10 (upper basal IFE) and Trichohyalin (inner root sheath) (Figure (Figure6B).6B). Some tumors were also positive for AE13 (hair shaft marker), confirming that these malignancies were derived from the HF outer root sheath. Thus, deficiency for the Hippo signaling element MOB1 in mice leads to tumors with the features of trichilemmal carcinomas.

Figure 6
Characterization of skin cancers of Mob1-deficient mice and human trichilemmal carcinomas.

In humans, the most common HF-derived carcinomas are nodular BCCs, which are driven by hyperactivated SHH signaling (5). However, immunoblotting of our MOB1-deficient keratinocytes showed that neither GLI2 (downstream effector in the SHH pathway) nor the LEF1 or HES1 proteins important for HF morphogenesis were elevated (Figure (Figure6C).6C). In addition, while AKT was not activated in the mutant keratinocytes, phospho-ERK was increased (Figure (Figure6C).6C). To rule out the involvement of the SHH pathway in tumorigenesis linked to MOB1 deficiency, we immunostained control and mutant keratinocytes with Abs validated to detect GLI2 or GLI1 (Supplemental Figure 10, A and B) in patterns consistent with a previous report (40). However, when we immunostained control and kDKO(P1) keratinocytes with these Abs, no differences were detected (Figure (Figure6D6D and Supplemental Figure 10C). Furthermore, GLI2 levels in 4 trichilemmal carcinoma samples from kDKO (P1) mice were not obviously increased compared with GLI2 levels in cultured control keratinocytes (Figure (Figure6E).6E). Thus, the SHH pathway involved in nodular BCCs does not appear to be driving the development of the trichilemmal carcinomas arising in the absence of MOB1A/1B.

In humans, trichilemmal carcinomas are very rare and composed mainly of basaloid and squamous cells, with some clear cells (Figure (Figure6F).6F). We performed immunostaining to detect YAP1 in samples of 14 human trichilemmal carcinomas with accompanying noncancerous epidermis. We found that, in noncancerous skin, YAP1 was expressed in the nuclei of IFE basal cells and HF outer root sheath cells (Figure (Figure6G).6G). Strikingly, a significant proportion (11/14, 79%) of trichilemmal carcinomas showed an increase in total YAP1+ cells (Figure (Figure6G6G and Table Table3).3). Almost as many (10/14, 71%) trichilemmal carcinomas exhibited elevated nuclear YAP1 within the tumor mass (Figure (Figure6G6G and Table Table3).3). In addition, when immunostained to detect MOB1A/1B, half of trichilemmal carcinomas examined (5/10, 50%) showed decreased MOB1A/1B expression (Figure (Figure6G6G and Table Table3).3). Moreover, 10/10 (100%) of these cases in which MOB1 was decreased displayed elevated nuclear YAP1 within the tumor. These data support our hypothesis that it is the mammalian Hippo pathway, rather than the SHH pathway, that is involved in the onset of non-BCC follicular cancers such as trichilemmal carcinomas.

Table 3
Quantitation of human trichilemmal carcinoma samples showing an increase in YAP1+ cells and/or elevation in nuclear YAP1, and a decrease in MOB1A/1B


We have demonstrated that mice completely deficient for Mob1 have the most severe phenotype among strains lacking a Hippo signaling component. Mob1a/1b double-homozygous–null mutant mice die at gastrulation, much earlier than mice lacking Mst1/2 (15), Lats2 (21), Lats1 (14), Sav1 (20), or Nf2 (19). Our data further indicate that MOB1 is essential for embryogenesis and that functions of MOB1A and MOB1B overlap. In addition, the tumor spectrum observed in heterozygous Mob1-deficient mice is the broadest among mutants lacking Hippo components. These findings suggest both that MOB1 is the key molecule in the Hippo signaling pathway and that MOB1 may have molecular target(s) other than the Hippo pathway. This notion is consistent with the reduced expression or mutation of MOB1 frequently observed in a variety of human cancers (17, 33, 34), and with MOB1’s reported binding to a range of molecules, including TSSC1, NUP98, HDAC3, and DIPA (CCDD85B) (41, 42). Our results also imply that MOB1A may be more important than MOB1B, at least for embryogenesis and liver homeostasis, because Mob1b heterozygotes lacking Mob1a show partial embryonic lethality (Supplemental Table 1) and develop liver cancers (Table (Table2),2), whereas Mob1a heterozygotes lacking Mob1b are all viable and free of liver tumors.

