Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e52956.
Published online 2012 December 28. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0052956
PMCID: PMC3532209

Nuclear Import of UBL-Domain Protein Mdy2 Is Required for Heat-Induced Stress Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mick F. Tuite, Editor


Ubiquitin (Ub) and ubiquitin-like (UBL) proteins regulate a diverse array of cellular pathways through covalent as well as non-covalent interactions with target proteins. Yeast protein Mdy2 (Get5) and its human homolog GdX (Ubl4a) belong to the class of UBL proteins which do not form conjugates with other proteins. Mdy2 is required for cell survival under heat stress and for efficient mating. As part of a complex with Sgt2 and Get4 it has been implicated in the biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins. Interestingly, in response to heat stress, Mdy2 protein that is predominantly localized in the nucleus co-localized with poly(A)-binding protein Pab1 to cytoplasmic stress granules suggesting that nucleocytoplasmic shuttling is of functional importance. Here we investigate the nuclear import of Mdy2, a process that is independent of the Get4/Sgt2 complex but required for stress response. Nuclear import is mediated by an N-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS) and this process is essential for the heat stress response. In contrast, cells expressing Mdy2 lacking a nuclear export signal (NES) behave like wild type. Importantly, both Mdy2 and Mdy2-ΔNES, but not Mdy2-ΔNLS, physically interact with Pab1 and this interaction correlates with the accumulation in cytoplasmic stress granules. Thus, the nuclear history of the UBL Mdy2 appears to be essential for its function in cytoplasmic stress granules during the rapid cellular response to heat stress.


Ubiquitin-like (UBL) proteins with their characteristic UBL domain are involved in a wide range of cellular processes, such as targeting and formation of nuclear compartments, spindle pole body duplication, and apoptosis. Ubiquitin-like proteins are divided into two subclasses [1]. Type-1 ubiquitin-like polypeptides (UBLs) essentially consist only of the UBL domain and function as modifiers like ubiquitin, being ligated to target proteins in a process similar to ubiquitylation. Important examples are SUMO, NEDD8, and UCRP/ISG15. In type-2 proteins the UBL domain is accompanied by other domains suggesting different functions. This is supported by the observation that type-2 proteins do not form covalent conjugates with target proteins [1], [2].

Although ubiquitin-like type-2 proteins are studied intensively little is known about their specific cellular function. MDY2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a protein of 212 amino acids containing a conserved UBL domain (residues 74–149). Unlike most yeast proteins that contain such a domain, Mdy2 does not interact with polyubiquinated proteins nor does it bind the 26S proteasome [3]. MDY2 was identified as a gene necessary for cell survival under heat stress and for efficient mating [2], [4], [5]. The closest homolog of Mdy2 is the human ubiquitin-like protein GdX (Ubl4a) which consists of 157 amino acids [6]. The shared regions of homology show a 34% identity and encompass residues 74–212 of Mdy2 and the N-terminal 123 residues of GdX/Ubl4a. The N-terminal domain of Mdy2 is only conserved in fungi. Deletion of MDY2 increased heat sensitivity of mutant cells. Strains contain shorter microtubules (MTs) and accumulate defects in nuclear migration during mitosis [4]. In addition, deletion of MDY2 is associated with a five- to seven-fold reduction in mating efficiency, mainly due to defects in nuclear migration and karyogamy at the prezygotic stage [2]. Mdy2 (also known as Tma24 or Get5) was recently identified in a protein complex (composed of Sgt2, Get4 and Mdy2) implicated in tail-anchored membrane protein (TAP) insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] also suggesting its important roles in the cytoplasm.

Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of proteins is essential in coordinating nuclear events such as transcription and ribosome assembly with cellular processes such as translation and metabolism. It is well established that nuclear localization and export signals (NLSs and NESs) direct proteins in and out of the nucleus, respectively (reviewed in [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]). NLSs are short peptide motifs that mediate the nuclear import of proteins by binding to their receptors, known as importins (karyopherins) [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The best characterized transport signal is the classical NLS (cNLS) for nuclear protein import which consists of either one (monopartite) or two (bipartite) stretches of basic amino acids [17], [18], [19]. In contrast, cargos traveling toward the cytoplasm usually display a leucine-rich NES containing critical hydrophobic residues necessary for recognition by the nuclear export receptor Crm1 [20]. Nucleocytoplasmic transport proceeds through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) that penetrate the nuclear envelope and allow passive diffusion of particles below the exclusion limit of 20–40 kDa, while larger components need to interact with a meshwork of nucleoporin repeats during translocation [21].

According to our previous studies Mdy2 localizes predominantly in the nucleus. However, under heat stress the UBL protein accumulates in cytoplasmic foci containing the poly(A)-binding protein Pab1, a marker for stress granules (SG) [4]. During glucose deprivation a minority of Mdy2 foci overlapped with processing bodies (PB) marker Dcp2, while most Mdy2 and Pab1 overlap in stress granules [4].

