PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
 
J Palliat Med. Jan 2012; 15(1): 25–28.
PMCID: PMC3532005
Leveraging External Resources To Grow and Sustain Your Palliative Care Program: A Call to Action
Steven Z. Pantilat, M.D.,corresponding author1 Kathleen M. Kerr, B.A.,1 Jean S. Kutner, M.D., MSPH,2 Frank D. Ferris, M.D.,3 Megan A. Rathfon, M.A.,1 and Michael W. Rabow, M.D.4
1Palliative Care Program, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
2Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
3Institute for Palliative Medicine at San Diego Hospice, San Diego, California.
4Palliative Care Program and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California.
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Address correspondence to: Steven Z. Pantilat, M.D., Palliative Care Program, University of California, San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Avenue, Suite C-126, San Francisco, CA 94143-0903. E-mail:stevep/at/medicine.ucsf.edu
Accepted August 24, 2011.
Hospital-based palliative care is becoming increasingly prevalent. There is growing evidence that it is having a positive impact on patients and their loved ones. In 2008, national data indicated that 58.5% of hospitals with 50 or more beds had a palliative care program. Data from a 2008 survey of California acute care hospitals showed that although 33% of sites had inpatient consultation services, one in five had been operational for only one year. As nascent palliative care programs grow, new issues arise and needs and plans change. Just as palliative care programs benefit from marketing and education plans, they also benefit from a plan to leverage external resources. Largely a missed opportunity, external resources such as organizations, networks, and experts can help palliative care service (PCS) leaders and team members gain information on everything from best practices to funding opportunities, while serving as sources for personal and professional support. The growing number of active PCSs and the increasing availability of support and expertise ensure that new programs no longer have to face challenges alone. Further, the steady increase in the number of new programs has created opportunities for those who are more experienced to serve as mentors for peers who are navigating the challenges of growing and sustaining a clinical service. The authors encourage both mentors and mentees to seek support from or provide support to others in the field. Leveraging the collective expertise and experiences in our field can ensure that palliative care continues to thrive and grow.
Hospital-based palliative care is becoming increasingly prevalent. There is growing evidence that it is having a positive impact on patients and their loved ones.14 In 2008, national data indicated that 58.5% of hospitals with 50 or more beds had a palliative care program.1 Data from a 2008 survey of California acute care hospitals showed that although 33% of sites had inpatient consultation services, one in five had been operational for only one year.5 Thus, as a field, palliative care has both a large cohort of new programs that are launched each year, along with a growing number of established services.
As palliative care programs grow and mature they face challenges that can threaten sustainability. To face these challenges, palliative care service (PCS) leaders need to be versed in a wide range of skills. Leaders of palliative care programs need to be able to deliver clinical excellence and demonstrate to multiple stakeholders the many ways their services add to the value and quality of care by enhancing clinical and nonclinical outcomes. They need to exercise principles of leadership and understand team dynamics, engage with senior leaders of their hospital or health system, cultivate philanthropic support for their services, and craft sustainable job descriptions for service staff. They also need to balance the creation of a supportive environment, which encourages team members to practice self care, with the seemingly incompatible need to provide comprehensive care to large numbers of patients and families with complex needs. Programs and program leaders need information on clinical, consultation, education, administrative, leadership, and interpersonal best practices, on practices to avoid, and on how to run various aspects of the program. Palliative care team members and team leaders need help anticipating challenges and next steps, gathering community social support and encouragement, and obtaining resources such as funding and personnel.
Fortunately, there are ample external resources to help PCSs address these challenges. Launching a new program requires developing a business plan, a staffing plan, a marketing plan, and a training plan. An approach to leveraging the services and expertise of external resources such as organizations, networks, and experts is an equally important aspect of ensuring successful growth and sustainability. This paper describes the types of support that PCS leaders and team members can access by engaging with various types of external resources. We also describe how leveraging external resources allows the palliative care field to pool knowledge, gain new information, increase awareness, change attitudes, and further the collective goal of giving patients and families the best care possible.
External resources fall into three categories: (1) organizations, (2) networks, and (3) experts. Each of these resources can help palliative care programs identify clinical, administrative, and interpersonal best practices and avoid ineffective practices and common mistakes. These resources provide a comparative check on a program's development and growth pattern, and reassurance regarding common experiences at each stage of the development process. External resources can give program members personal and professional support and enhance relationships. They can also be a gateway to additional expertise and capital, such as funding and collaboration opportunities.