The lethality of Mob1-deficient mice may stem from their failure to form primitive endoderm. The endodermal markers Pdgfra and Gata4 were markedly reduced in Mob1-deficient cells, whereas the primitive ectoderm markers Nanog, Sox2, Fgf5, and Pax6 were normal. Our mutant showed abnormal YAP1 activation, and activated YAP1 normally activates the transcription factor TEAD2. TEAD2 regulates primitive endoderm-specific genes such that sustained inhibition of TEAD2 enhances primitive endoderm-specific gene expression (43). YAP1 and TEADS reportedly increase the expression of pluripotency genes such as Oct3/4 and Sox2 (43, 44), as well as the trophoblast gene Cdx2 (45, 46). However, levels of Oct3/4, SOX2, and CDX2 proteins were normal in our Mob1-deficient embryos. Thus, although we found YAP1 to be activated in the mutant ICM, a much stronger alteration of YAP1 activity may be necessary to induce a detectable effect on these genes.

We have shown that, in contrast to MST1/2 and LATS1/2, MOB1 is a potent tumor suppressor in a range of tissue types that includes the skin. All cancers examined in Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice had lost the WT Mob1 allele, suggesting increased genetic instability. Mob1a/1b mRNAs and proteins are frequently cosuppressed in tumor cell lines (data not shown), and the MOB1A and MOB1B amino acid sequences are 95% identical. We are currently clarifying whether a common mechanism regulates these 2 genes.

In our Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr and Mob1aΔ/Δ1btr/+ mice, the most frequent tumors were malignant outer root sheath tumors resembling trichilemmal carcinomas (Figure (Figure6A).6A). Histologically, these malignancies were not BCCs because they lacked the cellular palisading typical of BCCs (4). Moreover, cultured Mob1a/1b double-mutant keratinocytes did not show the SHH pathway activation important for BCC onset (Figure (Figure6C).6C). Benign trichilemmomas are frequently observed in Cowden disease patients with hereditary PTEN mutations (47), but these tumors seldom become malignant. The trichilemmal growths in our Mob1-deficient mutants were clearly cancerous but showed no activation of the PTEN effector AKT (Figure (Figure6C).6C). Importantly, like our mutant mouse tissues, our human trichilemmal carcinoma samples exhibited frequent MOB1A/1B inactivation and YAP1 activation (Figure (Figure6G6G and Table Table3).3). These findings suggest that impaired Hippo signaling may drive trichilemmal carcinoma onset in humans.

Mob1-deficient keratinocytes exhibit enhanced proliferation, apoptotic resistance, impaired contact inhibition, increased centrosomes, accelerated mitotic exit, and enhanced progenitor self-renewal. In addition, polarity must be defective without MOB1 because (a) KRT15+ cells were scattered inside the IFE and not localized to the basal layer; (b) CD34+ bulge stem cells were not localized in the bulge; and (c) hair bundles in the organ of Corti were disorganized (Supplemental Figure 2B). To date, 2 transgenic mouse strains overexpressing Yap1 in the skin have been described (23, 48). Like our Mob1 mutants, Yap1 transgenic mice show hyperplastic IFE. However, these latter animals also have a severe defect in HF formation. This difference may account for the development of IFE-derived squamous cell carcinomas in Yap1 transgenic mice, but HF-derived trichilemmal carcinomas in Mob1-deficient mutants.

At the biochemical level, Mob1-deficient keratinocytes exhibited reductions in not only phospho-LATS1/2, but also total LATS1/2 proteins. Lats1/2 mRNAs were comparable in control and mutant keratinocytes (data not shown), indicating that this surprising decrease in LATS1/2 proteins occurs posttranscriptionally. Like MOB1, SAV1 is a scaffolding protein in the Hippo pathway, but unlike Mob1 deficiency, Sav1 deficiency decreases phospho-MST, but does not affect total MST or LATS1/2 proteins (20). Another interesting biochemical observation was the activation of ERK in our Mob1-deficient keratinocytes: no connection between MOB1 and ERK has been reported to date. With respect to Hippo signaling, ERK can be activated by YAP1 (49) or suppressed by NF2 (50) or MST2 (51). Since NF2 and phospho-MST1/2 were not decreased in our Mob1-deficient keratinocytes (data not shown), we speculate that the increased YAP1 in these cells may have triggered their abnormal ERK activation.