Here, we analyze the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling activity of Mdy2 in closer detail. We show that nuclear localization of Mdy2 is independent of Get4 and Sgt2. Furthermore, the fungal-specific N-terminus dependent nuclear import of Mdy2 is essential for the function of Mdy2 during heat stress and also, unexpectedly, for recruitment to cytoplasmic foci.

Results and Discussion

Analysis of Heat-induced Stress Tolerance in mdy2, get4, and sgt2 Deletion Mutants

As mentioned above, Mdy2 function during the assembly of TAPs in ER-membrane as part of the Get4/Sgt2 complex has been studied extensively [22]. To analyze the heat-induced stress tolerance we constructed single and double deletions of GET4 and SGT2 with MDY2 and tested them under heat stress. Exponentially growing cells were serially diluted and dropped on selective plates and incubated at 28°C and 38°C. Consistent with previous results mdy2Δ strains exhibit reduced stress tolerance at elevated temperature (Figure 1A). In contrast GET4 or SGT2 deletion showed only weak heat-sensitivity in comparison to wild type strains. Double deletion strains of mdy2Δget4Δ or mdy2Δsgt2Δ exhibit no synergistic sensitivity (Figure 1A). We also addressed the ability of mdy2Δ, get4Δ and sgt2Δ strains to grow in liquid medium at 38°C (Fig. 1B). In agreement with the reported phenotype on plate assays, growth in liquid medium at 38°C supports the notion that MDY2 deletion mutants increase temperature sensitivity of the yeast cells. GET4 and SGT2 deletion mutants showed only weak heat-sensitivity in comparison to wild type strains.

Figure 1
Deletion of GET4 or SGT2 does not modify heat sensitivity or nuclear localization of Mdy2.

Next, we analyzed nuclear localization of Mdy2 in the absence of Get4 or Sgt2. Consistent with previous results, GFP-Mdy2 predominantly accumulates in the nucleus. The same is true for get4Δ as well as sgt2Δ strains (Figure 1C), suggesting that a functional Mdy2/Get4/Sgt2 complex is not essential for nuclear localization of Mdy2 (Figure 1C). In summary, genetic and cell biological data support the assumption that Mdy2 regulation of heat-induced stress tolerance is independent of Get4 and Sgt2 and thus, most likely, a novel function of the Mdy2.

The Fungal-specific N-terminus of Mdy2 is Functionally Important during Heat Stress

Mdy2 is 212 amino acids long. Structural analyses suggest a tripartite domain structure which is common in all fungi (reviewed in [23]). The N-terminal domain of Mdy2 is 73 amino acids long and shows interaction with Get4 [24], followed by the highly conserved UBL domain from amino acid 74 to 149 and the C-terminal domain from amino acid 150 to 212. The latter has been implicated in Mdy2 homodimerization [24], [25]. Sequence similarity between Mdy2 and the mammalian homolog GdX (Ubl4a, 154 amino acids in length) encompass residues 74–212 of Mdy2 and the N-terminal 123 residues of GdX. To map functional domains of Mdy2, various truncated versions were constructed by PCR and in vivo recombination (see Material and Methods). After verification corresponding strains were examined in response to heat stress (as above; Figure 2A). Strains expressing Mdy2 and Mdy2ΔC (residues 1–149) showed similar growth behavior suggesting that the C-terminal region is dispensable for heat-induced stress response. However, strains expressing Mdy2ΔN (residues 74–212) or Mdy2UBL (residues 74–149) revealed similar heat sensitivity and growth defects at elevated temperature as mdy2Δ mutants. Western blot analysis of Mdy2 variants revealed no significant differences in protein expression levels compared to the control Mdy2 (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
Deletion of the N-terminal region Mdy2 affects GFP-Mdy2 nuclear localization and heat sensitivity.

Analyzing the subcellular localization of the Mdy2 variants revealed that the N-terminal 74 amino acid residues are essential for nuclear localization (Figure 2C and D). Full-length and C-terminal truncated Mdy2 showed a predominantly nuclear staining (Figure 2C, two upper panels and Figure 2D), whereas N-terminal truncated and NC-truncated UBL-domain (residues 74–149) showed a cytoplasmic distribution (Figure 2C, two lower panels and Figure 2D). To summarize, the fungal-specific N-terminal region of Mdy2 is responsible for its nuclear import, and nuclear localization correlates with functional importance during heat stress. The C-terminal end that is involved in Mdy2 homodimerization [24], [25] is, on the other hand, dispensable for nuclear targeting and heat-stress response.