Organizations
Organizations can provide invaluable support to palliative care programs that are in development, committed to sustainability, or looking to expand (see Table 1). Regional and especially national palliative care organizations, such as the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM), the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (HPNA), the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO), and the Center to Advance Palliative Care (CAPC) offer a wide range of opportunities to palliative care providers including educational resources, seminars, national meetings, and online and in-person trainings. Other national organizations such as the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM), the Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE), and the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) include sections, committees, or interest groups that relate directly or indirectly to palliative care.
Table 1.
Table 1.
A Sampling of Professional Organizations
Organizations with groups of peers, educators, researchers, and administrators can be the locus of “communities of support.” Communities can offer emotional support, mentorship, and collegiality, and serve in the exchange of ideas and strategies. Given that many palliative care clinicians practice in relative isolation and counter to the prevailing clinical focus of their institutions, finding like-minded colleagues outside one's own institution can be fruitful. The community might gather in-person periodically, for example at an annual conference (such as the AAHPM/HPNA annual meeting or a CAPC National Seminar), or might connect in an ongoing manner, such as via a web-based discussion group (e.g., the CAPC Connect Forum; www.capc.org/capc-connect). Within a community, individuals may find mentoring (e.g., career or academic support from the AAHPM College of Palliative Care), research networks (e.g., the National Palliative Care Research Center or Palliative Care Research Cooperative [PCRC]) or connect with friends and colleagues via social networking. Colleagues outside one's local institution will bring a sense of perspective and the opportunity to benchmark clinical, educational, and administrative issues. Within larger organizations, a formal interest group may be a particularly useful way to connect to others (e.g., the palliative care interest group at SGIM).
Depending on the goals and needs of a palliative care program, virtual communities can be formed in-person or over the Internet. Increasingly, community is created through online blogs, such as Pallimed (www.pallimed.org) and GeriPal (www.geripal.org), which feature commentaries and discussions about palliative care issues.
Palliative care organization websites and palliative care journals online are other sources of up-to-date information. Organization websites list upcoming educational offerings such as End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC) and Education on Palliative and End-of-Life Care (EPEC) continuing education opportunities. The AAHPM lists certification and licensing information, as well as fellowships and preceptorships for experienced clinicians (www.AAHPM.org). This latter opportunity is important for team members and leaders who would benefit from visiting a well-established palliative care program and gaining experience in another setting. The International Palliative Care Resource Center (www.IPCRC.net), is a gateway to multiple different clinical, education, and leadership palliative care resources, including downloadable curricula (EPEC-Oncology and ELNEC).
Many organizations offer summaries of the clinical evidence base for palliative care, expert recommendations, and guidelines. Some organizations have mechanisms for alerting clinicians to new data, such as the PC-FACS produced by the AAHPM. Others, such as CAPC, offer e-mail alerts describing recently published research, and some offer direction about how to use the new findings strategically in program building or fund-raising.
Organizations can provide a number of different resources and products that can save PCS teams countless hours. These include templates for job descriptions, policies, and procedures; clinical rounding tools; order sets; brochures; information about coding and billing; and clinical survey instruments that can be purchased or downloaded for free and modified for use.
Finally, organization job boards are a good place to advertise for open positions or to seek job opportunities (e.g., AAHPM Job Mart at www.aahpm.org/jobmart/default/careercentral.html and HPNA Job Postings at www.hpna.org/JobPostings.aspx). Such resources also provide access to job descriptions and salary ranges for those starting the hiring process.
Networks
Networks, formal and informal, offer opportunities to collaborate or interact around common program characteristics such as region, health system, mission, or hospital type. The advantages of such interactions include maximizing the impact of the individual programs, solving common problems, and addressing common challenges, especially those unique to a state, region, or system. Networks are also an important tool for supporting quality improvement and research. Pooling efforts with other PCSs can increase the validity and sharing of general findings and can provide benchmarks or comparison data for quality improvement or research activities.
Examples of networks and systems include local or regional hospital groups and hospices; health care systems such as the Veterans Administration, Catholic Healthcare West, the Supportive Care Coalition, and Kaiser; regional collaboratives such as the Spreading Palliative Care in Public Hospitals initiative, supported by the California HealthCare Foundation; and research networks such as the Population-based Palliative Care Research Network (PoPCRN) and the PCRC.