Because all of our Mob1a/1b-deficient mice spontaneously developed tumors (and especially trichilemmal carcinomas), we believe that the loss of MOB1A/1B helps to both initiate and promote carcinoma onset. With respect to tumor initiation, the observed increase in the number of centrosomes and/or micronuclei in our mutant cells may have introduced detrimental alterations into their DNA. With respect to cancer promotion, the enhanced proliferation, apoptotic resistance, impaired contact inhibition, and increased progenitor self renewal associated with loss of MOB1A/1Bmay support the growth and progression of cells that have undergone tumor initiation events.

The very rare occurrence of trichilemmal carcinomas in humans has slowed the identification of genes involved in their development. Expression levels of MOB1A, LATS1/2, and SAV1 are more frequently reduced in the advanced stages of colon (33), breast (52), and renal cancers (53) than in the early stages of these malignancies. In lung cancers, the reverse is true, since MOB1A levels are frequently lower in the early pT1 stage of non–small-cell lung cancer as compared with later stages (34). These observations suggest that the loss of Hippo signaling molecules can be an important driver of cancer progression in humans. Further study of alterations to gene or protein expression or functions of Hippo signaling components in a broad range of human malignancies may increase our understanding of their involvement in tumorigenesis.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that (a) MOB1 is a broadly-acting tumor suppressor in mice and (b) Hippo signaling drives trichilemmal carcinoma onset in the skin. Therapeutic strategies to control Hippo signaling or MOB1 expression might therefore benefit many cancer patients, particularly those with HF-derived cancers.


Generation of Mob1aflox and Mob1btrap mice.

A conditional targeting vector based on the Cre-loxP system was constructed to delete a genomic fragment containing exon 2 of the murine Mob1a gene (Supplemental Figure 1). This deletion generates a frame shift and early stop codon in exon 3. We introduced 1 loxP site into Mob1a intron 1 and 2 loxP sites into intron 2 to flank Mob1a exon 2. The PGK-Hyg resistance cassette was inserted in antisense orientation between the 2 loxP sites in intron 2. The resulting targeting vector was electroporated into E14K ES cells, and homologous recombinants were confirmed by Southern blotting using 5′ flanking probe A and a Hyg-specific probe. Correctly targeted Mob1a mutant clones were transiently transfected with pMC1-Cre (54) to delete the loxP-flanked Hygr gene. Progeny clones sensitive to hygromycin were subjected to Southern blotting to identify those retaining exon 2 flanked by 2 loxP sites (the Mob1aflox allele) and those lacking exon 2 (Mob1aΔ allele; equivalent to a knockout mutation). For Mob1b-deficient mice, an ES cell line bearing a gene trap mutation of intron 2 of the Mob1b gene was obtained from the Sanger Institute (Hinxton, United Kingdom). The single integration of the trapped site was confirmed by PCR and genomic Southern blotting using 5′ flanking probe C and a neospecific probe. Mob1aflox, Mob1aΔ, and Mob1btrap mice were generated from ES cell clones using standard procedures and backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice 3 times before intercrossing to generate Mob1afl/fl, Mob1aΔ/Δ, and Mob1btr/tr progeny. Primers used for genotyping are listed in Supplemental Table 2.

In vitro culture of preimplantation embryos.

E3.5 embryos derived from the intercrossing of Mob1aΔ/+1btr/tr males and females were analyzed as described (55). Briefly, blastocysts were individually cultured in 24-well plates in ES cell medium without LIF and photographed every 24 hours. On day 8, the morphology of each embryo was recorded and its genotype determined by PCR.

Embryo immunostaining.

Immunofluorescent staining of embryos was performed as described (45). Briefly, embryos (E3.5) were cultured overnight prior to fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde. Fixed tissues were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, blocked with 2% goat serum, and incubated overnight at 4°C with Abs recognizing CDX2 (Biocare Medical), Oct3/4 (gift of H. Niwa, Riken), PDGFRα (eBiosciences), GATA4/6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), NANOG (ReproCELL), Troma-1 (DSHB), SOX2 (Abcam), or YAP1 (Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary Abs were Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit or Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were visualized using DAPI (Dojindo). Stained embryos were examined by confocal microscopy.

Generation and differentiation of Mob1a/1b double-mutant ES cells.

ES cells established from embryos derived from Mob1afl/fl1btr/tr intercrosses were transfected with linearized CMV-Mer-Cre-Mer plasmid DNA (56) plus pApuro2 (57). To generate ERCreMob1afl/fl1btr/tr ES clones, ES cells were selected by culture for 12 days in complete ES cell medium containing 1 μg/ml puromycin (Invivogen) on an irradiation-inactivated Puro MEF feeder layer. Tamoxifen (3.3 μM; Toronto Research Chemicals) was added (or not) for 2 days to completely delete the Mob1a gene (data not shown). Control and mutant EBs were generated from hanging drops of approximately 1,000 ES cells/20 μl medium as described (58).