The N-terminal Region of Mdy2 Contains a Functional NLS

To study nucleocytoplasmic shuttling we searched for a NLS and NES sequences (see below). We identified three potential candidates for classical NLS, which are rich in lysine and arginine (amino acid residues 26–36 KLPKSYTKPLK, 49–61 KYKYKQNRAKKLK and 79–80 KK). Mutant versions of Mdy2 carrying deletions in these regions were generated by assembly PCR and in vivo recombination (see Materials and Methods). The correct sequence and expression were verified (Figure S1A and data not shown). We then examined the growth behavior of cells carrying these deletions, Mdy2-Δ26–36, Mdy2-Δ49–61, and Mdy2-Δ79–80, in response to heat stress as described (Figure S1B). Full-length Mdy2 and Mdy2-Δ79–80 showed similar growth behavior at elevated temperature suggesting that the deletion of the two lysines is not functionally important. In contrast, Mdy2-Δ26–36 and Mdy2-Δ49–61 exhibit similar heat sensitivity as mdy2Δ mutants suggesting that these regions are essential for heat-induced stress tolerance. Strains harboring GFP-Mdy2-Δ26–36 and GFP-Mdy2-Δ79–80 showed a predominantly nuclear staining (Figure 3A, panels 2 and 4 and 3B). However, strains harboring GFP-Mdy2-Δ49–61 showed only cytoplasmic distribution (Figure 3A, panel 3 and 3B). Thus, a functional NLS of Mdy2 is located between amino acid 49 to 61.

Figure 3
Identification of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the N-terminal domain and a nuclear export signal (NES) in the UBL domain of Mdy2.

GFP-Mdy2-Δ79–80 showed an enhanced nuclear staining suggesting that these two K residues in the UBL domain are involved in the nuclear export of Mdy2 (see below). In an additional step, the 13 amino acid NLS sequence of the protein (49-KYKYKQNRAKKLK-61) was subjected to partial deletion to test their influence on localization of the fusion protein. Two additional GFP-Mdy2-constructs with deletions of amino acid residues 49–53 (KYKYK) and 56–61 (RAKKLK) were generated, and strains expressing GFP-Mdy2-Δ49–53 and GFP-Mdy2-Δ56–61 were examined for localization of Mdy2. We observed that both segments are necessary for the NLS activity and nuclear import of Mdy2 (Figure S2). These results indicate two important regions in the N-terminus that are essential for yeast heat-stress induced tolerance. One of them has the characteristic features of a functional NLS.

Mdy2 Carries a Functional Nuclear Export Signal (NES)

The localization of Mdy2 might be influenced by the presence of a nuclear export signal (NES). We used NetNES 1.1 prediction tool, which predicts leucine-rich nuclear export signals (NES) in eukaryotic proteins [26]. The analysis yielded a single sequence, between amino acids 118–122, which could be considered as a nuclear export sequence (NES). We generated mutant versions of Mdy2 carrying deletions in this region (GFP-MDY2-ΔNES) by assembly PCR and in vivo recombination and verified its sequence and expression (Figure S1A and data not shown). GFP-MDY2-Δ118–122 localized predominantly in the nucleus and evidently at nuclear foci (Figure 3A, panel 5, 3B and see below) indicating that the amino acid residues from 118 to 122 are important for nuclear export.

In summary, we have delineated features that are required for nuclear import and export of Mdy2: a classic bipartite nuclear localization signal (cNLS) is present in the N-terminal region of Mdy2 between amino acid residues 49 to 61 and a nuclear export signal (NES) is located proximal to the NLS in the UBL domain of Mdy2 between amino acid residues 118 to 122.

The NES Motif is Important for Interaction of Mdy2 with Sgt2 but not Get4

To test whether deletion of NLS and/or NES affects the association of Mdy2 with the previously identified partner proteins Get4 and Sgt2, co-precipitation experiments were conducted. In accord with previous results [27], [28], GST-tagged Get4 or Sgt2 can bind Mdy2 (Figure 4A and 4B, lane 6). Similarly, GST-tagged Get4 or Sgt2 can interact with Mdy2-ΔNLS (Figure 4A and 4B, lane 7) indicating that these 13 amino acids from the N-terminal region of Mdy2 have no effect on the interaction of Mdy2 with Get4. However, deletion of the 4 amino acid long NES motif within the UBL domain (MDY2-ΔNES) abolishes binding of Mdy2 to Sgt2 (Figure 4B, lane 8). From this assay and in accord with previous results [28], we concluded that the NES in the UBL domain of Mdy2 is the predominant interaction surface of Mdy2 for Sgt2 which might function in masking this export signal.

Figure 4
Binding assays of Get4 and Sgt2 with Mdy2-ΔNLS and Mdy2-ΔNES mutant proteins.