Collaboration provides the opportunity for the development of benchmarking data and access to knowledge beyond what is feasible at a single site. On a national level, the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) have sponsored programs aimed at improving access to or evaluating outcomes of palliative care. Smaller networks and partnerships can be equally useful. Partnerships centered on mutual training needs or alignment of services, such as the one between the University of California, San Francisco Palliative Care Service and the Zen Hospice Project in San Francisco, the research partnership between the University of Colorado and The Denver Hospice, and the partnership between the Institute for Palliative Medicine at San Diego Hospice, all of the internal and family medicine training programs in San Diego County, and Scripps Health and the University of California, San Diego Palliative Care Service, can be productive and provide mutual support. Networks can also be centered around the initiative and needs of individuals. Local palliative care clinicians can organize clubs and grand rounds that are open to the community, creating a network and sense of common purpose.
Experts
Many programs benefit from accessing the experience, stature, and attention of experts. Experts can collaborate or provide focused, individualized feedback, help with specific technical issues, provide input regarding a particular service, or assist with crafting and communicating the palliative care message to different audiences. An expert can function as mentor, providing longitudinal support, or as consultant, with a brief and focused engagement. Effective mentors inspire a shared vision, challenge the current process, and enable others to act. Mentors can act as role models, provide an external perspective, facilitate access to resources, and guide strategic and business planning, team building, and skill building. Outside experts, by virtue of stature or simply a fresh perspective, can deliver a message about palliative care to hospital leadership, directors, and clinicians that may be better received than the same message stated by local leaders. Any experienced palliative care leader can serve as a mentor to others. Mentors often find they learn as much as they teach and can achieve a strong sense of accomplishment and satisfaction from helping others succeed.
The growth of palliative care programs presents many challenges. Fortunately, there are many ways to access help and meet those challenges. Assistance can come from many sources: professional organizations, networks, and experts. By taking advantage of these resources, new and established programs can get the support they need to more easily negotiate the challenges they inevitably face. Perhaps more importantly, by leveraging external resources, palliative care programs can pool knowledge and advance the collective goal of providing patients and families with the best care possible. It is important to remember that assistance can promote success, that programs and leaders can become a resource to others, and that palliative care programs are never in this work alone.
Acknowledgments
This paper was based on a presentation given at the 2010 AAHPM/HPNA Annual Assembly meeting held in Boston, Massachusetts, on March 3 through March 6, 2011. We thank Charles von Gunten, M.D., Ph.D., Meg Campbell, Ph.D., R.N., and F. Amos Bailey, M.D., for their contribution of ideas to this paper. We thank Elyse Salend, M.S.W., and E. Thomas Brewer, M.S.W., M.P.H., M.B.A., for their vision and support of the Innovations project that provided the opportunity and impetus for this paper. We thank Emily Philipps for her expert help with the Innovations project. Finally, we are indebted to the wonderful palliative care teams that participated in the Innovations project and taught us the value of mentorship, collegiality, and external resources in the growth of PCS: West Los Angeles Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, St. John's Regional Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Bellflower, Los Angeles County+University of Southern California (LAC+USC), and the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center (UCLA).
Financial support for this project was provided by the Archstone Foundation.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
1. 2002 to 2010 American Hospital Association Annual Hospital Surveys for FY 2000 to 2008; and Data from the Center to Advance Palliative Care's (CAPC) 2009 National Palliative Care Registry. www.capc.org/news-and-events/releases/04-05-10. [Jul 21;2011 ]. www.capc.org/news-and-events/releases/04-05-10
2. Higginson IJ. Evans CJ. What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families? Cancer J. 2010;16:423–435. [PubMed]
3. Morrison RS. Health care system factors affecting end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8:S79–S87. [PubMed]
4. Smith TJ. Cassel JB. Cost and non-clinical outcomes of palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:32–44. [PubMed]
5. Pantilat SZ. Kerr KM. Billings JA. Bruno KA. O'Riordan DL. Palliative care services in California hospitals: Program prevalence, hospital characteristics. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jul 29; [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed]
Articles from Journal of Palliative Medicine are provided here courtesy of
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.