Generation of keratinocyte-specific Mob1a/Mob1b double-mutant mice.

Mob1afl/fl1btr/tr mice were mated to Krt14CreER transgenic mice (35) in which Cre can be activated by tamoxifen under the control of the Krt14 promoter. Offspring carrying Krt14CreER plus 2 copies of the floxed Mob1a allele (Mob1afl/fl) and 2 copies of the trapped Mob1b allele (Mob1btr/tr) were administered tamoxifen and used in the analysis as homozygous double mutant (Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr +tamoxifen; kDKO) mice. Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr mice without tamoxifen and Mob1a+/+1btr/tr or Mob1a+/+Mob1btr/tr mice with tamoxifen but without Krt14CreER were indistinguishable in pilot experiments examining histology and MOB1 protein levels. Krt14CreERMob1afl/fl1btr/tr mice without tamoxifen were arbitrarily chosen to serve as controls. To induce Cre in keratinocyte stem/progenitor cells, P1 mice were intraperitoneally administered 0.2 mg tamoxifen on that one day, or P28 mice received 0.5 mg tamoxifen each day for 7 days starting on P28.

Characterization of primary keratinocytes.

Primary keratinocytes isolated from control and kDKO mice were cultured as described (59). For cell saturation density assays, keratinocytes at passage 2 were seeded in type I collagen–coated 24-well plates (0.3 × 105/well) and cultured for up to 12 days before counting cell numbers. For colony-forming assays, keratinocytes at passage 1 were seeded in 6-well plates (0.4 × 104/well). After 2 weeks, half the wells were fixed and stained with Giemsa (Muto Pure Chemicals), and the number of primary colonies was counted. Keratinocytes of an unfixed well were then trypsinized and reseeded so that each well of a 6-well plate received cells from 1 primary colony. Reseeded cells were cultured for 2 weeks to generate secondary colonies.

Clinical samples.

Surgically obtained trichilemmal carcinoma samples containing noncancerous tissues were acquired from the Department of Regenerative Dermatology (Osaka University). Resected cancer tissues were fixed in formalin and stained with anti-YAP1 Ab (Cell Signaling) and anti-MOB1A/1B Ab (AP7031b; Abgent) using a standard protocol.


KaleidaGraph software was used for statistical analyses. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, and P values were determined using the 2-tailed Student’s t test unless otherwise stated. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval.

The clinical sample study design was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Osaka University, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiment Review Boards of Kyushu University and Akita University.

See Supplemental Methods for additional details.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data:
Supplemental video 1:


We are grateful to S. Kuroda, Y. Horie, M. Natsui, H. Takahashi, and K. Enomoto (all of Akita University); to M. Fukumoto (of Tohoku University); to H. Konishi, A. Fujimoto, M. Suzuki, C. Meno, and Y. Oda (all of Kyushu University); and to K. Katsuoka (of Kitasato University) for expert technical support and helpful discussions. In addition, we thank B. Vanhaesebroeck (Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom) for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan (MEXT); the Cooperative Research Project Program of the Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University; the Uehara Memorial Foundation; the Takeda Medical Foundation; the Naito Foundation; the Sumitomo Foundation; the Ono Medical Research Foundation; the Yasuda Medical Foundation; the Cosmetology Research Foundation; the Osaka Cancer Research Foundation; the Fukuoka Foundation for Sound Health; and the Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders.


Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(12):4505–4518. doi:10.1172/JCI63735.