Nuclear Import of Mdy2 is Necessary for Heat Stress-induced Response and Recruitment to Cytoplasmic Stress Granules

To explore the growth of Mdy2-ΔNLS and Mdy2-ΔNES mutants in more detail we studied the growth behavior of cells by expressing mdy2-ΔNLS (see Figure 3) and mdy2-ΔNES controlled by the natural MDY2 promoter sequence (Figure 5). Western blot analysis of Mdy2 variants revealed no significant differences in protein expression levels compared to the control Mdy2 (Figure 5A). mdy2 mutants with defective nuclear localization (mdy2-ΔNLS) showed a growth defect at elevated temperatures (Figure 5B, third row). Diversely, mdy2-ΔNES mutants behaved more or less like wild type (Figure 5B, lower row). We then investigated the ability of mdy2-ΔNLS and mdy2-ΔNES strains to grow in liquid medium at 38°C (Fig. 5C). In agreement with the reported phenotype on plate assays, growth in liquid medium at 38°C supports the notion that mdy2-ΔNLS showed a growth defect at elevated temperatures. Taken together these results indicate that the NLS but not the NES is essential for the function of Mdy2 in heat-induced stress tolerance.

Figure 5
Heat sensitivity of Mdy2 mutants with defective nuclear localization, Mdy2-ΔNLS, and nuclear export, Mdy2-ΔNES.

GFP-Mdy2 proteins which are localized predominantly in the nucleus at permissive temperature are localized to cytoplasmic foci during heat shock and glucose deprivation [4]. Co-localization studies revealed that mild heat stress-induced enrichment of Mdy2 in cytoplasmic foci merged mainly with stress granules marker Pab1 ([4] and Figure 6A, middle panel). Accordingly, shifting wild-type cells to either 37°C or 39°C led to a modest and reproducible increase in the number and size of stress granules and P-bodies [29]. During robust heat stress, and in accord with previous studies [30], Mdy2 foci overlapped with P-bodies marker Dcp2 and with SG marker Pab1 (Figure 6A, right panel).

Figure 6
Localization of Mdy2 mutants with defective nuclear localization, Mdy2-ΔNLS, and nuclear export, Mdy2-ΔNES.

We then addressed the important aspect of subcellular localization of Mdy2 versions under heat stress conditions. As shown before, GFP-Mdy2-ΔNLS protein is distributed in the cytoplasm, whereas the GFP-Mdy2-ΔNES accumulated predominantly in the nucleus at permissive temperatures (Figures 3, ,6B6B and and7A).7A). During mild heat stress GFP-Mdy2 proteins are targeted from a predominantly nuclear position to cytoplasmic foci (Figure 6A, middle panel and Figure 6C, upper panel; [4]). Analyzing Mdy2-ΔNES revealed that this mutant version, like wild-type, also accumulates in cytoplasmic foci and hardly in the nucleus (Figure 6C, lower panel). We then examined subcellular distribution of Mdy2, Mdy2-ΔNLS and Mdy2-ΔNES in stress conditions such as robust heat stress (46°C) [30] and treatment with 0.5% (v/v) sodium azide, which also induces stress granules-like foci [29]. We could verify co-localization of GFP-Mdy2 and GFP-Mdy2-ΔNES with Pab1 under robust heat stress and NaN3 treatment conditions (Figure 7A) Thus, apparently during heat stress an NES sequence-independent signal results in nuclear export and cytoplasmic accumulation.

Figure 7
Mdy2 co-localize and interact with Pab1.

Interestingly, analysis of Mdy2-ΔNLS revealed that this version, although present in the cytoplasm, is unable to accumulate in cytoplasmic foci (Figure 6C, and and7A).7A). This suggests that the nuclear history of Mdy2 is important for function during heat stress and for recruitment to cytoplasmic Pab1-positive stress granules (see below).

Nuclear Imported Mdy2 Physically Interacts with Pab1

During affinity purification of GST-Mdy2 we found distinct and reproducible protein bands around 70 kD (Figure 7B). Analyses of isolated complex by mass spectrometry resulted in the identification of three Hsp70 proteins, Ssa1, Ssa2, Ssb1, and poly(A)-binding protein Pab1 as the highest scoring proteins. The same analysis allowed the identification of four other proteins but with much lower scores: pre-mRNA polyadenylation factor Fip1, checkpoint serine/threonine-protein kinase Bub1, transketolase Tkl1, and ATP-dependent RNA helicase Dbp3. Previous studies showed that Mdy2 exits in complex with Hsp70s [11]. But the most interesting finding in this experiment is that three of these 8 identified proteins, Pab1, Fip1, and Dbp3 are components of the mRNA processing complex. Of these, Pab1 was the most interesting candidate because it showed a high score, like, Hsp70s in complex with Mdy2 and is known to co-localize with Mdy2 [4]. Here we checked the interaction between Mdy2 and Pab1 in reciprocal co-precipitation experiments and we extended this approach to monitor Pab1 co-precipitation with Mdy2-ΔNLS and Myc-Mdy2-ΔNES (Figure 7C). We confirmed the interaction between Mdy2 and Pab1 as we detected Myc-tagged Mdy2 from yeast cells expressing a GST-Pab1 fusion (Figure 7C, lane 6). We found that Myc-tagged Mdy2 and, to a lower extent, Myc-Mdy2-ΔNES were co-precipitated with GST-Pab1 (Figure 7C, lane 6 and 8). However, Myc-Mdy2-ΔNLS abolishes binding of Mdy2 to Pab1 (Figure 7C, lane 7) indicating that Myc-Mdy2-ΔNLS cannot bind to GST-Pab1. Hence it is most likely that Mdy2 already interacts with Pab1-containing messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complex in the nucleus. This interaction appears to be important for the recruitment to stress granules and this, again, correlates with the heat stress function of Mdy2.

Conclusions and Perspectives

Altogether, nucleocytoplasmic shuttling correlates with the heat stress function of Mdy2 and the accumulation of Mdy2 in stress granules. Cytoplasmic stress granules in S. cerevisiae contain proteins like Pab1 [31], [32]. Importantly, Mdy2 not only interacts with Pab1 but also co-localizes with Pab1 following heat stress [4]. Pab1 is the major poly(A)-binding protein in yeast. It is a multifunctional protein that mediates many cellular functions associated with the 3′-poly(A)-tail of messenger RNAs. Pab1 shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and functions in mRNA export [33]. Pab1 therefore appears to actively enter the nucleus and exit via two transports pathways: one pathway is dependent on XPO1/CRM1 through an NES located at the amino terminus of Pab1, whereas the second pathway requires MEX67 and/or ongoing mRNA export [33]. In analogy with Pab1 nuclear export Mdy2 carries a functional NES, but during heat stress an NES sequence-independent signal results in nuclear export and accumulation in cytoplasmic foci. Taking into account our results and a list of Mdy2 interactors like heat shock proteins and Pab1 (this paper and [4], [11], [34], [35]) we come to the conclusion that Mdy2 might play a role in mRNA metabolism. Interestingly, also the human ubiquitin-like protein GdX (Ubl4a) interacts with similar proteins [36], [37] suggesting an evolutionarily conserved process.

In response to stress, eukaryotic cells reprogram the mRNA metabolism to repair stress-induced damage and adapt to changed conditions. During this process the translation of mRNAs encoding “housekeeping” proteins is aborted, whereas the translation of mRNAs encoding molecular chaperones and enzymes involved in damage repair is enhanced. Selective recruitment of specific mRNA transcripts into stress granules is thought to regulate their stability and translation [38]. Heat stress granules selectively exclude mRNAs encoding stress-induced heat shock proteins [39]. In S. cerevisiae heat shock induces the formation of stress granules that contain translation initiation factors and non-heat shock mRNAs capable of redistributing into the cytoplasm, and presumably reengaging in translation, upon recovery [30], [40]. The robust heat shock-induced stress granules also contain a subset of processing body components involved in RNA degradation including Dcp2 and Dhh1, yet are spatially distinct from other processing body markers [30]. The fact that heat stress triggers stress granule assembly but not processing body formation indicates that these processes are regulated by distinct signaling pathways [29], [30], [41]. It has been proposed that stress granules are sites where the increased local concentration of proteins and mRNA allows for remodeling and redistribution of mRNPs [40]. Alternatively, specific proteins might be selectively sequestered into or away from stress granules, thus affecting biochemical processes in the cell. For example, recruitment of specific proteins such as RACK1, which is required to activate the apoptosis-inducing MTK1 kinase during stress, to stress granules can inhibit apoptosis [42].

Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that stress granule formation is one of the immediate protective mechanisms against heat stress. We speculate that Mdy2-containing stress granules fulfill a protective role for cell survival upon stress. Under these conditions, Mdy2 might accompany the Pab1-containing mRNP complex to stress granules, and this appears to be functionally important for stress protection. The mechanism and function of Mdy2 in the process remains unclear, but it appears to be essential for a rapid cellular response to stress in processes like stress granules dynamics in the control of non-translating mRNPs. This constitutes a novel link between UBL proteins and posttranscriptional processes.