1. Blanpain C, Horsley V, Fuchs E. Epithelial stem cells: turning over new leaves. Cell. 2007;128(3):445–458. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.014. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414(6859):105–111. doi: 10.1038/35102167. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Headington JT. Tumors of the hair follicle. A review. Am J Pathol. 1976;85(2):479–514. [PubMed]
4. Fan H, Oro AE, Scott MP, Khavari PA. Induction of basal cell carcinoma features in transgenic human skin expressing Sonic Hedgehog. Nat Med. 1997;3(7):788–792. [PubMed]
5. Oro AE, Higgins KM, Hu Z, Bonifas JM, Epstein EH, Jr, Scott MP. Basal cell carcinomas in mice overexpressing sonic hedgehog. Science. 1997;276(5313):817–821. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.817. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Edgar BA. From cell structure to transcription: Hippo forges a new path. Cell. 2006;124(2):267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Harvey K, Tapon N. The Salvador-Warts-Hippo pathway — an emerging tumour — suppressor network. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(3):182–191. doi: 10.1038/nrc2070. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Hamaratoglu F, et al. The tumour-suppressor genes NF2/Merlin and expanded act through Hippo signalling to regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(1):27–36. doi: 10.1038/ncb1339. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Creasy CL, Chernoff J. Cloning and characterization of a human protein kinase with homology to Ste20. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(37):21695–21700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.37.21695. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Tao W, et al. Human homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster lats tumour suppressor modulates CDC2 activity. Nat Genet. 1999;21(2):177–181. doi: 10.1038/5960. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Valverde P. Cloning, expression, and mapping of hWW45, a novel human WW domain-containing gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276(3):990–998. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3582. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Moreno CS, Lane WS, Pallas DC. A mammalian homolog of yeast MOB1 is both a member and a putative substrate of striatin family-protein phosphatase 2A complexes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(26):24253–24260. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102398200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Sudol M, et al. Characterization of the mammalian YAP (Yes-associated protein) gene and its role in defining a novel protein module, the WW domain. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(24):14733–14741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.24.14733. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. St John MA, et al. Mice deficient of Lats1 develop soft-tissue sarcomas, ovarian tumours and pituitary dysfunction. Nat Genet. 1999;21(2):182–186. doi: 10.1038/5965. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Zhou D, et al. Mst1 and Mst2 maintain hepatocyte quiescence and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma development through inactivation of the Yap1 oncogene. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(5):425–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.026. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Tapon N, et al. Salvador promotes both cell cycle exit and apoptosis in Drosophila and is mutated in human cancer cell lines. Cell. 2002;110(4):467–478. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00824-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Lai ZC, et al. Control of cell proliferation and apoptosis by mob as tumor suppressor, mats. Cell. 2005;120(5):675–685. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.036. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010;19(4):491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. McClatchey AI, Saotome I, Ramesh V, Gusella JF, Jacks T. The Nf2 tumor suppressor gene product is essential for extraembryonic development immediately prior to gastrulation. Genes Dev. 1997;11(10):1253–1265. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.10.1253. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Lee JH, et al. A crucial role of WW45 in developing epithelial tissues in the mouse. EMBO J. 2008;27(8):1231–1242. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.63. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. McPherson JP, et al. Lats2/Kpm is required for embryonic development, proliferation control and genomic integrity. EMBO J. 2004;23(18):3677–3688. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600371. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Morin-Kensicki EM, et al. Defects in yolk sac vasculogenesis, chorioallantoic fusion, and embryonic axis elongation in mice with targeted disruption of Yap65. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(1):77–87. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.77-87.2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Schlegelmilch K, et al. Yap1 acts downstream of alpha-catenin to control epidermal proliferation. Cell. 2011;144(5):782–795. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.031. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Luca FC, Winey M. MOB1, an essential yeast gene required for completion of mitosis and maintenance of ploidy. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9(1):29–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Luca FC, Mody M, Kurischko C, Roof DM, Giddings TH, Winey M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mob1p is required for cytokinesis and mitotic exit. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21(20):6972–6983. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.20.6972-6983.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Bardin AJ, Amon A. Men and sin: what’s the difference? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(11):815–826. doi: 10.1038/35099020. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Yoshida S, Toh-e A. Regulation of the localization of Dbf2 and mob1 during cell division of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Genet Syst. 2001;76(2):141–147. doi: 10.1266/ggs.76.141. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Mah AS, Jang J, Deshaies RJ. Protein kinase Cdc15 activates the Dbf2-Mob1 kinase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(13):7325–7330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.141098998. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Hergovich A, Hemmings BA. Hippo signalling in the G2/M cell cycle phase: Lessons learned from the yeast MEN and SIN pathways. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23(7):794–802. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Chow A, Hao Y, Yang X. Molecular characterization of human homologs of yeast MOB1. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(9):2079–2089. [PubMed]