Materials and Methods

Yeast Strains, Media, and Standard Methods

Recombinant DNA techniques were applied according to standard protocols. Depending on the experimental context, yeast cells were grown either in YEPD medium (2% glucose, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract), synthetic complete medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids) with 2% glucose (SD) containing the required nutrient supplements, or in synthetic raffinose galactose (SRG) medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 3% raffinose, 1% galactose) containing the appropriate nutrient supplements. All strains used in this study are in W303-1A (MATa leu2-3,112 ura3-1 trp1 his3-11 ade2 can1-100) background (source: R. Rothstein, Columbia University, New York). HZH686 (W303-1A MATa mdy2Δ::KanMX4) was previously described [2]; HKA200 (W303-1AMATa get4Δ::HIS3), HKA227 (W303-1A MATa mdy2Δ::KanMX4 get4Δ::HIS3), HLS2002 (W303-1A MATa sgt2Δ::HIS3), and HLS2024 (W303-1A MATamdy2Δ::KanMX4 sgt2Δ::HIS3) are constructed by homolog recombination. Expression vectors encoding full-length truncated or mutated Mdy2, as well as Get4 and Sgt2 were produced by PCR or assembly PCR, accordingly, and cloned by in vivo recombination into the galactose-inducible pGREGs expression vectors [43] or in vectors with the appropriate endogenous promoter and checked by restriction digestion, PCR, sequencing, and Western blot analysis. Plasmid MDY2p-GFP-MDY2 (pZH152) was previously described [2]. Plasmid pPAB1-RFP (PAB1-RFP LEU2, CEN) is a kind gift of Charles N. Cole (Dartmouth Medical School). Plasmids pRP1155 (pDCP2-RFP LEU2, CEN) is a kind gift of Roy Parker (University of Arizona).

Gene Deletion and PCR-mediated Gene Tagging

Deletion strains were constructed by homologous recombination with appropriate PCR-derived disruption cassettes. Each of these consisting of a central marker gene (KanMX6 or HIS3MX6) flanked by sequences homologous to regions adjacent to the gene to be disrupted. The disruption cassettes were introduced into cells by the high-efficiency LiAc transformation method. Correct disruption was verified by analytical PCR.

PCR-mediated gene tagging was performed using a similar method. The integration cassettes used consisted of a central tag (GST, Myc or GFP) with a selection marker (HIS3, TRP1 or KanMX6) and flanking sequences homologous to 3′-terminal sequences of the gene to be tagged. Correct tagging was verified by analytical PCR and sequence and expression analysis.

Immunoblot Analysis

For expression controls, log-phase yeast cells (equivalent to 4 OD600 units) were harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 3000 rpm), washed once in E-buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA pH 8, 0.1% Triton-X-100, 10% glycerol), then resuspended in lysis buffer (E-buffer +1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM Pi-Mix [pepstatin and aprotinin (at 1 mg/ml each), leupeptin and antipain (at 5 mg/ml each), 0.1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM PMSF]. Cells were broken down with (2/3 vol) glass beads and collected by centrifugation (2 min, 3000 rpm). The samples were denatured in SDS-PAGE sample buffer by boiling (10 min at 95°C), centrifuged briefly, applied to a 7.5% or 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and fractionated by electrophoresis. The proteins were then blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane according to standard protocol, and probed with polyclonal rabbit anti-GST (1[ratio]1000) and/or monoclonal mouse anti-Myc (1[ratio]1000). Bound primary antibodies were detected enzymatically with goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse antibodies coupled to alkaline phosphatase or horseradish peroxidase (1[ratio]5000 and 1[ratio]50.000, respectively).

Binding Assay

Cells to be used for binding assays were induced for 16 h in SRG medium, and extracts (equivalent to approximately 12 OD600 units) were prepared as described above. 20 µl Glutathione Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare, Germany) were added to 1 ml of extract and the samples were incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Then the samples were centrifuged (3 min, 13,000 rpm) and the pelleted complexes were washed four times in E-buffer+(see above). The samples were then boiled, fractionated on a 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to immunoblotting analysis as described above.


Cells were grown to log phase in YPD or in appropriate selection medium. Samples (equivalent to 1.5 ml of cells) were taken and washed twice with 500 µl of PBS (pH 7.0) in 1.5 ml reaction tubes. The cells were fixed for 5 min in 70% ethanol and again washed twice in PBS (pH 7.0). To stain DNA, cells were incubated for 10 min in 20 µl of DAPI (1 µg/ml) and washed twice in PBS (pH 7.0). Cells containing GFP-labeled Mdy2 or Mdy2 mutants were used for localization of fusion proteins. Images were acquired by fluorescence microscopy using a Zeiss Axioscope and Zeiss filter systems.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Analysis of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the N-terminal domain and a nuclear export signal (NES) in the UBL domain of Mdy2. (A) Protein expression levels of GFP-Mdy2 and different putative NLS and NES constructs of Mdy2 show no difference in mutant cells. Putative NLS deletion constructs of Mdy2 and a putative NLS deletion construct of Mdy2 (see schematics in Figure 6) were fused to the C-terminus of GFP protein and expressed under the control of the GAL1 promoter in mdy2Δ (HZH686) cells. Western blot analysis (left panel) and quantitative densitometry of protein expression (right panel) showed no changes in protein level of GFP-Mdy2 variants. GFP-Mdy2 was set to 1. (B) Temperature sensitivity of mdy2Δ cells carrying wild type Mdy2 (MDY2), empty vector (mdy2Δ), and different putative NLS deletion constructs of Mdy2 (mdy2-Δ26–36, mdy2-Δ49–61, and mdy2-Δ79–81, respectively) was analyzed as in Figure 1A. Representative experiments are shown.


Figure S2

Effect of the mutations on the nucleocytoplasmic distribution of Mdy2. mdy2-ΔNLS mutation constructs of mdy2-Δ49–53 and Δ56–61 show cytoplasmic distributions. mdy2-Δ49–53 and Δ56–61 deletion construct of Mdy2 was fused to the C-terminus of GFP protein, expressed under the control of the GAL1 promoter in mdy2Δ (HZH686) cells and was analyzed as in Figure 1B. Both Mdy2-ΔNLS mutant proteins show the cytolasmic distributions.



We thank B. Axler and E. Stratmann for technical and editorial assistance. We are grateful to M. Feldbrügge for critical reading of the manuscript and suggestions. We also thank C. N. Cole and R. Parker for providing plasmids.

Funding Statement

The authors have no support or funding to report.


1. Jentsch S, Pyrowolakis G (2000) Ubiquitin and its kin: how close are the family ties? Trends Cell Biol 10: 335–342 [PubMed]
2. Hu Z, Potthoff B, Hollenberg CP, Ramezani-Rad M (2006) Mdy2, a ubiquitin-like (UBL)-domain protein, is required for efficient mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 119: 326–338 [PubMed]
3. Saeki Y, Saitoh A, Toh-e A, Yokosawa H (2002) Ubiquitin-like proteins and Rpn10 play cooperative roles in ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293: 986–992 [PubMed]
4. Cohnen A, Bielig H, Hollenberg CP, Hu Z, Ramezani-Rad M (2010) The yeast ubiquitin-like domain protein Mdy2 is required for microtubule-directed nuclear migration and localizes to cytoplasmic granules in response to heat stress. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 67: 635–649 [PubMed]
5. Iwanejko L, Smith KN, Loeillet S, Nicolas A, Fabre F (1999) Disruption and functional analysis of six ORFs on chromosome XV: YOL117w, YOL115w (TRF4), YOL114c, YOL112w (MSB4), YOL111c and YOL072w. Yeast 15: 1529–1539 [PubMed]
6. Toniolo D, Martini G, Migeon BR, Dono R (1988) Expression of the G6PD locus on the human X chromosome is associated with demethylation of three CpG islands within 100 kb of DNA. Embo J 7: 401–406 [PubMed]
7. Battle A, Jonikas MC, Walter P, Weissman JS, Koller D (2010) Automated identification of pathways from quantitative genetic interaction data. Mol Syst Biol 6: 379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Bozkurt G, Stjepanovic G, Vilardi F, Amlacher S, Wild K, et al. (2009) Structural insights into tail-anchored protein binding and membrane insertion by Get3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21131–21136 [PubMed]
9. Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425–431 [PubMed]
10. Jonikas MC, Collins SR, Denic V, Oh E, Quan EM, et al. (2009) Comprehensive characterization of genes required for protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 323: 1693–1697 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Wang F, Brown EC, Mak G, Zhuang J, Denic V (2010) A chaperone cascade sorts proteins for posttranslational membrane insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Cell 40: 159–171 [PubMed]
12. Chook YM, Blobel G (2001) Karyopherins and nuclear import. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11: 703–715 [PubMed]
13. Gorlich D, Kutay U (1999) Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 607–660 [PubMed]
14. Lange A, Mills RE, Devine SE, Corbett AH (2008) A PY-NLS nuclear targeting signal is required for nuclear localization and function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA-binding protein Hrp1. J Biol Chem 283: 12926–12934 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Lange A, Mills RE, Lange CJ, Stewart M, Devine SE, et al. (2007) Classical nuclear localization signals: definition, function, and interaction with importin alpha. J Biol Chem 282: 5101–5105 [PubMed]
16. Mattaj IW, Englmeier L (1998) Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase. Annu Rev Biochem 67: 265–306 [PubMed]
17. Dingwall C, Laskey RA (1991) Nuclear targeting sequences–a consensus? Trends Biochem Sci 16: 478–481 [PubMed]
18. Kalderon D, Richardson WD, Markham AF, Smith AE (1984) Sequence requirements for nuclear location of simian virus 40 large-T antigen. Nature 311: 33–38 [PubMed]
19. Robbins J, Dilworth SM, Laskey RA, Dingwall C (1991) Two interdependent basic domains in nucleoplasmin nuclear targeting sequence: identification of a class of bipartite nuclear targeting sequence. Cell 64: 615–623 [PubMed]
20. Dong X, Biswas A, Suel KE, Jackson LK, Martinez R, et al. (2009) Structural basis for leucine-rich nuclear export signal recognition by CRM1. Nature 458: 1136–1141 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Tran EJ, Bolger TA, Wente SR (2007) SnapShot: nuclear transport. Cell 131: 420. [PubMed]
22. Hegde RS, Keenan RJ (2011) Tail-anchored membrane protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 787–798 [PubMed]
23. Simpson PJ, Schwappach B, Dohlman HG, Isaacson RL (2010) Structures of Get3, Get4, and Get5 provide new models for TA membrane protein targeting. Structure 18: 897–902 [PubMed]
24. Chartron JW, Suloway CJ, Zaslaver M, Clemons WM Jr (2010) Structural characterization of the Get4/Get5 complex and its interaction with Get3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 12127–12132 [PubMed]
25. Chartron JW, VanderVelde DG, Rao M, Clemons WM (2012) Get5 Carboxyl-terminal Domain Is a Novel Dimerization Motif That Tethers an Extended Get4/Get5 Complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287: 8310–8317 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. la Cour T, Kiemer L, Molgaard A, Gupta R, Skriver K, et al. (2004) Analysis and prediction of leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Protein Eng Des Sel 17: 527–536 [PubMed]
27. Chang YW, Chuang YC, Ho YC, Cheng MY, Sun YJ, et al. (2010) Crystal structure of Get4-Get5 complex and its interactions with Sgt2, Get3, and Ydj1. J Biol Chem 285: 9962–9970 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Chartron JW, Gonzalez GM, Clemons WM Jr (2011) A structural model of the Sgt2 protein and its interactions with chaperones and the Get4/Get5 complex. J Biol Chem 286: 34325–34334 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Buchan JR, Yoon JH, Parker R (2011) Stress-specific composition, assembly and kinetics of stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 124: 228–239 [PubMed]
30. Grousl T, Ivanov P, Frydlova I, Vasicova P, Janda F, et al. (2009) Robust heat shock induces eIF2alpha-phosphorylation-independent assembly of stress granules containing eIF3 and 40S ribosomal subunits in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 122: 2078–2088 [PubMed]
31. Brengues M, Parker R (2007) Accumulation of polyadenylated mRNA, Pab1p, eIF4E, and eIF4G with P-bodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2592–2602 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Hoyle NP, Castelli LM, Campbell SG, Holmes LE, Ashe MP (2007) Stress-dependent relocalization of translationally primed mRNPs to cytoplasmic granules that are kinetically and spatially distinct from P-bodies. J Cell Biol 179: 65–74 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Brune C, Munchel SE, Fischer N, Podtelejnikov AV, Weis K (2005) Yeast poly(A)-binding protein Pab1 shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm and functions in mRNA export. Rna 11: 517–531 [PubMed]
34. Fleischer TC, Weaver CM, McAfee KJ, Jennings JL, Link AJ (2006) Systematic identification and functional screens of uncharacterized proteins associated with eukaryotic ribosomal complexes. Genes Dev 20: 1294–1307 [PubMed]
35. Liou ST, Cheng MY, Wang C (2007) SGT2 and MDY2 interact with molecular chaperone YDJ1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Stress Chaperones 12: 59–70 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Sowa ME, Bennett EJ, Gygi SP, Harper JW (2009) Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138: 389–403 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Wang Q, Liu Y, Soetandyo N, Baek K, Hegde R, et al. (2011) A ubiquitin ligase-associated chaperone holdase maintains polypeptides in soluble states for proteasome degradation. Mol Cell 42: 758–770 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Anderson P, Kedersha N (2006) RNA granules. J Cell Biol 172: 803–808 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Kedersha N, Chen S, Gilks N, Li W, Miller IJ, et al. (2002) Evidence that ternary complex (eIF2-GTP-tRNA(i)(Met))-deficient preinitiation complexes are core constituents of mammalian stress granules. Mol Biol Cell 13: 195–210 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Buchan JR, Parker R (2009) Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol Cell 36: 932–941 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Kedersha N, Stoecklin G, Ayodele M, Yacono P, Lykke-Andersen J, et al. (2005) Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J Cell Biol 169: 871–884 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Arimoto K, Fukuda H, Imajoh-Ohmi S, Saito H, Takekawa M (2008) Formation of stress granules inhibits apoptosis by suppressing stress-responsive MAPK pathways. Nat Cell Biol 10: 1324–1332 [PubMed]
43. Jansen G, Wu C, Schade B, Thomas DY, Whiteway M (2005) Drag&Drop cloning in yeast. Gene 344: 43–51 [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science