31. Stavridi ES, et al. Crystal structure of a human Mob1 protein: toward understanding Mob-regulated cell cycle pathways. Structure. 2003;11(9):1163–1170. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00182-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Bothos J, Tuttle RL, Ottey M, Luca FC, Halazonetis TD. Human LATS1 is a mitotic exit network kinase. Cancer Res. 2005;65(15):6568–6575. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0862. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Kosaka Y, Mimori K, Tanaka F, Inoue H, Watanabe M, Mori M. Clinical significance of the loss of MATS1 mRNA expression in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2007;31(2):333–338. [PubMed]
34. Sasaki H, et al. Human MOB1 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2007;8(4):273–276. doi: 10.3816/CLC.2007.n.006. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
35. Vasioukhin V, Degenstein L, Wise B, Fuchs E. The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(15):8551–8556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8551. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
36. Hardy MH. The secret life of the hair follicle. Trends Genet. 1992;8(2):55–61. [PubMed]
37. Yabuta N, et al. Lats2 is an essential mitotic regulator required for the coordination of cell division. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(26):19259–19271. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608562200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
38. Hao Y, Chun A, Cheung K, Rashidi B, Yang X. Tumor suppressor LATS1 is a negative regulator of oncogene YAP. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(9):5496–5509. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709037200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
39. Hirabayashi S, et al. Threonine 74 of MOB1 is a putative key phosphorylation site by MST2 to form the scaffold to activate nuclear Dbf2-related kinase 1. Oncogene. 2008;27(31):4281–4292. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.66. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
40. Mill P, et al. Sonic hedgehog-dependent activation of Gli2 is essential for embryonic hair follicle development. Genes Dev. 2003;17(2):282–294. doi: 10.1101/gad.1038103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
41. Ewing RM, et al. Large-scale mapping of human protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:89. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Rual JF, et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2005;437(7062):1173–1178. [PubMed]
43. Tamm C, Bower N, Anneren C. Regulation of mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal by a Yes-YAP-TEAD2 signaling pathway downstream of LIF. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(pt7):1136–1144. doi: 10.1242/jcs.075796. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
44. Lian I, et al. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2010;24(11):1106–1118. doi: 10.1101/gad.1903310. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
45. Nishioka N, et al. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev Cel. 2009;16(3):398–410. [PubMed]
46. Yagi R, et al. Transcription factor TEAD4 specifies the trophectoderm lineage at the beginning of mammalian development. Development. 2007;134(21):3827–3836. doi: 10.1242/dev.010223. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
47. Farooq A, Walker LJ, Bowling J, Audisio RA. Cowden syndrome. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36(8):577–583. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.04.002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
48. Zhang H, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Yes-associated protein (YAP) transcriptional coactivator functions in balancing growth and differentiation in skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(6):2270–2275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019603108. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
49. Kang W, et al. Yes-associated protein 1 exhibits oncogenic property in gastric cancer and its nuclear accumulation associates with poor prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(8):2130–2139. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2467. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
50. Lim JY, et al. Merlin suppresses the SRE-dependent transcription by inhibiting the activation of Ras-ERK pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;302(2):238–245. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00124-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
51. Kilili GK, Kyriakis JM. Mammalian Ste20-like kinase (Mst2) indirectly supports Raf-1/ERK pathway activity via maintenance of protein phosphatase-2A catalytic subunit levels and consequent suppression of inhibitory Raf-1 phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(20):15076–15087. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.078915. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
52. Takahashi Y, Miyoshi Y, Morimoto K, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y, Noguchi S. Low LATS2 mRNA level can predict favorable response to epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide, but not to docetaxel, in breast cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007;133(8):501–509. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0194-0. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
53. Matsuura K, et al. Downregulation of SAV1 plays a role in pathogenesis of high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:523. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
54. Gu H, Zou YR, Rajewsky K. Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting. Cell. 1993;73(6):1155–1164. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90644-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
55. Suzuki A, et al. Brca2 is required for embryonic cellular proliferation in the mouse. Genes Dev. 1997;11(10):1242–1252. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.10.1242. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
56. Verrou C, Zhang Y, Zurn C, Schamel WW, Reth M. Comparison of the tamoxifen regulated chimeric Cre recombinases MerCreMer and CreMer. Biol Chem. 1999;380(12):1435–1438. [PubMed]
57. Takata M, et al. Tyrosine kinases Lyn and Syk regulate B cell receptor-coupled Ca2+ mobilization through distinct pathways. EMBO J. 1994;13(6):1341–1349. [PubMed]
58. Sakai Y, Yoshiura Y, Nakazawa K. Embryoid body culture of mouse embryonic stem cells using microwell and micropatterned chips. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.08.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
59. Lichti U, Anders J, Yuspa SH. Isolation and short-term culture of primary keratinocytes, hair follicle populations and dermal cells from newborn mice and keratinocytes from adult mice for in vitro analysis and for grafting to immunodeficient mice. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(5):799–810. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.50. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation